Dodgers vs Milwaukee Brewers Match Player Stats

The dodgers vs milwaukee brewers match player stats from this Spring Training matchup tell a much bigger story than the final score alone. Milwaukee Brewers defeated the Los Angeles Dodgers 24-9 after producing 16 hits, drawing 12 walks, stealing five bases, and turning a close early game into a massive offensive result. The Dodgers finished with eight hits, nine runs, two home runs, and 10 walks, but three errors and a series of difficult pitching innings allowed Milwaukee to pull away.

The game was played at Camelback Ranch in Glendale, Arizona, during MLB Spring Training. The supplied box score records an attendance of 10,246 and a game time of 3:54. ESPN’s game record for Game ID 401833228 identifies the matchup as Milwaukee at Los Angeles and records the same 24-9 result.

For readers searching for player statistics, the most important takeaway is that this was not simply a home-run-driven victory. Milwaukee combined contact, patience, power, baserunning, and timely hitting. The Brewers went 9-for-18 with runners in scoring position, while Los Angeles went 4-for-14. That difference helps explain why the Brewers scored 15 more runs despite the Dodgers also hitting two home runs.

Table of Contents

Dodgers vs Milwaukee Brewers Match Player Stats at a Glance

Category	Milwaukee Brewers	Los Angeles Dodgers
Final Score	24	9
Runs	24	9
Hits	16	8
Errors	0	3
Home Runs	2	2
Walks	12	10
Strikeouts	11	13
RBI	21	9
RISP	9-for-18	4-for-14
Stolen Bases	5	1
Runs in 5th	10	0
Runs in 7th	9	1

MLB’s standard statistical definitions distinguish hits, runs, RBI, walks, strikeouts, stolen bases, and other measures, which is important when interpreting a box score rather than treating every offensive event as equivalent.

Final Score and How the Game Unfolded

The Dodgers actually had the better start.

Los Angeles scored twice in the second inning, five times in the third, once in the fourth, once in the seventh, and once in the eighth. Through four innings, the Dodgers had built a 7-0 lead.

That early advantage made the eventual result especially striking.

Milwaukee did not score during the first four innings. Instead, the Brewers exploded in the fifth inning with 10 runs, then added nine more in the seventh. They finished the game by scoring another five runs in the ninth.

The inning-by-inning scoring pattern was:

Inning	Brewers	Dodgers
1st	0	0
2nd	0	1
3rd	0	5
4th	0	1
5th	10	0
6th	0	0
7th	9	1
8th	0	1
9th	5	0
Total	24	9

The biggest statistical lesson is the importance of separating early-game performance from full-game performance. Los Angeles controlled the opening four innings, but Milwaukee’s offense completely changed the game once its hitters began reaching base consistently.

Brewers Offensive Performance

Milwaukee’s 16 hits were twice the Dodgers’ total of eight.

The Brewers also reached base through 12 walks, giving the lineup numerous opportunities to create large innings. Their 21 RBI compared with nine for Los Angeles, showing how frequently Milwaukee converted baserunners into actual runs.

The team’s 9-for-18 performance with runners in scoring position was another major factor.

A .500 success rate in those situations does not mean every future game will produce the same result, but within this particular game it explains why Milwaukee transformed opportunities into runs at such a high rate.

Brice Lockridge’s Power Impact

Lockridge was one of Milwaukee’s most important offensive contributors.

His three-run home run came during the enormous fifth-inning rally. The home run was measured at 422 feet and contributed four RBI overall according to the supplied data.

That combination of power and run production made Lockridge one of the most influential Brewers hitters in the game.

The timing matters as much as the distance. A home run during a nine or 10-run inning can look like just another event in a large box score, but Lockridge’s three-run blast helped turn Milwaukee’s first scoring opportunity into a dramatic momentum shift.

Brock Ebel Adds Another Home Run

Ebel also homered for Milwaukee.

His solo home run traveled 396 feet and came during the seventh-inning offensive explosion. The Brewers scored nine times in that inning, making the home run part of another major scoring sequence.

Milwaukee therefore received home runs from two different players while also generating substantial offense without relying exclusively on the long ball.

Other Brewers RBI Contributors

The supplied data identifies several additional Milwaukee run producers:

Lockridge: 4 RBI
T. Black: 3 RBI
M. Boeve: 2 RBI
Jon Adams: 2 RBI
L. Lara: 3 RBI
C. Pratt: 2 RBI

This distribution shows that the Brewers did not depend on one hitter for all of their production.

That is one of the most useful ways to read the box score. A lineup that receives contributions from several hitters can continue producing even after a pitcher successfully limits one dangerous batter.

Dodgers Offensive Performance

Los Angeles scored nine runs on eight hits.

At first glance, that is an unusual combination because the Dodgers scored more than a run per hit. The explanation is the team’s 10 walks and two home runs.

The Dodgers therefore created plenty of opportunities despite recording only eight hits.

Their problem was converting those opportunities as efficiently as Milwaukee.

Los Angeles went 4-for-14 with runners in scoring position. Milwaukee went 9-for-18.

That 50 percent RISP conversion rate for Milwaukee was one of the clearest differences between the two teams.

Max Muncy’s Long Home Run

Muncy provided one of the Dodgers’ biggest power moments.

His home run traveled an estimated 454 feet, making it the longest home run listed in the supplied game data.

Muncy’s blast also produced one RBI in the box-score information provided.

The 454-foot distance demonstrates why raw home-run distance can add useful context to a standard box score. A home run tells you that the ball left the park, while distance provides additional information about the magnitude of the contact.

MLB’s Statcast system tracks measurements such as exit velocity, launch angle, and batted-ball distance, allowing fans to analyze contact beyond traditional statistics.

Teoscar Hernández’s Power

Hernández also homered for Los Angeles.

His home run traveled 414 feet and accounted for three RBI according to the supplied data.

Hernández’s production was important because the Dodgers were not completely shut down offensively. They scored nine runs and had two players produce home runs.

The issue was that Milwaukee’s offense eventually produced far more sustained pressure.

RISP Was One of the Biggest Differences

One of the clearest numbers in the game is the difference in performance with runners in scoring position.

Milwaukee:

9-for-18, 50.0 percent

Los Angeles:

4-for-14, 28.6 percent

That difference is significant in the context of a single game.

Milwaukee received 18 opportunities with runners in scoring position and converted half of them into hits. Los Angeles received 14 such opportunities but converted fewer than one-third.

This does not mean RISP performance alone determines a team’s offensive quality. It is highly variable from game to game. However, for this particular matchup, it provides a useful explanation for the 15-run difference.

The Brewers also recorded 21 RBI compared with nine for the Dodgers.

In practical terms, Milwaukee was better at turning its traffic on the bases into runs.

Brewers Baserunning Created Additional Pressure

The Brewers stole five bases during the game.

Rengifo recorded three stolen bases, while J. Williams added two.

The Dodgers recorded one stolen base, credited to Hye. Kim.

Five stolen bases may not explain a 24-run performance by themselves, but they demonstrate another way Milwaukee created pressure.

Successful steals can move runners into scoring position without requiring a hit. They can also change defensive positioning and create additional opportunities for subsequent hitters.

MLB defines a stolen base as a runner advancing a base without the help of a hit, putout, error, force-out, fielder’s choice, passed ball, wild pitch, or balk.

The Importance of the Fifth Inning

The fifth inning changed the entire game.

Milwaukee scored 10 runs after entering the inning with no runs.

The rally included Lockridge’s three-run home run and represented the first major offensive response from the Brewers.

A 7-0 Dodgers lead became a 10-7 Milwaukee lead after the inning.

That is an 17-run swing in terms of the scoreboard from the beginning of the inning to its conclusion.

The exact sequence matters because it demonstrates how quickly baseball games can change when a pitching staff loses command and an offense continues extending plate appearances.

Milwaukee’s 12 walks for the game are particularly important here.

Walks do not count as hits, but they create baserunners. When multiple walks are combined with hits, a single inning can become extremely difficult to control.

The Seventh Inning Created Another Breakaway

Milwaukee did not stop after taking the lead.

The Brewers scored another nine runs in the seventh inning.

Ebel’s solo home run was part of the inning, but the larger story was the volume of offense surrounding it.

By the end of the seventh, Milwaukee had scored 19 runs across the fifth and seventh innings alone.

That represents nearly 79 percent of the Brewers’ total scoring output.

This is why the final score should not be interpreted simply as a consistently dominant nine-inning performance. Milwaukee’s offense was concentrated into several explosive stretches.

Brewers Pitching Statistics

The Brewers used their pitching staff for nine innings and allowed:

8 hits
9 runs
9 earned runs
10 walks
13 strikeouts
2 home runs

Patrick received the winning decision.

His supplied line was:

3.1 innings, 5 hits, 6 earned runs, 2 strikeouts, 4 walks.

That line looks unusual for a winning pitcher because he allowed six earned runs.

The explanation is the massive offensive support Milwaukee generated later.

Patrick did not need to produce a dominant individual pitching performance for Milwaukee to win. The Brewers’ offense ultimately created a lead large enough to overcome the runs he allowed.

This is a useful reminder that a pitcher’s win-loss record and game result do not necessarily describe the quality of his individual outing.

C. Patrick’s Game Score

The supplied data lists Patrick’s Game Score at 24.

Game Score is designed to summarize a starting pitcher’s performance using several components of the outing. It should not be confused with the team’s actual score.

Patrick’s low Game Score compared with the final team result demonstrates the difference between individual pitching performance and team outcome.

Dodgers Pitching Statistics

Los Angeles pitching allowed:

16 hits
24 runs
22 earned runs
12 walks
11 strikeouts
2 home runs

Rosario received the loss.

His listed line was:

0.0 innings, 4 hits, 5 earned runs, 0 strikeouts, 0 walks.

The zero innings figure is particularly important.

A pitcher can be charged with runs while recording no outs if opposing hitters score before the pitcher records a completed out. That helps explain why Rosario was charged with five earned runs despite recording zero innings.

The Dodgers’ pitching staff also committed to a high number of walks overall. Milwaukee received 12 free passes compared with 10 issued by Brewers pitching.

However, Milwaukee’s offense was much more effective at combining those baserunners with hits and productive at-bats.

A Closer Look at the Pitching Battle

The pitching numbers show an unusual combination.

Both teams struck out more than 10 times:

Brewers pitchers: 13 strikeouts
Dodgers pitchers: 11 strikeouts

Yet both staffs also allowed double-digit walks:

Brewers: 10 walks
Dodgers: 12 walks

This means the game contained plenty of missed bats but also considerable traffic on the bases.

The difference came from what happened after runners reached base.

Milwaukee collected 16 hits against eight for Los Angeles and converted significantly more RISP opportunities.

The Brewers therefore compensated for their own 10 walks allowed by producing substantially more offense.

Errors Also Favored Milwaukee

Milwaukee committed zero errors.

Los Angeles committed three.

Errors do not always directly translate into runs, but defensive mistakes can extend innings and provide opposing hitters additional opportunities.

When a team is already giving up hits and walks, defensive errors can make it even harder to escape an inning.

In this game, the Dodgers’ three errors were part of a broader defensive and pitching problem that allowed Milwaukee’s huge rallies to continue.

The Brewers, meanwhile, completed the game without an error.

That contrast is particularly notable in a game where the final run difference was 15.

Comparing the Two Offenses

The raw offensive comparison is revealing.

Milwaukee Brewers

43 at-bats
24 runs
16 hits
21 RBI
2 home runs
12 walks
11 strikeouts
9-for-18 with runners in scoring position
5 stolen bases
0 errors

Los Angeles Dodgers

34 at-bats
9 runs
8 hits
9 RBI
2 home runs
10 walks
13 strikeouts
4-for-14 with runners in scoring position
1 stolen base
3 errors

The difference in at-bats is also worth noticing.

Milwaukee recorded 43 at-bats compared with 34 for Los Angeles. That additional offensive volume helped create more opportunities for hits, runs, and RBI.

Why the 24-9 Score Can Be Misleading

A 15-run margin naturally attracts attention, but the game was not a 24-9 mismatch from the opening pitch.

The Dodgers led 7-0 after four innings.

That fact changes the interpretation considerably.

Milwaukee’s victory came through a dramatic mid-game reversal rather than steady domination.

The Brewers scored 10 runs in the fifth, nine in the seventh, and five in the ninth.

Los Angeles, meanwhile, scored seven of its nine runs before Milwaukee had scored any.

The result therefore provides an excellent example of why baseball analysis should consider inning-by-inning scoring rather than relying only on the final score.

Most Important Player Statistics

Based on the supplied game information, several individual statistics stand out.

B. Lockridge

Lockridge recorded four RBI and hit a three-run home run during Milwaukee’s fifth-inning explosion.

His 422-foot home run was one of the game’s defining offensive plays.

B. Ebel

Ebel hit a 396-foot home run and contributed during Milwaukee’s nine-run seventh inning.

His home run gave the Brewers another power event during a game already dominated by offensive production.

M. Muncy

Muncy’s 454-foot home run was the longest home run listed in the game data.

Although the Dodgers ultimately lost by 15 runs, the long ball was one of their most notable individual offensive moments.

T. Hernández

Hernández hit a 414-foot home run and recorded three RBI.

His production helped the Dodgers reach nine runs despite finishing with only eight hits.

L. Rengifo

Rengifo stole three bases, giving him the highest stolen-base total in the game.

That performance contributed to Milwaukee’s aggressive baserunning approach.

J. Williams

Williams stole two bases and also recorded a double according to the supplied data.

His combination of extra-base hitting and baserunning added another dimension to Milwaukee’s attack.

What the Player Stats Tell Us About Offensive Efficiency

One of the most useful conclusions from this game is that hitting performance cannot be measured by home runs alone.

Both teams hit two home runs.

Yet Milwaukee scored 24 runs while Los Angeles scored nine.

The difference came from the accumulation of smaller events:

More hits
More RBI
More walks
More stolen bases
Better RISP results
More at-bats
Fewer errors
Two enormous scoring innings

This is precisely why a complete box-score analysis is more useful than looking at the home-run column by itself.

Understanding the Home Run Numbers

The home-run total was identical at two apiece.

Milwaukee’s home runs came from Lockridge and Ebel.

Los Angeles’ home runs came from Muncy and Hernández.

The listed distances were:

Player	Team	Home Run Distance
M. Muncy	Dodgers	454 feet
B. Lockridge	Brewers	422 feet
T. Hernández	Dodgers	414 feet
B. Ebel	Brewers	396 feet

Muncy’s 454-foot shot was the longest of the four.

However, the Brewers’ two home runs came within much larger offensive innings, illustrating why the context surrounding a home run can be as important as the distance itself.

Spring Training Context Matters

This was a Spring Training game, and that context should remain central when interpreting the statistics.

Spring Training games are not equivalent to regular-season games in terms of roster management, pitching plans, playing-time distribution, or competitive objectives.

MLB’s statistical system separately tracks Spring Training statistics, and its qualification standards also distinguish Spring Training from the regular season.

That means readers should be careful about drawing long-term conclusions from one exhibition result.

A 24-9 score is still an important record of what happened in the game, but it does not automatically establish how either team will perform over a full regular season.

How to Read These Player Stats Correctly

When analyzing a game like this, a useful approach is to move through the numbers in layers.

Start With the Team Totals

Look at runs, hits, errors, walks, strikeouts, home runs, and RBI.

These numbers establish the broad shape of the game.

Then Examine Situational Hitting

RISP statistics help explain whether teams converted scoring opportunities.

Here, Milwaukee’s 9-for-18 performance was substantially more productive than Los Angeles’ 4-for-14 result.

Then Examine Pitching Command

Walk totals provide important context.

Both teams issued at least 10 walks, which indicates that neither pitching staff consistently avoided free baserunners.

Finally, Look at Timing

The inning-by-inning score explains the dramatic change.

Milwaukee’s 10-run fifth and nine-run seventh were the decisive scoring periods.

This layered approach produces a more useful interpretation than simply stating that Milwaukee won 24-9.

What Fantasy Baseball Readers Can Learn

A single Spring Training game should not be treated as a complete fantasy evaluation.

However, box-score details can still identify the types of performance worth monitoring.

Power production is obvious from the home runs.

Plate discipline is visible through walks.

Baserunning value appears through stolen bases.

Situational hitting appears through RBI and RISP production.

Pitching command can be evaluated through walks and strikeouts.

MLB’s standard statistics include many of these categories, while advanced statistics can provide additional context when a larger sample is available.

The most responsible approach is to use this game as one data point rather than treating it as a complete player projection.

Why the Brewers’ 16 Hits Matter

Sixteen hits against eight is one of the clearest indicators of Milwaukee’s offensive volume.

The Brewers also produced a double from J. Williams.

The Dodgers recorded two doubles from E. Alfonzo.

Extra-base hits matter because they can move runners multiple bases without requiring several consecutive singles.

Milwaukee combined its hits with walks and stolen bases, creating multiple paths to scoring.

That diversity was central to the final result.

The Role of Walks in the Game

The Brewers drew 12 walks.

The Dodgers drew 10.

At first glance, that difference might seem relatively small.

But the more important question is what each team did after receiving those opportunities.

Milwaukee’s 12 walks contributed to an offense that also produced 16 hits.

That combination meant the Brewers repeatedly had multiple runners on base.

Los Angeles also benefited from 10 walks, but its eight hits and 4-for-14 RISP performance limited the extent to which those opportunities became runs.

Strikeouts Did Not Tell the Whole Story

Milwaukee struck out 11 times.

Los Angeles struck out 13 times.

The difference was only two strikeouts.

Yet the run difference was 15.

This demonstrates why strikeouts alone cannot explain the result.

Both teams generated strikeouts and walks. The larger difference came from hits, situational execution, baserunning, and the timing of offensive rallies.

A box score becomes more informative when several categories are examined together.

Defensive Performance

The defensive comparison was straightforward.

Milwaukee recorded zero errors.

Los Angeles recorded three.

The Brewers also benefited from an offense that put constant pressure on the Dodgers’ defense.

Errors become especially costly when they occur during innings in which runners are already reaching base through hits and walks.

The three-error difference therefore adds another layer to the game’s story.

A Statistical Summary of the Decisive Factors

The biggest differences were:

Milwaukee had 16 hits compared with eight for Los Angeles.
Milwaukee scored 21 RBI compared with nine.
Milwaukee went 9-for-18 with runners in scoring position.
Los Angeles went 4-for-14 with runners in scoring position.
Milwaukee stole five bases compared with one.
Milwaukee committed no errors.
Los Angeles committed three errors.
Milwaukee scored 10 runs in the fifth inning.
Milwaukee scored nine runs in the seventh inning.
Milwaukee scored 24 runs overall.

Taken together, these numbers explain the final score far better than any single statistic.

Dodgers vs Milwaukee Brewers Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways

The dodgers vs milwaukee brewers match player stats reveal an unusual Spring Training game defined by extreme offensive swings.

Los Angeles had the better opening.

The Dodgers scored seven runs during the first four innings and appeared to have control of the contest.

Milwaukee then completely changed the game.

The Brewers scored 10 runs in the fifth inning, nine in the seventh, and five in the ninth. They finished with 16 hits, 21 RBI, 12 walks, five stolen bases, and zero errors.

The Dodgers finished with eight hits, nine RBI, 10 walks, two home runs, one stolen base, and three errors.

The two teams hit the same number of home runs, but Milwaukee created substantially more overall offensive production.

The most important individual power numbers included Muncy’s 454-foot home run, Lockridge’s 422-foot blast, Hernández’s 414-foot homer, and Ebel’s 396-foot shot.

From the pitching side, C. Patrick earned the win despite allowing six earned runs in 3.1 innings. J. Rosario was charged with the loss after allowing five earned runs without recording an out.

Those pitching lines show why the win-loss result should never be interpreted in isolation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the Brewers and Dodgers?

The Milwaukee Brewers defeated the Los Angeles Dodgers 24-9 in the Spring Training matchup recorded under Game ID 401833228.

How many hits did the Brewers have?

The Brewers recorded 16 hits, compared with eight hits for the Dodgers.

Who hit the longest home run in the game?

Muncy hit the longest home run listed in the supplied game data, with a distance of 454 feet.

Who hit home runs for the Brewers?

Lockridge and B. Ebel hit home runs for Milwaukee.

Who had the most stolen bases?

Rengifo led the game with three stolen bases. J. Williams added two for Milwaukee, while Hye. Kim had one for Los Angeles.

How many runs did Milwaukee score in the fifth inning?

Milwaukee scored 10 runs in the fifth inning, including a three-run home run by B. Lockridge.

Conclusion

The dodgers vs milwaukee brewers match player stats provide a detailed picture of a Spring Training game that changed dramatically after the opening four innings.

Los Angeles produced seven early runs, but Milwaukee responded with two enormous offensive innings. The Brewers finished with 16 hits, 21 RBI, 12 walks, five stolen bases, and nine hits in 18 opportunities with runners in scoring position.

The Dodgers still produced nine runs and hit two home runs, including M. Muncy’s 454-foot blast and T. Hernández’s 414-foot home run. However, their eight hits, 4-for-14 RISP performance, and three errors left them unable to match Milwaukee’s offensive surge.

The most useful lesson from the box score is that the final result was created by a combination of factors rather than one statistic. Milwaukee’s success came from its ability to create baserunners, generate hits, run aggressively, convert scoring opportunities, and capitalize during high-volume innings.

Because this was Spring Training, the statistics are best viewed as a detailed record of this particular game rather than a standalone forecast of regular-season performance. The box score nevertheless provides plenty of useful information for readers studying player production, situational hitting, pitching command, power, and baserunning.