Milwaukee Bucks vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats

Milwaukee Bucks vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats

The milwaukee bucks vs charlotte hornets match player stats from their November 2025 NBA Cup meeting tell the story of a game that was far more competitive than the final 147-134 score suggests. Charlotte and Milwaukee traded momentum throughout regulation before the Bucks dominated overtime, turning a tightly contested matchup into a 13-point victory at Fiserv Forum. Milwaukee finished the night shooting an exceptional 65% from the field and 59% from three, while Charlotte received 32-point performances from both Miles Bridges and rookie Kon Knueppel.

For readers looking beyond the final score, the box score offers several important details. Giannis Antetokounmpo returned to produce 25 points, 18 assists and 7 rebounds. Kyle Kuzma led Milwaukee in scoring with 29 points and added 10 rebounds and 5 assists. Myles Turner made six three-pointers, while Ryan Rollins scored 20 points on 8-of-12 shooting.

Charlotte also had plenty of individual production. Bridges scored 32 points on 12-of-24 shooting, Knueppel matched him with 32 points on 12-of-20 shooting, and LaMelo Ball delivered 16 points and 10 assists. Moussa Diabate recorded a 15-point, 11-rebound double-double.

The game was officially played on November 14, 2025, in Milwaukee, although some databases display November 15 because of time-zone or listing conventions. The NBA’s official game record lists the matchup as a 147-134 overtime win for Milwaukee at Fiserv Forum.

Milwaukee Bucks vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The matchup was part of NBA Cup group play and featured the second game of a home-and-home sequence between the two teams.

The Bucks entered with an 8-5 record, including a 5-2 home mark in the supplied game data. Charlotte entered at 4-8 and 1-5 on the road.

The final score was:

Team Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 OT Final
Charlotte Hornets 33 36 29 31 5 134
Milwaukee Bucks 34 27 42 26 18 147

The most important number is not simply the 13-point final margin. It is the 18-5 overtime advantage.

Charlotte had enough offense to remain level with Milwaukee through regulation. The Hornets scored 31 points in the fourth quarter and forced overtime. But once the extra period began, Milwaukee’s efficiency, shot-making and playmaking separated the teams.

The NBA game record also reports 11 ties and 32 lead changes during the contest, illustrating how little separation existed for much of regulation.

Game Details

  • Matchup: Charlotte Hornets vs Milwaukee Bucks
  • Date: November 14, 2025
  • Venue: Fiserv Forum, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Attendance: 17,341
  • Final: Milwaukee 147, Charlotte 134
  • Result: Milwaukee won in overtime
  • Game ID: 401809785
  • Competition: NBA Cup group play
  • Series after the game: 1-1
  • Officials: James Williams, Jacyn Goble and Michael Smith

The official NBA listing confirms the attendance, venue, final score and overtime result.

Milwaukee Bucks Player Stats

Milwaukee’s statistical profile was built around efficient shooting, elite passing and a balanced scoring attack.

The Bucks made 55 of 85 field-goal attempts, good for 65%. They also converted 20 of 34 three-point attempts, an outstanding 59% rate.

That shooting efficiency made a major difference because Charlotte actually scored efficiently itself. The Hornets made 47 of 98 field goals and 17 of 45 three-pointers.

The difference was volume combined with efficiency. Milwaukee attempted 85 shots and made 55. Charlotte attempted 98 and made 47.

Giannis Antetokounmpo

Giannis Antetokounmpo produced one of the most notable all-around statistical performances of the game:

  • 25 points
  • 7 rebounds
  • 18 assists
  • 12-of-18 field goals
  • 1-of-3 three-pointers
  • 1-of-3 free throws
  • 7 turnovers
  • 2 steals
  • 1 block

The headline number is the 18 assists.

Giannis did not need to dominate the scoring column to control the game offensively. His 12-of-18 shooting gave Milwaukee efficient scoring, while his passing created opportunities for teammates.

The Bucks had multiple shooters and finishers around him, allowing his playmaking to become a central part of the offense.

His seven turnovers are also worth noting. They do not erase the value of the 18 assists, but they show the tradeoff that can come with giving one player so much responsibility for initiating offense.

According to the official box score, Giannis finished with a +18 plus-minus.

Kyle Kuzma

Kyle Kuzma led Milwaukee in scoring with:

  • 29 points
  • 10 rebounds
  • 5 assists
  • 11-of-17 field goals
  • 2-of-4 three-pointers
  • 5-of-7 free throws
  • 4 steals

Kuzma’s 11-of-17 shooting was particularly important because it provided Milwaukee with efficient scoring alongside Giannis.

His 10 rebounds also gave the Bucks additional possession value, while five assists showed that his contribution extended beyond finishing plays.

The official game record lists Kuzma as Milwaukee’s scoring leader and rebound leader.

Myles Turner

Myles Turner was one of the most important spacing pieces in the matchup.

He finished with:

  • 18 points
  • 3 rebounds
  • 1 assist
  • 6-of-9 field goals
  • 6-of-8 three-pointers

The six made threes stand out immediately.

Turner shot 75% from three on eight attempts, creating a major problem for a Charlotte defense that already had to account for Giannis’ interior presence.

This combination matters tactically. When a team has a player who can attack the paint at Giannis’ level and another big who can shoot six threes, defenders face difficult choices.

Turner’s shooting also became especially important in overtime, when Milwaukee pulled away.

Ryan Rollins

Ryan Rollins added another efficient scoring performance:

  • 20 points
  • 8 rebounds
  • 4 assists
  • 8-of-12 field goals
  • 4-of-6 three-pointers

Rollins shot 66.7% from the field and 66.7% from three.

His 20 points meant Milwaukee had five starters in double figures, with the starting group combining for 105 points.

That balance reduced Charlotte’s ability to focus exclusively on Giannis or Kuzma.

AJ Green

AJ Green finished with:

  • 13 points
  • 2 assists
  • 2-of-4 three-pointers
  • 7-of-7 free throws

His perfect free-throw shooting was particularly efficient, and his perimeter shooting contributed to Milwaukee’s overall 59% three-point performance.

Bobby Portis

Bobby Portis supplied 12 points, 4 rebounds and 1 assist.

He also made 2 of 4 attempts from three-point range.

Portis’ shooting added another layer to Milwaukee’s spacing, allowing the Bucks to maintain offensive threats beyond their primary scorers.

Gary Harris

Gary Harris scored 10 points and added:

  • 3 rebounds
  • 5 assists
  • 2 steals

His five assists from a secondary role helped Milwaukee reach 37 total assists.

Gary Trent Jr.

Gary Trent Jr. finished with:

  • 8 points
  • 1 assist
  • 3-of-5 field goals
  • 1-of-1 three-pointer
  • 1-of-1 free throw

Although his scoring total was modest, his 60% field-goal shooting contributed to Milwaukee’s strong overall efficiency.

Charlotte Hornets Player Stats

Charlotte’s individual numbers show why the Hornets were able to push the game into overtime.

The Hornets had two 32-point scorers, a 10-assist performance from LaMelo Ball and a double-double from Moussa Diabate.

Their offense was productive enough to score 134 points.

The issue was that Milwaukee’s shooting efficiency and overtime execution eventually created separation.

Miles Bridges

Miles Bridges scored:

  • 32 points
  • 7 rebounds
  • 2 assists
  • 12-of-24 field goals
  • 6-of-15 three-pointers
  • 2-of-2 free throws

Bridges reached 32 points while attempting 24 field goals.

His six made three-pointers were also significant. He gave Charlotte a reliable perimeter scoring source while contributing seven rebounds.

Bridges’ 50% field-goal shooting was solid, although his three-point percentage was 40%.

Kon Knueppel

Kon Knueppel matched Bridges with 32 points.

His line was:

  • 32 points
  • 3 rebounds
  • 3 assists
  • 12-of-20 field goals
  • 4-of-9 three-pointers
  • 4-of-5 free throws
  • 3 steals

Knueppel shot 60% from the field, making his scoring especially efficient.

His performance was also notable because the game represented his first NBA appearance in Milwaukee, where he had local connections. The NBA and Associated Press reported that he scored a season-high 32 points in the matchup.

Knueppel’s late three-point shooting was central to Charlotte’s fourth-quarter comeback. He hit two tying three-pointers late in regulation, including one that tied the game at 129 with 21 seconds remaining.

LaMelo Ball

LaMelo Ball recorded:

  • 16 points
  • 3 rebounds
  • 10 assists
  • 5-of-15 field goals
  • 2-of-6 three-pointers
  • 4-of-5 free throws

The most important number in his box score is 10 assists.

Ball served as Charlotte’s main creator, helping generate offense for Bridges, Knueppel and Diabate.

His shooting efficiency was less impressive than Knueppel’s or Bridges’, but the playmaking contribution was substantial.

Charlotte finished with 31 team assists, meaning Ball accounted for almost one-third of the team’s total.

Moussa Diabate

Moussa Diabate posted a double-double:

  • 15 points
  • 11 rebounds
  • 1 assist
  • 5-of-8 field goals
  • 5-of-6 free throws

Diabate’s 11 rebounds tied him with no other Charlotte player and made him a major contributor on the glass.

Six of those rebounds came on the offensive end, according to the official box score.

That offensive rebounding was valuable because extra possessions can offset poor shooting stretches and create second-chance points.

Sion James

Sion James finished with:

  • 12 points
  • 7 rebounds
  • 3 assists
  • 5 steals

The five steals were especially notable.

James provided defensive activity while also contributing seven rebounds, making his box score more balanced than his 12-point scoring total alone suggests.

Collin Sexton

Collin Sexton added:

  • 14 points
  • 1 rebound
  • 4 assists
  • 2-of-3 three-pointers

His perimeter shooting gave Charlotte another source of scoring from the bench.

Tre Mann

Tre Mann recorded:

  • 9 points
  • 7 rebounds
  • 7 assists

Mann came close to a triple-double, missing the milestone by only four points and three assists.

His seven assists also helped Charlotte maintain its 31-assist team total.

Milwaukee Bucks vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats: Team Comparison

The team numbers reveal the biggest reasons the game ended with Milwaukee ahead.

Category Charlotte Milwaukee
Points 134 147
Field Goals 47-98 55-85
FG% 48% 65%
Three-Pointers 17-45 20-34
3PT% 38% 59%
Free Throws 23-29 17-22
FT% 79% 77%
Rebounds 39 39
Assists 31 37
Turnovers 13 22
Steals 11 10
Blocks 1 3

At first glance, the turnover numbers are surprising.

Milwaukee committed 22 turnovers compared with 13 by Charlotte.

That usually creates a major concern because turnovers can produce transition opportunities for the opponent. Yet the Bucks overcame the turnover disadvantage with dramatically better shooting.

Milwaukee made eight more field goals despite attempting 13 fewer shots.

That is one of the clearest statistical explanations for the result.

Milwaukee’s 65% Shooting Was the Difference

Milwaukee’s 55-of-85 shooting works out to 64.7%.

Charlotte’s 47-of-98 shooting works out to 48.0%.

The difference is enormous.

Charlotte actually attempted 13 more field goals, but Milwaukee made eight more.

This means the Bucks generated more value from each shooting opportunity.

Three-point shooting amplified the difference.

Milwaukee made 20 of 34 three-point attempts.

Charlotte made 17 of 45.

That is only a three-make difference, but Milwaukee required 11 fewer attempts to reach that total.

The Bucks therefore combined high three-point volume with exceptional accuracy.

Equal Rebounding

Both teams finished with 39 rebounds.

That means the glass did not decide this game.

Charlotte had strong individual rebounding performances from Diabate, Bridges and Mann, while Milwaukee received 10 rebounds from Kuzma, eight from Rollins and seven from Giannis.

Since the teams finished level in total rebounds, the more meaningful separation came from shooting and passing.

Milwaukee Created More Assists

Milwaukee finished with 37 assists.

Charlotte had 31.

That six-assist advantage fits the broader picture.

Giannis recorded 18 assists by himself, while Kuzma had five and Harris had five.

The Bucks therefore generated offense through multiple creators rather than relying on one player to finish every possession.

The Overtime Numbers Explain the Final Score

Regulation ended with both teams at 129.

Charlotte then scored only five points in overtime.

Milwaukee scored 18.

That produced the final 147-134 margin.

The 18-5 overtime differential is therefore responsible for the majority of the final separation.

Milwaukee did not simply win overtime because Charlotte suddenly stopped producing shots. The Bucks also made several high-value plays that created an early advantage.

Reuters reported that Myles Turner opened overtime with back-to-back three-pointers before Milwaukee extended the run.

That sequence is important because it demonstrates how quickly a close NBA game can change.

A tie game entering overtime can become a double-digit lead after only a few possessions.

The Bucks’ ability to turn their shooting strength into immediate overtime production was one of the defining features of the matchup.

Quarter-by-Quarter Analysis

First Quarter

Milwaukee led 34-33 after the opening quarter.

The one-point margin established the pattern for the game.

Neither team was able to create an early cushion.

Second Quarter

Charlotte won the second quarter 36-27.

That nine-point advantage gave the Hornets a 69-61 halftime lead.

For Milwaukee, this was the first significant warning sign.

Charlotte’s offense was functioning efficiently enough to create separation despite playing on the road.

Third Quarter

Milwaukee responded emphatically.

The Bucks scored 42 points in the third quarter while Charlotte scored 29.

That 13-point swing completely changed the game.

Milwaukee entered the fourth quarter with a 103-98 lead.

The third quarter is one of the clearest examples of why the final score should not be analyzed without looking at game flow.

Fourth Quarter

Charlotte answered again.

The Hornets scored 31 points in the fourth quarter.

Milwaukee scored 26.

That five-point advantage brought Charlotte back into the game and forced overtime.

Knueppel’s late shooting was especially important during the closing minutes.

Overtime

Milwaukee dominated the extra period 18-5.

Turner’s perimeter shooting helped ignite the Bucks, while the team continued to benefit from Giannis’ playmaking and Kuzma’s scoring.

The result was a 13-point overtime victory.

What the Player Stats Reveal About Each Offense

The milwaukee bucks vs charlotte hornets match player stats show two different approaches to generating points.

Charlotte relied heavily on individual shot creation.

Bridges and Knueppel each scored 32.

Ball generated 10 assists.

Diabate added efficient interior production.

This created a balanced scoring structure, but Charlotte’s offense was more dependent on high-volume individual scoring.

Milwaukee’s offense was more distributed.

Kuzma scored 29.

Giannis scored 25 while producing 18 assists.

Rollins scored 20.

Turner scored 18.

Green scored 13.

Portis scored 12.

Harris scored 10.

That balance meant Charlotte had to defend multiple scoring threats.

If a defender focused on Giannis, Milwaukee could create perimeter opportunities.

If Charlotte stayed home on shooters, Giannis could attack or facilitate.

That is one of the most useful insights from this box score.

Shooting Efficiency vs Shot Volume

A common mistake when reading basketball statistics is assuming that more attempts automatically mean better offense.

This game demonstrates why efficiency matters.

Charlotte attempted 98 field goals.

Milwaukee attempted 85.

Charlotte therefore had 13 more field-goal attempts.

Yet Milwaukee made 55 shots compared with Charlotte’s 47.

The Bucks made eight more shots on 13 fewer attempts.

That is an enormous efficiency advantage.

The difference was even clearer from three-point range.

Charlotte:

17-of-45, 38%

Milwaukee:

20-of-34, 59%

Milwaukee made three more threes while attempting 11 fewer.

This combination of accuracy and shot selection helped the Bucks overcome their 22 turnovers.

The Role of Giannis’ Playmaking

Giannis’ 18 assists deserve special attention because they changed the way Milwaukee could attack.

A player can influence a game without taking the most shots.

Giannis attempted 18 field goals, fewer than Bridges and Knueppel, yet he created scoring opportunities throughout the lineup.

His 18 assists accounted for nearly half of Milwaukee’s 37 assists.

That means his value in this matchup was not captured by his 25 points alone.

The passing also helped maximize Milwaukee’s shooting talent.

Turner made six threes.

Rollins made four.

Green made two.

Kuzma made two.

Portis made two.

When a team has this many perimeter contributors, an elite playmaker can amplify the entire offense.

Charlotte’s Two 32-Point Performers

Charlotte’s scoring distribution was impressive.

Bridges and Knueppel each scored 32, combining for 64 points.

That was nearly 48% of Charlotte’s 134 total points.

The pair also combined for:

  • 24 made field goals
  • 39 field-goal attempts
  • 10 made three-pointers
  • 24 three-point attempts
  • 10 rebounds
  • 5 assists
  • 3 steals

Knueppel was particularly efficient, shooting 60% from the field.

Bridges shot 50%.

The Hornets therefore received strong performances from their primary scoring options.

The challenge was sustaining that offensive production when the game entered overtime.

Why LaMelo Ball’s 10 Assists Matter

Ball’s 10 assists provide context that cannot be captured by his 16 points.

Charlotte had 31 assists overall.

Ball contributed 10.

That means he directly facilitated a significant share of Charlotte’s made baskets.

His role was especially important because Charlotte had multiple players capable of scoring.

A creator such as Ball can make the offense less predictable by allowing Bridges, Knueppel and Diabate to receive the ball in different areas of the floor.

His 5-of-15 shooting, however, shows that his offensive contribution came more from playmaking than scoring efficiency on this night.

The Bench Battle

Milwaukee received meaningful production beyond its starting lineup.

Bobby Portis scored 12.

Gary Harris scored 10.

Gary Trent Jr. added 8.

Charlotte’s bench included Collin Sexton’s 14 points and Tre Mann’s 9 points, 7 rebounds and 7 assists.

The bench numbers were not the sole reason Milwaukee won, but they contributed to the broader depth of the game.

The Bucks finished with six players in double figures, while Charlotte had five players reach double figures.

That distribution gave Milwaukee more ways to maintain scoring pressure.

What Fans Should Take From the Box Score

If you are checking the milwaukee bucks vs charlotte hornets match player stats to understand who actually influenced the game, several conclusions stand out.

First, Kuzma was Milwaukee’s leading scorer with 29 points.

Second, Giannis was the central playmaker with 18 assists.

Third, Turner was a major spacing threat with six made threes.

Fourth, Rollins provided 20 points on highly efficient shooting.

For Charlotte, Bridges and Knueppel were the primary scoring engines with 32 points each.

Ball was the main facilitator with 10 assists.

Diabate controlled the glass with 11 rebounds.

Sion James contributed five steals and seven rebounds.

The box score therefore shows that the game was not simply about one superstar.

It was a matchup involving multiple high-impact performances on both sides.

How to Read These Stats More Effectively

For readers who regularly search for NBA player statistics, it helps to move beyond points per game.

A useful five-step approach is:

  1. Check scoring efficiency.
    Compare field goals made and attempted rather than looking only at points.
  2. Check three-point production.
    A player who makes four threes on six attempts has a different offensive impact from someone who makes four on 12.
  3. Look at playmaking.
    Assists reveal which players are creating opportunities for teammates.
  4. Check rebounding and defensive activity.
    Rebounds, steals and blocks help explain contributions that scoring does not capture.
  5. Study team-level efficiency.
    Individual performances matter, but shooting percentages and turnovers often explain why one team wins.

Using this approach makes the milwaukee bucks vs charlotte hornets match player stats much more useful than a simple list of points.

A Closer Look at the Most Important Numbers

Several figures deserve to be remembered from this matchup:

147

Milwaukee’s final point total.

134

Charlotte’s final point total.

18

Giannis Antetokounmpo’s assists.

29

Kyle Kuzma’s points.

32

The scoring total for both Miles Bridges and Kon Knueppel.

20

Ryan Rollins’ points.

18

Myles Turner’s points.

11

Moussa Diabate’s rebounds.

10

LaMelo Ball’s assists.

59%

Milwaukee’s three-point shooting.

65%

Milwaukee’s overall field-goal percentage.

18-5

Milwaukee’s overtime scoring advantage.

These numbers collectively explain the game much better than the final score alone.

Historical Context of the Matchup

The game was part of a home-and-home sequence.

Charlotte had defeated Milwaukee 111-100 in the previous meeting, with Giannis unavailable for that contest. Milwaukee then responded with the 147-134 overtime victory in the second game.

That made the two-game sequence a split.

The result also put the season head-to-head series at 1-1 after this meeting.

The NBA Cup context added another layer because both teams were competing within East Group C.

The official NBA record lists the game as NBA Cup group play and shows Milwaukee improving to 2-0 in its group while Charlotte fell to 0-2 in group play.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who led the Milwaukee Bucks in scoring against the Charlotte Hornets?

Kyle Kuzma led Milwaukee with 29 points. He also recorded 10 rebounds and 5 assists.

Who led the Charlotte Hornets in scoring?

Miles Bridges and Kon Knueppel each scored 32 points, giving Charlotte two players tied for the team scoring lead.

How many assists did Giannis Antetokounmpo have?

Giannis Antetokounmpo recorded 18 assists along with 25 points and 7 rebounds.

How many points did LaMelo Ball score?

LaMelo Ball scored 16 points and added 10 assists and 3 rebounds.

Who had the most rebounds for Charlotte?

Moussa Diabate led Charlotte with 11 rebounds while scoring 15 points.

What was the final score of the game?

The Milwaukee Bucks defeated the Charlotte Hornets 147-134 in overtime. The game was played at Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee.

Conclusion

The milwaukee bucks vs charlotte hornets match player stats provide a detailed picture of a high-scoring NBA Cup game decided by efficiency and overtime execution.

Charlotte received outstanding scoring from Miles Bridges and Kon Knueppel, with both players reaching 32 points. LaMelo Ball added 10 assists, while Moussa Diabate produced a double-double with 15 points and 11 rebounds.

Milwaukee’s attack was more balanced. Kyle Kuzma led the team with 29 points and 10 rebounds. Giannis Antetokounmpo delivered 25 points and an impressive 18 assists. Ryan Rollins added 20 points, while Myles Turner contributed 18 points and six made three-pointers.

The biggest team-level difference was shooting. Milwaukee converted 65% of its field goals and 59% of its threes. Charlotte shot 48% overall and 38% from three.

Rebounding was even at 39 each, while Charlotte committed fewer turnovers. Yet Milwaukee’s shooting efficiency and six-assist advantage outweighed those areas.

The decisive moment came in overtime. After regulation ended tied at 129, Milwaukee outscored Charlotte 18-5. That five-point Charlotte overtime output and 18-point Milwaukee response transformed a close game into a 147-134 final.

For anyone studying the matchup through the box score, the central lesson is clear: the result was shaped not just by scoring totals, but by how efficiently Milwaukee converted its opportunities, how effectively Giannis created shots for teammates, and how the Bucks translated those advantages into a dominant overtime period.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *