Charlotte Hornets vs Timberwolves Match Player Stats

The charlotte hornets vs timberwolves match player stats from the November 1, 2025 meeting at Spectrum Center show how Minnesota turned a six-point halftime game into a 122-105 road victory. Charlotte opened strongly and led 31-25 after the first quarter, but Minnesota responded with a major second-half surge, scoring 36 points in both the third and fourth quarters. Julius Randle led all scorers with 30 points, while Rudy Gobert controlled the glass with 15 rebounds and Jaden McDaniels and Mike Conley each recorded six assists. The official NBA record lists the game as November 1, 2025, although some reports published after midnight carried a November 2 timestamp. (ESPN)

The final score alone does not fully explain the result. Charlotte actually won the rebounding battle 45-38 and shot 89% from the free-throw line. Minnesota, however, produced a much more efficient offensive performance. The Timberwolves shot 54% from the field and 47% from three-point range, compared with 40% and 29% for the Hornets. Minnesota also committed four fewer turnovers and generated 31 assists compared with Charlotte’s 23. (ESPN)

This makes the matchup useful for more than simply identifying the top scorer. The player numbers reveal how Minnesota’s shot quality, ball movement, interior scoring, and second-half execution overcame Charlotte’s early advantage.

Game Overview

Minnesota entered the game at 2-3 and Charlotte entered at 2-3, making the matchup an important early-season test for both teams. After the result, Minnesota moved to 3-3 while Charlotte fell to 2-4. The Timberwolves also improved to 2-1 on the road, while Charlotte moved to 1-2 at home. (ESPN)

The game was played at Spectrum Center in Charlotte, North Carolina, with an announced attendance of 19,444.

Final Score

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Final
Minnesota Timberwolves	25	25	36	36	122
Charlotte Hornets	31	25	18	31	105

The quarter-by-quarter pattern is the most important part of the game.

Charlotte won the opening period by six points. The second quarter was even at 25-25, meaning the Hornets carried a six-point lead into halftime. Minnesota then completely changed the game after the break, winning the third quarter 36-18.

That 18-point third-quarter advantage effectively flipped the contest. Minnesota entered the fourth quarter ahead 86-74 and then scored another 36 points to keep Charlotte from mounting a serious comeback. (NBA.com)

Charlotte Hornets vs Timberwolves Match Player Stats

The charlotte hornets vs timberwolves match player stats show two different offensive profiles.

Minnesota relied on efficient shooting and balanced creation. The Timberwolves made 47 of 87 field-goal attempts, good for 54%. They also made 17 of 36 three-point attempts, or 47%.

Charlotte made 34 of 86 field goals, shooting 40%. From three-point range, the Hornets made 13 of 45, or 29%.

That is a substantial difference in shot efficiency.

Minnesota’s 17 made threes were particularly important because Charlotte attempted only nine fewer three-point shots but made four fewer. The Timberwolves also scored 56 points in the paint, compared with 36 for Charlotte. (ESPN)

Team Statistical Comparison

Category	Timberwolves	Hornets
Points	122	105
Field Goals	47-87	34-86
FG Percentage	54%	40%
3-Pointers	17-36	13-45
3PT Percentage	47%	29%
Free Throws	11-14	24-27
FT Percentage	79%	89%
Rebounds	38	45
Offensive Rebounds	4	10
Defensive Rebounds	34	35
Assists	31	23
Turnovers	10	14
Steals	8	4
Blocks	2	4
Points in the Paint	56	36
Fast-Break Points	15	9

The comparison reveals something important: Charlotte won several traditional hustle categories but still lost by 17.

The Hornets had seven more rebounds, six more offensive rebounds, and eight more free-throw attempts. Yet Minnesota’s field-goal efficiency and three-point shooting were strong enough to outweigh those advantages.

Julius Randle Leads Minnesota With 30 Points

Julius Randle was the central offensive figure for Minnesota.

He finished with:

• 30 points
• 7 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 12-of-19 shooting
• 3-of-6 from three-point range
• 3-of-3 from the free-throw line
• 2 turnovers
• 1 steal
• 32 minutes

Randle’s 12 made field goals were the most by any player in the game. His 63.2% field-goal percentage was also highly efficient for a high-volume scorer. (ESPN)

What stands out is that Randle did not need excessive three-point volume to reach 30 points. He attempted only six threes and made three. Much of his production came from inside the arc, where Minnesota repeatedly created favorable scoring opportunities.

His four assists also mattered because Charlotte could not treat him as a one-dimensional scorer. When defensive attention shifted toward him, Minnesota had other players capable of converting the resulting opportunities.

Randle’s plus-minus was +8, which was not the highest on Minnesota, but his offensive contribution established the scoring foundation for the win.

Rudy Gobert Controls the Rebounding Battle

Rudy Gobert produced one of the game’s most complete interior performances.

His final line was:

• 14 points
• 15 rebounds
• 5 assists
• 6-of-9 shooting
• 2 blocks
• 3 offensive rebounds
• 12 defensive rebounds
• +31 plus-minus

The 15 rebounds were a game high. Gobert also finished with two blocks, giving Minnesota a major interior defensive presence.

His plus-31 was the highest figure on either team. That number should not be treated as a standalone measure of performance, but it is useful context when combined with his rebounding, finishing, passing, and rim protection.

Gobert’s five assists are another interesting part of the box score. Minnesota did not simply use him as a traditional rim-running center. His passing contributed to a team total of 31 assists.

The Timberwolves also scored 56 points in the paint, which helps explain why Charlotte’s strong free-throw shooting did not translate into control of the game. (ESPN)

Jaden McDaniels Provides Efficient Two-Way Production

Jaden McDaniels finished with 14 points, four rebounds, six assists, and a highly efficient 6-of-10 shooting performance.

He also made both of his three-point attempts.

That 2-of-2 shooting from beyond the arc is important because it gave Minnesota another efficient perimeter option outside Randle and the guards.

McDaniels also contributed six assists, matching Mike Conley’s team-high total. He committed three turnovers and picked up six fouls, so his overall game was not perfect, but his offensive efficiency was valuable.

His final plus-minus was +5. (ESPN)

Donte DiVincenzo Adds Perimeter Scoring

Donte DiVincenzo scored 18 points while making five of 12 three-point attempts.

His complete line included:

• 18 points
• 3 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 5-of-12 from three
• 1 steal
• 31 minutes

DiVincenzo’s five made threes tied him with no other Minnesota player for the team’s highest total from beyond the arc.

His 12 attempts were also a team high.

That combination of volume and spacing helped Minnesota stretch Charlotte’s defense. Even though DiVincenzo shot only 6-of-14 overall, his three-point production created an important scoring layer around Randle and Gobert.

Naz Reid Gives Minnesota Another Scoring Option

Naz Reid also scored 18 points.

He shot 7-of-13 overall and 3-of-5 from three-point range. That 60% three-point shooting performance made him particularly effective as a floor-spacing frontcourt option.

Reid added three rebounds and one assist in 22 minutes.

Minnesota therefore had four players scoring at least 18 points:

• Julius Randle: 30
• Donte DiVincenzo: 18
• Naz Reid: 18
• Rudy Gobert: 14

Jaden McDaniels added another 14.

That distribution is significant because Minnesota did not depend on one player to carry every offensive possession.

Mike Conley and the Importance of Ball Movement

Mike Conley scored 10 points and recorded six assists.

His shooting line was efficient, with three makes on six field-goal attempts and two makes on three attempts from beyond the arc.

Conley’s six assists tied McDaniels for the team lead.

Minnesota finished with 31 assists on 47 made field goals. That works out to assists on roughly two-thirds of the team’s made baskets, a strong indicator of connected offensive play.

The Hornets recorded 23 assists on 34 made field goals.

The difference was eight assists despite Minnesota making 13 more field goals.

That is one of the clearest statistical explanations for the final margin.

Charlotte’s Miles Bridges Matches Randle’s Scoring Total

Miles Bridges was Charlotte’s leading scorer with 30 points, matching Randle’s scoring total.

Bridges finished with:

• 30 points
• 8 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 10-of-16 shooting
• 6-of-11 from three-point range
• 4-of-4 free throws
• 1 steal

His 62.5% field-goal percentage was excellent, and his six made threes were a game high.

Bridges was therefore not responsible for Charlotte’s inefficient team shooting. His individual scoring was highly effective.

The bigger issue was what happened around him.

Charlotte’s other starters did not match his efficiency. LaMelo Ball scored 18 points but shot 7-of-19. Kon Knueppel scored five points on 1-of-9 shooting, including 1-of-8 from three.

That created a difficult offensive balance for the Hornets.

LaMelo Ball Creates for Charlotte

LaMelo Ball finished with:

• 18 points
• 7 rebounds
• 8 assists
• 2-of-8 from three
• 7-of-19 field goals
• 3 turnovers
• 1 steal

His eight assists were a game high.

That number shows that Ball remained an important creator even when his own shooting efficiency was below his usual standard.

The problem was that his 7-of-19 shooting meant Charlotte received less scoring efficiency from one of its primary offensive engines.

Ball’s combination of eight assists and seven rebounds still made him one of Charlotte’s most statistically active players. But the Timberwolves’ ability to maintain offensive efficiency on the other end made it difficult for Charlotte to compensate.

Tre Mann Provides Useful Bench Scoring

Tre Mann scored 16 points in 23 minutes.

He shot 6-of-15 from the field, made two of seven three-point attempts, and finished with five assists.

His five assists were second on Charlotte behind Ball.

Mann’s contribution was important because Charlotte needed secondary creation after Minnesota began pulling away.

Sion James also shot efficiently, going 2-of-2 from three and finishing with eight points.

Moussa Diabate produced 11 points and nine rebounds in 19 minutes, while Ryan Kalkbrenner recorded six points, six rebounds, and four blocks.

The Hornets Won the Rebounding Battle

One of the more interesting parts of the game is that Charlotte actually controlled the boards.

The Hornets finished with 45 rebounds compared with 38 for Minnesota.

They also collected 10 offensive rebounds, while Minnesota had only four.

That is a seven-rebound overall advantage and a six-rebound advantage on the offensive glass.

Normally, those numbers can be a major foundation for winning.

Here, however, Charlotte’s extra possessions did not overcome its shooting disadvantage.

The Hornets made only 34 of 86 field-goal attempts. Minnesota made 47 of 87.

That means Minnesota made 13 more field goals despite taking only one additional field-goal attempt.

The difference came from efficiency rather than volume.

Three-Point Shooting Changed the Game

Three-point shooting was one of the clearest statistical separators.

Minnesota:

• 17-of-36
• 47%
• 47 points from three

Charlotte:

• 13-of-45
• 29%
• 39 points from three

Minnesota therefore made four more three-pointers while attempting nine fewer.

That is a significant efficiency advantage.

Charlotte’s 45 attempts from deep show that the Hornets were willing to use the three-point line aggressively. The issue was conversion.

Miles Bridges was outstanding from outside at 6-of-11. The rest of the team, however, struggled to match that level.

Kon Knueppel went 1-of-8 from three, while LaMelo Ball went 2-of-8 and Tre Mann went 2-of-7.

The result was a team three-point percentage of only 29%.

Free Throws Favored Charlotte

The free-throw numbers tell a different story.

Charlotte made 24 of 27 free throws for 89%.

Minnesota made 11 of 14 for 79%.

Charlotte therefore had a nine-point advantage in free-throw shooting percentage and attempted 13 more free throws.

This is important because it demonstrates that the final margin was not created by Minnesota winning every statistical category.

The Hornets had a clear advantage at the foul line.

Yet the Timberwolves’ field-goal and three-point advantages were much larger in terms of overall scoring impact.

This is why a complete box-score analysis should avoid relying on one category.

Turnovers Also Favored Minnesota

Minnesota committed 10 turnovers.

Charlotte committed 14.

That four-turnover difference helped the Timberwolves generate additional offensive opportunities and limit Charlotte’s transition chances.

The Hornets scored 20 points off Minnesota turnovers, while Minnesota scored eight points off Charlotte turnovers. (ESPN)

At first glance, that statistic might seem to favor Charlotte because it converted Minnesota’s mistakes into more points.

But Charlotte still could not translate that advantage into a win.

Minnesota’s eight steals also helped disrupt Charlotte’s possessions.

The Third Quarter Was the Turning Point

The third quarter is the clearest place to understand the game’s outcome.

Minnesota scored 36 points.

Charlotte scored 18.

That 18-point swing transformed a six-point halftime deficit into a 12-point Minnesota lead entering the fourth quarter.

Minnesota’s 36 points in the third quarter were followed by another 36 in the fourth.

This means the Timberwolves scored 72 points after halftime.

Charlotte scored 49.

The second-half difference was therefore 23 points.

That is considerably larger than the final 17-point margin because Charlotte actually outscored Minnesota by five points in the opening half.

This sequence demonstrates how quickly a basketball game can change when shooting efficiency and offensive execution improve simultaneously.

How Minnesota Turned the Game Around

Several factors explain the second-half turnaround.

1. Better Shooting Efficiency

Minnesota’s overall 54% field-goal shooting created a consistent scoring base.

2. Perimeter Conversion

The Timberwolves made 47% of their three-point attempts.

3. Multiple Scoring Options

Randle, DiVincenzo, Reid, Gobert, and McDaniels all made meaningful offensive contributions.

4. Ball Movement

Minnesota recorded 31 assists.

5. Interior Production

The Timberwolves scored 56 points in the paint.

6. Defensive Disruption

Minnesota recorded eight steals and held Charlotte to 40% shooting.

Together, these factors created a much more efficient offensive game than Charlotte could sustain.

Full Minnesota Player Statistics

The following table provides a practical reference for the main Minnesota rotation.

Player	PTS	REB	AST	FG	3PT	STL	BLK
Julius Randle	30	7	4	12-19	3-6	1	0
Jaden McDaniels	14	4	6	6-10	2-2	0	0
Rudy Gobert	14	15	5	6-9	0-0	2	2
Mike Conley	10	3	6	3-6	2-3	1	0
Donte DiVincenzo	18	3	4	6-14	5-12	1	0
Naz Reid	18	3	1	7-13	3-5	0	0
Jaylen Clark	6	1	0	3-6	0-3	1	0
Johnny Juzang	3	0	0	1-1	1-1	0	0
Terrence Shannon Jr.	2	1	0	0-1	0-1	0	0
Bones Hyland	3	1	1	1-3	1-3	0	0
Rob Dillingham	4	0	4	2-5	0-0	2	0

The official box score confirms these individual totals and the overall team line. (ESPN)

Full Charlotte Player Statistics

Player	PTS	REB	AST	FG	3PT	STL	BLK
Miles Bridges	30	8	4	10-16	6-11	1	0
Ryan Kalkbrenner	6	6	0	2-4	0-0	0	4
Collin Sexton	9	2	2	2-7	0-3	0	0
LaMelo Ball	18	7	8	7-19	2-8	1	0
Kon Knueppel	5	8	2	1-9	1-8	1	0
Moussa Diabate	11	9	1	3-5	0-0	0	0
Tidjane Salaun	2	1	1	1-5	0-4	0	0
Tre Mann	16	1	5	6-15	2-7	1	0
Sion James	8	2	0	2-3	2-2	0	0
Liam McNeeley	0	1	0	0-3	0-2	0	0

Charlotte’s official team totals were 34-of-86 from the field, 13-of-45 from three, and 24-of-27 at the free-throw line. (ESPN)

What the Plus-Minus Numbers Tell Us

Plus-minus can be misleading when used alone, but it adds useful context here.

Gobert finished at +31, the highest mark in the game.

DiVincenzo finished at +12.

Randle finished at +8.

Conley finished at +18.

McDaniels finished at +5.

For Charlotte, Sion James finished at +11 and Moussa Diabate at +5, while several starters finished in negative territory.

Ryan Kalkbrenner and Collin Sexton were both at -22.

The most important lesson is that individual scoring totals do not always correspond directly with lineup impact.

Bridges scored 30 points but finished at -5.

Randle scored the same number and finished at +8.

That does not mean plus-minus proves one player was better. It simply reflects the team’s scoring margin while each player was on the floor.

What the Matchup Reveals About Offensive Efficiency

The most useful way to interpret this game is to separate possession volume from possession quality.

Charlotte created extra opportunities through offensive rebounding and free throws.

Minnesota created more value through efficient shooting, passing, and lower turnover volume.

The Timberwolves had only four offensive rebounds, but they did not need a large number of second chances because they converted their initial opportunities at a much higher rate.

This is one of the strongest practical lessons from the game.

A team can lose the rebounding battle and still win comfortably if it is significantly more efficient with its possessions.

Why Charlotte’s 45 Rebounds Were Not Enough

Charlotte’s rebounding advantage was real.

The Hornets collected 45 total rebounds, including 10 offensive rebounds.

Moussa Diabate had nine, Bridges had eight, and Knueppel had eight.

Those numbers indicate strong activity on the glass.

But rebounding alone does not guarantee efficient scoring.

Charlotte’s 40% field-goal percentage meant many of those extra possessions were required simply to compensate for missed shots.

Minnesota, by contrast, made 54% of its field goals.

The result was a difference of 13 made baskets despite almost identical field-goal attempt totals.

Why Randle’s 30 Points Mattered

Randle’s scoring was not just a high individual number.

It arrived on 19 field-goal attempts and three free-throw attempts.

He converted 12 of his 19 field goals.

That efficiency allowed Minnesota to maintain pressure on Charlotte’s defense.

Randle also contributed seven rebounds and four assists, meaning his offensive role extended beyond finishing.

His performance became even more important because Minnesota was without Anthony Edwards in this game. ESPN’s recap reported that Edwards was sidelined with a right hamstring strain and that Minnesota had lost its previous two games against Denver and the Los Angeles Lakers. (ESPN)

That context helps explain why Randle’s offensive production was particularly significant in this matchup.

The Role of Secondary Scorers

One of the strongest characteristics of Minnesota’s performance was its scoring depth.

After Randle’s 30 points, DiVincenzo and Reid each scored 18.

Gobert and McDaniels each scored 14.

Conley added 10.

That means six Timberwolves players reached double figures.

Charlotte also had multiple double-digit scorers, including Bridges, Ball, Diabate, and Mann.

The difference was efficiency.

Minnesota’s secondary scorers generally converted a higher percentage of their opportunities, especially from three-point range.

Head-to-Head Context

This result gave Minnesota a 1-0 lead in the season series at that point.

The game was also notable because it was played in Charlotte, meaning Minnesota produced its offensive turnaround on the road.

The official NBA game record identifies the contest as Game ID 0022500143, while ESPN lists Game ID 401809998. (NBA.com)

For readers tracking team performance across the season, keeping the game ID and official box score available is useful because it reduces confusion between similarly named matchups.

A Practical Reading of the Box Score

If you are analyzing this game for fantasy basketball, team trends, player evaluation, or matchup research, several numbers deserve priority.

First, look at Randle’s 30 points on 12-of-19 shooting.

Second, look at Gobert’s 15 rebounds and five assists.

Third, note DiVincenzo’s five made threes.

Fourth, consider Ball’s eight assists despite his 7-of-19 shooting.

Fifth, compare the team’s shooting percentages rather than looking only at the final score.

Finally, look at the third-quarter differential.

That sequence provides a much clearer picture than simply saying Minnesota won by 17.

Key Statistical Takeaways

The main conclusions from the box score are straightforward.

• Minnesota won 122-105.
• Charlotte led 31-25 after the first quarter.
• The teams were tied 25-25 in the second quarter.
• Minnesota won the third quarter 36-18.
• Minnesota scored another 36 points in the fourth.
• Julius Randle led all players with 30 points.
• Miles Bridges also scored 30 for Charlotte.
• Rudy Gobert led everyone with 15 rebounds.
• LaMelo Ball led the game with eight assists.
• Donte DiVincenzo led Minnesota with five made threes.
• Charlotte won the overall rebounding battle 45-38.
• Minnesota won the field-goal percentage battle 54%-40%.
• Minnesota won the three-point percentage battle 47%-29%.
• Charlotte shot better from the free-throw line, 89%-79%.
• Minnesota committed 10 turnovers compared with Charlotte’s 14.
• Minnesota recorded 31 assists compared with Charlotte’s 23.
• Minnesota scored 56 points in the paint compared with Charlotte’s 36.

These figures explain why the final score was more decisive than the first-half scoreboard suggested.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score of the Timberwolves vs Hornets game?

Minnesota defeated Charlotte 122-105 at Spectrum Center. The official NBA record lists the game as November 1, 2025. (NBA.com)

Who scored the most points for Minnesota?

Julius Randle led Minnesota with 30 points on 12-of-19 shooting, including three three-pointers. (ESPN)

Who led the Hornets in scoring?

Miles Bridges scored 30 points for Charlotte. He shot 10-of-16 from the field and made six of his 11 three-point attempts. (ESPN)

Who had the most rebounds in the game?

Rudy Gobert led all players with 15 rebounds. He also scored 14 points, recorded five assists, and blocked two shots. (ESPN)

Who had the most assists?

LaMelo Ball led the game with eight assists. Minnesota had two players with six assists each, Jaden McDaniels and Mike Conley. (ESPN)

Why did Minnesota win despite Charlotte having more rebounds?

Minnesota won because it was much more efficient offensively. The Timberwolves shot 54% from the field and 47% from three, compared with Charlotte’s 40% and 29%. Minnesota also had more assists and fewer turnovers. (ESPN)

Conclusion

The charlotte hornets vs timberwolves match player stats provide a strong example of how shooting efficiency can outweigh advantages in rebounding and free-throw volume.

Charlotte started the game better and held a six-point halftime lead. Miles Bridges was highly efficient and finished with 30 points, while LaMelo Ball supplied eight assists and Moussa Diabate helped Charlotte control the glass.

Minnesota changed the game after halftime.

The Timberwolves scored 36 points in the third quarter and another 36 in the fourth. Julius Randle led the offensive attack with 30 points, while Donte DiVincenzo and Naz Reid each added 18. Rudy Gobert contributed 14 points and 15 rebounds, and Jaden McDaniels and Mike Conley each produced six assists.

The team statistics reinforce the individual performances. Minnesota shot 54% from the field and 47% from three-point range, produced 31 assists, committed only 10 turnovers, and scored 56 points in the paint.

Charlotte had meaningful statistical advantages of its own, particularly with 45 rebounds, 10 offensive rebounds, and 24-of-27 free-throw shooting. But those strengths did not compensate for the difference in overall shooting efficiency.

The most important lesson from the game is therefore not simply that Minnesota had more points. It is that the Timberwolves converted their possessions at a much higher rate, moved the ball effectively, and produced a decisive second-half offensive surge. That combination turned a competitive first half into a 17-point road victory.