LA Clippers vs Oklahoma City Thunder Player Stats
The la clippers vs oklahoma city thunder match player stats from the April 9, 2026 matchup tell a clear story of efficient offense, strong interior production, and a dominant first half by Oklahoma City. The Thunder defeated the Clippers 128-110 at Intuit Dome in Inglewood, California, turning a 25-point advantage into a comfortable win despite Los Angeles improving its offensive output after halftime. Chet Holmgren led Oklahoma City with 30 points and 14 rebounds, while Shai Gilgeous-Alexander added 20 points and 11 assists. For Los Angeles, Kawhi Leonard scored 20 points, with Bennedict Mathurin, Brook Lopez, and Jordan Miller also making important scoring contributions. NBA.com
The game was particularly important because it was more than another regular-season result. Oklahoma City entered the contest with a 64-16 record and secured the NBA’s best regular-season record with the victory. The Thunder also completed a 3-0 season sweep of the Clippers. NBA.com
This breakdown looks beyond the final score. It examines the major player performances, shooting efficiency, rebounding, playmaking, turnovers, quarter-by-quarter changes, and the tactical reasons Oklahoma City controlled the game.
la clippers vs oklahoma city thunder match player stats: Game Overview
The matchup took place at Intuit Dome on April 9, 2026, with 17,927 fans in attendance. Oklahoma City won 128-110.
| Category | Oklahoma City Thunder | LA Clippers |
| Final Score | 128 | 110 |
| Field Goals | 48-83 | 40-86 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 58% | 47% |
| Three-Pointers | 13-34 | 14-32 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 38% | 44% |
| Free Throws | 19-24 | 16-24 |
| Free Throw Percentage | 79% | 67% |
| Rebounds | 44 | 36 |
| Assists | 30 | 27 |
| Turnovers | 13 | 13 |
| Steals | 9 | 9 |
| Blocks | 7 | 3 |
The most important number in the table is not the three-point percentage. It is overall field-goal efficiency.
Oklahoma City made 48 of 83 field-goal attempts, or approximately 58 percent. Los Angeles made 40 of 86, or approximately 47 percent. That difference meant the Thunder converted eight more field goals while attempting three fewer shots.
The Clippers actually shot better from three-point range. Their 14-for-32 performance represented a 44 percent success rate, compared with 13-for-34 for Oklahoma City. However, the Thunder were far more effective across their entire shot profile.
That distinction is important when interpreting basketball statistics. A team can lose the three-point percentage battle and still win comfortably when it dominates two-point efficiency, free throws, rebounding, and overall shot conversion.
Chet Holmgren Dominates the Interior
Chet Holmgren was the standout performer of the game.
He finished with:
- 30 points
- 14 rebounds
- 5 assists
- 2 steals
- 4 blocks
- 10-for-13 shooting
- 3-for-4 from three-point range
- 7-for-10 from the free-throw line
- +19 plus/minus
His 10-for-13 shooting was one of the clearest indicators of Oklahoma City’s offensive efficiency. Holmgren converted approximately 77 percent of his field-goal attempts.
The combination of scoring and rebounding made his performance especially influential.
A 30-point game by itself is valuable. Adding 14 rebounds, five assists, two steals, and four blocks gives the performance a much broader impact. Holmgren influenced scoring possessions, defensive possessions, and transition opportunities.
The four blocks were particularly significant against a Clippers team that had several experienced offensive players. His defensive presence gave Oklahoma City another way to control the game without needing to rely exclusively on perimeter defense.
Holmgren’s First-Half Impact
Holmgren scored 24 points in the first half according to the official game recap. That early production helped Oklahoma City build a substantial advantage before halftime. NBA.com
The Thunder led 34-23 after the opening quarter and extended the margin with a 35-point second quarter.
That meant Oklahoma City entered halftime with a 69-49 advantage.
The Clippers eventually won the third quarter 31-25 and also scored 30 points in the fourth. However, the early deficit was too large to erase.
This is a useful lesson when reading la clippers vs oklahoma city thunder match player stats. Looking only at the final-quarter scoring can make the game appear much closer than it actually was for most of the night.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Controls the Offense
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander finished with 20 points and 11 assists.
His scoring total was lower than Holmgren’s, but his playmaking role was central to Oklahoma City’s offensive structure.
An 11-assist performance means Gilgeous-Alexander was repeatedly creating scoring opportunities for teammates. His ability to combine scoring pressure with passing gave Oklahoma City multiple ways to attack the Clippers.
The Thunder did not need Gilgeous-Alexander to carry the scoring load because Holmgren was extremely efficient and Jalen Williams contributed 18 points.
That balance matters.
When a team has one player scoring 30 points, another scoring 20, another scoring 18, and a primary ball handler producing 11 assists, the defense has fewer opportunities to concentrate on a single offensive threat.
Gilgeous-Alexander also reached at least 20 points despite sitting out the fourth quarter, according to the official recap. NBA.com
Jalen Williams Provides Reliable Secondary Scoring
Jalen Williams scored 18 points and added six rebounds and six assists.
His statistical profile demonstrates why the Thunder’s offense was not dependent on one player.
Williams shot 7-for-12 from the field, good for 58.3 percent, and made all four of his free-throw attempts. He also recorded two steals.
His six assists were particularly useful because they helped keep Oklahoma City’s offense moving while Gilgeous-Alexander operated as the primary creator.
Williams also finished with a +13 plus/minus.
That figure should not be treated as a standalone measure of performance, but in this game it fits the broader statistical picture. Oklahoma City consistently generated efficient possessions while Williams was involved.
Isaiah Hartenstein Adds Interior Value
Isaiah Hartenstein finished with 10 points and contributed to Oklahoma City’s strong interior presence.
His role was not simply about scoring.
The Thunder collected 44 total rebounds compared with 36 for the Clippers. Players such as Hartenstein helped Oklahoma City maintain its physical advantage around the basket.
The Thunder also recorded seven blocks as a team, more than twice the Clippers’ total of three.
This type of interior production can have a cascading effect. Defensive rebounds end possessions, offensive rebounds can create second chances, and rim protection can discourage efficient attempts near the basket.
Kawhi Leonard Leads the Clippers
Kawhi Leonard was the Clippers’ leading scorer with 20 points.
He reached the same scoring total as Gilgeous-Alexander, but the overall team context was different because Oklahoma City had several additional high-impact offensive contributors.
Leonard remained one of Los Angeles’ most important offensive options, particularly during the Clippers’ stronger second half.
Los Angeles scored 31 points in the third quarter and 30 in the fourth after managing only 23 and 26 points in the first two quarters.
That progression shows that the Clippers did make meaningful offensive adjustments after halftime.
The problem was the size of the initial deficit.
Leonard’s Scoring Role
Leonard’s 20 points represented the top individual scoring output for Los Angeles, but the Clippers needed a more consistent offensive contribution from the entire lineup to overcome Oklahoma City’s efficiency.
The Thunder’s defense limited Los Angeles to 47 percent shooting overall.
Although 47 percent is not an inherently poor shooting performance, it was substantially below Oklahoma City’s 58 percent.
That 11-percentage-point gap became difficult to overcome.
Bennedict Mathurin Makes an Impact
Bennedict Mathurin scored 17 points for Los Angeles.
His scoring gave the Clippers another offensive option alongside Leonard.
Mathurin was part of a group that helped Los Angeles produce 54 combined points in the second half after scoring only 49 before halftime.
That improvement demonstrates that the Clippers were not completely overwhelmed throughout the entire game.
Instead, the decisive difference was the Thunder’s early execution.
A team that falls behind by 20 points at halftime needs an exceptional second-half performance just to create a competitive finish. Los Angeles improved, but Oklahoma City continued to score efficiently enough to protect its lead.
Brook Lopez Provides 16 Points
Brook Lopez scored 16 points for the Clippers.
His contribution was important because Los Angeles needed scoring from its frontcourt to complement Leonard and Mathurin.
Lopez’s 16 points helped give the Clippers a balanced scoring distribution, but the team still struggled to match Oklahoma City’s efficiency.
The Thunder’s 58 percent field-goal shooting created too many efficient possessions for Los Angeles to overcome.
Jordan Miller Adds 16 Points
Jordan Miller also scored 16 points.
Having multiple players in double figures gave the Clippers a reasonable distribution of scoring.
However, individual scoring totals need to be considered alongside shooting efficiency and team possessions.
Los Angeles finished with 40 made field goals from 86 attempts. Oklahoma City made 48 from 83 attempts.
That eight-field-goal advantage was more significant than the Clippers’ small edge from three-point range.
John Collins Leads the Clippers in Rebounding
John Collins led Los Angeles with nine rebounds.
The Clippers finished with 36 rebounds as a team, eight fewer than Oklahoma City.
That gap mattered because rebounding determines which team controls the next possession after a missed shot.
Oklahoma City’s 44 rebounds helped the Thunder limit second opportunities for Los Angeles while also supporting transition offense.
The Thunder’s advantage was especially notable because the Clippers were playing at home.
Kris Dunn Leads Los Angeles in Assists
Kris Dunn recorded six assists, giving him the team lead in that category for the Clippers.
Los Angeles finished with 27 total assists compared with Oklahoma City’s 30.
The difference was not enormous, but it reflected a broader pattern. Oklahoma City generated slightly more collective playmaking while also shooting much more efficiently.
The Thunder therefore converted a higher percentage of the opportunities created by its passing.
Team Shooting Efficiency Decided the Game
The clearest statistical explanation for the result comes from field-goal shooting.
Oklahoma City:
- 48 made field goals
- 83 attempts
- 58 percent shooting
Los Angeles:
- 40 made field goals
- 86 attempts
- 47 percent shooting
The Thunder therefore made eight more shots despite taking three fewer attempts.
This is a major efficiency advantage.
The Clippers actually had the better three-point percentage:
- Clippers: 14-for-32, 44 percent
- Thunder: 13-for-34, 38 percent
That might initially suggest Los Angeles should have had an offensive advantage.
However, three-point accuracy was not enough to offset Oklahoma City’s performance from the field overall.
The Thunder’s ability to convert two-point opportunities at a high rate allowed it to generate more total points from its possessions.
Free-Throw Shooting Also Favored Oklahoma City
The Thunder made 19 of 24 free throws.
The Clippers made 16 of 24.
Both teams attempted exactly 24 free throws, so there was no volume advantage at the line.
The difference came entirely from conversion.
Oklahoma City’s 79 percent rate was 12 percentage points higher than Los Angeles’ 67 percent.
In a game decided by 18 points, that difference was not the primary reason for the result, but it added to the Thunder’s overall efficiency.
Rebounding Created Another Separation
The Thunder finished with 44 rebounds.
The Clippers had 36.
That eight-rebound advantage gave Oklahoma City greater control over missed shots.
Rebounding statistics are especially valuable when evaluating a game in which the teams had similar turnover totals.
Both teams committed 13 turnovers.
That means neither side gained a clear advantage from avoiding mistakes.
Instead, Oklahoma City’s edge came from what it did after shots were taken.
The Thunder shot better and collected more rebounds.
That combination gave the team control over both efficiency and possession outcomes.
Assists Show a Balanced Offensive Approach
Oklahoma City recorded 30 assists.
Los Angeles recorded 27.
The three-assist difference was relatively small, but it fits the larger picture.
Oklahoma City’s offense combined individual shot creation with ball movement.
Gilgeous-Alexander’s 11 assists were the biggest individual contribution in this category, while Jalen Williams added six and Holmgren added five.
That means three of Oklahoma City’s leading performers all contributed directly to creating scoring opportunities.
This balance is one reason the Thunder could remain efficient even when one particular player was not taking every important shot.
Turnovers Were Surprisingly Even
Both teams committed 13 turnovers.
This is one of the most useful statistics for separating the actual reason for the result from common assumptions.
The Clippers did not lose because they simply gave the ball away much more often.
The Thunder also had 13 turnovers.
Therefore, the major difference was not turnover volume.
It was what happened during the possessions each team successfully completed.
Oklahoma City shot 58 percent.
Los Angeles shot 47 percent.
That distinction is much more revealing.
Steals Were Identical
Both teams recorded nine steals.
Again, this suggests the game was not defined by one team’s ability to force significantly more live-ball turnovers.
The defensive difference was more strongly connected to Oklahoma City’s overall shot suppression and interior protection.
The Thunder recorded seven blocks.
The Clippers recorded three.
That four-block advantage contributed to Oklahoma City’s defensive presence near the rim.
Blocks Highlight Oklahoma City’s Defensive Strength
Seven blocks compared with three is a significant difference.
Holmgren alone recorded four blocks.
His combination of size, timing, and mobility gave Oklahoma City a defensive presence that could affect shots without requiring aggressive perimeter pressure on every possession.
This matters because the Clippers still shot 44 percent from three-point range.
If a team is allowing efficient three-point shooting but wants to maintain defensive control, protecting the paint becomes even more important.
Oklahoma City did that effectively enough to hold Los Angeles to 110 points.
The Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
The game changed considerably from one quarter to another.
| Quarter | Thunder | Clippers | Thunder Margin |
| 1st | 34 | 23 | +11 |
| 2nd | 35 | 26 | +9 |
| 3rd | 25 | 31 | -6 |
| 4th | 34 | 30 | +4 |
| Final | 128 | 110 | +18 |
The first half was decisive.
Oklahoma City scored 69 points.
Los Angeles scored 49.
That produced a 20-point halftime advantage.
The Clippers responded in the third quarter, outscoring Oklahoma City 31-25.
That was the strongest quarter for Los Angeles.
However, the Thunder responded with 34 points in the fourth quarter.
Instead of allowing the comeback to develop, Oklahoma City restored control late.
The official NBA game information confirms the Thunder’s 128-110 victory and the quarter-by-quarter scoring pattern. NBA.com
Why the Clippers Could Not Complete the Comeback
The Clippers’ second-half improvement was real.
They scored 61 points after halftime.
However, Oklahoma City also scored 59.
That means Los Angeles gained only two points on the Thunder across the entire second half.
The key issue was therefore the first half.
Los Angeles entered halftime down 20 points and could not generate enough of a second-half advantage to erase it.
This is why quarter-level analysis is so useful.
Looking only at the final score tells us Oklahoma City won by 18.
Looking at the quarters tells us the game was effectively shaped by the first half, while the Clippers’ second-half improvement mainly reduced the size of the defeat rather than threatening the final result.
What the Player Stats Reveal About Oklahoma City’s Offense
The Thunder’s offensive success came from several connected factors.
1. Holmgren’s Efficiency
Holmgren made 10 of 13 field-goal attempts.
A 76.9 percent shooting night from the field is extremely efficient, especially with 30 points.
2. Gilgeous-Alexander’s Playmaking
His 11 assists helped spread offensive responsibility across the lineup.
3. Williams’ Secondary Creation
Williams added 18 points and six assists.
4. Strong Team Shooting
The Thunder made 48 of 83 shots.
5. Free-Throw Conversion
Oklahoma City made 19 of 24 free throws.
The result was an offense that did not depend on three-point volume alone.
What the Player Stats Reveal About the Clippers
The Clippers’ statistics point to a team that had enough individual scoring to remain dangerous but struggled to sustain efficient offense against Oklahoma City.
Leonard led with 20 points.
Mathurin and Lopez added 17 and 16.
Miller also scored 16.
Collins led the team with nine rebounds.
Dunn led the team with six assists.
The distribution was respectable.
The problem was that the team did not convert enough of its total field-goal attempts.
Los Angeles attempted 86 field goals, three more than Oklahoma City, but made eight fewer.
That is the central statistical weakness of the performance.
Season Context and the Importance of the Result
The Thunder entered the matchup 64-16 overall and 30-9 on the road.
The Clippers were 41-39 overall and 22-18 at home.
The victory moved Oklahoma City to the NBA’s best regular-season record and secured the top seed. NBA.com reported that the Thunder had also won seven straight and 19 of their previous 20 games entering this result. NBA.com
For Los Angeles, the game came during a much more complicated late-season situation.
The Clippers were fighting around the Western Conference playoff picture, making the result more consequential than an ordinary regular-season loss.
That context helps explain why the statistical details matter.
Oklahoma City was playing with the objective of securing the league’s top record.
Los Angeles was trying to strengthen its postseason position.
The Thunder ultimately executed more efficiently.
Season Series: Oklahoma City Goes 3-0
Oklahoma City completed a 3-0 season sweep of Los Angeles.
That means the Thunder won every meeting between the teams during the regular season.
A season sweep does not automatically predict what would happen in a future postseason matchup, because playoff rotations, injuries, preparation, and game plans can change.
However, it is meaningful historical context.
Across this particular season, Oklahoma City consistently found ways to solve the Clippers.
The April 9 matchup was the clearest example because the Thunder combined elite shooting efficiency with strong rebounding and interior defense.
Attendance and Game Details
The game was played at Intuit Dome in Inglewood, California.
Attendance was listed at 17,927.
The officials were:
- Marat Kogut
- Tony Brothers
- Brandon Schwab
The official NBA record lists the matchup as Oklahoma City 128, LA Clippers 110 and identifies the game as the contest in which the Thunder clinched the No. 1 seed. NBA.com
A Practical Way to Read These Statistics
For readers researching player performance, it is easy to focus only on points.
A better approach is to evaluate at least five areas.
Scoring
Who scored the most?
Holmgren led all players with 30 points.
Efficiency
How many attempts were required to produce those points?
Holmgren’s 10-for-13 shooting stands out.
Playmaking
Who created opportunities for teammates?
Gilgeous-Alexander’s 11 assists were the highest total in the game.
Rebounding
Who controlled missed shots?
Holmgren had 14 rebounds, while Collins led the Clippers with nine.
Defensive Impact
Who influenced possessions without scoring?
Holmgren’s four blocks and two steals illustrate how his influence extended beyond scoring.
This approach provides a more complete understanding than simply ranking players by points.
Key Statistical Takeaways
The most important numbers from the game can be summarized as follows:
- Oklahoma City won 128-110.
- Chet Holmgren recorded 30 points and 14 rebounds.
- Shai Gilgeous-Alexander finished with 20 points and 11 assists.
- Jalen Williams scored 18 points and added six assists.
- Kawhi Leonard led Los Angeles with 20 points.
- Bennedict Mathurin scored 17.
- Brook Lopez and Jordan Miller each scored 16.
- Oklahoma City shot 58 percent from the field.
- Los Angeles shot 47 percent from the field.
- The Clippers shot better from three-point range, 44 percent to 38 percent.
- Oklahoma City won the rebounding battle 44-36.
- Both teams committed 13 turnovers.
- Oklahoma City recorded seven blocks compared with three for Los Angeles.
- The Thunder led by 20 points at halftime.
- Oklahoma City completed a 3-0 season sweep.
What This Game Says About Individual Value
The most useful individual performance was Holmgren’s because his impact appeared across nearly every major statistical category.
His 30 points addressed scoring.
His 14 rebounds addressed possession control.
His five assists addressed playmaking.
His two steals and four blocks addressed defense.
That makes his performance unusually complete.
Gilgeous-Alexander’s value came through a different path.
His 20 points were important, but the 11 assists demonstrated how he helped organize the offense.
Williams provided another layer with 18 points, six rebounds, and six assists.
The Thunder therefore had multiple players contributing in distinct ways.
For Los Angeles, Leonard remained the leading scorer, while Mathurin, Lopez, and Miller supplied additional offensive production. Collins and Dunn led the team in rebounding and assists respectively.
Where the Game Was Won
If the entire contest has to be reduced to a few statistical themes, three stand out.
Efficient Field-Goal Shooting
The Thunder’s 58 percent shooting was the foundation.
First-Half Execution
Oklahoma City outscored Los Angeles 69-49 before halftime.
Rebounding and Interior Defense
The Thunder won the rebounding battle by eight and recorded four more blocks.
The Clippers did shoot better from three-point range, but that advantage was not enough to overcome Oklahoma City’s superior overall efficiency.
FAQs
Who led the Thunder in the game against the Clippers?
Chet Holmgren led Oklahoma City with 30 points and 14 rebounds. He also recorded five assists, two steals, and four blocks.
Who led the Clippers in scoring?
Kawhi Leonard led the Clippers with 20 points. Bennedict Mathurin scored 17, while Brook Lopez and Jordan Miller each finished with 16.
What was the final score between Oklahoma City and the Clippers?
The Oklahoma City Thunder defeated the LA Clippers 128-110 at Intuit Dome.
Who had the most assists in the game?
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander recorded the most assists with 11. Jalen Williams had six assists for Oklahoma City, while Kris Dunn led the Clippers with six.
Which team shot better from the field?
Oklahoma City shot significantly better overall. The Thunder made 48 of 83 field-goal attempts for approximately 58 percent, while the Clippers made 40 of 86 for approximately 47 percent.
Did the Clippers shoot better from three-point range?
Yes. Los Angeles made 14 of 32 three-point attempts, or 44 percent. Oklahoma City made 13 of 34, or 38 percent.
Conclusion
The la clippers vs oklahoma city thunder match player stats show why Oklahoma City was able to secure a convincing 128-110 victory despite Los Angeles shooting better from three-point range.
Chet Holmgren was the central figure, producing 30 points and 14 rebounds while adding five assists, two steals, and four blocks. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander controlled the offense with 20 points and 11 assists, while Jalen Williams added 18 points and six assists.
For Los Angeles, Kawhi Leonard led the scoring with 20 points, supported by Bennedict Mathurin, Brook Lopez, and Jordan Miller. John Collins led the Clippers in rebounding, while Kris Dunn paced the team in assists.
The broader statistical picture was decisive. Oklahoma City shot 58 percent from the field compared with 47 percent for Los Angeles, won the rebounding battle 44-36, and recorded seven blocks against three. Both teams had 13 turnovers, so the result was primarily driven by efficiency, rebounding, and defensive execution rather than turnover disparity.
The first half ultimately determined the game. Oklahoma City built a 20-point halftime lead, and although Los Angeles responded with 31 points in the third quarter and 30 in the fourth, the Thunder continued to score efficiently enough to maintain control.
For anyone studying la clippers vs oklahoma city thunder match player stats, the biggest lesson is that individual scoring totals are only one part of the story. Holmgren’s complete statistical contribution, Gilgeous-Alexander’s playmaking, Oklahoma City’s shooting efficiency, and the team’s rebounding advantage collectively explain the final result far better than the scoring column alone.
