New England Patriots vs Tennessee Titans Match Player Stats
New England Patriots vs Tennessee Titans Match Player Stats from the October 19, 2025 matchup tell a clear story of two very different offensive performances. New England defeated Tennessee 31-13, turning a 10-3 first-quarter deficit into a convincing 18-point victory. The Patriots finished with 175 rushing yards, two passing touchdowns, five sacks on defense, and an interception, while the Titans managed only 39 rushing yards and gave up five sacks. Drake Maye delivered an efficient passing performance, Rhamondre Stevenson provided the lead production on the ground, and New England’s defense steadily changed the game after Tennessee’s fast start.
The final score alone does not fully explain how the game developed. Tennessee actually led 10-3 after the opening quarter, but New England responded with 14 points in the second quarter and another 14 in the third. The Patriots then shut out Tennessee in the fourth quarter to complete the 31-13 result.
For anyone studying the New England Patriots vs Tennessee Titans Match Player Stats, the most important point is that the game was shaped by efficiency, rushing production, quarterback pressure, and New England’s ability to turn defensive opportunities into points.
New England Patriots vs Tennessee Titans Match Player Stats at a Glance
The matchup ended with New England improving to 5-2 overall and 4-0 on the road, while Tennessee fell to 1-6 overall and 0-3 at home.
| Category | New England Patriots | Tennessee Titans |
| Final Score | 31 | 13 |
| Q1 | 3 | 10 |
| Q2 | 14 | 3 |
| Q3 | 14 | 0 |
| Q4 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Passing | 212 yards | 216 yards |
| Team Rushing | 175 yards | 39 yards |
| Passing TDs | 2 | 1 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 1 |
| Sacks Recorded | 5 | 4 |
| Defensive TDs | 1 | 0 |
| Field Goals | 1 | 2 |
| Extra Points | 4 | 1 |
At first glance, the passing numbers appear surprisingly close. Tennessee’s team passing total was listed at 216 yards compared with 212 for New England. Yet the Patriots won by 18 points.
That difference is important because football games are not decided by passing yardage alone. New England had a major advantage on the ground, winning the rushing battle 175-39. The Patriots also protected the football better, avoided interceptions, generated five sacks, and scored a defensive touchdown.
Those details provide much more context than the final passing totals by themselves.
How the Game Changed Quarter by Quarter
First Quarter: Tennessee Starts Fast
Tennessee scored 10 points in the opening quarter while New England managed only a field goal.
Joey Slye converted a 50-yard field goal, and Tennessee also reached the end zone through the passing game. The Titans therefore established an early 10-3 advantage.
A first-quarter lead can sometimes create a misleading impression when examining a final box score. That is particularly true here because the Patriots were not able to match Tennessee’s scoring pace immediately.
The key development was what happened after the opening period.
Second Quarter: New England Takes Control
New England scored 14 points in the second quarter while Tennessee added only three.
That changed the game from a 10-3 Tennessee lead to a 17-13 Patriots advantage at halftime.
The Patriots’ offense became more productive, and their ability to run the football helped create balance. Drake Maye also remained extremely efficient as a passer, completing 21 of 23 attempts.
The second quarter was therefore the first major turning point. Tennessee had started the game with momentum, but New England had taken the lead before halftime.
Third Quarter: Patriots Pull Away
The Patriots scored another 14 points in the third quarter.
Tennessee failed to score, meaning New England extended its halftime advantage from 17-13 to 31-13.
This was arguably the decisive stretch of the game. New England combined offensive production with defensive pressure and did not allow Tennessee to respond on the scoreboard.
Fourth Quarter: Defense Finishes the Job
Neither team scored in the fourth quarter.
That may look uneventful, but it is significant from a game-management perspective. New England entered the final period with an 18-point lead and did not need to keep attacking aggressively.
The Patriots’ defense preserved the advantage, while Tennessee could not generate a late scoring comeback.
The final quarter therefore confirmed what had already happened in the third: New England had created too much separation for Tennessee to overcome.
Drake Maye’s Passing Performance
Drake Maye was the most important quarterback statistic for New England.
He completed 21 of 23 passes for 222 yards, averaging 9.7 yards per attempt. He threw two touchdowns and no interceptions. His listed QBR was 96.0, while his passer rating was 135.9.
Those numbers show an efficient and accurate performance.
Maye’s Passing Line
| Statistic | Drake Maye |
| Completions | 21 |
| Attempts | 23 |
| Completion Rate | 91.3% |
| Passing Yards | 222 |
| Yards per Attempt | 9.7 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 4 |
| Sack Yards | 22 |
| QBR | 96.0 |
| Passer Rating | 135.9 |
A 21-for-23 passing line represents a completion rate of approximately 91.3%.
The most impressive part is that the accuracy was paired with explosive efficiency. Maye averaged 9.7 yards per passing attempt before accounting for sack yardage.
He also avoided an interception despite Tennessee generating five sacks as a team.
That combination matters. A quarterback can accumulate yards while still creating turnover opportunities or repeatedly putting the offense behind schedule. Maye’s line shows a much cleaner performance.
The Importance of the Sacks
The provided statistics list Maye with four sacks for 22 yards.
This creates an important distinction between passing yards and team passing production.
Maye’s individual passing total was 222 yards, while New England’s team passing figure was listed at 212 yards. The difference is the 10-yard net effect shown in the supplied team statistics.
This is why readers should not automatically assume that every passing number in a box score represents exactly the same measurement.
Individual quarterback passing yards and team net passing figures can differ because sacks are incorporated differently into team-level calculations.
Joshua Dobbs’ Limited Contribution
Joshua Dobbs attempted one pass and completed it for 12 yards.
He finished with:
- 1 completion
- 1 attempt
- 12 passing yards
- 12.0 yards per attempt
- 0 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- 100.0 QBR
- 116.7 passer rating
Dobbs also recorded two rushing attempts for minus-2 yards.
Because his role was limited, his statistics did not materially change the overall offensive profile. Maye was clearly the primary passer and handled virtually all of New England’s passing workload.
Rhamondre Stevenson Leads the Patriots’ Running Game
Rhamondre Stevenson was New England’s leading rusher.
He carried the ball 18 times for 88 yards and a touchdown, averaging 4.9 yards per carry. His longest run covered 16 yards.
Stevenson’s Rushing Numbers
| Statistic | Rhamondre Stevenson |
| Carries | 18 |
| Rushing Yards | 88 |
| Average | 4.9 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Long Run | 16 yards |
Stevenson accounted for more than half of New England’s rushing attempts among the listed primary runners.
His 88 yards also represented just over half of the Patriots’ 175 team rushing yards.
That workload was important because it prevented New England’s offense from becoming overly dependent on Maye.
Drake Maye Adds a Major Rushing Element
Maye was also New England’s second-leading rusher.
He carried eight times for 62 yards, averaging 7.8 yards per carry. His longest run went for 19 yards.
That is a significant contribution for a quarterback.
Maye’s 62 rushing yards represented a large portion of New England’s 175-yard rushing total. Combined with Stevenson’s 88 yards, the two accounted for 150 rushing yards.
That means the Patriots’ two leading rushers produced approximately 85.7% of the team’s total rushing yardage.
This is one of the clearest statistical explanations for New England’s offensive success.
New England’s Complete Rushing Breakdown
The Patriots recorded 36 rushing attempts for 175 yards, averaging 4.9 yards per carry.
| Rusher | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Rhamondre Stevenson | 18 | 88 | 4.9 | 1 | 16 |
| Drake Maye | 8 | 62 | 7.8 | 0 | 19 |
| Terrell Jennings | 5 | 18 | 3.6 | 0 | 9 |
| TreVeyon Henderson | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 | 3 |
| Mack Hollins | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 |
| Joshua Dobbs | 2 | -2 | -1.0 | 0 | -1 |
| Team | 36 | 175 | 4.9 | 1 | 19 |
The Patriots did not need one runner to produce every yard.
Stevenson supplied volume and consistency, while Maye added explosive rushing production. The supporting backs filled in smaller roles.
This balance is particularly important when interpreting the passing statistics. New England did not have to win solely through Maye’s arm.
Stefon Diggs Leads New England in Receptions
Stefon Diggs was the Patriots’ leading receiver by receptions and receiving yards.
He caught seven passes for 69 yards on seven targets. His average was 9.9 yards per reception, and his longest catch went for 24 yards.
Diggs’ Receiving Line
| Statistic | Stefon Diggs |
| Targets | 7 |
| Receptions | 7 |
| Receiving Yards | 69 |
| Average | 9.9 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Long Reception | 24 |
The most striking feature is his perfect seven-for-seven catch rate.
Diggs received 29.2% of New England’s 24 listed targets and caught 31.8% of the team’s 22 completions.
His production was not based on one huge play. Instead, he consistently converted opportunities.
That kind of receiving performance gives a quarterback a dependable target throughout a game.
Kayshon Boutte Provides the Big Play
Kayshon Boutte caught two passes for 55 yards and a touchdown.
His 27.5 yards per reception was the highest average among New England players with multiple receptions.
His longest reception went for 39 yards.
This is a good example of why reception totals should always be read alongside efficiency. Boutte had only two catches, but those two receptions generated 55 yards and a touchdown.
His contribution was therefore highly concentrated but extremely valuable.
Mack Hollins Adds Explosive Receiving Production
Mack Hollins also produced efficiently.
He caught two passes for 49 yards, averaging 24.5 yards per reception. His longest reception went for 27 yards.
Like Boutte, Hollins did not need a large target volume to create significant yardage.
The Patriots’ receiving production was therefore spread across different types of contributions. Diggs provided volume, while Boutte and Hollins supplied explosive gains.
New England Receiving Breakdown
| Receiver | Targets | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Stefon Diggs | 7 | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 0 | 24 |
| Kayshon Boutte | 2 | 2 | 55 | 27.5 | 1 | 39 |
| Mack Hollins | 2 | 2 | 49 | 24.5 | 0 | 27 |
| Hunter Henry | 5 | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 0 | 12 |
| DeMario Douglas | 3 | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 0 | 12 |
| Austin Hooper | 2 | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 1 | 8 |
| Rhamondre Stevenson | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kyle Williams | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
New England completed 22 passes and recorded 234 receiving yards in the individual receiving totals supplied for the game.
The listed team passing figure was 212 yards because the team statistic accounts for sack yardage differently. This distinction is worth highlighting because it prevents confusion when readers compare the quarterback and team sections of a box score.
Cam Ward’s Passing Performance
Cam Ward completed 25 of 34 passes for 255 yards, with one touchdown and one interception.
His listed passer rating was 92.2, while his QBR was 22.4.
Ward’s Passing Line
| Statistic | Cam Ward |
| Completions | 25 |
| Attempts | 34 |
| Completion Rate | 73.5% |
| Passing Yards | 255 |
| Yards per Attempt | 7.5 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks | 5 |
| Sack Yards | 39 |
| QBR | 22.4 |
| Passer Rating | 92.2 |
Ward’s 25 completions were more than Maye’s 21, and his individual passing yardage was higher.
Yet the Titans scored only 13 points.
That contrast demonstrates why raw passing totals cannot be used as a complete measure of quarterback effectiveness.
Ward produced 255 passing yards, but Tennessee also absorbed five sacks for 39 yards. The team passing figure supplied was 216 yards.
He also threw an interception and lost a fumble.
The result was a statistical profile with plenty of passing volume but not enough scoring efficiency.
Tennessee’s Receiving Game
Chimere Dike led Tennessee with four receptions for 70 yards and a touchdown.
He averaged 17.5 yards per reception and had a long reception of 38 yards.
That was one of the strongest individual receiving performances for either team in terms of yards per catch.
Tennessee Receiving Leaders
| Receiver | Targets | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Chimere Dike | 4 | 4 | 70 | 17.5 | 1 | 38 |
| Tony Pollard | 6 | 6 | 43 | 7.2 | 0 | 10 |
| Van Jefferson | 6 | 4 | 41 | 10.3 | 0 | 15 |
| Gunnar Helm | 4 | 4 | 36 | 9.0 | 0 | 13 |
| Elic Ayomanor | 5 | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 0 | 20 |
| Tyler Lockett | 2 | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 0 | 13 |
| Tyjae Spears | 4 | 3 | 18 | 6.0 | 0 | 11 |
| Chig Okonkwo | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
Dike’s four catches accounted for 70 receiving yards, making him Tennessee’s most productive receiver by yardage.
Tony Pollard was particularly involved as a dual-purpose player. He caught all six of his targets for 43 yards and also carried the ball six times for 18 yards.
Tennessee’s Running Game Was the Major Problem
The largest statistical weakness for Tennessee was its rushing production.
The Titans recorded only 12 rushing attempts for 39 yards, an average of 3.3 yards per carry.
| Rusher | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Tyjae Spears | 5 | 22 | 4.4 | 0 | 8 |
| Tony Pollard | 6 | 18 | 3.0 | 0 | 6 |
| Chimere Dike | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | -1 |
| Team | 12 | 39 | 3.3 | 0 | 8 |
Tennessee’s 39 rushing yards were 136 fewer than New England’s 175.
The difference in rushing volume was also enormous.
New England attempted 36 rushes, three times as many as Tennessee’s 12 attempts.
That means the Patriots had 24 more rushing attempts and 136 more rushing yards.
This was not a minor statistical difference. It was one of the defining features of the matchup.
The Patriots Won the Ground Game Decisively
The rushing comparison deserves special attention.
New England:
- 36 carries
- 175 yards
- 4.9 yards per carry
- 1 rushing touchdown
- 19-yard long run
Tennessee:
- 12 carries
- 39 yards
- 3.3 yards per carry
- 0 rushing touchdowns
- 8-yard long run
The Patriots averaged 1.6 yards more per rushing attempt.
More importantly, New England generated 175 yards from the ground while Tennessee produced only 39.
The difference was 136 yards.
That ground-game advantage gave New England a reliable offensive foundation and forced Tennessee to rely more heavily on its passing attack.
Defensive Performance: New England Creates the Difference
The Patriots’ defense recorded 53 total tackles, including 36 solo tackles.
The unit also produced:
- 5 sacks
- 6 tackles for loss
- 2 passes defended
- 5 quarterback hits
- 1 defensive touchdown
Tennessee’s defense recorded 77 total tackles and 42 solo tackles.
The Titans also produced four sacks and six tackles for loss.
However, Tennessee’s defense did not record an interception, pass defended total, or defensive touchdown in the supplied statistics.
The Patriots therefore produced the more damaging defensive plays.
Marcus Jones Records the Interception
Marcus Jones recorded New England’s only interception.
He returned it 32 yards and did not score a touchdown.
That turnover was important because Tennessee did not record an interception against Maye or Dobbs.
The turnover comparison was therefore favorable to New England.
Tennessee was charged with one interception and one lost fumble, while New England recorded no interceptions and the supplied fumble information shows no lost fumble for the Patriots.
The Defensive Touchdown Matters
New England’s defense recorded one touchdown.
That statistic deserves emphasis because defensive scoring changes the relationship between offensive and defensive performance.
A defensive touchdown means the offense does not have to generate the points associated with that scoring play.
For Tennessee, no defensive touchdown was recorded.
This is another reason the 212-216 team passing comparison does not tell the full story.
New England’s overall point production benefited from defensive impact in addition to its offensive output.
Turnovers and Ball Security
Ball security was another meaningful difference.
New England’s supplied fumble data lists K’Lavon Chaisson with zero fumbles and zero lost fumbles, with the team recovering one fumble.
Tennessee’s data lists Cam Ward with one fumble, and that fumble was lost.
Tennessee also threw one interception.
Therefore, the Titans were responsible for two listed turnovers, while New England did not lose a fumble and did not throw an interception.
Turnover margin is often one of the simplest ways to explain why two teams with relatively similar passing yardage can finish with dramatically different scores.
Special Teams Comparison
Special teams also contributed to the scoring picture.
New England Kicking
Andy Borregales went 1-for-1 on field goals and made all four extra-point attempts.
His field goal was from 36 yards.
He finished with seven points.
Tennessee Kicking
Joey Slye made both of his field-goal attempts.
His longest field goal was 50 yards, and he made one extra point.
He also finished with seven points.
This creates an interesting scoring detail: both kickers recorded seven points even though their teams scored very different totals.
New England’s 31 points came primarily through touchdowns, while Tennessee’s 13 points included two field goals.
Return Game Comparison
Efton Chism III handled New England’s listed kick returns.
He had two returns for 40 yards, averaging 20.0 yards per return. His longest return went for 24 yards.
Tennessee’s Chimere Dike recorded three kick returns for 84 yards.
He averaged 28.0 yards per return, with a long return of 31 yards.
Dike also had one punt return for 15 yards.
New England had no punt returns listed.
This means Tennessee had the stronger return averages in the supplied statistics, but that advantage did not translate into a victory.
That is another useful reminder that individual statistical advantages do not always produce a corresponding advantage on the scoreboard.
Why the Passing Numbers Can Be Misleading
One of the most interesting aspects of this game is the relationship between individual passing totals and team passing totals.
For New England, Maye was credited with 222 passing yards and Dobbs with 12, giving 234 individual passing yards.
The team passing total was listed as 212 yards.
The difference is connected to the four sacks for 22 yards.
Tennessee shows the same pattern.
Ward was credited with 255 passing yards, but the team passing figure was 216 yards after accounting for 39 sack yards.
This is not an error in the supplied statistics. It reflects the difference between gross individual passing production and team passing production after sack yardage.
For readers analyzing box scores, this is an important distinction.
A quarterback’s passing yardage and a team’s net passing yardage should not automatically be treated as interchangeable statistics.
New England’s Offensive Balance Was the Bigger Story
The Patriots’ offense produced through both the air and the ground.
Maye threw for 222 yards and two touchdowns.
Stevenson ran for 88 yards and a touchdown.
Maye added 62 rushing yards.
Diggs caught seven passes for 69 yards.
Boutte and Hollins combined for 104 receiving yards on four catches.
That is a balanced statistical profile.
New England did not need to rely on one player to create every offensive yard.
Instead, the production was distributed across:
- Quarterback passing
- Quarterback rushing
- Running back production
- High-volume receiving
- Explosive receiving plays
That balance is one of the clearest explanations for the 31-point output.
Tennessee Produced Yardage but Struggled to Convert It Into Points
Tennessee’s numbers are more complicated.
Ward threw for 255 yards.
The Titans’ receivers produced 255 receiving yards in the supplied individual receiving statistics.
Dike averaged 17.5 yards per catch.
Pollard caught all six of his targets.
Yet Tennessee finished with only 13 points.
The reason is that yardage alone does not guarantee scoring.
The Titans had:
- Only 39 rushing yards
- No rushing touchdowns
- One interception
- One lost fumble
- Five sacks allowed
- No defensive touchdown
The offense therefore had difficulty turning its passing production into enough scoring opportunities.
A Statistical Comparison of the Quarterbacks
| Category | Drake Maye | Cam Ward |
| Completions | 21 | 25 |
| Attempts | 23 | 34 |
| Completion Rate | 91.3% | 73.5% |
| Passing Yards | 222 | 255 |
| Yards per Attempt | 9.7 | 7.5 |
| TDs | 2 | 1 |
| INTs | 0 | 1 |
| Sacks | 4 | 5 |
| Sack Yards | 22 | 39 |
| QBR | 96.0 | 22.4 |
| Passer Rating | 135.9 | 92.2 |
Ward threw for 33 more yards than Maye, but he also attempted 11 more passes.
Maye’s completion rate was substantially higher.
His yards per attempt was also higher.
Most importantly, Maye threw two touchdowns without an interception, while Ward threw one touchdown and one interception.
The quarterback comparison therefore favors Maye in efficiency even though Ward had the larger raw passing-yard total.
What the Box Score Says About Offensive Efficiency
The most useful way to read this matchup is to look beyond total yardage.
New England’s offense combined:
- 212 team passing yards
- 175 rushing yards
- 387 listed team offensive yards based on the supplied team passing and rushing figures
Tennessee had:
- 216 team passing yards
- 39 rushing yards
- 255 listed team offensive yards based on the supplied team figures
That produces a 132-yard difference in the listed team offensive totals.
New England therefore had both a stronger running game and a similar passing output.
The result was an offense that could attack Tennessee in multiple ways.
What the Statistics Reveal About the Defensive Battle
New England recorded five sacks compared with Tennessee’s four.
At first, the difference of one sack may seem small.
The more important detail is what happened alongside those sacks.
The Patriots also recorded an interception and a defensive touchdown.
Tennessee did not record an interception.
New England’s defense therefore produced multiple forms of impact rather than relying solely on quarterback pressure.
The Patriots also held Tennessee scoreless in both the third and fourth quarters.
That second-half shutout was crucial.
The Second-Half Defensive Adjustment
Tennessee scored 13 points in the first half.
It scored zero in the second half.
New England scored 14 points in the second quarter and another 14 in the third, then protected its lead in the fourth.
This creates one of the strongest statistical narratives of the game:
Tennessee started better, but New England finished much better.
The Patriots’ ability to prevent second-half scoring turned a close game into a comfortable victory.
The final 31-13 score therefore does not reflect a wire-to-wire dominance. It reflects a game in which New England gradually seized control and then prevented Tennessee from recovering.
The Most Important Player Performances
Several players stand out when the full statistical picture is considered.
Drake Maye
Maye completed 21 of 23 passes for 222 yards and two touchdowns without an interception.
He also ran for 62 yards.
His combination of passing accuracy and rushing production made him one of the central figures in the victory.
Rhamondre Stevenson
Stevenson carried 18 times for 88 yards and a touchdown.
He gave New England a reliable rushing presence and helped establish the ground game.
Stefon Diggs
Diggs caught all seven of his targets for 69 yards.
His perfect catch rate made him the team’s leading high-volume receiver.
Kayshon Boutte
Boutte had only two catches, but they produced 55 yards and one touchdown.
His 39-yard reception was New England’s longest listed completion.
Cam Ward
Ward threw for 255 yards and one touchdown, but he also threw an interception, lost a fumble, and was sacked five times.
His yardage total was strong, but the overall efficiency profile was not enough to keep Tennessee competitive.
Chimere Dike
Dike produced 70 receiving yards and a touchdown on four catches.
He also returned three kickoffs for 84 yards and one punt for 15 yards.
His involvement extended beyond the passing game and made him one of Tennessee’s most active all-around contributors.
Three Numbers That Best Explain the 31-13 Result
If only three statistics were available from this matchup, the most revealing would be:
175 rushing yards for New England
The Patriots controlled the ground game.
39 rushing yards for Tennessee
The Titans could not match New England’s rushing production.
5 sacks by New England
The Patriots repeatedly put pressure on Tennessee’s quarterback.
Together, those numbers describe the basic shape of the game.
New England ran the ball effectively, Tennessee could not establish the same rushing foundation, and the Patriots generated consistent defensive pressure.
Five Key Takeaways From the Player Statistics
1. Maye was highly efficient
A 21-for-23 passing line with two touchdowns and no interceptions is the foundation of a strong quarterback performance.
2. Stevenson gave New England a dependable rushing option
His 88 yards and touchdown were central to the Patriots’ 175-yard rushing total.
3. New England’s rushing advantage was enormous
The Patriots gained 136 more rushing yards than Tennessee.
4. Tennessee’s passing production did not translate into enough scoring
Ward passed for 255 yards, but the Titans finished with only 13 points.
5. New England dominated the second half
The Patriots scored 14 points in the third quarter and held Tennessee scoreless during the entire second half.
How to Interpret These Stats Correctly
There is a temptation to identify the player with the most yards and label that player the best performer.
This game demonstrates why that approach can be misleading.
Ward had more passing yards than Maye.
Tennessee’s individual receiving totals were strong.
Dike had an excellent yards-per-catch figure.
Dike also produced good return numbers.
Yet New England won by 18 points.
The stronger interpretation comes from combining volume, efficiency, turnovers, scoring, rushing production, and defensive pressure.
Maye’s 222 passing yards become more impressive when paired with 21 completions on 23 attempts, two touchdowns, zero interceptions, and 62 rushing yards.
Ward’s 255 passing yards look different when considered alongside 34 attempts, one interception, five sacks, and a lost fumble.
This is the difference between reading statistics and analyzing statistics.
New England Patriots vs Tennessee Titans Match Player Stats: Final Statistical Verdict
The New England Patriots’ 31-13 victory was built on a more complete team performance.
The Patriots did not dominate Tennessee in every statistical category. Tennessee actually produced more individual quarterback passing yards through Cam Ward and recorded strong receiving production.
But New England won the categories that mattered most to the final outcome.
The Patriots rushed for 175 yards compared with Tennessee’s 39. They scored three offensive touchdowns through the listed passing and rushing production, while also recording a defensive touchdown. They avoided an interception, while Tennessee threw one. New England recorded five sacks, and Tennessee gave up five sacks.
Drake Maye’s efficiency was another major difference.
His 21 completions on 23 attempts produced 222 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions. His 135.9 passer rating was significantly higher than Ward’s 92.2.
Maye also contributed 62 rushing yards, making his total offensive influence greater than his passing line alone suggests.
Rhamondre Stevenson provided the foundation on the ground with 88 rushing yards and a touchdown. Stefon Diggs offered reliable volume with seven catches on seven targets. Kayshon Boutte and Mack Hollins supplied explosive receiving plays.
Tennessee had productive individual performances of its own. Ward threw for 255 yards, Dike caught four passes for 70 yards and a touchdown, and Pollard caught six passes for 43 yards while adding 18 rushing yards.
But those individual achievements were not enough to overcome the team’s weaknesses.
The biggest statistical difference was the ground game.
New England averaged 4.9 yards per rushing attempt and finished with 175 rushing yards. Tennessee averaged 3.3 yards per attempt and finished with only 39 yards.
That 136-yard rushing gap helped New England control the game after Tennessee’s fast start.
The final quarter-by-quarter scoring pattern tells the rest of the story. Tennessee led 10-3 after the first quarter. New England responded with 14 points in the second, 14 more in the third, and then held Tennessee scoreless in the fourth.
The game therefore evolved from an early Tennessee advantage into a clear New England victory.
For readers reviewing the New England Patriots vs Tennessee Titans Match Player Stats, the central lesson is simple: the most useful statistics are not always the biggest numbers. Efficiency, rushing balance, turnovers, sacks, and second-half scoring explain this matchup far better than passing yards alone.
The final 31-13 score was the product of New England’s ability to create a balanced offense, pressure the quarterback, protect the football, and shut down Tennessee after halftime.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Patriots and Titans?
The New England Patriots defeated the Tennessee Titans 31-13 on October 19, 2025.
How did Drake Maye perform against the Titans?
Drake Maye completed 21 of 23 passes for 222 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions. He also rushed for 62 yards on eight carries.
How many rushing yards did the Patriots have?
New England recorded 175 rushing yards on 36 attempts, averaging 4.9 yards per carry.
How many rushing yards did Tennessee have?
Tennessee recorded 39 rushing yards on 12 attempts, averaging 3.3 yards per carry.
Who was the Patriots’ leading receiver?
Stefon Diggs led New England with seven receptions for 69 yards on seven targets.
Who led Tennessee in receiving?
Chimere Dike led Tennessee with four receptions for 70 yards and one touchdown.
Conclusion
The October 19, 2025 meeting between New England and Tennessee was a strong example of why complete statistical analysis matters. Tennessee opened the game with a 10-3 lead and produced 255 passing yards through Cam Ward, but New England gradually controlled the matchup.
The Patriots’ 175 rushing yards compared with Tennessee’s 39 created the clearest statistical advantage. Drake Maye added 62 rushing yards to his efficient passing performance, while Rhamondre Stevenson contributed 88 rushing yards and a touchdown.
New England also benefited from stronger turnover results and defensive production. The Patriots recorded five sacks, an interception, and a defensive touchdown. Tennessee recorded one interception thrown and one lost fumble.
The quarter-by-quarter scoring pattern reinforces the same conclusion. Tennessee scored 10 points in the first quarter, but New England responded with 28 unanswered points across the second and third quarters before both teams were held scoreless in the fourth.
Individually, Maye’s 21-for-23 passing performance, Stevenson’s 88 rushing yards, Diggs’ seven receptions, and Boutte’s two explosive catches were among New England’s most important contributions. For Tennessee, Ward’s passing yardage, Dike’s 70 receiving yards and touchdown, and Pollard’s six receptions were notable, but the team’s lack of rushing production and inability to score in the second half proved costly.
Ultimately, the New England Patriots vs Tennessee Titans Match Player Stats show a game won through balance rather than one isolated statistical category. New England combined efficient quarterback play, a powerful rushing advantage, reliable receiving production, defensive pressure, and second-half control to turn an early deficit into a 31-13 road victory.
