New York Giants vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats
The New York Giants vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats from December 29, 2025, tell a much clearer story than the 34 to 10 final score alone. New York controlled the game through a balanced rushing attack, efficient quarterback play, defensive takeaways, and a major special teams contribution from Deonte Banks. Las Vegas, meanwhile, moved the ball through the passing game at times but struggled to turn those opportunities into sustained scoring drives.
The Giants entered the matchup with a 2-13 record and finished the game at 3-13, while the Raiders moved to 2-14 after the loss. The game was played at the Raiders’ home venue, yet New York produced the more complete performance in nearly every area that directly affected the scoreboard.
Jaxson Dart completed 22 of 30 passes for 207 yards without a touchdown or interception. His passing numbers were not spectacular in terms of scoring production, but they were steady enough to complement a Giants rushing attack that produced 155 yards and three touchdowns on 31 attempts.
For Las Vegas, Geno Smith completed 20 of 28 passes for 176 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions. Kenny Pickett also appeared briefly, completing both of his attempts for 16 yards. The Raiders finished with 192 receiving yards but only 63 rushing yards, creating a significant contrast between their passing and ground production.
The biggest individual receiving performance came from Wan’Dale Robinson, who caught 11 passes for 113 yards. On the Raiders’ side, Michael Mayer led all Las Vegas receivers with nine catches for 89 yards.
The numbers also highlight an important part of the game that can be overlooked when simply reading the final score: New York did not need a huge passing day to win comfortably. The Giants created separation by combining a productive ground game with two defensive interceptions and a 95 yard kickoff return touchdown.
Game Overview and Final Score
The Giants defeated the Raiders 34 to 10 on December 29, 2025.
New York scored in every quarter:
- First quarter: 7 points
- Second quarter: 10 points
- Third quarter: 10 points
- Fourth quarter: 7 points
Las Vegas had a much more limited scoring pattern:
- First quarter: 0 points
- Second quarter: 3 points
- Third quarter: 7 points
- Fourth quarter: 0 points
That quarter by quarter distribution shows that the Giants were not dependent on one explosive scoring period. They built their advantage throughout the game and maintained control into the fourth quarter.
The Raiders’ only touchdown came in the third quarter, while their other three points came from a field goal in the second quarter.
New York’s 34 points came from four touchdowns, two field goals, and four extra points. Three of the Giants’ touchdowns came through the rushing game, while Deonte Banks supplied the other touchdown on special teams.
The final score therefore reflects several different sources of production rather than one dominant offensive player.
New York Giants vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats: Quarterback Analysis
Quarterback statistics are often the first numbers readers check, but this matchup is a good example of why quarterback production needs context.
Jaxson Dart’s Passing Performance
Jaxson Dart completed 22 of 30 passes for 207 yards.
His statistical line was:
- Completions: 22
- Attempts: 30
- Completion rate: 73.3 percent
- Passing yards: 207
- Passing touchdowns: 0
- Interceptions: 0
- Sacks: 2
Dart’s 73.3 percent completion rate was a strong element of the Giants’ offensive efficiency. He avoided interceptions and completed enough passes to keep the Raiders from simply loading up against the running game.
His average yards per attempt was approximately 6.9 yards. That is not a downfield explosion, but it was productive enough when paired with New York’s rushing attack.
The absence of a passing touchdown is particularly interesting because the Giants still scored 34 points. This means the team’s offensive success did not depend on Dart throwing touchdown passes.
Instead, his role was more complementary. He protected the football, completed a high percentage of his attempts, and added 48 rushing yards and two rushing touchdowns.
That combination made his overall contribution considerably more important than his passing touchdown total might suggest.
Dart as a Runner
Dart carried the ball nine times for 48 yards and two touchdowns.
That works out to approximately 5.3 yards per carry.
His rushing production was especially valuable because both of his touchdowns came on the ground. A quarterback contributing 48 rushing yards while also avoiding an interception gives the offense another dimension that a conventional passing-only statistical line does not capture.
Dart therefore accounted for 48 rushing yards and two rushing touchdowns in addition to his 207 passing yards.
His performance demonstrates how quarterback rushing can influence defensive structure. When a quarterback is capable of gaining meaningful yardage with his legs, defenders must account for another potential runner on designed plays and broken plays.
Geno Smith’s Passing Performance
Geno Smith completed 20 of 28 passes for 176 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions.
His line:
- Completions: 20
- Attempts: 28
- Completion rate: 71.4 percent
- Passing yards: 176
- Passing touchdowns: 1
- Interceptions: 2
- Sacks: 3
Smith’s completion percentage was also strong, but the two interceptions were costly.
His average yards per attempt was approximately 6.3 yards. That was lower than Dart’s average, and the turnovers created an even bigger difference in effective offensive value.
The Raiders also allowed Smith to be sacked three times.
Turnovers and sacks matter because they can end promising drives without requiring a defense to stop an offense on multiple downs. In this matchup, New York’s two interceptions were particularly important because both were credited to Giants defenders.
Kenny Pickett’s Limited Appearance
Kenny Pickett completed both of his pass attempts for 16 yards.
His line was:
- Completions: 2
- Attempts: 2
- Passing yards: 16
- Passing touchdowns: 0
- Interceptions: 0
- Sacks: 1
Because his sample was so small, it would not be useful to draw broad conclusions from those two completions.
Combined with Smith’s numbers, however, the Raiders finished with 192 passing yards from their quarterbacks.
Giants Rushing Attack Was the Offensive Foundation
The Giants rushed 31 times for 155 yards and three touchdowns.
That produced an average of exactly 5.0 yards per carry.
The main contributors were:
- Tyrone Tracy Jr.: 14 carries, 62 yards
- Jaxson Dart: 9 carries, 48 yards, 2 touchdowns
- Devin Singletary: 8 carries, 45 yards, 1 touchdown
Tracy led the Giants in rushing yardage with 62 yards.
Dart was the most important scoring contributor on the ground, with two rushing touchdowns.
Singletary added 45 rushing yards and another touchdown.
This distribution is important because it shows that New York did not rely on one running back for its ground success. Tracy handled the largest share of the carries, while Dart and Singletary supplied additional production.
The Giants’ 155 rushing yards were 92 more than the Raiders produced on the ground.
That 92 yard difference is substantial and helped shape the overall game.
Tyrone Tracy Jr.
Tracy carried 14 times for 62 yards, averaging approximately 4.4 yards per carry.
He was the Giants’ leading rusher in terms of yardage and handled more carries than any other New York player.
His contribution helped establish a consistent rushing presence without requiring the Giants to give one player an overwhelming workload.
Tracy also caught one pass, although it resulted in a negative five yards.
Devin Singletary
Singletary carried eight times for 45 yards and one touchdown.
His rushing average was approximately 5.6 yards per carry.
He also caught four passes for 25 yards.
The combination of 45 rushing yards and 25 receiving yards gave Singletary 70 yards from scrimmage based on the supplied statistics, along with a rushing touchdown.
Jaxson Dart
Dart’s rushing numbers deserve separate attention because his nine carries produced 48 yards and two touchdowns.
He averaged approximately 5.3 yards per carry.
Those two rushing touchdowns were a major part of the Giants’ scoring output and helped compensate for the absence of a passing touchdown.
Raiders Rushing Performance
Las Vegas rushed 20 times for 63 yards and zero touchdowns.
That equals 3.15 yards per carry.
The leading Raiders rushers were:
- Ashton Jeanty: 16 carries, 60 yards
- Zamir White: 1 carry, 2 yards
- Geno Smith: 1 carry, 1 yard
- Tre Tucker: 2 carries, 0 yards
Ashton Jeanty accounted for 60 of the Raiders’ 63 rushing yards.
That means Jeanty produced approximately 95 percent of Las Vegas’ rushing yardage.
His 16 carries also represented the vast majority of the team’s rushing attempts.
The challenge for the Raiders was that the running game did not produce a touchdown. New York, by contrast, received three rushing touchdowns from Dart and Singletary.
This difference was one of the clearest statistical separators in the matchup.
Receiving Leaders and Passing Distribution
The Giants and Raiders each recorded 22 team receptions according to the supplied statistics.
However, the receiving yardage differed:
- Giants: 207 receiving yards
- Raiders: 192 receiving yards
The Giants also had a major individual performance from Wan’Dale Robinson.
Wan’Dale Robinson Leads the Giants
Wan’Dale Robinson caught 11 passes for 113 yards.
He accounted for more than half of the Giants’ total receptions.
His 113 receiving yards also represented approximately 54.6 percent of New York’s 207 receiving yards.
That makes Robinson the clearest focal point of the Giants’ passing attack.
The combination of 11 receptions and 113 yards indicates that New York consistently found ways to get the ball to him rather than relying exclusively on occasional deep completions.
Other Giants Receivers
The Giants’ receiving distribution included:
- Darius Slayton: 2 receptions, 36 yards
- Devin Singletary: 4 receptions, 25 yards
- Gunner Olszewski: 1 reception, 19 yards
- Daniel Bellinger: 2 receptions, 11 yards
- Isaiah Hodgins: 1 reception, 8 yards
- Tyrone Tracy Jr.: 1 reception, minus 5 yards
The numbers add up to the team’s 22 receptions and 207 receiving yards when Robinson’s production is included.
This distribution shows that Robinson was the central target, while several other players contributed smaller pieces of the passing offense.
Michael Mayer Leads Las Vegas
Michael Mayer was the Raiders’ leading receiver with nine receptions for 89 yards.
He accounted for 46.4 percent of Las Vegas’ 192 receiving yards.
His nine receptions were also the second highest individual reception total in the matchup behind Robinson’s 11.
Other Raiders receiving numbers included:
- Tre Tucker: 5 receptions, 49 yards
- Shedrick Jackson: 2 receptions, 20 yards
- Ashton Jeanty: 2 receptions, 13 yards
- Dont’e Thornton Jr.: 2 receptions, 12 yards
- Tyler Lockett: 2 receptions, 9 yards, 1 touchdown
Lockett provided the Raiders’ only receiving touchdown.
The Raiders therefore had one passing touchdown despite having 192 receiving yards. That contrast again points toward New York’s ability to prevent yardage from consistently turning into points.
Defensive Player Stats and Turnovers
The defensive statistics provide one of the strongest explanations for the 34 to 10 result.
The Giants recorded two interceptions.
Bobby Okereke intercepted one pass and returned it 47 yards.
Dane Belton recorded the other interception and returned it eight yards.
The Raiders recorded no interceptions.
There were also no fumbles by either team according to the supplied game data.
That means the Giants won the interception battle 2 to 0 and the overall turnover battle 2 to 0.
Turnovers can dramatically change the shape of an NFL game because they simultaneously stop an opponent’s possession and create an opportunity for the other offense.
Giants Defensive Totals
New York recorded:
- 64 total tackles
- 36 solo tackles
- 4 sacks
- 9 tackles for loss
- 5 passes defended
- 9 quarterback hits
- 2 interceptions
The four sacks were especially notable compared with Las Vegas’ two sacks.
The Giants also generated nine tackles for loss.
That suggests New York’s defense was able to create negative plays both through pressure on the quarterback and disruption in the backfield.
Raiders Defensive Totals
Las Vegas recorded:
- 67 total tackles
- 41 solo tackles
- 2 sacks
- 4 tackles for loss
- 4 passes defended
- 7 quarterback hits
- 0 interceptions
The Raiders actually finished with more total tackles and solo tackles.
That statistic should not be confused with defensive dominance.
A team can accumulate many tackles because the opponent is successfully completing plays and reaching the second level. Tackles become more meaningful when considered alongside turnovers, sacks, tackles for loss, and points allowed.
In this game, the Giants’ defense created more interceptions, more sacks, and more tackles for loss while allowing only 10 points.
Special Teams Changed the Game
One of the most important elements in the New York Giants vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats is special teams.
Deonte Banks returned two kickoffs for 113 yards.
His average was 56.5 yards per return, and his longest return was 95 yards.
That 95 yard return went for a touchdown.
A special teams touchdown is particularly valuable because it produces points without requiring the offense to drive the length of the field.
It also changes the opponent’s field position and can affect momentum.
Giants Kicking
Ben Sauls converted:
- 2 of 2 field goals
- 4 of 4 extra points
- 10 total points
His longest field goal was 32 yards.
The four successful extra points correspond with the Giants’ four touchdowns.
Raiders Kicking
Daniel Carlson converted:
- 1 of 1 field goals
- 1 of 1 extra points
- 4 total points
His field goal was 42 yards.
The Raiders’ kicking game was therefore perfect on the opportunities recorded, but Las Vegas did not generate enough scoring opportunities to keep pace.
Punt and Return Statistics
New York’s Jamie Gillan punted twice for 88 yards.
His average was 44.0 yards, with one punt inside the 20 yard line and a long of 44 yards.
Las Vegas punter AJ Cole recorded three punts for 171 yards.
Cole averaged 57.0 yards per punt, with one inside the 20 and a long of 63 yards.
The Raiders therefore had the stronger raw punting average.
However, punting statistics need to be read within game context. A strong punt average does not automatically translate into a strong overall special teams performance, particularly when the opposing team has a 95 yard kickoff return touchdown.
Punt Returns
Gunner Olszewski returned two punts for 18 yards for New York, averaging 9.0 yards per return.
Alex Bachman returned two punts for one yard for Las Vegas, averaging 0.5 yards per return.
This was another area where New York generated more useful field position.
Total Offensive Production
Combining the supplied passing and rushing figures provides a useful overview of each offense.
Giants
Passing:
207 yards
Rushing:
155 yards
Total passing plus rushing yardage:
362 yards
Raiders
Passing:
192 yards
Rushing:
63 yards
Total passing plus rushing yardage:
255 yards
The Giants therefore produced 107 more yards from passing and rushing combined.
That is a significant advantage.
New York’s 362 total yards came from a balanced offensive structure. The team produced 207 passing yards and 155 rushing yards.
Las Vegas was much more dependent on passing production. The Raiders generated 192 passing yards but only 63 rushing yards.
The difference in rushing output was 92 yards, which accounts for most of the 107 yard gap in total offensive yardage.
Why the Giants Won
The final score can be understood through five major statistical factors.
1. New York Won the Rushing Battle
The Giants produced 155 rushing yards compared with 63 for Las Vegas.
That is a 92 yard advantage.
New York also scored three rushing touchdowns, while Las Vegas scored none on the ground.
2. The Giants Avoided Turnovers
Dart threw zero interceptions.
The Giants also had no recorded fumbles.
Meanwhile, Smith threw two interceptions.
That created a 2 to 0 turnover advantage for New York.
3. New York Created More Defensive Disruption
The Giants recorded four sacks compared with two for Las Vegas.
They also recorded nine tackles for loss compared with four by the Raiders.
New York added nine quarterback hits, while Las Vegas recorded seven.
4. Wan’Dale Robinson Produced at a High Level
Robinson’s 11 receptions for 113 yards gave the Giants a reliable receiving outlet.
His production accounted for more than half of New York’s receiving yardage.
5. Deonte Banks Delivered a Game-Changing Return
Banks’ 95 yard kickoff return touchdown supplied seven points without requiring an offensive drive.
That was a major advantage in a game where New York ultimately won by 24 points.
Comparing the Most Important Players
A simple player-by-player comparison helps identify where the matchup was won.
Quarterback
Jaxson Dart:
22 of 30, 207 yards, 0 touchdowns, 0 interceptions, 2 sacks
Geno Smith:
20 of 28, 176 yards, 1 touchdown, 2 interceptions, 3 sacks
Kenny Pickett:
2 of 2, 16 yards, 0 touchdowns, 0 interceptions, 1 sack
Dart had the cleaner passing performance because he avoided turnovers, while his rushing production added two touchdowns.
Leading Rusher
Tyrone Tracy Jr.:
14 carries, 62 yards
Ashton Jeanty:
16 carries, 60 yards
Jeanty had two more carries, but Tracy finished with two more rushing yards.
The larger difference was the overall team rushing performance, with New York producing 155 yards compared with Las Vegas’ 63.
Leading Receiver
Wan’Dale Robinson:
11 receptions, 113 yards
Michael Mayer:
9 receptions, 89 yards
Robinson led Mayer by 24 receiving yards and two receptions.
Both players were heavily involved in their respective passing attacks.
Defensive Takeaways
Bobby Okereke:
1 interception, 47 return yards
Dane Belton:
1 interception, 8 return yards
Raiders:
0 interceptions
The Giants’ defense clearly won this category.
What the Statistics Say About Offensive Efficiency
The most interesting lesson from this matchup is that passing touchdowns are not the only measure of quarterback or offensive success.
Dart threw zero touchdown passes, yet the Giants scored 34 points.
The offense achieved that through several complementary methods.
The Giants rushed for three touchdowns. Dart personally accounted for two of those. Singletary added another.
The special teams unit produced another touchdown through Banks.
Sauls converted both field goal attempts.
This means New York received points from offense, defense-related turnover opportunities, and special teams.
Las Vegas, on the other hand, had one passing touchdown and one field goal.
That made the Raiders much more dependent on successful offensive drives for scoring.
The Importance of Field Position
The supplied statistics do not include a complete drive chart or official field position breakdown, so exact field position advantages should not be invented.
Still, the return statistics provide useful evidence.
Banks averaged 56.5 yards on his two kickoff returns.
His longest return was 95 yards and resulted in a touchdown.
Olszewski averaged 9.0 yards on two punt returns.
The Raiders’ punt return average was only 0.5 yards.
Those numbers suggest that New York’s return game provided more explosive value.
At the same time, Las Vegas’ AJ Cole averaged an impressive 57.0 yards per punt.
That shows why special teams analysis should not be reduced to one statistic. The Raiders had a strong punting number, while the Giants produced the game’s most significant return play.
A Closer Look at the Scoring Pattern
New York scored seven points in the first quarter, 10 in the second, 10 in the third, and seven in the fourth.
That consistency is important.
There was no quarter in which the Giants failed to score.
Las Vegas, by contrast, was held scoreless in the first and fourth quarters.
The Raiders scored only three points in the second quarter before adding seven in the third.
The fourth quarter was particularly revealing. New York added another seven points while Las Vegas failed to score.
That indicates that the Giants continued to generate enough offensive or special teams production to extend the margin late rather than simply holding on to an early lead.
Player Stats That Matter Most for Fantasy and Performance Analysis
For fantasy football and player-performance analysis, several numbers stand out.
Wan’Dale Robinson’s 11 receptions and 113 yards were the strongest receiving statistics on either team.
Ashton Jeanty’s 16 carries and 60 yards made him the clear rushing focal point for Las Vegas, although the Raiders did not get a rushing touchdown.
Jaxson Dart’s two rushing touchdowns make his fantasy profile much more interesting than his passing line suggests.
Devin Singletary combined 45 rushing yards, one rushing touchdown, and 25 receiving yards.
Michael Mayer’s nine receptions for 89 yards made him one of the most heavily involved pass catchers in the game.
Deonte Banks’ 95 yard kickoff return touchdown was a major real-world contribution, although return touchdowns are a different category from normal offensive fantasy production.
Most Significant Statistical Takeaways
Several numbers summarize the game better than the final score alone.
34 to 10: The final scoring margin favored New York by 24 points.
362 to 255: The Giants held a 107 yard advantage in combined passing and rushing production.
155 to 63: New York dominated rushing yardage.
3 to 0: The Giants scored three rushing touchdowns while Las Vegas scored none on the ground.
2 to 0: New York won the interception battle.
4 to 2: The Giants recorded twice as many sacks.
9 to 4: New York also recorded more than twice as many tackles for loss.
11 for 113: Robinson was the Giants’ leading receiver.
9 for 89: Mayer led the Raiders in receiving.
95 yards: Banks’ longest kickoff return went for a touchdown.
These figures provide a concise explanation for how a team with no passing touchdowns could still win by 24 points.
What the Game Reveals About Team Construction
The statistical profile also offers a broader football lesson.
New York did not need one dominant category. Instead, the Giants won several important areas at once.
The rushing attack was efficient.
The quarterback protected the football.
The defense created turnovers.
The pass rush generated four sacks.
The return game produced a touchdown.
The kicking unit converted every attempt.
That is what a complementary team performance looks like statistically.
Las Vegas had some positive individual numbers. Smith completed 71.4 percent of his passes. Mayer caught nine passes. Jeanty gained 60 rushing yards. Cole averaged 57.0 yards per punt.
But the Raiders did not convert those individual contributions into enough points.
This distinction is essential when interpreting player statistics. A player can post respectable yardage numbers while his team still struggles because production must eventually translate into successful drives and points.
Important Statistical Limitations
A responsible statistical analysis should also identify what the supplied data does not show.
The information provided does not include:
- First-down totals
- Third-down conversion rates
- Fourth-down attempts
- Time of possession
- Red-zone efficiency
- Penalties and penalty yardage
- Individual defensive tackle leaders
- Individual pressure totals beyond team quarterback hits and sacks
- Drive-by-drive results
- Snap counts
- Target totals for every receiver
- Longest pass completion
- Longest rushing attempt
Because these figures were not supplied, they should not be guessed.
This matters when comparing teams because statistics such as third-down efficiency and time of possession can provide additional context about why one offense sustained drives more effectively.
The available data is still sufficient to explain the central story of the game: New York was more productive on the ground, protected the football, created turnovers, generated more defensive disruption, and received a decisive special teams touchdown.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score of the Giants vs Raiders game?
The New York Giants defeated the Las Vegas Raiders 34 to 10 on December 29, 2025.
Who was the Giants’ leading passer?
Jaxson Dart was the Giants’ leading passer. He completed 22 of 30 attempts for 207 yards, with no touchdowns and no interceptions.
Who led the Giants in rushing?
Tyrone Tracy Jr. led the Giants with 62 rushing yards on 14 carries. Jaxson Dart had 48 rushing yards and two rushing touchdowns.
Who was the leading receiver in the game?
Wan’Dale Robinson led the game with 11 receptions for 113 yards. Michael Mayer led the Raiders with nine receptions for 89 yards.
How many interceptions did the Giants record?
The Giants recorded two interceptions. Bobby Okereke had one with 47 return yards, while Dane Belton had one with eight return yards.
Who scored the Giants’ special teams touchdown?
Deonte Banks scored on a 95 yard kickoff return. He finished with two kickoff returns for 113 yards.
Conclusion
The New York Giants vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats show that New York’s 34 to 10 victory was built on balance rather than a single overwhelming offensive performance.
Jaxson Dart delivered an efficient passing performance while adding 48 rushing yards and two rushing touchdowns. The Giants’ ground game produced 155 yards and three touchdowns overall, giving New York a major advantage over a Raiders rushing attack that managed only 63 yards.
Wan’Dale Robinson was the Giants’ leading receiver with 113 yards on 11 catches, while Michael Mayer led Las Vegas with 89 yards on nine receptions.
Defensively, New York created the more important plays. Bobby Okereke and Dane Belton each intercepted Geno Smith, giving the Giants a 2 to 0 interception advantage. New York also recorded four sacks and nine tackles for loss.
Special teams provided another decisive moment when Deonte Banks returned a kickoff 95 yards for a touchdown.
The complete statistical picture is therefore much more informative than simply comparing quarterback passing yards. New York won through rushing efficiency, ball security, defensive disruption, takeaways, receiving production, and special teams explosiveness.
For readers studying this matchup, the central takeaway is straightforward: the Giants consistently won the areas that turn yardage into points, while the Raiders generated some respectable individual statistics without producing enough scoring opportunities to stay competitive.
2 Comments