Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats

The Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats from November 24, 2025, tell a much deeper story than the 34-7 final score alone. Los Angeles controlled the game through efficient quarterback play, explosive passing production, and two interception returns, while Tampa Bay struggled to sustain offense despite running the ball reasonably well. Matthew Stafford completed 25 of 35 passes for 263 yards and three touchdowns without throwing an interception, while Tampa Bay used both Baker Mayfield and Teddy Bridgewater and combined for only 103 passing yards. The Rams ultimately won 34-7, improving to 9-2, while the Buccaneers fell to 6-5.

This statistical breakdown focuses on what the numbers actually show. Rather than treating every box-score figure as equally important, the goal is to identify which performances shaped the result, where the game changed, and what the individual statistics reveal about each team’s approach.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The final score was:

Los Angeles Rams 34, Tampa Bay Buccaneers 7

The records entering and following the matchup provide useful context. Tampa Bay stood at 6-5 overall and 4-3 on the road, while Los Angeles entered with a 9-2 record and a strong 5-1 home mark.

The overall statistical profile was heavily tilted toward Los Angeles in the passing game.

Category	Tampa Bay Buccaneers	Los Angeles Rams
Final Score	7	34
Passing	103 yards combined	263 yards
Rushing	123 yards	70 yards
Receptions	17	25
Receiving Yards	103	273
Receiving TDs	1	3
Interceptions	0 thrown	2 defensive interceptions
Fumbles	1, not lost	None
Punts	4	3

One of the most interesting aspects of the box score is that Tampa Bay actually produced more rushing yardage than Los Angeles, 123 yards to 70. That statistic did not translate into offensive success because the Buccaneers could not pair their ground production with an effective passing attack.

Los Angeles, by contrast, created a major advantage through the air.

The Rams recorded 273 receiving yards, compared with just 103 for Tampa Bay. That 170-yard difference in receiving production is one of the clearest explanations for the final margin.

How Matthew Stafford Controlled the Passing Game

Matthew Stafford was the most important offensive player in the matchup.

He completed 25 of 35 passes for 263 yards and three touchdowns, with zero interceptions.

That translates to a completion rate of approximately 71.4 percent.

Stafford’s efficiency stands out because he combined volume with accuracy. He attempted 35 passes, completed 25, and avoided the turnovers that often erase otherwise productive drives.

His three touchdown passes were also critical. Los Angeles scored 34 points, and Stafford was directly responsible for three passing touchdowns.

The performance can be summarized as follows:

• 25 completions
• 35 attempts
• 263 passing yards
• 3 passing touchdowns
• 0 interceptions
• Approximately 71.4 percent completion rate

There is an important analytical lesson here. Passing yardage by itself does not explain a game. Stafford’s 263 yards were valuable because they came with three touchdowns and no interceptions. He consistently converted his passing opportunities into scoring production.

Tampa Bay’s quarterbacks had a very different statistical profile.

Baker Mayfield’s Difficult Outing

Baker Mayfield started the game for Tampa Bay but struggled to create consistent production.

His line was:

9 completions on 19 attempts, 41 yards, 1 touchdown, and 2 interceptions.

His completion rate was approximately 47.4 percent.

The 41 passing yards are especially striking. On 19 attempts, Mayfield averaged only about 2.2 yards per attempt.

The two interceptions were even more damaging because they gave Los Angeles opportunities to turn defensive plays into points.

Mayfield’s statistical performance therefore had problems in three areas:

1. Completion efficiency was low.
2. Passing yardage was extremely limited.
3. Turnovers directly helped the Rams gain momentum.

The one touchdown prevented the performance from becoming a complete statistical blank, but it was not enough to offset the interceptions and lack of passing yardage.

Teddy Bridgewater’s Numbers

Tampa Bay also used Teddy Bridgewater.

Bridgewater completed 8 of 15 passes for 62 yards, with no touchdowns and no interceptions.

His completion percentage was approximately 53.3 percent, while his average yards per attempt was about 4.1.

Bridgewater was more secure with the football than Mayfield, but he did not generate the explosive passing production Tampa Bay needed.

Combining both quarterbacks gives Tampa Bay:

17 completions on 34 attempts for 103 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions.

That means the Buccaneers completed exactly half of their combined pass attempts.

The combined quarterback numbers are particularly important because they show that the passing struggles were not limited to one isolated mistake. Tampa Bay’s offense collectively failed to generate enough through the air.

Quarterback Comparison

Statistic	Baker Mayfield	Teddy Bridgewater	Matthew Stafford
Completions	9	8	25
Attempts	19	15	35
Passing Yards	41	62	263
TD Passes	1	0	3
Interceptions	2	0	0
Completion Rate	47.4%	53.3%	71.4%

Stafford had a clear statistical advantage across the major passing categories.

He produced more than twice Tampa Bay’s combined passing yardage, while also throwing three times as many touchdowns as the Buccaneers’ quarterbacks combined.

Most importantly, Stafford did it without an interception.

Tampa Bay’s Rushing Game Was Better Than the Final Score Suggests

The Buccaneers rushed 29 times for 123 yards, averaging 4.2 yards per carry.

That is a respectable rushing output.

The 123 yards indicate that Tampa Bay was capable of moving the ball on the ground. The problem was that the rushing attack could not compensate for the passing deficiency.

This distinction matters when interpreting the box score.

A team can run effectively and still lose badly if its passing game produces very little. That is essentially what happened here.

Tampa Bay’s rushing numbers show that the offensive failure was not simply a case of being unable to move the football in every phase.

The Buccaneers averaged 4.2 yards per rushing attempt and finished with 123 yards, but their overall offensive balance was poor because the passing game produced only 103 yards.

The contrast between 123 rushing yards and 103 passing yards is particularly unusual. Tampa Bay actually gained more yardage through the ground than through the air.

Los Angeles Rushing Production

The Rams rushed 19 times for 70 yards, averaging 3.7 yards per carry.

Those numbers were lower than Tampa Bay’s rushing totals.

Los Angeles did not need a dominant ground game to win because its passing attack created the larger advantage.

The Rams’ 70 rushing yards were supplemented by 263 passing yards and 273 receiving yards. That offensive profile shows how effectively Los Angeles used its passing game to create separation.

A common mistake in football analysis is to assume that the team with the better rushing statistics necessarily controlled the game.

This matchup is a strong example of why that assumption can be misleading.

Tampa Bay had the better rushing output, but Los Angeles had the far more productive passing attack and ultimately won by 27 points.

Receiving Production Was the Biggest Statistical Difference

The receiving statistics provide perhaps the clearest picture of the matchup.

Tampa Bay recorded:

17 receptions for 103 yards and one touchdown.

Los Angeles recorded:

25 receptions for 273 yards and three touchdowns.

The Rams therefore produced:

• 8 more receptions
• 170 more receiving yards
• 2 more receiving touchdowns

That is an enormous difference.

Los Angeles averaged approximately 10.9 yards per reception, while Tampa Bay averaged approximately 6.1 yards per reception.

The difference in yards per catch indicates that the Rams were not merely completing more short passes. Their passing game was generating substantially more yardage per completed reception.

Puka Nacua Leads the Rams Receivers

Puka Nacua was the top listed receiver for Los Angeles.

He finished with:

7 receptions for 97 yards.

That means Nacua accounted for a significant portion of the Rams’ receiving production.

His 97 yards represented approximately 35.5 percent of Los Angeles’ 273 receiving yards.

Nacua also averaged nearly 13.9 yards per reception.

That combination of volume and efficiency made him one of the central pieces of the Rams’ passing success.

Seven receptions is enough involvement to show that he was not simply benefiting from one isolated explosive play. He was consistently involved in the passing attack.

Emeka Egbuka Led Tampa Bay’s Listed Receivers

For Tampa Bay, Emeka Egbuka was the top listed receiver in the supplied statistics.

He finished with:

3 receptions for 32 yards.

That works out to approximately 10.7 yards per reception.

Egbuka’s per-catch production was reasonably efficient, but Tampa Bay’s overall passing volume was too low to produce the same impact as Los Angeles.

The contrast with Nacua is significant.

Nacua had seven receptions for 97 yards, while Egbuka had three for 32. The difference was 4 receptions and 65 yards between the two leading listed receivers.

Tampa Bay’s Offensive Challenge

The Buccaneers’ statistical challenge can be reduced to a simple equation:

Decent rushing production + ineffective passing production + two interceptions = limited offensive output.

The 123 rushing yards gave Tampa Bay a foundation.

But 103 total receiving yards meant that the passing game never developed enough to keep pace with the Rams.

The two interceptions thrown by Mayfield made the problem worse.

Even though Tampa Bay did not lose a fumble, the offense still gave Los Angeles valuable turnover opportunities through the passing game.

The Rams Defense Changed the Game With Interceptions

Los Angeles recorded two interceptions, producing 81 return yards and one defensive touchdown.

This is one of the most important defensive statistics in the matchup.

An interception is already valuable because it ends an offensive possession and gives the defense’s team the ball. An interception return adds another layer of value because the return can immediately change field position.

Here, the Rams turned two interceptions into 81 return yards, including one touchdown.

That means the Los Angeles defense was not simply preventing Tampa Bay from scoring. It was actively creating scoring opportunities.

The defensive touchdown is especially important when analyzing a 34-7 result.

Not every point came from traditional offensive drives. The Rams defense directly contributed to the scoreboard.

Turnover Differential and Game Control

The supplied statistics show:

• Tampa Bay threw 2 interceptions.
• Los Angeles threw 0 interceptions.
• Tampa Bay lost 0 fumbles.
• Los Angeles had no fumbles listed.

That gives Los Angeles a clear turnover advantage.

The two Tampa Bay interceptions were particularly damaging because Stafford protected the football throughout the game.

This creates one of the strongest contrasts in the matchup:

Stafford: 3 TD, 0 INT

Mayfield: 1 TD, 2 INT

That difference is not just a quarterback statistic. It reflects possession control.

When one team protects the ball while the opponent throws multiple interceptions, the margin for error becomes much smaller for the turnover-prone team.

Special Teams Statistics

Special teams also played a supporting role in the game.

Tampa Bay Kicking

Chase McLaughlin finished:

1-for-1 on extra points, with one point.

Tampa Bay did not generate enough scoring opportunities to create a large field-goal workload.

Los Angeles Kicking

Harrison Mevis went:

• 2-for-2 on field goals
• Long field goal: 52 yards
• 4-for-4 on extra points
• 10 total points

The 52-yard field goal demonstrates that Los Angeles converted from significant distance.

His four successful extra points also show how frequently the Rams reached the end zone.

Punting Comparison

Tampa Bay’s Riley Dixon recorded:

4 punts for 169 yards, averaging 42.3 yards, with a long of 55 yards.

Los Angeles’ Ethan Evans recorded:

3 punts for 105 yards, averaging 35.0 yards, with a long of 51 yards.

The number of punts itself is revealing.

Tampa Bay punted four times compared with three punts by Los Angeles, suggesting that both teams had possessions that ended without points, but Tampa Bay had greater difficulty converting possessions into sustained scoring opportunities.

Return Game Statistics

Tampa Bay recorded:

2 kick returns for 48 yards, averaging 24.0 yards per return.

Kameron Johnson also had:

1 punt return for 15 yards.

For Los Angeles, Kyren Williams recorded:

1 punt return for 8 yards.

These numbers did not define the matchup, but they provide useful context for field-position analysis.

Tampa Bay’s 24.0-yard kick-return average gave the offense reasonable starting-field-position potential. However, field position can only become meaningful if the offense converts it into first downs and points.

That is where Tampa Bay struggled.

Why the 34-7 Score Makes Sense Statistically

At first glance, the score may look surprising because Tampa Bay rushed for 123 yards compared with only 70 rushing yards for Los Angeles.

But the broader numbers explain the result.

Los Angeles had:

• 263 passing yards
• 273 receiving yards
• 3 passing touchdowns
• 0 interceptions thrown
• 2 defensive interceptions
• 81 interception-return yards
• 1 defensive touchdown

Tampa Bay had:

• 103 combined passing yards
• 123 rushing yards
• 103 receiving yards
• 1 passing touchdown
• 2 interceptions thrown
• 0 fumbles lost

The Rams’ ability to generate points through both offense and defense was the decisive factor.

A Closer Look at Offensive Efficiency

Raw yardage tells only part of the story.

Tampa Bay gained 123 rushing yards and 103 passing yards. That produces 226 yards from those two major offensive categories.

Los Angeles recorded 70 rushing yards and 263 passing yards, producing 333 yards from the same categories.

That is a 107-yard advantage for Los Angeles across rushing and passing yardage.

The difference becomes even more meaningful when turnovers and touchdowns are considered.

Tampa Bay’s 226 yards did not produce enough scoring because the passing attack was inefficient and turnovers interrupted possessions.

Los Angeles converted its 333 yards into a 34-point performance while protecting the football.

Passing Efficiency Was the Defining Factor

The matchup provides a clear example of how passing efficiency can outweigh rushing volume.

Tampa Bay:

34 attempts, 17 completions, 103 yards

Los Angeles:

35 attempts, 25 completions, 263 yards

The teams attempted almost exactly the same number of passes.

That makes the difference even more significant.

The Rams did not win because they threw dramatically more often. They won because their passes were completed more frequently and generated much more yardage.

Tampa Bay completed 50 percent of its passes.

Los Angeles completed approximately 71.4 percent.

That is a gap of more than 21 percentage points.

The Importance of Explosive Passing Production

Tampa Bay’s receiving unit averaged about 6.1 yards per reception.

Los Angeles averaged approximately 10.9 yards per reception.

This nearly five-yard difference per reception adds up quickly over 25 completions.

The Rams were therefore getting more value from each successful passing play.

This is an important point for readers examining football statistics. A team does not necessarily need more completions to produce a strong passing attack. It needs efficient completions that move the chains, create scoring opportunities, and maintain possession.

Los Angeles achieved that much more effectively.

Player-Level Takeaways

Matthew Stafford

Stafford was the clearest offensive standout.

His 25-for-35 performance combined accuracy, volume, yardage, and touchdowns while avoiding turnovers.

Puka Nacua

Nacua led the listed Rams receivers with 97 yards on seven receptions.

His combination of reception volume and yardage made him a major component of Los Angeles’ aerial production.

Baker Mayfield

Mayfield’s two interceptions and 41 passing yards were major obstacles for Tampa Bay.

The one touchdown pass provided some positive production, but it did not offset the turnovers.

Teddy Bridgewater

Bridgewater was more secure with zero interceptions and produced 62 yards on 15 attempts.

However, the passing attack still remained limited in terms of total yardage and scoring.

Emeka Egbuka

Egbuka led Tampa Bay’s listed receivers with 32 yards on three receptions.

His numbers were respectable on a per-reception basis, but Tampa Bay needed considerably more total receiving production.

Harrison Mevis

Mevis scored 10 points through four extra points and two field goals, including a 52-yard field goal.

His kicking performance added important support to Los Angeles’ offensive output.

What the Statistics Say About Tampa Bay

The Buccaneers’ numbers suggest that their biggest problem was not simply rushing production.

The team ran effectively enough to produce 123 yards at 4.2 yards per carry.

Instead, the biggest issue was passing efficiency.

The Buccaneers completed half of their pass attempts and generated only 103 combined passing yards. Two interceptions further damaged their ability to sustain drives.

This created a difficult situation for the offense.

When a team cannot consistently threaten through the air, the opposing defense can focus more attention on limiting the run and controlling the rhythm of the game.

Tampa Bay’s final seven points reflect that offensive limitation.

What the Statistics Say About Los Angeles

Los Angeles displayed a much more balanced path to winning despite producing fewer rushing yards.

The Rams did not need to dominate on the ground because Stafford’s passing attack generated 263 yards and three touchdowns.

The defense then added another layer by producing two interceptions, 81 return yards, and a defensive touchdown.

The Rams therefore won through complementary football:

Efficient passing + turnover creation + reliable kicking = 34 points.

That combination explains why the team could win comfortably despite averaging only 3.7 yards per rushing attempt.

Most Important Numbers From the Matchup

For readers who want the essential statistics quickly, these figures deserve the most attention:

1. Final score: Rams 34, Buccaneers 7
2. Stafford: 25/35, 263 yards, 3 TD, 0 INT
3. Mayfield: 9/19, 41 yards, 1 TD, 2 INT
4. Bridgewater: 8/15, 62 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT
5. Tampa Bay rushing: 123 yards
6. Los Angeles rushing: 70 yards
7. Tampa Bay receiving: 103 yards
8. Los Angeles receiving: 273 yards
9. Puka Nacua: 7 receptions, 97 yards
10. Emeka Egbuka: 3 receptions, 32 yards
11. Los Angeles interceptions: 2
12. Interception return yardage: 81 yards
13. Rams defensive touchdowns: 1
14. Harrison Mevis: 2/2 field goals, 4/4 extra points
15. Longest field goal: 52 yards

Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats: What Matters Most

The most useful way to interpret the Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats is to look beyond the final score and identify the statistical chain that produced it.

The first link was quarterback efficiency.

Stafford completed 25 of 35 passes for 263 yards and three touchdowns without an interception. Tampa Bay’s quarterbacks combined for 17 completions on 34 attempts, 103 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions.

The second link was receiving production.

Los Angeles produced 273 receiving yards, while Tampa Bay recorded 103.

The third link was defensive scoring.

The Rams intercepted Tampa Bay twice and returned those interceptions for 81 yards, including one touchdown.

The fourth link was scoring efficiency.

Los Angeles converted its opportunities into 34 points, while Tampa Bay managed only seven.

These numbers work together. Looking at only one category can create an incomplete picture.

Why Rushing Yards Alone Can Be Misleading

One of the clearest lessons from this game is that rushing yardage should not be treated as a standalone measure of offensive dominance.

Tampa Bay rushed for 53 more yards than Los Angeles.

Yet the Buccaneers lost by 27 points.

That happened because football games are decided by the combined impact of possessions, passing efficiency, turnovers, touchdowns, field position, and scoring opportunities.

The Rams were more effective where it mattered most.

Their passing attack generated 160 more passing yards than Tampa Bay’s quarterbacks combined.

That advantage overwhelmed Tampa Bay’s 53-yard rushing edge.

A Practical Framework for Reading This Box Score

When analyzing a game like this, readers can use five questions.

1. Who won the quarterback battle?

In this matchup, Stafford clearly had the stronger statistical performance.

2. Which team created more passing production?

Los Angeles, by a wide margin.

3. Which team protected the football?

Los Angeles threw no interceptions, while Tampa Bay threw two.

4. Did the defense create points?

Yes. The Rams recorded a defensive interception touchdown.

5. Did rushing success translate into scoring?

For Tampa Bay, it did not.

This framework provides a more meaningful analysis than simply comparing total yards.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the Buccaneers and Rams?

The Los Angeles Rams defeated the Tampa Bay Buccaneers 34-7 on November 24, 2025.

How many passing yards did Matthew Stafford have?

Matthew Stafford completed 25 of 35 passes for 263 yards and three touchdowns, with no interceptions.

How did Baker Mayfield perform against the Rams?

Baker Mayfield completed 9 of 19 passes for 41 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions.

Who was the Rams’ leading listed receiver?

Puka Nacua led the listed Rams receivers with seven receptions for 97 yards.

How many rushing yards did Tampa Bay have?

The Buccaneers recorded 123 rushing yards on 29 carries, averaging 4.2 yards per carry.

How many interceptions did the Rams record?

Los Angeles recorded two interceptions, totaling 81 return yards and one defensive touchdown.

Conclusion

The Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats show that the 34-7 result was driven primarily by passing efficiency, turnover creation, and Los Angeles’ ability to turn offensive and defensive opportunities into points.

Matthew Stafford delivered the strongest individual performance with 263 passing yards and three touchdowns while avoiding interceptions. Puka Nacua provided 97 receiving yards, while the Rams defense added two interceptions, 81 return yards, and a defensive touchdown.

Tampa Bay’s 123 rushing yards were a positive statistical element, but the Buccaneers could not turn that production into enough points. The combined quarterback line of 103 passing yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions illustrates the larger offensive problem.

Ultimately, the numbers show why the Rams were able to win despite rushing for fewer yards. Los Angeles was substantially more efficient through the air, protected the football, created turnovers, and converted its opportunities into points. Tampa Bay’s rushing success was real, but it was not enough to overcome the passing and turnover gap.

For anyone studying this matchup, the most revealing statistics are not simply the 34-7 score or the rushing totals. The clearest indicators are Stafford’s 25-for-35 passing performance, the Rams’ 273 receiving yards, Tampa Bay’s 103 passing yards, and Los Angeles’ two interceptions with one defensive touchdown. Together, those figures explain the game far more completely than any single box-score category.