New York Yankees vs Seattle Mariners Match Player Stats

The new york yankees vs seattle mariners match player stats from August 13, 2026, tell the story of a game that changed dramatically after a 5-5 tie. The Seattle Mariners entered Yankee Stadium looking to build on their offense, but the New York Yankees produced a decisive late surge to win 10-5. Seattle collected nine hits and hit three home runs, yet New York answered with 13 hits, two homers, and five runs across the seventh and eighth innings. The result was not simply a high-scoring win. It was a game shaped by timely hitting, pressure situations, bullpen performance, and a major late offensive swing.

At Yankee Stadium in the Bronx, the Yankees turned a competitive afternoon into a five-run victory. The attendance was 41,714, and the game lasted 2 hours and 59 minutes. Seattle finished with five runs, nine hits, no errors, and seven walks, while New York recorded 10 runs, 13 hits, one error, and three walks.

The individual numbers make the result even more interesting. Trent Grisham was the standout performer for New York, going 3-for-5 with three runs, four RBIs, and two home runs. Spencer Jones also made a major contribution with two hits, two doubles, and three RBIs. Ben Rice added two hits, three runs, one RBI, one walk, and two stolen bases.

For Seattle, Randy Arozarena finished 1-for-4 with two runs, two RBIs, one home run, and one walk. Dominic Canzone recorded two hits, one run, one RBI, and one home run. Julio Rodríguez also homered and drove in a run.

The final score, however, does not fully explain how the game unfolded. The Mariners and Yankees were tied 5-5 through five innings before New York scored three times in the seventh and twice in the eighth. That late burst became the central statistical story of the contest.

New York Yankees vs Seattle Mariners Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The basic scoreboard provides the first layer of the matchup.

Category	Seattle Mariners	New York Yankees
Final Score	5	10
Runs	5	10
Hits	9	13
Errors	0	1
Home Runs	3	2
Walks	7	3
Strikeouts	8	8
RISP	1-for-8	3-for-9
Left on Base	9	5

The Yankees won despite Seattle hitting one more home run. That detail is important because it demonstrates why home run totals alone cannot explain the outcome.

Seattle’s three home runs produced five runs, but the Mariners struggled to convert opportunities with runners in scoring position. They went just 1-for-8 with runners in scoring position. New York, meanwhile, went 3-for-9.

That difference helped explain the final result.

The Yankees also left only five runners on base compared with nine for Seattle. In a close game, that kind of efficiency can be decisive. New York generated fewer walks but did more with the opportunities it created.

How the Yankees Turned a 5-5 Game Into a 10-5 Win

The most important part of the game was the late scoring sequence.

After five innings, the score was tied 5-5. At that stage, neither side had established clear control. Seattle had already demonstrated its power, while New York had accumulated eight hits against Seattle pitching by the end of its eight-inning offensive output.

Then the Yankees broke the tie.

New York scored three runs in the seventh inning, moving ahead 8-5. They added two more runs in the eighth, pushing the advantage to 10-5.

That five-run stretch from the seventh through eighth innings was the turning point.

From an analytical perspective, this sequence matters because the game was essentially balanced before it happened. A five-run late burst against a team that had been tied through five innings represents more than routine scoring. It reflects a change in the effectiveness of the opposing pitching staff and New York’s ability to capitalize.

The Yankees did not need another huge offensive explosion after taking control. Their pitching staff protected the five-run lead and closed the game.

Trent Grisham’s Two-Homer Performance

Trent Grisham was the clearest individual star for the Yankees.

His line was:

• 5 at-bats
• 3 hits
• 3 runs
• 4 RBIs
• 2 home runs
• 1 double

A three-hit game is impressive on its own. Adding two home runs and four RBIs makes the performance especially significant.

Grisham accounted for four of New York’s 10 runs batted in, meaning he directly produced 40 percent of the Yankees’ RBI total. He also scored three runs himself.

That combination shows why his performance had such a large effect on the game. He was not simply hitting for power. He was involved in multiple scoring sequences.

His two home runs also gave New York a direct answer to Seattle’s power production. The Mariners hit three homers as a team, but Grisham’s individual two-homer performance helped keep the Yankees’ offense highly productive despite Seattle’s ability to generate runs through the long ball.

Spencer Jones Provides Extra-Base Impact

Spencer Jones was another major contributor.

Jones finished with four at-bats, two hits, and three RBIs. Both of his hits were doubles.

While Grisham supplied the headline power, Jones provided important extra-base production without hitting a home run. His two doubles helped New York create scoring opportunities and contributed to the Yankees’ 13-hit total.

His three RBIs were also second only to Grisham’s four among the Yankees’ leading performers.

This is a useful reminder when evaluating a box score. A player’s value in one game cannot be measured only through home runs. Doubles, run production, baserunning, and the ability to advance into scoring position can be equally important.

Ben Rice’s All-Around Contribution

Ben Rice produced one of the more balanced offensive lines of the game.

He recorded:

• 4 at-bats
• 2 hits
• 3 runs
• 1 RBI
• 1 walk
• 2 stolen bases

Rice’s three runs tied him with Grisham for the highest individual run total among the listed Yankees performers.

His contribution also extended beyond hitting. Two stolen bases show that he affected the game with his speed and baserunning.

This matters because the Yankees did not win solely through home runs. They combined extra-base hits, contact, baserunning, and timely hitting.

Rice’s performance is therefore a good example of how a box score can reveal several different ways a player can influence a game.

Yankees Offensive Breakdown

New York finished with 35 at-bats, 13 hits, 10 runs, and 10 RBIs.

The Yankees’ offensive production included:

• 13 total hits
• 2 home runs
• 6 doubles
• 3 walks
• 8 strikeouts
• 10 RBIs
• 3-for-9 with runners in scoring position
• 5 runners left on base

The Yankees had six doubles in the game. The doubles came from Ryan McMahon, Trent Grisham, Austin Wells, Spencer Jones, who hit two, and Ben Rice.

That extra-base production helped New York create a strong offensive profile even without relying heavily on walks.

The three walks were fewer than Seattle’s seven, but New York compensated by producing more hits and converting a higher percentage of its opportunities with runners in scoring position.

Seattle Mariners Offensive Performance

Seattle’s offense was dangerous but inconsistent.

The Mariners recorded nine hits, five runs, three home runs, seven walks, and eight strikeouts. They also committed no errors.

Randy Arozarena led one of Seattle’s most important individual performances. He went 1-for-4 with two runs, two RBIs, one home run, and one walk.

Dominic Canzone had two hits in five at-bats, scored once, drove in one run, and hit a home run.

Julio Rodríguez also contributed a home run and one RBI.

The Mariners therefore had legitimate power throughout the lineup. Three different players recorded home runs, which explains how Seattle reached five runs despite producing only nine hits.

However, the 1-for-8 performance with runners in scoring position was costly.

Nine runners were left on base, meaning Seattle created opportunities but did not consistently finish those opportunities.

Randy Arozarena’s Impact

Randy Arozarena’s performance deserves particular attention because he contributed in several categories.

His recorded line included:

• 4 at-bats
• 1 hit
• 2 runs
• 2 RBIs
• 1 home run
• 1 walk

The important feature of this line is that his single hit produced substantial offensive value.

Arozarena’s home run contributed two RBIs, and he also scored twice. His walk helped him reach base an additional time.

However, the overall Seattle offense needed more production from opportunities beyond its home runs. The Mariners’ inability to consistently convert runners in scoring position ultimately limited their scoring ceiling.

Dominic Canzone’s Two-Hit Game

Dominic Canzone recorded two hits in five at-bats, along with one run, one RBI, and one home run.

His two-hit performance gave Seattle one of its more reliable sources of contact.

Canzone’s home run also added to the Mariners’ team-leading total of three homers. Seattle’s problem was not an absence of power. The bigger issue was that the rest of the offensive opportunities did not translate into enough runs.

That distinction is important when assessing this matchup. The Mariners were not shut down. They produced nine hits and three homers. They simply did not turn enough of their baserunners into productive scoring situations.

Pitching Comparison

The pitching lines provide another important explanation for the final result.

Seattle’s pitching staff recorded:

• 8.0 innings
• 13 hits allowed
• 10 runs allowed
• 10 earned runs
• 3 walks
• 8 strikeouts
• 2 home runs allowed

New York’s pitching staff recorded:

• 9.0 innings
• 9 hits allowed
• 5 runs allowed
• 5 earned runs
• 7 walks
• 8 strikeouts
• 3 home runs allowed

At first glance, Seattle’s pitching appears to have had one advantage: fewer walks.

But the Yankees allowed only nine hits compared with Seattle’s 13. More importantly, New York’s pitching staff prevented the Mariners from turning their opportunities into a second-half scoring surge.

The Yankees did give up three home runs, yet they limited Seattle to five total runs.

Seattle allowed 13 hits and 10 runs. That difference became especially damaging once New York began producing in the seventh and eighth innings.

Walter Warren’s Start

Walter Warren started for the Yankees and pitched four innings.

His line:

• 4.0 innings
• 6 hits allowed
• 5 runs allowed
• 5 earned runs
• 4 walks
• 3 strikeouts
• 3 home runs allowed

Warren’s outing was not statistically dominant.

Allowing three home runs and five earned runs in four innings put pressure on the rest of the Yankees’ pitching staff. Seattle was able to score five runs against him, and the game was tied 5-5 after five innings.

Yet the Yankees’ relief pitching ultimately prevented the Mariners from adding to that total.

That is a major part of the game’s story. New York’s starter did not need to deliver a shutout-quality performance because the bullpen stabilized the game afterward.

Bryce Miller’s Start for Seattle

Bryce Miller provided Seattle with six innings.

His line was:

• 6.0 innings
• 8 hits allowed
• 5 runs allowed
• 5 earned runs
• 1 walk
• 5 strikeouts
• 1 home run allowed

Miller’s outing was more efficient than Warren’s in several respects. He issued only one walk and struck out five batters.

However, he still allowed eight hits and five earned runs.

The Mariners remained tied at 5-5 after the early stages of the game, but once Miller left, New York’s offense eventually found a way to break through the Seattle pitching staff.

This illustrates why starting pitcher statistics should not be viewed independently from bullpen performance.

Paul Blackburn Earns the Win

Paul Blackburn was credited with the win.

His recorded line was:

• 1.2 innings
• 0 hits allowed
• 0 earned runs
• 0 strikeouts
• 1 walk

Blackburn’s most important contribution was preventing Seattle from responding after New York established its late lead.

He did not need a large strikeout total to be effective. The most important numbers in this particular appearance were the zero hits and zero earned runs allowed.

He helped preserve the Yankees’ advantage during the decisive portion of the game.

Griffin Speier Takes the Loss

Griffin Speier was charged with the loss.

His line included:

• 0.2 innings
• 3 hits allowed
• 3 earned runs
• 1 strikeout
• 2 walks

Speier’s short appearance became especially damaging because New York’s late offensive surge came at exactly the stage of the game when Seattle needed its bullpen to hold the score.

Three hits, three earned runs, and two walks in two-thirds of an inning produced a difficult situation for Seattle.

The contrast between Blackburn and Speier illustrates the importance of relief pitching in this matchup.

The RISP Battle Explains More Than the Home Run Count

One of the most revealing statistics in the game was performance with runners in scoring position.

Seattle went 1-for-8.

New York went 3-for-9.

The Yankees therefore converted three hits in nine RISP opportunities, while Seattle converted only one hit in eight.

Although the difference in raw percentage is not enormous, the practical effect was significant because the game was tied 5-5 before New York’s late scoring burst.

When teams create similar numbers of opportunities, the ability to finish those opportunities becomes critical.

Seattle’s seven walks show that the Mariners were capable of reaching base. Their three home runs show they had power. Their nine hits show they generated contact.

But they needed more timely production.

Why the Yankees Won Despite Allowing Three Home Runs

The final score might initially seem surprising because Seattle hit three home runs and New York hit only two.

Yet the Yankees still won by five runs.

There are several reasons.

First, New York produced 13 hits compared with Seattle’s nine.

Second, the Yankees converted three of nine RISP opportunities while Seattle converted only one of eight.

Third, New York’s late offense was substantially stronger.

Fourth, the Yankees bullpen did not allow Seattle to respond after the score moved from 5-5 to 8-5 and then 10-5.

Fifth, New York left only five runners on base, while Seattle left nine.

This combination demonstrates why baseball analysis should move beyond the most obvious power statistics.

Home runs can change a game instantly, but a team still needs to convert baserunners, limit damage, and perform effectively in late innings.

Inning-by-Inning Game Flow

The scoring pattern helps explain the momentum changes.

Through Five Innings: A 5-5 Battle

By the fifth inning, both teams had scored five runs.

Seattle’s power was already visible, with three home runs eventually accounting for a significant part of its production.

New York, meanwhile, continued to build its hit total.

At 5-5, the game remained open.

Seventh Inning: Yankees Take Control

New York scored three runs in the seventh inning.

The score moved from 5-5 to 8-5.

This was the first major separation of the afternoon.

The Yankees did not merely score a single go-ahead run. They created a three-run cushion.

Eighth Inning: New York Extends the Lead

The Yankees scored another two runs in the eighth.

The advantage became 10-5.

At that point, Seattle needed a major comeback, but the Yankees pitching staff prevented the Mariners from returning to the game.

The five runs scored during the seventh and eighth innings were therefore the decisive stretch.

What the Match Says About Offensive Efficiency

The matchup offers a useful lesson in offensive efficiency.

Seattle reached base through seven walks, while New York had only three. On paper, that could suggest a Mariners advantage in plate discipline.

But getting on base is only part of offensive success.

Seattle left nine runners on base and went 1-for-8 with runners in scoring position.

New York left five runners on base and went 3-for-9 with runners in scoring position.

The Yankees therefore made more of the opportunities that mattered most.

Their 13-hit total also helped compensate for the lower walk count.

This is why a box score should be read as a collection of connected statistics rather than as isolated numbers.

Baserunning Made a Difference

Ben Rice’s two stolen bases and Spencer Jones’ five stolen bases listed in the supplied team data add another layer to New York’s performance.

The Yankees combined power hitting with aggressive baserunning.

The presence of stolen bases alongside six doubles and two home runs shows that New York created pressure in multiple ways.

Even when a player does not drive in a run directly, advancing into scoring position can alter the defensive strategy and create opportunities for the next hitter.

This is one reason a complete player evaluation should include more than batting average or home run totals.

Team Comparison at a Glance

Statistic	Mariners	Yankees
Runs	5	10
Hits	9	13
Errors	0	1
Home Runs	3	2
Walks	7	3
Strikeouts	8	8
RISP	1-for-8	3-for-9
Left on Base	9	5
Innings Pitched	8.0	9.0
Runs Allowed	10	5
Earned Runs Allowed	10	5

The table makes the central contrast clear.

Seattle had more walks and more home runs.

New York had more hits, more runs, better RISP production, fewer runners left on base, and a stronger overall scoring result.

Player Performances That Shaped the Result

Yankees

Trent Grisham: 3-for-5, 3 runs, 4 RBIs, 2 home runs.

Spencer Jones: 2-for-4, 3 RBIs, 2 doubles.

Ben Rice: 2-for-4, 3 runs, 1 RBI, 1 walk, 2 stolen bases.

Ryan McMahon: Recorded a double and contributed to the Yankees’ extra-base production.

Austin Wells: Added a double.

Mariners

Randy Arozarena: 1-for-4, 2 runs, 2 RBIs, 1 home run, 1 walk.

Dominic Canzone: 2-for-5, 1 run, 1 RBI, 1 home run.

Julio Rodríguez: Hit a home run and drove in one run.

Josh Naylor: Recorded one RBI.

Bryan Donovan: Recorded a double.

These performances show that both teams had individual offensive highlights. The difference was how consistently those contributions translated into the final score.

What Went Wrong for Seattle?

Seattle’s biggest problem was not a lack of offensive talent.

The Mariners produced three home runs, nine hits, and seven walks.

The bigger issue was conversion.

Going 1-for-8 with runners in scoring position meant many opportunities did not become productive hits. Leaving nine runners on base further emphasized the missed chances.

The pitching staff then allowed 13 hits and 10 runs.

The combination was difficult to overcome.

A team can survive one weakness in a single game. It is much harder to overcome inefficient situational hitting and a bullpen breakdown at the same time.

What Worked for New York?

The Yankees showed several strengths.

Their 13-hit attack kept pressure on Seattle pitching.

Grisham’s two home runs supplied major power.

Jones’ two doubles and three RBIs provided timely extra-base production.

Rice added baserunning value with two stolen bases and scored three times.

Most importantly, New York’s pitching staff held Seattle scoreless after the Mariners had reached five runs.

The Yankees also produced their best offensive stretch when the game was still within reach.

That timing was crucial.

Series Context

The supplied series information shows that New York won the series 2-1.

The listed games were:

• Game 1: Mariners 1, Yankees 4
• Game 2: Mariners 5, Yankees 10
• Game 3: Mariners 1, Yankees 0

The series therefore featured three very different scoring patterns.

New York won the first game 4-1.

The Yankees then won the high-scoring second game 10-5.

Seattle responded with a 1-0 victory in the third listed game.

This contrast makes the second game particularly notable. It was by far the highest-scoring contest in the supplied series results.

The series also demonstrates how different baseball games can become even when the same two teams are involved. One contest can be dominated by pitching, another by late offense, and another by power hitting.

A Closer Look at the Yankees’ Offensive Balance

The Yankees’ 10-run performance was not built around one statistical category.

They had:

• 13 hits
• 2 home runs
• 6 doubles
• 3 walks
• 10 RBIs
• 3-for-9 RISP
• 2 stolen bases credited in the supplied data

That is a diverse offensive profile.

Grisham provided power.

Jones provided doubles and RBIs.

Rice provided runs, a walk, hits, and stolen bases.

Other players added doubles to keep the lineup moving.

The result was an offense that did not have to depend on one specific way of scoring.

A Closer Look at Seattle’s Offensive Profile

Seattle’s offense was more power-driven.

The Mariners recorded three home runs from Arozarena, Rodríguez, and Canzone.

They also collected seven walks.

Yet the nine-hit total was four fewer than New York’s 13.

Seattle’s biggest statistical weakness was its inability to maximize scoring opportunities.

A 1-for-8 RISP result means the Mariners had opportunities but struggled to turn them into productive hits.

That is particularly costly in a game where the opposing team is scoring at a similar rate early and then pulling away late.

Why the Seventh and Eighth Innings Matter Most

When reviewing this game, it is tempting to focus on the final 10-5 score.

A more useful approach is to identify when the game actually changed.

That moment came in the seventh inning.

At 5-5, both teams had a realistic path to victory.

New York then scored three runs.

That changed the game from a tie into an 8-5 Yankees advantage.

The two-run eighth inning then made the margin five.

The sequence from 5-5 to 10-5 is therefore the most important portion of the game from a competitive standpoint.

It explains why New York won even though Seattle had already hit three home runs.

Key Statistical Takeaways

Several numbers stand out from the matchup.

13 Yankees hits: New York consistently generated contact.

9 Mariners hits: Seattle produced enough offense to stay competitive but not enough to match New York late.

3 Mariners home runs: Seattle’s power was real, but it did not translate into enough total runs.

2 Grisham home runs: One player accounted for half of New York’s home run total.

4 Grisham RBIs: He led all listed Yankees hitters in run production.

3 Jones RBIs: His doubles became important sources of extra-base offense.

3 Rice runs: His ability to reach base and move around the bases added significant value.

1-for-8 Mariners RISP: This was one of Seattle’s biggest offensive shortcomings.

3-for-9 Yankees RISP: New York performed better in important scoring situations.

9 Mariners left on base: Seattle had opportunities that remained unfinished.

5 Yankees left on base: New York was more efficient with its opportunities.

5 late Yankees runs: The seventh and eighth innings decided the contest.

How to Read This Box Score Correctly

A useful way to analyze a baseball box score is to move from broad results to individual causes.

Start with the final score.

Then compare hits, walks, home runs, and errors.

After that, examine runners in scoring position and runners left on base.

Next, study the starting pitching.

Finally, look at the bullpen and identify the innings where the game changed.

Using that process here produces a clear conclusion.

The Yankees won because they combined more hits with better situational hitting and a decisive late offensive run. Seattle created plenty of opportunities but did not convert enough of them, while its pitching staff eventually allowed New York to pull away.

That is a more complete explanation than simply saying the Yankees scored 10 runs.

What These Stats Mean for Future Matchup Analysis

The new york yankees vs seattle mariners match player stats also provide a useful framework for evaluating future meetings between the clubs.

For hitters, the key question is not only who hits home runs. It is who consistently reaches base, produces extra-base hits, drives in runners, and scores.

For pitchers, innings and earned runs matter, but so do walks, home runs allowed, and the ability to prevent late-inning rallies.

For teams, RISP performance and runners left on base can reveal why a club with strong raw offensive numbers still loses.

This game is a good example because Seattle actually won several superficial statistical categories, including home runs and walks, but New York won the categories that translated more directly into the final score.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the Yankees and Mariners?

The New York Yankees defeated the Seattle Mariners 10-5 on August 13, 2026, at Yankee Stadium.

Who was the best Yankees player in the game?

Trent Grisham was the standout Yankees hitter. He went 3-for-5 with three runs, four RBIs, and two home runs.

Who hit home runs for the Mariners?

Randy Arozarena, Julio Rodríguez, and Dominic Canzone each hit a home run for Seattle.

How many hits did each team record?

The Yankees recorded 13 hits, while the Mariners finished with nine.

Which team performed better with runners in scoring position?

The Yankees went 3-for-9 with runners in scoring position. Seattle went 1-for-8.

What was the key turning point?

The key turning point came after the game was tied 5-5. New York scored three runs in the seventh inning and two more in the eighth, turning the tie into a 10-5 victory.

Conclusion

The new york yankees vs seattle mariners match player stats from August 13, 2026, reveal a game in which New York’s efficiency ultimately outweighed Seattle’s power.

The Mariners hit three home runs and drew seven walks, but they finished with only five runs. Their 1-for-8 performance with runners in scoring position and nine runners left on base shows how many opportunities failed to become productive scoring plays.

New York produced 13 hits, scored 10 runs, and went 3-for-9 with runners in scoring position. Trent Grisham led the way with two home runs, three hits, three runs, and four RBIs. Spencer Jones added two doubles and three RBIs, while Ben Rice contributed two hits, three runs, a walk, and two stolen bases.

The pitching story was equally important. Walter Warren allowed five runs in four innings, but the Yankees bullpen kept Seattle from adding to its total. Paul Blackburn earned the win after allowing no hits and no earned runs in 1.2 innings. Griffin Speier was charged with the loss after allowing three hits and three earned runs in two-thirds of an inning.

Ultimately, the game was decided by the five runs New York scored in the seventh and eighth innings. The Yankees transformed a 5-5 tie into an 8-5 lead and then extended it to 10-5. The final statistics therefore reflect more than a difference in total runs. They show the value of timely hitting, extra-base production, baserunning, bullpen stability, and execution in high-leverage situations.