Baltimore Ravens vs Cleveland Browns Match Player Stats
The baltimore ravens vs cleveland browns match player stats from Week 11 tell a much more detailed story than the 23-16 final score alone. Baltimore defeated Cleveland on the road, but the game was not a simple offensive showcase. The Ravens produced 351 total yards, controlled the ground game, and scored two rushing touchdowns. Cleveland managed only 187 total yards and did not score an offensive touchdown.
The official NFL game center lists the matchup as a Week 11 game played on November 16, 2025, at Huntington Bank Field in Cleveland. The Ravens entered the contest at 4-5 and moved to 5-5 after the victory, while Cleveland fell to 2-8. The supplied statistics also identify Baltimore as 3-2 on the road and Cleveland as 2-3 at home entering this result.
For anyone studying player performance, this matchup is particularly interesting because the Ravens won despite Lamar Jackson throwing two interceptions. Derrick Henry provided the strongest offensive foundation with 103 rushing yards and a touchdown, while Zay Flowers led Baltimore in receiving with 78 yards.
Cleveland had some individual production, especially from Cedric Tillman, but its offense struggled to sustain drives. The Browns finished with only 10 first downs and converted just 2 of 14 third downs. Baltimore recorded 17 first downs and converted 5 of 13 third downs.
Baltimore Ravens vs Cleveland Browns Match Player Stats
The most useful way to understand this game is to separate the individual numbers from the team results. A box score can show who gained yards, but it does not always explain why one team won.
Baltimore’s advantage came from several areas working together:
- 184 rushing yards
- 6.1 yards per rushing attempt
- 351 total offensive yards
- Two rushing touchdowns
- Three successful field goals
- 32:59 time of possession
- Five sacks by the Cleveland defense, but Baltimore still won
- A defensive interception by Nate Wiggins
- Strong field position through kickoff and punt returns
Cleveland’s biggest problem was offensive efficiency. The Browns gained only 106 rushing yards and 115 gross passing yards. After sacks, they were left with only 81 net passing yards. Their offense averaged just 3.5 yards per play.
That difference is central to understanding the player statistics.
Game Summary and Final Score
The Ravens won 23-16.
Baltimore scored 3 points in the first quarter, 7 in the second, none in the third, and 13 in the fourth. Cleveland scored 3 points in the first quarter and 13 in the second, but failed to score in either the third or fourth quarter.
That scoring pattern matters.
Cleveland actually held a 16-10 lead at halftime. However, Baltimore produced all 13 points in the final quarter while Cleveland’s offense went quiet.
The Ravens’ fourth-quarter response was the biggest team-level difference in the contest. They finished the game with 23 points despite struggling to turn some drives into touchdowns.
Baltimore scored two offensive touchdowns, both on the ground. Cleveland’s only touchdown came from a defensive interception return.
That means the Browns did not produce a passing or rushing touchdown during the game.
The official NFL statistics show Baltimore finished with 17 first downs compared with Cleveland’s 10. The Ravens also held advantages in total yards, rushing yards, passing efficiency, third-down conversions, and time of possession.
For the complete official game record, the NFL game center provides the matchup information, scoring summary, and official team statistics.
Lamar Jackson Passing Performance
Lamar Jackson’s passing line was one of the most unusual parts of the game.
He completed 14 of 25 passes for 193 yards. His average was 7.7 yards per attempt, and he did not throw a touchdown. He also threw two interceptions.
His recorded passer rating was 47.6, while his QBR was 30.1.
On the surface, those numbers do not look like the profile of a winning quarterback. However, the overall Baltimore offense did enough in other areas to compensate.
Jackson was also sacked five times for 26 yards. Those sacks reduced Baltimore’s net passing output to 167 yards.
The important distinction here is between gross passing production and net passing production. Jackson’s 193 passing yards show what he gained through completed passes, while the 26 sack yards lost reduced the team’s net passing figure.
His passing line was therefore:
| Statistic | Lamar Jackson |
| Completions | 14 |
| Attempts | 25 |
| Completion Rate | 56.0% |
| Passing Yards | 193 |
| Yards per Attempt | 7.7 |
| Passing TDs | 0 |
| Interceptions | 2 |
| Sacks | 5 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 26 |
| QBR | 30.1 |
| Passer Rating | 47.6 |
The two interceptions were costly, but neither prevented Baltimore from winning.
This is an important reminder when evaluating quarterback statistics. A quarterback’s passing line should be considered alongside rushing production, defensive support, field position, and scoring efficiency.
Jackson’s biggest positive number was his 7.7 yards per attempt. That figure shows Baltimore was capable of producing meaningful gains when the passing game connected.
At the same time, the two interceptions and five sacks demonstrate that Cleveland’s defense created legitimate pressure.
Derrick Henry Leads the Ravens Ground Game
Derrick Henry was the clearest offensive standout for Baltimore.
He carried the ball 18 times for 103 yards. His average was 5.7 yards per carry, and he produced one touchdown.
His longest run covered 59 yards.
That 59-yard gain had a major impact on his overall statistical profile. Without it, his average would look very different, which is why long plays should always be considered when evaluating rushing efficiency.
Henry’s final line was:
| Statistic | Derrick Henry |
| Carries | 18 |
| Rushing Yards | 103 |
| Average | 5.7 |
| Rushing TD | 1 |
| Longest Run | 59 |
Henry was the only Baltimore running back to reach 100 rushing yards.
His workload also helped Baltimore maintain offensive balance. The Ravens finished with 30 rushing attempts and 184 rushing yards, averaging 6.1 yards per attempt.
That was a major advantage over Cleveland.
The Browns had 25 rushing attempts for 106 yards, averaging only 4.2 yards per attempt.
The difference was 78 rushing yards.
In a game decided by seven points, that gap is significant.
Mark Andrews Produces a Surprising Rushing Touchdown
One of the most unusual individual statistics came from Mark Andrews.
Andrews recorded one rushing attempt for 35 yards and a touchdown.
His only rushing attempt therefore produced a 35-yard average.
That play was not representative of a normal workload, but it had an enormous effect on Baltimore’s scoring total.
Andrews also contributed as a receiver, catching three passes for 32 yards.
His combined production was therefore:
- 1 rushing attempt
- 35 rushing yards
- 1 rushing touchdown
- 3 receptions
- 32 receiving yards
The combination of Henry’s ground production and Andrews’ unusual rushing touchdown helped Baltimore finish with two rushing scores.
Baltimore Receiving Statistics
Zay Flowers was Baltimore’s leading receiver.
Flowers caught three passes for 78 yards, averaging 26.0 yards per reception.
His 78 receiving yards represented a large portion of Baltimore’s 193 passing yards.
His average of 26.0 yards per reception was also the highest listed receiving average among Baltimore players with receptions.
Baltimore’s receiving production was distributed as follows:
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average |
| Zay Flowers | 3 | 78 | 26.0 |
| Mark Andrews | 3 | 32 | 10.7 |
| Keaton Mitchell | 2 | 23 | 11.5 |
| Derrick Henry | 2 | 19 | 9.5 |
| Rasheen Ali | 1 | 15 | 15.0 |
| Isaiah Likely | 2 | 15 | 7.5 |
| DeAndre Hopkins | 1 | 11 | 11.0 |
Baltimore finished with 14 receptions for 193 receiving yards, an average of 13.8 yards per reception.
No Baltimore receiver recorded a touchdown.
That makes Flowers’ 78-yard performance particularly important because he supplied explosive receiving production even without finding the end zone.
The distribution also shows that Baltimore did not depend entirely on one receiver. Andrews, Mitchell, Henry, Ali, Likely, and Hopkins all contributed receiving yards.
Cleveland Browns Passing Statistics
Cleveland used two quarterbacks in the game.
Dillon Gabriel completed 7 of 10 passes for 68 yards. He averaged 6.8 yards per attempt and did not throw a touchdown or interception.
Shedeur Sanders completed 4 of 16 attempts for 47 yards. He also failed to throw a touchdown and recorded one interception.
Together, they produced 115 gross passing yards.
Dillon Gabriel
Gabriel’s passing line was:
| Statistic | Dillon Gabriel |
| Completions | 7 |
| Attempts | 10 |
| Passing Yards | 68 |
| Average | 6.8 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 7 |
| QBR | 8.6 |
| Passer Rating | 88.8 |
Gabriel was more efficient than Sanders in completion percentage and avoided an interception.
However, his limited passing volume meant Cleveland did not generate enough total offensive production.
Shedeur Sanders
Sanders completed 4 of 16 attempts for 47 yards.
His average was only 2.9 yards per attempt.
He threw one interception and was sacked twice for 27 yards.
His QBR was 1.8, while his passer rating was 13.5.
| Statistic | Shedeur Sanders |
| Completions | 4 |
| Attempts | 16 |
| Passing Yards | 47 |
| Average | 2.9 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 27 |
| QBR | 1.8 |
| Passer Rating | 13.5 |
The combination of low completion volume, limited yardage, pressure, and the interception made it difficult for Cleveland to sustain offensive drives.
Cleveland Rushing Statistics
Quinshon Judkins led the Browns in rushing.
He carried the ball 17 times for 59 yards, averaging 3.5 yards per attempt.
That was a respectable workload but not enough to consistently move the offense.
Cleveland’s rushing production was:
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average |
| Quinshon Judkins | 17 | 59 | 3.5 |
| Dylan Sampson | 1 | 19 | 19.0 |
| Shedeur Sanders | 3 | 16 | 5.3 |
| Isaiah Bond | 1 | 8 | 8.0 |
| Jerome Ford | 1 | 2 | 2.0 |
| Dillon Gabriel | 2 | 2 | 1.0 |
The Browns finished with 25 rushing attempts for 106 yards and no rushing touchdowns.
Dylan Sampson had the highest average at 19.0 yards per carry, but he had only one rushing attempt.
This is another example of why averages should be considered with workload. A single explosive carry can produce an excellent average without meaningfully changing the overall offensive performance.
Cleveland Receiving Statistics
Cedric Tillman led Cleveland in receiving yards.
He caught three passes for 52 yards, averaging 17.3 yards per reception.
Harold Fannin Jr. added two catches for 26 yards, while Jerry Jeudy recorded three receptions for 21 yards.
Cleveland’s receiving numbers were:
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average |
| Cedric Tillman | 3 | 52 | 17.3 |
| Harold Fannin Jr. | 2 | 26 | 13.0 |
| Jerry Jeudy | 3 | 21 | 7.0 |
| Malachi Corley | 2 | 9 | 4.5 |
| David Njoku | 1 | 7 | 7.0 |
The Browns finished with 11 receptions for 115 yards.
There were no Cleveland receiving touchdowns.
Tillman’s 52 yards accounted for almost half of the Browns’ receiving production.
That makes him the clearest receiving bright spot in the Cleveland offense.
However, the overall passing game remained limited because the Browns did not consistently convert completions into sustained drives.
Defensive Performance and Turnovers
Defense was a major factor in the final result.
Baltimore recorded 62 tackles, including 34 solo tackles. The Ravens also registered three sacks, six tackles for loss, nine passes defended, and 10 quarterback hits.
Cleveland’s defense recorded 64 tackles, including 41 solo tackles. The Browns produced five sacks, 10 tackles for loss, three passes defended, and seven quarterback hits.
On raw defensive pressure, Cleveland actually had some strong numbers.
The Browns recorded two more sacks than Baltimore.
They also produced two interceptions.
However, one of those interceptions became a defensive touchdown, while the other did not result in the same scoring impact.
The biggest defensive takeaway for Baltimore was an interception by Nate Wiggins.
Wiggins returned his interception 14 yards.
Cleveland’s interceptions came from Devin Bush and Carson Schwesinger.
Bush returned his interception 23 yards for a touchdown, giving Cleveland a defensive score.
Schwesinger returned his interception nine yards.
This created an unusual statistical situation. Baltimore threw two interceptions but still won, while Cleveland’s defense scored the only Cleveland touchdown of the game.
Devin Bush and the Browns Defensive Touchdown
Devin Bush’s interception return was one of Cleveland’s biggest individual moments.
The Browns did not score an offensive touchdown, so the defensive return became the team’s only touchdown.
Bush intercepted Lamar Jackson and returned the ball 23 yards for a touchdown.
That play helped Cleveland build its 16-point total.
It also demonstrates why turnover statistics cannot be evaluated only by counting interceptions.
An interception can:
- End an opponent’s scoring opportunity
- Change field position
- Create a short field
- Produce a defensive touchdown
- Shift momentum
Bush’s interception achieved the most valuable possible outcome.
Even so, Cleveland’s defense could not completely prevent Baltimore from scoring enough points to win.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams played a steady role throughout the matchup.
Baltimore’s Tyler Loop converted all three of his field-goal attempts.
He also made both extra-point attempts.
That gave him 11 total points.
His longest successful field goal was 44 yards.
Cleveland’s Andre Szmyt was also perfect on field goals.
He converted all three attempts and made his only extra-point attempt.
His longest field goal was 46 yards, and he scored 10 points.
The kicking comparison was:
| Statistic | Tyler Loop | Andre Szmyt |
| Field Goals | 3/3 | 3/3 |
| FG Percentage | 100% | 100% |
| Long FG | 44 | 46 |
| Extra Points | 2/2 | 1/1 |
| Total Points | 11 | 10 |
Both kickers were perfect.
That means the difference in the kicking game came largely from Baltimore scoring one more extra point because the Ravens scored two offensive touchdowns compared with Cleveland’s one defensive touchdown.
Return Game Comparison
Baltimore finished with 115 kickoff return yards on four returns.
Keaton Mitchell had two returns for 58 yards, averaging 29.0 yards per return.
LaJohntay Wester returned one kickoff for 32 yards, while Rasheen Ali had one for 25 yards.
Cleveland produced 123 kickoff return yards on five attempts.
Malachi Corley had three returns for 75 yards, while Dylan Sampson had two for 48 yards.
The Browns therefore had a small advantage in kickoff return yardage.
Baltimore also had three punt returns for 26 yards.
Wester handled all three returns, averaging 8.7 yards with a long return of 19 yards.
Cleveland had two punt returns for 18 yards, with Gage Larvadain averaging 9.0 yards per return.
The return game was relatively balanced and was not the primary reason for the final result.
Punting Comparison
Jordan Stout punted four times for Baltimore.
He recorded 176 total punt yards, averaging 44.0 yards per punt. One punt went for a touchback, while two landed inside the 20-yard line.
His longest punt was 52 yards.
Corey Bojorquez punted six times for Cleveland.
He produced 299 total yards and averaged 49.8 yards per punt. One punt resulted in a touchback, one landed inside the 20, and his longest punt went 63 yards.
Cleveland therefore had the stronger gross punting average.
However, punting performance must be considered alongside offensive efficiency. Cleveland punted six times because its offense struggled to maintain drives.
That distinction is important.
A strong punting average does not necessarily indicate a strong overall offensive performance.
The Biggest Team Statistical Difference
The most important number may be total offense.
Baltimore produced 351 total yards.
Cleveland produced 187.
That is a difference of 164 yards.
Baltimore also averaged 5.9 yards per offensive play, compared with Cleveland’s 3.5.
The Ravens ran 60 offensive plays.
The Browns ran 54.
Despite running only six more plays, Baltimore generated dramatically more yardage.
The team comparison was:
| Category | Ravens | Browns |
| Final Score | 23 | 16 |
| First Downs | 17 | 10 |
| Total Yards | 351 | 187 |
| Offensive Plays | 60 | 54 |
| Yards per Play | 5.9 | 3.5 |
| Rushing Yards | 184 | 106 |
| Passing Yards | 193 | 115 |
| Net Passing Yards | 167 | 81 |
| Third Down | 5/13 | 2/14 |
| Fourth Down | 1/1 | 0/1 |
| Time of Possession | 32:59 | 27:01 |
| Turnovers Lost | 2 | 1 |
These numbers explain why Baltimore won even though Cleveland’s defense produced more sacks and the Ravens threw two interceptions.
Baltimore was substantially more productive between the 20s.
The Ravens moved the ball more efficiently, stayed on the field longer, and generated considerably more rushing production.
Third Down Was a Major Factor
Third-down efficiency is one of the clearest indicators of whether an offense can sustain possession.
Baltimore converted five of 13 third downs.
That works out to 38.5 percent.
Cleveland converted only two of 14.
That was 14.3 percent.
The difference was significant.
Baltimore therefore had more opportunities to keep drives alive.
Cleveland repeatedly faced situations where it needed to convert to continue possession, but the offense could not maintain enough consistency.
The third-down numbers also help explain the time-of-possession advantage.
Baltimore held the ball for 32:59.
Cleveland had possession for 27:01.
The five-minute-plus difference gave Baltimore additional opportunities to control the game.
Red Zone Efficiency
Baltimore was not dominant in the red zone.
The Ravens finished one of four in red-zone opportunities, a 25 percent conversion rate.
Cleveland finished zero of two.
This is important because the final score could have been even larger for Baltimore if it had converted more of its red-zone chances.
Instead, Baltimore relied heavily on field goals.
The Ravens made all three field-goal attempts.
That combination of imperfect red-zone execution and perfect kicking allowed Baltimore to keep adding points.
Cleveland had fewer red-zone opportunities and failed to score a touchdown from those opportunities.
This was another area where Baltimore’s ability to take points when available mattered.
Why Lamar Jackson’s Two Interceptions Did Not Decide the Game
A common mistake when reading quarterback statistics is to assume that the player with fewer turnovers automatically had the better overall game.
The numbers here are more complicated.
Jackson threw two interceptions.
Gabriel threw none, while Sanders threw one.
Therefore, Cleveland’s quarterbacks combined for one interception.
Yet Baltimore won by seven points.
Why?
Because football is a team sport, and the Ravens were more productive in other phases.
Baltimore rushed for 184 yards.
Cleveland rushed for 106.
Baltimore gained 351 total yards.
Cleveland gained 187.
- Baltimore converted more third downs.
- Baltimore controlled possession.
- Baltimore scored two offensive touchdowns.
Cleveland’s only touchdown came from the defense.
The lesson from the player statistics is not that interceptions are unimportant. They are extremely important.
The lesson is that turnovers are only one part of the complete performance profile.
What the Stats Say About Derrick Henry’s Impact
Henry’s 103 rushing yards were central to Baltimore’s victory.
The Ravens did not need Jackson to throw a touchdown pass because the running game created enough offensive production to support the scoring attack.
Henry’s 18 carries represented 60 percent of Baltimore’s 30 rushing attempts.
He also produced the team’s 59-yard longest run.
That explosive play is especially important because it gave Baltimore a major chunk of yardage without requiring a long series of successful plays.
Henry’s performance also helped reduce the pressure on Jackson.
With the quarterback absorbing five sacks and throwing two interceptions, Baltimore needed another dependable source of offense.
Henry provided it.
What the Stats Say About Cleveland’s Offense
Cleveland’s offense had several individual contributors but lacked overall consistency.
Tillman led the receiving group with 52 yards.
Judkins led the rushing attack with 59 yards.
Gabriel completed seven of 10 passes without an interception.
However, Cleveland still produced only 187 total yards.
The biggest issue was not necessarily one player’s individual performance.
It was the lack of sustained production across the offense.
The Browns averaged only 3.5 yards per offensive play.
They also converted only two third downs.
Those numbers made it difficult to maintain drives.
When an offense cannot consistently reach third-and-manageable situations or convert third downs, even good individual plays can become isolated moments.
That is what the team statistics suggest happened here.
Key Takeaways From the Match
Several conclusions stand out from the complete statistical picture.
1. Baltimore won the line of scrimmage battle on offense
The Ravens rushed for 184 yards at 6.1 yards per carry.
That was 78 more rushing yards than Cleveland.
2. Derrick Henry was the main offensive engine
His 103 yards and one touchdown gave Baltimore a dependable ground presence.
3. Zay Flowers supplied explosive receiving production
His three receptions produced 78 yards.
His 26.0 yards per catch was a major source of big-play offense.
4. Cleveland’s defense created pressure
The Browns recorded five sacks and two interceptions.
That shows the defense had opportunities to disrupt Baltimore.
5. Cleveland’s offense struggled to convert
Two successful third-down conversions from 14 attempts was a major limitation.
6. Baltimore’s defense produced enough stops
The Ravens allowed only 187 total yards and no offensive touchdowns.
7. Special teams were reliable
Both kickers made every field-goal attempt.
8. The fourth quarter decided the game
Baltimore scored 13 points in the fourth quarter.
Cleveland scored zero.
That late-game difference transformed a 16-10 halftime deficit into a 23-16 Ravens victory.
A Deeper Look at the Player Statistics
The most useful insight from this matchup is that no single box-score category explains the result.
Jackson’s passing numbers were below his usual standard.
Henry’s rushing performance was excellent.
Flowers created explosive receiving plays.
The Browns’ defense generated five sacks and two interceptions.
Cleveland’s special teams were competitive.
Yet Baltimore still controlled the most important team metrics.
The Ravens produced 351 yards compared with 187 for Cleveland.
- They gained 184 rushing yards compared with 106.
- They converted 38.5 percent of third downs compared with 14.3 percent.
- They possessed the ball for nearly six more minutes.
Those differences created enough offensive volume to overcome Baltimore’s turnover issues.
For analysts, this is why the best approach is to read player statistics in layers.
First, look at production.
Then examine efficiency.
Then consider workload.
Finally, compare individual numbers with team-level outcomes.
That process prevents one unusual statistic from dominating the analysis.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Ravens vs Browns game in Week 11 of 2025?
The Baltimore Ravens defeated the Cleveland Browns 23-16 in Week 11 of the 2025 NFL season. The official NFL record lists the game on November 16, 2025, at Huntington Bank Field in Cleveland.
Who was Baltimore’s leading rusher?
Derrick Henry led Baltimore with 18 carries for 103 yards and one touchdown. His longest run was 59 yards.
Who led the Ravens in receiving?
Zay Flowers led Baltimore with three receptions for 78 yards. He averaged 26.0 yards per reception.
How did Lamar Jackson perform?
Jackson completed 14 of 25 passes for 193 yards, with no passing touchdowns and two interceptions. He was sacked five times for 26 yards.
Who scored Cleveland’s touchdown?
Devin Bush scored Cleveland’s only touchdown on a 23-yard interception return.
Which team had more total yards?
Baltimore had 351 total yards, while Cleveland had 187. The Ravens therefore produced 164 more yards than the Browns.
Conclusion
The baltimore ravens vs cleveland browns match player stats show a game that was much closer on the scoreboard than it was in overall offensive production.
Baltimore won 23-16 despite Lamar Jackson throwing two interceptions. The deciding factor was the Ravens’ ability to generate consistent yardage through the running game, especially with Derrick Henry producing 103 yards and a touchdown.
Zay Flowers provided the team’s biggest receiving plays with 78 yards on only three catches. Mark Andrews also delivered an unusual but important contribution with a 35-yard rushing touchdown.
Cleveland’s defense deserves credit for producing five sacks and two interceptions. Devin Bush turned one of those interceptions into a touchdown, which became the Browns’ only touchdown of the game.
However, Cleveland’s offense struggled to respond.
The Browns finished with only 187 total yards, 10 first downs, and two successful third-down conversions. Their inability to sustain drives became increasingly costly as the game progressed.
Baltimore’s 184 rushing yards, 351 total yards, stronger third-down performance, and nearly 33 minutes of possession ultimately provided the winning formula.
The final score says Baltimore won by seven points. The deeper statistics show why that seven-point margin held. The Ravens were more productive on offense, more efficient on key downs, and stronger in the rushing game.
For readers studying player performance, the biggest lesson is simple: individual statistics matter most when they are connected to the larger team picture. Jackson’s interceptions, Henry’s rushing production, Flowers’ explosive catches, Cleveland’s defensive pressure, and the fourth-quarter scoring surge all contributed to the final result.
That broader view makes the box score far more useful than simply identifying the highest yardage totals.
