Detroit Pistons vs 76ers Match Player Stats

The detroit pistons vs 76ers match player stats from March 13, 2026, tell a much clearer story than the final score alone. Detroit Pistons defeated the Philadelphia 76ers 131-109 at Little Caesars Arena in Detroit, extending their season-series advantage to 3-0. Detroit entered the game with a 47-18 record and an impressive 25-8 home mark, while Philadelphia came in at 35-31 and 17-15 on the road. The 22-point result was built on efficient shooting, strong ball movement, superior rebounding, and balanced scoring across the Detroit lineup.

For anyone reviewing the box score, this game provides several useful takeaways. Detroit shot 54% from the field, connected on 40% of its three-point attempts, and converted an exceptional 95% of its free throws. The Pistons also recorded 37 assists on 48 made field goals, showing how effectively they created quality scoring opportunities. Philadelphia had some productive individual performances, particularly from its bench, but struggled to match Detroit’s efficiency and consistency.

Game Overview

The matchup took place on March 13, 2026, at Little Caesars Arena in Detroit, Michigan, in front of an attendance of 20,062.

Detroit controlled the game from the opening quarter. The Pistons scored 36 points in the first period while Philadelphia managed 27. The 9-point opening-quarter advantage established the tone for the rest of the night.

Philadelphia responded with 33 points in the second quarter, matching Detroit’s 33 points during that period. That kept the game competitive at halftime, but Detroit’s offense separated the teams again after the break.

The third quarter proved particularly important. Detroit scored 35 points while Philadelphia scored only 21. That 14-point advantage effectively transformed the game from a competitive matchup into a comfortable Detroit victory.

The fourth quarter was more balanced, with Philadelphia scoring 28 points and Detroit scoring 27. By that point, however, Detroit had already established a substantial lead.

Final Score

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Final
Philadelphia 76ers	27	33	21	28	109
Detroit Pistons	36	33	35	27	131

Detroit won by 22 points.

The season series also moved decisively in Detroit’s favor, with the Pistons leading Philadelphia 3-0.

Detroit Pistons vs 76ers Match Player Stats: Team Comparison

The team statistics explain why Detroit won so convincingly.

Category	Philadelphia 76ers	Detroit Pistons
Points	109	131
Field Goals	42-90	48-89
Field Goal %	47%	54%
Three-Pointers	8-35	14-35
Three-Point %	23%	40%
Free Throws	17-24	21-22
Free Throw %	71%	95%
Rebounds	35	40
Assists	20	37
Turnovers	15	17
Steals	10	10
Blocks	8	7
Offensive Rebounds	11	10
Defensive Rebounds	24	30
Fouls	17	20

The most striking difference was not simply the 22-point margin. Detroit generated much more efficient offense.

The Pistons made 48 of 89 field-goal attempts, while Philadelphia made 42 of 90. That means Detroit scored more points despite taking one fewer field-goal attempt.

The three-point difference was even more meaningful. Both teams attempted 35 three-pointers, but Detroit made 14 compared with Philadelphia’s eight. That created an 18-point advantage from three-point makes alone.

Detroit also dominated the assist category, recording 37 assists compared with Philadelphia’s 20. This is one of the strongest indicators of the Pistons’ offensive execution.

Detroit’s Shooting Efficiency Was the Difference

Detroit’s 54% field-goal percentage was one of the biggest reasons the team produced 131 points.

The Pistons did not rely on one player to carry the offense. Instead, several players converted efficiently while the team’s ball movement created additional opportunities.

Duncan Robinson was particularly effective. He scored 19 points while shooting 7-for-10 from the field and 5-for-7 from three-point range. His five made three-pointers were a major component of Detroit’s perimeter success.

Tobias Harris added 15 points on 6-for-11 shooting and made two of his three three-point attempts.

Jalen Duren was even more efficient around the basket. He scored 14 points on 6-for-7 shooting and added 10 rebounds.

Isaiah Stewart provided another efficient contribution from the bench. He finished with 13 points while making all five of his field-goal attempts.

Detroit’s overall efficiency was therefore created through multiple sources rather than one dominant scorer.

Duncan Robinson’s Perimeter Impact

Duncan Robinson finished with 19 points, making him Detroit’s leading scorer among the starters.

His shooting line was especially impressive:

• 19 points
• 7-for-10 field goals
• 5-for-7 three-pointers
• 2 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 1 steal
• +18 plus/minus

The five three-pointers mattered because Philadelphia struggled from long range throughout the game.

Robinson’s 5-for-7 performance represented a 71.4% success rate from three-point range. Philadelphia, as a team, made only 8 of 35 attempts from beyond the arc.

That contrast demonstrates how much perimeter efficiency influenced the final result.

Cade Cunningham’s Playmaking Stood Out

Cade Cunningham did not have a huge scoring night, finishing with only 8 points, but his overall impact was significant.

His statistical line included:

• 8 points
• 5 rebounds
• 13 assists
• 2 steals
• 1 block
• 3-for-6 field goals
• 2-for-2 free throws
• +27 plus/minus

The 13 assists are particularly important.

Detroit recorded 37 assists as a team, meaning Cunningham was directly responsible for a substantial portion of the team’s successful offensive possessions.

His +27 plus/minus was also the best mark among the players listed in the box score.

This is a useful reminder when evaluating player statistics. A player’s offensive value cannot always be measured by points alone. Cunningham’s contribution came primarily through creating scoring opportunities for teammates.

Jalen Duren Delivered a Double-Double

Jalen Duren recorded one of Detroit’s most complete performances.

He finished with 14 points and 10 rebounds, producing a double-double while shooting 6-for-7 from the field.

His complete line was:

• 14 points
• 10 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 1 block
• 6-for-7 field goals
• 2-for-3 free throws
• +21 plus/minus

Duren’s rebounding helped Detroit win the overall rebounding battle 40-35.

More importantly, Detroit collected 30 defensive rebounds compared with Philadelphia’s 24. That limited Philadelphia’s second-chance opportunities and helped Detroit finish defensive possessions.

Tobias Harris Provided Efficient Scoring

Tobias Harris scored 15 points for Detroit and shot efficiently.

He finished 6-for-11 from the field, made 2 of 3 three-point attempts, and converted his only free-throw attempt.

His statistical contribution included:

• 15 points
• 5 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 1 steal
• 6-for-11 field goals
• 2-for-3 three-pointers
• 1-for-1 free throws
• +18 plus/minus

Harris was one of several Detroit starters who finished with a positive plus/minus of at least 18.

That consistency across the starting lineup is significant. Detroit did not need one player to produce an extraordinary scoring total because the entire group contributed efficiently.

Detroit’s Bench Added Significant Production

One of the clearest advantages for Detroit was its depth.

Javonte Green scored 17 points from the bench and delivered one of the most efficient perimeter performances of the night. He shot 5-for-8 from the field, made 4 of 6 three-pointers, and converted all three free throws.

Ronald Holland II scored 15 points while making all seven of his free throws.

Isaiah Stewart contributed 13 points on 5-for-5 shooting.

Kevin Huerter added 12 points, four rebounds, four assists, and two steals.

Paul Reed contributed 6 points, two rebounds, one assist, and two blocks.

Daniss Jenkins added 6 points, two rebounds, three assists, and one block.

The combined production gave Detroit a balanced attack that Philadelphia struggled to contain.

Philadelphia 76ers Player Performance

Philadelphia’s individual statistics show that the team had several productive players despite losing by 22 points.

MarJon Beauchamp led the 76ers with 17 points. He shot 7-for-13 from the field and added six rebounds, two assists, and one block.

Jabari Walker was arguably Philadelphia’s most efficient scorer. He scored 16 points while shooting a perfect 6-for-6 from the field, 2-for-2 from three-point range, and 2-for-2 at the free-throw line.

Cameron Payne contributed 15 points, two assists, and one rebound.

Among the starters, Quentin Grimes led Philadelphia with 14 points. Justin Edwards contributed 12 points, nine rebounds, five assists, and four steals.

The issue was not that Philadelphia lacked individual production. The larger problem was that the team’s overall efficiency and offensive coordination did not match Detroit.

Justin Edwards Had an All-Around Contribution

Justin Edwards produced one of Philadelphia’s most complete stat lines.

He recorded:

• 12 points
• 9 rebounds
• 5 assists
• 4 steals
• 5-for-11 field goals
• 0-for-2 three-pointers
• 2-for-4 free throws
• -5 plus/minus

The four steals were especially notable.

Edwards also came close to a double-double and contributed five assists. His performance demonstrates that Philadelphia had players capable of influencing the game in several statistical categories.

However, the overall team result shows that these individual contributions were not enough to overcome Detroit’s offensive efficiency.

Quentin Grimes Struggled From Three

Quentin Grimes scored 14 points, but his perimeter shooting was inefficient.

He finished 5-for-14 from the field and only 1-for-8 from three-point range.

That meant he made just 12.5% of his three-point attempts.

For comparison, Detroit’s team three-point percentage was 40%.

This is one of the clearest statistical contrasts in the game. Philadelphia attempted the same number of three-pointers as Detroit, 35 each, but Detroit converted six additional shots.

Six extra three-pointers represent 18 additional points before considering any other scoring difference.

VJ Edgecombe’s Offensive Difficulty

VJ Edgecombe finished with 10 points, five rebounds, and two blocks.

However, he shot 3-for-14 from the field and 0-for-5 from three-point range.

His four-for-four free-throw shooting helped his scoring total, but his overall shooting efficiency remained a challenge.

The statistical contrast becomes clear when comparing Edgecombe’s 21.4% field-goal shooting with Detroit’s 54% team field-goal percentage.

This was not the only reason Philadelphia lost, but inefficient shooting from several players made it difficult for the 76ers to keep pace with Detroit.

Philadelphia’s Bench Provided a Bright Spot

Despite the loss, Philadelphia’s bench produced several useful performances.

MarJon Beauchamp scored 17 points.

Jabari Walker scored 16 points while shooting perfectly from the field.

Cameron Payne scored 15 points.

Dalen Terry added 8 points, three rebounds, two assists, and two blocks.

Tyrese Martin contributed 2 points, one rebound, one assist, and two steals.

The bench production prevented the game from becoming an even larger blowout.

Jabari Walker’s performance deserves particular attention because he made all six of his field-goal attempts and both of his three-point attempts.

That level of efficiency was one of the few areas where Philadelphia clearly outperformed expectations within its rotation.

Andre Drummond’s Absence

Andre Drummond did not play because of back spasms.

His absence is important when examining Philadelphia’s frontcourt statistics.

The 76ers finished with 35 total rebounds, compared with Detroit’s 40. Detroit also secured 30 defensive rebounds compared with Philadelphia’s 24.

While a single absence cannot automatically explain a 22-point defeat, it is relevant context when evaluating the team’s available interior rotation.

A proper box-score analysis should distinguish between what happened statistically and what might have happened under different circumstances. The available data confirms that Drummond did not play, but it does not establish that his presence would have changed the final result.

Ball Movement Created Detroit’s Offensive Advantage

Perhaps the most revealing statistic in this game was assists.

Detroit finished with 37 assists.

Philadelphia finished with 20.

That is a 17-assist difference.

Detroit made 48 field goals and recorded 37 assists. This indicates that much of the team’s scoring came through assisted baskets and coordinated offensive execution.

Philadelphia made 42 field goals but recorded only 20 assists.

This difference suggests that Detroit generated a more connected offensive performance.

It also helps explain why Detroit was able to maintain high shooting efficiency without depending on one dominant individual scorer.

Rebounding Battle

Detroit won the rebounding battle 40-35.

The difference was not enormous in total rebounds, but the distribution mattered.

Detroit collected 30 defensive rebounds compared with Philadelphia’s 24.

Philadelphia had 11 offensive rebounds, while Detroit had 10.

That means Philadelphia did a respectable job creating second-chance opportunities, but Detroit was more effective at securing defensive possessions after missed shots.

The five-rebound overall advantage was therefore less important than the 30-24 defensive rebounding difference.

Three-Point Shooting Comparison

Three-point shooting was one of the biggest statistical separators.

Both teams attempted 35 shots from beyond the arc.

Detroit made 14.

Philadelphia made 8.

Team	3PT Made	3PT Attempts	Percentage
Detroit	14	35	40%
Philadelphia	8	35	23%

The six additional made threes gave Detroit an 18-point advantage in made three-point baskets.

This is a particularly useful statistic for readers trying to understand how the game developed.

Philadelphia did not simply lose because Detroit attempted more threes. Both teams attempted exactly 35.

Detroit won because it converted those opportunities at a significantly higher rate.

Free-Throw Efficiency

Detroit was also nearly perfect from the free-throw line.

The Pistons converted 21 of 22 attempts, good for 95%.

Philadelphia made 17 of 24 attempts, or 71%.

The difference was four made free throws despite Philadelphia attempting two more shots.

Detroit’s 21 made free throws contributed to the team’s 131-point total and demonstrated strong execution when opportunities came at the line.

Turnovers and Possession Quality

Philadelphia committed 15 turnovers.

Detroit committed 17.

On the surface, this category favored Philadelphia slightly.

However, the turnover advantage was not enough to offset Detroit’s shooting and passing superiority.

Detroit had more turnovers but still produced 22 more points.

That is an important analytical point. Turnover totals should not be evaluated in isolation. A team can survive a small turnover disadvantage if it gains substantially more value through shooting efficiency, rebounding, and offensive creation.

Detroit’s 54% field-goal shooting and 40% three-point shooting more than compensated for its two additional turnovers.

Defensive Statistics

Philadelphia recorded 10 steals and 8 blocks.

Detroit recorded 10 steals and 7 blocks.

Philadelphia therefore had a slight advantage in blocks while the teams were tied in steals.

Those defensive statistics show that the 76ers were not completely passive defensively.

However, Detroit’s offensive efficiency made those defensive plays less influential on the final result.

The Pistons continued to generate scoring opportunities even while Philadelphia produced 18 combined steals and blocks.

Plus/Minus Leaders

Plus/minus provides additional context about how the game unfolded while players were on the court.

Detroit’s strongest plus/minus figures included:

• Cade Cunningham: +27
• Marcus Sasser: +23
• Jalen Duren: +21
• Javonte Green: +20
• Tobias Harris: +18
• Duncan Robinson: +18

Philadelphia’s best listed plus/minus figures included:

• Tyrese Martin: +2
• Dalen Terry: +1
• MarJon Beauchamp: -1
• Justin Edwards: -5
• Jabari Walker: -5

It is important not to treat plus/minus as a standalone measure of player quality. It is influenced by teammates, opponents, lineups, and game circumstances.

Still, the concentration of strong positive numbers across Detroit’s rotation supports the broader conclusion that the Pistons played effectively as a unit.

What the Box Score Says About Detroit

The statistics point toward three major strengths.

1. Efficient Shooting

Detroit made 54% of its field-goal attempts and 40% from three.

2. Elite Ball Movement

The Pistons recorded 37 assists, 17 more than Philadelphia.

3. Balanced Contributions

Detroit received meaningful scoring from both starters and reserves.

The team had five starters who contributed between 6 and 19 points, while several bench players scored in double figures.

That balance made Detroit difficult to defend because Philadelphia could not focus its defensive attention on one scoring option.

What the Box Score Says About Philadelphia

Philadelphia’s statistics tell a different story.

The 76ers had multiple individual contributors, but the team’s shooting efficiency was inconsistent.

The biggest concerns were:

• 47% overall field-goal shooting compared with Detroit’s 54%
• 23% three-point shooting compared with Detroit’s 40%
• 20 assists compared with Detroit’s 37
• 35 rebounds compared with Detroit’s 40
• 71% free-throw shooting compared with Detroit’s 95%

Philadelphia also had several inefficient perimeter performances.

Quentin Grimes went 1-for-8 from three, while VJ Edgecombe went 0-for-5 from long range.

When a team attempts 35 threes but makes only eight, the offensive margin for error becomes very small.

Most Important Player Performances

When assessing the detroit pistons vs 76ers match player stats, several performances stand above the rest.

Cade Cunningham

Cunningham’s 13 assists were arguably more important than his 8 points. His +27 plus/minus was also the strongest listed figure in the game.

Duncan Robinson

Robinson scored 19 points and made five three-pointers on seven attempts. His perimeter efficiency directly contributed to Detroit’s 40% team three-point shooting.

Jalen Duren

Duren recorded a double-double with 14 points and 10 rebounds while shooting 6-for-7.

Javonte Green

Green scored 17 points from the bench and made four of six three-point attempts.

MarJon Beauchamp

Beauchamp led Philadelphia with 17 points and added six rebounds.

Jabari Walker

Walker delivered one of Philadelphia’s most efficient performances, going 6-for-6 from the field and 2-for-2 from three.

Why Detroit Won by 22 Points

The final margin becomes easier to understand when the major statistical categories are combined.

Detroit scored 22 more points.

The Pistons shot seven percentage points better from the field.

They made six more three-pointers despite taking the same number of attempts.

They recorded 17 more assists.

They collected five more rebounds.

They converted 21 of 22 free throws.

Philadelphia had fewer turnovers, but that advantage was relatively small compared with Detroit’s superiority in shooting and playmaking.

The third quarter was also decisive. Detroit outscored Philadelphia 35-21 after the teams had been tied at 33 points in the second quarter.

That 14-point third-quarter advantage created the foundation for the final 22-point margin.

Key Numbers at a Glance

Statistic	Philadelphia	Detroit	Advantage
Final Score	109	131	Detroit
FG%	47%	54%	Detroit
3PT%	23%	40%	Detroit
FT%	71%	95%	Detroit
Rebounds	35	40	Detroit
Assists	20	37	Detroit
Turnovers	15	17	Philadelphia
Steals	10	10	Even
Blocks	8	7	Philadelphia

The table shows that Detroit won most of the categories that directly supported offensive efficiency.

How to Read These Player Stats Properly

A box score can answer many questions, but it should not be treated as the entire story.

Points show scoring output.

Field-goal percentage shows shooting efficiency.

Three-point percentage reveals perimeter conversion.

Rebounds indicate possession control and second-chance opportunities.

Assists help explain offensive creation.

Steals and blocks provide a snapshot of defensive playmaking.

Plus/minus gives some indication of team performance while a player was on the court.

The most reliable analysis comes from looking at these statistics together rather than focusing on one number.

For example, Cade Cunningham’s 8 points may appear modest compared with players who scored 17 or 19. But his 13 assists and +27 plus/minus demonstrate that his influence extended far beyond scoring.

Likewise, Jabari Walker’s 16 points look impressive, but his perfect 6-for-6 shooting provides additional context about the efficiency behind those points.

Season-Series Significance

Detroit entered this game with a strong 47-18 record, including a 25-8 home record.

Philadelphia entered at 35-31, with a 17-15 road record.

After this matchup, Detroit had won all three meetings in the season series.

A 3-0 season-series record does not automatically predict future playoff outcomes, but it is useful historical context when evaluating how the teams matched up during the regular season.

The March 13 result was particularly convincing because Detroit won by 22 points while controlling several major statistical categories.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the Pistons and 76ers?

The Detroit Pistons defeated the Philadelphia 76ers 131-109 on March 13, 2026, at Little Caesars Arena.

Who led the Pistons in scoring?

Duncan Robinson led Detroit’s starters with 19 points. Javonte Green also scored 17 points off the bench.

Who led the 76ers in scoring?

MarJon Beauchamp led Philadelphia with 17 points. Jabari Walker scored 16 points, while Cameron Payne added 15.

How many assists did Cade Cunningham have?

Cade Cunningham recorded 13 assists along with 8 points, 5 rebounds, 2 steals, and 1 block.

Who recorded a double-double for Detroit?

Jalen Duren recorded a double-double with 14 points and 10 rebounds.

Why did Detroit beat Philadelphia?

Detroit’s victory was driven by superior shooting efficiency, three-point accuracy, ball movement, rebounding, and free-throw shooting. The Pistons shot 54% from the field and 40% from three compared with Philadelphia’s 47% and 23%.

Conclusion

The detroit pistons vs 76ers match player stats from March 13, 2026, show a Detroit team that won through efficiency and collective execution rather than relying on one dominant scorer.

The Pistons finished with 131 points, shot 54% from the field, made 14 three-pointers, and recorded 37 assists. Cade Cunningham’s 13 assists highlighted Detroit’s playmaking, while Duncan Robinson’s five three-pointers and Jalen Duren’s double-double added major value.

Philadelphia still received useful performances from MarJon Beauchamp, Jabari Walker, Cameron Payne, Justin Edwards, and others. Walker’s perfect shooting night was especially notable. However, the 76ers could not overcome their 23% three-point shooting and the substantial 37-20 disadvantage in assists.

The third quarter ultimately became the turning point. Detroit’s 35-21 advantage after halftime expanded the lead and put the game firmly under the Pistons’ control.

From a statistical perspective, the result was consistent with Detroit’s stronger shooting, passing, and rebounding numbers. The 131-109 final score therefore reflects more than a simple scoring difference. It represents a game in which Detroit consistently generated better offensive results across several key areas.