Miami dolphins vs Cleveland browns match player stats

The Miami Dolphins vs. Cleveland Browns match player stats from October 19, 2025, tell a much clearer story than the final score alone. Cleveland defeated Miami 31-6, but the box score shows that the game was decided by several connected factors: turnovers, red-zone execution, Cleveland’s rushing touchdowns, and a major difference in quarterback efficiency. Miami finished with 100 passing yards from Tua Tagovailoa, while Cleveland quarterback Dillon Gabriel produced 116 passing yards without throwing an interception. The Browns also intercepted Tagovailoa three times and returned one of those interceptions for a touchdown.

For anyone reviewing this matchup from a statistical perspective, the numbers reveal why Cleveland controlled the game despite the relatively modest passing totals on both sides. The Browns did not need a high-volume passing attack. Instead, they combined efficient quarterback play with 104 team rushing yards and three rushing touchdowns. Miami managed 99 rushing yards but struggled to turn its offensive possessions into points.

The result was Cleveland’s second win of the season, moving the Browns to 2-5 overall and 2-2 at home. Miami dropped to 1-6 overall and 0-4 on the road.

Miami Dolphins vs. Cleveland Browns Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The final score was:

Team	Final Score	Record After Game
Cleveland Browns	31	2-5
Miami Dolphins	6	1-6

The game was played on October 19, 2025.

At first glance, a 25-point margin might suggest that Cleveland dominated every statistical category. That was not exactly the case. Miami actually averaged more yards per rushing attempt than Cleveland, with 4.5 yards per carry compared with 3.2 for the Browns.

The difference came from how each team converted its opportunities.

Miami had 17 receptions for 153 yards, while Cleveland recorded 13 receptions for 116 yards. Yet Cleveland scored five times, including three rushing touchdowns, while Miami managed only two successful field goals.

That contrast is important. Raw yardage does not always explain the outcome of an NFL game. Turnovers, scoring efficiency, field position and finishing drives can have a much larger impact.

Quarterback Performance

Tua Tagovailoa

Tua Tagovailoa’s numbers were among the most important statistics in the matchup.

He completed 12 of 23 passes for 100 yards, with no passing touchdowns and three interceptions.

Statistic	Tua Tagovailoa
Completions	12
Attempts	23
Completion Rate	52.2%
Passing Yards	100
Passing TDs	0
Interceptions	3

The three interceptions were particularly costly.

Miami’s offense completed only slightly more than half of its pass attempts and produced an average of roughly 4.3 yards per attempt. More importantly, the Dolphins failed to generate a passing touchdown while giving Cleveland three takeaways through interceptions.

This is one of the clearest areas where the box score explains the final result. A team can survive a low passing total when it protects the football. Miami did not have that advantage in this game.

Dillon Gabriel

Dillon Gabriel had a much more efficient statistical performance.

He completed 13 of 18 passes for 116 yards, with zero touchdowns and zero interceptions.

Statistic	Dillon Gabriel
Completions	13
Attempts	18
Completion Rate	72.2%
Passing Yards	116
Passing TDs	0
Interceptions	0

Gabriel’s passing numbers were not spectacular in terms of volume, but they were efficient.

His 72.2% completion rate was significantly higher than Tagovailoa’s 52.2%. Most importantly, Gabriel avoided the turnovers that hurt Miami.

Cleveland did not require Gabriel to throw for 250 or 300 yards. The Browns were able to complement his passing with their rushing attack and turn their possessions into points.

That is one of the most useful lessons from this box score: quarterback efficiency cannot be judged by passing yards alone.

Rushing Statistics

The rushing numbers provide another important layer of context.

Miami finished with 22 rushing attempts for 99 yards, averaging 4.5 yards per carry.

Cleveland had 33 rushing attempts for 104 yards, averaging 3.2 yards per carry.

Team	Attempts	Yards	Average
Miami Dolphins	22	99	4.5
Cleveland Browns	33	104	3.2

Interestingly, Miami had the better rushing average, but Cleveland had the much greater rushing workload.

The Browns ran the ball 11 more times than Miami. That allowed Cleveland to control more offensive possessions with a balanced approach and ultimately produce three rushing touchdowns.

De’Von Achane

De’Von Achane was Miami’s leading rusher.

He recorded 13 carries for 82 yards, averaging 6.3 yards per carry.

Statistic	De’Von Achane
Carries	13
Rushing Yards	82
Yards Per Carry	6.3

Achane’s 82 rushing yards accounted for a large portion of Miami’s total rushing production.

His 6.3-yard average was also significantly higher than Cleveland’s team rushing average. From an individual performance perspective, this was one of Miami’s strongest offensive numbers.

The problem was that Miami’s overall offensive production did not convert that rushing efficiency into touchdowns.

This distinction matters when evaluating player stats. A strong individual rushing performance does not automatically translate into a successful team offensive performance.

Quinshon Judkins

Quinshon Judkins was Cleveland’s leading rusher and one of the most important players in the game.

He carried the ball 25 times for 84 yards and scored three rushing touchdowns.

Statistic	Quinshon Judkins
Carries	25
Rushing Yards	84
Yards Per Carry	3.4
Rushing TDs	3

Judkins’ average of 3.4 yards per carry was not particularly explosive, especially compared with Achane’s 6.3-yard average.

However, the number that matters most is three touchdowns.

Judkins received 25 carries, more than half of Cleveland’s 33 rushing attempts. That workload gave the Browns a dependable way to finish scoring opportunities.

His performance is a strong example of why efficiency and production need to be considered together. A player does not need a huge yards-per-carry figure to have a major influence on the outcome if he consistently converts important possessions into touchdowns.

Receiving Leaders

Miami Dolphins Receiving

Miami finished with 17 receptions for 153 yards.

The team’s leading receiver by yardage was Dee Eskridge.

He recorded two receptions for 45 yards, averaging 22.5 yards per reception.

Statistic	Dee Eskridge
Receptions	2
Receiving Yards	45
Average	22.5 yards per reception

Eskridge’s 45 receiving yards represented a significant share of Miami’s total receiving production.

His 22.5-yard average also shows that Miami had the ability to create bigger plays through the air. The problem was consistency. Two receptions are not enough volume to carry an entire passing offense, particularly when the quarterback throws three interceptions.

Miami’s receiving production therefore looks more encouraging when viewed through individual efficiency than through overall offensive output.

Cleveland Browns Receiving

Harold Fannin Jr. led Cleveland in receiving.

He finished with four receptions for 36 yards.

Statistic	Harold Fannin Jr.
Receptions	4
Receiving Yards	36

Fannin Jr.’s production was modest compared with high-volume receiving performances seen in many NFL games. However, Cleveland did not need its passing game to dominate.

The Browns spread the offensive workload between their passing game and rushing attack. That balance helped reduce the pressure on Gabriel to produce large passing numbers.

Turnovers Were a Major Difference

The turnover statistics are arguably the most important part of the entire matchup.

Miami threw three interceptions, while Cleveland threw none.

Turnover Statistic	Miami	Cleveland
Interceptions Thrown	3	0
Fumbles	6	1
Fumbles Lost	1	0
Total Interceptions by Defense	0	3

Miami also recorded six team fumbles and lost one.

Cleveland had only one team fumble and did not lose it.

This created a substantial ball-security advantage for Cleveland.

Tyson Campbell’s Defensive Impact

Tyson Campbell recorded one interception for Cleveland and returned it 34 yards for a touchdown.

That was especially valuable because it transformed a defensive play into seven points.

An interception that ends an offensive drive is already important. An interception returned for a touchdown has an even greater effect because the defense itself creates the score.

Campbell’s play therefore represents one of the most significant individual defensive statistics from the matchup.

Defensive Comparison

The defensive numbers also show that Cleveland consistently created pressure and disrupted Miami’s offense.

Defensive Statistic	Miami	Cleveland
Total Tackles	58	61
Solo Tackles	42	37
Sacks	2	4
Interceptions	0	3

Cleveland recorded four sacks compared with Miami’s two.

The Browns also produced three interceptions.

That combination suggests that Cleveland’s defense affected Miami both before and during passing plays. The four sacks created negative plays, while the interceptions ended possessions entirely and produced additional scoring opportunities.

Miami’s defense did record two sacks, but it did not intercept Gabriel.

That difference in takeaway production was substantial.

Team Tackling Numbers

Cleveland recorded 61 total tackles, compared with Miami’s 58.

Miami had 42 solo tackles, while Cleveland recorded 37.

These numbers are relatively close, which is useful because they show that the 31-6 result was not simply a matter of one defense making dramatically more tackles.

Instead, Cleveland’s advantage came from the type and timing of its defensive plays.

Sacks and interceptions have a much more direct impact on possession and scoring than a simple tackle count.

This is why looking only at total tackles can be misleading when evaluating a defensive performance.

Special Teams Statistics

Special teams also contributed measurable field-position value.

Miami Kick Returns

Miami recorded six kick returns for 164 yards, averaging 27.3 yards per return.

Cleveland Kick Returns

Cleveland had two kick returns for 37 yards, averaging 18.5 yards per return.

Special Teams Statistic	Miami	Cleveland
Kick Returns	6	2
Kick Return Yards	164	37
Kick Return Average	27.3	18.5
Punt Returns	1	2
Punt Return Yards	11	7

Miami had the clear advantage in kick-return yardage.

However, that advantage did not translate into enough offensive scoring.

This is another reminder that individual statistical advantages can exist even in a game where a team loses by a wide margin.

Kicking Performance

Miami kicker Riley Patterson made both of his field-goal attempts.

He finished 2-for-2, with a long of 33 yards and six total points.

Cleveland kicker Andre Szmyt made his only field-goal attempt and converted all four extra-point attempts. He finished with seven points.

Kicker	Field Goals	Long	Extra Points	Points
Riley Patterson	2/2	33 yards	Not listed	6
Andre Szmyt	1/1	Not listed	4/4	7

Both kickers were perfect on their listed attempts.

The larger difference was that Cleveland scored touchdowns frequently enough to make extra points part of its scoring total, while Miami relied on field goals for all six of its points.

Punting Statistics

Miami punter Jake Bailey recorded four punts for 189 yards, averaging 47.3 yards per punt.

Cleveland punter Corey Bojorquez recorded six punts for 258 yards, averaging 43.0 yards per punt.

Punter	Punts	Total Yards	Average
Jake Bailey	4	189	47.3
Corey Bojorquez	6	258	43.0

Bailey had the higher average, while Bojorquez had more total punts.

The six punts by Cleveland show that the Browns did not score on every possession. Their victory came from making their successful possessions count, particularly through the rushing game and defensive takeaways.

Why Cleveland Won the Game

The final score becomes easier to understand when the statistics are combined.

1. Cleveland protected the football

The Browns threw zero interceptions and lost zero fumbles.

Miami threw three interceptions and lost one fumble.

That created a major possession advantage for Cleveland.

2. Cleveland converted rushing opportunities into touchdowns

Judkins scored three rushing touchdowns.

Miami’s leading rusher, Achane, gained 82 yards but did not produce a rushing touchdown according to the supplied game data.

This difference between yardage and scoring was crucial.

3. Cleveland’s defense generated four sacks and three interceptions

The Browns did not simply stop Miami. They created game-changing defensive plays.

Three interceptions ended Miami possessions and one became a defensive touchdown.

4. Gabriel played within the offensive structure

Gabriel completed 13 of 18 passes for 116 yards without throwing an interception.

He did not need to produce a massive passing performance because Cleveland’s running game and defense provided support.

5. Miami struggled to finish drives

Miami produced 99 rushing yards and 153 receiving yards, but the offense scored only six points.

That is perhaps the biggest statistical contradiction of the game.

The Dolphins generated some productive individual numbers, but they did not convert enough of those opportunities into touchdowns.

Miami Dolphins Offensive Takeaways

The Miami side of the box score contains both positives and warning signs.

Achane’s 82 rushing yards and 6.3-yard average were strong individual numbers. Eskridge’s 45 receiving yards on only two catches also demonstrated big-play ability.

The problem was the lack of overall offensive efficiency.

Miami produced:

• 100 passing yards
• 99 rushing yards
• 153 receiving yards
• Three interceptions thrown
• One fumble lost
• Six total points

The offense therefore had productive moments without sustained scoring success.

The three interceptions were particularly damaging because Miami’s passing game was already limited in yardage.

Cleveland Browns Offensive Takeaways

Cleveland’s offensive formula was straightforward and effective.

The Browns produced 116 passing yards and 104 rushing yards.

The passing game remained controlled, while the running game received significant volume.

Judkins’ 25 carries were central to that strategy.

The Browns also finished with three rushing touchdowns, which explains why their relatively low 3.2-yard team rushing average did not prevent them from scoring 31 points.

The lesson is important: a rushing attack can be effective because of volume, field position and touchdown conversion even when its average is not particularly high.

Comparing the Most Important Players

The most useful comparison is not simply which player gained the most yards. Instead, it is useful to examine production, efficiency and impact.

Player	Key Production	Major Impact
Tua Tagovailoa	100 passing yards, 3 INT	Turnovers hurt Miami
Dillon Gabriel	116 passing yards, 0 INT	Efficient and mistake-free
De’Von Achane	82 rushing yards, 6.3 average	Miami’s leading rusher
Quinshon Judkins	84 rushing yards, 3 TD	Three rushing scores
Dee Eskridge	45 receiving yards	Miami’s leading receiver by yards
Harold Fannin Jr.	36 receiving yards	Cleveland’s leading receiver
Tyson Campbell	1 INT, 34-yard TD return	Defensive touchdown

Judkins stands out because his production directly affected the scoreboard.

Campbell also deserves special attention because his interception return produced a defensive touchdown.

Gabriel’s value came from avoiding the mistakes that allowed Miami to remain in control of possessions.

What the Box Score Says About Efficiency

One of the most interesting aspects of this game is that Cleveland did not dominate every traditional yardage category.

Miami had the higher team rushing average.

Miami also had more receiving yards.

Miami’s kick return numbers were considerably better.

Yet Cleveland won 31-6.

That tells us that the quality of a statistical advantage matters more than simply accumulating yardage.

Consider the contrast:

Miami: 99 rushing yards, 153 receiving yards, 6 points.

Cleveland: 104 rushing yards, 116 receiving yards, 31 points.

Cleveland turned fewer total receiving yards into far more points.

The biggest explanation is the combination of turnovers and touchdowns.

A Closer Look at Scoring Efficiency

Miami’s six points came from two successful field goals.

Cleveland’s 31 points included three rushing touchdowns, a defensive touchdown and a successful field goal.

This is a dramatic difference in how the teams finished possessions.

Miami moved the ball enough to create some kicking opportunities, but it did not consistently reach the end zone.

Cleveland found multiple ways to score.

The Browns’ rushing attack generated three touchdowns, while Campbell’s interception return added another.

This made Cleveland less dependent on passing production.

What These Player Stats Mean for Future Analysis

A useful way to evaluate an NFL box score is to separate three categories:

Volume: How many opportunities did the player receive?

Efficiency: How well did the player perform with those opportunities?

Impact: Did the production change the game?

Judkins is a good example.

His 25 carries represent high volume. His 3.4 yards per carry indicate moderate efficiency. His three touchdowns demonstrate enormous scoring impact.

Achane presents a different profile.

His 13 carries represent less volume. His 6.3 yards per carry show excellent efficiency. But his production did not result in enough team scoring to change the game’s outcome.

This approach provides more useful analysis than simply ranking players by yardage.

Most Important Statistical Advantages

The major statistical advantages for Cleveland were:

1. Three interceptions compared with zero for Miami
2. Zero fumbles lost compared with one for Miami
3. Four sacks compared with two
4. Three rushing touchdowns
5. A 72.2% completion rate from Gabriel
6. A 25-carry workload for Judkins
7. A defensive touchdown from Tyson Campbell

Miami’s notable statistical advantages included:

1. 4.5 yards per rushing attempt
2. 99 team rushing yards
3. 153 receiving yards
4. 164 kick-return yards
5. Two successful field goals
6. 82 rushing yards from Achane

The contrast demonstrates why the final score cannot be explained by one statistic.

Miami Dolphins vs. Cleveland Browns Match Player Stats: Key Numbers at a Glance

For readers who want the most important numbers quickly, these are the statistics to remember:

• Final score: Cleveland 31, Miami 6
• Game date: October 19, 2025
• Miami record: 1-6
• Cleveland record: 2-5
• Tua Tagovailoa: 12/23, 100 yards, 0 TD, 3 INT
• Dillon Gabriel: 13/18, 116 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT
• De’Von Achane: 13 carries, 82 yards
• Quinshon Judkins: 25 carries, 84 yards, 3 TD
• Dee Eskridge: 2 receptions, 45 yards
• Harold Fannin Jr.: 4 receptions, 36 yards
• Tyson Campbell: 1 interception, 34-yard touchdown return
• Miami rushing: 22 carries, 99 yards
• Cleveland rushing: 33 carries, 104 yards
• Miami receiving: 17 receptions, 153 yards
• Cleveland receiving: 13 receptions, 116 yards
• Miami sacks: 2
• Cleveland sacks: 4
• Miami interceptions: 0
• Cleveland interceptions: 3

Understanding the Records After the Game

The result moved Miami to 1-6 overall and 0-4 away from home.

Cleveland improved to 2-5 overall and 2-2 at home.

The home and road records add useful context to the result.

Cleveland had now won half of its home games in the supplied record, while Miami remained winless in four road games.

These records should not be treated as proof that location alone caused the result. They are better understood as context surrounding the matchup.

Data Accuracy and How to Read the Box Score

When researching NFL player statistics, it is important to distinguish between team totals and individual leaders.

For example, Miami’s 99 rushing yards were produced by the entire rushing group, while Achane’s 82 yards represent his individual contribution.

Likewise, Cleveland’s 104 rushing yards were shared across its rushing attempts, while Judkins accounted for 84 yards.

The same principle applies to receiving statistics.

Team receiving totals represent the combined production of the passing offense, while the listed receiving leader represents only one player.

This distinction prevents a common mistake in sports-stat articles: treating a player’s individual numbers as if they were the team’s complete production.

The figures used throughout this article are based on the supplied ESPN box-score data for the October 19, 2025 matchup.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the Miami Dolphins and Cleveland Browns?

The Cleveland Browns defeated the Miami Dolphins 31-6 on October 19, 2025.

Who was the leading rusher in the game?

Quinshon Judkins led the Browns with 84 rushing yards on 25 carries and scored three rushing touchdowns. Miami’s leading rusher was De’Von Achane, who recorded 82 yards on 13 carries.

How did Tua Tagovailoa perform against the Browns?

Tagovailoa completed 12 of 23 passes for 100 yards. He threw no touchdowns and three interceptions.

How did Dillon Gabriel perform?

Dillon Gabriel completed 13 of 18 passes for 116 yards. He did not throw a touchdown or interception.

Who led the game in receiving?

Dee Eskridge led Miami in receiving yards with 45 on two receptions. Harold Fannin Jr. led Cleveland with four receptions for 36 yards.

Which team had more interceptions?

Cleveland had three interceptions, while Miami had none. Tyson Campbell returned one interception 34 yards for a touchdown.

Conclusion

The Miami Dolphins vs. Cleveland Browns match player stats show that Cleveland’s 31-6 victory was driven less by overwhelming yardage and more by efficiency, ball security and scoring plays.

Dillon Gabriel protected the football while completing 72.2% of his passes. Quinshon Judkins supplied 25 rushing attempts and scored three touchdowns. Cleveland’s defense added four sacks and three interceptions, including Tyson Campbell’s 34-yard interception return for a touchdown.

Miami had several individual positives. De’Von Achane averaged 6.3 yards per carry and finished with 82 rushing yards, while Dee Eskridge produced 45 receiving yards on only two catches. The Dolphins also averaged 4.5 yards per rushing attempt and generated 164 kick-return yards.

Those numbers, however, did not overcome the turnovers and lack of touchdowns.

Ultimately, this matchup is a strong example of why NFL statistics need context. Yardage can show how a team moved the ball, but turnovers, touchdown production and the timing of major plays often determine who actually wins the game.