Los Angeles Sparks vs Seattle Storm Match Player Stats

The los angeles sparks vs seattle storm match player stats from August 31, 2026, tell a much clearer story than the final score alone. The Los Angeles Sparks defeated the Seattle Storm 90-74 at Climate Pledge Arena in Seattle, using efficient shooting, strong perimeter scoring, and a standout all-around performance from Nneka Ogwumike. Seattle controlled the offensive rebounding battle and finished with 43 total rebounds, but struggled to convert its possessions efficiently, particularly from three-point range.

The 16-point result also completed a 2-1 season-series victory for Los Angeles. The Sparks had previously beaten Seattle 88-83 on June 11, while the Storm answered with an 82-64 win on July 7. The August 31 meeting therefore served as the deciding game of the three-game series.

For readers looking beyond the score, this game offers several useful statistical angles. Los Angeles shot 44% from the field and 39% from three, while Seattle managed 34% shooting overall and just 18% from deep. Nneka Ogwumike led all Los Angeles scorers with 23 points and added 12 rebounds, while Rae Burrell scored 22. Seattle received 19 points from Flau’jae Johnson and 17 from Dominique Malonga, who also collected 15 rebounds.

Game overview

The matchup was played on August 31, 2026, at Climate Pledge Arena in Seattle, Washington, in front of an attendance of 14,200.

Los Angeles won 90-74, improving to 15-25 overall and 8-12 on the road according to the provided game data. Seattle finished the game with an 8-32 record and a 6-14 home record.

The Sparks established control early. They opened the game with a 25-11 first quarter and then added 27 points in the second period. Seattle improved offensively after halftime, but the early deficit proved too large to erase.

Final score by quarter

Quarter	Los Angeles Sparks	Seattle Storm
1st	25	11
2nd	27	22
3rd	18	19
4th	20	22
Final	90	74

The first half was the biggest statistical separator. Los Angeles scored 52 points before halftime, while Seattle had 33. Seattle actually outscored the Sparks by one point over the second half, 41-40, but that improvement was not enough to overcome the 19-point halftime deficit.

That pattern is important when reviewing the los angeles sparks vs seattle storm match player stats. The game was not decided by a dominant fourth-quarter collapse. Los Angeles built its advantage much earlier and then managed it through the final two quarters.

los angeles sparks vs seattle storm match player stats

The individual numbers show that Los Angeles received significant contributions from several players rather than relying on a single scorer.

Nneka Ogwumike was the headline performer. She finished with 23 points on 9-of-17 shooting, including 4-of-7 from three-point range. She also grabbed 12 rebounds, distributed three assists, committed only one turnover, and recorded two steals.

Rae Burrell was almost as important offensively, scoring 22 points. She made 7 of 18 field-goal attempts and was perfect from the free-throw line at 8-for-8. Her combination of scoring volume and free-throw efficiency gave Los Angeles another reliable source of points.

Cameron Brink added 11 points and six rebounds, although her shooting efficiency was lower. She went 3-for-15 from the field and 1-for-6 from three, but made all four of her free throws and contributed two blocks.

Erica Wheeler provided an efficient supporting performance. She scored nine points on 3-of-4 shooting and made all three of her three-point attempts. She also recorded four assists, giving the Sparks another productive playmaking option.

Los Angeles Sparks player statistics

Player	PTS	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	TO	STL	BLK
Nneka Ogwumike	23	9-17	4-7	1-1	12	3	1	2	0
Rae Burrell	22	7-18	0-0	8-8	4	3	4	1	0
Cameron Brink	11	3-15	1-6	4-4	6	2	4	1	2
Erica Wheeler	9	3-4	3-4	0-0	0	4	0	1	1
Chance Gray	6	2-3	2-3	0-0	0	1	0	1	0
Monique Akoa Makani	6	2-3	2-3	0-0	3	2	3	0	1
Tonie Morgan	3	1-2	0-0	1-2	2	4	2	1	0
Ariel Atkins	4	2-4	0-0	0-0	2	2	0	1	1
Dearica Hamby	6	3-7	0-0	0-0	11	2	2	4	0

One of the most interesting numbers belongs to Dearica Hamby. She scored only six points, but her 11 rebounds and four steals show why a traditional points-only view can miss part of a player’s contribution.

Her four steals were the highest total among the listed Los Angeles players. Combined with 11 rebounds, her statistical profile was heavily weighted toward possessions and defensive disruption rather than scoring.

Ogwumike, meanwhile, combined scoring efficiency with rebounding. Her 9-for-17 shooting translated to approximately 53% from the field, while her four made three-pointers provided an important spacing advantage.

Seattle Storm player statistics

Seattle’s leading scorer was Dominique Malonga, who recorded 17 points and 15 rebounds. She shot 8-for-21 from the field and made her only free-throw attempt.

Flau’jae Johnson was close behind with 19 points. She shot 7-for-18 from the field, made one of four three-point attempts, and converted all four of her free throws. Her five turnovers were a notable part of her statistical line, especially in a game where Seattle needed efficient possessions.

Zia Cooke added 14 points on 6-for-17 shooting. She also recorded four rebounds, two assists, three steals, and one block.

Ezi Magbegor contributed nine points, five rebounds, three steals, and one block. Her three steals tied the highest Seattle total among the players listed, while her defensive activity helped create additional opportunities even though the Storm could not translate enough possessions into efficient scoring.

Seattle Storm player statistics

Player	PTS	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	TO	STL	BLK
Dominique Malonga	17	8-21	0-0	1-1	15	3	1	0	2
Flau’jae Johnson	19	7-18	1-4	4-4	3	2	5	1	0
Zia Cooke	14	6-17	1-4	1-3	4	2	3	3	1
Ezi Magbegor	9	3-8	1-2	2-2	5	1	2	3	1
Jade Melbourne	5	1-6	1-3	2-2	1	3	1	1	0
Jordan Horston	3	1-4	0-0	1-2	4	1	2	2	0
Katie Lou Samuelson	4	1-4	0-0	2-2	0	2	0	1	0
Mackenzie Holmes	3	1-2	0-0	1-2	2	0	1	0	0
Taylor Thierry	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	0
Stefanie Dolson	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	5	3	0	0	0

The most striking Seattle performance came from Malonga’s rebounding. Her 15 boards were three more than Ogwumike’s 12 and represented a major individual contribution despite the Storm’s overall loss.

Taylor Thierry also deserves attention when looking beyond points. She scored zero points but collected four rebounds, including three offensive rebounds, and finished with a listed plus-minus of +15. Stefanie Dolson likewise scored zero points but recorded five rebounds and three assists with a listed plus-minus of +12.

These numbers demonstrate why box-score analysis should not treat zero-point performances as automatically unproductive. Rebounding, passing, defensive possessions, screens, positioning, and second-chance opportunities can all influence a game without appearing prominently in the scoring column.

Shooting efficiency decided the matchup

The biggest team-level difference was shooting.

Los Angeles made 32 of 73 field-goal attempts, a 44% shooting rate. Seattle made 28 of 82 attempts, finishing at 34%.

That represents a nine-percentage-point difference in field-goal percentage.

The three-point gap was even more significant.

Los Angeles converted 12 of 31 three-point attempts, or 39%. Seattle made only four of 22, or 18%.

That difference produced 36 points from three-point field goals for Los Angeles compared with 12 for Seattle. The Sparks therefore generated 24 more points from beyond the arc.

The free-throw numbers were also efficient on both sides. Los Angeles went 14-for-15, or 93%, while Seattle went 14-for-18, or 78%.

This combination created a major scoring advantage for the Sparks. Los Angeles did not simply take more shots. The team converted its attempts at a substantially higher rate, especially from outside.

The shooting comparison

Category	Los Angeles	Seattle
Field goals	32-73	28-82
FG percentage	44%	34%
3-pointers	12-31	4-22
3PT percentage	39%	18%
Free throws	14-15	14-18
FT percentage	93%	78%

The contrast is particularly useful for anyone studying the los angeles sparks vs seattle storm match player stats from an analytical perspective.

Seattle attempted nine more field goals than Los Angeles, but still scored 16 fewer points. That is a clear illustration of how possession volume does not automatically translate into offensive production.

Rebounding told a different story

If the game had been decided by total rebounding alone, Seattle would have had a strong statistical case.

The Storm grabbed 43 rebounds compared with 40 for Los Angeles. More importantly, Seattle dominated the offensive glass with 14 offensive rebounds against only five for the Sparks.

That gave Seattle additional opportunities after missed shots.

Seattle also collected 29 defensive rebounds, while Los Angeles recorded 35 defensive rebounds.

The contrast between offensive and defensive rebounding is useful because it shows two different strengths within the same box score.

Seattle was aggressive around its own basket and generated 14 offensive rebounds. Los Angeles, however, did a better job securing defensive rebounds, limiting the number of second chances that could follow Seattle’s missed shots.

Dominique Malonga was central to Seattle’s rebounding effort with 15 boards. Los Angeles had a strong response through Ogwumike’s 12 and Hamby’s 11.

Between those three players alone, 38 rebounds were recorded.

Assists, turnovers, and ball security

Los Angeles finished with 23 assists, while Seattle had 17.

That six-assist advantage suggests that the Sparks generated more scoring opportunities through collective ball movement.

Turnovers were identical at 16 apiece.

This is an important detail because the final score was not created by a dramatic turnover differential. Both teams gave the ball away 16 times.

Instead, Los Angeles gained its advantage primarily through shot-making and offensive efficiency.

The individual assist numbers reinforce that point.

Wheeler recorded four assists, while Morgan also finished with four. Ogwumike and Burrell each added three.

Seattle had three assists from Malonga and Melbourne, while several other players contributed two.

The teams therefore had similar turnover totals, but Los Angeles created more assists and converted its shooting opportunities at a higher rate.

Defensive statistics

The Sparks recorded 12 steals and five blocks.

Seattle had 11 steals and four blocks.

Again, the difference was relatively small.

Hamby led Los Angeles with four steals. Ogwumike added two, while several teammates contributed one each.

For Seattle, Magbegor and Cooke each recorded three steals. Horston added two.

The block numbers were led by Brink for Los Angeles with two and Malonga for Seattle with two. Several other players added one block.

The defensive box score therefore does not suggest that one team completely overwhelmed the other defensively. The more meaningful distinction came from what happened after defensive possessions, particularly the ability to turn opportunities into efficient offense.

Nneka Ogwumike’s complete performance

Ogwumike’s 23-point performance deserves a closer look because her value was not limited to scoring.

Her final line was:

• 23 points
• 9-of-17 field goals
• 4-of-7 three-pointers
• 1-of-1 free throws
• 12 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 1 turnover
• 2 steals

The four made three-pointers are particularly notable. A 4-for-7 performance from outside meant Ogwumike was providing scoring from multiple areas of the floor.

She also maintained strong ball security, committing just one turnover while contributing three assists.

Her 12 rebounds completed a double-double and helped Los Angeles compete against a Seattle team that ultimately won the overall rebounding battle.

This type of statistical line is useful because it combines scoring efficiency, rebounding, passing, and defensive activity.

Rae Burrell’s scoring impact

Burrell finished with 22 points, just one point behind Ogwumike.

Her most efficient area was the free-throw line. She made all eight attempts.

Her field-goal line was 7-for-18, which means her overall scoring efficiency was lower than Ogwumike’s, but the perfect free-throw performance helped raise her total.

Burrell also recorded four rebounds, three assists, one steal, and four turnovers.

The four turnovers are worth mentioning because they represent a counterpoint to her scoring output. A complete player evaluation should account for both production and mistakes.

Even so, the Sparks needed a second major scorer alongside Ogwumike, and Burrell supplied that production with 22 points.

Cameron Brink’s mixed statistical profile

Brink’s 11 points came with a difficult shooting line.

She made three of 15 field-goal attempts and one of six from three-point range. That works out to 20% shooting from the field and approximately 17% from three.

However, her complete line included six rebounds, two assists, one steal, four free throws made on four attempts, and two blocks.

That creates a more nuanced statistical picture.

Her shot-making was inefficient, but she still contributed in several other categories. The two blocks were particularly useful from a defensive standpoint.

This is why individual player statistics should be read as a collection of indicators rather than a single number.

Seattle’s offensive challenges

Seattle’s 74 points came despite taking 82 field-goal attempts and collecting 14 offensive rebounds.

The central issue was conversion.

The Storm shot 34% from the field and 18% from three. Those numbers made it difficult to capitalize on the extra possessions created by offensive rebounding.

Seattle’s 14 offensive rebounds were valuable because they generated additional chances, but second opportunities only become points when the subsequent shots are converted.

The three-point issue was especially clear. Seattle made four of 22 attempts.

By comparison, Los Angeles made 12 of 31.

That 24-point difference from three-point makes was greater than the final 16-point margin.

Season series: Los Angeles wins 2-1

The three-game season series produced different types of games.

Game 1

Los Angeles Sparks 88, Seattle Storm 83

Date: June 11

Los Angeles opened the series with a five-point victory.

Game 2

Seattle Storm 82, Los Angeles Sparks 64

Date: July 7

Seattle responded with an 18-point victory, producing the largest margin in the season series before the final meeting.

Game 3

Los Angeles Sparks 90, Seattle Storm 74

Date: August 31

The Sparks closed the season series with a 16-point victory.

The combined results show a competitive series in terms of individual game outcomes, with each team recording a victory before Los Angeles took the deciding meeting.

Across the three games, Los Angeles finished with a 2-1 season-series record.

What the numbers reveal beyond the final score

One of the most useful lessons from this game is that the final score can hide contrasting team strengths.

Seattle won the rebounding battle 43-40.

Seattle also collected 14 offensive rebounds compared with five for Los Angeles.

Yet the Sparks won comfortably.

The reason becomes clearer when shooting efficiency is considered.

Los Angeles shot 44% overall and 39% from three.

Seattle shot 34% overall and 18% from three.

Both teams committed 16 turnovers.

Los Angeles also finished with more assists, 23-17.

So the statistical profile can be summarized as follows:

1. Seattle generated extra possessions through offensive rebounding.
2. Los Angeles converted its scoring opportunities more efficiently.
3. Los Angeles created more assists.
4. Both teams committed the same number of turnovers.
5. The largest shooting difference came from three-point accuracy.
6. Los Angeles built its decisive advantage before halftime.

That combination explains why Seattle’s rebounding edge did not translate into a victory.

A closer look at the first half

The first half was arguably the most important portion of the game.

Los Angeles scored 25 points in the opening quarter while holding Seattle to 11.

The Sparks then added 27 points in the second quarter.

Seattle improved from 11 points in the first to 22 in the second, but Los Angeles still won the period 27-22.

At halftime, Los Angeles had scored 52 points and Seattle had scored 33.

That 19-point difference established the basic shape of the contest.

After halftime, Seattle was competitive.

The Storm scored 19 points in the third quarter against Los Angeles’ 18.

Seattle then won the fourth quarter 22-20.

The second-half numbers therefore show that Seattle did not stop competing after the early deficit. The problem was that the first-half margin had already created too much ground to recover.

Why the box score matters for player analysis

A player-stat article should do more than list points.

Points identify scoring output, but other categories explain how that output was created and what else happened during the game.

For example, Ogwumike’s 23 points become more meaningful when paired with 12 rebounds, three assists, one turnover, and two steals.

Malonga’s 17 points become more notable when paired with 15 rebounds and two blocks.

Hamby’s six points look modest until her 11 rebounds and four steals are included.

Thierry’s zero points appear different when four rebounds, three offensive rebounds, and a listed +15 plus-minus are considered.

Dolson’s zero points also came with five rebounds and three assists.

This is the kind of context that makes raw box-score data more useful for readers who are trying to understand the actual flow of a game.

What readers should watch in similar matchups

When analyzing future games between these teams, several statistical categories provide useful context.

Three-point shooting

The August 31 game demonstrated how strongly perimeter efficiency can influence the result.

Los Angeles made 12 threes.

Seattle made four.

A future matchup with a much smaller gap from three could look very different.

Offensive rebounding

Seattle’s 14 offensive rebounds were one of the strongest parts of its statistical performance.

That area can create extra possessions even when initial shooting efficiency is poor.

Turnovers

Both teams had 16 turnovers in this matchup.

Because the turnover totals were equal, they did not explain the final margin. In another game, however, a significant turnover difference could quickly alter the possession balance.

Free-throw efficiency

Los Angeles converted 93% of its free throws.

Seattle converted 78%.

The difference was smaller than the three-point gap, but free throws still provided another source of efficient scoring for the Sparks.

First-quarter performance

Los Angeles won the opening quarter 25-11.

An early scoring gap can change the strategic nature of the rest of a game, particularly when the trailing team has to increase offensive volume.

How to read the player statistics correctly

There are several common mistakes when interpreting a box score.

First, points should not be considered in isolation.

Second, field-goal percentage should be considered alongside shot volume. A player taking 18 shots faces a different statistical context from someone taking three.

Third, three-point shooting can dramatically influence overall efficiency because each made three is worth more than a two-point field goal.

Fourth, rebounds should be separated into offensive and defensive categories when possible.

Fifth, turnovers should be considered alongside assists and usage rather than treated as an isolated negative.

Finally, defensive statistics such as steals and blocks can be useful indicators, but they do not capture every defensive contribution.

The August 31 matchup provides examples of all these principles.

The bigger statistical picture

The los angeles sparks vs seattle storm match player stats show a game in which Los Angeles won through efficiency while Seattle created opportunities through rebounding.

That distinction matters.

Seattle’s 43 rebounds compared with 40 for Los Angeles show that the Storm was capable of winning an important possession-related category.

But Los Angeles’ 44% shooting compared with Seattle’s 34% shooting was more consequential.

The three-point numbers made the difference even clearer.

Los Angeles converted 39% from deep.

Seattle converted 18%.

At the same time, the Sparks recorded 23 assists compared with 17 for Seattle.

Those three areas, shooting percentage, three-point efficiency, and assists, provide a strong statistical explanation for the final 90-74 score.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who led the Sparks in scoring against the Storm?

Nneka Ogwumike led Los Angeles with 23 points. She shot 9-of-17 from the field, made four three-pointers, and added 12 rebounds, three assists, and two steals.

Who was Seattle’s top scorer?

Flau’jae Johnson scored 19 points for Seattle, while Dominique Malonga added 17. Malonga also collected 15 rebounds and two blocks.

What was the final score of the game?

The Los Angeles Sparks defeated the Seattle Storm 90-74 on August 31, 2026, at Climate Pledge Arena.

Which team shot better from three-point range?

Los Angeles shot 39% from three, making 12 of 31 attempts. Seattle shot 18%, making four of 22 attempts.

Did Seattle win the rebounding battle?

Yes. Seattle recorded 43 total rebounds compared with 40 for Los Angeles. The Storm also had a 14-5 advantage in offensive rebounds.

Who won the 2026 season series?

According to the supplied game data, Los Angeles won the season series 2-1. The Sparks won on June 11 and August 31, while Seattle won on July 7.

Conclusion

The August 31 meeting between the Los Angeles Sparks and Seattle Storm was defined by a contrast between opportunity creation and shooting efficiency.

Seattle finished with more total rebounds, including a significant advantage on the offensive glass. Dominique Malonga’s 15 rebounds were especially important, while several Seattle players contributed on the defensive end.

Los Angeles, however, converted its opportunities at a much higher rate. The Sparks shot 44% overall and 39% from three, compared with Seattle’s 34% overall shooting and 18% three-point shooting.

Nneka Ogwumike delivered the game’s most complete offensive performance with 23 points and 12 rebounds. Rae Burrell added 22 points, while Erica Wheeler supplied efficient perimeter shooting and four assists. Dearica Hamby contributed 11 rebounds and four steals despite scoring only six points.

For Seattle, Flau’jae Johnson led the scoring with 19 points, while Malonga recorded a 17-point, 15-rebound performance. Ezi Magbegor and Zia Cooke also contributed across several statistical categories.

The final result gave Los Angeles a 2-1 advantage in the season series. More importantly, the detailed numbers explain how a team can lose the rebounding battle and still win comfortably when it creates better shots, shoots more efficiently, and makes a substantially higher percentage of its three-point attempts.