Detroit Lions vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats
The Detroit Lions vs Los Angeles Rams match player stats from the 2025 NFL regular season tell the story of a high-scoring game that changed dramatically after halftime. The Los Angeles Rams defeated the Detroit Lions 41-34 at SoFi Stadium in Week 15, improving to 11-3 while Detroit fell to 8-6. The game was played on December 14, 2025, and the official game ID was 401772909.
At first glance, the final score suggests a relatively even contest, and for two quarters it was exactly that. Detroit led 24-17 at halftime after Jared Goff threw three touchdown passes. Amon-Ra St. Brown produced a huge receiving performance, while Jameson Williams added another touchdown on a 31-yard reception.
The second half, however, belonged to Los Angeles. The Rams scored 17 unanswered points in the third quarter and built enough separation to withstand Detroit’s late fourth-quarter push. Matthew Stafford finished with 368 passing yards and two touchdown passes, while Puka Nacua delivered one of the most productive receiving performances of the game with nine catches for 181 yards.
The numbers become even more interesting when the individual performances are examined in context. Detroit produced 338 passing yards, but its rushing attack generated only 70 yards. Los Angeles combined 368 passing yards with 159 rushing yards, giving the Rams a much more balanced offensive output.
Detroit Lions vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The matchup featured two offenses capable of creating explosive plays, and both quarterbacks produced strong statistical performances.
| Category | Detroit Lions | Los Angeles Rams |
| Final Score | 34 | 41 |
| First Quarter | 7 | 7 |
| Second Quarter | 17 | 10 |
| Third Quarter | 0 | 17 |
| Fourth Quarter | 10 | 7 |
| Passing Yards | 338 | 368 |
| Rushing Yards | 70 | 159 |
| Total Passing TDs | 3 | 2 |
| Rushing TDs | 1 | 3 |
| Total Offensive TDs | 4 | 5 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 1 |
| Sacks Allowed | 1 | 2 |
The most important statistical difference was not passing production. Detroit actually stayed close to Los Angeles through the air.
The separation came on the ground.
The Rams rushed for 159 yards on 29 attempts, averaging 5.5 yards per carry. Detroit managed only 70 rushing yards on 20 attempts, averaging 3.5 yards per carry.
That created a major contrast in offensive efficiency. Los Angeles did not need Stafford to carry the entire offense because Kyren Williams and Blake Corum consistently contributed on the ground.
Detroit, meanwhile, relied much more heavily on Goff and its receiving corps.
Jared Goff Passing Performance
Jared Goff completed 25 of 41 passes for 338 yards and three touchdowns without throwing an interception. His official passer rating was 111.6.
Those numbers show how effectively Detroit moved the ball through the air.
Goff averaged 8.2 yards per attempt, which is a strong figure considering the volume of his passing workload. He attempted 41 passes, and Detroit converted those opportunities into 338 passing yards.
The bigger issue was that Detroit’s passing success did not translate into enough points during the second half.
Goff’s first-half performance was particularly important. Detroit scored 24 points before halftime, with all three of Goff’s touchdown passes coming during the opening two quarters.
The quarterback did not throw an interception, which helped Detroit maintain control of the game for long stretches.
However, the Rams defense was able to limit Detroit to 125 yards in the second half, according to the game recap.
That shift is essential when interpreting the passing statistics.
A quarterback can finish with more than 300 yards and three touchdowns while his team still loses because production is not distributed evenly across four quarters.
Goff’s Most Important Numbers
- Completions: 25
- Attempts: 41
- Completion percentage: 61.0%
- Passing yards: 338
- Yards per attempt: 8.2
- Touchdowns: 3
- Interceptions: 0
- Sacks: 1 for 12 yards
- Passer rating: 111.6
Goff also benefited from two outstanding receiving performances.
Amon-Ra St. Brown repeatedly created separation and Jameson Williams provided explosive plays downfield.
The combination gave Detroit enough passing efficiency to score 34 points, but the lack of rushing production became increasingly important as the game progressed.
Matthew Stafford Passing Performance
Matthew Stafford finished with 24 completions on 38 attempts for 368 yards, two touchdowns and one interception. His passer rating was listed at 101.7 in the supplied box-score data, while ESPN’s box score displays 101.7 for Stafford’s rating.
Stafford’s statistical profile was different from Goff’s.
He threw for 30 more yards despite attempting three fewer passes. His 9.7 yards per attempt demonstrated how effectively Los Angeles generated bigger gains through the passing game.
Stafford’s second half was especially significant.
After Detroit entered halftime with a 24-17 advantage, Stafford helped direct a three-touchdown surge across the third and fourth quarters.
The Rams also used the threat of their rushing attack to create favorable passing opportunities.
NFL and ESPN reporting highlighted Stafford’s effectiveness against Detroit’s aggressive pressure strategy. ESPN reported that Detroit blitzed Stafford on 51.2% of his dropbacks, yet he completed 14 of 19 passes for 202 yards and two touchdowns when facing five or more pass rushers.
That statistic provides useful context that the basic box score does not show.
Detroit was not simply allowing Stafford to operate comfortably. The Lions attempted to pressure him aggressively, but Los Angeles was able to produce explosive passing plays despite that approach.
Stafford’s Key Numbers
- Completions: 24
- Attempts: 38
- Completion percentage: 63.2%
- Passing yards: 368
- Yards per attempt: 9.7
- Touchdowns: 2
- Interceptions: 1
- Sacks: 2 for 8 yards
- Passer rating: 101.7
Stafford’s one interception did not prevent Los Angeles from controlling the second half.
That is an important reminder that turnovers have to be viewed within the larger flow of a game.
Amon-Ra St. Brown Was Detroit’s Biggest Receiving Weapon
Amon-Ra St. Brown produced one of the best statistical performances in the matchup.
He caught 13 passes for 164 yards and two touchdowns on 18 targets. His longest reception covered 52 yards.
The volume is especially notable.
St. Brown received 18 of Detroit’s 38 pass targets, meaning nearly half of the Lions’ passing targets went his way.
He also accounted for almost half of Detroit’s receiving yards.
His two touchdown receptions came during the first half and helped Detroit establish a 24-17 halftime advantage.
ESPN’s analysis reported that St. Brown caught 12 passes for 155 yards and a touchdown against zone coverage.
That helps explain why his production remained so consistent.
Detroit repeatedly found ways to put the ball in the hands of its most reliable receiver, but the Rams were able to adjust enough after halftime to prevent the Lions from maintaining their first-half offensive pace.
St. Brown’s Receiving Line
- Targets: 18
- Receptions: 13
- Receiving yards: 164
- Average: 12.6 yards per reception
- Touchdowns: 2
- Long reception: 52 yards
His 13 receptions also represented more than half of Goff’s 25 completions.
That level of involvement demonstrates how central St. Brown was to Detroit’s passing game.
Jameson Williams Added Another Explosive Performance
Jameson Williams finished with seven receptions for 134 yards and one touchdown on 10 targets.
His average was 19.1 yards per reception, making him Detroit’s primary big-play threat.
Williams’ 31-yard touchdown reception came with only 30 seconds remaining in the first half and extended Detroit’s lead to 24-14 before Los Angeles kicked a field goal.
The combination of St. Brown and Williams created a difficult matchup for the Rams.
St. Brown consistently generated volume, while Williams supplied explosive gains.
Together, they accounted for 20 receptions, 298 receiving yards and all three of Detroit’s passing touchdowns.
That means these two receivers accounted for approximately 88% of Detroit’s 338 receiving yards.
This is one of the clearest takeaways from the box score.
Detroit’s passing game was not broadly distributed. It was concentrated around two highly productive receivers.
Puka Nacua Dominated the Rams Receiving Game
Puka Nacua was arguably the most productive individual receiver on either team.
He caught nine passes for 181 yards on 11 targets, averaging 20.1 yards per reception. His longest catch covered 39 yards.
Although he did not score a touchdown, his yardage total was enormous.
Nacua’s 181 receiving yards represented almost half of Los Angeles’ 368 passing yards.
His performance was particularly important because Detroit focused considerable attention on Stafford.
When a defense sends pressure at the quarterback, the offense needs receivers who can capitalize quickly.
Nacua repeatedly did exactly that.
ESPN reported that he caught all four of his vertical-route targets for 134 yards, showing how important his downfield production was to the Rams’ offensive success.
Nacua’s Receiving Line
- Targets: 11
- Receptions: 9
- Receiving yards: 181
- Average: 20.1 yards per reception
- Touchdowns: 0
- Long reception: 39 yards
His 181 yards were 47 yards more than St. Brown’s total according to the official ESPN box score, although the ESPN game recap rounded St. Brown’s total to 163 yards in its narrative.
For statistical work, the box score figure of 164 receiving yards is the more appropriate number to use with the supplied receiving table.
Colby Parkinson Produced Two Touchdowns
Colby Parkinson was another major factor in the Rams’ victory.
He caught five passes for 75 yards and two touchdowns on seven targets.
Both touchdowns came in the second half.
His 26-yard touchdown reception helped Los Angeles take a 27-24 lead in the third quarter. Later, Parkinson caught an 11-yard touchdown pass with 4:49 remaining in the fourth quarter to give the Rams a 41-27 advantage.
Those two plays were much more than isolated scoring statistics.
They arrived during the exact period when Los Angeles took control of the game.
Parkinson’s production also demonstrated the importance of secondary receiving options. Detroit could not focus exclusively on Nacua because the Rams had other players capable of converting opportunities into points.
Davante Adams Provided Complementary Production
Davante Adams finished with four receptions for 71 yards on nine targets.
His 17.8 yards per reception showed that he was also capable of creating chunk plays.
Adams did not score, but his presence added another layer to the Rams’ passing attack.
When Nacua commanded defensive attention, Adams provided another route to explosive gains.
The Rams therefore had multiple receivers producing meaningful yardage rather than depending on a single player.
The Rams Rushing Attack Created the Difference
The clearest statistical advantage in the matchup came on the ground.
Los Angeles finished with 159 rushing yards on 29 attempts, averaging 5.5 yards per carry.
Detroit managed only 70 rushing yards on 20 attempts.
That is an 89-yard advantage for the Rams.
The difference became even more important because Los Angeles converted its rushing production into three touchdowns.
Detroit produced only one rushing touchdown.
Kyren Williams Led the Rams Ground Game
Kyren Williams rushed 15 times for 78 yards and two touchdowns.
His 5.2 yards per carry was a strong contribution, and his longest run covered 19 yards.
More importantly, Williams scored twice.
His first touchdown came on a 4-yard run in the first quarter.
His second came on a 1-yard run in the second quarter.
Those scores helped keep Los Angeles within striking distance while Detroit was producing heavily through the air.
Williams’ role also helped balance Stafford’s passing workload.
The Rams did not need every offensive possession to become a passing showcase.
They could use Williams to establish the run and then attack through Stafford when opportunities appeared.
Blake Corum Added 71 Rushing Yards
Blake Corum was highly efficient on his 11 rushing attempts.
He gained 71 yards, averaging 6.5 yards per carry.
His longest run went for 24 yards.
Corum also scored the Rams’ final touchdown of the third quarter, extending Los Angeles’ lead to 34-24.
His contribution is particularly significant because it came alongside Williams.
The Rams were not simply relying on one running back.
Williams produced 78 yards, Corum added 71, and together they generated 149 rushing yards.
That accounted for nearly all of Los Angeles’ team rushing production.
Detroit’s Rushing Numbers Were Much Lower
Jahmyr Gibbs carried the ball 13 times for 38 yards.
His average was only 2.9 yards per carry, and his longest run was six yards.
David Montgomery carried seven times for 32 yards, averaging 4.6 yards per carry. He also scored Detroit’s final touchdown on a 1-yard run late in the fourth quarter.
As a team, Detroit managed:
- 20 carries
- 70 yards
- 3.5 yards per carry
- 1 rushing touchdown
- 10-yard longest run
This was the statistical weakness that most clearly separated the two offenses.
Detroit’s passing attack generated 338 yards, but the running game produced only 70.
Los Angeles generated 368 passing yards and 159 rushing yards.
The Rams therefore finished with a much more balanced offensive profile.
The Third Quarter Changed the Game
The single most important section of the game was the third quarter.
Detroit entered halftime leading 24-17.
Then the Lions were shut out in the third quarter.
Los Angeles scored 17 points.
That created a 34-24 Rams advantage entering the final period.
The turnaround was not simply a matter of one big play.
Los Angeles produced a field goal, a touchdown pass to Parkinson and a rushing touchdown by Corum.
The Rams were able to sustain drives and repeatedly move the football.
NFL’s Week 15 analysis described the Rams’ second-half surge as the decisive factor after Detroit had gained 271 yards in the first half.
That is perhaps the most useful lesson from the game.
The Lions were capable of winning individual matchups and producing explosive plays, but the Rams were better able to maintain offensive efficiency after halftime.
Defensive Player Stats
The offensive numbers dominate the box score, but several defensive performances deserve attention.
Detroit recorded:
- 72 total tackles
- 38 solo tackles
- 2 sacks
- 1 tackle for loss
- 7 passes defended
- 8 quarterback hits
Jack Campbell led Detroit with 14 total tackles and nine solo tackles.
Amik Robertson recorded one sack.
Aidan Hutchinson produced an interception and returned it 58 yards without scoring.
Los Angeles recorded:
- 62 total tackles
- 32 solo tackles
- 1 sack
- 3 tackles for loss
- 2 passes defended
- 8 quarterback hits
Nate Landman led the Rams with 10 total tackles, including six solo tackles.
Kobie Turner recorded one sack.
These numbers reveal an interesting defensive contrast.
Detroit generated two sacks and intercepted Stafford once, but the Rams’ offense still produced 41 points.
Los Angeles had only one sack, but its defense managed to reduce Detroit’s offensive production significantly in the second half.
Aidan Hutchinson’s Interception
Aidan Hutchinson’s interception was an important individual defensive play.
He returned the interception 58 yards, giving Detroit a significant defensive gain without allowing a turnover to become a lost opportunity.
However, Detroit was unable to turn the defensive takeaway into enough overall control.
This illustrates why individual defensive statistics need to be connected to game situation.
An interception can be a major play, but the overall effect depends on what happens afterward.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams also contributed to the final score.
Detroit kicker Jake Bates converted two of three field-goal attempts and all four extra-point attempts.
He finished with 10 points and made a long field goal of 48 yards.
Los Angeles kicker Harrison Mevis was perfect on two field-goal attempts and converted all five extra points.
He finished with 11 points.
The Rams also generated useful kick-return production.
Jordan Whittington returned four kicks for 102 yards, averaging 25.5 yards per return.
Ronnie Rivers added two returns for 60 yards, averaging 30 yards per return.
Los Angeles finished with 162 kick-return yards.
That field-position contribution complemented the Rams’ offensive performance.
Detroit Lions vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats: What the Numbers Reveal
The box score shows several clear themes.
1. Passing Production Was Relatively Close
Goff threw for 338 yards.
Stafford threw for 368.
The difference was only 30 yards.
Both quarterbacks produced multiple touchdown passes.
Goff had the cleaner turnover line because he did not throw an interception.
Yet Stafford’s offense produced seven more points.
That demonstrates why quarterback yardage alone does not explain the outcome.
2. The Rams Won the Ground Game
This was a much larger difference.
Los Angeles gained 159 rushing yards.
Detroit gained 70.
The Rams averaged two more yards per rushing attempt.
They also scored three rushing touchdowns compared with Detroit’s one.
This gave Los Angeles another dependable way to move the football.
3. Detroit Had Outstanding Receiver Production
St. Brown and Williams combined for 298 yards.
That is an enormous share of the Lions’ passing offense.
The duo also accounted for all three passing touchdowns.
Detroit clearly had enough receiving production to win a high-scoring game.
4. Los Angeles Had More Offensive Balance
The Rams distributed production among several players.
Nacua had 181 receiving yards.
Parkinson had 75 yards and two touchdowns.
Adams had 71 yards.
Williams and Corum combined for 149 rushing yards.
That distribution made the Rams more difficult to defend over four quarters.
5. The Second Half Was the Deciding Factor
Detroit scored 24 points before halftime and only 10 afterward.
Los Angeles scored 17 points in the third quarter alone.
That quarter effectively changed the direction of the game.
Why the Matchup Was So High Scoring
There were several reasons this game reached 75 combined points.
Both teams had quarterbacks willing and able to attack downfield.
Detroit averaged 8.2 yards per pass attempt.
Los Angeles averaged 9.7.
Both offenses also had receivers who could turn ordinary opportunities into explosive gains.
The receiving numbers show this clearly.
St. Brown averaged 12.6 yards per catch.
Williams averaged 19.1.
Nacua averaged 20.1.
Adams averaged 17.8.
Those are strong explosive-play profiles.
The Rams also benefited from efficient rushing.
A 5.5-yard team rushing average gave Stafford favorable offensive conditions.
The combination of efficient rushing and aggressive passing helped Los Angeles maintain pressure on Detroit’s defense.
How Detroit Could Have Changed the Statistical Pattern
This is not a claim about hypothetical outcomes. It is an interpretation of the statistical pattern visible in the game.
Detroit needed greater balance between passing and rushing production.
The Lions attempted 41 passes but ran the ball only 20 times.
That imbalance was understandable because Goff and his receivers were producing.
However, the 70 rushing yards meant Detroit could not consistently create the same offensive balance as Los Angeles.
The second issue was second-half efficiency.
Detroit scored zero points in the third quarter.
That was the most damaging statistical period of the game.
Finally, the Lions needed a stronger response to Los Angeles’ rushing production.
Allowing 159 rushing yards at 5.5 yards per carry made it easier for the Rams to keep their offense on schedule.
How Los Angeles Controlled the Second Half
The Rams’ adjustment was visible in several areas.
First, they continued attacking through Nacua and the passing game.
Second, Williams and Corum kept producing on the ground.
Third, Stafford handled Detroit’s pressure effectively.
ESPN’s advanced breakdown showed Stafford completing 14 of 19 passes for 202 yards and two touchdowns against five or more pass rushers.
That statistic is particularly revealing.
Detroit attempted to create pressure, but the Rams quarterback was able to respond with productive throws.
At the same time, Los Angeles’ running game forced Detroit to respect the possibility of a handoff.
That combination created a difficult defensive problem.
Comparing the Quarterbacks
| Statistic | Jared Goff | Matthew Stafford |
| Completions | 25 | 24 |
| Attempts | 41 | 38 |
| Completion % | 61.0% | 63.2% |
| Passing Yards | 338 | 368 |
| Yards/Attempt | 8.2 | 9.7 |
| TDs | 3 | 2 |
| INTs | 0 | 1 |
| Sacks | 1 | 2 |
| Passer Rating | 111.6 | 101.7 |
Goff had the better passer rating and avoided turnovers.
Stafford had more yards and a higher yards-per-attempt figure.
Neither statistical line tells the entire story by itself.
Goff produced enough passing offense for Detroit to score 34 points.
Stafford produced enough passing offense, combined with the Rams’ running game, for Los Angeles to score 41.
Comparing the Top Receivers
| Player | Receptions | Yards | TDs | Targets |
| Amon-Ra St. Brown | 13 | 164 | 2 | 18 |
| Jameson Williams | 7 | 134 | 1 | 10 |
| Puka Nacua | 9 | 181 | 0 | 11 |
| Colby Parkinson | 5 | 75 | 2 | 7 |
| Davante Adams | 4 | 71 | 0 | 9 |
The table shows two different offensive structures.
Detroit concentrated its passing production around St. Brown and Williams.
Los Angeles spread meaningful production among Nacua, Parkinson and Adams.
Detroit’s two leading receivers produced 298 yards.
Los Angeles’ three leading receivers produced 327 yards.
The Rams therefore maintained a slightly broader receiving distribution while also receiving substantial rushing production.
Team Statistical Comparison
| Category | Lions | Rams |
| Passing Yards | 338 | 368 |
| Rushing Yards | 70 | 159 |
| Total Offensive Yards | 408 | 527 |
| Passing TDs | 3 | 2 |
| Rushing TDs | 1 | 3 |
| Total TDs | 4 | 5 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 1 |
| Sacks Allowed | 1 | 2 |
| First-Half Points | 24 | 17 |
| Second-Half Points | 10 | 24 |
The total yardage difference is striking.
Los Angeles produced 527 yards of offense compared with Detroit’s 408.
That is a 119-yard advantage.
Yet the Lions still scored 34 points because their passing offense was highly efficient in the red zone and produced three passing touchdowns.
The Rams’ ability to combine 368 passing yards with 159 rushing yards ultimately produced the larger offensive output.
What Fantasy Football Managers Can Learn From the Box Score
Although this was a single game and should not be treated as a standalone projection tool, several fantasy-relevant observations emerge.
St. Brown’s 18 targets and 13 receptions demonstrate an extremely high-volume role.
Williams’ 19.1 yards per reception show his ability to generate value through explosive plays rather than sheer target volume.
Nacua’s nine catches for 181 yards illustrate his enormous big-play potential.
Parkinson’s two touchdowns show why touchdown variance can dramatically change a player’s fantasy output.
Kyren Williams’ 78 rushing yards and two touchdowns combined volume with scoring opportunities.
The important lesson is to distinguish between volume and touchdown-dependent production.
A receiver with 18 targets has a different statistical foundation from one whose fantasy value depends primarily on scoring.
A Closer Look at Offensive Efficiency
One of the most useful ways to interpret the game is to look beyond the final score.
Detroit averaged:
- 8.2 yards per pass attempt
- 3.5 yards per rushing attempt
- 13.5 yards per reception
Los Angeles averaged:
- 9.7 yards per pass attempt
- 5.5 yards per rushing attempt
- 15.3 yards per reception
The Rams were more efficient in every one of these basic categories.
That does not mean Detroit’s offense was ineffective.
A 34-point performance is substantial.
It means Los Angeles generated more explosive and efficient production across both phases of its offense.
The Importance of Offensive Balance
The game provides a useful example of why offensive balance matters.
Detroit had an outstanding passing game.
But its rushing attack struggled.
Los Angeles had a strong passing game and an even stronger rushing performance.
That difference allowed the Rams to create more ways to attack the defense.
When one area of an offense becomes less effective, balance can help compensate.
Los Angeles had that flexibility.
Detroit’s Strongest Statistical Takeaways
The Lions can take several positive statistical observations from the game.
Goff threw three touchdowns without an interception.
St. Brown produced 164 receiving yards and two touchdowns.
Williams produced 134 receiving yards and a touchdown.
Detroit committed no fumbles according to the supplied game data.
The defense also recorded an interception and two sacks.
The biggest issue was not a complete offensive collapse.
It was the inability to maintain the first-half level of production after halftime.
Los Angeles’ Strongest Statistical Takeaways
The Rams’ most important strengths were balance and second-half execution.
Stafford passed for 368 yards.
Nacua gained 181 receiving yards.
Williams and Corum combined for 149 rushing yards.
Parkinson caught two touchdown passes.
The Rams scored 17 points in the third quarter and added another seven in the fourth.
Those numbers explain how Los Angeles turned a seven-point halftime deficit into a seven-point victory.
What the Final Score Does Not Tell You
A 41-34 final score can make the game look like a simple shootout.
The detailed numbers reveal something more specific.
Detroit was at its best early.
Los Angeles became increasingly effective as the game progressed.
The Lions’ offense relied heavily on two receivers.
The Rams combined several receiving options with two productive running backs.
Detroit’s quarterback had the cleaner turnover line.
Los Angeles had the stronger rushing performance.
Those details provide a much more useful understanding than the final score alone.
Detroit Lions vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways
The most important numbers from the matchup can be summarized in several points.
- Jared Goff passed for 338 yards and three touchdowns without an interception.
- Matthew Stafford passed for 368 yards and two touchdowns.
- Amon-Ra St. Brown caught 13 passes for 164 yards and two touchdowns.
- Jameson Williams recorded 134 receiving yards and one touchdown.
- Puka Nacua led all receivers with 181 yards on nine catches.
- Colby Parkinson caught two touchdown passes.
- Kyren Williams rushed for 78 yards and two touchdowns.
- Blake Corum added 71 rushing yards and one touchdown.
- Los Angeles outrushed Detroit 159 yards to 70.
- The Rams scored 17 points in the third quarter while Detroit scored none.
- Detroit finished with 408 total offensive yards.
- Los Angeles finished with 527 total offensive yards.
- Aidan Hutchinson intercepted Stafford and returned the ball 58 yards.
- Detroit’s defense recorded eight quarterback hits.
- Los Angeles completed the comeback after trailing 24-17 at halftime.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Detroit Lions and Los Angeles Rams?
The Los Angeles Rams defeated the Detroit Lions 41-34 in Week 15 of the 2025 regular season. The Rams trailed 24-17 at halftime before scoring 17 points in the third quarter.
Who led the Detroit Lions in receiving?
Amon-Ra St. Brown led Detroit with 13 receptions for 164 yards and two touchdowns on 18 targets. Jameson Williams followed with seven receptions for 134 yards and one touchdown.
Who led the Los Angeles Rams in receiving?
Puka Nacua led the Rams with nine receptions for 181 yards on 11 targets. His 181 yards were the highest receiving total in the game.
How many passing yards did Jared Goff have?
Jared Goff completed 25 of 41 passes for 338 yards and three touchdowns with no interceptions. His passer rating was 111.6.
How many rushing yards did the Rams have?
Los Angeles rushed for 159 yards on 29 attempts, averaging 5.5 yards per carry. Kyren Williams had 78 yards and Blake Corum had 71 yards.
When was the Lions vs Rams game played?
The game was played on Sunday, December 14, 2025, at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, California. Some supplied datasets may display December 15 because of date handling or publication timestamps, but the official NFL schedule and ESPN game record list December 14.
Conclusion
The Detroit Lions vs Los Angeles Rams match player stats show a game that was competitive for two quarters before Los Angeles established control through a combination of passing efficiency, rushing production and second-half scoring.
Jared Goff delivered 338 passing yards and three touchdowns, while Amon-Ra St. Brown and Jameson Williams combined for 298 receiving yards. Detroit’s passing attack was productive enough to score 34 points, but the Lions’ 70 rushing yards limited their offensive balance.
The Rams produced 527 total yards, including 368 through the air and 159 on the ground. Matthew Stafford’s 368 passing yards were supported by Puka Nacua’s 181 receiving yards, Colby Parkinson’s two touchdown receptions and a rushing attack led by Kyren Williams and Blake Corum.
The decisive statistical swing came after halftime. Detroit led 24-17 at the break, but Los Angeles scored 17 points in the third quarter while holding Detroit scoreless. The Rams entered the fourth quarter with a 34-24 advantage and ultimately protected the lead despite Detroit’s late touchdown.
For anyone studying this matchup, the most useful takeaway is that the final 41-34 score only tells part of the story. The deeper player statistics reveal how Detroit’s passing game created explosive production, while Los Angeles combined efficient passing with a much stronger rushing attack and a dramatic second-half response.
The complete official game information can be checked through the NFL official game center.
