Lakers vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats

The lakers vs utah jazz match player stats tell a clear story from the April 13, 2026 meeting at crypto.com Arena. Los Angeles defeated Utah 131-107, finishing the regular season with a convincing offensive performance. The Lakers shot 55% from the field, made 15 of 34 three-point attempts, collected 49 rebounds, and recorded 37 assists. Utah finished at 44% shooting and connected on only 7 of 34 three-point attempts.

The final score alone does not fully explain why the game became one-sided. Los Angeles controlled the contest from the opening quarter, built a 17-point halftime advantage, and continued extending the lead after the break. The Lakers also received important contributions beyond their biggest names, including Rui Hachimura, Deandre Ayton, Marcus Smart, and Dalton Knecht.

For Utah, Oscar Tshiebwe was the standout individual performer with 29 points and 17 rebounds. Bez Mbeng added 14 points and 9 assists, while Brice Sensabaugh supplied 15 points from the bench. However, Utah’s inefficient perimeter shooting and difficulty slowing down Los Angeles created a gap that became increasingly difficult to close.

Lakers vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats

The April 13 matchup ended with the Lakers ahead 131-107. The result gave Los Angeles a 53-29 record, including a 28-13 home mark, while Utah finished 22-60 overall and 8-33 on the road.

The Lakers also completed a 4-0 season sweep over the Jazz.

Final Score by Quarter

Quarter	Utah Jazz	Los Angeles Lakers
1st	22	32
2nd	23	30
3rd	29	33
4th	33	36
Final	107	131

The quarter-by-quarter numbers are important because Los Angeles did not rely on one explosive stretch to win. The Lakers outscored Utah in every quarter.

That consistency is one of the strongest statistical indicators from the game.

Los Angeles opened with a 32-22 advantage, added another seven points to its lead during the second quarter, and entered halftime ahead 62-45. Utah improved offensively after halftime, scoring 29 points in the third and 33 in the fourth, but the Lakers continued producing efficient offense.

According to the official ESPN box score, Los Angeles ultimately built a largest lead of 30 points and led for 99% of the game. (ESPN)

Game Overview and Statistical Context

The Lakers entered the matchup with a major advantage in overall season record and home performance.

Los Angeles finished the regular season at 53-29 and went 28-13 at home. Utah ended at 22-60 with an 8-33 road record. Those records provide useful context, but the game itself showed exactly where the difference appeared on the court.

The most important statistical advantages were:

• Los Angeles shot 55% from the field compared with Utah’s 44%.
• The Lakers made 15 three-pointers while Utah made only 7.
• Los Angeles recorded 37 assists compared with Utah’s 25.
• The Lakers grabbed 49 total rebounds against Utah’s 42.
• Los Angeles scored 60 points in the paint compared with Utah’s 50.
• The Lakers scored 20 fast-break points compared with Utah’s 17.
• Los Angeles committed 15 turnovers while Utah committed 16.

The turnover difference was relatively small, so this was not primarily a game decided by ball security. Instead, shooting efficiency, ball movement, rebounding, and overall offensive execution were much more influential.

This is an important distinction when interpreting a box score. A team can win by forcing turnovers, dominating offensive rebounds, or simply making more shots. In this matchup, the Lakers’ advantage was much broader.

Lakers Player Performance

Los Angeles had four players reach double figures among its most prominent contributors, while the bench added several useful scoring bursts.

Rui Hachimura

Rui Hachimura delivered one of the most complete performances of the game.

He finished with:

• 22 points
• 10 rebounds
• 8-for-12 shooting
• 3-for-5 from three-point range
• 3-for-4 at the free-throw line
• 1 steal
• +19 plus/minus

The combination of scoring efficiency and rebounding made Hachimura especially valuable.

His 8-for-12 shooting translated to a field-goal percentage of 66.7%. He also converted three of his five three-point attempts, which meant Utah could not simply allow him space on the perimeter.

His +19 was the highest plus/minus among Lakers players.

The statistic should not be treated as an isolated measure of individual quality, but in this particular game it matched what the rest of the box score showed. Hachimura was highly efficient, rebounded well, and helped maintain Los Angeles’ advantage whenever he was on the floor.

Deandre Ayton

Deandre Ayton also recorded 22 points and 10 rebounds.

His shooting line was particularly impressive:

• 10-for-14 from the field
• 71.4% field-goal shooting
• 2-for-2 from the free-throw line
• 10 rebounds
• 3 blocks
• 1 assist

Ayton did not attempt a three-pointer, but he did not need to. His 10-for-14 shooting shows how effectively he converted opportunities inside the arc.

The Lakers also received strong interior production from him while maintaining their perimeter spacing through other players.

With Hachimura and Ayton both reaching 22 points, Los Angeles had two efficient scoring options operating in different areas of the floor.

LeBron James

LeBron James scored 18 points in just 17 minutes.

He finished with:

• 18 points
• 6 assists
• 4 rebounds
• 3 steals
• 6-for-15 shooting
• 6-for-7 free throws
• +14 plus/minus

One of the most important details is his playing time.

James did not need a full workload to influence the game. His 6 assists demonstrate that his value was not limited to scoring. He helped organize the offense, created opportunities for teammates, and contributed defensively through three steals.

ESPN’s game recap reported that James scored 18 points, grabbed four rebounds, and delivered six assists in the first half before sitting out the second half as a precaution. (ESPN)

That context matters when reading his final stat line. His 18 points were not the result of heavy fourth-quarter usage. The game was effectively under control before he needed to play additional minutes.

Marcus Smart

Marcus Smart provided one of the most interesting statistical performances for Los Angeles.

He scored only 5 points, but he recorded 10 assists.

His line included:

• 5 points
• 2 rebounds
• 10 assists
• 3 turnovers
• 1 steal
• 1-for-7 shooting
• +13 plus/minus

A casual reading of the scoring column might suggest a quiet game. The assist total tells a different story.

Smart’s 10 assists were the highest total on the Lakers. His ability to distribute the ball helped Los Angeles reach 37 team assists.

The Lakers therefore did not need their primary creators to score enormous individual totals. They generated offense through passing and shared responsibility.

Luke Kennard

Luke Kennard played 11 minutes and scored 3 points on 1-for-1 shooting.

His role was limited in this game, but the larger context is important. Los Angeles had enough offensive production from its other players that Kennard did not need a high-volume scoring role.

Dalton Knecht

Dalton Knecht was arguably the most dangerous perimeter scorer off the Lakers bench.

He recorded:

• 17 points
• 6-for-9 shooting
• 5-for-6 from three-point range
• 2 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 1 steal

His 5-for-6 performance from beyond the arc was one of the clearest individual shooting highlights of the night.

Knecht made five three-pointers while the entire Utah team made seven.

That comparison illustrates how significant his perimeter efficiency was. Utah needed 34 three-point attempts to make seven. Knecht needed only six attempts to make five.

Other Lakers Bench Contributions

The Lakers also received useful minutes from several reserves.

Nick Smith Jr. scored 12 points and made two three-pointers.

Bronny James added 11 points while shooting 4-for-7 from the field and 3-for-4 from three-point range.

Adou Thiero contributed 8 points and 4 rebounds.

Jarred Vanderbilt recorded 4 points, 4 rebounds, 2 assists, 2 steals, and 1 block.

Maxi Kleber finished with 2 points and 6 rebounds.

These contributions explain why Los Angeles was able to remain productive even after its most established players reduced their workload.

Utah Jazz Player Performance

Utah had one dominant individual performance and several useful supporting contributions, but the overall offensive efficiency was not strong enough to keep pace with Los Angeles.

Oscar Tshiebwe

Oscar Tshiebwe was the clear statistical leader for Utah.

He finished with:

• 29 points
• 17 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 12-for-17 shooting
• 5-for-8 free throws
• 9 offensive rebounds
• 8 defensive rebounds

His 12-for-17 shooting equaled a remarkable 70.6% from the field.

Tshiebwe was particularly effective on the offensive glass. His nine offensive rebounds represented more than half of Utah’s 17 offensive rebounds as a team.

This was a genuine high-level individual effort despite the final result.

The problem for Utah was that his production was not matched by enough efficient scoring elsewhere.

Cody Williams

Cody Williams finished with:

• 14 points
• 3 rebounds
• 6 assists
• 2 steals
• 5-for-15 shooting
• 4-for-4 free throws

His six assists were valuable, but the 5-for-15 shooting line shows the challenge Utah faced offensively.

Williams contributed as a playmaker, but his overall shooting efficiency was below the standard required against a Lakers team that was converting its opportunities at a much higher rate.

Ace Bailey

Ace Bailey scored 15 points with:

• 7-for-21 shooting
• 1-for-9 from three
• 3 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 1 block

His three-point shooting was a major issue.

Bailey attempted nine threes but made only one. Against a Lakers offense shooting 44% from deep, Utah needed much better perimeter efficiency to stay within striking distance.

Bez Mbeng

Bez Mbeng provided Utah with an important all-around contribution.

He finished with:

• 14 points
• 4 rebounds
• 9 assists
• 5 steals
• 5-for-10 shooting
• 1-for-4 from three
• 3-for-5 free throws

The nine assists and five steals were both team-leading marks for Utah.

His five steals were particularly notable because they helped Utah create defensive pressure. However, those defensive plays were not enough to compensate for the larger shooting gap.

Blake Hinson

Blake Hinson recorded:

• 10 points
• 6 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 2-for-8 three-point shooting
• 1 steal

His +/− was -8, which was the best mark among Utah’s starters.

That is a useful reminder that plus/minus should be read in context. Hinson was still part of a lineup that was outscored, but his individual plus/minus was better than those of Utah’s other starters.

Brice Sensabaugh

Brice Sensabaugh led the Utah bench with 15 points.

He shot 4-for-10 from the field and 3-for-8 from three-point range.

His 15 points were important because Utah needed bench scoring to complement Tshiebwe’s interior production.

John Konchar added 4 points and 7 rebounds, while Hayden Gray scored 6 points.

Team Shooting Comparison

The most obvious difference in the box score was shooting efficiency.

Statistic	Jazz	Lakers
Field Goals	41-94	51-93
Field Goal %	44%	55%
Three-Pointers	7-34	15-34
Three-Point %	21%	44%
Free Throws	18-27	14-17
Free-Throw %	67%	82%

The Lakers attempted one fewer field goal than Utah but made 10 more.

That is a major efficiency advantage.

Los Angeles also made eight more three-pointers despite both teams attempting 34.

This means the Lakers did not win simply because they took more shots. They won because they converted a much higher percentage of their opportunities.

The three-point comparison is especially striking:

• Utah: 7-for-34
• Los Angeles: 15-for-34

That created a 24-point difference in made three-point baskets alone.

Why the Lakers Won

The box score points to several interconnected reasons.

1. Superior Shot Making

The Lakers shot 55% overall.

When a team combines 55% field-goal shooting with 44% three-point shooting, it becomes difficult for an opponent to compensate without producing extraordinary offense at the other end.

Utah shot only 44% overall.

2. Better Three-Point Efficiency

The Lakers’ 15 made threes were more than double Utah’s seven.

Dalton Knecht was a major factor, but the Lakers received additional three-point production from Hachimura, Nick Smith Jr., Bronny James, and others.

Utah, meanwhile, had several high-volume perimeter attempts that did not fall.

3. More Effective Ball Movement

Los Angeles recorded 37 assists on 51 made field goals.

That means a substantial portion of its made shots came through assisted offense.

Smart’s 10 assists and James’ six were central to that figure.

Utah recorded 25 assists on 41 made field goals. That is respectable, but it did not match the Lakers’ level of offensive connectivity.

4. Rebounding Advantage

Los Angeles grabbed 49 rebounds compared with Utah’s 42.

Utah did have an edge in offensive rebounding, 17 to 11, but Los Angeles dominated defensive rebounding, 38 to 25.

That defensive rebounding advantage helped the Lakers finish possessions and reduce second-chance opportunities.

5. Interior Efficiency

Los Angeles scored 60 points in the paint.

Utah scored 50.

Ayton’s 10-for-14 shooting was a major contributor, while Hachimura also converted efficiently around the interior and mid-range areas.

6. Consistency Across Four Quarters

The Lakers outscored Utah in every period.

That is arguably more important than any individual scoring burst.

The Lakers led by 10 after the first quarter, 17 at halftime, 21 after three quarters, and eventually won by 24.

Utah never produced a quarter in which it outscored Los Angeles.

The Three-Point Battle Changed the Game

Three-point shooting deserves special attention because it provides one of the clearest explanations for the final margin.

Both teams attempted 34 three-pointers.

That makes the comparison unusually clean.

Utah made 7.

Los Angeles made 15.

The Lakers therefore converted eight additional three-point shots from the same number of attempts.

Eight extra made threes represent 24 additional points.

Utah did generate 50 points in the paint, but Los Angeles produced 60. The Lakers were therefore more efficient both outside and inside.

That combination is extremely difficult to defend.

Rebounding and Second-Chance Opportunities

Utah actually showed strength on the offensive glass.

The Jazz collected 17 offensive rebounds, six more than the Lakers.

Tshiebwe was the main reason. His nine offensive rebounds gave Utah repeated opportunities after missed shots.

However, Utah could not convert those extra possessions efficiently enough.

Los Angeles collected 38 defensive rebounds, allowing it to end possessions more often after Utah’s misses.

This is an important lesson when analyzing player statistics. A team can win a particular statistical category, such as offensive rebounds, and still lose comfortably if another category, such as shooting efficiency, has a much larger impact.

Assists and Offensive Structure

The Lakers finished with 37 assists.

Marcus Smart’s 10 assists were the team high, followed by LeBron James with 6.

Several other players also contributed to the passing attack. The result was an offense that did not depend on one player taking a large number of shots.

Utah finished with 25 assists.

Bez Mbeng led the Jazz with nine assists, while Cody Williams added six.

The Jazz had competent playmaking numbers, but the Lakers’ superior shooting meant their assists translated into more productive possessions.

The relationship between assists and shooting efficiency is especially important here. Passing alone does not create an advantage unless the resulting shots are converted.

Turnovers and Defensive Activity

Utah committed 16 turnovers, while Los Angeles committed 15.

That was not a huge difference.

However, Utah recorded 13 steals compared with the Lakers’ 12.

The Jazz also scored 26 points off turnovers, compared with 18 for Los Angeles.

Those numbers show that Utah did create some defensive disruption.

Yet the Jazz could not turn that pressure into enough overall offensive production.

This is another reason the final score should not be reduced to a simple narrative about one team playing harder. Utah generated turnovers and offensive rebounds, but the Lakers’ shooting efficiency and offensive execution outweighed those advantages.

Plus/Minus Leaders

Plus/minus can be useful when interpreted alongside the rest of the box score.

For Los Angeles, the leaders included:

• Rui Hachimura: +19
• LeBron James: +14
• Deandre Ayton: +13
• Marcus Smart: +13
• Bronny James: +13

Hachimura’s +19 was the highest on the Lakers.

For Utah, Blake Hinson had the best individual plus/minus at -8.

Oscar Tshiebwe finished at -15 despite scoring 29 points and grabbing 17 rebounds.

That contrast is revealing. Tshiebwe played extremely well individually, but basketball is a team sport, and his team was significantly outscored during his minutes.

Players Who Made the Biggest Difference

If the goal is to identify the most influential performances rather than simply list the highest scorers, several players stand out.

Rui Hachimura

Hachimura combined scoring efficiency, rebounding, perimeter shooting, and the best Lakers plus/minus.

Deandre Ayton

Ayton’s 10-for-14 shooting and 10 rebounds gave Los Angeles highly efficient interior production.

Dalton Knecht

His 5-for-6 three-point shooting was arguably the game’s biggest perimeter shooting performance.

Marcus Smart

Ten assists from a player who scored only five points show how valuable non-scoring contributions were to the Lakers.

Oscar Tshiebwe

Tshiebwe deserves recognition despite Utah’s loss. His 29 points and 17 rebounds were easily the Jazz’s strongest individual statistical performance.

What the Matchup Reveals About Both Teams

The game provides useful insight beyond the final score.

For Los Angeles, the biggest positive was offensive balance.

The Lakers received:

• Efficient interior scoring from Ayton
• Two-way production from Hachimura
• Playmaking from Smart and James
• Perimeter shooting from Knecht
• Bench scoring from several younger players

That distribution made the Lakers difficult to slow down.

For Utah, the most encouraging element was individual production from Tshiebwe and useful playmaking from Mbeng and Williams.

However, the 21% three-point shooting rate limited the team’s offensive ceiling.

Players Who Did Not Play

The official box score lists four Utah players as unavailable for the game:

• Kevin Love, DNP by coach’s decision
• Svi Mykhailiuk, DNP by coach’s decision
• Elijah Harkless, DNP due to a left hamstring strain
• Isaiah Collier, DNP due to a left hamstring strain

These notes matter when evaluating the complete game context.

A box score is not simply a list of players who appeared. Availability, minutes, and coaching decisions can all influence how a rotation performs.

What Fans Can Learn From the Box Score

A useful way to analyze a game like this is to avoid focusing only on points.

Start with five questions:

1. Which team shot more efficiently?
2. Which team created better shots?
3. Which players controlled rebounds?
4. Which players created opportunities for teammates?
5. Where did the biggest team-level statistical gap appear?

For this matchup, the answers point strongly toward Los Angeles.

The Lakers were better from the field, better from three, better at the free-throw line, better on total rebounds, and better in assists.

Utah did have advantages in offensive rebounds, steals, and points off turnovers, but those areas did not overcome the Lakers’ overall efficiency.

How to Read Player Stats More Accurately

Individual points are useful, but they should be the beginning of an analysis rather than the end.

Consider Oscar Tshiebwe.

His 29 points look excellent, and they were. His 17 rebounds make the performance even more impressive.

But the team still lost by 24 points.

Now consider Marcus Smart.

He scored only five points, which might appear insignificant if scoring is the only statistic being examined. Yet he produced 10 assists and finished +13.

The two examples show why a complete player-stat analysis should consider multiple categories.

A strong evaluation should include:

• Scoring volume
• Shooting efficiency
• Rebounding
• Assists
• Turnovers
• Defensive statistics
• Plus/minus
• Minutes played
• Team context

That approach provides a much more accurate picture of what actually happened.

Lakers vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways

The lakers vs utah jazz match player stats reveal a game controlled by Los Angeles through efficiency and balance.

The Lakers scored 131 points while shooting 55% from the field and 44% from three-point range.

Rui Hachimura and Deandre Ayton each scored 22 points and collected 10 rebounds.

LeBron James scored 18 points in 17 minutes while adding six assists and four rebounds.

Marcus Smart contributed 10 assists despite scoring only five points.

Dalton Knecht provided one of the game’s most efficient scoring displays with 17 points on 6-for-9 shooting, including 5-for-6 from three.

For Utah, Oscar Tshiebwe was the standout with 29 points and 17 rebounds.

Bez Mbeng nearly produced a double-double with 14 points and nine assists while adding five steals.

The biggest team-level difference came from shooting. Utah made only 7 of 34 three-point attempts, while Los Angeles made 15 of 34.

The final 131-107 score therefore reflected more than simple scoring volume. It reflected a consistent difference in shot quality, shot conversion, ball movement, and lineup efficiency.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who led the Lakers in scoring against the Jazz?

Rui Hachimura and Deandre Ayton both led the Lakers with 22 points. Hachimura also recorded 10 rebounds, while Ayton had 10 rebounds and three blocks.

Who led the Jazz in scoring?

Oscar Tshiebwe led Utah with 29 points. He also grabbed 17 rebounds and shot 12-for-17 from the field.

What was the final score between the Lakers and Jazz?

The Los Angeles Lakers defeated the Utah Jazz 131-107 on April 13, 2026.

How many three-pointers did the Lakers make?

The Lakers made 15 of 34 three-point attempts, shooting 44% from beyond the arc.

How many assists did Marcus Smart have?

Marcus Smart recorded 10 assists, which was the highest assist total for either team in the game.

Did the Lakers sweep the Jazz during the season?

Yes. The Lakers won all four meetings against the Jazz during the season, completing a 4-0 season series.

Conclusion

The lakers vs utah jazz match player stats provide a detailed picture of a Lakers team that finished its regular season with a convincing 131-107 victory.

Los Angeles won through efficiency rather than relying on one individual scoring explosion. Hachimura and Ayton each reached 22 points and 10 rebounds, James delivered 18 points and six assists in limited minutes, Smart created 10 assists, and Knecht supplied elite perimeter shooting from the bench.

Utah had its own standout performance from Tshiebwe, whose 29 points and 17 rebounds were among the strongest individual numbers of the game. Mbeng also contributed nine assists and five steals.

Ultimately, the biggest difference was shooting. The Lakers converted 55% of their field goals and 44% of their threes, while Utah finished at 44% and 21%, respectively. With both teams attempting 34 three-pointers, the Lakers’ eight additional made threes created a decisive advantage.

The game also demonstrated why player statistics should be viewed collectively. Scoring leaders, rebounders, playmakers, shooting efficiency, defensive activity, and plus/minus all contribute different pieces of the story. Taken together, those numbers explain why Los Angeles controlled the matchup from start to finish.