Las Vegas Raiders vs Seahawks Match Player Stats

The las vegas raiders vs seahawks match player stats from the 2025 NFL preseason opener tell the story of a 23-23 draw at Lumen Field, where both teams used the game to evaluate quarterbacks, running backs, receivers, defenders, and special teams players. The game was played in Seattle on August 7, 2025, with the recap published on August 8. Official NFL records list the matchup as a preseason Week 1 game in Seattle, while ESPN also records the final score as 23-23.

The result was unusual for a preseason game because neither side could finish the contest with a winning score. Las Vegas rallied in the second half after trailing 16-3 at halftime, while Seattle regained a seven-point lead late in the fourth quarter before the Raiders tied the game. Daniel Carlson then had a chance to win it from 55 yards, but Seattle blocked the attempt as time expired.

For readers searching for las vegas raiders vs seahawks match player stats, the most useful way to understand this game is not simply to look at the final score. The individual numbers show how the game changed as starters left, backups entered, and younger players received extended opportunities.

Las vegas raiders vs seahawks match player stats

The overall statistical picture was relatively balanced, but the teams reached their 23 points in different ways.

Las Vegas finished with 288 passing yards on 25 completions from 40 attempts. The Raiders averaged 7.4 yards per pass attempt and produced two passing touchdowns, although they also threw two interceptions.

Seattle finished with 198 passing yards on 18 completions from 32 attempts. The Seahawks averaged 6.5 yards per attempt and recorded one passing touchdown against one interception.

The rushing numbers moved in the opposite direction. Seattle ran for 170 yards on 32 attempts, averaging 5.3 yards per carry and scoring twice on the ground. Las Vegas managed 104 rushing yards on 26 attempts, an average of 4.0 yards per carry.

That contrast is important. The Raiders generated more through the air, while Seattle produced more consistently on the ground.

Team statistical snapshot

Category	Las Vegas Raiders	Seattle Seahawks
Final score	23	23
Passing	25/40, 288 yards	18/32, 198 yards
Passing average	7.4	6.5
Passing TDs	2	1
Interceptions thrown	2	1
Rushing	26 carries, 104 yards	32 carries, 170 yards
Rushing average	4.0	5.3
Rushing TDs	0	2
Receptions	25	18
Receiving yards	296	208
Receiving average	11.8	11.6
Defensive tackles	64	67
Sacks	1	1
Quarterback hits	2	7
Pass defenses	5	5
Fumbles	0	1

The most striking difference is that Las Vegas recorded 296 receiving yards compared with 208 for Seattle, while Seattle produced 170 rushing yards compared with 104 for Las Vegas.

In other words, the Raiders’ offensive production leaned heavily toward passing, while the Seahawks had a more balanced rushing-oriented statistical profile.

Aidan O’Connell passing performance

Aidan O’Connell received the largest passing workload for Las Vegas. He completed 18 of 30 attempts for 205 yards, averaging 6.8 yards per attempt.

He threw one touchdown and two interceptions, producing a 63.9 passer rating according to the game box score.

The volume is important when interpreting the numbers. O’Connell attempted 30 passes, substantially more than either Cam Miller or Geno Smith. His performance therefore represents a much larger portion of the Raiders’ offensive sample from this game.

His 205 yards accounted for more than two thirds of the Raiders’ total passing yardage.

At the same time, the two interceptions are a significant part of the evaluation. In a preseason environment, turnovers can be especially revealing because quarterbacks are often working with rotating personnel and less familiar combinations.

O’Connell’s final numbers were:

• 18 completions
• 30 attempts
• 205 passing yards
• 6.8 yards per attempt
• 1 touchdown
• 2 interceptions
• 63.9 passer rating

The statistics show both useful production and clear mistakes. His yardage total demonstrated an ability to move the ball, while the interceptions reduced the efficiency of otherwise productive drives.

Cam Miller provides an efficient passing sample

Cam Miller had a much smaller workload but produced an impressive statistical line.

He completed 6 of 7 passes for 76 yards, averaging 10.9 yards per attempt. He threw one touchdown and no interceptions, resulting in a 151.5 passer rating.

The efficiency stands out immediately.

Miller completed 85.7 percent of his passes and averaged nearly 11 yards every time he attempted a pass. However, it is important not to compare his rating directly with O’Connell’s without considering the difference in workload.

Seven attempts do not provide the same evaluation sample as 30 attempts.

That distinction matters when analyzing las vegas raiders vs seahawks match player stats. A short, efficient appearance can reveal positive traits, but it cannot answer every question about a quarterback’s ability to manage an entire game.

Miller’s final passing line was:

• 6 completions
• 7 attempts
• 76 yards
• 10.9 yards per attempt
• 1 touchdown
• 0 interceptions
• 151.5 passer rating

His performance was one of the cleaner passing samples on either team.

Geno Smith’s limited appearance

Geno Smith started the game for Seattle and completed 1 of 3 passes for 15 yards.

He recorded no touchdowns or interceptions and finished with a 50.7 passer rating.

The most important point is the limited sample size.

Smith attempted only three passes, so there is little statistical justification for drawing broad conclusions from his individual numbers in this particular game. His presence was nevertheless significant because Seattle’s quarterback rotation allowed the coaching staff to move quickly into evaluating Drew Lock and Jalen Milroe.

Drew Lock handles the largest Seattle quarterback workload

Drew Lock completed 12 of 22 passes for 147 yards, averaging 6.7 yards per attempt.

He threw one touchdown and one interception and finished with a 71.6 passer rating.

Lock’s 147 yards represented the majority of Seattle’s passing production.

His statistical profile was fairly different from Miller’s. Lock had considerably more attempts and therefore faced more opportunities to create both positive and negative plays.

His numbers were:

• 12 completions
• 22 attempts
• 147 yards
• 6.7 yards per attempt
• 1 touchdown
• 1 interception
• 71.6 passer rating

His touchdown helped Seattle’s passing attack, but the interception prevented a completely clean statistical outing.

Jalen Milroe combines passing and rushing ability

Jalen Milroe was one of the most interesting statistical players in the game because his contribution was not limited to passing.

He completed 6 of 10 passes for 61 yards, averaging 6.1 yards per attempt. He did not throw a touchdown or interception and finished with a 77.5 passer rating.

As a runner, however, Milroe added 38 yards on only three carries. That produced an outstanding 12.7 yards per carry, with a long run of 27 yards.

That rushing production gives additional context to his overall performance.

His combined contribution included:

• 6 of 10 passing
• 61 passing yards
• 6.1 yards per attempt
• 77.5 passer rating
• 3 rushing attempts
• 38 rushing yards
• 12.7 rushing average
• 27-yard rushing long

Milroe’s rushing efficiency was one of Seattle’s more notable individual numbers.

Las Vegas rushing attack

The Raiders ran the ball 26 times for 104 yards.

That produced an average of 4.0 yards per carry, but no rushing touchdowns.

The workload was distributed across multiple backs, which is common during preseason evaluation.

Chris Collier

Chris Collier carried nine times for 42 yards.

He averaged 4.7 yards per carry and recorded a 16-yard long. NFL’s player log confirms the same nine-carry, 42-yard line from this matchup.

Collier therefore accounted for a substantial share of the Raiders’ rushing attempts.

Dylan Laube

Dylan Laube produced one of the more efficient rushing averages among Raiders backs.

He carried five times for 34 yards, averaging 6.8 yards per attempt. His longest run covered 24 yards.

Although five attempts are a small sample, the 24-yard run significantly increased his average.

Raheem Mostert

Raheem Mostert received only one rushing attempt.

That carry went for 11 yards, giving him an 11.0-yard average.

The limited workload makes it difficult to draw conclusions from his individual rushing figure, but the play itself added positive yardage to the Raiders’ rushing total.

Seattle rushing attack

Seattle’s rushing numbers were stronger overall.

The Seahawks carried the ball 32 times for 170 yards, averaging 5.3 yards per carry and scoring two touchdowns.

Three players were especially important in the available statistics.

George Holani

George Holani was a major contributor.

He rushed seven times for 61 yards, averaging 8.7 yards per carry, with a 24-yard long and one touchdown.

He also caught one pass for 20 yards.

His rushing touchdown came on a 24-yard run in the first quarter and gave Seattle its early 7-0 advantage.

Holani’s 61 rushing yards were more than half of the Raiders’ individual rushing total from their leading listed rusher.

Jalen Milroe as a runner

Milroe’s three carries for 38 yards deserve attention again because they show how much his rushing ability added to Seattle’s offense.

His 27-yard run was Seattle’s longest rushing play among the listed player statistics.

Jacardia Wright

Jacardia Wright carried seven times for 34 yards.

He averaged 4.9 yards per carry and scored one rushing touchdown.

That gave Seattle multiple backs capable of producing positive yardage rather than relying on one runner throughout the game.

Receiving statistics

The receiving comparison provides another major contrast.

Las Vegas recorded 25 receptions for 296 yards, averaging 11.8 yards per reception.

Seattle recorded 18 receptions for 208 yards, averaging 11.6 yards per reception.

The average per catch was almost identical, but Las Vegas completed seven more receptions and accumulated 88 additional receiving yards.

Shedrick Jackson leads Raiders receivers

Shedrick Jackson produced one of the strongest receiving performances for Las Vegas.

He caught four passes for 76 yards and a touchdown.

His average was 19.0 yards per reception, and his longest catch went for 41 yards.

He was targeted four times, meaning he caught every pass thrown his way according to the supplied game statistics.

The combination of four receptions, 76 yards, and a touchdown made Jackson one of the most productive Raiders pass catchers.

Alex Bachman

Alex Bachman caught two passes for 36 yards.

He averaged 18.0 yards per reception and recorded a 33-yard reception.

His four targets gave him opportunities to contribute downfield even though his total reception count remained modest.

Phillip Dorsett II

Phillip Dorsett II recorded three receptions for 36 yards.

He averaged 12.0 yards per catch and had a 14-yard long.

NFL’s player log also records three receptions for 36 yards in this preseason matchup.

Seattle receiving production

Seattle’s receiving numbers were led by several different contributors.

Tory Horton caught three passes for 31 yards and one touchdown. He averaged 10.3 yards per reception and was targeted seven times.

Dareke Young had one reception for 31 yards. That single catch produced a 31.0-yard average.

George Holani added one reception for 20 yards.

These numbers illustrate how Seattle’s passing yardage was spread among its receivers and backs rather than concentrated in one high-volume target.

Defensive statistics

Defense played a major role in keeping the game close.

Las Vegas recorded 64 total tackles, including 43 solo tackles. The Raiders had one sack, one tackle for loss, five passes defended, and two quarterback hits.

Seattle recorded 67 tackles, including 38 solo tackles. The Seahawks also had one sack, five tackles for loss, five passes defended, and seven quarterback hits.

The quarterback-hit numbers stand out.

Seattle recorded seven quarterback hits compared with two for Las Vegas.

That does not automatically mean Seattle’s pass rush was superior throughout the game, because quarterback hits can occur on plays with different circumstances and the defensive personnel changed repeatedly. However, it does demonstrate that Seattle generated more recorded contact around Raiders quarterbacks.

Interceptions and turnover production

Turnovers were another defining element of the game.

Las Vegas recorded one interception.

Isaiah Pola-Mao was credited with the Raiders’ interception.

Seattle recorded two interceptions.

Josh Jobe returned one interception 28 yards, while Nehemiah Pritchett returned another eight yards.

The turnover difference is particularly interesting because Seattle also recovered a fumble, although the Seahawks were charged with one fumble that they recovered themselves.

Las Vegas had no fumbles recorded in the supplied statistics.

Overall, the Raiders threw two interceptions while Seattle threw one, but Seattle’s defense intercepted two Las Vegas passes. That defensive production helped offset the Raiders’ larger passing-yard total.

Daniel Carlson’s kicking performance

Daniel Carlson handled the Raiders’ field-goal duties.

He made three of five field-goal attempts, including a longest successful attempt of 56 yards. He also converted both extra-point attempts.

His total was 11 points.

Carlson’s late-game sequence became one of the defining moments of the contest. He made a 51-yard field goal with approximately a minute remaining to help bring Las Vegas level, according to the Associated Press recap carried by ESPN.

He then attempted a 55-yard game-winning field goal at the end of regulation.

Seattle’s Jalan Gaines blocked the attempt, preserving the 23-23 tie.

This sequence demonstrates why special teams statistics deserve attention when analyzing a close NFL game.

Jason Myers’ kicking statistics

Seattle kicker Jason Myers went 1-for-1 on field goals.

His successful attempt covered 48 yards.

He also converted two of three extra-point attempts and scored five points.

Compared with Carlson, Myers had fewer field-goal opportunities, but his single field-goal attempt was successful.

Punting and field position

Punting was another area where the statistical profile differed.

Las Vegas punted twice for 83 yards, averaging 41.5 yards per punt. The longest punt was 52 yards, and one punt was placed inside the 20-yard line.

Seattle punted four times for 222 yards, averaging 55.5 yards per punt. The longest went 77 yards.

The raw average strongly favors Seattle’s punting production, although the number of attempts was also twice as high.

Seattle had one touchback and no punts recorded inside the 20-yard line in the supplied statistics.

Las Vegas had one punt inside the 20.

Return game

Las Vegas recorded two kickoff returns for 61 yards, averaging 30.5 yards per return. Its longest kickoff return was 35 yards.

Seattle recorded three kickoff returns for 51 yards, averaging 17.0 yards per return.

On punt returns, Las Vegas had two returns for 20 yards, averaging 10.0 yards.

Seattle recorded one punt return for five yards.

The return numbers show that Las Vegas created more average kickoff-return yardage despite receiving fewer kickoffs.

How the game changed by quarter

The scoring pattern helps explain why the final statistical totals were so close.

Seattle led 7-0 after the first quarter.

The Seahawks extended the advantage in the second quarter, taking a 16-3 lead into halftime.

Las Vegas responded with seven points in the third quarter while Seattle was held scoreless.

The fourth quarter became the most competitive period. Las Vegas scored 13 points, while Seattle answered with seven.

The Raiders eventually tied the game at 23, and the final field-goal attempt was blocked.

The official NFL game page records the quarter-by-quarter scoring as 0-3-7-13 for Las Vegas and 7-9-0-7 for Seattle.

That scoring pattern reveals something the final score alone cannot show: Seattle controlled the first half, while Las Vegas produced the stronger second-half scoring response.

What the passing numbers tell us

The passing statistics reveal a clear difference in offensive emphasis.

Las Vegas threw 40 team passes compared with Seattle’s 32.

The Raiders also produced 288 passing yards compared with 198 for Seattle.

That 90-yard difference is substantial.

However, passing volume alone does not explain the game because Seattle compensated with 170 rushing yards.

The result was an offensive balance that looked different on each side:

Las Vegas

• More passing attempts
• More passing yards
• More receptions
• More receiving yards
• Two passing touchdowns
• Two interceptions

Seattle

• More rushing attempts
• More rushing yards
• Better rushing average
• Two rushing touchdowns
• One passing touchdown
• One interception

This is one of the most useful takeaways from the las vegas raiders vs seahawks match player stats. The teams did not use identical statistical routes to reach 23 points.

What the rushing numbers tell us

Seattle’s 5.3 yards per carry compared with Las Vegas’s 4.0.

The Seahawks gained 66 more rushing yards despite making only six additional rushing attempts.

That difference indicates that Seattle generated more efficiency on the ground during the game.

George Holani’s 61 yards on seven carries played a major role.

Milroe’s 38 yards on three carries also had a meaningful impact on Seattle’s rushing efficiency.

Las Vegas had useful contributions from Laube and Collier, but its overall rushing output did not match Seattle’s.

Why preseason statistics need context

Preseason player statistics are valuable, but they should be interpreted differently from regular-season statistics.

The biggest reason is playing time.

Teams often rotate quarterbacks, running backs, receivers, offensive linemen, defensive backs, and pass rushers throughout the game. A player may face a different quality of opponent depending on when he enters.

A quarterback’s final rating can therefore be informative without being a complete measure of his performance.

The same applies to running backs.

A 24-yard run can dramatically change a player’s average if he only receives five carries. That is exactly why Laube’s five attempts for 34 yards should be viewed differently from a regular-season workload of 20 carries.

The best approach is to examine several categories together:

1. Volume
2. Efficiency
3. Explosive plays
4. Touchdowns
5. Turnovers
6. Situational contribution
7. Playing time

This produces a more reliable interpretation than focusing on one headline number.

Players whose statistics deserve closer attention

Several players produced numbers that stand out from the box score.

Cam Miller

His 6-of-7 passing line for 76 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions produced a 151.5 passer rating.

Shedrick Jackson

Four catches for 76 yards and one touchdown gave him a 19.0-yard reception average.

Dylan Laube

Five carries for 34 yards included a 24-yard long and resulted in a 6.8-yard rushing average.

George Holani

Seven carries for 61 yards and one touchdown produced an 8.7-yard rushing average.

Jalen Milroe

His 61 passing yards were supplemented by 38 rushing yards on only three attempts.

Daniel Carlson

He scored 11 points and made three field goals, but his final 55-yard attempt was blocked.

These statistics provide a more detailed picture than simply saying that the game ended in a tie.

Comparing quarterback efficiency

A basic quarterback comparison looks like this:

Quarterback	Comp/Att	Yards	YPA	TD	INT	Rating
Aidan O’Connell	18/30	205	6.8	1	2	63.9
Cam Miller	6/7	76	10.9	1	0	151.5
Geno Smith	1/3	15	5.0	0	0	50.7
Drew Lock	12/22	147	6.7	1	1	71.6
Jalen Milroe	6/10	61	6.1	0	0	77.5

The table should not be interpreted as a simple ranking because the quarterbacks had very different workloads.

O’Connell and Lock handled much larger samples than Miller, Smith, or Milroe.

Miller’s rating was the highest, but it came on seven attempts.

Milroe’s passing rating was better than Lock’s despite throwing for fewer yards, partly because he avoided an interception and completed a higher percentage of his attempts.

Comparing the running backs

The leading rushing figures were:

Player	Team	Carries	Yards	Average	Long	TD
George Holani	Seattle	7	61	8.7	24	1
Chris Collier	Las Vegas	9	42	4.7	16	0
Jalen Milroe	Seattle	3	38	12.7	27	0
Jacardia Wright	Seattle	7	34	4.9	11	1
Dylan Laube	Las Vegas	5	34	6.8	24	0
Raheem Mostert	Las Vegas	1	11	11.0	11	0

The table again demonstrates why volume and efficiency should be considered together.

Holani had both meaningful volume and strong efficiency.

Milroe had the highest rushing average among the listed players, but only three carries.

Collier received the most carries among the listed Las Vegas backs.

Comparing the receiving production

Las Vegas generated more total receiving yardage.

Its 25 receptions produced 296 yards, while Seattle’s 18 receptions produced 208 yards.

The leading individual numbers included:

Player	Team	Receptions	Yards	Average	Long	TD
Shedrick Jackson	Las Vegas	4	76	19.0	41	1
Alex Bachman	Las Vegas	2	36	18.0	33	0
Phillip Dorsett II	Las Vegas	3	36	12.0	14	0
Tory Horton	Seattle	3	31	10.3	13	1
Dareke Young	Seattle	1	31	31.0	31	0
George Holani	Seattle	1	20	20.0	20	0

Jackson’s four catches for 76 yards stand out because he combined volume with explosive production.

Young’s single 31-yard reception also deserves context because one catch can produce a high average without representing a large receiving workload.

The significance of the final field-goal sequence

The ending is an important part of the game’s statistical story.

Las Vegas tied the game late through Carlson’s 51-yard field goal.

With the score level, the Raiders then attempted a 55-yard field goal as time expired.

Jalan Gaines blocked the attempt.

That meant the game ended 23-23 instead of producing a winner. ESPN’s AP-based recap identifies the blocked kick as the decisive final sequence.

This is also why a final-score-only analysis misses some of the game’s most important details.

The Raiders had the opportunity to win after their second-half comeback, but Seattle’s special teams prevented the final kick from reaching the uprights.

How to interpret the game for player evaluation

The statistics are most useful when viewed as pieces of evidence rather than final judgments.

• For quarterbacks, completion percentage and passer rating provide useful information, but attempts, turnovers, and supporting personnel also matter.
• For running backs, yards per carry can identify explosive production, but workload is essential for context.
• For receivers, total yards and touchdowns matter, but targets and catch rate can reveal how often a player was involved.
• For defenders, tackles alone do not describe the full performance. Sacks, tackles for loss, quarterback hits, pass defenses, and interceptions provide additional context.
• For special teams players, field goals, punts, returns, and blocked kicks can directly affect the final score.

The August 2025 matchup demonstrates all of these principles.

Official statistical reference

For readers who want to cross-check player-level numbers, the NFL’s official game center provides the game’s official matchup information and scoring breakdown.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score of the Raiders vs Seahawks preseason game?

The Las Vegas Raiders and Seattle Seahawks finished tied 23-23 in the 2025 preseason opener at Lumen Field.

Who was the leading Raiders passer?

Aidan O’Connell led Las Vegas with 18 completions on 30 attempts for 205 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions.

Who was the leading Seahawks rusher?

George Holani led Seattle with seven carries for 61 yards and one rushing touchdown.

How did Jalen Milroe perform?

Milroe completed 6 of 10 passes for 61 yards and added 38 rushing yards on three carries. He did not throw a touchdown or interception.

Who led the Raiders in receiving?

Shedrick Jackson led the Raiders with four receptions for 76 yards and one touchdown.

Why did the game end in a tie?

Las Vegas tied the game late with a field goal, but Daniel Carlson’s potential 55-yard game-winning attempt was blocked by Seattle as time expired.

Conclusion

The las vegas raiders vs seahawks match player stats from this preseason matchup show two offenses that produced their points in very different ways.

Las Vegas generated 288 passing yards and 296 receiving yards while Seattle produced 170 rushing yards and two rushing touchdowns. The Raiders’ passing attack created more total yardage through the air, while Seattle’s ground game delivered stronger rushing efficiency.

At quarterback, O’Connell handled the largest workload for Las Vegas, while Lock did the same for Seattle. Miller produced an efficient limited appearance, and Milroe added an important rushing dimension to his passing contribution.

Among the skill-position players, Jackson’s 76 receiving yards and touchdown, Holani’s 61 rushing yards and touchdown, Laube’s 6.8-yard rushing average, and Milroe’s 38 rushing yards all stand out in different ways.

The defensive statistics also reveal a close contest. Both teams recorded one sack and five passes defended, while Seattle registered seven quarterback hits compared with two for Las Vegas. Turnovers were also significant, with Seattle’s defense producing two interceptions.

The final moments ultimately defined the result. Carlson helped Las Vegas erase the late deficit, but Seattle’s blocked field goal prevented the Raiders from completing the comeback with a victory.

For anyone studying this matchup, the most useful lesson is that preseason box scores require context. Workload, efficiency, explosive plays, turnovers, and situational moments all contribute to understanding what happened on the field. The 23-23 final score captures the outcome, but the individual statistics explain how the game reached that result.