Dallas mavericks vs utah jazz match player stats
The dallas mavericks vs utah jazz match player stats from January 9, 2026, reveal how a closely contested NBA game was decided by ball security, defensive pressure, and timely scoring. The Utah Jazz defeated the Dallas Mavericks 116-114 at the Delta Center in Salt Lake City, earning a narrow two-point victory in front of 18,186 spectators. Despite Dallas shooting an impressive 52% from the field and receiving strong scoring performances from Cooper Flagg, Klay Thompson, and Anthony Davis, Utah found a way to protect its advantage. Lauri Markkanen led the Jazz with 33 points, while Keyonte George contributed 19 points and seven assists. The most important statistical difference, however, came from turnovers. Utah committed only nine compared with Dallas’ 20, allowing the home team to create more defensive opportunities and control crucial possessions throughout the game.
This matchup offers an interesting example of why shooting percentages alone do not determine basketball results. Dallas made 44 of 85 field-goal attempts, compared with Utah’s 47 of 95. The Mavericks also converted 42% of their three-point attempts. Nevertheless, the Jazz compensated for their lower shooting efficiency from beyond the arc through better ball protection, more steals, and consistent offensive movement.
For anyone examining the individual performances, team statistics, scoring patterns, and overall match impact, this game provides several important details worth understanding. The following analysis examines the final score, leading performers, quarter-by-quarter results, team comparisons, and the statistical factors that shaped Utah’s victory.
Dallas Mavericks vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The January 9 meeting between Dallas and Utah was a competitive contest that remained undecided until the closing stages. Both teams produced effective offensive stretches, but their approaches to creating scoring opportunities were noticeably different.
Dallas relied heavily on efficient shooting and contributions from its leading players. Utah combined balanced scoring with better ball movement and defensive activity.
Here are the confirmed match details.
| Match Information | Details |
| Match | Utah Jazz vs Dallas Mavericks |
| Date | January 9, 2026 |
| Competition | NBA |
| Final Score | Utah Jazz 116-114 Dallas Mavericks |
| Winning Team | Utah Jazz |
| Losing Team | Dallas Mavericks |
| Venue | Delta Center |
| Location | Salt Lake City, Utah |
| Attendance | 18,186 |
| Match Status | Final |
| Dallas Record | 14-24 |
| Utah Record | 13-24 |
| Dallas Away Record | 4-14 |
| Utah Home Record | 9-11 |
| Season Series | Utah leads 2-0 |
The final result was particularly interesting because Dallas entered the contest with a better overall record, while Utah had the advantage of playing at home.
The Mavericks had a 14-24 record before the matchup, compared with Utah’s 13-24 record. Dallas had struggled on the road, holding a 4-14 away record. Utah’s home record stood at 9-11.
Those records provide useful context, but the actual result was determined by what happened during the 48 minutes of basketball.
Utah finished with 116 points, two more than Dallas. The Jazz also won the season-series matchup 2-0 according to the supplied matchup summary.
Why the Final Score Was So Close
A two-point difference usually indicates that several possessions had the potential to change the outcome.
Dallas had enough offensive production to win. Its three leading scorers combined for 70 points:
- Cooper Flagg: 26 points
- Klay Thompson: 23 points
- Anthony Davis: 21 points
Utah also received an important contribution from its leading players. Lauri Markkanen scored 33 points, while Keyonte George added 19 and Brice Sensabaugh contributed 14.
The difference was not simply the number of points scored by individual players. Utah created more opportunities through defensive pressure and avoided wasting possessions.
That distinction becomes especially important when analyzing the complete team statistics.
Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring Breakdown
The scoring progression provides a clearer picture of how the contest developed.
Utah established an early advantage, Dallas responded during the third quarter, and the Jazz produced enough offense in the fourth to maintain their narrow lead.
| Quarter | Dallas Mavericks | Utah Jazz |
| First Quarter | 29 | 34 |
| Second Quarter | 26 | 24 |
| Third Quarter | 34 | 30 |
| Fourth Quarter | 25 | 28 |
| Final Score | 114 | 116 |
First Quarter: Utah Establishes Early Control
Utah opened the game with 34 points, creating a five-point advantage over Dallas, which finished the opening period with 29.
The Jazz benefited from an effective offensive start and established an early scoring rhythm.
For Dallas, the challenge was preventing Utah from creating too much separation. Although the Mavericks scored 29 points, their defense allowed the home team to reach 34.
A five-point deficit is not particularly difficult to overcome in the NBA, but it can influence how a team approaches the remaining quarters.
Dallas needed to improve its defensive execution while maintaining its offensive efficiency.
Second Quarter: Dallas Reduces the Difference
The Mavericks responded during the second quarter.
Dallas scored 26 points, while Utah managed 24. This allowed the visitors to recover two points and enter halftime with the deficit reduced to three.
The scoring sequence showed that Dallas remained competitive despite Utah’s stronger opening period.
The Mavericks were finding opportunities to score, and their overall shooting efficiency eventually reflected that offensive production.
Utah, meanwhile, maintained its advantage by avoiding a major scoring collapse.
The second quarter was important because it prevented Dallas from falling further behind before halftime.
Third Quarter: Dallas Produces Its Strongest Scoring Period
The third quarter was Dallas’ highest-scoring period of the game.
The Mavericks recorded 34 points, compared with Utah’s 30. That four-point advantage reduced the Jazz’s lead and brought the contest closer.
Dallas demonstrated that its offensive system could generate consistent scoring against Utah.
Cooper Flagg’s contribution was particularly important to the Mavericks’ overall offensive performance. He eventually finished with 26 points and eight assists.
Klay Thompson also provided significant scoring support, finishing with 23 points.
However, the Mavericks’ improved scoring did not eliminate their possession-management problems.
The turnover difference remained a major issue and became increasingly important as the game approached its conclusion.
Fourth Quarter: Utah Protects Its Two-Point Advantage
The final quarter produced 28 points for Utah and 25 for Dallas.
The Jazz won the period by three points, which was enough to secure the overall result.
Dallas had scored more efficiently during the third quarter, but Utah responded with a stronger closing period.
The Mavericks were unable to generate the additional points needed to move ahead.
Utah’s ability to protect the ball was an important part of its closing performance. Finishing with only nine turnovers across the entire game gave the Jazz more opportunities to complete possessions without losing control.
The final score of 116-114 reflected how narrow the difference was between the teams.
Dallas Mavericks Player Stats and Individual Performances
Dallas received strong offensive contributions from three leading players.
Cooper Flagg finished as the team’s leading scorer, while Klay Thompson and Anthony Davis provided additional scoring support.
The Mavericks also received important contributions in playmaking and rebounding.
Cooper Flagg: 26 Points, 8 Assists, and 3 Steals
Cooper Flagg delivered one of the most complete statistical performances for Dallas.
He finished with:
| Statistical Category | Performance |
| Points | 26 |
| Assists | 8 |
| Steals | 3 |
Flagg led the Mavericks in scoring, assists, and steals.
His 26 points demonstrated his ability to contribute significantly to the team’s offensive production. He was also responsible for creating opportunities for teammates, finishing with eight assists.
The assist total is especially important when evaluating his overall contribution.
Scoring tells us how many points a player produces directly, but assists help explain how that player influences the offense beyond individual shooting.
Flagg’s eight assists made him Dallas’ leading playmaker.
His three steals also showed his defensive involvement. Steals can disrupt offensive possessions, create transition opportunities, and change the momentum of a close game.
However, Dallas needed more consistent possession management from the entire roster. Even with Flagg’s contributions, the Mavericks finished with 20 turnovers.
His performance was productive, but it was not enough to overcome the team’s broader statistical disadvantages.
Klay Thompson: 23 Points
Klay Thompson provided another important scoring performance.
He finished with 23 points, making him Dallas’ second-highest scorer.
Thompson’s offensive contribution helped the Mavericks maintain pressure on Utah throughout the contest.
His scoring was particularly valuable because Dallas needed multiple players to contribute rather than relying entirely on one offensive option.
The Mavericks eventually finished with:
- 44 successful field goals.
- 15 successful three-point shots.
- 11 successful free throws.
Their 42% three-point shooting reflected their ability to convert opportunities from beyond the arc.
Thompson’s 23-point performance formed an important part of that overall offensive output.
His contribution also demonstrated the importance of experienced scoring options in a competitive game.
Although the supplied match data does not provide his individual shooting breakdown, his total points confirm that he was one of Dallas’ most productive offensive players.
Anthony Davis: 21 Points and 11 Rebounds
Anthony Davis contributed 21 points and 11 rebounds.
His performance gave Dallas an important presence in both scoring and rebounding.
The 11 rebounds made him the Mavericks’ leading rebounder.
Rebounding is a major part of controlling basketball possessions. Defensive rebounds prevent opponents from creating additional scoring opportunities, while offensive rebounds can extend a team’s possession.
Davis’ double-digit rebound total demonstrated his importance in the paint.
His 21 points also provided valuable offensive support behind Flagg and Thompson.
Dallas finished with 47 total rebounds, five more than Utah’s 42.
Davis’ contribution was important to that overall rebounding advantage.
However, rebounding superiority did not translate into a victory because Utah created more opportunities through turnovers and steals.
This is an important distinction when evaluating his performance. Individual production can be excellent even when the team’s final result is disappointing.
Other Dallas Players and Starting Lineup
The supplied matchup information identifies the following Dallas starters:
- Anthony Davis
- Daniel Gafford
- Naji Marshall
- Cooper Flagg
- Max Christie
The Mavericks also had several players available from the bench:
- Caleb Martin
- Klay Thompson
- Brandon Williams
- Ryan Nembhard
- Dwight Powell
- D’Angelo Russell
- Jaden Hardy
The available data confirms these players as part of the reported starting and bench groups, but it does not provide complete individual minutes, shooting percentages, or statistical lines for every player.
That distinction matters when publishing player statistics. A reliable match report should separate confirmed individual figures from team-level numbers rather than assigning unsupported performances to players.
The three leading scorers nevertheless provide a clear picture of Dallas’ offensive production.
Utah Jazz Player Stats and Individual Performances
Utah’s victory featured a strong scoring performance from Lauri Markkanen and valuable contributions from Keyonte George and Brice Sensabaugh.
The Jazz also benefited from Kevin Love’s rebounding and their overall defensive activity.
Lauri Markkanen: 33 Points
Lauri Markkanen was Utah’s leading scorer with 33 points.
He produced the highest individual scoring total recorded in the supplied match statistics.
His performance was important because Dallas had several players capable of producing significant offensive numbers.
Markkanen helped Utah maintain its scoring output and finish with 116 points.
His 33 points also represented a seven-point difference over Dallas’ leading scorer, Cooper Flagg.
The scoring comparison is particularly interesting:
| Player | Team | Points |
| Lauri Markkanen | Utah Jazz | 33 |
| Cooper Flagg | Dallas Mavericks | 26 |
| Klay Thompson | Dallas Mavericks | 23 |
| Anthony Davis | Dallas Mavericks | 21 |
| Keyonte George | Utah Jazz | 19 |
| Brice Sensabaugh | Utah Jazz | 14 |
Markkanen’s performance gave Utah an important individual scoring advantage.
However, his contribution should not be considered in isolation. Utah also needed consistent offensive involvement from its supporting players to reach the final total.
Keyonte George: 19 Points and 7 Assists
Keyonte George delivered a valuable contribution on both ends of the court.
His confirmed statistics included:
| Statistical Category | Performance |
| Points | 19 |
| Assists | 7 |
| Steals | 3 |
George finished as Utah’s second-highest scorer and leading playmaker.
His seven assists helped the Jazz distribute the basketball and create opportunities for teammates.
This was important against a Dallas team that recorded 30 assists.
Utah finished with 32 assists, giving the home team a two-assist advantage.
George’s contribution also extended to defense.
He recorded three steals, matching Cooper Flagg’s individual total.
Those defensive plays formed part of Utah’s overall advantage in steals.
His performance demonstrated the value of a player who can contribute through scoring, passing, and defensive pressure.
Brice Sensabaugh: 14 Points
Brice Sensabaugh finished with 14 points, making him Utah’s third-highest scorer.
His contribution helped provide additional scoring behind Markkanen and George.
In close games, supporting scorers can be extremely important.
When an opponent focuses defensive attention on the leading offensive player, other players must take advantage of available opportunities.
Sensabaugh’s 14 points added useful production to Utah’s offensive effort.
His contribution also helped the Jazz avoid becoming too dependent on one or two players.
Kevin Love: 10 Rebounds
Kevin Love finished as Utah’s leading rebounder with 10 rebounds.
His performance was important because Dallas had a five-rebound advantage in the overall team statistics.
The Mavericks collected 47 rebounds, compared with Utah’s 42.
Despite losing the team rebounding comparison, the Jazz still benefited from Love’s individual work on the boards.
A player’s rebounding contribution should be evaluated within the context of the complete team performance.
Utah did not need to dominate every statistical category to win.
Instead, the Jazz produced advantages in more decisive areas, particularly turnovers and steals.
Other Utah Players and Starting Lineup
The supplied matchup data identifies these Utah starters:
- Kevin Love
- Lauri Markkanen
- Cody Williams
- Brice Sensabaugh
- Keyonte George
The reported bench players were:
- Kyle Anderson
- Kyle Filipowski
- Taylor Hendricks
- Isaiah Collier
- Walter Clayton Jr.
- Oscar Tshiebwe
- Svi Mykhailiuk
The available statistics identify the leading individual performers but do not provide complete box-score figures for every member of the rotation.
It is therefore more accurate to focus on confirmed player contributions instead of estimating unreported points, rebounds, assists, or minutes.
Complete Team Statistics Comparison
The team comparison explains why Utah won despite Dallas recording a higher field-goal percentage.
Both teams had productive offensive performances, but their efficiency and possession management differed.
| Statistical Category | Dallas Mavericks | Utah Jazz |
| Points | 114 | 116 |
| Field Goals | 44/85 | 47/95 |
| Field-Goal Percentage | 52% | 49% |
| Three-Pointers | 15/36 | 13/41 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 42% | 32% |
| Free Throws | 11/13 | 9/14 |
| Free-Throw Percentage | 85% | 64% |
| Total Rebounds | 47 | 42 |
| Assists | 30 | 32 |
| Turnovers | 20 | 9 |
| Steals | 4 | 11 |
| Blocks | 2 | 3 |
Several important observations emerge from this comparison.
Dallas Had Better Shooting Efficiency
The Mavericks finished with a 52% field-goal percentage.
Utah recorded 49%.
Dallas also made 42% of its three-point attempts, compared with Utah’s 32%.
The difference from beyond the arc was especially notable.
Dallas converted 15 of 36 attempts, while Utah made 13 of 41.
That means Dallas made two additional three-pointers despite attempting five fewer shots.
The Mavericks also converted 85% of their free throws.
Utah’s free-throw percentage was 64%.
From a conventional shooting-efficiency perspective, Dallas produced several advantages.
Yet those advantages were not enough to secure the win.
Utah Had Better Possession Management
The most significant statistical difference was turnovers.
Dallas committed 20 turnovers, while Utah committed only nine.
That created an 11-turnover difference.
In basketball, a turnover ends an offensive possession without producing a shot attempt.
When a team repeatedly loses possession, it reduces its opportunities to score and can give the opponent additional chances to attack.
Utah’s nine turnovers indicated much better ball security.
Dallas’ 20 turnovers represented a substantial problem, particularly in a game decided by only two points.
The Jazz did not need to shoot better from every area of the court. They simply needed to avoid wasting as many possessions.
Utah Created More Defensive Disruptions
The steals comparison also favored the Jazz.
Utah recorded 11 steals, compared with Dallas’ four.
That was a seven-steal advantage.
The relationship between steals and turnovers is particularly relevant here.
Utah’s defensive activity helped create additional possessions while Dallas struggled to protect the ball.
The combination of 11 steals and only nine turnovers illustrates the Jazz’s ability to influence possession control.
This was one of the clearest reasons the home team managed to win.
Utah Also Had More Assists
The Jazz finished with 32 assists, while Dallas recorded 30.
Although the difference was relatively small, it indicates that Utah produced slightly more assisted scoring.
Assists are useful when examining offensive cooperation.
A team with strong passing can create better opportunities by moving defenders, finding open teammates, and avoiding predictable offensive possessions.
Both teams demonstrated effective ball movement, but Utah held a narrow advantage.
The Biggest Reason Utah Won: Turnovers and Steals
The most important lesson from this matchup is that shooting efficiency and possession efficiency are not the same thing.
Dallas had the better shooting percentages in several major categories.
The Mavericks also collected more rebounds and made more three-pointers.
Nevertheless, Utah won.
Why?
The answer becomes clearer when examining turnovers and steals together.
Dallas committed 20 turnovers. Utah committed only nine.
Utah also recorded 11 steals, while Dallas managed four.
These numbers reveal a major difference in how the teams handled possession.
Understanding the Cost of Turnovers
A turnover does not always result in an immediate opponent basket.
However, it removes the opportunity for the team committing the mistake to complete its offensive possession.
Repeated turnovers can have several effects:
- They reduce the number of available shooting opportunities.
- They give the opposing team additional possession opportunities.
- They interrupt offensive rhythm.
- They can create transition scoring chances.
- They increase defensive pressure on the team making mistakes.
Dallas’ 20 turnovers were particularly costly because the final margin was only two points.
It is impossible to identify the exact number of points directly produced by those turnovers without a detailed play-by-play breakdown.
However, the statistical difference clearly identifies ball security as a major area that separated the teams.
Why Steals Matter in a Close Game
Utah’s 11 steals showed how actively the Jazz disrupted Dallas’ offensive possessions.
A steal can produce more than a defensive statistic.
It can also change the pace of a game, create a transition opportunity, and prevent the opponent from attempting a shot.
The Jazz recorded seven more steals than Dallas.
When combined with the turnover comparison, that advantage becomes even more significant.
The Mavericks needed to protect the ball more effectively to make their shooting efficiency count.
Shooting Efficiency: Why Dallas’ Better Percentages Were Not Enough
Dallas’ shooting performance was one of the strongest aspects of its game.
The Mavericks converted 44 of 85 field-goal attempts, producing a 52% field-goal percentage.
Utah made 47 of 95 attempts, finishing at 49%.
Dallas also made 15 three-pointers.
Utah made 13.
These numbers suggest that Dallas was capable of generating efficient scoring opportunities.
However, a team’s shooting percentage does not account for every possession-related factor.
A team can shoot efficiently when it gets a shot attempt but still lose because it does not create enough successful possessions.
Three-Point Shooting Comparison
| Category | Dallas | Utah |
| Three-Pointers Made | 15 | 13 |
| Three-Pointers Attempted | 36 | 41 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 42% | 32% |
Dallas had a clear advantage from long range.
The Mavericks made two more three-pointers while attempting five fewer shots.
This was a significant offensive advantage.
Utah, however, did not need to match Dallas’ three-point percentage to win.
The Jazz found other ways to produce points and maintain possession.
Free-Throw Performance
Dallas also performed better from the free-throw line.
The Mavericks converted 11 of 13 attempts, while Utah made nine of 14.
Dallas’ 85% conversion rate was substantially higher than Utah’s 64%.
Free throws are important because they provide scoring opportunities without requiring a field-goal attempt.
The difference was two made free throws in Dallas’ favor.
Yet the Mavericks still lost by two points.
This demonstrates how multiple statistical categories must be considered together when evaluating a basketball game.
Rebounding and Playmaking Analysis
Rebounding and assists provide additional insight into the different approaches used by both teams.
Dallas controlled the rebounding comparison, while Utah recorded more assists.
Rebounding Comparison
Dallas collected 47 rebounds.
Utah finished with 42.
The Mavericks therefore recorded five more rebounds than the Jazz.
Anthony Davis led Dallas with 11 rebounds, while Kevin Love led Utah with 10.
Rebounding can influence how many opportunities a team receives during a game.
Defensive rebounds complete possessions by preventing opponents from getting second chances.
Offensive rebounds allow teams to extend their possessions and attempt additional shots.
Although Dallas won the overall rebounding comparison, the available team data does not separate offensive and defensive rebounds.
It would therefore be inaccurate to claim that the Mavericks specifically dominated either category.
What can be established is that Dallas collected more total rebounds but did not convert that advantage into a victory.
Assists Comparison
| Team | Total Assists | Leading Playmaker |
| Dallas Mavericks | 30 | Cooper Flagg, 8 |
| Utah Jazz | 32 | Keyonte George, 7 |
The Jazz finished with two more assists.
Cooper Flagg led all reported players in assists with eight.
Keyonte George was Utah’s leading playmaker with seven.
Both teams showed the ability to involve teammates in offensive possessions.
However, Utah’s slightly higher assist total combined with its lower turnover count suggests a more controlled offensive performance.
The distinction is important.
Good ball movement is valuable, but it becomes even more effective when a team can complete possessions without losing the basketball.
Defensive Performance: Steals, Blocks, and Overall Impact
The defensive statistics also reveal a difference between the two teams.
| Defensive Category | Dallas Mavericks | Utah Jazz |
| Steals | 4 | 11 |
| Blocks | 2 | 3 |
Utah recorded seven more steals and one more block.
The Jazz therefore had an advantage in both listed defensive categories.
Utah’s Defensive Pressure
The 11 steals were especially important.
They indicate that Utah was able to disrupt Dallas’ offensive possessions through defensive activity.
That advantage was consistent with the turnover comparison.
Dallas finished with 20 turnovers, which created a significant challenge for its offense.
Utah’s defense did not need to prevent every successful shot.
Instead, creating additional mistakes and limiting wasted possessions helped the team remain competitive.
Dallas’ Defensive Contributions
Dallas recorded four steals and two blocks.
The Mavericks still produced defensive plays, but their totals were lower than Utah’s.
Cooper Flagg led Dallas with three steals, demonstrating his contribution to the defensive effort.
The team’s overall numbers, however, show that the Mavericks struggled to create the same level of disruption as Utah.
Why Defensive Statistics Need Context
Steals and blocks are useful indicators, but they do not explain every defensive responsibility.
A player may defend effectively without recording a steal or block.
Positioning, communication, contesting shots, and preventing penetration are also important.
The available box-score information does not provide complete defensive tracking data.
Therefore, the most reliable conclusion is that Utah had a clear statistical advantage in recorded steals and blocks, while the full defensive impact requires more detailed information.
What the Result Reveals About Both Teams
The January 9 contest offers several useful observations about the strengths and weaknesses displayed by both teams.
Dallas showed that it could score efficiently against Utah.
The Mavericks also demonstrated strong individual production from their leading players.
However, their turnover total limited the value of those offensive advantages.
Utah demonstrated a different type of strength.
The Jazz did not lead in field-goal percentage, three-point percentage, free-throw percentage, or total rebounds.
Instead, they won through better possession management and defensive activity.
What Dallas Did Well
The Mavericks had several positive statistical outcomes.
- Strong field-goal efficiency
Dallas shot 52% from the field, compared with Utah’s 49%.
- Effective three-point shooting
The Mavericks made 15 three-pointers at a 42% rate.
- Productive leading scorers
Flagg, Thompson, and Davis combined for 70 points.
- Rebounding advantage
Dallas collected 47 rebounds, five more than Utah.
- Strong free-throw conversion
The Mavericks converted 85% of their free-throw attempts.
These numbers show that Dallas had the offensive production and rebounding needed to compete.
What Dallas Needed to Improve
The most obvious concern was ball security.
Twenty turnovers created too many lost possessions.
Dallas also recorded fewer steals and assists than Utah.
Improving those areas could have made the Mavericks’ shooting advantages more valuable.
The team needed to balance its scoring efficiency with more consistent possession control.
What Utah Did Well
Utah’s strongest statistical advantages were:
- Better ball security
The Jazz committed only nine turnovers.
- More defensive steals
Utah recorded 11 steals.
- Higher assist total
The Jazz finished with 32 assists.
- Strong individual scoring
Markkanen produced 33 points.
- Contributions across the rotation
George and Sensabaugh provided additional scoring, while Love led the team in rebounds.
These contributions helped Utah overcome its lower shooting percentages.
What Utah Could Improve
Despite winning, Utah did not dominate every statistical category.
The Jazz shot 32% from three-point range and 64% from the free-throw line.
Both figures were lower than Dallas’ corresponding percentages.
Utah also collected fewer rebounds.
Those areas remain important when evaluating the complete performance.
The result demonstrates that a team can win through strengths in specific categories while still having room to improve elsewhere.
Head-to-Head Season Series: Utah Leads 2-0
According to the supplied matchup summary, Utah entered this result with a 2-0 advantage in the season series against Dallas.
That information adds another layer to the matchup.
Season-series results help explain how two teams have performed against each other across their scheduled meetings.
However, they should not automatically be interpreted as proof that one team is stronger in every situation.
Individual matchups can produce different results depending on player availability, shooting performance, rotations, and game circumstances.
In this meeting, Utah’s ability to create turnovers and protect its own possessions was especially important.
Dallas produced strong shooting numbers, but the Jazz maintained their statistical advantage in the categories that ultimately mattered most to the result.
The 116-114 score also showed that the teams were closely matched on the scoreboard.
Match Venue, Attendance, and Broadcast Information
The game took place at the Delta Center in Salt Lake City, Utah.
The venue hosted 18,186 spectators for the contest.
Playing at home gave Utah the opportunity to compete in its regular home environment.
The reported broadcast information was:
| Team | Broadcast Information |
| Dallas Mavericks | KFAA-TV, MavsTV |
| Utah Jazz | KJZZ-TV, Jazz+ |
The reported referees were:
- Justin Van Duyne
- John Butler
- Mousa Dagher
These details help complete the match record and provide useful context for readers researching the event.
The supplied ESPN listing reports the game time as 7:00 AM. Because broadcast and listing times can depend on the displayed time zone, readers should consult the original event listing when comparing local start times.
Statistical Lessons From the Dallas and Utah Matchup
This game provides several useful lessons for understanding NBA box scores.
A box score should not be treated as a simple list of points and percentages.
The most useful analysis comes from examining how different statistics influence one another.
1. Shooting Percentage Does Not Guarantee Victory
Dallas shot better than Utah from the field and from three-point range.
It also converted free throws at a higher percentage.
Nevertheless, the Mavericks lost.
This shows why shooting percentages must be considered alongside possession statistics.
2. Turnovers Can Become a Decisive Factor
The 20-9 turnover comparison was the most significant statistical difference.
An 11-turnover gap is substantial in a game decided by two points.
Protecting the basketball is essential because every lost possession removes a scoring opportunity.
3. Defensive Activity Creates Additional Opportunities
Utah’s 11 steals demonstrated the value of active defense.
The Jazz were able to disrupt Dallas’ offensive possessions more frequently.
This helped compensate for their lower shooting efficiency.
4. Supporting Scorers Matter
Markkanen led Utah with 33 points, but George and Sensabaugh also made important contributions.
Dallas received scoring support from Thompson and Davis behind Flagg.
When several players contribute, a team’s offense becomes less dependent on a single scoring option.
5. Team Statistics and Individual Statistics Tell Different Stories
Anthony Davis led Dallas in rebounds, Cooper Flagg led in assists, and Lauri Markkanen led Utah in scoring.
These individual achievements are important.
However, the team result was influenced by collective performance.
The Jazz won because their overall approach to possessions was more effective, not because they led every individual category.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who Won the Dallas Mavericks vs Utah Jazz Game on January 9, 2026?
The Utah Jazz defeated the Dallas Mavericks 116-114 on January 9, 2026, at the Delta Center in Salt Lake City. Utah secured the two-point victory after a closely contested four-quarter game.
2. Who Was the Top Scorer in the Mavericks vs Jazz Match?
Lauri Markkanen was the leading scorer with 33 points for Utah. Cooper Flagg led Dallas with 26 points, followed by Klay Thompson with 23 and Anthony Davis with 21.
3. How Many Points Did Cooper Flagg Score Against Utah?
Cooper Flagg scored 26 points. He also recorded eight assists and three steals, making him Dallas’ leading scorer, playmaker, and leading steals contributor.
4. Why Did Utah Beat Dallas Despite Shooting a Lower Percentage?
Utah won primarily through better possession management and defensive pressure. The Jazz committed nine turnovers compared with Dallas’ 20 and recorded 11 steals compared with four.
5. How Many Rebounds Did Anthony Davis Record Against the Jazz?
Anthony Davis recorded 11 rebounds, making him Dallas’ leading rebounder. Utah’s Kevin Love led the Jazz with 10 rebounds.
6. What Were the Three-Point Shooting Percentages for Both Teams?
Dallas made 15 of 36 three-point attempts, finishing at 42%. Utah converted 13 of 41 attempts, producing a 32% three-point percentage.
Conclusion
The January 9, 2026, meeting between the Dallas Mavericks and Utah Jazz was a close NBA contest that demonstrated the importance of possession management and defensive pressure. Utah secured a 116-114 victory despite shooting a lower percentage from the field and beyond the three-point line.
Lauri Markkanen led the Jazz with 33 points, while Keyonte George contributed 19 points, seven assists, and three steals. Kevin Love added 10 rebounds. Dallas received strong performances from Cooper Flagg, who recorded 26 points, eight assists, and three steals, Klay Thompson, who scored 23 points, and Anthony Davis, who finished with 21 points and 11 rebounds.
The biggest difference appeared in the turnover statistics. Utah committed only nine turnovers, while Dallas committed 20. The Jazz also recorded 11 steals compared with Dallas’ four. These advantages helped Utah overcome the Mavericks’ better shooting percentages and five-rebound advantage.
Ultimately, the dallas mavericks vs utah jazz match player stats demonstrate that successful basketball requires more than efficient shooting. Ball security, defensive activity, teamwork, and consistent contributions from multiple players can determine the outcome of even the closest games.
