Celtics vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats
The celtics vs golden state warriors match player stats from the February 2026 meeting at Chase Center tell a much deeper story than the final 121-110 score. Boston combined efficient shooting, dominant rebounding, and exceptional playmaking from Jaylen Brown to control most of the game, while Golden State struggled to replace the offensive influence of Stephen Curry. Payton Pritchard led Boston with 26 points, Brown delivered a 23-point triple-double, and the Celtics created enough separation during the middle quarters to withstand a late Warriors comeback.
This game was especially interesting because the final margin does not fully explain how one-sided the contest became for long stretches. Boston built a large advantage through the second and third quarters before Golden State responded in the fourth. The Warriors eventually cut into the deficit, but Boston’s early offensive execution gave it enough room to protect the lead.
For anyone studying player performance, this matchup provides useful examples of why box score numbers should be read together rather than individually. Points explain who scored, but rebounds, assists, shooting efficiency, turnovers, three-point volume, and plus/minus help explain why the game developed the way it did.
Celtics vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats: Game Overview
Boston Celtics 121, Golden State Warriors 110.
The game was played at Chase Center in San Francisco, with an attendance of 18,064. Boston entered the matchup with a 36-19 record and an 18-10 road record, while Golden State stood at 29-27 with an 18-11 home record.
Boston’s offensive efficiency was one of the biggest differences between the teams. The Celtics made 49 of 95 field-goal attempts and converted 17 of 40 three-point attempts. They also shot 6 of 7 from the free-throw line.
Golden State made 43 of 96 field goals and 20 of 55 three-point attempts. The Warriors therefore attempted 15 more three-pointers than Boston, but their lower overall field-goal efficiency prevented that additional volume from translating into enough scoring.
Boston also won the rebounding battle 54-40 and the assist battle 36-30. Golden State did have the advantage in turnovers, committing only eight compared with Boston’s 13, but that advantage was not enough to compensate for Boston’s superior shooting and rebounding.
The official NBA box score records Boston at 51.6 percent from the field and 42.5 percent from three-point range, while Golden State finished at 44.8 percent and 36.4 percent respectively.
That efficiency gap is important. Boston did not simply shoot more. The Celtics converted their opportunities at a significantly better rate.
How the Game Was Decided
The final score was 121-110, but the most important part of the contest happened before the fourth quarter.
Boston established control through its offensive balance. Rather than relying on one scorer for nearly all of its production, the Celtics received contributions across the lineup. Brown handled a large playmaking role, Pritchard supplied scoring, and players such as Sam Hauser provided efficient perimeter shooting.
Golden State’s fourth-quarter response showed that the Warriors were capable of generating offense, but the late surge came after Boston had already created a substantial cushion.
The game therefore had two distinct phases.
First, Boston built the lead.
Second, Golden State attempted to recover.
That distinction matters when evaluating individual performances. A player can post strong fourth-quarter numbers while still having difficulty affecting the overall result because the game was already tilted heavily in the opponent’s favor.
Boston Celtics Player Performance
Payton Pritchard Leads Boston in Scoring
Payton Pritchard was Boston’s leading scorer with 26 points.
His scoring was especially valuable because it reduced the pressure on Jaylen Brown to carry the offensive workload. Brown was already contributing heavily in rebounding and playmaking, so Pritchard’s scoring allowed Boston to maintain offensive balance.
Pritchard’s perimeter shooting also mattered. Golden State could not focus exclusively on Brown because Boston had another reliable scoring option capable of punishing defensive space.
The importance of Pritchard’s 26 points becomes clearer when viewed alongside Brown’s triple-double. Boston had both a high-volume scorer and a high-impact all-around creator.
That combination is difficult for a defense to handle.
Jaylen Brown Produces a Triple-Double
Jaylen Brown was arguably the most influential player on the floor despite not leading the game in points.
He finished with:
- 23 points
- 15 rebounds
- 13 assists
- 10 made field goals
- 18 field-goal attempts
- 55.6 percent shooting
- 3 made free throws on 3 attempts
- 2 turnovers
The 15 rebounds matched his career high according to the official game recap, while his 13 assists were a career best.
Brown’s performance is important because it demonstrates the value of a complete stat line. If the analysis focused only on scoring, Pritchard would appear to have been Boston’s clear offensive leader. Brown’s broader contribution tells a different story.
He was Boston’s top rebounder and top assister while also scoring 23 points.
His 13 assists meant that many of Boston’s successful possessions did not require Brown to finish the play himself. He could attack, draw defensive attention, and create opportunities for teammates.
That is one reason the Celtics were able to maintain offensive pressure without becoming predictable.
Sam Hauser Provides Efficient Support
Sam Hauser scored 16 points and produced one of the strongest plus/minus performances of the game.
He finished with a plus-22 rating.
Hauser also shot 6 of 10 from the field and 4 of 5 from three-point range. His 80 percent three-point shooting was particularly significant because Boston’s offense benefited from spacing around its primary creators.
A player does not need to score 25 or 30 points to have a major impact. Hauser’s performance demonstrates how efficient shooting can influence defensive decisions.
When a perimeter shooter is converting at that rate, defenders have to respect the outside threat. That creates more room for ball handlers and cutters.
Boston’s Supporting Cast
Boston received contributions from several other players, helping the team avoid becoming overly dependent on its top two scorers.
Nikola Vucevic scored nine points and added five rebounds. He also finished with a plus-17 rating.
Hugo Gonzalez contributed seven points, four rebounds, and a steal while shooting 3 of 5 from the field.
Harper Jr. scored six points, including two three-pointers.
Jordan Walsh scored five points while making both of his field-goal attempts.
Luka Garza added three points in limited action.
These contributions may not appear spectacular individually, but they helped Boston maintain a functional rotation around its leading performers.
Golden State Warriors Player Performance
De’Anthony Melton Leads the Warriors in Scoring
De’Anthony Melton scored 18 points for Golden State, making him the team’s leading scorer.
He was efficient enough to keep pressure on Boston’s defense, but the Warriors needed more overall offensive production to overcome the Celtics’ efficiency.
Golden State’s offensive problem was not simply that one player failed to score enough. The broader issue was that Boston generated efficient scoring from multiple players while Golden State struggled to maintain comparable consistency.
Gui Santos Adds 17 Points
Gui Santos finished with 17 points and also led Golden State with a plus-8 rating.
He made 6 of 14 field-goal attempts and knocked down 5 of 9 three-point attempts.
His perimeter shooting was one of the more positive individual developments for Golden State.
Santos also recorded six rebounds and two steals. His performance therefore extended beyond scoring.
The plus-8 rating is especially interesting because Golden State lost by 11 points. Santos was one of the Warriors’ players who had a positive impact during his minutes even though the team could not sustain that advantage across the full game.
Will Richard Scores 17
Will Richard also scored 17 points.
He made 6 of 11 field-goal attempts, shot 3 of 7 from three-point range, and converted both of his free-throw attempts.
Richard added five rebounds, two assists, one steal, and one block.
His 17 points gave Golden State another important scoring source, but the Warriors needed more efficient team offense to turn those individual contributions into a win.
Gary Payton II Provides Energy
Gary Payton II scored 14 points while shooting 6 of 8 from the field.
He also recorded three rebounds, two assists, and one steal.
His 75 percent shooting was one of the best marks among Golden State players with significant offensive involvement.
Payton II’s production was particularly useful because his scoring came efficiently rather than through a large number of attempts.
Kristaps Porzingis Returns Against His Former Team
Kristaps Porzingis made his Golden State debut against Boston, the team with which he had previously played.
He scored 12 points in 17 minutes, making 5 of 9 field-goal attempts and 2 of 5 three-point attempts.
He also recorded one rebound, one assist, and one block.
His offensive efficiency was respectable, but the limited playing time meant he had only a relatively small opportunity to influence the game.
The matchup also added an interesting storyline because Porzingis had previously spent two seasons in Boston and won a championship with the Celtics before moving on.
Draymond Green Struggles to Score
Draymond Green had a difficult offensive night.
He went 0 for 7 from the field and 0 for 5 from three-point range, finishing without a point.
He did contribute three assists and two rebounds, but his shooting struggles were costly in a game where Golden State needed additional scoring.
The Warriors cannot be reduced to one player’s shooting performance, but a scoreless night from a major veteran contributor makes it much harder to keep pace with an opponent shooting above 50 percent from the field.
Celtics vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats: Key Statistical Comparison
| Category | Boston Celtics | Golden State Warriors |
| Final Score | 121 | 110 |
| Field Goals | 49/95 | 43/96 |
| Field Goal % | 51.6% | 44.8% |
| Three-Pointers | 17/40 | 20/55 |
| Three-Point % | 42.5% | 36.4% |
| Free Throws | 6/7 | 4/8 |
| Rebounds | 54 | 40 |
| Assists | 36 | 30 |
| Turnovers | 13 | 8 |
| Steals | 7 | 8 |
| Blocks | 6 | 4 |
The table makes the central story clear.
Golden State made three more three-pointers than Boston, but Boston still won comfortably.
Why?
Because Boston was significantly more efficient overall and controlled the glass.
The Celtics attempted 95 field goals and made 49. The Warriors attempted 96 but made only 43.
That six-field-goal difference is substantial.
Boston also collected 14 more rebounds. More rebounds can lead to additional possessions, second-chance opportunities, and better control over the pace of the game.
Why Boston’s Rebounding Advantage Mattered
Boston’s 54 rebounds compared with Golden State’s 40 was one of the clearest statistical advantages of the night.
Jaylen Brown was central to that difference with 15 rebounds, all of them defensive according to the official game recap.
A strong defensive rebounding performance limits second chances. When a team secures a defensive rebound, the possession ends and the opponent cannot immediately attack the offensive glass.
Boston’s rebounding also helped compensate for its 13 turnovers.
Golden State committed only eight turnovers, giving the Warriors a five-turnover advantage.
Normally, a turnover advantage can be extremely valuable.
But Golden State’s rebounding disadvantage and lower shooting efficiency outweighed that benefit.
This is an important lesson when analyzing box scores: no single category should be treated as the entire explanation for a result.
The Three-Point Battle Was More Complicated Than It Looks
Golden State made 20 three-pointers, compared with Boston’s 17.
At first glance, that might suggest the Warriors should have won the perimeter battle.
But volume and efficiency are different things.
Golden State attempted 55 threes and made 20, shooting 36.4 percent.
Boston attempted 40 and made 17, shooting 42.5 percent.
The Celtics therefore made only three fewer three-pointers while taking 15 fewer attempts.
That is a major efficiency advantage.
Boston’s approach was not necessarily about maximizing three-point attempts. Instead, the Celtics converted a higher percentage of their attempts while also generating effective offense elsewhere.
This is why looking only at made threes can be misleading.
Boston’s Ball Movement Stood Out
Boston finished with 36 assists.
Golden State had 30.
The six-assist advantage fits the broader picture of Boston’s offensive balance.
Jaylen Brown accounted for 13 of Boston’s assists by himself.
That means Brown directly created a significant portion of the team’s scoring opportunities.
The Celtics did not need Brown to dominate every possession as a scorer. His passing allowed him to affect the game even when he was not taking a shot.
This is one of the strongest reasons his performance deserves more attention than his 23-point scoring total alone might suggest.
The Importance of the Second Quarter
The second quarter was one of the defining stretches of the game.
Boston scored 38 points in the period according to the official NBA linescore, while Golden State scored 19.
That 19-point difference dramatically changed the game.
Boston entered halftime with a large advantage and had created the conditions for the second half.
The Celtics’ offensive execution during this stretch was particularly important because Golden State struggled to respond consistently.
Once a team builds a substantial halftime deficit, the opponent has to spend considerable energy simply getting back into the game.
That is exactly what happened here.
Golden State’s Fourth-Quarter Comeback
The Warriors did not simply disappear after halftime.
Golden State scored 37 points in the fourth quarter while Boston scored 19.
That was a major swing.
The Warriors were able to reduce the deficit and create late-game pressure.
However, Boston had already established enough separation to survive the comeback attempt.
Payton Pritchard was especially important late, including back-to-back three-pointers during the Warriors’ push.
This sequence demonstrates why early leads matter.
A team does not need to win every quarter. It needs to accumulate enough value across the game that an opponent’s best late stretch is not enough to reverse the result.
Shooting Efficiency vs Shot Volume
One of the most useful lessons from this matchup is the difference between shot volume and shot quality.
Golden State attempted 96 field goals, one more than Boston.
The Warriors also attempted 55 three-pointers, compared with Boston’s 40.
Yet Boston scored 121 points while Golden State scored 110.
The Celtics were more efficient with the opportunities they created.
Boston’s 51.6 percent field-goal percentage was nearly seven percentage points higher than Golden State’s 44.8 percent.
That gap was more meaningful than the Warriors’ advantage in three-point attempts.
For readers studying player statistics, this is a useful reminder that a high number of attempts does not automatically indicate a strong offensive performance.
Efficiency matters.
Plus/Minus Adds Another Layer
Plus/minus can be imperfect when used by itself, but it can still provide useful context when combined with traditional statistics.
Sam Hauser led Boston with a plus-22.
Nikola Vucevic was also strong at plus-17.
On Golden State’s side, Gui Santos led the team with plus-8.
The Warriors’ team total was negative 11 because they lost by 11 points.
Plus/minus should not be treated as a perfect measure of individual value because it is affected by teammates, opponents, lineups, and game context.
Still, Hauser’s plus-22 alongside his 16 points and 80 percent three-point shooting supports the conclusion that his minutes were highly productive.
What the Player Stats Say About Boston
The statistical profile of Boston’s victory can be summarized through five themes.
1. Efficient shooting
Boston shot above 50 percent from the field and above 42 percent from three.
2. Elite rebounding from Brown
Jaylen Brown’s 15 rebounds helped Boston dominate the overall rebounding category.
3. Outstanding playmaking
Brown’s 13 assists were a career best and gave Boston another offensive engine.
4. Multiple scoring options
Pritchard led the team with 26 points, while Brown scored 23 and Hauser added 16.
5. Strong team balance
Boston had 36 assists and 54 rebounds, demonstrating that the victory was not based solely on one player’s scoring.
What the Player Stats Say About Golden State
Golden State’s numbers tell a different story.
The Warriors had several productive individual performances.
Melton scored 18.
Santos and Richard each scored 17.
Payton II added 14.
Porzingis scored 12.
But the team did not receive enough efficient production from all of its major contributors.
Draymond Green’s scoreless performance was particularly difficult to overcome.
The Warriors also shot only 36.4 percent from three despite attempting 55 shots from beyond the arc.
That combination of high volume and moderate efficiency created an offensive ceiling that Boston was able to exploit.
A Closer Look at Jaylen Brown’s Triple-Double
Brown’s 23-point, 15-rebound, 13-assist performance deserves special attention because it was not a typical scoring-focused triple-double.
His contribution was distributed across several areas.
Twenty-three points gave Boston reliable scoring.
Fifteen rebounds strengthened the team’s possession control.
Thirteen assists created opportunities for teammates.
This type of performance is particularly valuable against a team that relies heavily on perimeter offense.
By controlling rebounds and initiating offense, Brown affected both ends of Boston’s possession cycle.
He could finish a possession with a score, extend a defensive possession with a rebound, or begin a new offensive possession with a pass.
That versatility made him one of the central reasons Boston controlled the matchup.
Why Pritchard’s 26 Points Were So Important
Brown’s all-around performance attracted attention, but Pritchard’s scoring was equally important from a team perspective.
Boston needed another player who could convert perimeter opportunities and punish defensive attention directed toward Brown.
Pritchard’s 26 points filled that role.
When a defense commits additional resources toward a player such as Brown, the offense needs secondary scoring.
Without it, a defense can shrink the floor and force difficult shots.
With it, the defense has to make difficult choices.
Boston benefited from that second option.
The Role of Offensive Balance
Boston’s victory provides a good example of why balanced offense can be more reliable than a one-player attack.
The Celtics had:
- A 26-point leading scorer
- A 23-point triple-double
- A 16-point perimeter shooter
- Additional contributions from multiple rotation players
- 36 total assists
That structure creates multiple paths to scoring.
Golden State had several players reach double figures, but Boston’s combination of scoring, passing, and rebounding was more complete.
Game Flow by Quarter
First Quarter
The opening quarter was competitive, with Boston establishing only a modest advantage.
The official NBA linescore records Boston scoring 36 points and Golden State scoring 32.
Both teams were able to generate offense, but Boston’s efficiency began setting the tone.
Second Quarter
The second quarter was the decisive early swing.
Boston scored 38 points while Golden State managed 19.
That 19-point advantage transformed the game from a competitive matchup into a significant Boston lead.
Third Quarter
Boston continued to control the game in the third, scoring 28 points compared with Golden State’s 22.
The Celtics extended their advantage while the Warriors searched for an offensive response.
Fourth Quarter
Golden State finally found its strongest offensive rhythm.
The Warriors scored 37 points, compared with Boston’s 19.
Despite the comeback, Boston’s earlier advantage was too large to erase.
The Celtics closed out the game with an 11-point victory.
Historical and Season Context
This result gave Boston a 1-0 lead in the season series.
Boston also improved to 36-19 overall and 18-10 on the road based on the supplied game data.
Golden State moved to 29-27 overall and 18-11 at home.
Those records provide useful context for understanding the result.
Boston entered the matchup with a stronger overall record and demonstrated that strength on the road.
Golden State’s home record was competitive, but the Warriors were unable to match Boston’s efficiency over the full 48 minutes.
What Fans Should Take From the Box Score
The biggest mistake when reading this game would be to focus exclusively on the 11-point final margin.
The more revealing statistics are:
- Boston shot 51.6 percent from the field.
- Boston shot 42.5 percent from three.
- Boston outrebounded Golden State 54-40.
- Boston recorded 36 assists.
- Jaylen Brown posted 23 points, 15 rebounds, and 13 assists.
- Payton Pritchard scored 26 points.
- Sam Hauser finished plus-22.
- Golden State attempted 55 three-pointers but made only 20.
- Draymond Green scored zero points.
- Golden State still won the turnover battle 8-13.
Together, these numbers explain why Boston won despite Golden State’s higher three-point volume and lower turnover total.
What This Matchup Teaches About Player Evaluation
A useful player evaluation should answer more than the question, “How many points did he score?”
A better analysis asks:
- How efficiently did the player score?
- Did the player create opportunities for teammates?
- Did the player contribute on the glass?
- How did the team perform during his minutes?
- Did the player create defensive value?
- How did his performance fit the team’s overall strategy?
Using those questions, Brown’s performance becomes even more impressive.
Pritchard’s scoring becomes more meaningful when considered alongside Brown’s playmaking.
Hauser’s plus-22 becomes more informative when paired with his efficient shooting.
Santos’ plus-8 provides context for his 17-point performance even though the Warriors lost.
This approach produces a more complete picture than a simple points ranking.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the top scorer in the Celtics vs Golden State Warriors game?
Payton Pritchard was Boston’s leading scorer with 26 points. De’Anthony Melton led Golden State with 18 points.
What was Jaylen Brown’s stat line?
Jaylen Brown finished with 23 points, 15 rebounds, and 13 assists. He also shot 10 of 18 from the field and produced a triple-double.
Who won the Celtics vs Golden State Warriors game?
The Boston Celtics defeated the Golden State Warriors 121-110 at Chase Center.
How many three-pointers did each team make?
Boston made 17 three-pointers on 40 attempts. Golden State made 20 three-pointers on 55 attempts.
Who led the game in rebounds?
Jaylen Brown led all players with 15 rebounds. Al Horford was Golden State’s top rebounder with eight.
Who had the best plus/minus?
Sam Hauser led the game with a plus-22 rating. Gui Santos led Golden State at plus-8.
Conclusion
The celtics vs golden state warriors match player stats show that Boston’s 121-110 victory was built on efficiency, rebounding, passing, and balanced scoring rather than one isolated statistical advantage.
Payton Pritchard’s 26 points gave the Celtics their leading scoring performance, while Jaylen Brown delivered the most complete individual game with 23 points, 15 rebounds, and 13 assists. Sam Hauser added highly efficient perimeter shooting and finished with the game’s best plus/minus.
For Golden State, De’Anthony Melton scored 18 points, while Gui Santos and Will Richard each scored 17. Gary Payton II provided efficient scoring, and Kristaps Porzingis made an effective offensive debut against his former team. However, the Warriors could not overcome their lower overall shooting percentage and significant rebounding disadvantage.
The most important statistical takeaway is that Golden State’s higher three-point volume did not translate into superior offensive efficiency. Boston made 49 of 95 field goals and shot 51.6 percent, while Golden State made 43 of 96 and shot 44.8 percent. Boston also won the rebounding battle by 14 and recorded six more assists.
The game ultimately demonstrated how several complementary strengths can outweigh a single statistical advantage. Golden State made more three-pointers and committed fewer turnovers, but Boston controlled enough of the other major categories to build a lead that survived a strong fourth-quarter response.
For readers evaluating individual performances, Brown’s triple-double is the clearest example of why player statistics should be considered as a complete profile. Scoring matters, but rebounds, assists, efficiency, possession control, and lineup impact can tell an even broader story about how a player influenced a game.
