Los angeles chargers vs las vegas raiders match player stats
The los angeles chargers vs las vegas raiders match player stats from November 30, 2025, reveal how the Los Angeles Chargers secured a convincing 31-14 victory over the Las Vegas Raiders. The Chargers combined a productive rushing attack, efficient quarterback play, and consistent defensive pressure to control the game, particularly during the second half. Kimani Vidal delivered the standout individual performance with 126 rushing yards and a touchdown, while Brock Bowers provided the Raiders’ biggest offensive contribution by catching two touchdown passes. Although Las Vegas showed some promise through its passing game, its inability to establish an effective rushing attack became a major obstacle. The Chargers finished with 192 rushing yards, compared with only 31 for the Raiders, creating a significant difference in offensive balance and overall game control.
The matchup offered an interesting contrast between two AFC West teams with very different offensive performances. Los Angeles entered the contest with an 8-4 record, including a 5-2 home record, while Las Vegas arrived at 2-10 overall and 1-5 on the road. Those records reflected the different situations facing both franchises, but the game itself provided a more detailed explanation of the gap between the teams.
Rather than relying entirely on passing production, the Chargers used their running backs to control possession and create favorable situations. The Raiders, meanwhile, depended heavily on Geno Smith’s passing and Brock Bowers’ receiving ability. That approach produced two passing touchdowns, but it could not compensate for the team’s limited ground production and defensive difficulties.
This breakdown examines the final score, quarterback performances, rushing and receiving statistics, defensive contributions, turnovers, special teams, and the most important individual performances from the contest.
Los Angeles Chargers vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats: Complete Game Overview
The Chargers defeated the Raiders 31-14 on November 30, 2025. Los Angeles established an early advantage, experienced a brief interruption in the second quarter, and then delivered its strongest offensive performance after halftime.
The final score represented a 17-point victory for Los Angeles.
File:Los Angeles Chargers logo.svg – Wikimedia Commons
Los Angeles Chargers
31
Winner
8-4 overall
VS
November 30
2025
The new Las Vegas Raiders logo is as sharp as a blade – Yahoo Sports
Las Vegas Raiders
14
Defeated
2-10 overall
Quarter-by-quarter scoring
| Quarter | Raiders | Chargers |
| First | 0 | 7 |
| Second | 7 | 0 |
| Third | 0 | 14 |
| Fourth | 7 | 10 |
| Final | 14 | 31 |
Match Summary
| Game Detail | Information |
| Sport | NFL |
| Matchup | Los Angeles Chargers vs. Las Vegas Raiders |
| Date | November 30, 2025 |
| Winning team | Los Angeles Chargers |
| Final score | Chargers 31, Raiders 14 |
| Chargers record | 8-4 |
| Raiders record | 2-10 |
| Chargers home record | 5-2 |
| Raiders away record | 1-5 |
| Winning margin | 17 points |
The opening quarter immediately favored Los Angeles. The Chargers scored seven points while keeping the Raiders off the scoreboard.
Las Vegas responded in the second quarter with seven points of its own. That scoring sequence brought the teams level at halftime, creating the impression that the Raiders might remain competitive.
However, the third quarter changed the direction of the contest. Los Angeles scored 14 unanswered points, taking a commanding lead into the final period.
The Chargers added another 10 points in the fourth quarter. Las Vegas managed a final touchdown, but the comeback attempt never developed into a serious threat.
How the Game Changed After Halftime
The most important scoring difference appeared in the third quarter.
Los Angeles scored twice during that period, while its defense prevented the Raiders from adding points. This combination created separation on the scoreboard and forced Las Vegas to chase the game.
The Raiders needed more offensive possessions and stronger running production to respond. Instead, their rushing attack remained ineffective.
The Chargers also benefited from a balanced offensive approach. Their running backs repeatedly gained positive yardage, allowing the offense to avoid becoming overly dependent on Justin Herbert’s passing.
That balance became increasingly important as the game progressed.
Quarterback Performance: Justin Herbert vs Geno Smith
Quarterback production is an essential part of understanding any NFL matchup. Passing efficiency, touchdowns, interceptions, sacks, and decision-making all influence how an offense performs.
Both starting quarterbacks threw two touchdown passes, but their individual numbers reveal different offensive approaches.
Justin Herbert’s Passing Statistics
Justin Herbert guided the Chargers’ passing offense with an efficient performance.
| Statistic | Justin Herbert |
| Completions | 15 |
| Attempts | 20 |
| Completion percentage | 75.0% |
| Passing yards | 151 |
| Yards per attempt | 7.6 |
| Passing touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks | 3 |
| Sack yards lost | 11 |
| QBR | 66.6 |
| Passer rating | 108.5 |
Herbert completed 15 of his 20 attempts, producing a 75% completion rate.
His 151 passing yards were not an enormous total, but the number should be considered alongside the Chargers’ rushing production.
Los Angeles did not need Herbert to attempt a high volume of passes because its running game was consistently productive.
He threw two touchdown passes and finished with a 108.5 passer rating. His 7.6 yards per attempt also demonstrated that the Chargers were able to generate useful yardage without relying on excessive passing volume.
The interception was an area where his performance could have been cleaner. However, his two touchdown passes and efficient completion percentage helped maintain offensive momentum.
An important detail is that Herbert was also supported by a strong running game. When an offense can consistently gain yards on the ground, the quarterback has more opportunities to operate without facing predictable passing situations.
Geno Smith’s Passing Statistics
Geno Smith led the Raiders’ passing offense.
| Statistic | Geno Smith |
| Completions | 18 |
| Attempts | 23 |
| Completion percentage | 78.3% |
| Passing yards | 165 |
| Yards per attempt | 7.2 |
| Passing touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks | 5 |
| Sack yards lost | 40 |
| QBR | 58.9 |
| Passer rating | 107.4 |
Smith completed 18 of 23 passes, producing a completion percentage of approximately 78.3%.
He recorded 165 passing yards and two touchdown passes. His 107.4 passer rating was also respectable.
At first glance, these numbers suggest that Smith performed competitively against Herbert.
However, the five sacks tell a different story.
Smith lost 40 yards through sacks, which created significant problems for the Raiders’ offensive rhythm. Even when a quarterback completes passes efficiently, repeated negative plays can make it difficult to sustain drives.
The Raiders also struggled to establish their running game. This placed additional pressure on Smith to create opportunities through the air.
His interception was another costly moment, although the supplied statistics do not establish the exact field position or scoring consequences of that play.
Herbert vs Smith: Statistical Comparison
| Passing Category | Justin Herbert | Geno Smith |
| Completions | 15 | 18 |
| Attempts | 20 | 23 |
| Completion percentage | 75.0% | 78.3% |
| Passing yards | 151 | 165 |
| Yards per attempt | 7.6 | 7.2 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 1 |
| Sacks | 3 | 5 |
| Sack yards | 11 | 40 |
| QBR | 66.6 | 58.9 |
| Passer rating | 108.5 | 107.4 |
Smith finished with more passing yards and a higher completion percentage.
Herbert, however, produced a slightly higher passer rating and QBR while taking fewer sacks and losing substantially fewer yards.
The most important distinction was not simply the number of passing yards. It was how effectively each quarterback operated within his team’s overall offensive structure.
Herbert had a productive rushing attack supporting him. Smith faced a much more difficult situation because the Raiders could not consistently generate yardage on the ground.
Trey Lance’s Contribution
Trey Lance also appeared for Los Angeles.
| Statistic | Trey Lance |
| Completions | 1 |
| Attempts | 1 |
| Passing yards | 9 |
| Yards per attempt | 9.0 |
| Passing touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| QBR | 54.7 |
| Passer rating | 104.2 |
| Rushing attempts | 4 |
| Rushing yards | 4 |
Lance completed his only passing attempt for nine yards.
He also recorded four rushing attempts for four yards. Although his statistical contribution was limited, his appearance provided the Chargers with another quarterback option during the contest.
The supplied numbers show that Herbert handled the primary passing responsibilities, while Lance contributed through a smaller number of offensive opportunities.
Rushing Statistics: Kimani Vidal Leads the Chargers
The biggest statistical difference between the two teams appeared in the rushing department.
Los Angeles finished with 192 rushing yards on 43 attempts, averaging 4.5 yards per carry.
Las Vegas recorded only 31 rushing yards on 18 attempts, averaging 1.7 yards per carry.
That difference of 161 rushing yards explains much of the offensive imbalance.
Los Angeles Chargers Rushing Leaders
| Player | Attempts | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Kimani Vidal | 25 | 126 | 5.0 | 1 | 59 |
| Jaret Patterson | 11 | 54 | 4.9 | 1 | 22 |
| Justin Herbert | 3 | 8 | 2.7 | 0 | 4 |
| Trey Lance | 4 | 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 4 |
| Team Total | 43 | 192 | 4.5 | 2 | 59 |
Kimani Vidal’s Outstanding Performance
Kimani Vidal was the leading offensive performer in the rushing department.
He finished with:
- 25 rushing attempts.
- 126 rushing yards.
- 5.0 yards per carry.
- One rushing touchdown.
- A longest run of 59 yards.
His performance was particularly important because it gave Los Angeles a reliable method of moving the football without depending entirely on passing plays.
Vidal averaged five yards per carry, which allowed the Chargers to maintain favorable down-and-distance situations.
His longest run of 59 yards demonstrated his ability to create a significant gain when the offensive line opened space.
The volume of his carries was equally important. Twenty-five rushing attempts gave him a central role in the offensive game plan.
A running back who consistently gains positive yardage can help an offense control possession, reduce pressure on its quarterback, and make defensive adjustments more difficult.
Vidal accomplished several of those objectives during this matchup.
His 126-yard performance also represented more than 65% of the Chargers’ total rushing yardage.
Jaret Patterson’s Important Contribution
Jaret Patterson provided another productive rushing option.
He recorded:
- 11 carries.
- 54 rushing yards.
- 4.9 yards per carry.
- One touchdown.
- A longest run of 22 yards.
Patterson’s contribution helped prevent the Chargers from relying exclusively on Vidal.
His average of 4.9 yards per attempt was nearly identical to Vidal’s 5.0 average.
The combination gave Los Angeles two running backs capable of generating consistent yardage.
Patterson also scored a rushing touchdown, adding another important scoring contribution to the Chargers’ offense.
Using two productive running backs can help distribute physical workloads and keep the ground game effective throughout a contest.
In this game, both players delivered meaningful production.
Las Vegas Raiders Rushing Leaders
The Raiders experienced considerably more difficulty establishing their rushing offense.
| Player | Attempts | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Ashton Jeanty | 15 | 31 | 2.1 | 0 | 9 |
| Raheem Mostert | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 |
| Geno Smith | 2 | -6 | -3.0 | 0 | -1 |
| Team Total | 18 | 31 | 1.7 | 0 | 9 |
Ashton Jeanty’s Rushing Performance
Ashton Jeanty handled the majority of the Raiders’ rushing attempts.
He recorded 15 carries for 31 yards, averaging just 2.1 yards per attempt.
His longest run covered nine yards, and he did not score a rushing touchdown.
The numbers demonstrate how difficult it was for Las Vegas to create consistent ground production.
Jeanty received enough opportunities to influence the running game, but the available yardage was limited.
A 2.1-yard average makes it difficult for an offense to maintain a balanced attack. It often creates longer passing situations and gives opposing defenses more opportunities to anticipate the next play.
That problem was especially significant against a Chargers defense that eventually recorded five sacks.
Raheem Mostert’s Limited Opportunity
Raheem Mostert received one rushing attempt and gained six yards.
His 6.0-yard average was the highest among the Raiders’ listed rushing contributors.
However, one attempt is not enough to establish a meaningful performance trend.
His contribution remained limited compared with Jeanty’s workload.
Why the Rushing Difference Mattered
The overall rushing comparison was decisive.
| Team | Carries | Rushing Yards | Average | Rushing TD |
| Chargers | 43 | 192 | 4.5 | 2 |
| Raiders | 18 | 31 | 1.7 | 0 |
Los Angeles gained 161 more rushing yards than Las Vegas.
The Chargers also scored two rushing touchdowns, while the Raiders failed to record one.
This difference influenced the entire offensive structure of the game.
Los Angeles could continue using its running backs to move the chains, while Las Vegas had to depend more heavily on its quarterback and receiving targets.
The statistics suggest that the Chargers’ ground game was the most important factor separating the two offenses.
Receiving Statistics: Brock Bowers Delivers Two Touchdowns
Although the Raiders struggled to run the football, their passing offense produced some notable individual performances.
Brock Bowers was the standout receiver for Las Vegas, recording two touchdown receptions.
The Chargers also received productive contributions from Ladd McConkey, Quentin Johnston, Keenan Allen, and other offensive players.
Las Vegas Raiders Receiving Leaders
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Targets |
| Brock Bowers | 4 | 63 | 15.8 | 2 | 4 |
| Ashton Jeanty | 4 | 30 | 5.0* | 0 | 8 |
| Jack Bech | 2 | 22 | 11.0 | 0 | 3 |
| Tre Tucker | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 0 | 3 |
| Tyler Lockett | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dont’e Thornton Jr. | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Ian Thomas | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Team Total | 18 | 165 | 9.2 | 2 | 22 |
The supplied individual entry for Jeanty lists 30 receiving yards and a 5.0 average, although that average does not align with the listed four receptions. The figures are preserved as supplied.
Brock Bowers: The Raiders’ Most Important Receiver
Brock Bowers delivered the most significant receiving performance for Las Vegas.
His final statistics included:
- Four receptions.
- 63 receiving yards.
- 15.8 yards per reception.
- Two receiving touchdowns.
- Four targets.
- A longest reception of 27 yards.
Bowers converted every listed target into a reception, according to the supplied statistics.
His two touchdowns accounted for all of the Raiders’ passing touchdowns.
This made him the most important scoring threat in the Las Vegas receiving group.
His 15.8 yards per reception also demonstrated that his contributions were not limited to short passes.
He averaged more than 15 yards whenever he caught the football, creating valuable offensive production despite the Raiders’ overall struggles.
The fact that Bowers recorded two touchdowns while receiving only four targets highlights his importance to the passing offense.
However, the Raiders needed more consistent contributions from their other offensive players to turn those individual plays into a more competitive overall performance.
Ashton Jeanty’s Receiving Contribution
Jeanty also contributed as a receiver.
He recorded four receptions for 30 yards on eight targets.
His receiving involvement showed that the Raiders attempted to use him in multiple offensive roles.
Although his rushing production was limited, the passing game provided another way to involve him.
This dual role can be valuable for an offense because it allows a running back to contribute even when the ground attack encounters defensive resistance.
Other Raiders Receiving Performances
Jack Bech recorded two receptions for 22 yards, averaging 11 yards per catch.
Tre Tucker finished with three receptions for 20 yards.
Tyler Lockett added one reception for 11 yards, while Dont’e Thornton Jr. also recorded 11 receiving yards on one catch.
Ian Thomas finished with one reception for eight yards.
These contributions helped the Raiders reach 165 receiving yards.
However, outside Bowers, no listed Raiders receiver scored a touchdown.
Los Angeles Chargers Receiving Leaders
The Chargers distributed their receiving production among several players.
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Targets |
| Ladd McConkey | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 1 | 6 |
| Tre’ Harris | 3 | 30 | 10.0 | 0 | 4 |
| Keenan Allen | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 0 | 5 |
| Oronde Gadsden | 1 | 27 | 27.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Quentin Johnston | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimani Vidal | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Team Total | 16 | 160 | 10.0 | 2 | 21 |
Ladd McConkey’s Receiving Performance
Ladd McConkey was one of Herbert’s important receiving options.
He finished with:
- Four receptions.
- 39 receiving yards.
- 9.8 yards per reception.
- One touchdown.
- Six targets.
McConkey led the Chargers’ listed receivers in receiving yardage.
His touchdown also contributed directly to the team’s scoring production.
His four receptions provided Herbert with a dependable option, while his involvement helped distribute the passing workload across multiple receivers.
Although his receiving total was not exceptionally high, it represented a useful contribution within a game where the running attack handled much of the offensive responsibility.
Quentin Johnston Adds Another Touchdown
Quentin Johnston recorded three receptions for 23 yards and one touchdown.
He averaged 7.7 yards per reception and received three targets.
His touchdown gave Los Angeles another scoring option outside the backfield.
The Chargers’ ability to receive touchdown production from multiple offensive positions made their scoring attack more difficult to defend.
Keenan Allen’s Contribution
Keenan Allen recorded four receptions for 30 yards.
His average was 7.5 yards per reception, and he received five targets.
Allen tied McConkey for the most receptions among the Chargers’ listed receiving players.
His involvement helped maintain a consistent passing connection between Herbert and the receiving group.
Oronde Gadsden’s Big Reception
Oronde Gadsden had one reception for 27 yards.
Although he caught the football only once, his reception produced the longest individual receiving gain among the listed Chargers receivers.
He averaged 27 yards per catch.
That single play added valuable explosive yardage to the passing offense.
Comparing Both Receiving Groups
| Receiving Category | Raiders | Chargers |
| Receptions | 18 | 16 |
| Receiving yards | 165 | 160* |
| Yards per reception | 9.2 | 10.0 |
| Receiving touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| Targets | 22 | 21 |
The individual Chargers receiving entries add up to 160 yards. The supplied team passing line lists 149 yards, creating a discrepancy discussed later.
The Raiders finished with more listed receptions and receiving yards when the individual player totals are used.
However, the Chargers had a slightly higher average per reception.
Both teams recorded two receiving touchdowns.
The key difference was how their receiving production fitted into their overall offensive systems.
Los Angeles combined its passing game with an extremely productive running attack. Las Vegas did not have the same balance.
Defensive Player Statistics: Which Defense Controlled the Game?
Offensive statistics explain how teams generate points, but defensive performance often determines whether an opponent can maintain its scoring opportunities.
The Chargers recorded five sacks, eight tackles for loss, five passes defended, and nine quarterback hits.
The Raiders recorded three sacks, seven tackles for loss, one pass defended, and four quarterback hits.
These figures show that Los Angeles created more pressure and disrupted the opposing offense more frequently.
Los Angeles Chargers Defensive Leaders
| Player | Tackles | Solo | Sacks | TFL | QB Hits |
| Denzel Perryman | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Tuli Tuipulotu | 7 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Elijah Molden | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Khalil Mack | 4 | 2 | 0.5 | 0 | 2 |
| Cam Hart | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justin Eboigbe | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Tony Jefferson | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daiyan Henley | 3 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 |
| Bud Dupree | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Derwin James Jr. | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 1 |
Tuli Tuipulotu’s Dominant Defensive Performance
Tuli Tuipulotu delivered one of the most impactful defensive performances for Los Angeles.
His statistics included:
- Seven total tackles.
- Five solo tackles.
- Two sacks.
- Four tackles for loss.
- One pass defended.
- Two quarterback hits.
His four tackles for loss were particularly important.
A tackle for loss disrupts an offensive play before the ball carrier reaches the line of scrimmage or the intended target.
Such plays can force offenses into difficult down-and-distance situations.
Tuipulotu’s two sacks also placed additional pressure on Geno Smith.
The Raiders were already struggling to establish their running game. Defensive pressure made their offensive situation even more challenging.
Tuipulotu’s performance was a major part of the Chargers’ defensive success.
Denzel Perryman’s Tackling Contribution
Denzel Perryman recorded seven tackles, including six solo tackles.
He also contributed one tackle for loss.
His performance demonstrated consistent involvement in stopping the Raiders’ offensive plays.
Seven tackles placed him among the Chargers’ leading defenders in total tackles.
Khalil Mack’s Pressure
Khalil Mack recorded four tackles and half a sack.
He also contributed two quarterback hits.
Although his sack total was smaller than Tuipulotu’s, his pressure added to the defensive workload faced by Smith.
Quarterback hits can affect a passing offense even when they do not result in sacks.
They can force hurried decisions, disrupt throwing mechanics, and make quarterbacks less comfortable in the pocket.
Bud Dupree’s Contribution
Bud Dupree finished with two tackles, one sack, one tackle for loss, and one quarterback hit.
His sack provided another important negative play against the Raiders.
Los Angeles received contributions from multiple defensive players rather than depending on one individual to create all the pressure.
Raiders Defensive Leaders
| Player | Tackles | Solo | Sacks | TFL | QB Hits |
| Jeremy Chinn | 17 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Devin White | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maxx Crosby | 9 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Adam Butler | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thomas Booker IV | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Darien Porter | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jamal Adams | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Elandon Roberts | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Malcolm Koonce | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Tyree Wilson | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Jeremy Chinn Leads the Raiders in Tackles
Jeremy Chinn recorded 17 total tackles, including eight solo tackles.
He led all listed Raiders defenders in total tackles.
His involvement reflected the amount of defensive work Las Vegas had to handle during the contest.
When an opposing offense consistently generates yardage, defenders often receive more opportunities to make tackles.
Chinn’s total was therefore a notable individual statistic, although it did not translate into enough defensive stops to prevent the Chargers from scoring 31 points.
Devin White’s Defensive Contribution
Devin White recorded 11 tackles, including five solo tackles.
His total made him the second-leading Raiders defender in tackles.
Like Chinn, White was heavily involved in defensive actions throughout the game.
However, the overall defensive performance struggled to contain the Chargers’ running attack.
Maxx Crosby’s Strong Individual Performance
Maxx Crosby remained one of the most productive defensive players for Las Vegas.
He recorded:
- Nine total tackles.
- Six solo tackles.
- Two sacks.
- Four tackles for loss.
- Two quarterback hits.
His two sacks matched Tuipulotu’s total.
Crosby also finished with four tackles for loss, demonstrating his ability to disrupt offensive plays.
Despite his strong individual numbers, the Raiders could not consistently stop the Chargers.
This illustrates an important point about football statistics: an outstanding defensive performance from one player does not automatically produce a successful team result.
Malcolm Koonce Adds Defensive Pressure
Malcolm Koonce recorded two tackles, one sack, one tackle for loss, and one quarterback hit.
His sack contributed to the Raiders’ three total sacks.
The Raiders generated some pressure against Herbert, but they did not create enough defensive stops to reverse the game’s overall direction.
Defensive Team Comparison
| Defensive Statistic | Chargers | Raiders |
| Total tackles | 53 | 78 |
| Solo tackles | 33 | 42 |
| Sacks | 5 | 3 |
| Tackles for loss | 8 | 7 |
| Passes defended | 5 | 1 |
| Quarterback hits | 9 | 4 |
The Raiders recorded more total tackles, but the Chargers produced better results in several important defensive categories.
Los Angeles recorded two more sacks, one additional tackle for loss, four more passes defended, and five more quarterback hits.
The difference in pressure production was particularly important.
The Chargers consistently created difficult situations for Smith, while the Raiders struggled to prevent the Los Angeles offense from establishing its preferred rhythm.
Interceptions and Turnovers
Turnovers can change the direction of an NFL game by giving one team additional possessions and creating opportunities for quick scoring drives.
Both teams recorded one interception in this matchup.
Las Vegas Raiders Interception
Kyu Blu Kelly recorded one interception for the Raiders.
His interception included:
- One interception.
- Zero return yards.
- Zero interception-return touchdowns.
This was an important defensive contribution because it prevented a Chargers passing possession from continuing.
However, the Raiders were unable to translate their overall defensive efforts into enough offensive momentum to overcome the final scoring difference.
Los Angeles Chargers Interception
Tony Jefferson recorded one interception for Los Angeles.
His statistics included:
- One interception.
- Zero return yards.
- Zero interception-return touchdowns.
Jefferson’s interception represented an important defensive play for the Chargers.
The defense also benefited from consistent pressure on Smith, which helped make the Raiders’ passing offense more difficult to sustain.
Fumble Statistics
Geno Smith recorded one fumble, but the supplied statistics show that he did not lose possession.
The Raiders recovered the fumble.
Los Angeles recorded no fumbles in the supplied game statistics.
| Turnover Category | Raiders | Chargers |
| Interceptions recorded by offense | 1 | 1 |
| Interceptions made by defense | 1 | 1 |
| Fumbles | 1 | 0 |
| Fumbles lost | 0 | 0 |
Both teams intercepted one pass, and neither team recorded a lost fumble according to the supplied data.
Consequently, the decisive difference was not simply the turnover count.
The Chargers’ stronger rushing production and defensive pressure had a much greater influence on the overall result.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams contributed to field position and scoring throughout the contest.
The Chargers received productive return performances and converted all four extra-point attempts.
The Raiders also converted both of their extra points.
Chargers Kick Returns
Derius Davis handled the Chargers’ kick returns.
| Player | Returns | Yards | Average | Longest |
| Derius Davis | 3 | 88 | 29.3 | 30 |
Davis averaged 29.3 yards per return.
His three returns generated 88 total yards, providing Los Angeles with opportunities to begin offensive possessions from favorable field positions.
Raiders Kick Returns
| Player | Returns | Yards | Average | Longest |
| Dylan Laube | 3 | 79 | 26.3 | 27 |
| Raheem Mostert | 1 | 29 | 29.0 | 29 |
| Team Total | 4 | 108 | 27.0 | 29 |
Dylan Laube recorded 79 yards on three returns.
Raheem Mostert added 29 yards on one return.
The Raiders finished with 108 kick-return yards, compared with 88 for Los Angeles.
Although Las Vegas gained more total return yardage, it did not translate that advantage into a more productive offensive performance.
Punt Return Statistics
| Team | Player | Returns | Yards | Average |
| Raiders | Alex Bachman | 1 | 2 | 2.0 |
| Chargers | Derius Davis | 1 | 18 | 18.0 |
| Chargers | Troy Dye | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
Los Angeles recorded 18 total punt-return yards.
Derius Davis produced the longest punt return for either team with an 18-yard gain.
The Raiders recorded only two punt-return yards through Alex Bachman.
Kicking Performance
| Statistic | Cameron Dicker | Daniel Carlson |
| Field goals made | 1 | 0 |
| Field goals attempted | 1 | 0 |
| Field goal percentage | 100% | N/A |
| Longest field goal | 56 yards | N/A |
| Extra points made | 4 | 2 |
| Extra points attempted | 4 | 2 |
| Total kicking points | 7 | 2 |
Cameron Dicker had a productive afternoon for the Chargers.
He converted his only field-goal attempt, a 56-yard kick, and made all four extra points.
His seven kicking points represented a useful contribution to the final score.
Daniel Carlson made both of his extra-point attempts.
The supplied statistics do not show a field-goal attempt for Carlson.
Punting Comparison
| Statistic | JK Scott | AJ Cole |
| Punts | 2 | 4 |
| Total yards | 115 | 186 |
| Average | 57.5 | 46.5 |
| Longest punt | 58 | 51 |
| Touchbacks | 1 | 0 |
| Inside 20 | 0 | 2 |
JK Scott averaged 57.5 yards per punt on two attempts.
AJ Cole recorded four punts for 186 yards, averaging 46.5 yards.
Cole also placed two punts inside the 20-yard line.
The punting numbers suggest that the Raiders had more opportunities to use their punter, which is consistent with their difficulty sustaining offensive drives.
Team Statistical Comparison
Looking at individual players provides valuable information, but the team comparison explains why Los Angeles won.
The Chargers were more effective at running the football, generated more defensive pressure, and converted their offensive opportunities into a 31-point performance.
| Category | Chargers | Raiders |
| Final score | 31 | 14 |
| Passing yards, supplied team line | 149 | 165 |
| Individual passing totals | 160 | 165 |
| Rushing attempts | 43 | 18 |
| Rushing yards | 192 | 31 |
| Rushing average | 4.5 | 1.7 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 2 | 0 |
| Receiving touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| Total receptions | 16 | 18 |
| Sacks recorded by defense | 5 | 3 |
| Interceptions recorded by defense | 1 | 1 |
| Kick-return yards | 88 | 108 |
| Punt-return yards | 18 | 2 |
| Field goals | 1 | 0 |
| Extra points | 4 | 2 |
One important detail requires attention.
The supplied Chargers team passing line lists 149 yards, while Herbert’s 151 yards and Lance’s nine yards combine for 160 yards. The individual receiving statistics also add up to 160 yards.
Rather than silently changing the supplied figures, this article preserves the listed team total and identifies the discrepancy.
The Most Important Statistical Difference
The rushing comparison stands out more than any other category.
The Chargers recorded 192 rushing yards, while the Raiders managed only 31.
That difference meant Los Angeles could create offensive production through multiple running plays, while Las Vegas struggled to establish a reliable ground attack.
The Chargers also recorded two rushing touchdowns.
This gave their offense another scoring dimension and reduced the pressure on Herbert to produce every important play through passing.
Five Major Reasons the Chargers Defeated the Raiders
The final score reflected several connected advantages rather than one isolated performance.
1. Los Angeles Established a Powerful Running Game
The Chargers’ 192 rushing yards were the foundation of their victory.
Kimani Vidal recorded 126 yards, while Jaret Patterson contributed another 54.
Both players averaged close to five yards per carry.
Their combined production allowed Los Angeles to maintain offensive balance and create scoring opportunities.
The Raiders, on the other hand, could not consistently stop the running attack.
2. Kimani Vidal Produced Explosive Yardage
Vidal’s 59-yard longest run was one of the most significant individual statistical contributions.
His 126 total yards and one touchdown gave Los Angeles a reliable offensive weapon.
His performance also allowed the Chargers to distribute the offensive workload rather than relying exclusively on their quarterback.
3. Brock Bowers Was Effective but Needed More Support
Bowers was the Raiders’ leading offensive performer.
His four receptions produced 63 yards and two touchdowns.
However, the rest of the Raiders’ receiving group did not provide enough scoring production to compensate for the team’s overall offensive limitations.
The absence of a productive running game made the Raiders’ offense easier to defend.
4. The Chargers Generated More Defensive Pressure
Los Angeles recorded five sacks compared with three for Las Vegas.
The Chargers also finished with nine quarterback hits.
Tuli Tuipulotu played a major role with two sacks and four tackles for loss.
The additional pressure disrupted the Raiders’ passing rhythm and made it harder for Smith to maintain consistent drives.
5. Los Angeles Took Control in the Third Quarter
The Chargers entered halftime after allowing the Raiders to tie the game.
Their response after the break was decisive.
Los Angeles scored 14 points in the third quarter while keeping Las Vegas scoreless.
That period created a significant advantage that the Raiders could not overcome.
What the Player Statistics Reveal About Both Teams
Beyond the final score, the numbers offer useful insights into the offensive and defensive strengths displayed by both teams.
What the Chargers Did Well
Los Angeles demonstrated several positive characteristics.
Offensive balance: The Chargers recorded two rushing touchdowns and two passing touchdowns. Their ability to score through different offensive methods made them difficult to defend.
Running-back production: Vidal and Patterson combined for 180 rushing yards and two touchdowns.
Quarterback efficiency: Herbert completed 75% of his attempts and finished with a 108.5 passer rating.
Defensive pressure: Five sacks and nine quarterback hits placed considerable pressure on the Raiders’ offense.
Receiving distribution: McConkey, Johnston, Allen, and the other receivers provided multiple passing options.
The most important lesson from the Chargers’ performance was the value of balance.
An offense does not need an extremely high passing-yard total when its running game can consistently create first downs and scoring opportunities.
What the Raiders Could Improve
The Raiders’ statistics also highlight several areas that required attention.
Rushing consistency: Thirty-one rushing yards on 18 attempts was insufficient to support the passing game.
Quarterback protection: Five sacks resulted in 40 yards lost, creating difficult situations for Smith.
Offensive balance: The Raiders depended heavily on their passing offense, particularly Bowers’ receiving production.
Defensive containment: The defense allowed 192 rushing yards and two rushing touchdowns.
Second-half performance: The team failed to score in the third quarter, allowing Los Angeles to build a substantial advantage.
The most important improvement area was offensive balance.
Even an effective passing performance becomes less reliable when the opposing defense does not need to respect the running game.
Statistical Context: Why Individual Numbers Do Not Tell the Entire Story
One of the biggest mistakes when analyzing NFL box scores is treating the highest individual statistic as the most important measure of performance.
For example, Geno Smith finished with more passing yards than Justin Herbert.
However, the Chargers won by 17 points.
That difference becomes easier to understand when the complete offensive picture is considered.
Herbert operated behind a productive running game. Vidal and Patterson combined for 180 rushing yards, allowing the Chargers to maintain a balanced approach.
Smith did not receive the same support.
The Raiders managed only 31 rushing yards, which increased their dependence on passing plays.
Another important example is the defensive tackle count.
Jeremy Chinn led the game with 17 tackles, but the Raiders still allowed 31 points.
A high tackle total does not automatically indicate that a defense performed well. It may also reflect how frequently the opposing offense moved the football.
Similarly, Maxx Crosby recorded two sacks and four tackles for loss, yet his individual performance was not enough to stop Los Angeles.
These comparisons demonstrate why a complete statistical breakdown should include:
- Offensive efficiency.
- Rushing production.
- Quarterback pressure.
- Scoring contributions.
- Turnover information.
- Defensive disruption.
- Special teams performance.
Looking at these categories together provides a more reliable explanation of the final result.
Data Accuracy and Box Score Notes
When using player statistics for sports reporting, accuracy is particularly important.
The figures in this article are based on the supplied ESPN box score data for the November 30, 2025, matchup.
There is one notable inconsistency in the supplied information.
The Chargers’ team passing line lists:
- 16 completions on 21 attempts.
- 149 passing yards.
- 7.6 yards per attempt.
- Two passing touchdowns.
- One interception.
- Three sacks for 11 yards.
However, the individual quarterback entries show:
- Justin Herbert: 15 completions, 20 attempts, 151 passing yards.
- Trey Lance: One completion, one attempt, nine passing yards.
The individual quarterback yardage therefore totals 160 yards rather than 149.
The listed Chargers receiving totals also add up to 160 yards.
This article retains the supplied figures rather than presenting an unsupported correction.
For readers interested in checking the original game information, the ESPN NFL box score provides the relevant game reference.
This distinction matters because accurate sports reporting should make statistical discrepancies visible rather than hiding them.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Los Angeles Chargers vs Las Vegas Raiders game on November 30, 2025?
The Los Angeles Chargers defeated the Las Vegas Raiders 31-14 on November 30, 2025. Los Angeles scored 14 points in the third quarter and maintained its advantage through the final period.
2. How many rushing yards did Kimani Vidal record against the Raiders?
Kimani Vidal recorded 126 rushing yards on 25 carries. He averaged 5.0 yards per carry, scored one rushing touchdown, and recorded a longest run of 59 yards.
3. How many touchdowns did Brock Bowers score against the Chargers?
Brock Bowers recorded two receiving touchdowns. He finished with four receptions for 63 yards, averaging 15.8 yards per reception.
4. How many passing yards did Justin Herbert record?
Justin Herbert completed 15 of 20 passes for 151 yards and two touchdowns. He also threw one interception and finished with a 108.5 passer rating.
5. How many passing yards did Geno Smith record?
Geno Smith completed 18 of 23 passes for 165 yards and two touchdowns. He threw one interception and was sacked five times for a total loss of 40 yards.
6. Which team had more rushing yards in the game?
The Los Angeles Chargers had significantly more rushing yards. They recorded 192 yards on 43 carries, while the Las Vegas Raiders finished with only 31 yards on 18 attempts.
Conclusion
The November 30, 2025, matchup between Los Angeles and Las Vegas demonstrated the importance of offensive balance, rushing efficiency, and defensive pressure in the NFL. The Chargers secured a 31-14 victory by producing 192 rushing yards, scoring two rushing touchdowns, and creating consistent pressure against Geno Smith.
Kimani Vidal was the standout rushing performer with 126 yards and one touchdown, while Jaret Patterson added 54 yards and another score. Justin Herbert completed 75% of his passes and delivered two touchdown passes. On the Raiders’ side, Brock Bowers was the leading receiving threat, catching four passes for 63 yards and two touchdowns.
Maxx Crosby also delivered a strong defensive performance with two sacks and four tackles for loss, while Tuli Tuipulotu matched his two sacks and added four tackles for loss for Los Angeles.
Ultimately, the biggest difference was the Chargers’ ability to establish a productive ground game while limiting the Raiders to just 31 rushing yards. The defensive pressure, third-quarter scoring advantage, and balanced offensive production helped Los Angeles control the contest and secure a convincing divisional victory.
