76ers vs Cleveland Cavaliers Match Player Stats

The 76ers vs cleveland cavaliers match player stats from their January 15, 2026 meeting tell a much clearer story than the final score alone. Cleveland defeated Philadelphia 133-107 at Xfinity Mobile Arena, using efficient shooting, strong rebounding, 41 assists, and a dominant third quarter to pull away. Donovan Mitchell led all scorers with 35 points and added nine assists, while Evan Mobley produced an all-around performance with 17 points, 13 rebounds, six assists, and four blocks. For Philadelphia, Joel Embiid scored 20 points and Paul George added 17, but the 76ers struggled to convert consistently from the field and finished the game shooting only 40 percent.

This matchup is particularly useful for basketball fans who want more than a simple final score. The individual numbers show where the game changed, which players influenced the result, and why Cleveland was able to create such a large separation despite Philadelphia shooting 88 percent from the free throw line.

Table of Contents

76ers vs cleveland cavaliers match player stats: Game Overview

Cleveland entered the game with a 23-19 record, including a 9-9 road mark, while Philadelphia was 22-17 and 10-10 at home. The Cavaliers eventually won by 26 points, moving the season series to 2-0 in their favor after also winning the first meeting 132-121 on November 6.

The game was played at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia in front of 19,746 fans. Official game information and box-score listings can show January 14 or January 15 depending on the timestamp and listing format, but the contest was played Wednesday night in Philadelphia and was reported with January 15 game information.

Final Score

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Final
Cleveland Cavaliers	33	27	33	40	133
Philadelphia 76ers	18	29	28	32	107

Cleveland did not rely on one late scoring burst. The Cavaliers led 33-18 after the opening quarter, maintained a 13-point advantage at halftime, extended the lead again in the third quarter, and then scored 40 points in the fourth.

That progression is important because it shows that Philadelphia’s fourth-quarter scoring did not represent a genuine comeback. By that point, Cleveland had already established control.

Donovan Mitchell Leads Cleveland With 35 Points

Donovan Mitchell was the central figure in Cleveland’s offensive performance.

He finished with:

35 points
7 rebounds
9 assists
11-of-22 shooting
5-of-12 from three-point range
8-of-8 from the free throw line
1 steal
1 turnover
+29 plus/minus

Mitchell’s nine assists were especially important because his performance was not limited to scoring. He combined efficient perimeter shooting with playmaking and helped Cleveland generate 41 total assists.

His most important stretch came after halftime. Mitchell scored 20 points in the third quarter, shooting 6-of-10 from the field, 4-of-7 from three, and 4-of-4 from the free throw line. That offensive explosion helped Cleveland turn a manageable halftime advantage into a much larger lead.

This is one of the clearest examples of why raw scoring totals can sometimes undersell a player’s influence. Mitchell’s 35 points were obviously significant, but his nine assists also contributed to the Cavaliers’ efficient team offense.

Evan Mobley Provides a Complete Two-Way Performance

Evan Mobley was one of the most important players in the game even though Mitchell received most of the attention for his 35-point night.

Mobley’s final line was:

17 points
13 rebounds
6 assists
1 steal
4 blocks
7-of-10 field goals
1-of-1 from three
+27 plus/minus

The combination of 17 points, 13 rebounds, six assists, and four blocks demonstrates how many different areas Mobley influenced.

His 13 rebounds were the most by any player in the game. His four blocks also tied the highest individual block total in the contest, while his six assists were unusually valuable for a frontcourt player in a game where Cleveland finished with 41 assists.

Mobley also shot 70 percent from the field, making seven of his 10 attempts. That efficiency helped Cleveland avoid depending exclusively on Mitchell for offense.

From a statistical perspective, Mobley’s performance can be viewed as one of the strongest examples of an all-around contribution in this matchup. He was involved in scoring, rebounding, passing, and rim protection.

Darius Garland Adds 20 Points and Seven Assists

Darius Garland scored 20 points and recorded seven assists before leaving the game after injuring his right foot while diving for a loose ball.

Garland shot 8-of-13 from the field and connected on three of his seven three-point attempts. He also finished with three rebounds and one steal. His plus/minus was +10.

His performance was important because Cleveland had multiple reliable offensive creators rather than asking Mitchell to carry every possession.

Garland’s seven assists also contributed to the Cavaliers’ exceptional passing numbers. The team finished with 41 assists compared with Philadelphia’s 22.

That 19-assist difference is one of the most revealing statistics from the entire box score.

De’Andre Hunter Gives Cleveland Another Scoring Option

De’Andre Hunter finished with 17 points, four rebounds, four assists, and a +15 plus/minus.

His shooting efficiency was also useful. Hunter made seven of his 13 field-goal attempts and three of his seven attempts from three-point range.

Hunter’s contribution mattered because Cleveland did not have to rely on a single offensive player.

The Cavaliers had Mitchell scoring 35, Garland scoring 20, Mobley scoring 17, Hunter scoring 17, and Jaylon Tyson adding 12. That balance made it harder for Philadelphia to focus its defensive attention on one player.

Jaylon Tyson and Sam Merrill Add Efficient Contributions

Jaylon Tyson scored 12 points, grabbed five rebounds, and recorded three assists. He shot 4-of-9 from the field and made three of four three-point attempts.

Sam Merrill provided another perimeter threat from the bench. He scored nine points, grabbed four rebounds, handed out four assists, and made three of six three-point attempts.

These contributions illustrate an important feature of Cleveland’s offensive performance: the Cavaliers received production from multiple areas of the rotation.

Cleveland Cavaliers Team Statistics

The Cavaliers’ team numbers explain why the individual performances translated into such a decisive victory.

Category	Cavaliers	76ers
Points	133	107
Field Goals	50-95	36-89
FG Percentage	53%	40%
Three-Pointers	20-46	12-43
3PT Percentage	43%	28%
Free Throws	13-18	23-26
FT Percentage	72%	88%
Rebounds	52	42
Assists	41	22
Turnovers	15	12
Steals	6	9
Blocks	5	5

The biggest differences were field-goal shooting, three-point shooting, rebounding, and assists.

Cleveland made 50 field goals compared with Philadelphia’s 36. That 14-field-goal advantage was enormous.

The Cavaliers also made eight more three-pointers and shot 43 percent from outside compared with Philadelphia’s 28 percent.

Philadelphia did have advantages in free throw shooting and steals. The 76ers converted 23 of 26 free throws, while Cleveland made 13 of 18. Philadelphia also recorded nine steals compared with Cleveland’s six.

Those advantages were not enough to offset the much larger differences in overall shooting and ball movement.

Philadelphia 76ers Player Stats

Joel Embiid led Philadelphia in scoring with 20 points.

His final statistical line included:

20 points
4 rebounds
3 assists
1 steal
1 block
7-of-14 field goals
2-of-5 three-pointers
4-of-4 free throws
6 turnovers
-18 plus/minus

Embiid’s 20 points made him Philadelphia’s leading scorer, but the six turnovers were costly. He also finished with only four rebounds against a Cleveland team that collected 52 total rebounds.

One notable moment came when Embiid hit a three-pointer that helped him reach 13,000 career points, becoming the seventh player in 76ers history to reach that mark.

His individual scoring was therefore respectable, but the broader team numbers show why it was not enough to keep Philadelphia competitive.

Paul George Finishes With 17 Points

Paul George was Philadelphia’s second-highest scorer with 17 points.

He finished with:

17 points
4 rebounds
4 assists
1 steal
7-of-14 field goals
2-of-4 three-pointers
1-of-2 free throws
+/− of -8

George shot 50 percent from the field and 50 percent from three, making him one of Philadelphia’s more efficient offensive players in the game.

His four assists also tied the highest assist total among Philadelphia players in the game.

However, Philadelphia needed greater production from its overall offense because the team finished with only 36 made field goals.

Tyrese Maxey Records 14 Points

Tyrese Maxey scored 14 points, along with two rebounds, four assists, and two blocks.

He shot 5-of-16 from the field and 2-of-8 from three-point range. His plus/minus was -22, the lowest among Philadelphia’s five starters.

Maxey’s numbers demonstrate an important difference between volume and efficiency.

He attempted 16 shots, the second-highest total among Philadelphia players in the game, but converted only five of them. Against a Cleveland offense shooting 53 percent overall, Philadelphia needed more efficient production from its high-volume perimeter players.

VJ Edgecombe Contributes Across Several Categories

VJ Edgecombe finished with:

9 points
3 rebounds
2 assists
2 steals
1 block
3-of-10 shooting
1-of-6 from three
-18 plus/minus

His defensive statistics were useful, particularly the two steals and one block, but his offensive efficiency was limited.

Edgecombe’s two-way statistical line demonstrates why box-score analysis should include more than points. A player can contribute defensively even when the scoring numbers are modest.

Trendon Watford’s Rebounding and Playmaking

Trendon Watford recorded nine rebounds, making him Philadelphia’s top rebounder according to the supplied game data.

He also had four assists and scored three points in 17 minutes. His plus/minus was -5.

Watford’s rebounding contribution was valuable because Philadelphia needed help on the glass. The 76ers finished with 42 rebounds compared with Cleveland’s 52.

Interestingly, the nine-rebound figure was one of Philadelphia’s strongest individual statistical contributions despite Watford scoring only three points.

Kelly Oubre Jr. Adds Defensive Activity

Kelly Oubre Jr. finished with six points, five rebounds, two assists, and two steals.

He shot 2-of-6 from the field and 2-of-5 from three-point range.

His two steals were part of Philadelphia’s team total of nine steals, which exceeded Cleveland’s six.

However, his plus/minus was -19, reflecting the broader difficulty Philadelphia had maintaining an effective overall performance during his minutes.

What the Shooting Numbers Tell Us

The shooting comparison is arguably the clearest explanation for the 26-point difference.

Cleveland:

50-of-95 from the field
53 percent overall
20-of-46 from three
43 percent from three

Philadelphia:

36-of-89 from the field
40 percent overall
12-of-43 from three
28 percent from three

Cleveland therefore had both a higher shooting percentage and more shot attempts.

The Cavaliers’ 20 made three-pointers were especially damaging. Philadelphia made only 12.

That eight-three difference alone represents 24 points from made threes.

Philadelphia actually had the better free throw percentage, but free throws could not compensate for the Cavaliers’ advantage in field-goal and three-point production.

The Rebounding Battle Favored Cleveland

Cleveland collected 52 rebounds compared with Philadelphia’s 42.

That 10-rebound difference helped the Cavaliers control additional possessions and limited Philadelphia’s ability to generate second-chance opportunities.

Mobley was particularly important with 13 rebounds, while Jarrett Allen added five and Tyson contributed five.

Philadelphia’s best individual rebounder in the supplied data was Watford with nine, followed by Oubre with five.

The team rebounding gap was not enormous by itself, but combined with Cleveland’s shooting advantage, it became another part of a larger statistical pattern.

Cleveland’s 41 Assists Were a Major Storyline

One of the most impressive statistics in the box score was Cleveland’s 41 assists.

Philadelphia recorded only 22.

That means Cleveland assisted on a much larger share of its made field goals, reflecting an offense that consistently created opportunities through passing.

Mitchell had nine assists.

Garland had seven.

Mobley had six.

Hunter and Merrill each had four.

Tyson had three.

Allen had two.

This distribution matters because Cleveland was not simply relying on one primary playmaker.

Several players contributed to the team’s ball movement, allowing Cleveland to generate open shots and maintain offensive pressure.

Philadelphia’s Turnover Numbers Were Not the Main Problem

At first glance, Philadelphia’s 12 turnovers compared with Cleveland’s 15 might appear encouraging.

However, turnovers were not where the largest statistical difference occurred.

Philadelphia actually committed three fewer turnovers.

The problem was what happened on the possessions that did not end in turnovers.

The 76ers shot only 40 percent from the field and 28 percent from three.

Cleveland shot 53 percent overall and 43 percent from three.

This is an important lesson when analyzing box scores: the team with fewer turnovers does not automatically have the more efficient offense.

Shot quality and shot conversion can matter far more than a small turnover advantage.

Third Quarter Was the Turning Point

The third quarter was arguably the most important period of the game.

Cleveland scored 33 points.

Philadelphia scored 28.

The five-point quarter advantage does not appear enormous on its own, but the context is important.

Mitchell scored 20 points in the third quarter alone. Cleveland used that stretch to turn a 13-point halftime advantage into a much larger cushion.

The Cavaliers then entered the fourth quarter with enough separation to control the remainder of the contest.

This is why looking only at the final score can miss the flow of the game.

Cleveland did not suddenly win by 26 points in the final minutes. It built the advantage progressively.

Cleveland’s Fourth-Quarter Explosion

The Cavaliers scored 40 points in the fourth quarter.

Philadelphia scored 32.

Even after Cleveland had established a substantial advantage, its offense remained productive.

The 40-point quarter also explains why the final margin became 26 points rather than something closer to the 15 to 20-point range.

The fourth quarter was not the original source of Cleveland’s advantage, but it amplified it.

Plus/Minus Leaders

Plus/minus should always be interpreted within the context of the game, but it can still provide useful information.

Cleveland’s top plus/minus figures were:

Donovan Mitchell: +29
Evan Mobley: +27
Jarrett Allen: +16
De’Andre Hunter: +15
Darius Garland: +10
Jaylon Tyson: +10

Philadelphia’s starters finished with:

Paul George: -8
Dominick Barlow: -9
Joel Embiid: -18
Tyrese Maxey: -22
VJ Edgecombe: -18

The gap between Mitchell’s +29 and Maxey’s -22 is particularly noticeable, but plus/minus should not be interpreted as an isolated measure of individual ability.

It reflects what happened while a player was on the court and is affected by teammates, opponents, lineups, and game situation.

Comparing the Main Stars

A direct statistical comparison gives a useful snapshot.

Player	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	FG
Donovan Mitchell	35	7	9	1	0	11-22
Evan Mobley	17	13	6	1	4	7-10
Joel Embiid	20	4	3	1	1	7-14
Paul George	17	4	4	1	0	7-14
Tyrese Maxey	14	2	4	0	2	5-16

Mitchell clearly led the scoring and assists categories.

Mobley led the group in rebounding and blocks while shooting 70 percent from the field.

Embiid led Philadelphia in scoring.

George matched Embiid’s field-goal total while using the same number of attempts.

Maxey contributed four assists and two blocks but struggled with his shooting efficiency.

Why Cleveland’s Three-Point Shooting Mattered

Three-point shooting was one of the strongest separators in the game.

Cleveland made 20 three-pointers.

Philadelphia made 12.

That means Cleveland scored 60 points from three-point makes, compared with Philadelphia’s 36.

The Cavaliers also shot 43 percent from three, which made every defensive mistake around the perimeter more costly.

Philadelphia’s 28 percent three-point shooting made it difficult to match Cleveland’s scoring pace.

When one team combines high three-point volume with a strong conversion rate, the opponent generally needs either exceptional interior efficiency, superior offensive rebounding, or a major free throw advantage to compensate.

Philadelphia did shoot 88 percent from the free throw line, but that advantage was not large enough.

Why Philadelphia’s Free Throw Advantage Was Not Enough

Philadelphia made 23 of 26 free throws.

Cleveland made 13 of 18.

The 76ers therefore made 10 more free throws.

That is a significant advantage.

However, Cleveland’s field-goal advantage was much larger.

The Cavaliers made 14 more field goals overall and eight more three-pointers.

This is a useful reminder that a team can win the free throw battle and still lose the overall scoring efficiency battle.

Philadelphia’s 88 percent free throw shooting was excellent, but it could not compensate for the 13-percentage-point difference in overall field-goal accuracy.

A Closer Look at the Assist Gap

Cleveland’s 41 assists compared with Philadelphia’s 22 is arguably the most revealing team statistic.

The difference was 19 assists.

That gap indicates that Cleveland generated its offense collectively.

Mitchell was the leading facilitator with nine assists, but Mobley and Garland also played major roles.

This distribution prevented Philadelphia from focusing all of its defensive resources on one creator.

For Philadelphia, George and Maxey each recorded four assists, while several other players contributed smaller totals.

The 76ers therefore had less overall passing production despite having several capable creators.

What the Game Says About Individual Player Value

The player statistics show several different forms of value.

Mitchell demonstrated high-level scoring and playmaking.

Mobley demonstrated two-way versatility.

Garland provided efficient scoring and seven assists before leaving the game.

Hunter provided secondary scoring and passing.

Merrill supplied perimeter shooting and four assists in a reserve role.

For Philadelphia, Embiid remained the leading scorer.

George delivered an efficient 17 points.

Maxey provided 14 points and four assists but struggled with his shooting percentage.

Watford contributed nine rebounds and four assists.

Oubre added defensive activity through steals and rebounding.

The important point is that the box score does not suggest that every Philadelphia player performed poorly. Instead, it shows that Cleveland’s collective statistical profile was substantially stronger.

Season Series: Cleveland Leads 2-0

The January matchup was the second meeting between the teams during the season.

The first game ended with Cleveland defeating Philadelphia 132-121 on November 6.

The second meeting ended 133-107.

That gave Cleveland a 2-0 advantage in the season series after the January game.

The two results also show that Cleveland had scored at least 132 points in both meetings.

Philadelphia scored 121 points in the first game and 107 in the second.

That consistency in Cleveland’s offensive production is notable when looking at the matchup across more than one game.

Important Context Around the Game

The Cavaliers’ victory came with an injury-related development involving Darius Garland.

Garland left after injuring his right foot while diving for a loose ball late in the third quarter. He had already scored 20 points on 8-of-13 shooting before leaving.

Philadelphia also had a concerning moment involving Dominick Barlow, who needed assistance leaving the court after a hard fall during a driving attempt. The game report described his injury as a back contusion.

These events are relevant when interpreting the box score because individual minutes and fourth-quarter rotations can be influenced by injuries and the game situation.

The Most Important Numbers From the Match

For readers who want the fastest possible statistical summary, these are the numbers that best explain the game:

Final score: Cleveland 133, Philadelphia 107
Winning margin: 26 points
Cleveland field-goal percentage: 53 percent
Philadelphia field-goal percentage: 40 percent
Cleveland three-point percentage: 43 percent
Philadelphia three-point percentage: 28 percent
Cleveland rebounds: 52
Philadelphia rebounds: 42
Cleveland assists: 41
Philadelphia assists: 22
Donovan Mitchell: 35 points and 9 assists
Evan Mobley: 17 points and 13 rebounds
Darius Garland: 20 points and 7 assists
Joel Embiid: 20 points
Paul George: 17 points
Tyrese Maxey: 14 points
Cleveland’s largest listed plus/minus: Mitchell at +29
Philadelphia’s lowest listed starter plus/minus: Maxey at -22

Together, these numbers explain the outcome much better than the final score alone.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the 76ers and Cavaliers?

The Cleveland Cavaliers defeated the Philadelphia 76ers 133-107 at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia.

Who scored the most points in the game?

Donovan Mitchell led all scorers with 35 points for Cleveland. He also recorded nine assists and seven rebounds.

Who led the Cavaliers in rebounds?

Evan Mobley led Cleveland with 13 rebounds. He also finished with 17 points, six assists, one steal, and four blocks.

Who led Philadelphia in scoring?

Joel Embiid was Philadelphia’s leading scorer with 20 points. He shot 7-of-14 from the field and made all four of his free throw attempts.

How many assists did Cleveland have?

Cleveland recorded 41 assists, while Philadelphia finished with 22. The 19-assist difference was one of the largest statistical gaps in the game.

How did Cleveland win despite Philadelphia shooting better from the free throw line?

Philadelphia shot 88 percent from the free throw line compared with Cleveland’s 72 percent. However, Cleveland had much better overall field-goal and three-point shooting, making 50 field goals at 53 percent compared with Philadelphia’s 36 field goals at 40 percent.

Conclusion

The 76ers vs cleveland cavaliers match player stats reveal a game decided by several connected advantages rather than one isolated statistic.

Donovan Mitchell’s 35 points and nine assists gave Cleveland its primary offensive engine, while Evan Mobley’s 17-point, 13-rebound, six-assist, four-block performance added major value on both ends of the floor. Darius Garland contributed 20 points and seven assists before leaving with a foot injury, while De’Andre Hunter and Jaylon Tyson helped provide additional scoring.

Philadelphia received 20 points from Joel Embiid and 17 from Paul George, while Tyrese Maxey added 14. The 76ers also shot 88 percent from the free throw line and recorded nine steals. Those were positive statistical areas, but they were outweighed by Cleveland’s superior overall shooting, three-point accuracy, rebounding, and passing.

The biggest statistical separation came from the Cavaliers’ 53 percent field-goal shooting compared with Philadelphia’s 40 percent, their 43 percent three-point shooting compared with 28 percent, and their 41 assists compared with 22.

The 76ers vs cleveland cavaliers match player stats therefore provide a useful example of how a team can dominate a game through collective efficiency. Cleveland did not simply rely on Mitchell’s scoring. It combined efficient shooting, balanced scoring, strong interior production, perimeter accuracy, rebounding, and exceptional ball movement to produce a 133-107 victory.

For anyone analyzing this matchup, the most useful takeaway is to look beyond points. The combination of shooting percentage, three-point production, assists, rebounds, turnovers, and plus/minus provides a much clearer picture of how the game developed and why the Cavaliers created such a large separation.