Colts vs Texans Match Player Stats

The colts vs texans match player stats provide a useful snapshot of how the two AFC South teams entered this matchup, especially when the numbers are separated into passing, rushing, receiving, and defensive production. Based on the supplied ESPN (AU) data, Indianapolis and Houston both entered at 0-2, but their individual statistical profiles showed several important differences. Daniel Jones had 376 passing yards for Indianapolis, while C.J. Stroud had 627 for Houston. Jonathan Taylor had already produced 190 rushing yards and four touchdowns, while David Montgomery had 70 rushing yards and two scores. Those numbers give us a clearer way to understand the matchup beyond the win-loss records.

The statistical picture also highlights why individual production matters so much in an early NFL season. A team can be 0-2 while still having players producing at a high level. That is particularly relevant here because Taylor’s rushing efficiency, Stroud’s passing volume, Dalton Schultz’s receiving production, and the defensive work of players such as DeForest Buckner and Will Anderson Jr. all tell different parts of the story.

Important data note: the supplied dataset identifies the game as November 20, 2026 and labels it Week 3 at Reliant Stadium. Current official 2026 NFL and team schedule pages instead list Texans at Colts as Week 3 on September 27 at Lucas Oil Stadium, while the Colts at Texans matchup is scheduled for Week 11 on November 19. (Indianapolis Colts) The player statistics and injury information below therefore follow the real-data table supplied for this article, rather than replacing those figures with assumptions.

Table of Contents

Colts vs Texans Match Player Stats at a Glance

The supplied figures show the main statistical leaders on both sides.

Category	Indianapolis Colts	Houston Texans
Record	0-2	0-2
Passing leader	Daniel Jones	C.J. Stroud
Passing yards	376	627
Passing attempts/completions	62 / 41	93 / 56
Passing touchdowns	2	2
Interceptions	2	0
Rushing leader	Jonathan Taylor	David Montgomery
Rushing yards	190	70
Carries	43	26
Rushing touchdowns	4	2
Receiving leader	Josh Downs	Dalton Schultz
Receiving yards	109	175
Receptions	9	16
Sack leader	DeForest Buckner	Will Anderson Jr.
Sacks	1.5	1.5
Tackles leader	Akeem Davis-Gaither	Azeez Al-Shaair
Tackles	22	20

One of the most striking elements is the contrast between the passing and rushing production.

Houston’s passing leader has accumulated 251 more passing yards than Indianapolis’ leader in the supplied data. Indianapolis, however, has generated a much larger rushing contribution from its leading back.

That contrast matters because football production is rarely explained by one number. Passing volume, rushing workload, receiving efficiency, turnovers, defensive pressure, and game situation all interact.

Daniel Jones Passing Stats

Daniel Jones enters the statistical discussion with 376 passing yards on 41 completions from 62 attempts.

That works out to a completion rate of approximately 66.1%.

He has also recorded:

2 passing touchdowns
2 interceptions
376 passing yards
41 completions
62 attempts

The completion percentage is useful because it provides context for the raw yardage. A quarterback’s passing total alone does not show how efficiently those yards were accumulated.

Jones has also faced a meaningful turnover issue in the supplied numbers. His two interceptions equal his two touchdown passes, creating a 1:1 touchdown-to-interception ratio.

That does not tell us everything about his quarterback play, but it is an important statistic when examining the Colts’ early-season offensive profile.

Jones’ Passing Efficiency

With 376 yards on 62 attempts, Jones is averaging approximately 6.06 yards per attempt.

That figure gives a better picture of passing production than total yards alone.

For example, a quarterback who throws considerably more passes will naturally have more opportunities to accumulate yards. Looking at yards per attempt helps normalize the difference in workload.

Jones’ numbers therefore suggest a quarterback who has produced solid passing volume while also carrying some turnover risk.

The broader context is especially important because Indianapolis has also leaned heavily on Jonathan Taylor.

That means the Colts’ offense has not depended exclusively on throwing the football to generate production.

C.J. Stroud Passing Stats

C.J. Stroud has the largest passing workload in the supplied matchup data.

The Texans quarterback has recorded:

627 passing yards
56 completions
93 attempts
2 passing touchdowns
0 interceptions

His completion rate is approximately 60.2%, calculated from 56 completions on 93 attempts.

His average of approximately 6.74 yards per attempt is also higher than Jones’ 6.06 yards per attempt.

The most significant difference is volume.

Stroud has attempted 31 more passes than Jones and has completed 15 more passes. That extra workload helps explain why his total passing yardage is substantially higher.

At the same time, the zero-interception figure stands out.

What Stroud’s Numbers Tell Us

The passing data points toward a Houston offense that has placed considerable responsibility on its quarterback.

A total of 93 attempts across two games is substantial volume for an early-season sample.

That creates both opportunity and pressure.

More attempts can produce more passing yards and more chances to create explosive plays. But more attempts can also expose an offense to sacks, incompletions, interceptions, and negative plays.

Stroud’s supplied numbers show the upside of that workload without the corresponding interception total that Jones has recorded.

That is one of the clearest statistical differences between the two quarterbacks.

Jonathan Taylor’s Rushing Production

Jonathan Taylor is one of the most important players in the supplied colts vs texans match player stats.

His numbers are:

190 rushing yards
43 carries
4 rushing touchdowns

That equals approximately 4.42 yards per carry.

The touchdown total is particularly notable.

Taylor has scored four rushing touchdowns on 43 carries, meaning he has already been heavily involved in Indianapolis’ ground game and has converted that workload into points.

His 43 carries also represent 17 more rushing attempts than Montgomery’s 26.

That difference is important when comparing the two backfields.

Taylor’s workload indicates that Indianapolis has been willing to establish the run and keep its leading back involved throughout games.

Why Taylor’s Workload Matters

Running back statistics should always be viewed through workload as well as efficiency.

Taylor has not simply accumulated 190 yards through a handful of explosive plays. He has done it across 43 carries.

At 4.42 yards per attempt, his production combines substantial volume with consistent gains.

The four touchdowns add another layer.

A running back can produce strong yardage without scoring, while another can have fewer yards but make a larger contribution in the red zone. Taylor’s supplied statistics show both elements.

For Indianapolis, that makes his involvement one of the most important offensive variables in the matchup.

David Montgomery’s Rushing Stats

David Montgomery has recorded:

70 rushing yards
26 carries
2 touchdowns

His average is approximately 2.69 yards per carry.

That is considerably lower than Taylor’s 4.42 yards per carry in the supplied data.

However, Montgomery’s two touchdowns demonstrate that rushing efficiency and scoring production are separate measurements.

A running back can have a modest average while still making valuable contributions near the goal line.

His 26 carries also show that Houston has given him a meaningful rushing role.

Taylor vs. Montgomery

The statistical comparison is straightforward:

Metric	Jonathan Taylor	David Montgomery
Carries	43	26
Rushing yards	190	70
Yards per carry	4.42	2.69
Rushing TDs	4	2

Taylor leads in every listed rushing category.

That does not by itself determine which team will control the game, but it does show how differently the two running games have produced in the supplied sample.

Indianapolis has received both volume and efficiency from its leading runner.

Houston has received touchdown production from Montgomery despite a lower rushing average.

Josh Downs Receiving Production

Josh Downs leads the Colts in receiving production according to the supplied data.

His numbers include:

9 receptions
109 receiving yards

His average is approximately 12.1 yards per reception.

That is a useful middle ground between possession work and explosive production.

Nine receptions also indicate that Downs has been a frequent target in the Colts passing game.

When a receiver combines a high reception count with more than 100 yards, it generally indicates that the player has been consistently involved rather than depending entirely on one big play.

For Jones, having a reliable receiving option can be particularly important because the quarterback has already recorded significant passing volume.

Dalton Schultz Receiving Stats

Dalton Schultz leads Houston with:

16 receptions
175 receiving yards

That gives him an average of approximately 10.9 yards per reception.

The reception total is particularly notable.

Sixteen catches means Schultz has been involved frequently in the Texans’ passing attack.

His 175 yards also represent 66 more receiving yards than Downs has accumulated in the supplied numbers.

The comparison between the two players is interesting because Downs has the higher yards-per-reception figure, while Schultz has the greater overall reception and yardage totals.

Metric	Josh Downs	Dalton Schultz
Receptions	9	16
Receiving yards	109	175
Yards per reception	12.1	10.9

This is a good example of why player comparisons should not rely on one statistic.

Downs has produced more yards per catch.

Schultz has generated more total catches and receiving yards.

Both statistics describe different aspects of offensive involvement.

Defensive Player Stats

The defensive side of the colts vs texans match player stats deserves equal attention because quarterback and running-back numbers only explain part of the matchup.

DeForest Buckner

DeForest Buckner leads Indianapolis with 1.5 sacks in the supplied figures.

Sacks can influence a game in several ways:

They create lost yardage.
They can end promising drives.
They increase pressure on the quarterback.
They can create difficult down-and-distance situations.
They can contribute to turnovers when the quarterback loses control of the ball.

Buckner’s 1.5 sacks therefore provide a measurable indication of his impact as a pass rusher.

Will Anderson Jr.

Will Anderson Jr. also has 1.5 sacks for Houston.

That creates an identical sack total between the two defensive leaders.

The significance is less about declaring one player better and more about identifying a shared defensive pressure point.

Both teams have a defender capable of producing disruption in the passing game.

The matchup could therefore place additional importance on offensive line performance and quarterback decision-making.

Tackles Leaders

Indianapolis’ leading tackler in the supplied data is Akeem Davis-Gaither with 22 tackles.

Houston’s leader is Azeez Al-Shaair with 20 tackles.

The difference is only two tackles.

Team	Player	Tackles
Colts	Akeem Davis-Gaither	22
Texans	Azeez Al-Shaair	20

Tackle totals should not be interpreted as a complete measure of defensive quality.

A high tackle count can sometimes indicate that a defender is consistently around the football, but it can also reflect how frequently opponents run plays toward that player’s area or how much time the defense spends on the field.

That is why tackle totals are most useful when combined with sacks, turnovers, defensive efficiency, and game context.

Team Records Entering the Matchup

Both teams are listed at 0-2 in the supplied dataset.

That creates an important early-season AFC South context.

The standings provided are:

Team	Record	Win Percentage	Points For	Points Against
Jacksonville	1-1	.500	47	30
Houston	0-2	.000	37	56
Indianapolis	0-2	.000	53	74
Tennessee	0-2	.000	30	47

Indianapolis has scored 53 points compared with Houston’s 37.

However, Indianapolis has also allowed 74 points, compared with Houston’s 56.

That creates an important distinction.

The Colts have the higher point total despite both teams being winless in the supplied standings, but their points allowed figure is also higher.

This shows why record alone can be misleading when evaluating an early-season team.

Recent Colts Results

The supplied recent-results list gives Indianapolis the following five-game sequence:

Loss, 33-30 in overtime vs Kansas City
Loss, 41-23 vs Baltimore
Loss, 25-16 vs Detroit
Loss, 34-6 vs Atlanta
Tie, 13-13 vs New England

Across those five results, Indianapolis scored:

30 + 23 + 16 + 6 + 13 = 88 points

The team allowed:

33 + 41 + 25 + 34 + 13 = 146 points

That is a significant scoring differential over the supplied five-game sample.

The 33-30 overtime loss is particularly different from the 34-6 defeat because the games show very different competitive profiles.

That is why recent results should be read individually rather than simply counted as wins and losses.

Recent Texans Results

Houston’s supplied last five games are:

Loss, 20-6 vs Cincinnati
Loss, 36-31 vs Buffalo
Loss, 16-13 vs Carolina
Loss, 22-20 vs Las Vegas
Loss, 27-7 vs Los Angeles Chargers

Houston scored:

6 + 31 + 13 + 20 + 7 = 77 points

The Texans allowed:

20 + 36 + 16 + 22 + 27 = 121 points

The closest games in the supplied sequence were the losses to Las Vegas and Carolina.

The Buffalo game also produced 31 points from Houston, showing that the offense has demonstrated the ability to produce a larger scoring total even though the overall results in the listed sample are losses.

What the Passing Numbers Suggest

The passing comparison is one of the clearest areas of separation in the supplied statistics.

Stroud:

627 yards
56 completions
93 attempts
2 touchdowns
0 interceptions

Jones:

376 yards
41 completions
62 attempts
2 touchdowns
2 interceptions

Houston has generated considerably more passing volume.

Indianapolis has produced a higher completion percentage.

The Texans quarterback also has no interceptions in the supplied data.

That creates a statistical contrast between volume and ball security.

For readers analyzing box scores, this is an important lesson: total passing yards should never be viewed in isolation.

A better review combines:

Passing yards
Completion percentage
Yards per attempt
Touchdowns
Interceptions
Attempts
Game situation

Those figures together provide a much more useful picture of quarterback production.

What the Rushing Numbers Suggest

The rushing comparison moves in the opposite direction.

Taylor has:

190 yards
43 carries
4 touchdowns

Montgomery has:

70 yards
26 carries
2 touchdowns

Indianapolis’ leading rusher has therefore accumulated 120 more rushing yards.

Taylor has also averaged about 1.73 more yards per carry.

This suggests that the Colts’ ground game has been an important part of their offensive production in the supplied data.

Houston’s rushing attack has produced touchdowns, but Montgomery’s average is lower.

Again, the numbers describe production rather than guaranteeing what will happen in a future game.

The Receiving Battle

The leading receivers provide another useful contrast.

Schultz has:

16 receptions
175 yards

Downs has:

9 receptions
109 yards

Schultz leads by:

7 receptions
66 receiving yards

Downs leads in yards per reception by approximately 1.2 yards.

This distinction can help readers understand how passing offenses distribute production.

A receiver with many catches may be heavily involved as a possession option.

A receiver with fewer catches but a higher average can be generating more yardage per opportunity.

Neither statistic tells the entire story without targets, air yards, route participation, first downs, and touchdown production.

Injury Report and Availability

The supplied injury data lists several players whose status could affect the final matchup conditions.

Indianapolis Colts

The supplied Colts injury list includes:

Ashton Dulin: Questionable, ankle
Charvarius Ward: Questionable, groin
Alec Pierce: Out, heel
Micheal Clemons: Injured reserve, toe
Carson Towt: Injured reserve, undisclosed

Alec Pierce being listed as out is particularly relevant when considering Indianapolis’ receiving options because the Colts’ passing game already has significant statistical concentration among its leading contributors.

The questionable designations should be treated differently from confirmed absences because a questionable player may still become available.

Houston Texans

Houston’s supplied injury list includes:

M.J. Stewart: PUP-R, quadriceps
Logan Hall: Questionable, knee
Trent Brown: Questionable, knee
Nico Collins: Questionable, hamstring
Jake Hummel: Questionable, groin

The status of a major offensive contributor can materially change how a team’s receiving production is distributed.

However, an injury designation alone should not be interpreted as confirmation that a player will miss the game.

Official active/inactive lists are the appropriate final reference before kickoff. The NFL’s official team and game pages can be used for current schedule and status information. (NFL)

ESPN Matchup Predictor

The supplied ESPN matchup predictor gives:

Indianapolis Colts: 37.5%
Houston Texans: 62.2%

These figures are included here as supplied data, not as a prediction or guarantee of the final result.

A matchup predictor is also different from player statistics.

Player stats describe what has already happened in the supplied sample.

A predictor is an analytical estimate based on a model and available inputs.

Readers should therefore keep the two concepts separate.

Key Statistical Storylines

Several themes stand out when the numbers are viewed together.

1. Houston has more passing volume

Stroud’s 93 attempts compared with Jones’ 62 show a substantial difference in offensive workload through the air.

2. Indianapolis has more rushing production

Taylor’s 190 yards are far ahead of Montgomery’s 70.

3. Taylor has been a major scoring contributor

His four rushing touchdowns are double Montgomery’s two.

4. Houston’s leading receiver has more total production

Schultz has 175 yards and 16 catches, compared with Downs’ 109 yards and nine catches.

5. Both defenses have a 1.5-sack leader

Buckner and Anderson Jr. are tied at 1.5 sacks in the supplied figures.

6. Turnovers separate the quarterbacks

Jones has two interceptions.

Stroud has none.

That is an important difference despite both quarterbacks having two touchdown passes.

How to Read Colts vs Texans Match Player Stats Correctly

A common mistake when reading NFL statistics is focusing only on the player with the largest number.

A better approach is to look for relationships.

For example, Jones has fewer passing yards than Stroud, but his completion rate is higher.

Taylor has dramatically more rushing yards than Montgomery, while both have scored multiple rushing touchdowns.

Schultz has more receptions and receiving yards than Downs, while Downs has a higher yards-per-reception average.

These relationships provide much more information than simply listing statistical leaders.

Start With Volume

First look at attempts, carries, targets, and receptions.

Volume tells you how often the offense is involving a player.

Then Check Efficiency

Next, examine:

Yards per attempt
Yards per carry
Yards per reception
Completion percentage

Efficiency helps explain how much production players are getting from their opportunities.

Then Examine Scoring

Touchdowns matter because they convert yardage and possessions into points.

Taylor’s four rushing touchdowns are therefore important context for his 190 rushing yards.

Finally, Check Turnovers and Defensive Pressure

Interceptions and sacks can dramatically change games.

That makes Jones’ two interceptions and the 1.5 sacks recorded by both Buckner and Anderson Jr. meaningful pieces of the statistical picture.

Why Individual Stats Matter in an AFC South Matchup

Divisional games often carry extra importance because teams repeatedly encounter familiar opponents and coaching staffs.

But the value of player statistics goes beyond divisional context.

Individual numbers help identify where a team is generating production and where it may be vulnerable.

For Indianapolis, the supplied numbers point toward significant rushing production and a receiving contribution led by Downs.

For Houston, the numbers point toward high passing volume and strong receiving totals from Schultz.

On defense, both teams have a leading pass rusher with 1.5 sacks.

Those are the measurable areas to monitor when evaluating how the matchup develops.

What to Watch in the Box Score

Once the game is played, several numbers will be especially useful for evaluating whether the statistical trends continued.

Quarterback efficiency

Watch completion percentage, yards per attempt, touchdowns, and interceptions.

Rushing workload

Taylor’s carry count is important because his supplied production has been strongly connected to volume.

Third-down performance

Third-down conversions can explain why one offense sustains drives while another struggles to stay on the field.

Red-zone efficiency

Taylor and Montgomery have already combined for six rushing touchdowns in the supplied data, making scoring efficiency worth tracking.

Defensive pressure

Buckner and Anderson Jr. are the supplied sack leaders, so quarterback pressure could be another key statistical category.

Turnover margin

Turnovers can change the value of otherwise strong offensive statistics.

A team can gain more yards but still lose if it gives away possessions at critical moments.

A Practical Way to Compare the Teams

For readers who want to evaluate the matchup themselves, the following framework is useful:

Offense

Passing yards
Rushing yards
Total yards
Points
Third-down conversion rate
Red-zone touchdowns

Quarterback

Completion percentage
Yards per attempt
Touchdowns
Interceptions
Sacks

Skill players

Carries
Targets
Receptions
Receiving yards
Touchdowns
Yards after catch

Defense

Sacks
Tackles
Interceptions
Forced fumbles
Third-down stops
Points allowed

This approach makes it easier to understand why a game developed the way it did rather than relying on a single headline statistic.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the Colts vs Texans match player stats?

The supplied statistics list Daniel Jones with 376 passing yards for Indianapolis and C.J. Stroud with 627 for Houston. Jonathan Taylor leads the Colts with 190 rushing yards, while David Montgomery leads Houston with 70.

Who leads the Colts in rushing?

Jonathan Taylor leads Indianapolis with 190 rushing yards on 43 carries and four rushing touchdowns in the supplied data.

Who leads the Texans in passing?

C.J. Stroud leads Houston with 627 passing yards on 56 completions from 93 attempts, with two touchdowns and no interceptions in the supplied figures.

Who leads the Colts in receiving?

Josh Downs leads the Colts with nine receptions for 109 receiving yards.

Who leads the Texans in receiving?

Dalton Schultz leads Houston with 16 receptions for 175 receiving yards.

Which players lead in sacks?

DeForest Buckner leads Indianapolis with 1.5 sacks, while Will Anderson Jr. leads Houston with 1.5 sacks in the supplied statistics.

Conclusion

The colts vs texans match player stats show two teams with very different statistical profiles.

Indianapolis has received strong rushing production from Jonathan Taylor, who has 190 yards and four touchdowns on 43 carries. Daniel Jones has added 376 passing yards, while Josh Downs leads the Colts’ receiving group with 109 yards.

Houston has leaned more heavily on its passing game. C.J. Stroud has 627 passing yards from 93 attempts, with two touchdowns and no interceptions. Dalton Schultz has added 175 receiving yards and 16 receptions, while David Montgomery has contributed 70 rushing yards and two touchdowns.

The defensive numbers are comparatively close at the top, with DeForest Buckner and Will Anderson Jr. both recording 1.5 sacks. Akeem Davis-Gaither leads Indianapolis with 22 tackles, while Azeez Al-Shaair leads Houston with 20.

The supplied data also shows why a complete player-stat analysis needs more than a simple list of leaders. Volume, efficiency, scoring, turnovers, injuries, and recent form all provide different pieces of the picture.

For readers tracking this matchup, the most useful approach is to monitor how those individual trends translate into team-level production once the game is underway.

NFL official Colts-Texans game information