Portland Trail Blazers vs Golden State Warriors Player Stats
The portland trail blazers vs golden state warriors match player stats tell the story of a game that quickly turned from a competitive opening period into a commanding Portland performance. The Trail Blazers defeated the Warriors 139-119 at Moda Center, using a 41-point second quarter, efficient shooting, strong ball movement, and a major advantage in points in the paint. Deni Avdija led Portland with 26 points and 6 assists, while Stephen Curry produced 35 points for Golden State.
The game was played in Portland on October 24, 2025, with the NBA’s game information also carrying an October 25 timestamp in some listings. The official NBA record lists Portland’s 139-119 victory at Moda Center, with an attendance of 18,090. official NBA game box score
For anyone researching the portland trail blazers vs golden state warriors match player stats, the most important point is that the final score was not simply the result of one star having a big night. Curry scored 35, but Portland received major contributions from several players and converted those contributions into a much more efficient offensive performance.
Portland Trail Blazers vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats
Portland finished the game with 139 points on 50-of-93 shooting, which equaled 53.8 percent from the field. The Trail Blazers also made 16 of 34 three-point attempts for 47.1 percent and converted 23 of 25 free throws for 92 percent.
Golden State scored 119 points while shooting 35 of 80 from the field, or 43.8 percent. The Warriors also made 16 three-pointers on 38 attempts, producing a respectable 42.1 percent from beyond the arc. Their free-throw shooting was also strong at 33 of 39, or 84.6 percent.
The difference came from how consistently Portland created efficient scoring opportunities.
| Team | FG | FG% | 3PT | 3PT% | FT | FT% | REB | AST | TO | STL | BLK |
| Portland Trail Blazers | 50-93 | 53.8% | 16-34 | 47.1% | 23-25 | 92.0% | 38 | 30 | 18 | 13 | 5 |
| Golden State Warriors | 35-80 | 43.8% | 16-38 | 42.1% | 33-39 | 84.6% | 41 | 24 | 25 | 12 | 3 |
One of the clearest statistical indicators is the field-goal attempt gap. Portland attempted 93 shots compared with 80 for Golden State. That 13-shot difference is significant in a 20-point game.
The Warriors were not inefficient from three-point range. In fact, both teams made exactly 16 three-pointers. Portland simply converted more of its overall possessions into successful field goals and created substantially more scoring inside the arc.
Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
The game began evenly, with both teams scoring 28 points in the opening quarter.
| Quarter | Golden State | Portland |
| 1st | 28 | 28 |
| 2nd | 28 | 41 |
| 3rd | 35 | 34 |
| 4th | 28 | 36 |
| Final | 119 | 139 |
The second quarter was the turning point.
Portland scored 41 points while Golden State managed 28. That created a 13-point halftime advantage after the teams had been tied at 28 following the first period.
The Warriors did respond offensively in the third quarter, scoring 35 points. However, Portland still scored 34, meaning Golden State did not meaningfully reduce the deficit.
Portland then finished the fourth quarter with another 36 points.
This sequence matters when analyzing the portland trail blazers vs golden state warriors match player stats because it shows that the result was not caused by one short scoring burst. Portland’s advantage developed over multiple quarters and was maintained throughout the second half.
Deni Avdija’s 26-Point Performance
Deni Avdija was Portland’s leading scorer with 26 points.
His shooting line was particularly impressive:
- 26 points
- 11-of-18 field goals
- 4-of-6 from three-point range
- 5 rebounds
- 6 assists
- 3 turnovers
- 4 personal fouls
- +16 plus/minus
Avdija shot 61.1 percent from the field and 66.7 percent from three-point range.
What makes his performance especially useful for understanding the game is the combination of scoring and playmaking. He was not simply finishing possessions. Six assists show that he also contributed to Portland’s offensive creation.
His 11 made field goals were the most on either team.
Avdija also helped Portland maintain offensive pressure because Golden State could not treat him as a one-dimensional scorer. His ability to score efficiently while creating opportunities for teammates made him one of the central pieces of Portland’s attack.
Stephen Curry Leads Golden State With 35 Points
Stephen Curry was the highest-scoring player in the game with 35 points.
His shooting numbers were:
- 35 points
- 12-of-22 field goals
- 7-of-14 three-pointers
- 4-of-4 free throws
- 6 rebounds
- 3 assists
Curry shot 54.5 percent from the field and 50 percent from three-point range.
Seven made three-pointers demonstrate how effectively he generated offense from distance. Yet his individual scoring was not enough to overcome Portland’s overall offensive production.
This is an important distinction when reading player statistics. A team can have the highest individual scorer and still lose by 20 points. Curry’s 35 points accounted for a substantial portion of Golden State’s offense, but Portland had more players contributing efficiently across the lineup.
The Warriors also committed 25 turnovers, which limited the value of their strong three-point shooting.
Portland’s Supporting Scorers
Portland did not depend entirely on Avdija.
Jerami Grant scored 22 points, Toumani Camara added 19, Shaedon Sharpe scored 17, Donovan Clingan had 14, Kris Murray scored 13, and Jrue Holiday finished with 12 points and 11 assists.
That distribution gave Portland several ways to attack.
| Portland Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | FG |
| Deni Avdija | 26 | 5 | 6 | 11-18 |
| Jerami Grant | 22 | 2 | 2 | 6-10 |
| Toumani Camara | 19 | 7 | 2 | 7-13 |
| Shaedon Sharpe | 17 | 4 | 1 | 5-15 |
| Donovan Clingan | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4-6 |
| Kris Murray | 13 | 1 | 1 | 6-7 |
| Jrue Holiday | 12 | 5 | 11 | 5-12 |
| Matisse Thybulle | 10 | 2 | 0 | 3-3 |
The distribution is particularly notable because seven Portland players scored at least 12 points.
That made it difficult for Golden State to slow Portland by focusing on one scorer.
Jerami Grant Provides Efficient Scoring
Grant finished with 22 points on 6-of-10 shooting.
He also made 2 of 4 three-point attempts and went 8-of-10 from the free-throw line.
His 22 points were the second-highest total on Portland.
Grant’s contribution was important because he provided another high-efficiency scoring option alongside Avdija. His ability to convert both field goals and free throws helped Portland sustain its offensive pressure.
Toumani Camara Impacts Multiple Areas
Camara scored 19 points and added 7 rebounds and 2 assists.
He shot 7 of 13 from the field and made 3 of 7 three-point attempts.
His statistical profile demonstrates the broader nature of Portland’s performance. He was not asked only to score. His rebounding and defensive activity also contributed to the overall balance of the team.
Camara recorded 3 steals, the highest total among Portland players.
Jrue Holiday Controls the Offense
Jrue Holiday’s 12 points do not fully describe his influence.
He finished with 11 assists, giving him a double-double and making him Portland’s primary assist leader.
Holiday shot 5 of 12 from the field and made 2 of 4 three-pointers.
His 11 assists were more than the entire total of some players’ scoring contributions, and they help explain why Portland finished with 30 assists as a team.
When a team shoots 53.8 percent and records 30 assists, efficient scoring is usually connected to the quality of the possessions being created. Holiday’s playmaking was a major component of that process.
Donovan Clingan Controls the Interior
Clingan produced 14 points and 8 rebounds while shooting 4 of 6 from the field.
He also made all five of his free throws.
His 8 rebounds tied for Portland’s team high.
Clingan’s production is particularly relevant because Portland scored 66 points in the paint compared with 30 for Golden State. That 36-point difference in interior scoring was one of the clearest statistical reasons for Portland’s victory.
Golden State’s Supporting Production
Curry led the Warriors, but Golden State did receive meaningful contributions from several players.
| Golden State Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | FG |
| Stephen Curry | 35 | 6 | 3 | 12-22 |
| Jonathan Kuminga | 16 | 8 | 3 | 4-7 |
| Jimmy Butler III | 14 | 3 | 4 | 3-7 |
| Draymond Green | 12 | 3 | 5 | 4-7 |
| Brandin Podziemski | 8 | 5 | 0 | 2-9 |
| Moses Moody | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1-6 |
| Will Richard | 7 | 2 | 2 | 2-4 |
| Trayce Jackson-Davis | 6 | 4 | 1 | 2-5 |
| Quinten Post | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2-4 |
| Pat Spencer | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2-4 |
| Gui Santos | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 |
| Buddy Hield | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0-2 |
| Gary Payton II | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 |
Jonathan Kuminga Adds 16 Points
Kuminga finished with 16 points, 8 rebounds and 3 assists.
He shot 4 of 7 from the field and made all seven of his free throws.
His 8 rebounds were tied with Curry’s 6 and gave Golden State useful frontcourt production.
However, Kuminga could not match the volume of Portland’s secondary scoring.
Draymond Green’s Passing and Shooting
Green finished with 12 points and 5 assists.
He shot 4 of 7 from the field and 3 of 4 from three-point range.
His three-point shooting was excellent at 75 percent, although his overall impact was affected by five turnovers.
The contrast between Green’s five assists and five turnovers illustrates why traditional box-score categories need context. His passing created opportunities, but lost possessions also removed opportunities from the Warriors.
Jimmy Butler III Reaches 14 Points
Butler scored 14 points on 3-of-7 shooting.
He also contributed 3 rebounds and 4 assists.
His most productive area was the free-throw line, where he converted 8 of 10 attempts.
Golden State therefore had three players in Curry, Kuminga and Butler who combined for 65 points. The issue was that Portland’s scoring was spread across more players while the Trail Blazers also produced superior overall shooting efficiency.
Shooting Efficiency Was a Major Difference
The team shooting comparison provides one of the clearest explanations for the final score.
Portland shot 53.8 percent from the field.
Golden State shot 43.8 percent.
That is a 10-percentage-point difference.
Both teams made 16 three-pointers, so the game was not decided because Portland simply hit more threes.
Instead, Portland’s advantage came from its overall shot-making.
Portland attempted 93 field goals and made 50.
Golden State attempted 80 and made 35.
The Trail Blazers therefore made 15 more field goals overall.
That is a much larger difference than the three-point totals suggest.
Points in the Paint Explain the Interior Advantage
Portland scored 66 points in the paint.
Golden State scored 30.
That produced a 36-point advantage for Portland in this category.
The significance is straightforward. Even though Golden State had an excellent three-point night by normal standards, Portland repeatedly found efficient scoring opportunities closer to the basket.
This also helps explain why the Trail Blazers could build a lead without relying exclusively on outside shooting.
Portland’s 16 three-pointers were valuable, but the team had multiple offensive routes available.
Turnovers Created a Possession Gap
Golden State committed 25 turnovers.
Portland committed 18.
That gave the Trail Blazers a seven-turnover advantage.
Portland also recorded 13 steals compared with 12 for Golden State.
The combination of turnovers and steals mattered because every lost possession can prevent a scoring opportunity while potentially creating one for the opponent.
Golden State’s 25 turnovers were particularly costly in a game where Portland was already shooting 53.8 percent.
When a team is both efficient from the field and receiving additional opportunities through turnovers, its offensive ceiling becomes much higher.
Assists Show Portland’s Ball Movement
Portland recorded 30 assists.
Golden State recorded 24.
The six-assist difference is not enormous by itself, but it fits the broader offensive picture.
Portland’s 30 assists came alongside 50 made field goals. That means a large portion of the team’s successful shots were connected to passing.
Holiday led the way with 11 assists.
Avdija added 6.
Blake Wesley contributed 4.
This created multiple playmaking sources rather than forcing one guard to create nearly everything.
Golden State had 24 assists, with Green leading the team at 5 and Butler contributing 4.
Rebounding Comparison
Golden State actually won the overall rebounding battle.
The Warriors collected 41 rebounds.
Portland collected 38.
| Rebounding Category | Golden State | Portland |
| Total Rebounds | 41 | 38 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 12 | 10 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 29 | 28 |
This is an important reminder that the final result cannot be explained by saying Portland dominated every statistical category.
Golden State had three more total rebounds and two more offensive rebounds.
The Warriors simply did not convert that advantage into enough overall scoring efficiency.
Portland’s 139 points show that shooting, interior scoring, assists and turnover control outweighed the modest rebounding disadvantage.
Free-Throw Shooting
Both teams shot well from the free-throw line.
Portland converted 23 of 25 attempts for 92 percent.
Golden State converted 33 of 39 for 84.6 percent.
Interestingly, Golden State made 10 more free throws.
That means Portland’s victory was not based on winning the free-throw battle.
Instead, the Trail Blazers built their advantage through field-goal production and efficiency.
Portland made 15 more field goals overall, while both teams made 16 three-pointers.
That is a useful lesson when analyzing a high-scoring NBA game. Free throws can be important without being the main reason one team wins.
Portland’s Bench Production
Portland also received valuable scoring from its supporting group.
Kris Murray scored 13 points on 6-of-7 shooting, including 1-of-1 from three-point range.
Matisse Thybulle scored 10 points while going 3-for-3 from the field and 2-for-2 from three-point range.
Blake Wesley scored 4 points and added 4 assists.
Yang Hansen scored 2 points.
Rayan Rupert and Duop Reath finished without points.
The efficiency of Murray and Thybulle stands out.
Murray made six field goals from only seven attempts. Thybulle did not miss a field-goal attempt.
Those contributions helped Portland maintain its offensive efficiency beyond the primary scoring options.
Golden State’s Bench Numbers
Golden State’s bench was less efficient overall.
Brandin Podziemski scored 8 points on 2-of-9 shooting.
Moses Moody scored 7 points on 1-of-6 shooting.
Will Richard scored 7 points on 2-of-4 shooting.
Trayce Jackson-Davis added 6 points on 2-of-5 shooting.
Quinten Post scored 5 points on 2-of-4 shooting.
Pat Spencer added 4 points.
Gui Santos scored 3.
Buddy Hield scored 2, while Gary Payton II did not score.
The important point is not that every reserve needed to score heavily. Rather, Portland received efficient contributions from several players while Golden State struggled to maintain the same shooting efficiency across its rotation.
Players Who Did Not Play
Portland’s available rotation was affected by several absences.
Robert Williams III did not play because of a left Achilles tendon issue.
Damian Lillard did not play because of a left hamstring tear.
Scoot Henderson was unavailable while going through return-to-competition reconditioning.
These absences are part of the context surrounding the box score, but the players who were on the floor ultimately produced enough offense to win comfortably.
For a player-stat analysis, it is important to distinguish between players who recorded zero points while playing and players who did not enter the game.
What the Plus-Minus Numbers Show
Portland’s team plus-minus was +20 because of the 20-point victory.
Several Portland players posted particularly strong individual plus-minus numbers.
Camara finished at +23.
Thybulle finished at +22.
Avdija finished at +16.
The plus-minus numbers should not be treated as a standalone measure of individual performance. They reflect what happened while a player was on the court and can be influenced by teammates, opponents, rotations and game situation.
Still, the figures support the broader observation that Portland’s strongest lineups were able to create separation.
What the Game Says About Portland’s Offense
The most revealing feature of Portland’s offense was balance.
The Trail Blazers had:
- 50 made field goals
- 16 made three-pointers
- 30 assists
- 139 total points
- 53.8 percent field-goal shooting
- 66 points in the paint
- 18 turnovers
That combination shows an offense that succeeded both inside and outside.
Portland did not need to choose between attacking the basket and shooting threes. It did both effectively.
Avdija provided scoring and playmaking.
Grant supplied efficient scoring.
Camara contributed points, rebounds and steals.
Holiday organized the offense.
Clingan supplied interior production.
Murray and Thybulle added highly efficient shooting.
That variety made the Trail Blazers difficult to contain.
What the Game Says About Golden State
Golden State’s statistics present a more complicated picture.
The Warriors shot 42.1 percent from three-point range and 84.6 percent from the free-throw line.
Curry had 35 points.
Kuminga had 16 points and 8 rebounds.
Green had 12 points and 5 assists.
The problem was that those positives were offset by 25 turnovers and a 43.8 percent overall field-goal percentage.
Golden State also scored only 30 points in the paint.
The Warriors therefore had a strong perimeter scoring component but could not match Portland’s total shot-making and interior production.
Why the Second Quarter Changed the Game
The second quarter deserves special attention.
Portland entered the quarter tied 28-28.
By halftime, the Trail Blazers led 69-56.
That means Portland outscored Golden State by 13 points during a single period.
The quarter was the game’s largest structural shift.
Avdija’s scoring was especially important during the first half, while Grant also supplied major production.
Once Portland established the 13-point halftime lead, Golden State needed a major third-quarter response.
The Warriors scored 35 points in the third, but Portland scored 34.
That meant the deficit remained essentially intact.
The game was therefore decided less by a dramatic late collapse and more by Portland’s ability to establish a substantial advantage and prevent Golden State from reversing it.
Portland’s Offensive Formula
Looking at the full set of statistics, Portland’s winning formula can be summarized through five connected areas:
- Efficient shooting: Portland made 53.8 percent of its field goals.
- Interior scoring: The Trail Blazers scored 66 points in the paint.
- Ball movement: Portland recorded 30 assists.
- Turnover control: Portland committed 18 turnovers compared with 25 by Golden State.
- Balanced scoring: Seven Portland players scored at least 12 points.
None of these categories alone explains a 20-point victory.
Together, they provide a much clearer picture.
Golden State’s Offensive Formula
Golden State’s approach relied heavily on perimeter scoring and individual shot creation.
The Warriors made 16 three-pointers.
Curry made seven.
Green made three.
The team shot 42.1 percent from three-point range.
However, the Warriors’ overall field-goal percentage fell to 43.8 percent, and the team committed 25 turnovers.
That combination made it difficult to keep pace with Portland’s 139-point output.
Full Portland Player Stat Breakdown
For readers searching specifically for the portland trail blazers vs golden state warriors match player stats, the following table provides a compact reference for Portland.
| Player | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT | FT |
| Deni Avdija | 26 | 5 | 6 | 11-18 | 4-6 | 0-0 |
| Jerami Grant | 22 | 2 | 2 | 6-10 | 2-4 | 8-10 |
| Toumani Camara | 19 | 7 | 2 | 7-13 | 3-7 | 2-2 |
| Shaedon Sharpe | 17 | 4 | 1 | 5-15 | 1-6 | 6-6 |
| Donovan Clingan | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 5-5 |
| Kris Murray | 13 | 1 | 1 | 6-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Jrue Holiday | 12 | 5 | 11 | 5-12 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Matisse Thybulle | 10 | 2 | 0 | 3-3 | 2-2 | 2-2 |
| Blake Wesley | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Yang Hansen | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Rayan Rupert | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Duop Reath | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Robert Williams III, Damian Lillard and Scoot Henderson did not play.
Full Golden State Player Stat Breakdown
The Warriors’ player numbers provide an equally useful reference.
| Player | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT | FT |
| Stephen Curry | 35 | 6 | 3 | 12-22 | 7-14 | 4-4 |
| Jonathan Kuminga | 16 | 8 | 3 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 7-7 |
| Jimmy Butler III | 14 | 3 | 4 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 8-10 |
| Draymond Green | 12 | 3 | 5 | 4-7 | 3-4 | 1-2 |
| Brandin Podziemski | 8 | 5 | 0 | 2-9 | 1-3 | 3-4 |
| Moses Moody | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1-6 | 0-2 | 5-6 |
| Will Richard | 7 | 2 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 2-2 |
| Trayce Jackson-Davis | 6 | 4 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| Quinten Post | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Pat Spencer | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Gui Santos | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Buddy Hield | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
| Gary Payton II | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Key Statistical Takeaways
The most useful numbers from the game can be summarized as follows:
Final score: Portland 139, Golden State 119
Leading scorer: Stephen Curry, 35 points
Portland leading scorer: Deni Avdija, 26 points
Portland assist leader: Jrue Holiday, 11 assists
Portland rebound leader: Donovan Clingan, 8 rebounds
Golden State rebound leader: Jonathan Kuminga, 8 rebounds
Portland field-goal percentage: 53.8 percent
Golden State field-goal percentage: 43.8 percent
Portland three-point percentage: 47.1 percent
Golden State three-point percentage: 42.1 percent
Portland assists: 30
Golden State assists: 24
Portland turnovers: 18
Golden State turnovers: 25
Portland points in the paint: 66
Golden State points in the paint: 30
Attendance: 18,090
Season Series Context
This game was the first meeting between the teams in the season series at the time represented by the supplied data.
Portland therefore took a 1-0 lead in the season series with the 139-119 victory.
The result also moved Portland to a 1-1 record according to the supplied game data, while Golden State entered the game at 2-1 and left with its first loss of the season.
The season-series record should be separated from the individual game analysis. One game provides a detailed snapshot of performance, but it does not by itself establish a team’s full-season level.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who led the Portland Trail Blazers in scoring?
Deni Avdija led Portland with 26 points. He shot 11 of 18 from the field and made 4 of 6 three-point attempts.
Who led the Golden State Warriors in scoring?
Stephen Curry led all players with 35 points. He made 12 of 22 field-goal attempts and 7 of 14 three-point attempts.
What was the final score between Portland and Golden State?
The Portland Trail Blazers defeated the Golden State Warriors 139-119.
Which team shot better from the field?
Portland shot 53.8 percent from the field, while Golden State shot 43.8 percent.
Who had the most assists in the game?
Jrue Holiday recorded the most assists with 11. He also scored 12 points and collected 5 rebounds.
How many three-pointers did each team make?
Both teams made 16 three-pointers. Portland attempted 34 and Golden State attempted 38.
Conclusion
The portland trail blazers vs golden state warriors match player stats show a game in which Portland’s overall offensive balance proved decisive.
Stephen Curry delivered the game’s highest individual scoring total with 35 points, but Portland produced seven players with at least 12 points. Deni Avdija led the Trail Blazers with 26 points and 6 assists, while Jrue Holiday controlled the offense with 11 assists.
The biggest statistical differences were Portland’s 53.8 percent field-goal shooting, 66 points in the paint, 30 assists and 18 turnovers. Golden State shot well from three-point range and made the same number of threes as Portland, but the Warriors finished with a lower overall field-goal percentage and seven more turnovers.
The second quarter was the key turning point. Portland transformed a 28-28 opening period into a 69-56 halftime lead by scoring 41 points in the second. Golden State responded with 35 points in the third, but Portland remained productive and finished with 36 points in the fourth.
The final 139-119 score therefore reflects more than Curry’s 35 points or Portland’s 16 three-pointers. It reflects the combined effect of efficient shooting, interior scoring, ball movement, multiple scoring options and better possession management.
For readers studying the game through the box score, the central lesson is clear: individual scoring can stand out, but the full team statistical profile explains why Portland controlled the game.
