Dallas Mavericks vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats
The dallas mavericks vs golden state warriors match player stats from the January 22, 2026 meeting at American Airlines Center tell a much more detailed story than the 123-115 final score alone. Dallas overcame a strong third quarter from Golden State by dominating the fourth, while Naji Marshall, Cooper Flagg, Max Christie, and Dwight Powell produced a balanced statistical performance. Stephen Curry led all scorers with 38 points, but Dallas controlled the rebounding battle and finished the game with a 39-26 fourth-quarter advantage. The game information also shows January 23 in UTC-based timing.
Dallas Mavericks vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats
The game produced a fascinating contrast between individual scoring and overall team production.
Curry was clearly Golden State’s biggest offensive threat. He scored 38 points on 14-of-27 shooting and made 8 of his 15 three-point attempts. Jonathan Kuminga added 10 points in limited action, while Brandin Podziemski contributed 9 points and 10 assists.
Dallas received production from several players rather than relying on one dominant scorer. Naji Marshall led the Mavericks with 30 points and 9 assists. Cooper Flagg posted 21 points and 11 rebounds, while Max Christie also scored 21 points. Dwight Powell added 10 points and 12 rebounds.
The statistical distribution is important because Dallas won despite committing 21 turnovers compared with only 10 by Golden State. The Mavericks compensated with superior shooting, rebounding, free-throw production, and a decisive fourth quarter.
Game Summary
| Category | Golden State Warriors | Dallas Mavericks |
| Final Score | 115 | 123 |
| Field Goals | 43-96 | 43-86 |
| Field Goal % | 45% | 50% |
| 3-Pointers | 15-46 | 13-35 |
| 3-Point % | 33% | 37% |
| Free Throws | 14-18 | 24-30 |
| Free Throw % | 78% | 80% |
| Rebounds | 35 | 54 |
| Assists | 29 | 25 |
| Turnovers | 10 | 21 |
| Steals | 15 | 6 |
| Blocks | 7 | 6 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 4 | 11 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 31 | 43 |
| Personal Fouls | 24 | 17 |
The numbers show that both teams made exactly 43 field goals. The difference was efficiency and opportunity. Dallas attempted 86 field goals compared with 96 for Golden State, shot 50% from the field, and generated 54 total rebounds.
How the Game Developed Quarter by Quarter
The quarter-by-quarter numbers reveal why the game remained competitive for three quarters before Dallas separated itself late.
First Quarter: Warriors Start Fast
Golden State opened with a 27-24 advantage.
Curry immediately established himself as the primary offensive weapon. His ability to stretch the defense beyond the arc forced Dallas to respect the perimeter, creating opportunities for other Warriors players.
Dallas stayed close, however. The three-point deficit after the opening period was small enough that the Mavericks never needed to chase the game.
Second Quarter: Dallas Takes Control
The Mavericks responded with a 31-point second quarter while Golden State scored only 23.
That eight-point swing gave Dallas a 55-50 halftime lead.
This period was important because Dallas began creating more possessions through rebounding and interior opportunities. The Mavericks ultimately finished with 11 offensive rebounds, compared with only four for Golden State.
Third Quarter: Curry and Golden State Respond
Golden State exploded for 39 points in the third quarter.
That was the Warriors’ best offensive period of the game and temporarily shifted momentum back toward the visitors. Curry continued attacking, and Golden State entered the fourth quarter ahead 89-84.
For Dallas, this was the point where the game could easily have slipped away.
Fourth Quarter: Dallas Finishes the Job
The Mavericks answered with their best quarter of the night.
Dallas scored 39 points while holding Golden State to 26, turning a five-point deficit into an eight-point victory.
The Mavericks’ late fourth-quarter surge was decisive. Dallas trailed 96-89 early in the fourth quarter before producing a 24-5 run that put them ahead 113-101 with less than five minutes remaining.
That sequence explains the final score better than looking only at the box score.
Dallas did not simply accumulate statistics throughout the evening. The team produced its most effective offensive stretch when the game was at its most important stage.
Stephen Curry’s 38-Point Performance
Stephen Curry was the most prolific individual scorer in the game.
He finished with:
- 38 points
- 14-of-27 field goals
- 8-of-15 three-pointers
- 2-of-2 free throws
- 4 rebounds
- 1 assist
- 2 turnovers
- 34 minutes played
His 8 three-pointers were particularly significant. The game marked a major statistical milestone because Curry became the first player in NBA history to attempt 10,000 three-point shots. He entered the milestone at 10,007 career three-point attempts.
Curry’s shooting also demonstrates why a high-scoring individual performance does not automatically translate into a victory.
He scored 38 of Golden State’s 115 points, accounting for approximately one-third of the team’s total scoring. Yet Dallas generated enough production across its rotation to withstand that output.
The other important point is that Curry did not simply collect empty points. He shot 14-of-27 overall and 8-of-15 from three-point range, making his efficiency a genuine part of Golden State’s offensive success.
The problem for the Warriors was that Dallas created advantages in other areas.
Naji Marshall Leads Dallas
Naji Marshall produced one of the most complete offensive games of the night.
He finished with:
- 30 points
- 10-of-12 field goals
- 2-of-3 three-pointers
- 8-of-8 free throws
- 7 rebounds
- 9 assists
- 4 turnovers
- 34 minutes
- Plus-17
His 30 points came on just 12 field-goal attempts, an unusually efficient scoring night.
Marshall’s 9 assists were equally important because they show that Dallas was not asking him to function solely as a scorer. He was also involved in creating opportunities for teammates.
Marshall was one of the primary catalysts during the decisive fourth-quarter stretch.
This combination of scoring efficiency and playmaking made his statistical contribution particularly valuable.
Cooper Flagg’s Double-Double
Cooper Flagg recorded 21 points and 11 rebounds in 30 minutes.
His complete line was:
- 21 points
- 8-of-18 field goals
- 1-of-5 three-pointers
- 4-of-7 free throws
- 11 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 4 turnovers
- 1 steal
- Plus-22
The 11 rebounds represented a career high at the time.
Flagg’s shooting from outside was not particularly efficient, but his overall contribution went well beyond perimeter scoring.
His 11 rebounds helped Dallas establish a substantial advantage on the glass. He also provided size and activity around the basket, giving the Mavericks another way to create possessions when their outside shooting was inconsistent.
That mattered because Dallas did not dominate every statistical category.
Max Christie Adds 21 Points
Max Christie also scored 21 points.
His line included:
- 21 points
- 7-of-16 field goals
- 5-of-12 three-pointers
- 2-of-2 free throws
- 4 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 2 turnovers
- Plus-28
Christie’s five made three-pointers were especially valuable.
His perimeter shooting helped prevent Golden State from concentrating its defensive attention entirely on Marshall and Flagg.
His plus-28 was also the highest among Dallas players in the box score, although plus-minus should always be interpreted within the context of lineups and game flow rather than treated as an isolated measure of individual performance.
Dwight Powell Controls the Glass
Dwight Powell’s offensive scoring was modest, but his rebounding contribution was substantial.
He finished with:
- 10 points
- 3-of-4 field goals
- 4-of-5 free throws
- 12 rebounds
- 1 assist
- 3 offensive rebounds
- 9 defensive rebounds
- Plus-22
Powell’s 12 rebounds tied him for the highest individual rebounding total recorded in the game according to the box score.
His three offensive rebounds were especially useful because second-chance opportunities can compensate for missed shots.
Dallas ultimately collected 11 offensive rebounds as a team, nearly three times Golden State’s four.
Brandin Podziemski’s Playmaking
Brandin Podziemski did not approach Curry’s scoring total, but he led Golden State with 10 assists.
His line included:
- 9 points
- 4-of-13 field goals
- 10 assists
- 4 rebounds
- 2 steals
- 1 turnover
- Plus-10
The 10 assists demonstrate that Golden State’s offense was not completely dependent on Curry creating every possession.
Podziemski helped distribute the ball, while Curry provided the major scoring pressure.
This is an important distinction when examining the dallas mavericks vs golden state warriors match player stats. A traditional box-score comparison can make scoring appear to be the central story, but assists and possession creation provide another layer.
Jonathan Kuminga’s Limited Appearance
Jonathan Kuminga scored 10 points in only nine minutes.
He was 3-of-3 from the field and 4-of-4 from the free-throw line.
However, he left the game after experiencing left knee soreness during the first half. He landed awkwardly after dribbling the length of the court.
Because his playing time was so limited, his 10 points should not be interpreted in the same way as a 10-point performance from a player who played 25 or 30 minutes.
His efficiency was excellent in the brief appearance, but the sample was too small to tell the full story of his potential impact on the game.
Team Statistics That Explain Dallas’ Victory
The most useful way to understand this game is to move beyond individual scoring.
Several team statistics explain how Dallas overcame Curry’s 38 points.
Rebounding Was the Biggest Difference
Dallas won the rebounding battle 54-35.
That is a 19-rebound advantage.
The Mavericks also led 11-4 in offensive rebounds.
Those extra possessions mattered because Dallas shot 50% from the field while Golden State shot 45%.
A team that shoots efficiently and repeatedly creates second chances can survive other disadvantages.
Dallas Shot More Efficiently
Both teams made 43 field goals.
But Dallas needed only 86 attempts to make those 43 shots.
Golden State needed 96 attempts.
That produced a significant difference in field-goal percentage:
- Dallas: 50%
- Golden State: 45%
The three-point percentages also favored Dallas:
- Dallas: 37%
- Golden State: 33%
Golden State actually made two more three-pointers, 15 compared with Dallas’ 13. But Dallas converted a higher percentage of its attempts.
Free Throws Helped Dallas
Dallas went 24-of-30 from the free-throw line.
Golden State went 14-of-18.
The Mavericks therefore scored 10 more points at the free-throw line.
That is a meaningful difference in a game decided by eight points.
Turnovers Favored Golden State
This was the clearest statistical advantage for the Warriors.
Golden State committed only 10 turnovers.
Dallas committed 21.
That means Dallas gave the ball away 11 more times.
Golden State also recorded 15 steals compared with Dallas’ six.
Normally, that combination would create serious problems for the team committing more turnovers.
Dallas overcame it because its shooting efficiency and rebounding advantage were so substantial.
The Fourth Quarter Was the Deciding Factor
The most revealing portion of the game may be the fourth quarter.
Dallas scored 39 points.
Golden State scored 26.
That 13-point difference was larger than the final eight-point margin.
In other words, the Mavericks did not merely protect a lead. They created the final separation during the closing period.
This is why a quarter-by-quarter examination is more useful than looking only at the final score.
The game changed several times:
- Golden State led after the first quarter.
- Dallas took control by halftime.
- Golden State reclaimed momentum in the third.
- Dallas dominated the fourth and closed the game.
That sequence shows how quickly NBA games can change when shooting, rebounding, and defensive pressure shift simultaneously.
What the Player Stats Reveal About Each Team
The dallas mavericks vs golden state warriors match player stats reveal two different offensive structures.
Golden State leaned heavily on elite perimeter scoring.
Curry supplied 38 points and 8 made threes. Podziemski provided 10 assists. The Warriors also made 15 three-pointers as a team.
Dallas relied more on balance.
Marshall scored 30.
Flagg and Christie each scored 21.
Powell produced a double-double.
This distribution meant Dallas had multiple players capable of influencing the game in different ways.
Dallas Had More Rebounding Sources
Dallas had three players with at least 11 rebounds or close to that level:
- Powell: 12
- Flagg: 11
- Marshall: 7
Golden State’s top individual rebounder was Al Horford with 8.
That difference contributed to the 54-35 team rebounding margin.
Golden State Had More Ball Pressure
The Warriors recorded 15 steals.
Dallas recorded six.
This helped explain why the Mavericks finished with 21 turnovers.
Golden State was effective at forcing mistakes, but the Warriors could not convert that defensive advantage into enough scoring efficiency to win the game.
A Closer Look at Shooting Efficiency
The raw shooting numbers provide one of the clearest explanations of the result.
Dallas:
- 43-of-86 overall
- 13-of-35 from three
- 24-of-30 at the line
Golden State:
- 43-of-96 overall
- 15-of-46 from three
- 14-of-18 at the line
The Warriors made two more three-pointers.
That sounds significant, but they attempted 11 more shots from beyond the arc.
Dallas therefore got more from each possession of its perimeter shooting volume.
The Mavericks also made 24 free throws compared with 14 for Golden State.
Taken together, Dallas was more efficient even though Golden State produced more total field-goal attempts.
Why Turnovers Did Not Decide the Game
A 21-turnover performance normally deserves immediate attention.
Dallas had 11 more turnovers than Golden State and six fewer steals.
Yet the Mavericks still won.
The reason is that basketball games are decided by the combined effect of possessions, shot efficiency, offensive rebounds, free throws, and defensive outcomes.
Dallas lost the turnover battle but won the rebounding battle by 19.
The Mavericks also had a five-percentage-point advantage in field-goal percentage.
That combination substantially reduced the damage caused by their turnovers.
This is one of the strongest lessons from the game for anyone studying box scores: one negative category does not automatically determine the result.
Previous and Subsequent Meetings
This January meeting was part of a broader Warriors-Mavericks series.
Dallas had previously defeated Golden State 126-116 on December 26, 2025.
After the January game, the series was tied 1-1 according to the supplied game data.
The teams later met again on March 24, 2026, when Golden State defeated Dallas 137-131 in overtime.
That later result provides useful context for anyone comparing the season series, but it should not be mixed into the January box-score analysis.
Each game had its own circumstances, lineups, shooting performance, and possession profile.
Why Box Scores Need Context
One of the easiest mistakes when researching NBA player statistics is treating every number as equally meaningful.
A 38-point game is important.
But so are:
- Shooting efficiency
- Rebounding
- Turnovers
- Assists
- Free-throw attempts
- Minutes played
- Plus-minus
- Game situation
Curry’s 38 points were outstanding from a scoring perspective.
Marshall’s 30 points came with nine assists and 7 rebounds.
Flagg’s 21 points came with 11 rebounds.
Powell’s 12 rebounds helped Dallas create extra possessions.
Podziemski’s 10 assists showed his role as a facilitator.
Each statistic describes a different part of the game.
That is why a serious analysis should not reduce player performance to a single ranking.
How to Read This Box Score Like an Analyst
If you are using this game as a model for researching NBA player statistics, start with the following sequence.
1. Check the Final Score
Dallas won 123-115.
This establishes the outcome but tells you almost nothing about how the game unfolded.
2. Check the Quarter Scores
The quarter breakdown immediately reveals that Dallas finished strongly.
3. Compare Shooting Percentages
Dallas shot 50%.
Golden State shot 45%.
That provides an important explanation for the result.
4. Check Rebounding
Dallas won 54-35.
This is one of the largest statistical differences in the game.
5. Check Turnovers
Golden State won this category comfortably, 10-21.
That prevents the analysis from becoming one-sided.
6. Identify Individual Contributors
Look beyond the top scorer.
Marshall, Flagg, Christie, Powell, Curry, and Podziemski each affected the game differently.
7. Put Everything Into Game Context
Finally, ask when those contributions happened.
Dallas’ biggest statistical advantage became most important during the fourth quarter.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the Mavericks vs Warriors game?
Stephen Curry led all players with 38 points for Golden State. Naji Marshall led Dallas with 30 points.
How many points did Naji Marshall score?
Naji Marshall scored 30 points. He also recorded 7 rebounds and 9 assists while shooting 10-of-12 from the field.
How many rebounds did Cooper Flagg have?
Cooper Flagg recorded 11 rebounds along with 21 points and 2 assists. His 11 rebounds were a career high at the time.
What was Stephen Curry’s three-point shooting?
Curry made 8 of 15 three-point attempts, finishing 8-of-15 from beyond the arc. He scored 38 total points.
Which team had more rebounds?
Dallas had 54 rebounds compared with 35 for Golden State, giving the Mavericks a 19-rebound advantage.
What was the final score?
The Dallas Mavericks defeated the Golden State Warriors 123-115. Dallas scored 39 points in the fourth quarter while Golden State scored 26.
Conclusion
The dallas mavericks vs golden state warriors match player stats from this matchup show why the final score cannot be explained by scoring alone.
Stephen Curry delivered the game’s highest individual scoring total with 38 points and made eight three-pointers. Naji Marshall responded with 30 points and nine assists, while Cooper Flagg and Max Christie each scored 21. Dwight Powell added 12 rebounds, and Brandin Podziemski provided 10 assists for Golden State.
At the team level, Dallas’ 54-35 rebounding advantage, 50% field-goal shooting, and 24 made free throws were central statistical factors. Golden State countered with 15 steals, only 10 turnovers, and 15 made three-pointers, but those advantages were not enough to offset Dallas’ efficiency and dominance on the glass.
The biggest swing came in the fourth quarter. After Golden State produced 39 points in the third, Dallas answered with 39 of its own in the final period while limiting the Warriors to 26. That closing stretch transformed a competitive game into a 123-115 Mavericks victory.
For readers studying NBA box scores, this matchup is a useful example of why player statistics should be considered together rather than in isolation. The leading scorer, best rebounder, primary playmaker, shooting efficiency, turnovers, and fourth-quarter production all tell different parts of the same story.
