The toronto raptors vs 76ers match player stats from the November 2025 meeting tell a much more detailed story than the final score alone. Philadelphia defeated Toronto 130-120 at Xfinity Mobile Arena, overcoming a 10-point first-quarter deficit and controlling the game through stronger rebounding, interior scoring, and a balanced offensive attack. Tyrese Maxey led Philadelphia with 31 points, Joel Embiid added 29, and Trendon Watford produced a remarkable triple-double with 20 points, 17 rebounds, and 10 assists. For Toronto, RJ Barrett and Immanuel Quickley each scored 22 points, while Brandon Ingram added 21.

The result was Philadelphia’s ninth game of the 2025-26 season and moved the 76ers to 6-3. Toronto dropped to 5-5 after the loss. Although the Raptors opened the game with an explosive 43-point first quarter, Philadelphia responded with a 35-point second quarter and never surrendered the momentum it created.

This article breaks down the complete player production, team statistics, key turning points, shooting efficiency, rebounding battle, playmaking, and the individual performances that shaped the result.

Game Overview

The matchup took place at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia. The official attendance was 19,746.

Philadelphia entered the contest at 5-3 overall and 3-1 at home, while Toronto was 5-4 overall and 3-2 on the road before the game. The final result pushed Philadelphia to 6-3 and Toronto to 5-5.

Category	Toronto Raptors	Philadelphia 76ers
Final Score	120	130
First Quarter	43	33
Second Quarter	20	35
Third Quarter	34	33
Fourth Quarter	23	29
Field Goals	41-90	49-96
Field Goal %	46%	51%
Three-Pointers	16-38	10-35
Three-Point %	42%	29%
Free Throws	22-28	22-28
Free Throw %	79%	79%
Rebounds	38	54
Assists	29	31
Turnovers	10	13
Steals	7	4
Blocks	5	9

The most important statistical difference was not three-point shooting. Toronto actually shot considerably better from three-point range.

The larger difference came inside the arc and on the glass.

Philadelphia made 49 of 96 field-goal attempts for 51 percent, while Toronto made 41 of 90 for 46 percent. The 76ers also collected 54 rebounds compared with 38 for the Raptors. That 16-rebound advantage gave Philadelphia more control over possessions and helped compensate for its lower three-point percentage.

Toronto Raptors vs 76ers Match Player Stats: Complete Player Breakdown

The individual numbers explain why the game remained competitive even though Philadelphia ultimately won by 10 points.

Toronto Raptors Player Stats

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	+/-
Brandon Ingram	37	21	7-17	0-3	7-7	8	5	0	0	1	-11
RJ Barrett	34	22	7-12	2-4	6-7	3	6	0	0	1	-14
Scottie Barnes	32	18	7-14	2-5	2-3	5	4	2	2	2	+4
Immanuel Quickley	36	22	8-16	5-9	1-2	6	6	0	0	1	-8
Ochai Agbaji	15	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0	-3
Sandro Mamukelashvili	17	10	3-5	1-3	3-3	3	2	2	1	1	-3
Collin Murray-Boyles	22	12	4-6	1-1	3-6	7	1	1	2	1	+2
Jamal Shead	24	9	3-7	3-5	0-0	3	5	1	0	2	-9
Ja’Kobe Walter	11	3	1-6	1-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	-16
Gradey Dick	12	3	1-6	1-4	0-0	1	0	1	0	1	+5

Toronto’s starting five combined for 83 points, with Barrett and Quickley providing 22 apiece.

The Raptors also received useful production from the bench. Collin Murray-Boyles scored 12 points in 22 minutes and added seven rebounds, one assist, one steal, and two blocks. Sandro Mamukelashvili contributed 10 points, three rebounds, two assists, two steals, and one block.

One of the more interesting individual numbers came from Scottie Barnes. He scored 18 points while shooting 7-of-14 from the field, and he finished with a positive plus-minus of four despite Toronto losing the game by 10. Barnes also recorded five rebounds, four assists, two steals, and two blocks.

That combination is important because it shows how a player’s contribution can differ from the team’s overall result. Barnes was one of Toronto’s most productive all-around players even though Philadelphia won the matchup.

The official box score also shows that Brandon Ingram scored 21 points and supplied eight rebounds and five assists. He shot 7-of-17 from the field and converted all seven of his free-throw attempts.

Philadelphia 76ers Player Stats

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	+/-
Trendon Watford	37	20	8-10	1-2	3-5	17	10	0	1	1	+12
Joel Embiid	26	29	10-16	1-4	8-9	6	4	0	1	2	+15
Kelly Oubre Jr.	37	19	8-15	1-6	2-3	4	1	0	2	2	+5
Tyrese Maxey	43	31	12-24	3-10	4-5	4	7	1	2	1	+21
VJ Edgecombe	36	11	5-15	0-4	1-2	7	4	3	0	2	+7
Jabari Walker	5	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	0	+6
Justin Edwards	7	3	1-2	1-2	0-0	2	1	0	1	1	-13
Andre Drummond	16	4	1-5	0-0	2-2	8	1	0	1	1	+8
Adem Bona	6	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	1	0	-13
Quentin Grimes	28	13	4-8	3-6	2-2	2	2	0	0	3	+2

Philadelphia’s statistical profile was led by three players who attacked the game in very different ways.

Maxey supplied volume scoring and perimeter creation. Embiid delivered efficient interior scoring. Watford controlled the glass while functioning as a facilitator.

That combination made Philadelphia difficult to defend.

Tyrese Maxey Leads Philadelphia With 31 Points

Tyrese Maxey was Philadelphia’s leading scorer with 31 points.

He played 43 minutes and shot 12-of-24 from the field. He also made three of 10 three-point attempts and four of five free throws. His seven assists were nearly as important as his scoring total because they helped Philadelphia maintain offensive pressure throughout the game.

Maxey finished with a plus-minus of +21, the highest mark among the 76ers.

His workload was significant. Playing 43 minutes meant he was on the floor for almost the entire contest, particularly during the stretches when Toronto threatened to regain control.

The NBA’s official highlight report noted that Maxey’s performance extended his streak of opening the season with at least 25 points in nine consecutive games, a significant scoring run at that stage of the season.

For this particular matchup, however, his value was not limited to the scoring streak. Philadelphia needed someone capable of creating shots when Toronto’s defense tightened, and Maxey’s ability to generate offense gave the 76ers a reliable outlet.

Joel Embiid Adds 29 Points

Joel Embiid finished with 29 points, six rebounds, four assists, and one block.

His shooting efficiency stood out. Embiid converted 10 of 16 field-goal attempts and eight of nine free throws. He also hit one three-pointer.

That efficiency helped Philadelphia punish Toronto around the basket and at the free-throw line.

Embiid played 26 minutes, which was significantly fewer than Maxey’s 43 minutes, yet he still produced the second-highest scoring total in the game.

His plus-minus of +15 also reflected Philadelphia’s success during his minutes.

The matchup became particularly important because Toronto had stretches in which Scottie Barnes defended Embiid effectively. Even so, Philadelphia continued finding ways to generate interior production through Embiid and Watford.

Trendon Watford Records a Triple-Double

The most unusual statistical performance of the game came from Trendon Watford.

Watford finished with:

• 20 points
• 17 rebounds
• 10 assists
• 8-of-10 shooting
• 1-of-2 from three-point range
• 3-of-5 from the free-throw line
• 1 block
• 1 turnover

The 17 rebounds were the highest total by any player in the matchup.

His 10 assists were also the game-high.

Most importantly, the performance gave Watford the first triple-double of his NBA career. The NBA’s official game highlights confirmed that achievement and noted the rarity of his statistical combination.

Watford’s performance is especially revealing because it demonstrates why raw scoring totals do not always identify the most influential statistical contribution.

He scored fewer points than Maxey or Embiid, but he controlled the rebounding battle and created opportunities for teammates. His 20-point, 17-rebound, 10-assist line directly addressed three major areas of the game.

His 8-of-10 shooting also meant Toronto could not simply treat him as a facilitator and leave him open around the offensive end.

RJ Barrett and Immanuel Quickley Carry Toronto’s Scoring

Toronto’s two 22-point scorers were RJ Barrett and Immanuel Quickley.

Barrett shot 7-of-12 from the field, 2-of-4 from three, and 6-of-7 from the free-throw line. He added three rebounds and six assists.

Quickley also scored 22 points, shooting 8-of-16 overall and an excellent 5-of-9 from three-point range. He added six rebounds and six assists.

Quickley’s perimeter shooting was particularly important because Toronto finished 16-of-38 from three-point range, good for 42 percent.

In other words, Toronto did not lose this game because it could not shoot from outside.

The Raptors actually had the superior three-point percentage.

The problem was that Philadelphia generated more overall offense through a combination of efficient two-point scoring, rebounding, and interior pressure.

Barrett nearly became the player who changed the outcome late. According to the game recap, his three-pointer with 3:25 remaining cut Philadelphia’s lead to 119-116. Philadelphia then answered with a six-point run that effectively decided the game.

Scottie Barnes Provides Toronto’s All-Around Impact

Scottie Barnes scored 18 points and produced one of the most balanced statistical lines for Toronto.

His final numbers included:

• 18 points
• 5 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 2 steals
• 2 blocks
• 7-of-14 shooting
• 2-of-5 from three
• +4 plus-minus

The positive plus-minus is noteworthy because Toronto’s other four starters all finished with negative plus-minus figures.

This does not mean plus-minus should be treated as a complete evaluation of an individual player. It is a lineup-based statistic that reflects the team’s scoring margin while a player is on the floor. Still, in this game, Barnes’ +4 provides useful context alongside his two-way contributions.

He was one of the players who helped Toronto recover after Philadelphia’s second-quarter surge.

The Second Quarter Changed the Game

The clearest turning point was the second quarter.

Toronto scored 43 points in the opening period and led Philadelphia by 10 after 12 minutes.

Then the game changed.

Philadelphia outscored Toronto 35-20 in the second quarter.

That produced a 68-63 halftime advantage for the 76ers.

The Raptors had gone from scoring 43 points in one quarter to scoring only 20 in the next.

This is one of the most important pieces of context when examining the numbers. Looking only at the final score can make the game appear relatively even. Looking at the quarter distribution reveals that Philadelphia’s response in the second quarter was the foundation of the victory.

The 76ers then maintained their advantage by winning the third quarter 33-34? No. Toronto actually outscored Philadelphia 34-33 in the third quarter. That distinction matters.

Toronto did respond after halftime.

The problem was that the Raptors were still chasing a lead created by Philadelphia’s second-quarter surge.

Philadelphia then won the fourth quarter 29-23, closing the game without allowing Toronto to complete the comeback.

Toronto Won the Three-Point Battle, But Philadelphia Won the Possession Battle

One of the most interesting aspects of the box score is that the losing team shot better from three.

Toronto:

16-of-38, 42 percent

Philadelphia:

10-of-35, 29 percent

That is a significant difference.

Yet Philadelphia still scored 130 points.

Why?

The answer starts with field-goal volume and rebounding.

Philadelphia attempted 96 field goals compared with Toronto’s 90. The 76ers also made 49 shots compared with Toronto’s 41.

More importantly, Philadelphia grabbed 54 rebounds.

Toronto grabbed 38.

That 16-rebound gap is enormous.

Philadelphia also recorded nine blocks compared with Toronto’s five, adding another indication of the 76ers’ defensive presence around the rim.

The numbers therefore show an important basketball lesson: three-point percentage alone does not determine offensive success.

A team can shoot better from three and still lose if the opponent creates more scoring opportunities and converts more shots overall.

Free-Throw Shooting Was Almost Identical

Both teams went 22-of-28 from the free-throw line.

That produced a 79 percent free-throw percentage for both sides.

Because the free-throw numbers were effectively identical, the foul line did not create a major statistical separation between the teams.

That makes the differences in field-goal efficiency and rebounding even more important.

Philadelphia’s 51 percent overall shooting compared with Toronto’s 46 percent represented a five-percentage-point advantage.

Combined with the 16-rebound difference, that gave the 76ers a stronger overall statistical foundation.

Turnovers Did Not Decide the Game

Toronto actually protected the ball better.

The Raptors committed 10 turnovers.

Philadelphia committed 13.

At first glance, this might suggest Toronto should have had a possession advantage.

But the broader box score shows that Philadelphia compensated through rebounding and shooting efficiency.

This is a useful reminder that turnovers should not be viewed in isolation.

Toronto’s three-turnover advantage was not enough to offset Philadelphia’s 16-rebound advantage and eight additional made field goals.

Philadelphia also produced nine blocks, while Toronto recorded five.

The 76ers therefore won several of the physical categories that helped shape the possession and scoring environment.

What the Team Numbers Say About the Matchup

The team statistics reveal four major themes.

1. Philadelphia controlled the glass

The 54-38 rebounding advantage was the clearest statistical separation.

Watford alone collected 17 rebounds.

Toronto’s leading rebounder was Sandro Mamukelashvili with three rebounds according to the individual box score, while Brandon Ingram led the Raptors’ starters with eight. Collin Murray-Boyles added seven.

The supplied game summary identified Mamukelashvili as Toronto’s leading rebounder, but the official box score shows Ingram with eight and Murray-Boyles with seven. The official player-by-player figures are therefore the safer reference when discussing individual rebounding leaders.

2. Toronto’s three-point shooting was strong

The Raptors shot 42 percent from three.

Quickley was particularly effective, going 5-of-9 from beyond the arc.

Toronto also received three made threes from Jamal Shead.

Despite that success, Philadelphia’s ability to score efficiently inside prevented the Raptors’ perimeter advantage from becoming decisive.

3. Philadelphia’s stars converted efficiently

Embiid shot 10-of-16.

Watford shot 8-of-10.

Maxey made 12 of 24.

Kelly Oubre Jr. made eight of 15.

That gave Philadelphia four major contributors who combined for efficient scoring.

4. Philadelphia had more interior defensive resistance

The 76ers recorded nine blocks.

Toronto had five.

The difference helped Philadelphia protect the rim and limited some of the value Toronto could have gained from its strong outside shooting.

The Late-Game Sequence Matters

The final few minutes provide useful context that a box score cannot fully capture.

Toronto was within three points at 119-116 after Barrett hit a three-pointer with 3:25 remaining.

At that point, the game was still very much in reach.

Philadelphia responded immediately.

VJ Edgecombe scored on a layup.

Kelly Oubre Jr. followed with a dunk.

Embiid then scored after recovering his own miss.

That six-point Philadelphia run turned a three-point game into a nine-point advantage with approximately 1:25 remaining.

This sequence illustrates why Philadelphia’s overall numbers matter.

The 76ers were able to create scoring opportunities inside when the game became tight. Toronto’s three-point shooting had helped keep the game close, but Philadelphia’s ability to score near the basket provided a different type of late-game pressure.

Toronto Raptors vs 76ers Match Player Stats: What Stands Out Most

The most useful way to read the numbers is to separate scoring from overall impact.

Maxey was Philadelphia’s leading scorer.

Embiid was Philadelphia’s second-leading scorer and one of its most efficient offensive players.

Watford delivered the game’s most unusual all-around performance.

For Toronto, Barrett and Quickley provided the scoring volume, while Barnes contributed across multiple categories.

Ingram added a strong combination of scoring, rebounding, and passing.

Murray-Boyles gave Toronto important bench production with 12 points and seven rebounds.

The game therefore was not simply a case of Philadelphia’s stars outperforming Toronto’s stars.

It was more accurately a case of Philadelphia receiving production across several statistical areas at the same time.

Why Toronto’s 120 Points Were Not Enough

Scoring 120 points normally puts a team in a strong position.

Toronto’s offense was productive.

The Raptors scored 43 points in the opening quarter, made 16 three-pointers, committed only 10 turnovers, and had five players score at least 18 points.

Yet Philadelphia scored 130.

That difference came from efficiency and possession control.

Philadelphia made eight more field goals than Toronto.

The 76ers also grabbed 16 more rebounds.

Their 31 assists were slightly ahead of Toronto’s 29.

Their nine blocks were four more than Toronto’s five.

So although Toronto’s offense performed well, Philadelphia produced the more complete statistical profile.

Historical Context From the Game

The result also carried an unusual storyline because Philadelphia had been swept by Toronto in all four meetings during the previous season.

The 2025 matchup therefore represented Philadelphia’s first victory over the Raptors in that season series.

After this game, Philadelphia led the 2025-26 season series 1-0.

The game was also part of Philadelphia’s celebration of the franchise’s 2000-01 Eastern Conference championship season, adding historical significance to the occasion at Xfinity Mobile Arena.

Official Game Information

For readers who want to verify the core figures, the NBA’s official game record provides the game summary, box score, game charts, and play-by-play information. Official NBA game record and box score

The official records list the following game details:

• Venue: Xfinity Mobile Arena, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
• Attendance: 19,746
• Final score: Philadelphia 130, Toronto 120
• Officials: Derrick Collins, John Goble, and Eric Dalen
• Game ID: 401810039
• Toronto record after the game: 5-5
• Philadelphia record after the game: 6-3
• Season series: Philadelphia leads 1-0

One date detail is worth clarifying. Some databases identify the contest as November 9, 2025, while the NBA’s Philadelphia game page labels it November 8, 2025. This difference comes from how the game is timestamped and displayed across platforms. The underlying contest and Game ID are the same.

A Practical Way to Read NBA Player Stats

When examining a game like this, it is easy to focus only on the leading scorer.

A better approach is to look at several categories together:

1. Scoring: Who created the most points?
2. Efficiency: How many shots did the player need to produce those points?
3. Rebounding: Which team controlled missed shots?
4. Playmaking: Who created scoring opportunities for teammates?
5. Turnovers: Which team protected possessions?
6. Defense: Which players produced steals and blocks?
7. Plus-minus: What was the team’s scoring margin during a player’s minutes?
8. Game situation: Did the production come when the game was close or when the outcome was already decided?

Using this method gives a much more useful interpretation than simply saying one player scored more than another.

For example, Maxey’s 31 points stand out immediately. But Watford’s 20 points, 17 rebounds, and 10 assists reveal why Philadelphia’s offense remained organized while also controlling the glass.

Likewise, Quickley’s 22 points and five made threes show Toronto’s perimeter strength, while Barnes’ 18 points, five rebounds, four assists, two steals, and two blocks show his broader contribution.

What Fans Should Take From the Box Score

The biggest lesson from this matchup is that Toronto did many things well offensively.

The Raptors scored 120 points.

• They shot 42 percent from three.
• They committed only 10 turnovers.
• They had multiple players contribute at a high level.

But Philadelphia’s response was more complete.

The 76ers shot 51 percent overall, dominated the rebounding battle, produced nine blocks, and received a triple-double from Watford alongside major scoring performances from Maxey and Embiid.

That combination allowed Philadelphia to recover from a 10-point first-quarter deficit.

The quarter-by-quarter breakdown is especially important because it demonstrates how quickly an NBA game can change. Toronto’s 43-point opening period looked dominant, but Philadelphia responded with a 35-point second quarter while limiting Toronto to 20.

From there, Philadelphia maintained enough separation to survive Toronto’s late push.

Final Statistical Takeaway

The toronto raptors vs 76ers match player stats show a game in which the losing team actually had several impressive statistical advantages.

• Toronto shot better from three.
• Toronto committed fewer turnovers.
• Toronto scored 120 points.

The Raptors also received 22 points each from Barrett and Quickley, 21 from Ingram, 18 from Barnes, and useful bench contributions from Murray-Boyles and Mamukelashvili.

Philadelphia nevertheless had the stronger overall statistical combination.

Maxey scored 31.

Embiid scored 29.

Watford recorded 20 points, 17 rebounds, and 10 assists.

Philadelphia shot 51 percent from the field.

The 76ers collected 54 rebounds.

They recorded nine blocks.

Those numbers explain how Philadelphia could win despite making six fewer three-pointers and shooting significantly worse from beyond the arc.

The game was therefore less about one isolated statistic and more about how different statistical advantages interacted over 48 minutes.

FAQs

Who scored the most points in the Raptors vs 76ers game?

Tyrese Maxey led all scorers with 31 points for Philadelphia. Joel Embiid scored 29, while RJ Barrett and Immanuel Quickley each scored 22 for Toronto.

Who recorded a triple-double in the game?

Trendon Watford recorded the first triple-double of his NBA career with 20 points, 17 rebounds, and 10 assists.

What was the final score between Toronto and Philadelphia?

The Philadelphia 76ers defeated the Toronto Raptors 130-120.

Which team had more rebounds?

Philadelphia had 54 rebounds compared with 38 for Toronto, giving the 76ers a 16-rebound advantage.

Which team shot better from three-point range?

Toronto shot better from three-point range. The Raptors made 16 of 38 attempts for 42 percent, while Philadelphia made 10 of 35 for 29 percent.

Who led the game in assists?

Trendon Watford led all players with 10 assists. Tyrese Maxey had seven, while RJ Barrett and Immanuel Quickley each recorded six for Toronto.

Conclusion

The toronto raptors vs 76ers match player stats provide a detailed picture of a game that changed dramatically after Toronto’s 43-point opening quarter.

Philadelphia responded with a 35-point second quarter and built the foundation for its 130-120 victory.

Maxey’s 31 points and Embiid’s 29 supplied the headline scoring numbers, but Watford’s 20-point triple-double was arguably the most unusual statistical performance of the night. His 17 rebounds and 10 assists helped Philadelphia control both possessions and playmaking.

Toronto’s strongest individual scoring performances came from Barrett and Quickley, who each scored 22. Ingram added 21, while Barnes contributed across the box score with 18 points, five rebounds, four assists, two steals, and two blocks.

The team statistics explain the final result particularly well. Toronto won the three-point percentage battle and protected the ball better, but Philadelphia made more field goals, shot better overall, dominated the boards, and recorded more blocks.

The 54-38 rebounding advantage was especially significant.

Ultimately, the numbers show why a complete box-score analysis requires more than identifying the highest scorer. Shooting efficiency, rebounding, playmaking, turnovers, defensive events, and performance during decisive stretches all contribute to the story of an NBA game.

For this matchup, Philadelphia’s ability to combine efficient scoring with dominant rebounding and balanced playmaking proved decisive, while Toronto’s strong perimeter shooting kept the game competitive deep into the fourth quarter.