Washington Wizards vs Houston Rockets Match Player Stats

The Washington Wizards vs Houston Rockets match player stats from the March 3, 2026 matchup show a game that was much closer at the final buzzer than Houston’s third-quarter control suggested. The Rockets defeated the Wizards 123-118 at Capital One Arena in Washington, DC, using a balanced scoring attack led by Alperen Sengun, Kevin Durant, Amen Thompson, and Reed Sheppard. Washington answered with strong perimeter shooting and a 38-point fourth quarter, but its late comeback fell short.

Houston entered the game with a 38-22 record and an 18-15 mark on the road, while Washington stood at 16-44 and 11-21 at home. The result moved Houston to 2-0 against Washington in the season series. The official NBA game information records 17,352 spectators at Capital One Arena, with Houston shooting 48.9% from the field and Washington finishing at 48.4%.

For readers searching for the Washington Wizards vs Houston Rockets match player stats, the most important point is that this was not simply a story about one star having a big scoring night. Houston won because several players contributed in different ways. Sengun controlled the interior, Durant provided efficient scoring, Thompson supplied athletic production across multiple categories, and Sheppard created offense while producing six steals.

Washington’s best offensive moments came from Bilal Coulibaly, Sharife Cooper, Kyshawn George, Justin Champagnie, and Bub Carrington. The Wizards also made 19 of 35 three-point attempts, an outstanding 54.3% from beyond the arc. That shooting kept them alive despite Houston’s advantage on the glass and its strong interior scoring.

Table of Contents

Game Summary and Final Score

The final score was:

Houston Rockets 123, Washington Wizards 118

The quarter-by-quarter scoring explains how the game developed:

Quarter	Houston Rockets	Washington Wizards
1st	26	30
2nd	34	21
3rd	34	29
4th	29	38
Final	123	118

Washington started better, winning the opening quarter 30-26. Houston then changed the rhythm of the game in the second quarter, scoring 34 points while holding Washington to 21.

That 13-point second-quarter swing was important. Houston then added another 34 points in the third quarter and created enough separation to withstand Washington’s late push.

The Wizards responded with their best offensive quarter of the night in the fourth. They scored 38 points, compared with Houston’s 29, but the deficit created earlier was too large to erase.

The NBA’s official game page confirms the 123-118 final, the quarter scores, the attendance, and Houston’s 38-22 record entering the game.

Houston Rockets Player Stats

Houston’s offensive production was distributed among its leading players. Alperen Sengun scored 32 points, Kevin Durant added 30, Amen Thompson scored 22, and Reed Sheppard contributed 19.

Together, those four players accounted for 103 of Houston’s 123 points.

That is particularly important because it shows how difficult the Rockets were to defend. Washington could not focus exclusively on one scorer. Sengun could attack inside, Durant could score from multiple levels, Thompson could finish efficiently, and Sheppard could create opportunities as a passer.

Alperen Sengun

Alperen Sengun was Houston’s leading scorer with 32 points.

His complete line was:

32 points
12-of-20 field goals
0-of-1 from three-point range
8-of-11 free throws
13 rebounds
2 assists
1 steal
1 block
8 turnovers
2 fouls
-4 plus/minus

Sengun shot 60% from the field, making him one of the most efficient high-volume scorers in the game.

His 13 rebounds were also important. Washington finished with only 27 total rebounds, while Houston collected 59. That 32-rebound difference is one of the clearest statistical reasons Houston was able to control the overall game.

Sengun’s eight turnovers are worth noting, however. His offensive responsibility was significant, and he handled 20 field-goal attempts while also working as a playmaking hub. The turnovers show that his production came with a considerable workload.

The official NBA box score lists Sengun at 38:04 of playing time, 32 points, 13 rebounds, and 2 assists.

Kevin Durant

Kevin Durant finished with 30 points on highly efficient shooting.

His numbers were:

30 points
8-of-15 field goals
3-of-6 three-pointers
11-of-11 free throws
7 rebounds
1 assist
1 block
6 turnovers
1 foul
-1 plus/minus

Durant’s 53.3% field-goal percentage and perfect 11-of-11 free-throw shooting made his scoring especially valuable.

The free-throw line was a major part of his offensive efficiency. He scored 11 points from free throws alone and did not miss an attempt.

His three-point shooting was also effective. He made half of his six attempts from outside.

The six turnovers stand out because they were unusually high relative to his one assist. Still, the overall offensive result was strong because Washington had difficulty preventing him from getting efficient looks and reaching the foul line.

The NBA’s game recap also identifies Durant’s 30-point performance and notes that he made all 11 of his free throws.

Amen Thompson

Amen Thompson delivered one of Houston’s most efficient performances.

He recorded:

22 points
10-of-15 field goals
1-of-1 from three
1-of-1 free throws
12 rebounds
4 assists
2 steals
+6 plus/minus

Thompson shot 66.7% from the field.

His 12 rebounds were especially valuable because he was not simply scoring from the perimeter. His activity helped Houston dominate the rebounding battle.

He also contributed four assists and two steals, giving him a strong all-around statistical profile.

Ten made field goals on only 15 attempts is a clear sign that Houston was finding efficient ways to use his athleticism and finishing ability.

Reed Sheppard

Reed Sheppard produced perhaps the most complete statistical line among Houston’s guards.

He finished with:

19 points
7-of-18 field goals
4-of-11 three-pointers
1-of-2 free throws
7 rebounds
10 assists
6 steals
2 blocks
3 turnovers
2 fouls
+10 plus/minus

Sheppard’s 10 assists and six steals are particularly significant.

He became the only Houston player in this game with double-digit assists, while also leading the Rockets in steals. The NBA recap noted that this was his first career double-double.

His shooting was less efficient than that of Sengun or Thompson, but his overall impact went far beyond scoring.

A player who contributes 19 points, 10 assists, seven rebounds, six steals, and two blocks affects the game in several different phases. That is why looking only at points would miss a major part of Sheppard’s performance.

Tari Eason

Tari Eason scored 9 points on 4-of-11 shooting.

He added:

6 rebounds
2 assists
1 block
1-of-1 free throws
+13 plus/minus

His +13 was the best plus/minus figure among Houston’s listed players.

Although Eason did not produce a large scoring total, his rebounding and defensive activity helped support Houston’s larger frontcourt advantage.

Dorian Finney-Smith

Dorian Finney-Smith finished with:

5 points
2-of-6 field goals
1-of-1 three-pointers
6 rebounds
1 assist
1 steal
+1 plus/minus

His statistical contribution was modest offensively, but he provided six rebounds and made his only three-point attempt.

Clint Capela

Clint Capela recorded:

4 points
1-of-3 field goals
2-of-2 free throws
8 rebounds
1 assist
+6 plus/minus

His eight rebounds were useful in a game where Houston’s control of the glass became one of the defining statistical differences.

Houston’s Remaining Rotation

Aaron Holiday scored 2 points on 1-of-3 shooting and did not record a rebound or assist.

Josh Okogie did not score, finishing 0-of-1 from the field and 0-of-1 from three-point range.

Houston’s official box score also lists Isaiah Crawford and Jeff Green as DNP decisions, while Jae’Sean Tate was listed as unavailable because of injury or illness.

Washington Wizards Player Stats

Washington received strong scoring from several players, but its production was less efficient overall when measured against Houston’s interior advantage.

Bilal Coulibaly led the Wizards with 23 points. Sharife Cooper added 21, while Kyshawn George scored 16 and Justin Champagnie produced 12.

Washington also received useful contributions from Bub Carrington, Jaden Hardy, Jamir Watkins, and others.

Bilal Coulibaly

Bilal Coulibaly led Washington with 23 points.

His line included:

23 points
9-of-16 field goals
5-of-7 three-pointers
1 rebound
1 steal
2 blocks
+4 plus/minus

Coulibaly was Washington’s most efficient high-volume scorer.

His 5-of-7 shooting from three-point range was particularly impressive. He converted 71.4% of his three-point attempts and supplied an important source of perimeter offense.

The issue was that his rebounding contribution was limited to one board. Washington’s overall rebounding deficit meant that the Wizards needed their perimeter shooting to remain extremely efficient throughout the game.

The official NBA game page lists Coulibaly as Washington’s leading scorer with 23 points.

Sharife Cooper

Sharife Cooper provided a major scoring spark from the bench.

He recorded:

21 points
8-of-10 field goals
3-of-4 three-pointers
2-of-2 free throws
2 rebounds
3 assists
+7 plus/minus

Cooper’s efficiency was excellent.

He made 80% of his field-goal attempts and 75% of his three-point attempts. His 21 points on only 10 field-goal attempts made him one of Washington’s most productive offensive players on a possession-for-possession basis.

His +7 plus/minus also suggests that his minutes coincided with productive stretches for Washington.

Kyshawn George

Kyshawn George finished with:

16 points
5-of-13 field goals
3-of-6 three-pointers
3-of-4 free throws
1 rebound
2 assists
1 steal
-5 plus/minus

George provided reliable perimeter scoring, particularly from three-point range.

His three made threes were part of Washington’s overall 19-for-35 performance from beyond the arc.

Bub Carrington

Bub Carrington posted:

11 points
4-of-10 field goals
2-of-3 three-pointers
1-of-1 free throws
5 rebounds
4 assists
2 steals
+1 plus/minus

His four assists and five rebounds gave Washington useful secondary production.

He also helped the Wizards generate defensive pressure with two steals.

Justin Champagnie

Justin Champagnie scored 12 points on 5-of-7 shooting.

He also recorded:

2-of-3 three-pointers
2 rebounds
2 assists
3 steals
1 block

His three steals and one block show that his value was not limited to shooting.

Champagnie was one of Washington’s most active two-way contributors in the box score.

Jaden Hardy

Jaden Hardy finished with:

14 points
6-of-9 field goals
1-of-2 three-pointers
1-of-3 free throws
4 rebounds
1 assist
-9 plus/minus

His 66.7% field-goal shooting was efficient, although the negative plus/minus indicates that his minutes coincided with a difficult stretch for Washington.

Tre Johnson

Tre Johnson scored 5 points on 2-of-10 shooting.

He added:

4 rebounds
3 assists
1 steal
1 block
1-of-3 three-point shooting

The shooting efficiency was a clear challenge. Washington needed more consistent production from several perimeter players because the Rockets were generating so much offense inside.

Jamir Watkins

Jamir Watkins recorded:

7 points
3-of-4 field goals
1-of-2 three-pointers
3 rebounds
4 assists
1 steal

His four assists were a useful contribution, especially during Washington’s fourth-quarter push.

Will Riley

Will Riley scored 7 points.

His line included:

1-of-9 field goals
1-of-5 three-pointers
4-of-4 free throws
1 rebound
1 assist
3 steals
-13 plus/minus

The three steals helped defensively, but the shooting efficiency was difficult for Washington to overcome.

Julian Reese

Julian Reese finished with 2 points on 1-of-3 shooting.

He collected four rebounds and three steals, but also committed three turnovers and six fouls.

The official NBA recap notes that Reese fouled out with two points in his NBA debut.

Washington Wizards vs Houston Rockets Match Player Stats: Team Comparison

The team numbers reveal the biggest reasons Houston won.

Category	Houston Rockets	Washington Wizards
Points	123	118
Field Goals	45-92	44-91
FG%	48.9%	48.4%
3-Pointers	9-25	19-35
3PT%	36.0%	54.3%
Free Throws	24-28	11-14
FT%	85.7%	78.6%
Rebounds	59	27
Assists	21	20
Turnovers	20	12
Steals	10	15
Blocks	5	4

The contrast is striking.

Washington had the better three-point percentage by a significant margin. It also forced more turnovers, recorded more steals, and turned those takeaways into a large transition scoring advantage.

Houston, however, dominated the boards and scored heavily inside.

According to the official game summary, Houston scored 62 points in the paint compared with Washington’s 40. Washington had 24 fast-break points to Houston’s 8, showing how the Wizards used defensive pressure and transition opportunities to compensate for their disadvantage around the basket.

This is one of the clearest ways to understand the game.

Washington’s formula was based heavily on perimeter efficiency, steals, and transition offense.

Houston’s formula relied more on interior scoring, rebounding, free throws, and efficient production from its leading players.

Why Houston Won Despite Washington’s Three-Point Shooting

At first glance, Washington’s 19-of-35 three-point shooting looks like the kind of advantage that should normally lead to a win.

But basketball games are decided by more than one shooting category.

Houston attempted 92 field goals and Washington attempted 91, so shot volume from the field was nearly identical.

The major difference was what happened after those attempts.

Houston grabbed 59 rebounds compared with Washington’s 27.

That is a difference of 32 rebounds.

The Rockets also made 24 free throws, compared with 11 for Washington.

Houston therefore created substantial scoring opportunities around the basket and at the foul line, while Washington leaned much more heavily on its outside shooting.

This explains how Houston could win while making only nine threes.

Washington made ten more three-pointers than Houston, yet still lost by five points.

That is a useful lesson when analyzing any box score. A high three-point percentage can be extremely valuable, but it does not automatically outweigh a major rebounding deficit and a large difference in free-throw scoring.

The Second Quarter Changed the Game

Washington led 30-26 after the first quarter.

Then Houston scored 34 points in the second while Washington scored only 21.

That 34-21 period gave the Rockets a 60-51 halftime lead.

The NBA’s official recap noted that Washington shot extremely well from three-point range in the first half but struggled from inside the arc.

That distinction matters.

A team can have an excellent three-point percentage while still struggling offensively if it cannot consistently convert inside the arc or generate enough free throws.

Houston’s second-quarter advantage created the cushion that later protected it from Washington’s fourth-quarter comeback.

Houston’s Third Quarter Created Separation

The Rockets continued their momentum in the third quarter.

Houston scored 34 points again, while Washington managed 29.

The Rockets’ lead expanded, and their advantage became significant enough that Washington needed an exceptional fourth quarter to recover.

Amen Thompson and Kevin Durant were especially important during Houston’s third-quarter push. The official NBA recap states that Thompson scored 12 points in the third quarter while Durant added 11.

That scoring burst illustrates Houston’s ability to change the game without relying on a single offensive option.

Washington’s Fourth-Quarter Comeback

Washington did not simply fade away.

The Wizards scored 38 points in the fourth quarter, their highest-scoring period of the game.

Houston still scored 29, but Washington finally found the combination of perimeter shooting and transition offense that it needed.

The Wizards finished with 24 fast-break points compared with eight for Houston. Their 15 steals also helped create additional opportunities.

The problem was timing.

Washington’s best quarter came after Houston had already established a substantial advantage.

A 38-point fourth quarter is enough to win many games, but when a team enters the period facing a large deficit, even excellent late offense may not be enough.

Rebounding Was the Defining Statistical Difference

The 59-27 rebounding advantage for Houston deserves special attention.

Houston collected 38 defensive rebounds and 21 offensive rebounds according to the official box score. Washington had 27 total rebounds.

That gave Houston control over possessions.

Alperen Sengun had 13 rebounds.

Amen Thompson had 12.

Clint Capela had 8.

Reed Sheppard had 7.

Kevin Durant had 7.

That distribution is important because Houston did not depend on one player to win the rebounding battle.

Washington, by comparison, struggled to match that collective frontcourt production.

When a team gives up such a large rebounding advantage, it becomes difficult to maintain control even when its perimeter shooting is excellent.

Houston’s Interior Scoring vs Washington’s Perimeter Attack

The Rockets scored 62 points in the paint.

Washington scored 40.

That 22-point difference inside the paint was another major component of the result.

Sengun was central to that interior production.

His 12-of-20 shooting shows how effectively Houston was able to generate high-quality attempts near the basket.

Thompson also shot 10-of-15, adding another highly efficient scoring option.

Washington’s attack looked different.

Coulibaly made five threes.

Cooper made three.

George made three.

Carrington made two.

Champagnie made two.

That perimeter production helped Washington stay competitive, but Houston’s ability to repeatedly generate points closer to the basket gave it a different kind of offensive stability.

Free-Throw Efficiency Also Favored Houston

Houston made 24 of 28 free throws, or 85.7%.

Washington made 11 of 14, or 78.6%.

The difference was 13 made free throws.

Kevin Durant alone made all 11 of his attempts.

This is significant because free throws are efficient scoring opportunities that do not depend on field-goal shooting.

Houston’s ability to reach the line and convert those opportunities helped compensate for Washington’s advantage from three-point range.

Turnovers Tell a Different Story

Washington committed 12 turnovers.

Houston committed 20.

This was one of the few clear statistical areas where Washington had an advantage.

The Wizards also recorded 15 steals compared with Houston’s 10.

Those numbers helped Washington produce 24 fast-break points.

Houston’s 20 turnovers were costly, especially because Washington was aggressive in turning mistakes into transition opportunities.

However, Houston’s rebounding and interior scoring were large enough to offset that weakness.

This is another reason the Washington Wizards vs Houston Rockets match player stats should be read as a complete statistical profile rather than a single-category comparison.

The Importance of Reed Sheppard’s All-Around Production

Sheppard’s 19-point performance deserves special attention because his influence extended across nearly every major category.

He had:

19 points
10 assists
7 rebounds
6 steals
2 blocks

That is a remarkable defensive and playmaking contribution.

His six steals were especially valuable because they matched the entire number of turnovers committed by Kevin Durant individually.

His 10 assists also meant that he was responsible for creating a large number of Houston scoring opportunities.

Even though his field-goal percentage was only 38.9%, his overall contribution was much larger than his shooting line alone suggests.

The Role of Washington’s Bench

Washington received meaningful scoring from its non-starters.

Sharife Cooper scored 21.

Justin Champagnie scored 12.

Jaden Hardy scored 14.

Jamir Watkins added 7.

Will Riley scored 7.

That bench production was a major reason the Wizards remained competitive.

Cooper was particularly efficient. His 21 points on 8-of-10 shooting gave Washington a dependable scoring option when the starters were not producing consistently.

Champagnie’s three steals and one block also provided defensive activity.

The issue was that the overall team rebounding and interior scoring gaps remained too large.

A Closer Look at Shooting Efficiency

Houston finished 45-of-92 from the field.

Washington finished 44-of-91.

That means the overall field-goal percentage difference was very small.

Houston: 48.9%

Washington: 48.4%

The much bigger difference came from shot distribution.

Washington’s 19-of-35 three-point shooting was excellent.

Houston’s 9-of-25 shooting from three was considerably lower in volume and accuracy.

But Houston generated more points from inside the arc and from the free-throw line.

This is a classic example of why field-goal percentage and three-point percentage should be viewed together with free throws, rebounding, turnovers, and shot location.

What the Plus/Minus Numbers Show

Houston’s strongest plus/minus figures included:

Tari Eason: +13
Reed Sheppard: +10
Amen Thompson: +6
Clint Capela: +6
Dorian Finney-Smith: +1

Washington’s strongest figures included:

Sharife Cooper: +7
Bilal Coulibaly: +4
Bub Carrington: +1

These numbers provide useful context, but they should not be treated as standalone measurements of individual performance.

For example, Sengun scored 32 points and collected 13 rebounds but finished at -4.

That does not mean he played poorly. It simply describes the scoring margin while he was on the floor.

Likewise, Cooper’s +7 came in a game where he was highly efficient offensively.

Plus/minus is most useful when combined with the rest of the box score and game context.

Key Statistical Takeaways

The most important numbers from the game are:

Houston won 123-118.
Alperen Sengun led all scorers with 32 points.
Kevin Durant scored 30 points and made all 11 free throws.
Amen Thompson recorded 22 points and 12 rebounds.
Reed Sheppard posted 19 points, 10 assists, 7 rebounds, and 6 steals.
Bilal Coulibaly led Washington with 23 points.
Sharife Cooper scored 21 points on 8-of-10 shooting.
Washington shot 54.3% from three-point range.
Houston controlled the glass 59-27.
Houston scored 62 points in the paint compared with Washington’s 40.
Washington scored 24 fast-break points compared with Houston’s 8.
Washington scored 38 points in the fourth quarter but could not complete the comeback.

Complete Houston Rockets Player Stat Table

Player	PTS	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	+/-
Kevin Durant	30	8-15	3-6	11-11	7	1	0	1	6	-1
Tari Eason	9	4-11	0-2	1-1	6	2	0	1	0	+13
Alperen Sengun	32	12-20	0-1	8-11	13	2	1	1	8	-4
Amen Thompson	22	10-15	1-1	1-1	12	4	2	0	2	+6
Reed Sheppard	19	7-18	4-11	1-2	7	10	6	2	3	+10
Dorian Finney-Smith	5	2-6	1-1	0-0	6	1	1	0	0	+1
Clint Capela	4	1-3	0-0	2-2	8	1	0	0	1	+6
Aaron Holiday	2	1-3	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	-8
Josh Okogie	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	+2

Complete Washington Wizards Player Stat Table

Player	PTS	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	+/-
Julian Reese	2	1-3	0-0	0-0	4	0	3	0	4	-12
Kyshawn George	16	5-13	3-6	3-4	1	2	1	0	0	-5
Bub Carrington	11	4-10	2-3	1-1	5	4	2	0	1	+1
Bilal Coulibaly	23	9-16	5-7	0-0	1	0	1	2	1	+4
Tre Johnson	5	2-10	1-3	0-0	4	3	1	1	0	Not listed
Justin Champagnie	12	5-7	2-3	0-0	2	2	3	1	0	Not listed
Sharife Cooper	21	8-10	3-4	2-2	2	3	0	0	0	+7
Jamir Watkins	7	3-4	1-2	0-0	3	4	1	0	0	Not listed
Jaden Hardy	14	6-9	1-2	1-3	4	1	0	0	0	-9
Will Riley	7	1-9	1-5	4-4	1	1	3	0	0	-13

What This Game Means Statistically

The most useful lesson from this matchup is that Washington’s perimeter efficiency was not enough to overcome Houston’s control of the interior.

Washington made 19 threes.

Houston made only nine.

Yet Houston still scored 123 points.

That happened because the Rockets generated 62 points in the paint, controlled the glass, and made 24 free throws.

The Rockets also received high-level individual production from four players. Sengun and Durant combined for 62 points. Thompson added 22, and Sheppard added 19 with 10 assists and six steals.

Washington had excellent individual performances as well. Coulibaly scored 23, Cooper scored 21, and several other players shot efficiently.

The difference was consistency across the entire statistical profile.

Houston’s production was stronger in areas that tend to create repeated possessions and efficient scoring opportunities: rebounding, interior offense, and free throws.

Washington’s strengths were more dependent on exceptional shooting and transition opportunities.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who led the Houston Rockets in scoring against the Wizards?

Alperen Sengun led Houston with 32 points. He shot 12-of-20 from the field and added 13 rebounds.

Who led the Washington Wizards in scoring?

Bilal Coulibaly led Washington with 23 points. He shot 9-of-16 from the field and made 5-of-7 three-point attempts.

What was the final score between Houston and Washington?

The Houston Rockets defeated the Washington Wizards 123-118.

How many points did Kevin Durant score?

Kevin Durant scored 30 points. He shot 8-of-15 from the field, made three three-pointers, and went 11-of-11 at the free-throw line.

Did Reed Sheppard record a double-double?

Yes. Reed Sheppard finished with 19 points and 10 assists. He also recorded seven rebounds, six steals, and two blocks.

Which team won the rebounding battle?

Houston won the rebounding battle decisively, collecting 59 rebounds compared with Washington’s 27.

Conclusion

The Washington Wizards vs Houston Rockets match player stats from this matchup tell a detailed story about two very different offensive approaches.

Houston won 123-118 because its interior production, rebounding, and free-throw scoring balanced Washington’s outstanding three-point shooting.

Alperen Sengun led the Rockets with 32 points and 13 rebounds. Kevin Durant added 30 points while shooting 8-of-15 and making all 11 of his free throws. Amen Thompson contributed 22 points and 12 rebounds, while Reed Sheppard delivered one of the game’s most complete statistical performances with 19 points, 10 assists, seven rebounds, six steals, and two blocks.

For Washington, Bilal Coulibaly led the way with 23 points, while Sharife Cooper scored 21 on 8-of-10 shooting. The Wizards also received useful scoring from Kyshawn George, Jaden Hardy, Justin Champagnie, Bub Carrington, and other rotation players.

The biggest statistical gap was rebounding. Houston finished with 59 boards compared with Washington’s 27. The Rockets also scored 62 points in the paint, while Washington scored 40. Those advantages helped Houston survive Washington’s 54.3% three-point shooting and 38-point fourth quarter.

For readers studying this game through the box score, the most useful takeaway is that shooting percentages need context. Washington shot better from three, forced more turnovers, and generated more fast-break points. Houston compensated with superior rebounding, interior scoring, and free-throw production.

The official NBA box score and game summary provide the underlying scoring, player statistics, quarter breakdown, and game information used for this analysis. NBA official game box score and summary