Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats

The Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats from October 13, 2025, tell the story of one of the most competitive and dramatic games of the season. Chicago escaped with a narrow 25-24 victory, overcoming Washington by just one point in a matchup filled with strong quarterback play, explosive offensive moments, important defensive contributions, turnovers, and crucial kicking performances.

For fans looking beyond the final score, the individual statistics reveal why this game remained so close from start to finish. Caleb Williams delivered an efficient performance for Chicago, while Jayden Daniels produced three touchdown passes for Washington. D’Andre Swift dominated as a dual-threat offensive weapon, and Chicago’s defense made several plays that ultimately helped determine the result.

The game was particularly interesting because the statistics do not show one team completely dominating the other. Washington had advantages in several important areas, including passing touchdowns and quarterback efficiency. Chicago, however, produced more rushing yards, created a key interception, and received a major contribution from its kicker.

This detailed breakdown examines the complete Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders matchup, including quarterback statistics, rushing leaders, receiving production, defensive performances, turnovers, special teams, and the biggest moments that influenced the final result.

Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats Overview

The October 13, 2025 matchup finished with the Chicago Bears defeating the Washington Commanders 25-24.

It was a one-point game that featured momentum changes throughout all four quarters.

Game Summary

Category	Chicago Bears	Washington Commanders
Final Score	25	24
Season Record After Game	3-2	3-3
Quarter 1	6	0
Quarter 2	7	7
Quarter 3	3	10
Quarter 4	9	7
Team Rushing Yards	150	124
Team Passing Yards	252	211
Team Sacks	3	3
Total Defensive Tackles	74	70

Chicago entered the fourth quarter needing to continue fighting for every point. Washington remained dangerous throughout the contest, especially because Jayden Daniels and the passing offense were capable of producing touchdowns quickly.

The Bears eventually secured the narrow victory through a combination of offensive balance, defensive pressure, a timely interception, and an excellent kicking performance.

Chicago Bears Win 25-24 in a One-Point Battle

A one-point NFL game is rarely decided by a single statistic.

Instead, it usually comes down to a collection of small advantages.

That was exactly what happened in this contest.

Chicago produced 150 rushing yards compared with Washington’s 124. The Bears also forced an interception and recovered important fumbles. Jake Moody added 13 points through field goals and an extra point.

Washington, meanwhile, produced three passing touchdowns and received an excellent performance from Jayden Daniels. The Commanders were highly competitive offensively, but turnovers and missed opportunities became costly in such a close game.

The quarter-by-quarter scoring also demonstrates how competitive the matchup was.

Chicago started quickly with six points in the first quarter while holding Washington scoreless. The teams then traded scoring opportunities during the second quarter.

Washington had its strongest offensive period in the third quarter, scoring 10 points compared with Chicago’s three. However, the Bears responded with nine fourth-quarter points and held Washington to seven, creating the narrow final margin.

Caleb Williams Player Stats and Performance

Caleb Williams started at quarterback for Chicago and completed an efficient performance.

Caleb Williams Passing Statistics

• Completions: 17
• Attempts: 29
• Passing yards: 252
• Passing touchdowns: 1
• Interceptions: 0
• Sacks taken: 3
• Passer rating: 98.6

Williams completed 17 of 29 passes for 252 yards and one touchdown without throwing an interception.

The most important part of his statistical performance was ball security in the passing game.

In a matchup decided by one point, avoiding interceptions can be extremely valuable. Washington’s quarterback threw for three touchdowns and earned a higher passer rating, but Daniels also threw an interception and lost a fumble.

Williams did record one fumble, which shows that Chicago’s offense was not mistake-free. However, the Bears were able to recover from their mistakes more effectively than Washington.

His 252 passing yards also gave Chicago an important advantage in total aerial production. The Bears finished with 41 more passing yards than Washington.

From an analytical perspective, Williams’ performance was efficient rather than overwhelming. He did not need to throw multiple touchdown passes because Chicago’s offense received production from the running game and special teams.

That balance was one of the biggest reasons the Bears remained competitive throughout the game.

Jayden Daniels Player Stats and Performance

Jayden Daniels delivered one of the most statistically impressive individual performances of the game despite Washington’s loss.

Jayden Daniels Passing Statistics

• Completions: 19
• Attempts: 26
• Passing yards: 211
• Passing touchdowns: 3
• Interceptions: 1
• Sacks taken: 3
• Passer rating: 119.2

Daniels completed 19 of 26 passes for 211 yards and three touchdowns.

His 119.2 passer rating was significantly higher than Caleb Williams’ 98.6 rating.

Washington’s quarterback was especially effective at converting passing opportunities into touchdowns. While Chicago finished with one receiving touchdown, Washington produced three.

However, football statistics must always be viewed in context.

A quarterback can have an excellent passer rating while still experiencing costly mistakes. Daniels threw one interception and also recorded two fumbles, with one lost.

Those turnovers became extremely important in a game decided by only one point.

Jayden Daniels as a Rusher

Daniels also contributed significantly to Washington’s rushing attack.

• Carries: 10
• Rushing yards: 52
• Rushing touchdowns: 0

His 52 rushing yards demonstrated his ability to extend plays and contribute outside the traditional passing game.

Washington used Daniels as an important part of its overall rushing production, but Chicago’s rushing offense was ultimately more productive as a team.

The contrast between Daniels’ impressive individual statistics and the final result is an important reminder that quarterback performance alone does not determine who wins.

Turnovers, defense, kicking, and complementary football all matter.

D’Andre Swift Dominates for Chicago

D’Andre Swift was arguably the most important offensive weapon for the Bears.

His impact came through both rushing and receiving.

D’Andre Swift Rushing Stats

• Carries: 14
• Rushing yards: 108
• Average: 7.7 yards per carry
• Rushing touchdowns: 0

Swift rushed for 108 yards on only 14 carries.

His average of 7.7 yards per carry was outstanding.

Crossing the 100-yard mark is always significant, but doing so on just 14 carries demonstrates exceptional efficiency. Chicago did not need to repeatedly hand him the ball for him to create meaningful production.

Swift’s rushing performance was one of the clearest statistical advantages for the Bears.

Washington’s leading rusher, Jacory Croskey-Merritt, carried the ball more times but produced fewer yards.

D’Andre Swift Receiving Stats

Swift also made an explosive contribution as a receiver.

• Receptions: 2
• Receiving yards: 67
• Receiving touchdowns: 1

His two receptions produced 67 yards and a touchdown.

That means Swift was not simply a traditional running back accumulating yards on the ground. He created explosive plays through the passing game as well.

Combining his rushing and receiving production gives a clearer picture of his overall impact.

He finished with:

• 108 rushing yards
• 67 receiving yards
• 175 total yards from scrimmage
• One receiving touchdown

That level of versatility created major problems for Washington’s defense.

A player capable of producing explosive plays as both a runner and receiver forces defenses to make difficult decisions. Defenders cannot focus entirely on the passing game or completely commit to stopping the run.

Swift’s performance was therefore one of the most important storylines in the Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats.

Jacory Croskey-Merritt Leads Washington’s Running Game

Jacory Croskey-Merritt led Washington’s rushing attack.

Jacory Croskey-Merritt Stats

• Carries: 17
• Rushing yards: 61
• Rushing touchdowns: 0

He received more carries than Swift but averaged significantly fewer yards per attempt.

Washington gave him 17 opportunities, showing a commitment to the running game, but Chicago’s defense prevented him from producing the same explosive efficiency that Swift achieved.

The Commanders finished with 124 rushing yards as a team.

That is respectable production, but Chicago’s 150 rushing yards provided a meaningful advantage.

Washington also had to account for Jayden Daniels’ 52 rushing yards, meaning the quarterback played a major role in the team’s ground attack.

Chicago’s Rushing Attack Produces 150 Yards

Chicago finished with:

• 27 carries
• 150 rushing yards
• 5.4 yards per carry
• One rushing touchdown

A team average of 5.4 yards per rushing attempt is highly productive.

The Bears were able to move the football efficiently on the ground without becoming overly predictable.

The biggest advantage came from explosive efficiency. D’Andre Swift averaged 7.7 yards per carry, helping lift the entire team’s average.

A productive rushing attack also supports the quarterback.

When an offense can consistently gain yards on the ground, defenses have to respect play-action opportunities and cannot simply focus on pass rush pressure.

That likely helped Chicago create balance between Caleb Williams’ passing production and its rushing success.

Chicago Bears Receiving Leaders

Although D’Andre Swift led Chicago in receiving yards, several players contributed.

Chicago Receiving Statistics

Player	Receptions	Receiving Yards	Touchdowns
D’Andre Swift	2	67	1
Luther Burden III	4	51	0
DJ Moore	3	42	0
Rome Odunze	2	32	0

Chicago completed 17 passes for 252 receiving yards.

D’Andre Swift

Swift created the biggest receiving impact with 67 yards and a touchdown on just two receptions.

That production suggests explosive plays rather than high-volume possession receiving.

Luther Burden III

Luther Burden III caught four passes for 51 yards.

He led Chicago in receptions among the listed leading receivers and provided important consistency for the passing attack.

His role helped prevent Washington from focusing entirely on Chicago’s most explosive weapons.

DJ Moore

DJ Moore recorded:

• 3 receptions
• 42 yards

His contribution added another productive layer to the Bears’ offense.

Rome Odunze

Rome Odunze added:

• 2 receptions
• 32 yards

Chicago’s receiving production was distributed across several offensive players.

That distribution was important because the Bears did not depend entirely on one wide receiver.

Washington Commanders Receiving Leaders

Washington’s receiving group produced three touchdowns.

Washington Receiving Statistics

Player	Receptions	Receiving Yards	Touchdowns
Zach Ertz	6	43	1
Chris Moore	3	46	0
Jaylin Lane	1	37	0
Luke McCaffrey	1	33	1

Washington finished with:

• 19 receptions
• 211 receiving yards
• 3 receiving touchdowns

Zach Ertz Leads in Receptions

Zach Ertz caught six passes for 43 yards and one touchdown.

He was Washington’s leader in receptions.

His performance reflected a reliable short-to-intermediate receiving role. While he did not lead the team in yards, his six catches provided Daniels with a dependable target.

Chris Moore Adds Yardage

Chris Moore recorded:

• 3 receptions
• 46 yards

His production helped Washington maintain balance in the passing game.

Jaylin Lane Creates an Explosive Play

Jaylin Lane caught one pass for 37 yards.

A single reception producing 37 yards demonstrates the value of explosive plays.

Even when a receiver does not have a high catch total, one major gain can dramatically influence field position and offensive momentum.

Luke McCaffrey Scores a Touchdown

Luke McCaffrey recorded:

• 1 reception
• 33 yards
• 1 touchdown

His touchdown was another example of Washington’s ability to convert passing opportunities into points.

Washington’s offense was highly effective in the red-zone and scoring areas through the air, producing three receiving touchdowns despite finishing with fewer total passing yards than Chicago.

Quarterback Comparison: Caleb Williams vs Jayden Daniels

The quarterback comparison is one of the most interesting parts of the game.

Statistic	Caleb Williams	Jayden Daniels
Completions	17	19
Attempts	29	26
Passing Yards	252	211
Passing TDs	1	3
Interceptions	0	1
Sacks	3	3
Passer Rating	98.6	119.2

Daniels had the stronger passer rating and more touchdown passes.

Williams produced more passing yards and avoided an interception.

Both quarterbacks took three sacks.

The major difference came in the overall turnover picture.

Daniels threw an interception and lost a fumble. Williams did not throw an interception, although he did record one fumble.

In a one-point game, those details matter enormously.

The numbers demonstrate why raw passing statistics should never be analyzed in isolation.

Three touchdown passes look impressive, and Daniels deserved credit for his offensive production. However, turnovers can cancel out excellent offensive work when the opposing team converts mistakes into opportunities.

Jaquan Brisker’s Interception Changes the Defensive Picture

Chicago’s defense recorded one interception.

Jaquan Brisker Defensive Stats

• Interceptions: 1
• Interception return yards: 32

Brisker’s interception was one of the most important defensive contributions of the game.

Washington did not record an interception against Chicago.

That gave the Bears a clear advantage in takeaways through the passing game.

A 32-yard return also increased the value of the interception. Instead of simply ending Washington’s possession, Brisker helped create a significant field-position change.

In a close contest, field position can be almost as important as the turnover itself.

Tremaine Edmunds Leads Chicago’s Defense

Tremaine Edmunds was Chicago’s leading tackler.

Tremaine Edmunds Stats

• Total tackles: 12

Recording 12 tackles shows how active Edmunds was throughout the game.

Washington ran the ball 31 times and also relied on Daniels as a mobile quarterback. That created numerous situations where linebackers needed to make plays against both runners and receivers.

Edmunds’ tackling production suggests a major role in limiting Washington after initial gains.

Chicago’s defense finished with:

• 74 total tackles
• 34 solo tackles
• 3 sacks

The Bears did not completely shut down Washington’s offense. The Commanders scored 24 points and produced three passing touchdowns.

However, Chicago made enough critical plays to win.

Bobby Wagner Leads Washington’s Defense

Bobby Wagner led Washington with nine total tackles.

Bobby Wagner Stats

• Total tackles: 9

Washington’s defense also recorded three sacks.

That matched Chicago’s sack total.

Both teams were therefore able to generate pressure against the opposing quarterback.

The difference was that Chicago also recorded an interception, creating an additional defensive takeaway.

Washington’s defense faced a difficult challenge because Chicago’s offense was balanced. The Bears produced 252 passing yards and 150 rushing yards.

Defending an offense that can create production both through the air and on the ground requires discipline at every level.

Turnovers Become a Major Difference

The turnover battle provides one of the clearest explanations for the final result.

Chicago Turnovers

Caleb Williams recorded one fumble.

However, Chicago also had defensive players Kyler Gordon and Nahshon Wright record recoveries.

Washington Turnovers

Jayden Daniels recorded:

• 2 fumbles
• 1 fumble lost

Jacory Croskey-Merritt recorded:

• 1 fumble
• 1 fumble lost

Daniels also threw one interception.

This created a major problem for Washington.

The Commanders produced strong offensive statistics, but turnovers reduced the value of that production.

A useful way to understand football is to separate production from possession value.

An offense can gain significant yards, complete passes, and score touchdowns. But if possessions are lost through interceptions and fumbles, the team gives opportunities back to the opponent.

Washington’s statistics show exactly why turnover management matters.

The Commanders were capable of moving the football and scoring. Their challenge was protecting possessions.

Chicago made mistakes too, but the Bears were more successful at surviving them.

Jake Moody Delivers 13 Important Points

Special teams played a major role in Chicago’s victory.

Jake Moody Kicking Stats

• Field goals made: 4
• Field goals attempted: 5
• Field goal percentage: 80%
• Longest field goal: 48 yards
• Extra points: 1 of 1
• Total points: 13

Moody scored 13 points.

In a game Chicago won by one point, that contribution cannot be ignored.

Four successful field goals provided consistent scoring even when the Bears were unable to finish every offensive drive with a touchdown.

This is one of the strongest examples of how kicking affects close NFL games.

An offense does not need to score touchdowns on every possession if it can consistently enter field-goal range and convert those opportunities.

Chicago’s kicking game gave the team a reliable source of points.

Matt Gay’s Performance for Washington

Washington kicker Matt Gay recorded:

• Field goals made: 1
• Field goals attempted: 2
• Field goal percentage: 50%
• Longest field goal: 53 yards
• Extra points: 3 of 3
• Total points: 6

Gay successfully converted all three extra points but made only one of two field-goal attempts.

The contrast with Chicago’s kicking production is important.

Moody scored 13 points.

Gay scored six.

That seven-point difference does not directly explain every aspect of the game, but it shows how strongly kicking efficiency influenced the overall scoring battle.

When the final margin is one point, every missed scoring opportunity becomes more significant.

Kick Return Statistics

Chicago received a strong contribution from Devin Duvernay.

Devin Duvernay Kick Return Stats

• Returns: 5
• Return yards: 120
• Average: 24.0 yards

Duvernay consistently helped Chicago establish field position.

Washington’s leading kick returner was Luke McCaffrey.

Luke McCaffrey Kick Return Stats

• Returns: 4
• Return yards: 127
• Average: 31.8 yards

McCaffrey produced an even higher average than Duvernay.

His 31.8-yard average created valuable opportunities for Washington’s offense.

Special teams statistics often receive less attention than passing and rushing numbers, but return yardage can quietly influence an entire game.

Starting a drive closer to midfield can reduce the number of successful plays an offense needs to reach scoring range.

Punt Return and Punting Statistics

Chicago did not record any punt returns.

Washington’s Jaylin Lane recorded:

• 1 punt return
• 9 yards

Tory Taylor Punting Stats

Chicago punter Tory Taylor recorded:

• 2 punts
• 106 total yards
• 53.0-yard average
• 1 punt inside the 20

A 53-yard average demonstrates strong punting distance.

Tress Way Punting Stats

Washington punter Tress Way recorded:

• 1 punt
• 30 yards
• 30.0-yard average
• 1 punt inside the 20

Chicago’s stronger punting numbers provided another small field-position advantage.

Again, the final score makes these details more meaningful.

In a one-point game, small advantages can collectively determine the winner.

Why Chicago Won the Game

The Bears won because they created a better overall balance across several phases of football.

1. More Efficient Rushing Production

Chicago produced 150 rushing yards at 5.4 yards per carry.

Washington produced 124 rushing yards at 4.0 yards per carry.

D’Andre Swift’s 108-yard performance was the biggest difference.

2. Better Ball Security in the Passing Game

Caleb Williams threw zero interceptions.

Jayden Daniels threw one.

Although both teams experienced fumble issues, Washington’s lost possessions became particularly costly.

3. A Key Defensive Interception

Jaquan Brisker’s interception and 32-yard return gave Chicago an important takeaway.

Washington did not record an interception.

4. Jake Moody’s 13 Points

Moody converted four of five field goals and scored 13 points.

Chicago consistently turned scoring opportunities into points.

5. Offensive Balance

Chicago produced:

• 252 passing yards
• 150 rushing yards

That balance made the Bears difficult to defend.

Washington’s offense was productive, but Chicago’s combination of passing, rushing, defense, and kicking ultimately created the winning formula.

What Washington Did Well Despite the Loss

The Commanders should not be viewed as a team that performed poorly across the board.

Several areas were highly effective.

Jayden Daniels threw three touchdown passes and completed 19 of 26 attempts.

Zach Ertz caught six passes and scored a touchdown.

Luke McCaffrey added a touchdown reception.

Washington scored 24 points and held Chicago to a one-point victory.

The team also recorded three sacks, matching Chicago’s defensive sack total.

The main challenge was not the ability to produce offense.

The main challenge was protecting possessions and avoiding costly mistakes.

This distinction matters when analyzing player statistics.

A team can have strong individual performances and still lose because football is ultimately a game of total execution.

Biggest Individual Performances

Several players stood out statistically.

D’Andre Swift

Swift was arguably Chicago’s most complete offensive performer.

• 108 rushing yards
• 67 receiving yards
• 175 total yards
• 1 touchdown

Jayden Daniels

Daniels produced impressive passing statistics.

• 19 completions
• 211 passing yards
• 3 passing touchdowns
• 119.2 passer rating
• 52 rushing yards

Caleb Williams

Williams delivered efficient quarterback play.

• 252 passing yards
• 1 touchdown
• 0 interceptions
• 98.6 passer rating

Tremaine Edmunds

Edmunds led Chicago defensively.

• 12 total tackles

Jaquan Brisker

Brisker made the biggest takeaway.

• 1 interception
• 32 return yards

Jake Moody

Moody provided crucial scoring.

• 4 field goals
• 13 total points

Key Lessons From the Match Statistics

This matchup offers several useful lessons for anyone studying NFL player statistics.

Statistics Must Be Viewed Together

A passer rating alone cannot explain who won.

Daniels had the higher rating, but Chicago won.

That happened because football includes turnovers, rushing efficiency, defense, field position, and special teams.

Explosive Players Can Change a Game Quickly

D’Andre Swift needed only 14 carries to produce 108 rushing yards.

He also generated 67 receiving yards on two catches.

High-impact plays can sometimes be more important than high volume.

Turnovers Become More Important in Close Games

Washington lost important possessions through an interception and fumbles.

When the final margin is one point, even one mistake can completely change the outcome.

Kickers Can Be Game-Changing Players

Jake Moody’s 13 points were essential.

Kickers are sometimes discussed only after missed attempts, but consistent field-goal production can be one of the biggest advantages in a close game.

Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats: Complete Analysis

The complete Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats reveal a game where both teams had strong performers but Chicago executed slightly better in the areas that mattered most.

Washington had the quarterback with the higher passer rating.

Washington also produced three passing touchdowns.

Chicago, however, gained more total passing yards, rushed more effectively, forced an interception, and received a major scoring contribution from its kicker.

D’Andre Swift was the most productive all-around offensive player for Chicago. His 175 yards from scrimmage gave the Bears explosive production from multiple areas of the offense.

Caleb Williams avoided throwing an interception and delivered 252 passing yards.

Chicago’s defense, led by Tremaine Edmunds and Jaquan Brisker, made important contributions.

Washington had several excellent individual performances, especially from Jayden Daniels and Zach Ertz, but turnovers prevented the Commanders from turning their offensive production into a victory.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders game on October 13, 2025?

The Chicago Bears won the game 25-24, defeating the Washington Commanders by one point.

How many passing yards did Caleb Williams have?

Caleb Williams completed 17 of 29 passes for 252 yards, one touchdown, and zero interceptions.

How did Jayden Daniels perform against Chicago?

Jayden Daniels completed 19 of 26 passes for 211 yards, three touchdowns, and one interception. He also rushed for 52 yards.

Who was the leading rusher in the game?

D’Andre Swift was the leading rusher with 108 yards on 14 carries for Chicago.

Who had the most receiving yards for Chicago?

D’Andre Swift led Chicago with 67 receiving yards and one touchdown.

Who led Chicago’s defense in tackles?

Tremaine Edmunds led the Chicago Bears with 12 total tackles.

Conclusion

The Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats provide a detailed explanation for Chicago’s narrow 25-24 victory.

The game featured excellent quarterback play from both Caleb Williams and Jayden Daniels, but their performances influenced the game in different ways. Daniels threw three touchdown passes and achieved a 119.2 passer rating, while Williams produced more passing yards and avoided an interception.

D’Andre Swift delivered the most explosive all-around offensive performance for Chicago with 175 total yards from scrimmage and a touchdown. His ability to dominate both as a runner and receiver gave the Bears an important offensive advantage.

Defensively, Jaquan Brisker’s interception and Tremaine Edmunds’ 12 tackles helped Chicago make key stops. Jake Moody’s 13 points also proved extremely valuable in a contest decided by only one point.

Washington demonstrated that it had enough offensive talent to win the game. Three passing touchdowns, strong receiving contributions, and Jayden Daniels’ dual-threat ability kept the Commanders competitive throughout the matchup. However, turnovers and missed opportunities ultimately made the difference.

The final statistics show an important truth about close NFL games: winning is rarely about dominating every category. Chicago found small advantages in rushing efficiency, turnovers, defense, and kicking, and those advantages combined to create a one-point victory.