Cleveland Cavaliers vs Houston Rockets Match Player Stats

The cleveland cavaliers vs houston rockets match player stats from the Rockets’ 114-104 win provide a useful look at how individual production, rebounding, shooting efficiency, and fourth-quarter execution shaped the game. Houston built a large early advantage, Cleveland fought back strongly in the third quarter, and the Rockets ultimately responded with a 40-point fourth quarter to close out the victory.

The game was played at Rocket Arena in Cleveland, with an announced attendance of 19,432. The official NBA record lists the game as Wednesday, November 19, 2025, while some schedule displays show November 20 because of the date transition associated with the listing. The official box score confirms the 114-104 final score and the complete player statistics. (NBA.com)

For readers studying this matchup beyond the final score, the most important story is not simply that Houston scored 114 points. It is how the Rockets combined Alperen Sengun’s interior production, Amen Thompson’s all-around defense, Aaron Holiday’s fourth-quarter scoring, and a major rebounding advantage to withstand Cleveland’s second-half comeback.

Cleveland Cavaliers vs Houston Rockets Match Player Stats

Here is the core statistical picture from the game.

Category	Houston Rockets	Cleveland Cavaliers
Final Score	114	104
Field Goals	41-90	36-81
Field Goal Percentage	45.6%	44.4%
3-Pointers	9-24	12-39
3-Point Percentage	37.5%	30.8%
Free Throws	23-27	20-32
Free Throw Percentage	85.2%	62.5%
Rebounds	51	39
Assists	23	20
Turnovers	13	12
Steals	9	4
Blocks	4	5
Offensive Rebounds	16	10
Defensive Rebounds	35	29

The NBA’s official box score confirms that Houston made 41 of 90 field-goal attempts, while Cleveland made 36 of 81. Houston also won the rebounding battle 51-39 and converted 23 of 27 free throws. (NBA.com)

Those numbers explain why the Rockets were able to win despite Cleveland making more three-pointers.

Game Result and Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

Houston opened the game with a 33-19 first quarter. The Rockets then added a 24-21 advantage in the second quarter, taking a 57-40 lead into halftime.

That 17-point halftime margin was important because Cleveland responded aggressively after the break.

The Cavaliers won the third quarter 30-17, cutting Houston’s advantage to only seven points entering the fourth. Cleveland’s third-quarter comeback included a 23-5 run that transformed a 22-point deficit into a much more competitive game. (NBA.com)

The fourth quarter then became the decisive period.

Houston scored 40 points in the final quarter compared with Cleveland’s 34. The Rockets therefore did not simply survive the comeback. They restored control by producing their highest-scoring quarter of the night when the game was most competitive.

The quarter scoring was:

• First quarter: Houston 33, Cleveland 19
• Second quarter: Houston 24, Cleveland 21
• Third quarter: Houston 17, Cleveland 30
• Fourth quarter: Houston 40, Cleveland 34

The official NBA game summary confirms the 114-104 final and this exact quarter sequence. (NBA.com)

Alperen Sengun Leads Houston’s Interior Attack

Alperen Sengun was one of the most important players in the matchup.

He finished with:

• 28 points
• 11 rebounds
• 7 assists
• 10-of-17 shooting
• 8-of-10 free throws
• 1 steal
• 1 block

His 10 made field goals were a game high for Houston, and his 58.8% shooting was particularly important because he provided efficient offense without depending on three-point shooting.

Sengun’s seven assists also show why his influence went beyond scoring. Houston could use him as a scoring threat and a passing hub, forcing Cleveland’s defense to account for his decisions around the paint.

His 11 rebounds added another dimension. Houston finished with 51 total rebounds, and Sengun was one of three Rockets players to reach at least nine boards.

The official NBA box score records Sengun’s 28-point, 11-rebound, seven-assist performance. (NBA.com)

Why Sengun’s Efficiency Mattered

Sengun attempted 17 shots and made 10. He also went 8-for-10 at the free-throw line.

That gave him 28 points on relatively efficient shooting volume.

This matters when analyzing a game such as this because raw scoring totals do not always tell the complete story. A player can score 28 points through difficult, high-volume shooting, or he can reach the same total while consistently creating efficient possessions.

Sengun’s performance leaned toward the latter.

He also committed five turnovers, so his night was not flawless. However, his overall offensive contribution remained central to Houston’s ability to generate points inside and maintain an attacking presence when Cleveland tightened its perimeter defense.

Kevin Durant’s Contribution

Kevin Durant finished with 20 points, three rebounds and three assists.

His shooting line was:

• 6-of-18 from the field
• 1-of-6 from three
• 7-of-8 from the free-throw line

The 20 points were valuable, but his efficiency was below his normal scoring standards in this particular game.

Durant shot 33.3% from the field and 16.7% from three. Houston therefore did not need an elite shooting night from Durant to win.

That is an important part of the Rockets’ statistical profile in this matchup.

When one major scorer is not converting at a high rate, a team needs other players to create efficient offense. Sengun supplied that efficiency, while Aaron Holiday provided a major scoring burst from the bench.

Durant also finished with a positive plus-minus of six. (NBA.com)

Amen Thompson’s All-Around Impact

Amen Thompson produced one of the more interesting statistical lines of the game.

He recorded:

• 12 points
• 9 rebounds
• 6 assists
• 5 steals
• 6-of-14 shooting

The five steals stand out immediately.

Thompson’s value was not limited to scoring. He contributed on the glass, created opportunities for teammates and generated turnovers defensively.

His six assists were the second-highest total among Houston players, behind Sengun’s seven. His nine rebounds also tied Jabari Smith Jr. for second among the Rockets.

Thompson played more than 40 minutes and finished with a plus-minus of eight. The official box score confirms all of those figures. (NBA.com)

Thompson’s Defensive Numbers

Five steals are particularly significant because Cleveland recorded only four steals as a team.

That means Thompson alone produced more steals than the entire Cavaliers roster.

Steals do not automatically translate into a win, but they can create additional possessions and disrupt offensive rhythm. Houston finished with nine steals overall, more than twice Cleveland’s total.

That difference fits the broader defensive story of the game.

Aaron Holiday’s Fourth-Quarter Explosion

Aaron Holiday finished with 18 points despite playing only 19 minutes and 17 seconds.

His shooting line was extremely efficient:

• 5-of-7 field goals
• 3-of-5 three-pointers
• 5-of-5 free throws

Most importantly, the NBA’s official game recap reported that Holiday scored 14 of his 18 points in the fourth quarter. (NBA.com)

That is one of the clearest explanations for Houston’s fourth-quarter response.

Cleveland had already reduced the deficit dramatically. The Cavaliers were threatening to turn the game completely around. Houston then received an explosive scoring contribution from a reserve guard at exactly the point where the pressure increased.

Holiday’s performance demonstrates why bench scoring needs to be considered when evaluating a box score.

Houston did not depend exclusively on its biggest names.

Jabari Smith Jr. Provides Spacing and Rebounding

Jabari Smith Jr. scored 14 points and collected nine rebounds.

He shot:

• 5-of-12 overall
• 3-of-6 from three
• 1-of-2 at the line

His 50% three-point shooting was particularly useful because it gave Houston another frontcourt player capable of stretching the floor.

Smith also collected seven defensive rebounds and two offensive rebounds.

His contribution was therefore split between spacing and possession control.

When a team already has Sengun operating inside, having a forward capable of knocking down outside shots can make defensive positioning more difficult.

Steven Adams Controls the Glass

Steven Adams finished with six points and 11 rebounds.

His 11 rebounds included six offensive boards and five defensive rebounds.

That is a major detail.

Offensive rebounds can create second-chance possessions, and Adams alone accounted for six of Houston’s 16 offensive rebounds.

Houston therefore did not simply shoot better in selected areas. The Rockets repeatedly gave themselves additional opportunities by attacking the offensive glass.

Adams also contributed three assists and one block.

His scoring was limited, but the box score shows how much of his value came from physical play and possession creation.

Houston’s Supporting Cast

The Rockets received several useful contributions outside their primary starters.

Reed Sheppard scored 12 points on 5-of-11 shooting and added two three-pointers.

Clint Capela scored four points while collecting five rebounds and two blocks.

Those blocks were notable because Houston’s team total was four.

Jae’Sean Tate played only a short stretch and finished without a statistical contribution. Josh Okogie also did not score.

The distribution of production shows that Houston did not receive a huge contribution from every rotation player. Instead, several key players carried different parts of the workload.

Cleveland Cavaliers Player Statistics

Cleveland’s offense was led by De’Andre Hunter and Donovan Mitchell.

Hunter scored 25 points, while Mitchell added 21.

Evan Mobley contributed 18 points.

Together, those three players accounted for 64 of Cleveland’s 104 points.

The official NBA box score confirms their individual production and shooting figures. (NBA.com)

De’Andre Hunter Leads Cleveland in Scoring

De’Andre Hunter scored 25 points on 6-of-11 shooting.

His shooting performance was efficient:

• 54.5% from the field
• 5-of-8 from three
• 8-of-8 at the free-throw line

His 62.5% three-point shooting was one of Cleveland’s biggest positive shooting performances.

Hunter’s perfect 8-for-8 free-throw performance also helped Cleveland maintain scoring pressure.

However, individual efficiency could not fully compensate for the Cavaliers’ team-wide problems at the free-throw line and from three-point range.

Hunter finished with a minus-six plus-minus, which was considerably better than several other Cleveland starters. (NBA.com)

Donovan Mitchell’s 21-Point Performance

Donovan Mitchell scored 21 points on 8-of-17 shooting.

He also made three of nine three-point attempts and converted both free throws.

His two steals added defensive value.

One particularly important detail came in the fourth quarter. According to the official game recap, Mitchell scored 19 of his 21 points in the final period as Cleveland attempted to complete the comeback. (NBA.com)

That fourth-quarter scoring surge illustrates how dramatically the game changed after halftime.

Mitchell’s overall plus-minus was minus-18, however, reflecting the substantial margin Houston built during the stretches in which he was on the floor.

Evan Mobley Adds 18 Points

Evan Mobley scored 18 points and grabbed six rebounds.

He shot 7-of-13 from the field, which was a strong 53.8%.

However, his free-throw shooting was a major issue.

Mobley went 4-of-10 from the free-throw line.

The NBA’s official recap specifically noted that he missed six of his 10 free throws. (NBA.com)

Those missed opportunities mattered in a game ultimately decided by 10 points.

Mobley’s field-goal efficiency was strong, but his free-throw conversion reduced the overall value of his scoring opportunities.

Jarrett Allen’s Role

Jarrett Allen recorded:

• 8 points
• 7 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 1 steal

He shot 4-of-9 from the field.

Allen’s seven rebounds were useful, but Cleveland’s overall rebounding deficit remained significant.

Houston collected 51 rebounds compared with Cleveland’s 39.

That 12-rebound difference is one of the clearest statistical separators between the teams.

Cleveland’s Bench Contributions

Craig Porter Jr. produced a useful all-around line with nine points, seven rebounds, five assists and two blocks.

He shot 4-of-6 from the field.

Lonzo Ball added seven points, two rebounds and two assists, although he made only two of eight field-goal attempts.

Dean Wade finished with four points, seven rebounds, three assists and two blocks.

Tyrese Proctor added two points and three assists.

Thomas Bryant did not score.

The bench was therefore a mixed group for Cleveland. Porter provided efficient offense and playmaking, while Wade contributed in several categories despite shooting only 1-of-5.

Shooting Efficiency Comparison

One of the most useful ways to understand the matchup is to separate shooting volume from shooting efficiency.

Houston:

• 41-of-90 from the field
• 45.6% overall
• 9-of-24 from three
• 37.5% from three
• 23-of-27 free throws
• 85.2% from the line

Cleveland:

• 36-of-81 from the field
• 44.4% overall
• 12-of-39 from three
• 30.8% from three
• 20-of-32 free throws
• 62.5% from the line

Cleveland actually made three more three-pointers.

The difference was efficiency.

Houston shot 37.5% from three compared with Cleveland’s 30.8%.

The larger gap came at the free-throw line, where Houston converted 85.2% compared with Cleveland’s 62.5%.

Cleveland also attempted five more free throws, but Houston made three more.

That combination helped Houston offset Cleveland’s three-point advantage in made baskets.

The Rebounding Battle

The 51-39 rebounding difference deserves special attention.

Houston collected 16 offensive rebounds.

Cleveland collected only 10.

That six-rebound difference on the offensive glass created additional opportunities for Houston.

Steven Adams was especially important, grabbing six offensive rebounds by himself.

Sengun added two offensive rebounds, while Thompson had three.

Jabari Smith Jr. contributed another two.

This was not the work of a single player.

It was a team-wide commitment to extending possessions.

Turnovers Were Nearly Even

Turnovers were not a major separator.

Houston committed 13 turnovers.

Cleveland committed 12.

That is only a one-turnover difference.

The larger distinction was what Houston did defensively.

The Rockets recorded nine steals compared with Cleveland’s four.

Houston also scored 11 fast-break points, while Cleveland scored 18.

Therefore, Houston did not win because Cleveland repeatedly gave the ball away.

Instead, the Rockets gained advantages through rebounding, shooting efficiency and timely scoring.

Free Throws Were a Major Factor

Houston went 23-of-27 at the free-throw line.

Cleveland went 20-of-32.

The 85.2% conversion rate from Houston was excellent.

Cleveland’s 62.5% mark left 12 free throws unconverted.

In a 10-point game, that becomes a meaningful statistical detail.

The contrast becomes even more interesting because Cleveland attempted more free throws.

The Cavaliers had opportunities but did not convert them at the same rate.

How Houston Built Its Halftime Lead

Houston’s first-half performance was the foundation of the victory.

The Rockets led 33-19 after one quarter and extended that advantage in the second.

At halftime, Houston held a 57-40 lead.

Sengun had 10 points and six rebounds by halftime, while Durant had 13 points. The Rockets’ interior attack and early shooting allowed them to build separation before Cleveland found its rhythm. (NBA.com)

This is an important lesson when examining the box score.

The final score makes the game look relatively close because the margin was only 10 points.

The game itself was more volatile.

Houston’s early advantage was much larger, while Cleveland’s third-quarter response temporarily changed the shape of the contest.

Cleveland’s Third-Quarter Comeback

The Cavaliers won the third quarter 30-17.

Houston’s offense slowed considerably during the period.

Cleveland, meanwhile, found more success around the basket and began reducing the deficit.

The Cavaliers closed the third quarter on a 23-5 run and entered the final period only four points behind at 74-70 according to the official game recap. (NBA.com)

That comeback demonstrated Cleveland’s ability to respond after a poor first half.

Mobley scored eight points during the third-quarter surge, while Lonzo Ball contributed seven.

But the comeback created a new challenge: Cleveland needed to sustain that level of offense against a Houston team that had already shown the ability to score efficiently.

Why the Fourth Quarter Decided the Game

The final quarter was the highest-scoring period for both teams.

Houston scored 40.

Cleveland scored 34.

The difference was not enormous in isolation, but it came after Cleveland had reduced the margin to four points.

Holiday’s fourth-quarter scoring was crucial.

Mitchell also exploded offensively for Cleveland, scoring 19 points in the period.

Yet Houston found enough offense from multiple sources to prevent Cleveland from completing the comeback.

This is where the full box score becomes more informative than simply looking at the leading scorers.

Houston had Sengun, Holiday, Durant, Thompson and Smith contributing in different ways.

Cleveland relied heavily on Hunter, Mitchell and Mobley for its scoring output.

What the Plus-Minus Numbers Tell Us

Plus-minus should never be treated as a complete player evaluation, but it can provide useful context when combined with the rest of the box score.

Houston’s notable plus-minus figures included:

• Jabari Smith Jr.: +10
• Amen Thompson: +8
• Kevin Durant: +6
• Steven Adams: +6
• Aaron Holiday: +6
• Reed Sheppard: +7

Cleveland’s numbers included:

• Lonzo Ball: +1
• Craig Porter Jr.: -3
• De’Andre Hunter: -6
• Jarrett Allen: -9
• Evan Mobley: -10
• Donovan Mitchell: -18

Mitchell’s minus-18 does not mean he was Cleveland’s least productive player. He scored 21 points and had two steals.

It simply records the team’s scoring margin while he was on the court.

This distinction is important when using player statistics responsibly.

A Closer Look at the Main Statistical Differences

Several differences separate the two teams.

Houston won the rebounding battle

Houston had 51 rebounds against Cleveland’s 39.

The Rockets also grabbed 16 offensive rebounds.

Houston shot free throws more efficiently

The Rockets made 85.2% of their free throws.

Cleveland made 62.5%.

Cleveland made more three-pointers

The Cavaliers made 12 threes.

Houston made nine.

But Cleveland needed 39 attempts to reach that total, while Houston attempted 24.

Houston generated more steals

Houston recorded nine steals.

Cleveland recorded four.

Houston assisted more

The Rockets had 23 assists.

The Cavaliers had 20.

No single category explains the entire game. The result came from several smaller advantages combining over 48 minutes.

What the Player Stats Say About Houston’s Offensive Structure

Houston’s scoring distribution suggests a balanced offensive approach.

Sengun was the primary interior scorer and facilitator.

Durant provided high-level shot creation even though his shooting percentage was modest.

Smith supplied floor spacing and rebounding.

Thompson contributed transition pressure, defense and passing.

Holiday supplied an important scoring punch from the bench.

This combination made it difficult for Cleveland to rely on stopping one player.

If Cleveland focused on Sengun, other Houston players could create opportunities.

If the defense concentrated on perimeter threats, Houston could continue attacking through its frontcourt.

What the Numbers Say About Cleveland’s Offensive Structure

Cleveland had strong individual scoring performances.

Hunter scored 25.

Mitchell scored 21.

Mobley scored 18.

Those three players combined for 64 points.

The problem was consistency across the entire rotation.

Cleveland shot only 44.4% overall and 30.8% from three.

The Cavaliers also left significant points at the free-throw line.

The result was an offense capable of making a major comeback but not consistent enough across the entire game to overcome Houston’s early advantage.

Cleveland Cavaliers vs Houston Rockets Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways

The most useful takeaways from the statistical record are straightforward.

1. Alperen Sengun was Houston’s leading scorer with 28 points.
2. De’Andre Hunter led Cleveland with 25 points.
3. Donovan Mitchell scored 21 points and produced 19 of them in the fourth quarter.
4. Aaron Holiday scored 14 of his 18 points in the fourth quarter.
5. Houston outrebounded Cleveland 51-39.
6. Houston grabbed 16 offensive rebounds.
7. Houston shot 85.2% from the free-throw line.
8. Cleveland shot 30.8% from three-point range.
9. Amen Thompson recorded five steals, six assists and nine rebounds.
10. Houston scored 40 fourth-quarter points after Cleveland had reduced the deficit to four.

These statistics provide a much clearer explanation of the final result than the scoring totals alone. (NBA.com)

Player-by-Player Statistical Summary

Houston Rockets

Player	PTS	REB	AST	FG
Alperen Sengun	28	11	7	10-17
Kevin Durant	20	3	3	6-18
Aaron Holiday	18	0	0	5-7
Jabari Smith Jr.	14	9	2	5-12
Amen Thompson	12	9	6	6-14
Reed Sheppard	12	2	2	5-11
Steven Adams	6	11	3	2-6
Clint Capela	4	5	0	2-3
Jae’Sean Tate	0	0	0	0-0
Josh Okogie	0	1	0	0-2

The official NBA box score confirms these individual statistics. (NBA.com)

Cleveland Cavaliers

Player	PTS	REB	AST	FG
De’Andre Hunter	25	4	2	6-11
Donovan Mitchell	21	3	2	8-17
Evan Mobley	18	6	0	7-13
Nae’Qwan Tomlin	10	2	0	4-10
Craig Porter Jr.	9	7	5	4-6
Jarrett Allen	8	7	3	4-9
Lonzo Ball	7	2	2	2-8
Dean Wade	4	7	3	1-5
Tyrese Proctor	2	1	3	0-1
Thomas Bryant	0	0	0	0-1

The official NBA box score provides the complete player-by-player record for Cleveland. (NBA.com)

Statistical Lessons for Future Matchups

This matchup provides several useful areas to monitor in future games between these teams.

Rebounding remains an important indicator

A 12-rebound advantage is substantial.

Houston’s 16 offensive rebounds show that second chances were a major part of the team’s statistical profile.

Free-throw conversion can swing close games

Cleveland had 32 free-throw attempts but converted only 20.

Houston had 27 attempts and made 23.

The difference was three made free throws despite Cleveland attempting five more.

Three-point volume needs context

Cleveland made more threes, but Houston shot a higher percentage.

That distinction matters.

Three-point totals should therefore be considered alongside attempts and percentage rather than viewed in isolation.

Fourth-quarter scoring changed the outcome

Cleveland’s comeback was real, but Houston’s 40-point fourth quarter stopped it.

The final period demonstrated the value of maintaining offensive efficiency after an opponent makes a major run.

How to Read These Player Stats Correctly

A useful box-score analysis should not simply identify the highest scorer.

Instead, readers should examine at least five areas:

1. Scoring efficiency
2. Rebounding
3. Playmaking
4. Turnovers and defensive events
5. Free-throw and three-point efficiency

For example, Durant scored 20 points but shot 6-of-18.

Sengun scored 28 on 10-of-17 shooting.

Holiday scored 18 on 5-of-7 shooting.

Those three lines describe very different offensive performances despite all being positive scoring contributions.

Similarly, Thompson’s 12 points do not fully describe his impact because he added nine rebounds, six assists and five steals.

This is why looking at multiple categories provides a better understanding of player performance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who led the Rockets in scoring against the Cavaliers?

Alperen Sengun led Houston with 28 points. He also recorded 11 rebounds and seven assists.

Who led the Cavaliers in scoring?

De’Andre Hunter led Cleveland with 25 points. He shot 6-of-11 from the field, made five three-pointers and went 8-of-8 from the free-throw line.

What was the final score between Houston and Cleveland?

Houston defeated Cleveland 114-104.

Who had the most rebounds in the game?

Alperen Sengun and Steven Adams each recorded 11 rebounds for Houston, the highest individual total in the game.

How many three-pointers did Cleveland make?

Cleveland made 12 three-pointers on 39 attempts, shooting 30.8% from beyond the arc.

Why did Houston win the game?

Houston’s statistical advantages included a 51-39 rebounding edge, stronger free-throw shooting, more steals, and a 40-point fourth quarter after Cleveland had mounted a major comeback. (NBA.com)

Conclusion

The cleveland cavaliers vs houston rockets match player stats show a game defined by momentum swings rather than a simple wire-to-wire performance.

Houston established control early, leading 57-40 at halftime. Cleveland responded with a 30-point third quarter and a 23-5 run that brought the game back within reach. The Rockets then answered with 40 points in the fourth quarter.

Sengun’s 28 points, 11 rebounds and seven assists provided the foundation for Houston. Thompson added nine rebounds, six assists and five steals, while Holiday’s 18 points included 14 in the fourth quarter. Durant contributed 20 points despite an inefficient shooting night.

For Cleveland, Hunter led all Cavaliers scorers with 25 points, Mitchell finished with 21 and Mobley added 18. Mitchell’s fourth-quarter scoring helped drive the comeback, but Cleveland could not maintain enough efficiency to complete it.

The team statistics reinforce the individual numbers. Houston outrebounded Cleveland 51-39, collected 16 offensive rebounds, shot 85.2% from the free-throw line and finished with nine steals. Cleveland made more three-pointers but shot only 30.8% from long range.

Overall, the box score shows that Houston’s victory came from several connected advantages: interior scoring, second-chance opportunities, defensive activity, efficient free-throw shooting and timely fourth-quarter offense.

Source: The official NBA box score and game summary provide the underlying player and team statistics used throughout this analysis. NBA official box score