New York Giants vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats
The New York Giants vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats reveal two very different offensive approaches. New York relied heavily on its passing attack, while Washington created significant opportunities through its running game. Winston threw for 326 yards and three touchdowns, while Daniels rushed for 103 yards and scored twice.
One important scheduling detail: although the supplied match information labels this contest Week 8, the published game records identify it as Week 5. This article uses the verified Week 5 designation. The final score, date, player performances, and team records are consistent with the available game records.
Washington Commanders – Commanders.com+2
The result was particularly interesting because neither team managed to establish complete control. The Giants produced more total offensive yards and passing touchdowns, but Washington dominated on the ground. Both teams had opportunities to finish the contest with a victory, yet the game ultimately ended without a winner.
Match Overview and Final Score
The game was competitive from the opening quarter through overtime. Washington started with a stronger scoring rhythm, but New York gradually improved its offensive production and delivered an impressive fourth-quarter comeback.
Score by Quarter
| Quarter | New York Giants | Washington Commanders |
| First Quarter | 3 | 6 |
| Second Quarter | 0 | 6 |
| Third Quarter | 10 | 7 |
| Fourth Quarter | 14 | 8 |
| Overtime | 0 | 0 |
| Final | 27 | 27 |
Washington held a 12-3 advantage at halftime. The Giants responded with 10 points in the third quarter and another 14 in the fourth.
The Commanders scored eight points in the fourth quarter, including a two-point conversion, but could not prevent New York from tying the contest.
Neither team scored during overtime, leaving both sides with a draw.
Team Statistical Comparison
The overall numbers show why this matchup remained competitive.
| Statistical Category | Giants | Commanders |
| Final Score | 27 | 27 |
| Total Offensive Yards | 408 | 378 |
| Passing Yards | 326 | 199 |
| Rushing Yards | 103 | 202 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 3 | 0 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 0 | 3 |
| Pass Completions | 33 | 17 |
| Pass Attempts | 54 | 25 |
| Rushing Attempts | 28 | 30 |
| Sacks Allowed | 2 | 5 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 0 |
| Third-Down Conversions | 8/17 | 4/12 |
| Time of Possession | 39:25 | 30:35 |
| Turnovers Lost | 2 | 0 |
New York finished with 408 total yards, compared with Washington’s 378. However, the Commanders were considerably more productive on the ground.
The Giants gained 305 net passing yards after accounting for sacks, while Washington finished with 176 net passing yards. This difference helped New York control possession for almost nine minutes longer.
Washington compensated for its lower passing production by gaining 202 rushing yards. That was nearly twice the Giants’ 103 rushing yards.
The statistical comparison also highlights an important difference in efficiency. New York converted eight of 17 third-down opportunities, while Washington converted four of 12. The Giants were better at extending drives, but their two lost fumbles prevented them from turning that advantage into a victory.
New York Giants vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats: Quarterback Performances
Quarterback production was one of the most important parts of this contest. Jameis Winston and Jayden Daniels approached the game differently, and their individual numbers reflect those contrasting strategies.
Jameis Winston Passing Stats
Giants passing leader
Jameis Winston delivered an impressive passing performance for New York. He completed 33 of 54 attempts for 326 yards and three touchdowns without throwing an interception.
| Passing Statistic | Jameis Winston |
| Completions | 33 |
| Attempts | 54 |
| Completion Percentage | 61.1% |
| Passing Yards | 326 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 6.0 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 3 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks Taken | 2 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 21 |
| Passer Rating | 96.7 |
Winston’s biggest strength was his ability to keep the Giants’ passing offense productive throughout the game.
His 326 passing yards represented the highest passing total of either team. More importantly, he connected with his receivers for three touchdowns, helping New York recover from a nine-point halftime deficit.
His connection with Malik Nabers was especially important. Nabers caught 11 passes for 121 yards and one touchdown, giving Winston a dependable option throughout the contest.
Isaiah Likely also played a major role. His 11 receptions, 94 receiving yards, and two touchdowns made him an essential part of New York’s scoring attack.
Winston’s performance was not completely without challenges. He attempted 54 passes, meaning the Giants relied heavily on his arm to move the football. Washington also recorded two sacks against him.
Despite the pressure, Winston avoided interceptions. That was an important positive because turnovers can quickly change the direction of a close NFL game.
His performance demonstrated how a quarterback can produce significant passing numbers even when the opposing defense limits the running game.
Jayden Daniels Passing Stats
Commanders rushing leader
Jayden Daniels produced a different type of performance for Washington. His passing numbers were more modest, but his ability to run the football created major problems for the Giants’ defense.
| Passing Statistic | Jayden Daniels |
| Completions | 17 |
| Attempts | 25 |
| Completion Percentage | 68.0% |
| Passing Yards | 199 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 8.0 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks Taken | 5 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 23 |
| Passer Rating | 91.9 |
Daniels completed 68% of his passes and averaged 8.0 yards per attempt.
Although he did not throw a passing touchdown, his contribution to Washington’s offense extended well beyond the passing statistics.
The Giants struggled to contain him when he left the pocket. His running ability created additional opportunities, particularly when Washington needed to maintain offensive momentum.
Daniels also avoided interceptions, which helped Washington protect possession despite facing pressure from New York’s defensive front.
One concern was the five sacks he absorbed. Those negative plays limited the Commanders’ passing efficiency and sometimes placed the offense in difficult situations.
However, his rushing production helped offset those problems.
Winston vs Daniels: Who Had the Better Game?
The answer depends on which part of quarterback performance matters most.
| Category | Jameis Winston | Jayden Daniels |
| Passing Yards | 326 | 199 |
| Completions | 33 | 17 |
| Attempts | 54 | 25 |
| Passing TDs | 3 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Rushing Yards | 27 | 103 |
| Rushing TDs | 0 | 2 |
Winston was clearly the more productive passer. He generated 127 more passing yards and threw three touchdowns.
Daniels, however, provided a more significant rushing threat. His 103 yards on nine carries gave Washington an explosive offensive dimension that New York struggled to control.
Neither quarterback threw an interception.
Winston’s passing production helped the Giants recover, while Daniels’ mobility helped Washington maintain its scoring advantage. Both played important roles in producing the tie.
Running Back and Rushing Player Stats
The rushing comparison was one of the clearest statistical differences between the teams.
Washington gained 202 rushing yards on 30 attempts, averaging 6.7 yards per carry. New York recorded 103 rushing yards on 28 attempts, averaging 3.7 yards per carry.
That difference gave Washington a major advantage in the ground game.
New York Giants Rushing Stats
Cam Skattebo led the Giants in rushing production.
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Average | Touchdowns |
| Cam Skattebo | 13 | 59 | 4.5 | 0 |
| Jameis Winston | 5 | 27 | 5.4 | 0 |
| Najee Harris | 5 | 9 | 1.8 | 0 |
| Tyrone Tracy Jr. | 3 | 6 | 2.0 | 0 |
| J.J. McCarthy | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 |
| Team Total | 28 | 103 | 3.7 | 0 |
Cam Skattebo
Skattebo recorded 13 carries for 59 yards, averaging 4.5 yards per attempt.
His longest run covered 19 yards.
He was New York’s leading traditional rushing option and provided a relatively consistent source of ground production.
However, he did not score a rushing touchdown. His contribution was more about maintaining offensive balance and helping the Giants avoid becoming completely dependent on Winston’s passing.
Skattebo also contributed two receptions for 12 yards. That gave him an additional role in the passing game.
One negative moment came through a lost fumble. In a game decided by small margins, that mistake was particularly costly.
Jameis Winston
Winston added 27 rushing yards on five attempts.
Although his primary responsibility was passing, his rushing production gave the Giants another option when Washington’s defensive coverage limited available receivers.
His average of 5.4 yards per carry was actually higher than Skattebo’s average.
Najee Harris and Tyrone Tracy Jr.
Najee Harris recorded five carries for nine yards, while Tyrone Tracy Jr. gained six yards on three attempts.
Neither player generated significant rushing production.
Tracy did, however, contribute two receptions for 25 yards and returned two kickoffs for 55 yards. His overall contribution was therefore greater than his rushing numbers alone suggest.
Washington Commanders Rushing Stats
Washington’s rushing attack was led by Jayden Daniels and Jacory Croskey-Merritt.
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Average | Touchdowns |
| Jayden Daniels | 9 | 103 | 11.4 | 2 |
| Jacory Croskey-Merritt | 11 | 82 | 7.5 | 1 |
| Rachaad White | 7 | 18 | 2.6 | 0 |
| Austin Ekeler | 3 | -1 | -0.3 | 0 |
| Team Total | 30 | 202 | 6.7 | 3 |
Jayden Daniels
Daniels was Washington’s most dangerous rushing player.
He recorded 103 yards on nine carries, averaging an outstanding 11.4 yards per attempt.
He also scored two rushing touchdowns.
His 38-yard longest run demonstrated how quickly he could turn a normal offensive play into a significant gain.
Daniels’ mobility forced the Giants to account for him as both a passer and a runner. This made defensive assignments more difficult and opened opportunities for other Washington players.
His performance was especially valuable because Washington did not record a passing touchdown.
Jacory Croskey-Merritt
Croskey-Merritt produced another impressive rushing performance.
He finished with 82 yards on 11 carries, averaging 7.5 yards per attempt. He also scored one touchdown on a 33-yard rushing play.
Together, Daniels and Croskey-Merritt produced 185 rushing yards.
That means the two players accounted for the majority of Washington’s total ground production.
Their combined performance was one of the biggest reasons the Commanders remained competitive.
Rachaad White and Austin Ekeler
Rachaad White recorded seven carries for 18 yards.
He did not produce a touchdown, but he contributed to Washington’s running rotation and added four kickoff returns for 100 yards.
Austin Ekeler finished with three carries for minus one yard. He also caught one pass for 15 yards.
Neither player matched the production of Daniels or Croskey-Merritt, but both provided additional options within the offensive system.
Receiving Player Stats: Giants vs Commanders
The receiving statistics show another major difference between the offenses.
New York completed 33 passes for 326 yards and three touchdowns. Washington completed 17 passes for 199 yards without a passing touchdown.
The Giants also distributed their passing production effectively between two primary receiving targets.
New York Giants Receiving Stats
| Player | Receptions | Targets | Receiving Yards | Average | TD |
| Malik Nabers | 11 | 20 | 121 | 11.0 | 1 |
| Isaiah Likely | 11 | 13 | 94 | 8.5 | 2 |
| Theo Johnson | 2 | Not specified | 35 | 17.5 | 0 |
| Tyrone Tracy Jr. | 2 | Not specified | 25 | 12.5 | 0 |
| Malachi Fields | 2 | Not specified | 20 | 10.0 | 0 |
| Darnell Mooney | 2 | Not specified | 14 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Cam Skattebo | 2 | Not specified | 12 | 6.0 | 0 |
| Najee Harris | 1 | Not specified | 5 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Team Total | 33 | 52 | 326 | 9.9 | 3 |
Malik Nabers
Malik Nabers was New York’s leading receiver.
He caught 11 passes for 121 yards and one touchdown on 20 targets.
His average was 11 yards per reception, and his longest reception covered 28 yards.
Nabers was an important part of the Giants’ comeback because he consistently gave Winston a reliable downfield option.
His 20 targets also demonstrate how frequently New York involved him in the passing offense.
The Giants did not simply use him for occasional big plays. They repeatedly looked in his direction to move the chains and create scoring opportunities.
His touchdown in the fourth quarter helped New York complete its comeback and bring the score level at 27-27.
Isaiah Likely
Isaiah Likely delivered one of the most important individual receiving performances of the contest.
He recorded 11 receptions for 94 yards and two touchdowns on 13 targets.
His reception average was 8.5 yards.
While Nabers led the Giants in total receiving yards, Likely was the team’s leading touchdown receiver.
Both of his touchdowns came at important moments, helping New York stay within reach of Washington.
His ability to find openings in the Commanders’ coverage gave Winston an effective option in scoring situations.
The combination of Nabers and Likely was particularly difficult for Washington to manage.
Together, they produced:
- 22 receptions.
- 215 receiving yards.
- Three receiving touchdowns.
- 33 combined targets.
They accounted for all three of Winston’s passing touchdowns.
Supporting Giants Receivers
Theo Johnson contributed 35 receiving yards on two catches, while Tyrone Tracy Jr. added 25 yards.
Malachi Fields recorded 20 yards, and Darnell Mooney added 14.
Skattebo and Harris also contributed short receptions.
These smaller contributions were important because they prevented Washington from focusing entirely on Nabers and Likely.
Washington Commanders Receiving Stats
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Average | Touchdowns |
| Terry McLaurin | 4 | 62 | 15.5 | 0 |
| Chig Okonkwo | 4 | 60 | 15.0 | 0 |
| Antonio Williams | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 0 |
| Treylon Burks | 2 | 26 | 13.0 | 0 |
| Austin Ekeler | 1 | 15 | 15.0 | 0 |
| Dyami Brown | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
| Rachaad White | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
| John Bates | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 |
| Team Total | 17 | 199 | 11.7 | 0 |
Terry McLaurin
Terry McLaurin led Washington in receiving yards.
He caught four passes for 62 yards, averaging 15.5 yards per reception.
His longest reception covered 22 yards.
Although he did not score a receiving touchdown, he provided an important downfield option for Daniels.
McLaurin’s performance was particularly useful because Washington’s passing offense produced fewer completions than New York’s.
He helped maintain an efficient average gain whenever the Commanders used their passing attack.
Chig Okonkwo
Chig Okonkwo matched McLaurin with four receptions but finished with 60 receiving yards.
He averaged 15 yards per catch.
His contribution gave Washington another dependable receiving option and helped prevent the Giants from concentrating all their coverage on McLaurin.
Antonio Williams and Treylon Burks
Antonio Williams recorded three receptions for 31 yards.
Treylon Burks added two receptions for 26 yards.
Both players provided additional receiving depth, although neither scored a touchdown.
The Commanders’ receiving group had a respectable average of 11.7 yards per reception. The challenge was not simply gaining yards. It was converting those opportunities into passing touchdowns.
Receiving Comparison
New York clearly had the advantage in total receiving production.
| Category | Giants | Commanders |
| Receptions | 33 | 17 |
| Receiving Yards | 326 | 199 |
| Yards Per Reception | 9.9 | 11.7 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 3 | 0 |
| Targets | 52 | 23 |
Washington actually averaged more yards per reception.
However, New York completed 16 more passes and produced three receiving touchdowns.
This illustrates why average yards per catch should never be considered in isolation. A team can generate explosive individual plays but still struggle to match an opponent’s total passing production.
Defensive Player Stats and Team Performance
The defensive numbers reveal how both teams approached the matchup.
New York recorded five sacks, while Washington managed two.
However, Washington finished with more total tackles and more passes defended.
Neither defense intercepted a pass.
New York Giants Defensive Stats
| Defensive Statistic | Giants |
| Total Tackles | 70 |
| Solo Tackles | 43 |
| Sacks | 5 |
| Tackles for Loss | 6 |
| Passes Defended | 2 |
| Quarterback Hits | 7 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 0 |
Tremaine Edmunds
Tremaine Edmunds led the Giants with nine total tackles.
He recorded six solo tackles, one sack, one tackle for loss, and one quarterback hit.
His performance was important in limiting Washington’s offensive opportunities.
Edmunds contributed both against the run and as a pass rusher.
His nine tackles demonstrated his involvement throughout the game.
Dru Phillips
Dru Phillips delivered an especially productive defensive performance.
He recorded five tackles, all of them solo, along with two sacks, two tackles for loss, and four quarterback hits.
His pressure on Daniels was a significant part of New York’s defensive effort.
Although Washington gained considerable rushing yardage, Phillips helped the Giants create problems in passing situations.
His two sacks represented a major contribution to the team’s five-sack total.
Arvell Reese
Arvell Reese recorded nine total tackles, three solo tackles, and one sack.
His performance added another important defensive presence for New York.
The Giants needed contributions from several defenders because Daniels and Croskey-Merritt consistently found space on the ground.
Washington Commanders Defensive Stats
| Defensive Statistic | Commanders |
| Total Tackles | 90 |
| Solo Tackles | 51 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Tackles for Loss | 5 |
| Passes Defended | 5 |
| Quarterback Hits | 7 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 0 |
Sonny Styles
Sonny Styles led Washington with 13 total tackles.
He recorded four solo tackles, one tackle for loss, and one pass defended.
His 13 tackles were the highest individual tackle total reported for either team.
Styles was heavily involved in the defensive effort, particularly as New York repeatedly used its passing attack to move the football.
Rasul Douglas
Rasul Douglas finished with 10 tackles, including nine solo tackles.
He also recorded two tackles for loss and one pass defended.
His contribution was important against a Giants receiving unit that completed 33 passes.
Douglas helped Washington compete defensively even when Winston and his receivers found consistent opportunities.
Frankie Luvu
Frankie Luvu recorded nine tackles, six solo tackles, and one quarterback hit.
His involvement helped Washington maintain defensive pressure.
The Commanders needed a strong performance from their defensive unit because New York repeatedly threatened to take the lead through its passing attack.
Defensive Comparison
Washington finished with more tackles, but New York generated more sacks.
The Giants’ five sacks were particularly important because Daniels was able to create substantial rushing production whenever he escaped pressure.
The Commanders, meanwhile, recorded 90 total tackles compared with New York’s 70.
Neither defense intercepted a pass, meaning both quarterbacks were able to avoid one of the most damaging types of turnovers.
The defensive battle was therefore determined more by quarterback pressure, tackling, and the ability to limit scoring opportunities than by interceptions.
Turnovers, Fumbles, and Ball Security
Turnovers were another important factor in the final result.
The Giants lost two fumbles, while Washington did not lose a fumble according to the supplied team statistics.
| Turnover Statistic | Giants | Commanders |
| Fumbles | 2 | 1 |
| Fumbles Lost | 2 | 0 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 0 |
| Total Turnovers Lost | 2 | 0 |
Giants Fumble Problems
Jameis Winston and Cam Skattebo were each credited with one lost fumble in the supplied statistics.
These mistakes were costly because New York had already established a productive passing offense.
Losing possession can eliminate scoring opportunities and give the opposing team additional chances to control the game.
The Giants managed to recover from those problems, but their ball security was one of the weaker parts of their performance.
Commanders Ball Security
Washington recorded one fumble without losing possession.
That was an important difference between the teams.
The Commanders protected the football more effectively, allowing their offense to continue operating without surrendering possession through a lost fumble.
Neither team threw an interception, so fumbles represented the primary turnover difference in this matchup.
Special Teams Player Stats
Special teams played an important supporting role in this contest.
Both teams received useful contributions from their return units, while the kicking statistics revealed an area where New York could have performed better.
Giants Kicking Stats
Dominic Zvada handled the kicking responsibilities for New York.
| Kicking Statistic | Giants |
| Kicker | Dominic Zvada |
| Field Goals Made | 2 |
| Field Goals Attempted | 5 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 40% |
| Longest Field Goal | 56 yards |
| Extra Points Made | 3 |
| Extra Points Attempted | 3 |
| Total Kicking Points | 9 |
Zvada successfully converted two field goals, including a long attempt of 56 yards.
However, missing three field-goal attempts was a significant concern.
In a game that ended in a tie, missed scoring opportunities naturally become an important part of the discussion.
New York converted all three extra-point attempts, which helped the team complete its three touchdown drives.
Commanders Kicking Stats
Drew Stevens handled Washington’s kicking responsibilities.
| Kicking Statistic | Commanders |
| Kicker | Drew Stevens |
| Field Goals Made | 2 |
| Field Goals Attempted | 2 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 100% |
| Longest Field Goal | 40 yards |
| Extra Points Made | 1 |
| Extra Points Attempted | 2 |
| Total Kicking Points | 7 |
Stevens converted both field-goal attempts.
His field-goal accuracy was better than New York’s, although Washington missed one extra-point attempt.
The Commanders also converted a two-point attempt following one of their rushing touchdowns.
That conversion was important in building their 27-point total.
Kick Return Statistics
Kick returns gave both teams opportunities to improve their starting field position.
| Player | Team | Returns | Return Yards | Average | Longest |
| Charlie Jones | Giants | 5 | 130 | 26.0 | 36 |
| Tyrone Tracy Jr. | Giants | 2 | 55 | 27.5 | 32 |
| Rachaad White | Commanders | 4 | 100 | 25.0 | 32 |
| Luke McCaffrey | Commanders | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 23 |
New York finished with 185 kickoff return yards, compared with Washington’s 141.
Charlie Jones led the Giants with 130 return yards.
His five returns provided consistent opportunities for New York to begin offensive possessions with useful field position.
Tracy also contributed 55 return yards, averaging 27.5 yards per attempt.
For Washington, White led the return unit with 100 yards on four attempts.
Luke McCaffrey added 41 yards on two returns.
Punt Return Statistics
The punt return comparison also favored New York.
| Player | Team | Returns | Return Yards | Average | Longest |
| Charlie Jones | Giants | 4 | 52 | 13.0 | 16 |
| Antonio Williams | Commanders | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 2 |
Jones was again a major contributor for the Giants.
His four punt returns produced 52 yards, averaging 13 yards per return.
Antonio Williams recorded one return for two yards for Washington.
Punting Statistics
| Statistic | Jordan Stout | Tress Way |
| Team | Giants | Commanders |
| Punts | 2 | 6 |
| Total Punting Yards | 114 | 312 |
| Average | 57.0 | 52.0 |
| Longest Punt | 59 | 59 |
| Inside the 20 | 2 | 2 |
| Touchbacks | 0 | 0 |
Jordan Stout averaged 57 yards per punt, compared with Tress Way’s 52 yards.
Stout also placed both of his punts inside the 20-yard line.
Way had six punting attempts because Washington had more possessions that ended without a scoring opportunity.
The difference in punt totals also reflects the contrasting offensive approaches. New York maintained longer drives, while Washington frequently alternated between explosive rushing plays and shorter possessions.
How the Giants Built Their Comeback
The Giants entered halftime trailing 12-3.
Their offense had not yet reached the level of production it would show later in the game.
Washington had scored in the opening quarter and added two field goals in the second. New York, meanwhile, managed only one field goal during the first half.
The third quarter changed the direction of the contest.
Third Quarter: New York Finds Its Rhythm
The Giants scored 10 points in the third quarter.
Dominic Zvada converted a 56-yard field goal, giving New York three additional points.
Washington responded with a 38-yard rushing touchdown from Daniels.
However, Winston then connected with Isaiah Likely for a three-yard touchdown pass.
The score moved to 19-13 in Washington’s favor.
That touchdown was important because it showed New York could create scoring opportunities through the passing game even against a defense that had controlled much of the first half.
Fourth Quarter: Both Teams Deliver
Washington extended its advantage when Daniels scored another rushing touchdown.
This time, the Commanders also completed a two-point conversion through a pass from Daniels to Terry McLaurin.
The score became 27-13.
New York needed two touchdowns to tie the game.
Winston responded by connecting with Likely for a 17-yard touchdown.
The Giants then converted the extra point, reducing Washington’s lead to seven.
Later, Winston found Nabers for another touchdown.
Zvada converted the extra point, bringing the score to 27-27.
New York had completed its comeback through two important passing connections.
Overtime: Neither Team Finds the Winning Score
Overtime offered both teams another opportunity to finish the contest.
However, neither offense managed to produce the points needed to secure a victory.
Washington’s defense and New York’s defense both continued to make important stops.
The Giants had already lost two fumbles during the game, and ball security remained a concern.
Washington also struggled to turn its offensive opportunities into a winning score.
The overtime period ended without either team scoring.
The final result was a 27-27 tie.
Five Biggest Takeaways From the Match
The statistical record provides several important lessons about how the game developed.
1. Jameis Winston Was the Better Passing Quarterback
Winston finished with 326 passing yards and three touchdowns.
He completed 33 of 54 passes without an interception.
His connection with Nabers and Likely gave New York the offensive production required to recover from its halftime deficit.
Daniels was productive as a passer, but his 199 passing yards and zero passing touchdowns were not enough to match Winston’s aerial production.
2. Jayden Daniels Controlled the Rushing Battle
Daniels finished with 103 rushing yards and two touchdowns.
His performance was especially impressive because he averaged 11.4 yards per carry.
He was also supported by Croskey-Merritt, who recorded 82 rushing yards and another touchdown.
Together, the two players created 185 rushing yards and three touchdowns.
This was Washington’s biggest statistical advantage.
3. Malik Nabers and Isaiah Likely Were Crucial
New York’s two leading receivers combined for 215 yards and three touchdowns.
Nabers produced 121 yards, while Likely added 94.
Their contributions made the Giants’ passing attack difficult to contain.
Both players were central to the comeback.
4. Washington Was More Efficient on the Ground
The Commanders averaged 6.7 yards per rushing attempt.
The Giants averaged only 3.7.
That difference gave Washington a clear advantage in rushing efficiency.
However, New York’s ability to control possession and generate passing yards helped balance the statistical comparison.
5. Turnovers and Missed Kicks Were Important
New York lost two fumbles and converted only two of five field-goal attempts.
Those missed opportunities were significant.
Although the Giants scored three passing touchdowns, they left potential points on the field.
Washington was more secure with possession and converted both field-goal attempts.
The fact that the game ended tied makes these small details particularly relevant when reviewing the final result.
Why Did the Giants and Commanders Finish in a Tie?
The final result was produced by a combination of offensive strengths and defensive limitations.
New York had a significant advantage in passing production. Winston threw for 326 yards and three touchdowns, and the Giants controlled possession for 39 minutes and 25 seconds.
Washington, however, had a stronger running game.
Daniels and Croskey-Merritt combined for 185 yards and three rushing touchdowns.
The Commanders also avoided losing a fumble, while New York lost two.
Neither team intercepted the opposing quarterback.
Ultimately, both offenses found ways to score 27 points, but neither could produce a winning score during overtime.
The tie reflected the fact that each team had a different statistical advantage without being able to turn that advantage into a decisive result.
What the Player Statistics Reveal About Both Teams
Looking beyond the final score provides a clearer understanding of the performance.
New York Giants: Passing Strength and Rushing Limitations
New York demonstrated that its passing offense could produce consistent yardage and multiple touchdowns.
Winston’s performance was supported by two productive receivers and several additional contributors.
However, the Giants struggled to create the same level of production on the ground.
Their 103 rushing yards were considerably lower than Washington’s total.
The two lost fumbles and three missed field goals also limited their ability to capitalize on offensive opportunities.
The biggest positive was the team’s ability to respond after trailing 12-3 at halftime.
Washington Commanders: Rushing Strength and Passing Limitations
Washington’s biggest offensive strength was its ground game.
Daniels and Croskey-Merritt consistently generated significant gains.
The Commanders also benefited from Daniels’ ability to create opportunities outside traditional passing plays.
However, their passing offense did not produce a touchdown.
The Giants also recorded five sacks, creating pressure that limited Washington’s passing opportunities.
The Commanders’ ability to score 27 points despite having no passing touchdowns demonstrates how important their running attack was.
The Importance of Balanced Offensive Production
This matchup demonstrates why successful NFL offenses need more than one effective way to move the football.
New York relied on Winston’s arm and its receiving group.
Washington relied on Daniels’ mobility and a productive running game.
Both approaches generated 27 points.
However, neither team managed to establish a decisive advantage across all areas of the game.
The most effective takeaway is that offensive yardage, possession time, rushing efficiency, and turnovers must be considered together when evaluating a team’s performance.
Official Match Information and Statistical Reference
Readers who want to examine the original player-by-player numbers can consult the official Washington Commanders game box score.
The game record includes the final score, individual passing performances, rushing production, receiving statistics, defensive contributions, and team comparisons.
For readers researching the New York Giants vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats, checking the original box score is useful when comparing individual performances or reviewing specific statistical categories.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What was the final score of the New York Giants vs Washington Commanders game?
The New York Giants and Washington Commanders finished in a 27-27 tie on October 11, 2026. Neither team scored during overtime.
2. How many passing yards did Jameis Winston record?
Jameis Winston completed 33 of 54 passes for 326 yards and three touchdowns. He did not throw an interception.
3. How many rushing yards did Jayden Daniels have?
Jayden Daniels recorded 103 rushing yards on nine carries, averaging 11.4 yards per attempt. He also scored two rushing touchdowns.
4. Who was the leading receiver for the New York Giants?
Malik Nabers led New York with 11 receptions for 121 yards and one touchdown. Isaiah Likely also recorded 11 receptions, finishing with 94 yards and two touchdowns.
5. Which team had more rushing yards?
The Washington Commanders dominated the rushing comparison with 202 yards on 30 attempts. The Giants recorded 103 yards on 28 attempts.
6. How many touchdowns did each team score?
Both teams scored three touchdowns. New York recorded all three through passing plays, while Washington scored all three through rushing plays.
Conclusion
The October 11, 2026 matchup between the New York Giants and Washington Commanders was a competitive contest that ended in a 27-27 overtime tie.
The Giants delivered an impressive passing performance through Jameis Winston, who completed 33 passes for 326 yards and three touchdowns. Malik Nabers and Isaiah Likely were the leading receiving contributors, combining for 215 yards and all three of New York’s passing touchdowns.
Washington found its greatest success through its rushing attack. Jayden Daniels recorded 103 rushing yards and two touchdowns, while Jacory Croskey-Merritt added 82 yards and another touchdown. Their combined production helped the Commanders finish with 202 rushing yards.
Defensively, New York recorded five sacks, while Washington finished with 90 total tackles. Neither team managed to intercept the opposing quarterback.
The Giants had more passing yards, more total offensive yards, and a longer time of possession. Washington had a significant advantage in rushing production and ball security.
Ultimately, neither team could establish enough control to secure a victory. The final 27-27 result reflected two different offensive approaches, several important individual performances, and missed opportunities on both sides.
The New York Giants vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats provide a detailed picture of how Winston’s passing production and Daniels’ rushing ability shaped one of the most closely contested games of the season.
