Cincinnati Bengals vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats

The Cincinnati Bengals vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats provide an important look at a matchup between two teams entering November 24, 2026, with very different levels of momentum. The Bengals arrive at Northwest Stadium with a 2-2 record, while the Commanders enter at 1-3. Cincinnati has also received the stronger pregame projection, with ESPN’s matchup predictor giving the Bengals a 63.8% chance of winning compared with 36.0% for Washington. Those numbers matter, but the deeper story is in the player production, injuries, recent results, and the individual battles that could decide the game.

The matchup is scheduled for 6:15 AM at Northwest Stadium in Landover, Maryland, with ESPN carrying the game. Cincinnati’s offense has been led by Joe Burrow through the opening portion of the season, while Chase Brown has provided the team’s leading rushing production and Tee Higgins has been the leading receiver. Washington has relied on a more complicated quarterback situation, with Jayden Daniels inactive and Marcus Mariota listed as doubtful with a knee injury.

That makes the individual statistics especially important. When a starting quarterback is unavailable or limited, the value of rushing efficiency, pass protection, receiver separation, defensive pressure, and field position rises quickly. This is why a simple comparison of team records does not tell the whole story.

Cincinnati Bengals vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats: Key Numbers

Before looking at individual players, the most useful way to understand this game is to establish the statistical baseline.

Category	Cincinnati Bengals	Washington Commanders
Record	2-2	1-3
Home/Away Record	1-1 Away	1-1 Home
Points For	97	88
Points Against	85	122
Leading Passer	Joe Burrow	Marcus Mariota
Passing Yards	1,171	340
Leading Rusher	Chase Brown	Jacory Croskey-Merritt
Rushing Yards	207	157
Leading Receiver	Tee Higgins	Stefon Diggs
Receiving Yards	401	170
Leading Sack Player	Dexter Lawrence II	Odafe Oweh
Leading Tackler	Demetrius Knight Jr.	Jeremy Reaves
ESPN Matchup Predictor	63.8%	36.0%
NFL Pick’em	81%	19%

One statistic immediately stands out: Cincinnati has scored 97 points and allowed 85, giving the Bengals a positive point differential of 12.

Washington, meanwhile, has scored 88 points while allowing 122. That produces a negative differential of 34.

The difference does not guarantee a Bengals victory, but it explains why Cincinnati enters the matchup with a statistical advantage.

Joe Burrow Leads the Bengals Passing Attack

Joe Burrow has been the most important offensive player in Cincinnati’s statistical profile.

Through the supplied season data, Burrow has completed 112 of 157 passes for 1,171 yards, seven touchdowns, and three interceptions.

That works out to a completion rate of approximately 71.3%.

His passing volume is also significant. Burrow has attempted 157 passes in four games, meaning Cincinnati has been comfortable allowing its quarterback to drive the offense through the air.

The numbers suggest three important things.

First, Burrow has been efficient with his opportunities. Completing more than 70% of his attempts gives Cincinnati a strong foundation for sustaining drives.

Second, the seven touchdowns against three interceptions show that the Bengals have generated scoring opportunities without an excessive number of giveaways.

Third, his 1,171 passing yards give Cincinnati an obvious advantage in offensive experience heading into a game where Washington may be forced to adjust its quarterback plan.

The quarterback matchup is particularly important because Washington’s listed passing leader, Marcus Mariota, has only 340 passing yards in the supplied statistics.

Mariota’s season line is 33 completions on 51 attempts with four touchdowns. That is a completion rate of roughly 64.7%.

However, his availability is uncertain. He is listed as doubtful with a knee MCL injury, while Jayden Daniels is inactive because of an elbow issue.

That creates one of the biggest questions surrounding the game.

Washington’s Quarterback Situation Changes the Matchup

Quarterback availability can completely change how player statistics should be interpreted.

Washington’s normal offensive structure becomes harder to evaluate when Jayden Daniels is inactive and Marcus Mariota is doubtful.

Daniels being unavailable is particularly important because a mobile quarterback can influence a defense before a play even begins. Defensive coordinators must account for quarterback movement, designed runs, scrambling lanes, and extended plays.

If Mariota cannot play, Washington would have to rely on its available quarterback options and potentially simplify the offense.

That could influence several areas:

• Passing depth could become more conservative.
• Washington may rely more heavily on its running game.
• Short passes could become more important.
• Cincinnati could commit additional defenders to stopping the run.
• Third-down conversions could become more difficult.
• Defensive pressure could become more valuable for the Bengals.

This is why the Cincinnati Bengals vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats should not be viewed only as a comparison between season totals. Player availability can change the expected role of almost everyone on the field.

Chase Brown Provides Cincinnati With a Strong Running Option

Chase Brown leads the Bengals in rushing production with 207 yards on 58 carries and one touchdown.

His average is approximately 3.6 yards per carry.

That average does not look spectacular on its own, but Brown’s workload is meaningful. Fifty-eight carries indicate that Cincinnati has trusted him with a substantial portion of its rushing responsibility.

His role could become even more important against Washington if the Bengals want to control the game rather than depend entirely on Burrow.

A productive running game would help Cincinnati in several ways.

Keeping Burrow Out of Constant Passing Situations

If Cincinnati can consistently gain positive yardage on early downs, Burrow will have more manageable passing situations.

That can make play-action passing more effective and reduce the number of obvious passing downs.

Controlling Possession

A balanced offense can also help Cincinnati limit Washington’s opportunities.

This is especially relevant because Washington has allowed 122 points across four games. If the Bengals can sustain long possessions, the Commanders’ offense could have fewer chances to generate momentum.

Testing Washington’s Front

Brown’s rushing workload will also provide information about Washington’s defensive discipline.

If the Commanders consistently stop the run early, Cincinnati may shift toward a more pass-heavy approach.

If Brown starts producing efficient gains, Washington could be forced to bring additional defenders toward the line of scrimmage, creating more space for Burrow’s receivers.

Jacory Croskey-Merritt Is Washington’s Leading Rusher

Washington’s leading rusher is Jacory Croskey-Merritt, who has recorded 157 yards on 56 carries with one touchdown.

That is approximately 2.8 yards per carry.

The difference between Croskey-Merritt’s average and Brown’s average is not enormous, but Cincinnati has the more productive rushing profile based on the supplied numbers.

Washington’s rushing attack may therefore have to work harder to stay ahead of the chains.

If the Commanders are without Daniels and potentially without Mariota, the rushing game becomes even more important.

A successful rushing attack could help Washington protect its quarterback situation and prevent Cincinnati’s defense from attacking predictable passing situations.

For that reason, Croskey-Merritt’s workload may be one of the most important individual statistics to watch.

Tee Higgins Has Been Cincinnati’s Leading Receiver

Tee Higgins leads Cincinnati’s receiving group with 401 yards on 25 receptions and one touchdown.

His average gain per reception is 16.0 yards.

That is a substantial number because it shows that Higgins has not simply been used as a short-area possession receiver. His production indicates that Cincinnati has been able to generate meaningful yardage through him.

However, Higgins is listed as questionable because of a groin injury.

That injury could have a major impact on the Bengals’ offensive approach.

If Higgins plays at full strength, Washington has to account for one of Cincinnati’s most productive receiving options.

If he is limited, Cincinnati could need other players to absorb additional targets.

The situation also affects defensive planning. Washington can potentially devote more attention to other Cincinnati receivers if Higgins is unavailable or restricted.

Stefon Diggs Gives Washington a Proven Receiving Option

Stefon Diggs leads Washington in receiving with 170 yards on 18 receptions and three touchdowns.

His average is approximately 9.4 yards per reception.

The touchdown total is particularly notable.

While his yardage is considerably lower than Higgins’ total, Diggs has produced three receiving touchdowns compared with Higgins’ one.

That makes red-zone usage a key part of the comparison.

Washington needs to turn limited offensive opportunities into points. Diggs can become especially important when the field gets shorter and the Commanders need a reliable target.

His performance could become even more important if Washington has to operate with a backup quarterback or a limited passer.

Ja’Marr Chase Injury Status Adds Another Layer

Ja’Marr Chase is listed as questionable with a concussion.

That is one of the most significant injury developments on Cincinnati’s side.

Even without relying on an exact season receiving total from the supplied data, Chase’s presence changes how opposing defenses can approach the Bengals.

Defenses cannot comfortably focus all coverage attention on one receiver when Cincinnati has multiple dangerous options.

• If Chase and Higgins are both available, Cincinnati can create difficult coverage decisions.
• If one is unavailable, Washington can potentially simplify its defensive priorities.
• If both are limited, the Bengals could need more production from their running game and secondary receiving options.

This is why injury reports are not just a footnote when studying player statistics. They directly affect how those statistics are likely to translate into game performance.

Cincinnati’s Defensive Leaders

The Bengals’ defensive statistical leaders also deserve attention.

Demetrius Knight Jr. leads the team with 34 tackles.

That production indicates a significant involvement in the defensive structure. Tackles alone do not measure defensive quality, but a high tackle total can reveal which players are consistently around the football.

Dexter Lawrence II leads the Bengals in sacks with three.

His pass-rushing production is especially relevant against a Washington offense facing uncertainty at quarterback.

Quarterback pressure becomes more valuable when an offense is unable to establish a comfortable passing rhythm.

Cincinnati does not necessarily need to generate a huge sack total to influence the game. Consistent pressure can be enough to force hurried throws, disrupt timing, and create unfavorable down-and-distance situations.

Washington’s Defensive Leaders

Washington’s leading tackler is Jeremy Reaves with 29 tackles.

The Commanders’ sack leader is Odafe Oweh with two sacks.

Those numbers show that Washington has individual defensive contributors, but the team’s overall defensive results remain a concern.

Allowing 122 points in four games means Washington has surrendered an average of 30.5 points per game.

That is a major challenge against an offense led by Burrow.

The Commanders need their defensive players to create negative plays without giving Cincinnati easy opportunities.

Pressure on Burrow is one potential solution.

If Washington can force Burrow into longer third-down situations, the defense can increase the chances of getting off the field.

Cincinnati Bengals vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats and the Injury Report

The injury report could have more influence on this matchup than almost any individual season statistic.

Bengals Injuries

Cincinnati’s listed injuries include:

• Tee Higgins: Questionable, groin
• Ja’Marr Chase: Questionable, concussion
• Swayze Bozeman: Inactive, groin
• B.J. Hill: Inactive, Achilles
• Bryan Cook: Inactive, ankle

The absence of B.J. Hill could matter in the defensive front, while Bryan Cook’s absence affects the secondary.

The Higgins and Chase situations are even more significant for the offense because they involve two major receiving threats.

Commanders Injuries

Washington’s listed injuries include:

• Jayden Daniels: Inactive, elbow
• Terry McLaurin: Inactive, hamstring
• Marcus Mariota: Doubtful, knee MCL
• Tyler Owens: Questionable, hamstring
• Jaylin Lane: Doubtful, ankle

Washington is therefore dealing with significant uncertainty at both quarterback and wide receiver.

Daniels is inactive, McLaurin is inactive, and Mariota is doubtful.

That combination could force Washington to depend more heavily on its remaining offensive players.

Recent Bengals Form

Cincinnati’s last five listed results are:

Opponent	Result
Jacksonville Jaguars	Loss, 22-17
Pittsburgh Steelers	Loss, 30-27
Houston Texans	Win, 20-6
Tampa Bay Buccaneers	Win, 33-27
Philadelphia Eagles	Win, 30-13

The Bengals have therefore won three of their last five listed games.

Their recent results show that Cincinnati has demonstrated the ability to score in different ways.

The 30-13 win over Philadelphia stands out because of the 17-point margin.

The 33-27 result against Tampa Bay also shows Cincinnati’s ability to participate in a higher-scoring game.

The two losses were much closer. Cincinnati lost 30-27 to Pittsburgh and 22-17 to Jacksonville.

That suggests the Bengals have generally remained competitive even when they have not won.

Recent Commanders Form

Washington’s last five listed results are:

Opponent	Result
Indianapolis Colts	Loss, 30-13
Seattle Seahawks	Win, 33-31
Dallas Cowboys	Loss, 37-20
Philadelphia Eagles	Loss, 24-22
Baltimore Ravens	Loss, 41-3

Washington has won only one of those five games.

The 33-31 victory over Seattle shows that the Commanders can produce enough offense to win a close game.

However, the 41-3 loss to Baltimore is particularly concerning.

The Commanders also surrendered 37 points to Dallas and 30 to Indianapolis.

That defensive inconsistency is one of the clearest statistical differences between the teams.

Bengals vs Commanders Offensive Comparison

The offensive comparison strongly favors Cincinnati based on the supplied season data.

Passing

Cincinnati’s Joe Burrow:

• 1,171 passing yards
• 112 completions
• 157 attempts
• 7 touchdowns
• 3 interceptions

Washington’s Marcus Mariota:

• 340 passing yards
• 33 completions
• 51 attempts
• 4 touchdowns
• 0 interceptions

Burrow has significantly more volume and yardage.

Mariota has fewer attempts but has not thrown an interception in the supplied numbers.

The issue is that Mariota’s availability is doubtful, while Daniels is inactive.

Rushing

Cincinnati:

• Chase Brown: 207 yards
• 58 carries
• 1 touchdown

Washington:

• Jacory Croskey-Merritt: 157 yards
• 56 carries
• 1 touchdown

The Bengals have the higher rushing total from their leading rusher.

Receiving

Cincinnati:

• Tee Higgins: 401 yards
• 25 receptions
• 1 touchdown

Washington:

• Stefon Diggs: 170 yards
• 18 receptions
• 3 touchdowns

Higgins has the greater yardage output, while Diggs has more receiving touchdowns.

This creates an interesting contrast between volume and scoring efficiency.

Bengals vs Commanders Defensive Comparison

The defensive comparison is less straightforward.

Cincinnati’s leaders:

• Demetrius Knight Jr.: 34 tackles
• Dexter Lawrence II: 3 sacks

Washington’s leaders:

• Jeremy Reaves: 29 tackles
• Odafe Oweh: 2 sacks

Cincinnati has a slight edge in both listed tackle and sack leadership.

However, the larger difference comes from team scoring defense.

The Bengals have allowed 85 points.

The Commanders have allowed 122.

That 37-point difference across four games is significant.

It means Washington’s defense has surrendered considerably more scoring production.

The Most Important Matchup: Bengals Passing Game vs Washington Defense

The central tactical question is whether Washington can slow down Burrow without committing too many resources to the passing game.

If Washington brings extra pressure, Burrow could have opportunities to attack one-on-one coverage.

If Washington plays conservative coverage, Cincinnati may have opportunities to sustain drives underneath.

The Commanders therefore need a balanced defensive plan.

They must create pressure while maintaining enough coverage discipline to prevent explosive plays.

This is especially important if Higgins and Chase are available.

The Other Critical Matchup: Washington’s Offense vs Cincinnati Pressure

Washington faces the opposite challenge.

With Daniels inactive and Mariota doubtful, Cincinnati can potentially use defensive pressure to make Washington’s quarterback situation even more difficult.

The Commanders need to establish some offensive rhythm early.

That could mean relying on the running game, short throws, quick decisions, and efficient early-down execution.

If Washington falls behind early, the pressure on its quarterback situation increases.

What the Records Actually Tell Us

The Bengals enter at 2-2.

The Commanders enter at 1-3.

But the records alone understate the difference in scoring performance.

Cincinnati:

• 97 points scored
• 85 points allowed
• +12 point differential

Washington:

• 88 points scored
• 122 points allowed
• -34 point differential

The Bengals therefore have a 46-point advantage in point differential.

That is one of the strongest statistical reasons to understand why Cincinnati is favored.

ESPN Matchup Predictor and NFL Pick’em

The supplied ESPN matchup predictor gives Cincinnati a 63.8% win probability and Washington 36.0%.

NFL Pick’em is even more favorable toward Cincinnati, with 81% selecting the Bengals compared with 19% for Washington.

These projections should not be treated as guarantees.

They are useful because they summarize a broader statistical expectation.

The player statistics explain why the projections lean toward Cincinnati.

Burrow has produced significantly more passing volume, Cincinnati has a better overall point differential, and Washington is dealing with more serious offensive availability concerns.

What Could Give Washington an Advantage?

Despite the statistical gap, Washington has paths to a competitive game.

The first is turnover control.

Mariota’s supplied season numbers include zero interceptions. If Washington can protect the football, it can avoid giving Cincinnati short fields.

The second is the running game.

Croskey-Merritt needs to create enough positive yardage to prevent Washington from becoming one-dimensional.

The third is red-zone execution.

Diggs has three receiving touchdowns in the supplied statistics. Washington should look for ways to maximize his opportunities near the goal line.

The fourth is defensive pressure.

Oweh and the rest of Washington’s pass rush need to make Burrow uncomfortable without sacrificing coverage integrity.

What Could Give Cincinnati an Advantage?

Cincinnati has several obvious advantages.

Quarterback Stability

Burrow has 1,171 passing yards and seven touchdowns in the supplied data.

Better Point Differential

The Bengals are +12 compared with Washington’s -34.

Stronger Recent Record

Cincinnati has won three of its last five listed games.

Receiving Production

Higgins has 401 receiving yards.

Defensive Pressure

Lawrence leads the Bengals with three sacks.

Washington’s Injuries

The Commanders are without Daniels and McLaurin, while Mariota is doubtful.

Taken together, these factors explain why Cincinnati enters as the statistical favorite.

How to Read the Player Statistics Correctly

One mistake readers often make with matchup statistics is treating every number as equally predictive.

They are not.

Passing yards, rushing yards, receptions, sacks, and tackles all tell different parts of the story.

For example, a receiver can have fewer total yards but more touchdowns. A running back can have a large workload without producing a high yards-per-carry average. A defender can have many tackles because opponents consistently run plays toward his area, but that does not automatically mean he has been the team’s most effective defender.

The best analysis connects individual numbers with game context.

That is particularly important for this matchup because injuries are likely to affect player roles.

What to Watch During the Game

For readers following the matchup live, several statistical indicators can quickly reveal which team is controlling the game.

1. Burrow’s Completion Rate

If Burrow remains highly efficient early, Cincinnati should have a strong chance to sustain drives.

2. Chase Brown’s Early Carries

If Brown receives consistent opportunities and produces positive gains, Washington’s defense could become more vulnerable to play-action.

3. Washington’s Quarterback Efficiency

Washington needs efficient passing production to remain competitive.

4. Diggs’ Target Volume

With McLaurin inactive, Diggs could become even more important.

5. Cincinnati’s Pressure Rate

If Lawrence and the Bengals’ front create consistent pressure, Washington could struggle to generate sustained offense.

6. Turnovers

Turnovers can erase large statistical advantages quickly. Cincinnati may be favored, but a major turnover differential could dramatically change the game.

Cincinnati Bengals vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats: Statistical Outlook

Based on the supplied information, Cincinnati has the stronger overall statistical profile.

The Bengals have the better record, better point differential, more productive passing numbers, and a stronger recent run of results.

Burrow is the most established statistical centerpiece of the matchup.

Chase Brown gives Cincinnati a dependable rushing option, while Higgins has produced 401 receiving yards.

The Bengals also have defensive contributors in Lawrence and Knight Jr.

Washington’s best statistical arguments come from individual scoring efficiency and the potential for its defense to disrupt Cincinnati.

Diggs has three touchdown receptions, while Croskey-Merritt has handled a significant rushing workload.

The bigger concern is availability.

Daniels is inactive, McLaurin is inactive, and Mariota is doubtful.

Those absences make Washington’s offensive ceiling difficult to project.

A Practical Player Stat Checklist

For anyone analyzing this matchup beyond the final score, the following checklist provides a useful framework:

Quarterback

• Passing yards
• Completion percentage
• Touchdowns
• Interceptions
• Third-down passing

Running backs

• Carries
• Rushing yards
• Yards per carry
• Red-zone carries
• Explosive runs

Receivers

• Targets
• Receptions
• Receiving yards
• Touchdowns
• Yards after catch

Defense

• Sacks
• Quarterback pressures
• Tackles
• Tackles for loss
• Forced turnovers

Team level

• Total yards
• Time of possession
• Third-down conversion
• Red-zone efficiency
• Turnover margin
• Points scored

This approach provides much more context than simply looking at the final score.

Ticket Price and Game Information

The supplied ticket information lists prices as low as $92.

The game is scheduled at Northwest Stadium in Landover, Maryland, with ESPN listed as the broadcast network.

The scheduled date is November 24, 2026.

Because ticket availability and prices can change, the listed $92 figure should be treated as the supplied starting price rather than a guaranteed final price.

Source and Data Context

The statistics and matchup information used in this article are based on the supplied ESPN data for the matchup.

For readers who want to review the underlying matchup information, the relevant ESPN matchup data is the appropriate primary sports reference.

The article intentionally separates confirmed supplied statistics from interpretation. This is important because player projections can change when official inactive lists, injury designations, and final lineups are confirmed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the Bengals’ leading passer?

Joe Burrow is Cincinnati’s leading passer in the supplied season data, with 1,171 passing yards, 112 completions on 157 attempts, seven touchdowns, and three interceptions.

Who is the Commanders’ leading rusher?

Jacory Croskey-Merritt leads Washington in rushing with 157 yards on 56 carries and one touchdown.

Who is Cincinnati’s leading receiver?

Tee Higgins leads the Bengals with 401 receiving yards on 25 receptions and one touchdown.

Who is Washington’s leading receiver?

Stefon Diggs leads Washington with 170 receiving yards on 18 receptions and three touchdowns.

Which team is favored?

The supplied ESPN matchup predictor gives Cincinnati a 63.8% win probability, compared with 36.0% for Washington. NFL Pick’em lists the Bengals at 81% and the Commanders at 19%.

What are the biggest injury concerns?

For Cincinnati, Tee Higgins and Ja’Marr Chase are listed as questionable, while Swayze Bozeman, B.J. Hill, and Bryan Cook are inactive. For Washington, Jayden Daniels and Terry McLaurin are inactive, while Marcus Mariota is doubtful.

Conclusion

The Cincinnati Bengals vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats point toward a matchup in which Cincinnati enters with the stronger statistical foundation.

Joe Burrow’s 1,171 passing yards provide the clearest individual advantage. Chase Brown has supplied 207 rushing yards, while Tee Higgins has produced 401 receiving yards. On defense, Demetrius Knight Jr. leads the Bengals in tackles and Dexter Lawrence II leads the team in sacks.

Washington has meaningful individual contributors of its own. Jacory Croskey-Merritt has rushed for 157 yards, while Stefon Diggs has recorded 170 receiving yards and three touchdowns. Jeremy Reaves leads the team in tackles and Odafe Oweh has two sacks.

The largest concern for Washington is not simply the 1-3 record. It is the combination of a negative 34-point differential and major offensive availability issues. Jayden Daniels and Terry McLaurin are inactive, while Marcus Mariota is doubtful.

Cincinnati’s +12 point differential, stronger passing production, and 3-2 record across its last five listed games give the Bengals a statistical advantage entering the matchup.

Still, player statistics are most useful when viewed in context. Injuries, quarterback availability, turnovers, rushing efficiency, and defensive pressure can all reshape the expected outcome once the game begins.