Denver Nuggets vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats
The denver nuggets vs san antonio spurs match player stats from April 4, 2026, tell the story of one of the most dramatic games of the 2025-26 NBA season. The Denver Nuggets defeated the San Antonio Spurs 136-134 in overtime at Ball Arena, overcoming a double-digit fourth-quarter deficit and ending San Antonio’s 11-game winning streak. Nikola Jokic led Denver with 40 points, 13 assists, and 8 rebounds, while Victor Wembanyama delivered 34 points, 18 rebounds, 7 assists, and 5 blocks for San Antonio.
The result was more than another regular-season win. It showed how two elite teams can reach the same high level through very different styles. San Antonio generated a strong interior attack, controlled the glass, and received a huge two-way performance from Wembanyama. Denver answered with superior three-point shooting, fewer turnovers, elite playmaking from Jokic, and a late-game offensive surge.
One important date clarification is necessary. The official NBA game record identifies this contest as April 4, 2026, rather than April 5. The game was played at Ball Arena in Denver with an announced attendance of 20,039.
Denver Nuggets vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats
| Category | San Antonio Spurs | Denver Nuggets |
| Final Score | 134 | 136 |
| Q1 | 43 | 36 |
| Q2 | 29 | 29 |
| Q3 | 24 | 27 |
| Q4 | 28 | 32 |
| Overtime | 10 | 12 |
| Field Goals | 47-101 | 49-101 |
| Field Goal % | 47% | 49% |
| Three-Pointers | 15-45 | 19-46 |
| Three-Point % | 33% | 41% |
| Free Throws | 25-27 | 19-22 |
| Free Throw % | 93% | 86% |
| Rebounds | 50 | 44 |
| Assists | 29 | 34 |
| Turnovers | 10 | 6 |
| Steals | 5 | 5 |
| Blocks | 6 | 6 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 12 | 8 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 38 | 36 |
| Fouls | 22 | 22 |
The overall numbers explain why this game remained close despite Denver’s comeback. San Antonio shot slightly worse from the field, but its 50-44 rebounding advantage and 25-27 free-throw shooting helped keep the Spurs in control for long stretches.
Denver’s biggest statistical advantages were three-point efficiency, ball security, and playmaking. The Nuggets made 19 of 46 attempts from deep, compared with 15 of 45 for San Antonio. Denver also committed only six turnovers, four fewer than the Spurs.
That combination proved decisive in an overtime game where every possession carried significant value.
Game Summary and Turning Points
San Antonio came out aggressively and scored 43 points in the opening quarter. Denver answered with 36, but the early advantage belonged clearly to the Spurs.
The second quarter was even at 29-29, leaving San Antonio ahead 72-65 at halftime. The Spurs had already established the kind of offensive rhythm that allowed them to attack Denver before the Nuggets could fully settle into their defensive structure.
San Antonio continued to hold the advantage in the third quarter, although Denver began to chip away. The Nuggets scored 27 points while limiting the Spurs to 24, cutting the deficit to four points entering the fourth.
The fourth quarter became the defining period.
San Antonio eventually pushed its lead into double digits. According to the NBA recap, Wembanyama’s basket with 9:08 remaining put the Spurs ahead 107-96. San Antonio had entered the game 48-2 in contests where it held a double-digit lead in the fourth quarter. Denver became only the third team to beat the Spurs in such a situation during the season.
Denver then produced the comeback that changed the entire game.
Jamal Murray helped ignite a 10-2 Denver run with two three-pointers, giving the Nuggets their first lead since the opening quarter. Cameron Johnson followed with major late-game shot-making, including a four-point play that brought Denver within two.
Aaron Gordon then became crucial.
With 6.2 seconds remaining in regulation, Gordon scored to tie the game. He also defended Wembanyama on the final possession and helped force a miss, sending the contest into overtime.
Denver scored 12 points in overtime compared with 10 for San Antonio. Jokic contributed seven of Denver’s 12 overtime points, while the Nuggets maintained enough control to secure the 136-134 victory.
The official NBA game book confirms the final sequence and Denver’s two-point overtime victory.
Nikola Jokic’s 40-Point Masterclass
Nikola Jokic was the central figure in the Denver victory.
He finished with:
- 40 points
- 13 assists
- 8 rebounds
- 13-of-25 field goals
- 1-of-5 three-pointers
- 13-of-15 free throws
- 0 turnovers
- 3 blocks
- 4 personal fouls
His 40-point scoring output was important, but the 13 assists and zero turnovers arguably tell an even more impressive story.
Jokic was not simply operating as Denver’s primary scorer. He was also controlling the game as its main offensive decision-maker. His passing forced San Antonio to make repeated defensive choices, while his scoring efficiency prevented the Spurs from simply focusing on his playmaking.
The official Nuggets recap noted that Jokic became the first center in NBA history to produce at least 40 points and 10 assists without a turnover in a game.
His free-throw shooting was another major factor. Jokic converted 13 of 15 attempts, allowing him to turn aggressive offensive possessions into reliable points.
Most importantly, he remained effective when the game became most difficult.
Jokic scored 16 points during the final 14 minutes of the game, including overtime. During that same stretch, Denver’s defense limited Wembanyama to 1-of-4 shooting.
That is the clearest statistical explanation for Denver’s comeback.
Victor Wembanyama’s Dominant Two-Way Performance
Victor Wembanyama produced an outstanding performance even though San Antonio lost.
His final line included:
- 34 points
- 18 rebounds
- 7 assists
- 5 blocks
- 8-of-17 field goals
- 2-of-6 three-pointers
- 16-of-17 free throws
- 1 steal
Wembanyama’s 18 rebounds were the highest total for either team. He also contributed five blocks, demonstrating how much defensive influence he had around the basket.
His 16-of-17 free-throw shooting was particularly important because Denver had difficulty keeping him away from the foul line.
Wembanyama’s scoring also came in different forms. He was effective inside, comfortable enough to stretch the floor, and capable of creating passing opportunities when Denver sent additional defensive attention toward him.
The matchup with Jokic was therefore not simply a battle between two high scorers.
It was a contrast between Jokic’s offensive control and Wembanyama’s combination of scoring, rebounding, playmaking, and rim protection.
Wembanyama ultimately posted the bigger rebounding and shot-blocking numbers, but Jokic had the greater impact on the final result.
San Antonio Spurs Player Stats
San Antonio received meaningful contributions from several players beyond Wembanyama.
Stephon Castle
Stephon Castle recorded:
- 20 points
- 5 rebounds
- 9 assists
- 9-of-17 shooting
- 2-of-2 free throws
- 4 turnovers
- 6 fouls
Castle’s nine assists were the most on the Spurs. His ability to create offense helped San Antonio maintain its early advantage.
He was also efficient from the field, converting 52.9 percent of his attempts.
The downside was his four turnovers and six fouls. Against a team as efficient as Denver, those small possessions can become costly.
Devin Vassell
Devin Vassell finished with:
- 18 points
- 5 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 6-of-14 shooting
- 3-of-8 from three
- 3-of-3 free throws
His three three-pointers helped San Antonio maintain spacing around Wembanyama.
Vassell was not dominant, but his 18 points gave the Spurs another perimeter scoring option.
Julian Champagnie
Julian Champagnie also scored 18 points.
His line included:
- 18 points
- 5 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 6-of-12 shooting
- 6-of-9 from three
The six made three-pointers were particularly important.
Champagnie shot 66.7 percent from beyond the arc, making him one of San Antonio’s most efficient offensive players in the game.
De’Aaron Fox
De’Aaron Fox contributed:
- 14 points
- 4 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 7-of-19 shooting
- 1 steal
His scoring efficiency was less impressive than that of several other Spurs players. He made only 36.8 percent of his field-goal attempts and missed all six of his three-point attempts.
Still, his presence gave San Antonio another ball-handler and helped the Spurs maintain offensive balance.
Dylan Harper
Dylan Harper added 12 points, 3 rebounds, and 3 assists.
He shot 5-of-7 from the field and 2-of-3 from three-point range, making him one of San Antonio’s more efficient scorers.
His final three-pointer came at the end of overtime, but it was not enough to erase Denver’s two-point advantage.
Denver Nuggets Player Stats
Denver’s victory was not solely dependent on Jokic.
Several supporting players made important contributions at different stages of the game.
Christian Braun
Christian Braun scored 21 points, making him Denver’s second-highest scorer.
He added:
- 8 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 7-of-16 field goals
- 5-of-11 three-pointers
- 2-of-2 free throws
His five made three-pointers were particularly valuable.
Braun gave Denver an efficient perimeter scoring option and helped punish San Antonio when the Spurs concentrated defensive attention on Jokic.
His eight rebounds were also the highest total among Denver players other than Jokic.
Cameron Johnson
Cameron Johnson finished with:
- 17 points
- 7 rebounds
- 1 assist
- 6-of-11 shooting
- 4-of-8 from three
- 2 steals
- 2 blocks
Johnson’s value went beyond his final point total.
He was one of the most important players during Denver’s late comeback. His four-point play in the fourth quarter and three-pointer in overtime helped change the momentum of the game.
Jamal Murray
Jamal Murray produced 15 points, 4 rebounds, and 10 assists.
He shot 6-of-13 overall and 3-of-7 from three.
His 10 assists gave Denver another high-level creator alongside Jokic.
Murray’s fourth-quarter three-point shooting was particularly significant because it helped initiate the run that brought Denver back into the game.
Aaron Gordon
Aaron Gordon contributed:
- 15 points
- 6 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 7-of-12 shooting
His most important contribution came late.
Gordon’s basket with 6.2 seconds remaining tied the game. His defensive work against Wembanyama on the final regulation possession was equally important.
This is a good example of why traditional box-score scoring totals do not always identify the most important individual plays.
Tim Hardaway Jr.
Tim Hardaway Jr. scored 10 points on 3-of-6 shooting.
He made two of four attempts from three-point range and added five rebounds.
His spacing helped Denver keep the floor open around Jokic, even when his overall scoring contribution was smaller than that of the team’s leading players.
Team Shooting Comparison
Shooting efficiency was one of the clearest differences in this game.
Denver finished 49-of-101 from the field, while San Antonio went 47-of-101.
That produced a relatively small field-goal percentage advantage for Denver:
- Denver: 48.5%
- San Antonio: 46.5%
The larger difference came from three-point shooting.
Denver made 19 of 46 three-point attempts, or 41.3 percent.
San Antonio made 15 of 45, or 33.3 percent.
That four-made-three difference produced 12 additional points for Denver from beyond the arc.
In a two-point overtime game, that is a major advantage.
San Antonio did have the better free-throw percentage. The Spurs converted 25 of 27 attempts, or 92.6 percent. Denver made 19 of 22, or 86.4 percent.
However, Denver’s three-point advantage helped offset San Antonio’s superior free-throw shooting.
Rebounding Battle
San Antonio won the rebounding battle 50-44.
That is significant because Wembanyama alone collected 18 rebounds.
The Spurs also grabbed 12 offensive rebounds compared with eight for Denver.
That created additional possessions and helped San Antonio remain competitive despite Denver’s stronger perimeter shooting.
Denver did a better job protecting its defensive possessions overall, but San Antonio’s offensive rebounding prevented the Nuggets from completely controlling the game.
This is one reason the final score remained so close.
Assists and Ball Security
Denver recorded 34 assists compared with 29 for San Antonio.
That five-assist advantage reflects the Nuggets’ emphasis on creating efficient team offense.
The bigger difference, however, was turnovers.
Denver committed only six turnovers.
San Antonio committed 10.
That four-turnover difference is important because the game was decided by only two points.
Denver also scored 18 fast-break points compared with 12 for San Antonio. The Nuggets turned their ability to create clean possessions into additional transition opportunities.
From a box-score analysis perspective, this is one of the strongest lessons from the game: when two teams are nearly identical in total field-goal attempts, possessions become extremely valuable.
Denver’s six turnovers meant fewer empty possessions.
Why Denver Won the Game
The final score alone does not fully explain Denver’s victory.
Four factors stand out.
1. Denver won the three-point efficiency battle
The Nuggets made four more three-pointers and shot eight percentage points better from deep.
That created a meaningful scoring advantage.
2. Jokic controlled the game without turning the ball over
Forty points and 13 assists would already represent an elite performance.
Doing that with zero turnovers made the performance even more valuable.
Jokic constantly placed San Antonio in difficult defensive situations.
3. Denver responded when San Antonio built a double-digit lead
The Spurs were in control for long stretches.
Instead of becoming dependent on difficult individual shots, Denver generated a late offensive push through Murray, Johnson, Gordon, and Jokic.
That balance made the comeback possible.
4. Denver defended Wembanyama better late
Wembanyama had 34 points and 18 rebounds, so it would be misleading to say Denver shut him down.
It did not.
But Denver changed the outcome by limiting his efficiency during the final stretch.
The NBA reported that Wembanyama shot only 1-of-4 during the final 14 minutes, including overtime.
That was a major defensive adjustment.
Why San Antonio Lost Despite Leading for Most of the Game
San Antonio’s defeat was not caused by one simple weakness.
The Spurs were actually ahead for most of regulation and built a significant fourth-quarter advantage.
The problem was maintaining offensive efficiency after Denver increased its defensive pressure.
San Antonio shot only 33 percent during the late stretch in which Denver completed its comeback.
The Spurs also gave Denver too many opportunities through turnovers and allowed the Nuggets to generate efficient three-point looks.
The 15-of-45 three-point shooting from San Antonio was not disastrous, but it was significantly below Denver’s 19-of-46 output.
When the game reached overtime, the margin for error became extremely small.
Denver made the necessary plays.
San Antonio did not.
Advanced Takeaways From the Box Score
The most useful way to study these denver nuggets vs san antonio spurs match player stats is to move beyond points.
Efficiency versus volume
San Antonio attempted the same number of field goals as Denver, 101 each.
Yet Denver scored two more points from those field goals because it converted slightly more attempts and made more threes.
This shows how shot quality and shot distribution can matter as much as volume.
Turnovers were extremely costly
A four-turnover difference might not look dramatic in a normal game.
In a 136-134 overtime contest, it becomes much more meaningful.
Denver’s six turnovers represented excellent possession management.
Rebounding did not guarantee victory
San Antonio won the rebounding battle by six.
The Spurs also had more offensive rebounds.
Yet Denver still won.
That demonstrates that controlling the glass does not automatically translate into victory when the opponent has advantages in shooting efficiency and turnovers.
Star power was balanced
Wembanyama had the better rebounding and shot-blocking totals.
Jokic had the better scoring and assist combination.
Neither player had a poor game.
The difference was how their supporting casts performed around them.
Denver’s supporting players made enough high-value plays during the final stages to convert Jokic’s performance into a win.
Season Series Context
The victory gave Denver a 2-1 advantage in the season series based on the supplied game data.
The earlier meetings also demonstrate how competitive this matchup had become.
The official NBA matchup history lists the teams meeting on November 28, March 12, April 4, and again on April 12 during the 2025-26 season.
The March 12 meeting was particularly relevant because Denver also came back from a 13-point fourth-quarter deficit to defeat San Antonio, according to the NBA’s game recap.
That makes the April comeback more than an isolated event.
It showed a recurring competitive pattern between these teams.
San Antonio could build leads through its size, length, rebounding, and efficient interior scoring.
Denver could respond through Jokic’s playmaking, perimeter shooting, half-court execution, and late-game decision-making.
What These Stats Mean for Future Matchups
There are several lessons that can be applied when evaluating future Nuggets-Spurs games.
First, Wembanyama’s presence changes the geometry of the court. Denver cannot simply attack the paint repeatedly without accounting for his shot-blocking ability.
Second, Jokic forces San Antonio into a difficult defensive choice. If the Spurs commit too much attention to him, Denver’s shooters can benefit.
Third, three-point shooting is likely to remain an important swing factor. The Nuggets made 41.3 percent of their threes in this contest, compared with 33.3 percent for San Antonio.
Fourth, turnovers matter enormously when these teams play close games. Denver’s six turnovers were an important advantage.
Finally, late-game execution deserves special attention. The April matchup was decided not by one dominant quarter but by Denver’s ability to recover from a major fourth-quarter deficit and then execute in overtime.
A Practical Way to Read NBA Player Stats
When analyzing a close NBA game, it is easy to focus only on the highest scorer.
A better method is to examine the game in layers.
Start with the final score and quarter breakdown.
Then compare:
- Field-goal percentage
- Three-point percentage
- Free-throw attempts
- Total rebounds
- Offensive rebounds
- Assists
- Turnovers
- Points from key players
- Fourth-quarter performance
- Overtime production
This approach provides a more complete picture.
For example, Wembanyama’s 34 points might initially suggest that San Antonio’s offense was successful.
That is true.
But looking at the fourth quarter and overtime shows that his efficiency dropped during the decisive stretch.
Likewise, Jokic’s 40 points immediately stand out, but his 13 assists and zero turnovers explain why his performance was so valuable beyond scoring.
Official Box Score and Game Data
For readers who want to verify the individual player lines, shooting percentages, minutes, plus-minus figures, and team totals, the official NBA box score provides the complete statistical record for the contest. official NBA box score
The official record lists the game as a 136-134 Denver overtime victory, with 20,039 people attending at Ball Arena.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the Nuggets vs Spurs game?
Nikola Jokic led all players with 40 points for Denver. Victor Wembanyama was San Antonio’s leading scorer with 34 points.
What was Victor Wembanyama’s stat line?
Wembanyama finished with 34 points, 18 rebounds, 7 assists, 5 blocks, and 1 steal. He shot 8-of-17 from the field and 16-of-17 from the free-throw line.
What was Nikola Jokic’s stat line?
Jokic recorded 40 points, 13 assists, and 8 rebounds. He shot 13-of-25 from the field and 13-of-15 from the free-throw line while committing zero turnovers.
Who won the Nuggets vs Spurs game?
The Denver Nuggets defeated the San Antonio Spurs 136-134 in overtime at Ball Arena.
How many three-pointers did each team make?
Denver made 19 of 46 three-point attempts, while San Antonio made 15 of 45.
Why did the Nuggets win?
Denver’s victory was driven by superior three-point shooting, six turnovers compared with San Antonio’s 10, 34 assists, Jokic’s 40-point performance, and a strong late-game defensive effort against Wembanyama.
Conclusion
The denver nuggets vs san antonio spurs match player stats reveal a game that was far more competitive than the final two-point margin suggests.
San Antonio controlled large portions of the contest. The Spurs scored 43 points in the first quarter, won the rebounding battle, received 34 points and 18 rebounds from Wembanyama, and entered the fourth quarter with a strong position.
Denver’s response was what ultimately separated the teams.
Jokic produced 40 points, 13 assists, 8 rebounds, and zero turnovers. Christian Braun added 21 points, Cameron Johnson provided critical late shooting, Jamal Murray supplied 10 assists, and Aaron Gordon delivered one of the most important sequences of the night with his late regulation basket and defensive possession against Wembanyama.
The team statistics reinforce the individual performances. Denver shot better from three, committed fewer turnovers, recorded more assists, and produced 18 fast-break points. San Antonio’s advantages in rebounding and free-throw accuracy were not enough to overcome those differences.
Most importantly, Denver showed the ability to stay composed after falling behind by double digits in the fourth quarter. The Nuggets turned a game that appeared to be slipping away into a 136-134 overtime victory.
For anyone studying the box score, the central lesson is clear: the winner was not determined by one statistic. Denver combined elite playmaking, efficient perimeter shooting, possession control, and late defensive execution to overcome San Antonio’s size, rebounding advantage, and dominant performance from Wembanyama.
The result also strengthened the importance of this matchup in the Western Conference. Both teams demonstrated why they were among the league’s strongest teams, and the narrow margin showed how little separated them when the game reached its most important possessions.
