Charlotte Hornets vs Knicks Match Player Stats

The charlotte hornets vs knicks match player stats from the March 20, 2025 meeting at Spectrum Center tell a much more detailed story than the final 115-98 score. Charlotte controlled the game from the opening quarter, shot 48.9% from the field and 46.9% from three, while New York struggled to generate efficient offense. LaMelo Ball led the Hornets with 25 points and eight assists, while Mark Williams added 19 points, 14 rebounds, and three blocks. For New York, OG Anunoby scored 25 points and Karl-Anthony Towns posted 24 points and 10 rebounds.

Charlotte Hornets vs Knicks Match Player Stats

The most useful way to examine this matchup is to move beyond points scored and look at shooting efficiency, rebounding, playmaking, turnovers, three-point production, and plus/minus.

Charlotte won 115-98, improving to 18-51, while New York dropped to 43-26. The Hornets also controlled the game across all four quarters:

Quarter	Knicks	Hornets
1st	19	27
2nd	25	27
3rd	28	31
4th	26	30
Final	98	115

Charlotte never allowed New York to establish a sustained offensive rhythm. The Hornets built a double-digit advantage through consistent scoring rather than relying on one explosive stretch.

That distinction matters when analyzing charlotte hornets vs knicks match player stats. A 17-point final margin can come from one dominant quarter, but this game was different. Charlotte outscored New York in every quarter.

Game Information

Category	Detail
Game	New York Knicks vs Charlotte Hornets
Date	March 20, 2025
Venue	Spectrum Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
Attendance	18,557
Final Score	Hornets 115, Knicks 98
Knicks Record	43-26
Hornets Record	18-51
Season Series	Knicks won 2-1

Team Statistical Comparison

Before looking at individual players, the team numbers explain why Charlotte was able to create such a comfortable margin.

Statistic	Knicks	Hornets
Points	98	115
Field Goals	36-90	43-88
FG Percentage	40.0%	48.9%
Three-Pointers	10-39	15-32
3PT Percentage	25.6%	46.9%
Free Throws	16-20	14-17
FT Percentage	80.0%	82.4%
Rebounds	38	52
Assists	26	25
Turnovers	7	11
Steals	9	1
Blocks	2	3

The difference in rebounding is one of the clearest statistical explanations for the result.

Charlotte collected 52 rebounds compared with New York’s 38, a 14-rebound advantage. That gave the Hornets additional possessions and helped them maintain control around the basket.

The second major difference was shooting.

Charlotte made 43 of 88 field-goal attempts, while New York made only 36 of 90. That represents seven more made shots despite Charlotte attempting two fewer field goals.

The three-point gap was even more significant. Charlotte made 15 of 32 attempts, while New York converted only 10 of 39.

That means Charlotte made five more three-pointers while taking seven fewer attempts.

LaMelo Ball’s 25 Points and 8 Assists

LaMelo Ball was the central offensive creator in the charlotte hornets vs knicks match player stats.

He finished with:

• 25 points
• 5 rebounds
• 8 assists
• 10-of-23 field goals
• 5-of-10 three-pointers
• 2 turnovers
• +2 plus/minus

Ball’s 25 points tied OG Anunoby for the highest scoring total by either team.

His three-point shooting was especially important. He made five of his 10 attempts from beyond the arc, accounting for 15 of his 25 points from long range.

That gave Charlotte an efficient perimeter scoring source without requiring Ball to dominate the ball on every possession.

His eight assists were also a key part of the Hornets’ offensive balance.

Charlotte had five players score at least 13 points, and Ball’s playmaking helped create opportunities for Mark Williams, Miles Bridges, DaQuan Jeffries, and Nick Smith Jr.

Why Ball’s Efficiency Mattered

Ball did not shoot 50% from the field, but his perimeter shooting changed the offensive geometry of the game.

Going 5-for-10 from three meant the Knicks could not treat his outside shot as a low-priority option.

Every made three also produced three points without requiring Charlotte to win a possession inside.

For this particular matchup, that was valuable because the Hornets were already winning the rebounding battle.

Mark Williams Dominated the Glass

Mark Williams produced one of the most important all-around performances of the game.

His line:

• 19 points
• 14 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 3 blocks
• 8-of-14 shooting
• 7 offensive rebounds
• +5 plus/minus

The 14 rebounds were the highest total by any player in the game.

More importantly, Williams grabbed seven offensive rebounds.

Offensive rebounds are particularly valuable because they extend possessions after an initial missed shot. Charlotte’s overall 52-38 rebounding advantage shows that this was not simply a one-player phenomenon, but Williams was a major reason for it.

His 8-of-14 shooting also gave Charlotte an efficient interior scoring option.

Williams Versus New York’s Frontcourt

Karl-Anthony Towns had an excellent individual scoring and rebounding performance, but the overall frontcourt battle still favored Charlotte.

Towns recorded 24 points and 10 rebounds.

Williams recorded 19 points and 14 rebounds.

So Towns scored five more points, but Williams collected four additional rebounds and added three blocks.

That difference becomes more meaningful when combined with Charlotte’s overall 14-rebound team advantage.

Miles Bridges Added a Double-Double

Miles Bridges quietly produced one of the strongest two-way statistical performances for Charlotte.

He finished with:

• 15 points
• 10 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 6-of-17 shooting
• 2-of-5 from three
• +20 plus/minus

The +20 plus/minus was the best mark in the game.

Although plus/minus should not be treated as a standalone measure of individual performance, it provides useful context when combined with the rest of the box score.

Bridges contributed on the glass, scored in multiple ways, and helped Charlotte maintain a positive possession balance.

His 10 rebounds also meant that both Bridges and Williams recorded double-doubles.

DaQuan Jeffries Provided Efficient Perimeter Scoring

DaQuan Jeffries finished with:

• 14 points
• 4 rebounds
• 3-of-5 from three
• 4-of-7 overall shooting
• +8 plus/minus

His three-point shooting was one of the important supporting elements behind Charlotte’s 15-for-32 performance from deep.

Jeffries did not need a large volume of attempts.

Instead, he converted three of his five three-point attempts.

That is an important lesson when studying the charlotte hornets vs knicks match player stats. Charlotte did not depend exclusively on Ball to make every perimeter shot. Multiple players contributed efficiently from outside.

Nick Smith Jr. Supplied Valuable Bench Production

Nick Smith Jr. gave Charlotte 13 points in 26:54.

His statistics included:

• 13 points
• 4 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 2-of-4 from three
• +16 plus/minus

The +16 figure stands out.

Smith Jr. was one of the major contributors to Charlotte’s productive second unit, and his shooting helped prevent the Knicks from closing the scoring gap when Charlotte’s starters were not carrying the entire offense.

Jusuf Nurkic also made an impact in limited minutes, scoring nine points on 3-of-3 shooting and making both of his three-point attempts.

Knicks Player Stats: OG Anunoby Led New York

OG Anunoby finished with 25 points, making him New York’s leading scorer.

His full line:

• 25 points
• 6 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 3 steals
• 7-of-19 field goals
• 3-of-12 from three
• 8-of-8 free throws
• -17 plus/minus

Anunoby’s free-throw shooting was perfect, but his overall field-goal efficiency was limited.

He shot 7-for-19 from the field and 3-for-12 from three.

That combination illustrates an important distinction between raw scoring and scoring efficiency.

Twenty-five points looks impressive in isolation, but the 19 field-goal attempts required a significant amount of offensive volume.

His three steals were also valuable individually, although New York could not convert its defensive activity into enough efficient offense.

Karl-Anthony Towns Recorded a Double-Double

Karl-Anthony Towns was New York’s other major offensive contributor.

He finished with:

• 24 points
• 10 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 2-of-4 from three
• 10-of-21 field goals
• -15 plus/minus

Towns was considerably more efficient from the field than Anunoby, converting 10 of 21 attempts.

He also secured a double-double.

However, his individual production did not translate into a Knicks victory because Charlotte received stronger contributions across a larger portion of its rotation.

Josh Hart’s All-Around Contribution

Josh Hart finished with:

• 13 points
• 4 rebounds
• 6 assists
• 3-of-3 from three
• -16 plus/minus

His six assists tied him for the Knicks’ team lead.

Hart was perfect from three, which is notable because New York as a team shot only 10-for-39 from long range.

His performance shows that individual efficiency can exist even when the team struggles offensively.

Hart did his part as a passer and perimeter shooter, but Charlotte’s collective shooting advantage was too large to overcome.

Mikal Bridges and Miles McBride as Playmakers

Mikal Bridges contributed:

• 16 points
• 4 rebounds
• 6 assists
• 3 steals
• -9 plus/minus

Miles McBride added:

• 9 points
• 3 rebounds
• 6 assists
• -11 plus/minus

That gave New York three players with six assists each: Hart, Bridges, and McBride.

New York therefore had adequate ball distribution.

The bigger issue was conversion.

The Knicks finished with 26 assists on 36 made field goals, while Charlotte had 25 assists on 43 made field goals.

Charlotte’s assist total was almost identical despite making seven more field goals.

That suggests the primary difference was not simply passing volume. It was shot-making and possession quality.

Full Charlotte Hornets Player Stats

Player	PTS	REB	AST	FG	3PT	+/-
LaMelo Ball	25	5	8	10-23	5-10	+2
Mark Williams	19	14	4	8-14	0-0	+5
Miles Bridges	15	10	4	6-17	2-5	+20
DaQuan Jeffries	14	4	0	4-7	3-5	+8
Nick Smith Jr.	13	4	3	4-10	2-4	+16
Jusuf Nurkic	9	7	0	3-3	2-2	+16
Moussa Diabate	7	5	0	2-3	0-1	+4
Josh Green	5	0	1	2-5	1-4	+8
Seth Curry	4	1	3	2-3	0-0	+8
Taj Gibson	2	1	0	1-1	0-0	-2
Wendell Moore Jr.	2	1	2	1-2	0-1	0

Charlotte’s balance is immediately visible.

Five players scored at least 13 points, while Williams and Bridges both recorded double-doubles.

The Hornets also received meaningful production from the bench, particularly Smith Jr. and Nurkic.

Full Knicks Player Stats

Player	PTS	REB	AST	FG	3PT	+/-
OG Anunoby	25	6	2	7-19	3-12	-17
Karl-Anthony Towns	24	10	3	10-21	2-4	-15
Mikal Bridges	16	4	6	Not provided	Not provided	-9
Josh Hart	13	4	6	5-8	3-3	-16
Miles McBride	9	3	6	Not provided	1-6	-11
Cameron Payne	5	3	3	Not provided	1-4	-9
Precious Achiuwa	2	6	0	Not provided	Not provided	-5
Anton Watson	2	1	0	Not provided	Not provided	+2
MarJon Beauchamp	2	1	0	Not provided	Not provided	+2
Tyler Kolek	0	0	0	Not provided	Not provided	+2
Landry Shamet	0	1	0	Not provided	Not provided	-9

New York received strong scoring from Anunoby and Towns, but the production was less evenly distributed.

That contrast is one of the biggest takeaways from this matchup.

The Three-Point Battle Changed the Game

The simplest statistical explanation for the 17-point margin may be the three-point differential.

Charlotte:

15-for-32, 46.9%

New York:

10-for-39, 25.6%

Charlotte therefore made five more three-pointers while attempting seven fewer.

Using only the made three-pointers, that represents a 15-point scoring advantage from beyond the arc.

New York’s poor three-point conversion rate meant that several possessions ended without enough scoring return.

Meanwhile, Charlotte’s 46.9% accuracy gave the Hornets an efficient source of offense.

Ball was 5-for-10.

Jeffries was 3-for-5.

Bridges was 2-for-5.

Smith Jr. was 2-for-4.

Nurkic was 2-for-2.

That distribution is particularly important because Charlotte was not dependent on a single shooter.

Rebounding Was Another Major Difference

Charlotte won the rebounding battle 52-38.

That is a 14-rebound advantage.

The Hornets also collected 11 offensive rebounds compared with nine for New York.

Mark Williams alone accounted for seven offensive rebounds.

This combination helped Charlotte maintain pressure even when individual shots did not fall.

For a team shooting 48.9%, additional possessions can turn a good offensive night into a very productive one.

New York, meanwhile, needed to overcome both the shooting deficit and the rebounding gap.

Turnovers Did Not Explain the Loss

One interesting feature of the box score is that New York actually protected the ball better.

The Knicks committed only seven turnovers.

Charlotte committed 11.

Normally, a four-turnover disadvantage can create concerns about possession management.

But New York could not capitalize enough on Charlotte’s mistakes.

The Knicks also recorded nine steals compared with only one for Charlotte.

That defensive activity was not enough to offset the shooting and rebounding differences.

This is an important reminder when interpreting charlotte hornets vs knicks match player stats: no single box-score category should automatically be treated as the explanation for a result.

Charlotte Won Every Quarter

The quarter-by-quarter progression is one of the clearest indicators of game control.

First Quarter: Hornets 27, Knicks 19

Charlotte immediately established an eight-point advantage.

New York’s 19 points meant the Knicks began the game below the offensive level they would need to keep pace.

Second Quarter: Hornets 27, Knicks 25

The Knicks slightly improved their offensive output, but Charlotte still won the quarter.

At halftime, the Hornets had a 54-44 advantage.

Third Quarter: Hornets 31, Knicks 28

New York scored 28 points, but Charlotte responded with 31.

The Knicks therefore failed to produce the kind of third-quarter swing that could have erased the halftime deficit.

Fourth Quarter: Hornets 30, Knicks 26

Charlotte finished the game strongly.

The Hornets never surrendered control and ultimately won by 17.

What the Plus/Minus Numbers Tell Us

Plus/minus requires context, but this game provides some useful signals.

Miles Bridges posted +20, the highest figure in the matchup.

Nick Smith Jr. and Jusuf Nurkic each recorded +16.

DaQuan Jeffries was +8.

Josh Green was +8.

For New York, the leading plus/minus figures among players with positive minutes were not enough to change the overall result.

Anunoby finished at -17.

Hart finished at -16.

Towns finished at -15.

Those numbers align with the team-level result because New York’s primary rotation players were on the floor during stretches when Charlotte extended its lead.

Plus/minus does not prove that one player individually caused a result, but when several major rotation players have negative figures in a 17-point loss, it provides useful context for the flow of the game.

Bench Production Gave Charlotte More Balance

The Hornets received important contributions beyond their five starters.

Nick Smith Jr. scored 13.

Jusuf Nurkic scored 9.

Moussa Diabate scored 7.

Seth Curry scored 4.

Taj Gibson and Wendell Moore Jr. added two points each.

That gave Charlotte several secondary scoring options.

New York also received bench minutes, but its offensive production remained concentrated around Anunoby, Towns, Bridges, and Hart.

This difference matters because a team can survive an inefficient shooting night from one starter if multiple teammates compensate.

Charlotte had that compensation.

Why the Game Was More Competitive Statistically Than the Score Suggests

The final score says 115-98, but several categories were relatively close.

Assists were 25-26.

Turnovers were 11-7.

Free-throw percentages were 82.4% and 80%.

Steals actually favored New York by a wide margin.

Yet Charlotte still won comfortably.

The reason is that the most valuable differences were concentrated in high-impact areas:

1. Charlotte made seven more field goals.
2. Charlotte made five more three-pointers.
3. Charlotte shot dramatically better from three.
4. Charlotte won the rebounding battle by 14.
5. Charlotte received scoring from five players in double figures.

This is why a box score should be read as a connected system rather than as a list of isolated statistics.

Knicks vs Hornets Season Series

Although Charlotte won this particular matchup, New York still won the season series 2-1.

The three meetings were:

• November 29, 2024: Knicks 99, Hornets 98
• December 6, 2024: Knicks 125, Hornets 101
• March 20, 2025: Hornets 115, Knicks 98

The March meeting was therefore Charlotte’s first win over New York in the season series after two earlier Knicks victories.

The contrast between the games is useful because it shows how much a single matchup can change based on shooting efficiency, rebounding, availability, and game flow.

What These Player Stats Reveal

The strongest takeaway is not simply that Charlotte scored more.

The deeper point is that the Hornets won through several interconnected advantages.

Charlotte Had Multiple Reliable Scorers

Ball scored 25.

Williams scored 19.

Bridges scored 15.

Jeffries scored 14.

Smith Jr. scored 13.

That balance reduced the pressure on any one player.

Charlotte Controlled the Interior

Williams’ 14 rebounds and three blocks were central to the frontcourt battle.

Bridges added another 10 rebounds.

Together, they gave Charlotte 24 rebounds from two players.

Charlotte Won the Perimeter Efficiency Battle

The Hornets shot 46.9% from three.

New York shot 25.6%.

That is an enormous difference over a full game.

New York’s Stars Still Produced

It would be inaccurate to describe the Knicks’ leading players as non-contributors.

Anunoby had 25 points.

Towns had 24 points and 10 rebounds.

Hart, Bridges, and McBride each had six assists.

The problem was that their production did not overcome Charlotte’s collective efficiency.

How to Read These Stats for Fantasy and Player Analysis

For anyone studying historical player performance, this game offers several useful lessons.

Points Alone Are Not Enough

Ball and Anunoby both scored 25.

Their supporting statistics and efficiency were different.

Ball added eight assists and shot 5-for-10 from three.

Anunoby added six rebounds and three steals but shot 7-for-19 overall and 3-for-12 from three.

Rebounds Can Explain Possession Control

Williams’ 14 rebounds, including seven offensive boards, were more informative than his 19 points alone.

Plus/Minus Needs Context

Bridges’ +20 stands out, but it should be considered alongside his 15 points, 10 rebounds, four assists, and Charlotte’s overall dominance.

Shooting Volume and Efficiency Should Be Separated

Anunoby attempted 19 field goals.

Towns attempted 21.

Ball attempted 23.

The number of attempts tells you about usage, while shooting percentage tells you about conversion efficiency.

Both matter.

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the Charlotte Hornets vs Knicks match player stats?

Charlotte defeated New York 115-98. LaMelo Ball led the Hornets with 25 points and eight assists, while Mark Williams had 19 points and 14 rebounds. OG Anunoby led New York with 25 points, and Karl-Anthony Towns added 24 points and 10 rebounds.

Who scored the most points for the Hornets?

LaMelo Ball led Charlotte with 25 points. He also recorded eight assists, five rebounds, and five made three-pointers.

Who led the Knicks in scoring?

OG Anunoby led New York with 25 points. Karl-Anthony Towns was close behind with 24 points and also recorded 10 rebounds.

Who had the most rebounds in the game?

Mark Williams led all players with 14 rebounds. He also scored 19 points and blocked three shots.

How well did the Hornets shoot from three?

Charlotte made 15 of 32 three-point attempts, finishing at 46.9%. New York made 10 of 39, or 25.6%.

Did the Knicks win the season series?

Yes. Despite losing this March matchup, New York won the 2024-25 season series 2-1 after winning the first two meetings.

Conclusion

The charlotte hornets vs knicks match player stats from this matchup show how a team can win through balanced production rather than relying on one dominant individual performance.

LaMelo Ball’s 25 points and eight assists provided Charlotte with primary offensive creation. Mark Williams controlled the glass with 14 rebounds and added three blocks. Miles Bridges supplied a double-double and posted the game’s best plus/minus at +20. DaQuan Jeffries and Nick Smith Jr. added efficient perimeter scoring that helped Charlotte maintain its offensive pressure.

For New York, OG Anunoby and Karl-Anthony Towns both delivered 20-point performances, while Josh Hart, Mikal Bridges, and Miles McBride each contributed six assists. The Knicks also committed only seven turnovers and produced nine steals.

The deciding differences were therefore more specific. Charlotte shot 48.9% from the field against New York’s 40.0%, made 15 three-pointers compared with 10, and won the rebounding battle 52-38. Those advantages remained visible throughout all four quarters, producing the 115-98 final result.

One date clarification is important for anyone publishing or archiving this game: the official NBA record identifies the matchup as March 20, 2025, even though the supplied data labels it March 21. The venue, score, player statistics, attendance, and quarter results correspond to the March 20 game.