Celtics vs Washington Wizards Match Player Stats
The celtics vs washington wizards match player stats from March 15, 2026, tell a much more detailed story than the 111-100 final score alone. Boston Celtics defeated the Washington Wizards at TD Garden in Boston, improving their record to 44-23 while Washington fell to 16-50. The game also completed a 3-0 season-series sweep for Boston. For readers studying the box score, the most useful details are the individual performances, rebounding difference, shooting efficiency, playmaking, and the way Boston built a commanding second-quarter advantage before Washington attempted to recover.
The Celtics won despite shooting only 26% from three-point range, which makes the result particularly interesting. Their advantage came from other areas, most notably rebounding, free-throw accuracy, and interior production. Washington shot 38% from three, but its 65% free-throw shooting and 38 total rebounds were not enough to overcome Boston’s 55 rebounds and 89% free-throw accuracy.
This breakdown examines the individual numbers, team statistics, quarter-by-quarter flow, and the tactical meaning behind the box score.
celtics vs washington wizards match player stats
The headline individual numbers immediately show how balanced Boston’s production was.
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Other |
| Neemias Queta | 24 | 10 | 3 | 2 BLK |
| Jayson Tatum | 20 | 14 | 7 | 2 STL |
| Jaylen Brown | 16 | 4 | 3 | |
| Derrick White | 15 | 6 | 5 | 3-8 3PT |
| Sam Hauser | 12 | 6 | 2 | 4-11 3PT |
| Trae Young | 11 | 4 | 6 | |
| Bilal Coulibaly | 12 | 4 | 1 | 2 STL, 2 BLK |
| Will Riley | 5 | 5 | 3 | |
| Tre Johnson | 7 | 1 | 2 |
Neemias Queta was Boston’s leading scorer with 24 points and also recorded 10 rebounds. His double-double was one of the clearest individual indicators of Boston’s interior strength.
Jayson Tatum produced one of the most complete statistical performances of the night. He finished with 20 points, 14 rebounds, seven assists, and two steals. While he was not Boston’s leading scorer, his rebounding and playmaking numbers gave him an important all-around impact.
Derrick White added 15 points, six rebounds, and five assists while making three of his eight three-point attempts. Jaylen Brown contributed 16 points, four rebounds, and three assists.
For Washington, Tristan Vukcevic led all Wizards scorers with 22 points. Jamir Watkins led Washington in rebounding with six, while Bub Carrington recorded eight assists.
Boston Celtics Player Performance Breakdown
Neemias Queta
Queta’s 24 points made him the game’s leading scorer. He also collected 10 rebounds and three assists, giving Boston a strong interior contribution.
His 24-point, 10-rebound double-double stands out because Boston did not rely on elite three-point shooting to reach 111 points. Instead, the Celtics generated substantial value through their frontcourt production and work on the glass.
Queta also recorded two blocks, adding a defensive dimension to his offensive output.
Jayson Tatum
Tatum’s stat line was arguably the most complete on the Boston roster:
- 20 points
- 14 rebounds
- 7 assists
- 2 steals
The 14 rebounds were particularly significant. Boston finished with 55 team rebounds compared with Washington’s 38, creating a 17-rebound advantage.
Tatum’s seven assists also demonstrate that his contribution was not limited to scoring. He helped connect possessions and create opportunities for teammates.
When evaluating a player’s influence from a box score, this type of line is useful because it covers multiple categories rather than relying exclusively on points.
Jaylen Brown
Brown finished with 16 points, four rebounds, and three assists.
His scoring placed him second among Boston’s listed perimeter scorers, behind Tatum and alongside a broader group that helped spread the offensive workload.
Boston did not need one player to carry the entire scoring burden. That distribution was important because Washington had multiple contributors of its own.
Derrick White
White recorded:
- 15 points
- 6 rebounds
- 5 assists
- 3-for-8 from three-point range
His five assists were second among the listed Boston players, behind Tatum’s seven.
White also supplied respectable perimeter shooting while contributing on the glass. His 3-for-8 three-point performance was more efficient than Boston’s overall 12-for-46 team mark.
Sam Hauser
Hauser scored 12 points, grabbed six rebounds, and added two assists. He made four of his 11 three-point attempts.
His four made threes were the highest total among Boston’s listed players. Even though Boston struggled collectively from long range, Hauser provided an important portion of the team’s perimeter scoring.
Trae Young
Young finished with 11 points, four rebounds, and six assists.
The six assists were notable because they gave Boston another meaningful playmaking source alongside Tatum and White.
Washington Wizards Player Performance Breakdown
Tristan Vukcevic
Vukcevic led Washington with 22 points.
That scoring total was the strongest individual offensive output for the Wizards and represented a major part of Washington’s attempt to stay within reach after Boston’s second-quarter surge.
The Wizards ultimately scored 100 points, meaning Vukcevic accounted for a substantial portion of their offense.
Bub Carrington
Carrington led Washington with eight assists.
That number is especially important when examining the Wizards’ 28 total assists. His eight assists represented a significant share of the team’s overall playmaking.
Washington’s passing numbers were competitive with Boston, which finished with 29 assists. The difference in the final result therefore cannot simply be explained by assist production.
Jamir Watkins
Watkins led Washington with six rebounds.
Washington finished with 38 total rebounds, well below Boston’s 55. As a result, Watkins’ team-leading six boards were not enough to close the broader gap on the glass.
Bilal Coulibaly
Coulibaly finished with 12 points, four rebounds, one assist, two steals, and two blocks.
His defensive statistics stand out. Two steals and two blocks gave him four recorded defensive plays in those categories, showing activity beyond his scoring contribution.
Will Riley and Tre Johnson
Will Riley recorded five points, five rebounds, and three assists.
Tre Johnson finished with seven points, one rebound, and two assists.
Their numbers show that Washington received contributions across its rotation, but the overall production did not match Boston’s advantages in rebounding and free-throw efficiency.
How the Game Was Won Quarter by Quarter
The quarter scores explain the final result more clearly than the 11-point margin alone.
| Quarter | Washington | Boston |
| 1st | 27 | 29 |
| 2nd | 14 | 35 |
| 3rd | 31 | 29 |
| 4th | 28 | 18 |
| Final | 100 | 111 |
The opening quarter was competitive. Boston held only a two-point advantage after the first period.
The game changed substantially in the second quarter.
Boston scored 35 points while Washington managed only 14. That created a 21-point swing in the period and gave the Celtics a substantial cushion heading into halftime.
Washington responded in the third quarter by scoring 31 points, four more than Boston. The Wizards continued that offensive momentum in the fourth, scoring 28 points while Boston scored 18.
However, the recovery was not enough.
This is an important lesson when interpreting a basketball box score. A team can win the second half and still lose the game comfortably if an earlier stretch creates too large a deficit.
celtics vs washington wizards match player stats and Team Shooting
The team shooting numbers present an interesting contrast.
Boston:
- 41-of-93 from the field
- 44% field-goal shooting
- 12-of-46 from three
- 26% three-point shooting
- 17-of-19 free throws
- 89% free-throw shooting
Washington:
- 37-of-84 from the field
- 44% field-goal shooting
- 15-of-39 from three
- 38% three-point shooting
- 11-of-17 free throws
- 65% free-throw shooting
Both teams shot 44% from the field.
That means field-goal percentage alone does not explain Boston’s victory.
The biggest shooting difference came from three-point volume and free throws. Washington was considerably more accurate from three, making 15 compared with Boston’s 12.
Yet Boston attempted 46 three-pointers, seven more than Washington.
The Celtics also made six more free throws while attempting only two additional free throws. Their 17-for-19 performance from the line was highly efficient.
The Rebounding Difference Was Crucial
One of the strongest statistical separators was rebounding.
Boston grabbed 55 rebounds.
Washington grabbed 38.
That is a 17-rebound advantage for the Celtics.
A rebound does not automatically produce points, but controlling the glass can affect possession volume, defensive stops, and second-chance opportunities.
Tatum’s 14 rebounds and Queta’s 10 rebounds were central to Boston’s advantage.
White and Hauser also contributed six rebounds apiece, giving Boston several players who helped dominate the boards rather than depending on one rebounder.
For Washington, Watkins led the team with six rebounds, while Coulibaly had four and Riley had five.
The overall numbers show why Boston could withstand a poor three-point shooting night.
Ball Movement and Turnovers
Boston recorded 29 assists and 14 turnovers.
Washington recorded 28 assists and 13 turnovers.
The similarity is striking.
Boston had only one more assist than Washington and one more turnover.
That means passing efficiency and turnover volume were not the main statistical reasons for the 11-point difference.
Instead, Boston’s edge was more visible in rebounding, free-throw shooting, and the massive second quarter.
Tatum’s seven assists, White’s five assists, and Young’s six assists gave Boston multiple playmaking outlets.
Washington’s Carrington led the team with eight assists, which was actually the highest individual assist total among the players listed from either team.
celtics vs washington wizards match player stats: What the Numbers Really Mean
A basic box-score summary might say Boston won 111-100.
A deeper reading reveals several different layers.
1. Boston did not need hot three-point shooting
The Celtics shot only 26% from three.
That is a relatively poor perimeter shooting night, especially for a team that attempted 46 threes.
Yet Boston still reached 111 points.
That suggests its offensive production was supported by areas outside long-range accuracy.
2. Washington’s three-point advantage did not translate into a win
Washington shot 38% from three and made 15 threes.
Boston made only 12.
Despite that six-point difference in made three-pointers, Boston won.
This is a useful reminder that one shooting category should not be treated as a complete explanation for a basketball result.
3. Boston dominated the glass
The 55-38 rebounding advantage was one of the clearest statistical differences.
The Celtics’ frontcourt production was especially strong, with Queta collecting 10 and Tatum 14.
4. Free throws favored Boston
Boston made 17 of 19 free throws.
Washington made 11 of 17.
Boston therefore converted 89% of its attempts, while Washington converted 65%.
The six additional made free throws mattered in a game decided by 11 points.
5. The second quarter created the separation
The second quarter was the pivotal scoring period.
Boston’s 35 points against Washington’s 14 created a 21-point advantage for the Celtics in one quarter.
The Wizards played much better offensively after halftime, but the damage had already been done.
Statistical Comparison
| Category | Celtics | Wizards |
| Final Score | 111 | 100 |
| FG | 41-93 | 37-84 |
| FG% | 44% | 44% |
| 3PT | 12-46 | 15-39 |
| 3PT% | 26% | 38% |
| FT | 17-19 | 11-17 |
| FT% | 89% | 65% |
| Rebounds | 55 | 38 |
| Assists | 29 | 28 |
| Turnovers | 14 | 13 |
| Steals | 8 | 9 |
| Blocks | 4 | 4 |
This comparison demonstrates why a simple shooting-percentage analysis would be incomplete.
The teams had identical field-goal percentages.
Washington had the better three-point percentage.
Washington also had one fewer turnover and one more steal.
Boston’s major advantages came from rebounding and free-throw conversion, combined with its huge second-quarter scoring burst.
What the Season Series Says
Boston completed a 3-0 season-series sweep against Washington.
The sweep is meaningful in the context of the season because it shows that the Celtics won all three meetings between the teams.
However, individual game statistics should still be evaluated independently.
A season series does not mean every game followed the same pattern. For this March 15 meeting, the most distinctive features were Boston’s second-quarter performance, its 55 rebounds, and the strong individual work from Queta and Tatum.
Home-Court Context
The game was played at TD Garden in Boston, with an attendance of 19,156.
Boston entered the game with a 22-10 home record.
Washington entered with a 5-28 away record.
Those records provide useful context when interpreting the result.
Boston’s overall record was 44-23, while Washington’s was 16-50.
The game therefore involved two teams entering from very different positions in the standings, and the final result reflected Boston’s ability to protect home court.
Why Jayson Tatum’s 14 Rebounds Matter
Points often receive the most attention in NBA coverage, but Tatum’s 14 rebounds deserve special attention.
He was Boston’s top rebounder.
That becomes even more important when viewed alongside Queta’s 10 rebounds.
Together, those two players collected 24 rebounds.
Boston finished with 55 overall.
Their combined work on the glass helped create the structural advantage that is visible throughout the team statistics.
Tatum also added seven assists and two steals, making his contribution multidimensional.
His final line of 20 points, 14 rebounds, and seven assists demonstrates how a star player’s impact can extend well beyond scoring.
Why Neemias Queta Was the Leading Scorer
Queta’s 24 points were the highest individual total in the game.
He also recorded 10 rebounds and three assists.
His double-double was particularly valuable because Boston’s outside shooting was inefficient.
When perimeter shooting falls below expectations, interior scoring and rebounding become even more important.
Queta’s performance helped offset Boston’s 26% three-point shooting.
Washington’s Bright Spots
Despite losing, Washington had several individual performances worth noting.
Vukcevic’s 22 points gave the Wizards a reliable scoring source.
Carrington’s eight assists demonstrated strong playmaking production.
Coulibaly contributed 12 points while recording two steals and two blocks.
Riley added five rebounds and three assists.
Washington also shot 38% from three, which was considerably better than Boston’s 26%.
The problem was that those positive elements did not overcome the Celtics’ second-quarter surge and rebounding advantage.
celtics vs washington wizards match player stats for Fantasy and Statistical Analysis
Readers using these numbers for fantasy basketball analysis should avoid looking only at points.
Tatum’s value is evident from his 20 points, 14 rebounds, seven assists, and two steals.
Queta’s 24 points, 10 rebounds, three assists, and two blocks provide a different form of statistical value.
White contributed across several categories with 15 points, six rebounds, and five assists.
Hauser’s four made three-pointers also give his line a distinctive perimeter profile.
For Washington, Carrington’s eight assists and Vukcevic’s 22 points stand out, while Coulibaly’s defensive statistics add value beyond his 12 points.
These differences show why category-based analysis can be more informative than simply ranking players by scoring.
A Practical Way to Read This Box Score
If you are trying to understand this game quickly, focus on five numbers first:
- 111-100: Boston won by 11.
- 55-38: Boston dominated rebounding.
- 35-14: Boston controlled the second quarter.
- 17-19 vs 11-17: Boston was much more efficient at the free-throw line.
- 12-46 vs 15-39 from three: Washington shot better from three despite losing.
Those five comparisons explain much of the game without requiring a long statistical deep dive.
For official league information and broader NBA statistics, readers can consult the NBA official website.
What This Game Teaches About Basketball Statistics
This matchup is a good example of why basketball analysis should not depend on one metric.
- If someone looked only at three-point percentage, Washington would appear to have a major advantage.
- If someone looked only at turnovers, the teams were almost identical.
- If someone looked only at assists, the teams were again nearly even.
But once rebounds and free throws are included, the result becomes easier to understand.
Boston controlled the boards by 17 rebounds and converted free throws at a much higher rate. It also produced a 21-point advantage in the second quarter.
That combination outweighed Washington’s superior three-point accuracy.
The lesson is simple: basketball games are decided by possessions and points generated across multiple phases of play, not by one box-score category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the top scorer in Celtics vs Washington Wizards?
Neemias Queta was Boston’s leading scorer and the game’s top scorer with 24 points. Washington’s leading scorer was Tristan Vukcevic with 22 points.
What was the final score of Celtics vs Washington Wizards?
The Boston Celtics defeated the Washington Wizards 111-100 on March 15, 2026, at TD Garden.
How many rebounds did Jayson Tatum have?
Jayson Tatum recorded 14 rebounds. He also finished with 20 points, seven assists, and two steals.
Who led the Wizards in assists?
Bub Carrington led Washington with eight assists.
Which team shot better from three-point range?
Washington shot better from three. The Wizards made 15 of 39 attempts for 38%, while Boston made 12 of 46 attempts for 26%.
How many rebounds did Boston have?
Boston recorded 55 rebounds compared with Washington’s 38, giving the Celtics a 17-rebound advantage.
Conclusion
The celtics vs washington wizards match player stats from March 15, 2026, reveal a game in which Boston won through balance rather than exceptional three-point shooting.
Neemias Queta led all scorers with 24 points and added 10 rebounds. Jayson Tatum delivered an all-around performance with 20 points, 14 rebounds, seven assists, and two steals. Derrick White contributed 15 points, six rebounds, and five assists, while Jaylen Brown scored 16.
Washington received 22 points from Tristan Vukcevic and eight assists from Bub Carrington, while Bilal Coulibaly added 12 points, four rebounds, two steals, and two blocks.
The team numbers explain the final result even more clearly. Boston and Washington both shot 44% from the field, while Washington had the superior three-point percentage. Boston, however, dominated rebounding 55-38 and converted 17 of 19 free throws. The Celtics also produced a decisive 35-14 second quarter.
Boston ultimately won 111-100 and completed a 3-0 season-series sweep. The game stands as a useful example of why a complete player and team statistical analysis should examine scoring, rebounding, playmaking, shooting efficiency, turnovers, and quarter-by-quarter performance together rather than relying on a single headline statistic.
