The memphis grizzlies vs houston rockets match player stats from January 27, 2026, tell the story of a competitive NBA game decided by Houston’s strong fourth-quarter performance. The Houston Rockets defeated the Memphis Grizzlies 108-99 at Toyota Center in Houston, Texas. Kevin Durant and Alperen Sengun led the Rockets with 33 points each, while Amen Thompson contributed 14 assists to help organize the offense. Memphis received 17 points apiece from Jaren Jackson Jr. and Santi Aldama, but the Grizzlies struggled with their shooting efficiency, particularly from three-point range. Houston’s superior field-goal percentage, rebounding advantage, and 32-point fourth quarter proved decisive in a nine-point victory.

This game offers a useful example of why basketball results cannot be explained by scoring alone. Memphis recorded more steals and committed fewer turnovers, yet Houston converted a greater share of its field-goal attempts and generated more assists. Examining the team statistics alongside individual performances reveals how Houston created its advantage, why Memphis remained competitive, and which player contributions mattered most to the final result.

Table of Contents

Game Overview: Memphis Grizzlies vs Houston Rockets Match Player Stats

The matchup took place at Toyota Center on January 27, 2026. Houston entered the game with a stronger overall record and an impressive home record, while Memphis was looking to improve its results away from home.

Houston Rockets

Home team

108

Record: 28-16

Final

108-99

Houston by 9

Memphis Grizzlies

Away team

99

Record: 18-26

Date

January 27, 2026

Venue

Toyota Center

Location

Houston, Texas

Attendance

18,055

Houston’s victory extended its lead to 2-0 in the season series shown in the supplied matchup data. The final score reflects a game in which Memphis stayed close for three quarters before Houston found another level offensively in the final period.

Final score by quarter

Quarter	Memphis Grizzlies	Houston Rockets
First quarter	24	23
Second quarter	30	28
Third quarter	23	25
Fourth quarter	22	32
Final score	99	108

The quarter-by-quarter breakdown explains the result more clearly than the final score alone.

First quarter: Memphis took a narrow 24-23 lead.
Second quarter: Memphis added 30 points and led 54-51 at halftime.
Third quarter: Houston scored 25 points to Memphis’s 23, reducing the gap to one point.
Fourth quarter: Houston scored 32 points while holding Memphis to 22, turning a close contest into a nine-point win.

The decisive change came in the final 12 minutes. Houston outscored Memphis by 10 points in the fourth quarter, overcoming a three-point halftime deficit and a one-point deficit after the third.

Complete Team Statistics and Shooting Efficiency

The team box score shows that Houston’s advantage was primarily about shot-making and offensive execution rather than forcing Memphis into mistakes.

Statistical category	Memphis	Houston
Points	99	108
Field goals made/attempted	39/105	41/92
Field-goal percentage	37%	45%
Three-pointers made/attempted	7/37	11/37
Three-point percentage	19%	30%
Free throws made/attempted	14/17	15/20
Free-throw percentage	82%	75%
Total rebounds	52	57
Assists	26	29
Turnovers	13	16
Steals	9	9
Blocks	5	3

These numbers identify several important differences between the teams.

1. Houston scored more efficiently

Houston made 41 of 92 field-goal attempts, while Memphis made 39 of 105. Houston therefore scored nine more points despite attempting 13 fewer shots from the field.

The reported field-goal percentages were 45% for Houston and 37% for Memphis. That eight-percentage-point gap is substantial in a game decided by nine points.

Memphis generated a high number of attempts but converted too few of them. Houston needed fewer attempts to produce a greater scoring total, giving it a meaningful efficiency advantage.

One important distinction is that field-goal percentage does not account for free throws. However, the supplied figures show that Houston also had a slight advantage in free-throw points, scoring 15 compared with Memphis’s 14.

2. Three-point shooting created separation

Both teams attempted 37 three-pointers, making this one of the clearest statistical comparisons in the game.

Houston made 11 three-pointers.
Memphis made seven three-pointers.
Houston scored 33 points from beyond the arc.
Memphis scored 21 points from beyond the arc.

Houston gained 12 points from three-point shooting alone. That difference was larger than the final nine-point margin.

The reported percentages, 30% for Houston and 19% for Memphis, demonstrate how a similar volume of attempts can produce very different results. Memphis had opportunities to improve its scoring total from long range but did not convert enough of them.

This does not mean every missed three-pointer was a poor decision. Shot quality, defensive pressure, clock situation, and the availability of better options all matter. The team totals alone cannot establish whether Memphis selected the wrong shots or simply experienced a cold shooting night.

3. Rebounding favored Houston

Houston collected 57 rebounds compared with Memphis’s 52.

A five-rebound advantage can influence possession volume, especially when a team combines defensive rebounds with second-chance opportunities. Defensive rebounds end an opponent’s possession, while offensive rebounds can create additional scoring chances.

However, total rebounds do not reveal how many offensive rebounds either team collected. Without that breakdown, it would be inaccurate to claim that Houston dominated offensive rebounding specifically.

The defensible conclusion is that Houston finished with more rebounds overall and maintained a modest advantage on the glass.

4. Memphis protected the ball better

Memphis committed 13 turnovers, compared with 16 for Houston.

That is a positive sign for the Grizzlies. They lost possession less frequently despite taking more field-goal attempts and trailing in the final score.

Houston’s three additional turnovers show that its victory did not depend on winning every statistical category. Instead, its better shooting helped compensate for its higher turnover count.

This is an important lesson when evaluating NBA box scores: a team can execute well in one area and still lose because another area has a greater influence on the final result.

5. Houston created more assisted baskets

Houston recorded 29 assists, three more than Memphis’s 26.

Assists can indicate how frequently a team creates baskets through passing rather than individual shot creation. They do not capture every successful pass, screen, cut, or advantage created before a shot.

Still, Houston’s higher assist total, combined with its superior field-goal percentage, supports the conclusion that the Rockets were more productive with their scoring opportunities.

Memphis’s 26 assists show that its offense also generated passing opportunities. The bigger issue was converting enough of those possessions into points.

Houston Rockets Player Stats: Individual Performances

The most notable feature of Houston’s performance was the combined scoring output of Kevin Durant and Alperen Sengun. Both finished with 33 points, giving the Rockets two leading scorers capable of producing offense in different ways.

Houston player statistics table

The following figures reproduce the individual statistics supplied for this game. Only the categories available in the supplied data are included.

Player	Status	Points	Rebounds	Assists	Other recorded stats
Kevin Durant	Starter	33	8	2	Not supplied
Alperen Sengun	Starter	33	9	6	Not supplied
Tari Eason	Starter	17	7	Not supplied	2 steals
Amen Thompson	Starter	8	8	14	Not supplied
Jabari Smith Jr.	Starter	8	8	2	Not supplied
Dorian Finney-Smith	Bench	3	2	2	Not supplied
Jae’Sean Tate	Bench	0	1	1	Not supplied
Clint Capela	Bench	0	3	Not supplied	Not supplied
Josh Okogie	Bench	2	7	2	Not supplied
Reed Sheppard	Bench	4	4	Not supplied	Not supplied

The table highlights three different forms of contribution: high-volume scoring, playmaking, and support through rebounding and defense.

Kevin Durant: 33 points and eight rebounds

Durant led Houston in scoring alongside Sengun, finishing with 33 points and eight rebounds.

A scoring total of 33 points represents a major individual contribution in a 108-point team performance. Durant accounted for approximately 30.6% of Houston’s final score.

His rebounding total also suggests that his contribution extended beyond putting the ball in the basket. Eight rebounds can help a team finish defensive possessions and initiate transition opportunities.

However, the supplied data does not include Durant’s field-goal attempts, shooting splits, turnovers, or plus-minus. Those details would be necessary to calculate his individual shooting efficiency or measure Houston’s scoring margin while he was on the court.

The strongest supported conclusion is that Durant delivered one of Houston’s two leading scoring performances and helped provide the offensive output required to win.

Alperen Sengun: 33 points, nine rebounds, and six assists

Sengun matched Durant’s 33-point total and recorded nine rebounds and six assists.

His statistical contribution covered three major areas:

Scoring: 33 points, tied for the team high.
Rebounding: Nine boards, the highest individual total listed for Houston.
Playmaking: Six assists, the second-highest total among Houston players in the supplied data.

This combination is especially valuable because it gives a team more than one route to a successful possession. A player who can score, rebound, and create opportunities for teammates can influence the game even when the defense focuses on limiting his direct scoring.

Sengun’s nine rebounds led Houston, although Memphis’s individual rebound totals also need to be considered before making claims about the game’s overall rebounding leaders.

His six assists demonstrate that he contributed to teammates’ scoring opportunities as well as his own. Together, his 33 points, nine rebounds, and six assists made him one of the game’s most complete statistical performers.

Amen Thompson: 14 assists and eight rebounds

Thompson recorded eight points, eight rebounds, and 14 assists.

His 14 assists were the highest individual assist total listed for either team. He supplied nearly half of Houston’s 29 team assists, making his playmaking one of the clearest features of the game.

Assists do not tell the entire story of a player’s decision-making, but 14 is a significant total. It indicates that Thompson repeatedly helped create scoring opportunities for teammates.

His eight rebounds added another dimension to his contribution. Even though he scored only eight points, his role was not limited to scoring.

This performance illustrates why judging a point guard solely by points can be misleading. Thompson’s greatest statistical impact came through distributing the ball, involving Houston’s leading scorers, and contributing on the glass.

The available figures do not show his assist-to-turnover ratio because his individual turnovers were not supplied. His 14 assists should therefore be evaluated as a major playmaking contribution, not as a complete measurement of his ball security.

Tari Eason: 17 points, seven rebounds, and two steals

Eason supplied 17 points and seven rebounds while recording two steals.

His scoring matched the total produced by Memphis’s two leading individual scorers, Jaren Jackson Jr. and Santi Aldama. That gave Houston another important source of offense beyond Durant and Sengun.

The two steals also indicate a direct defensive contribution. A steal can end an opponent’s possession and potentially produce a fast-break opportunity, although the box score does not establish whether either steal directly led to points.

Eason’s seven rebounds helped Houston reach its team total of 57. His performance was valuable because it complemented the two leading scorers rather than requiring the offense to depend on them exclusively.

Jabari Smith Jr. and Houston’s supporting lineup

Smith finished with eight points, eight rebounds, and two assists. His rebounding total matched Thompson’s, giving Houston another starter who contributed on the glass.

The bench numbers were more modest. Dorian Finney-Smith had three points, two rebounds, and two assists. Josh Okogie added two points, seven rebounds, and two assists, while Reed Sheppard recorded four points and four rebounds.

Jae’Sean Tate and Clint Capela did not score in the supplied statistics. Tate recorded one rebound and one assist, while Capela collected three rebounds.

These figures should not be interpreted as a full assessment of each player’s performance. Defensive positioning, screening, contesting shots, and other contributions may not appear in a basic box score.

The important team-level point is that Houston’s main offensive burden was carried by Durant and Sengun, with Eason contributing 17 points and Thompson organizing the offense.

Memphis Grizzlies Player Stats: Individual Performances

Memphis had several players who contributed meaningful scoring and playmaking, but its offense lacked the shooting efficiency required to keep pace with Houston in the fourth quarter.

Jaren Jackson Jr. and Santi Aldama led the Grizzlies with 17 points each. Cam Spencer supplied 13 assists, giving Memphis a productive facilitator even though he scored only five points.

Memphis player statistics table

Player	Status	Points	Rebounds	Assists	Other recorded stats
Jaren Jackson Jr.	Starter	17	7	1	1 steal, 2 blocks
Santi Aldama	Starter	17	7	2	Not supplied
Cedric Coward	Starter	8	7	2	1 steal, 1 block
Jaylen Wells	Starter	12	6	Not supplied	Not supplied
Cam Spencer	Starter	5	5	13	Not supplied
Olivier-Maxence Prosper	Bench	8	3	Not supplied	Not supplied
GG Jackson	Bench	14	3	Not supplied	Not supplied
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope	Bench	11	3	Not supplied	Not supplied
John Konchar	Bench	0	3	Not supplied	Not supplied
Vince Williams Jr.	Bench	7	8	5	Not supplied

Jaren Jackson Jr.: 17 points, seven rebounds, and two blocks

Jackson was one of Memphis’s leading scorers, finishing with 17 points and seven rebounds. He also recorded one steal and two blocks.

His defensive statistics are particularly relevant because blocks and steals can disrupt an opponent’s possession without necessarily appearing in traditional scoring summaries. Two blocks provide evidence of rim-protection activity, while a steal represents a direct change of possession.

Jackson’s 17 points were important to Memphis’s offense, but the Grizzlies needed more efficient production across the lineup to overcome Houston’s scoring advantage.

It would be premature to conclude that Jackson’s individual performance was poor because his team lost. His listed numbers show contributions in scoring, rebounding, and defense. The larger issue was that Memphis finished with a 37% field-goal percentage and made only seven three-pointers.

Santi Aldama: 17 points and seven rebounds

Aldama matched Jackson’s 17 points and collected seven rebounds.

His scoring gave Memphis another reliable contributor on the scoreboard. Having two players reach 17 points helped the Grizzlies remain competitive through the opening three quarters.

However, neither Jackson nor Aldama reached the 20-point mark. By comparison, Houston had two players score 33 points and another finish with 17.

That difference in the highest individual scoring totals helps explain Houston’s offensive advantage. The Rockets received 66 points from Durant and Sengun alone, while Memphis’s two leading scorers combined for 34.

Aldama’s seven rebounds also contributed to Memphis’s team total of 52. His performance was productive, but the Grizzlies needed more scoring efficiency from the wider rotation.

Cam Spencer: 13 assists and five rebounds

Spencer finished with five points, five rebounds, and 13 assists.

His 13 assists were the second-highest individual total in the game, one behind Thompson’s 14. Together, the two starting guards demonstrated how important playmaking was to both offenses.

Spencer’s performance also shows why points alone do not capture a player’s complete contribution. Although he scored only five points, his passing helped create opportunities for his teammates.

Memphis recorded 26 assists overall, meaning Spencer was responsible for half of the team’s total.

Still, assists do not guarantee efficient offense. A pass can lead to an open shot, but the player taking that shot must convert it. Memphis’s 37% field-goal percentage suggests that finishing possessions was a major challenge.

Without individual shooting attempts and turnover figures, it is not possible to determine how efficiently Spencer handled every possession. His 13 assists nevertheless stand out as a major positive in Memphis’s box score.

GG Jackson and Kentavious Caldwell-Pope provide bench scoring

Memphis received 14 points from GG Jackson and 11 points from Kentavious Caldwell-Pope.

Their combined 25 points provided meaningful support beyond the starting lineup. Olivier-Maxence Prosper added eight points, while Vince Williams Jr. contributed seven points, eight rebounds, and five assists.

Williams’s line deserves particular attention because he contributed in three statistical categories. His eight rebounds were the highest individual total listed for Memphis, and his five assists helped connect the bench offense.

John Konchar did not score in the supplied figures but recorded three rebounds.

Memphis’s bench scoring was not the central problem. GG Jackson and Caldwell-Pope supplied 25 points between them, while the team as a whole still struggled to convert field-goal attempts consistently.

This distinction matters when evaluating a loss. A team can receive useful production from its reserves and still lose because its overall shooting efficiency, defensive execution, or late-game performance is insufficient.

Who Were the Top Performers in the Game?

The leading performers can be identified by looking at individual production alongside the needs of each team.

Performance category	Player	Team	Statistic
Joint leading scorer	Kevin Durant	Houston	33 points
Joint leading scorer	Alperen Sengun	Houston	33 points
Leading assist provider	Amen Thompson	Houston	14 assists
Second-highest assist total	Cam Spencer	Memphis	13 assists
Leading Houston rebounder	Alperen Sengun	Houston	9 rebounds
Leading Memphis rebounder	Vince Williams Jr.	Memphis	8 rebounds
Memphis joint leading scorer	Jaren Jackson Jr.	Memphis	17 points
Memphis joint leading scorer	Santi Aldama	Memphis	17 points
Recorded defensive highlight	Jaren Jackson Jr.	Memphis	2 blocks
Recorded steals contribution	Tari Eason	Houston	2 steals

These categories describe different kinds of impact rather than a universal player ranking.

Durant and Sengun led the scoring. Thompson and Spencer led the playmaking numbers. Sengun and Williams topped the listed rebound totals for their respective teams. Jackson contributed two blocks, while Eason recorded two steals.

A more complete player-efficiency comparison would require field-goal attempts, turnovers, personal fouls, minutes played, and other box-score information that is not included in the supplied figures.

Why Did Houston Beat Memphis?

The Memphis Grizzlies vs Houston Rockets match player stats point to four major factors behind Houston’s victory: shooting efficiency, three-point production, late-game execution, and balanced contributions from its leading players.

1. Houston converted a higher percentage of its shots

Houston made 41 of 92 field-goal attempts, while Memphis made 39 of 105.

That means Houston made two more field goals despite taking 13 fewer attempts. The difference reflects the Rockets’ greater efficiency on their recorded field-goal opportunities.

Memphis’s higher attempt total may reflect additional possessions, offensive rebounds, or differences in how each team constructed its offense. The supplied team totals do not establish the precise cause.

What they do establish is that Memphis did not turn its larger number of attempts into a larger number of made shots.

In close games, that gap can be decisive. A team that shoots more frequently still needs to convert those opportunities at a competitive rate.

2. The three-point gap was decisive

Houston made four more three-pointers than Memphis.

Because each successful three-pointer is worth three points, those additional makes created a 12-point advantage in three-point scoring. That advantage exceeded Houston’s nine-point final margin.

Memphis attempted the same number of threes but made only 19% of them, compared with Houston’s 30%.

This was one of the clearest differences in the box score. Houston did not need a larger three-point attempt volume to benefit from long-range scoring. It simply converted more of its attempts.

3. Houston delivered in the fourth quarter

The game was still close after three quarters. Memphis led by three at halftime, and Houston entered the fourth quarter trailing by one.

Houston then scored 32 points in the final period, its highest-scoring quarter of the game. Memphis managed 22.

A 10-point advantage in one quarter was enough to turn a one-point deficit into a nine-point victory.

Late-game scoring can reflect many factors, including shot-making, defensive adjustments, fatigue, turnover management, and the quality of possessions. The available data does not isolate the contribution of each factor.

The score progression does, however, show precisely when Houston created its decisive separation.

4. Houston’s leading scorers delivered in combination

Durant and Sengun combined for 66 points, accounting for approximately 61.1% of Houston’s total.

That is a substantial scoring contribution from two players. Eason added 17 points, bringing the combined total for Houston’s three leading scorers to 83 points.

Memphis’s two leading scorers combined for 34 points. Its next-highest listed scorer was GG Jackson with 14, followed by Caldwell-Pope with 11.

Memphis received contributions from several players, but Houston’s two leading scorers produced almost twice as many points as the Grizzlies’ two leading scorers combined.

That contrast helps explain why Houston could overcome its higher turnover total.

What Memphis Did Well Despite Losing

The final result should not obscure the areas where Memphis performed competitively.

First, Memphis kept the game close for three quarters. The Grizzlies led at halftime and entered the final period only one point behind. Their loss was not the result of an early blowout.

Second, Memphis committed fewer turnovers. Its 13 turnovers compared with Houston’s 16 show that the Grizzlies gave away possession less frequently.

Third, Memphis recorded more blocks. The Grizzlies had five blocks to Houston’s three. That suggests they recorded more direct shot rejections, although block totals alone cannot measure overall defensive effectiveness.

Fourth, Memphis recorded 26 assists. Spencer’s 13 assists and contributions from other players indicate that the offense generated passing opportunities.

The main challenge was turning those positive elements into enough points. A team can protect possession and produce defensive stops but still lose if its shooting efficiency is substantially lower than its opponent’s.

Memphis’s 19% three-point percentage stands out as the most obvious area of concern in this particular box score.

What the Statistics Mean for Future Matchups

One game provides useful evidence about performance on a particular night, but it should not be treated as proof of a permanent team strength or weakness.

The following observations are reasonable starting points for evaluating future games.

For Houston: maintain efficient offense

Houston’s 45% field-goal percentage and 30% three-point percentage were clear advantages in this matchup.

The next step is to determine whether the team can maintain that efficiency across multiple games. A single game cannot establish a long-term shooting trend.

Future box scores should be compared for:

Field-goal and three-point percentages.
Scoring contributions from Durant, Sengun, and supporting players.
Turnover totals relative to assists.
Offensive and defensive rebounding.
Fourth-quarter scoring and defensive performance.

Houston’s 16 turnovers also represent an area worth monitoring. Although the Rockets won, repeated turnovers could become more costly against opponents that shoot efficiently.

For Memphis: improve conversion without abandoning good process

Memphis’s 105 field-goal attempts were not enough to compensate for its 37% shooting.

A useful review would examine whether those attempts came from open three-pointers, contested perimeter shots, difficult finishes near the basket, or other situations. The supplied summary does not include shot locations or quality, so it cannot answer those questions directly.

The Grizzlies would benefit from a more detailed review of shooting percentages, possession outcomes, and offensive-rebound opportunities before any specific tactical change is recommended.

It would also be worth tracking whether Jackson and Aldama can generate more efficient scoring performances and whether the team can turn Spencer’s playmaking into a higher percentage of made shots.

Why season averages matter

A single performance should be compared with a player’s season averages before drawing conclusions about improvement or decline.

For example, 33 points may represent an exceptional scoring night for one player and a more typical performance for another. Similarly, 19% three-point shooting in one game does not prove that a team is a poor long-range shooting team across the season.

Reliable analysis separates three things:

The observed result: What happened in this game.
The possible explanation: Which statistical differences may have contributed.
The broader trend: Whether the same pattern appears repeatedly.

This approach avoids treating one result as definitive proof of a team’s overall identity.

How to Read NBA Player Statistics Correctly

Understanding a box score means looking beyond the biggest numbers. The following measurements help explain why individual performances and team results can differ.

Points

Points measure a player’s direct scoring output. Durant and Sengun each scored 33 points, making them the joint leading scorers.

However, points alone do not show how many attempts a player needed. A complete scoring-efficiency assessment should include field goals, three-pointers, free throws, and shooting percentages.

Rebounds

Rebounds measure a player’s recovery of the ball after a missed shot. They are commonly divided into offensive and defensive rebounds.

Sengun recorded nine rebounds for Houston, while Williams led the listed Memphis players with eight. Because the supplied figures do not separate offensive and defensive rebounds, they cannot establish which players created the most second-chance opportunities.

Assists

An assist is credited when a player’s pass directly leads to a made basket under the official scoring rules.

Thompson recorded 14 assists and Spencer had 13. These totals highlight their importance as playmakers, but assists should be considered alongside turnovers, shooting efficiency, and the team’s overall offensive output.

Steals and blocks

Steals record defensive actions that directly take possession away from an opponent. Blocks record defensive actions that deflect or stop an opponent’s shot.

Memphis recorded nine steals and five blocks. Houston recorded nine steals and three blocks.

The equal steal totals show that neither team had an advantage in this category. Memphis recorded two more blocks, but Houston still won because defensive statistics must be considered alongside offensive performance.

Plus-minus

Plus-minus measures the difference between a team’s points scored and points allowed while a specific player is on the court.

A positive figure means the team outscored its opponent during that player’s on-court minutes. A negative figure means the opponent outscored the player’s team during those minutes.

Plus-minus is influenced by teammates, opponents, substitutions, and game situations. It should not be used alone to rank players, and individual plus-minus figures were not included in the supplied data.

Data Accuracy and Important Limitations

The statistics presented in this article are based on the game information and player figures supplied for the January 27, 2026, matchup.

Several limitations are worth noting:

Individual field-goal attempts and shooting percentages were not supplied for every player.
Individual minutes played, turnovers, personal fouls, and plus-minus figures were not provided.
Offensive and defensive rebounds were not separated.
The supplied game summary identifies the final score, team totals, and selected player statistics, but it does not provide a complete play-by-play account.
The figures support a comparison of this game, not a definitive assessment of either team’s entire season.

There is also an important distinction between the reported team percentages and calculations made from the supplied totals. Houston’s 41 made field goals out of 92 attempts equate to approximately 44.6%, while Memphis’s 39 out of 105 equate to approximately 37.1%. These figures round to the reported 45% and 37%, respectively.

Using transparent calculations makes the analysis easier to verify and prevents small rounding differences from being mistaken for errors.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Memphis Grizzlies vs Houston Rockets game on January 27, 2026?

The Houston Rockets won 108-99 against the Memphis Grizzlies at Toyota Center in Houston, Texas. Houston outscored Memphis 32-22 in the fourth quarter to secure the nine-point victory.

2. Who scored the most points in the game?

Kevin Durant and Alperen Sengun were the joint leading scorers, with 33 points each for Houston. Memphis’s leading scorers were Jaren Jackson Jr. and Santi Aldama, who recorded 17 points apiece.

3. Who recorded the most assists?

Amen Thompson led all listed players with 14 assists for Houston. Memphis’s Cam Spencer recorded 13 assists, making him the second-highest assist provider in the supplied statistics.

4. Which team shot better from three-point range?

Houston shot better from three-point range, making 11 of 37 attempts for a reported 30%. Memphis made seven of 37 attempts for 19%. Houston’s four additional three-pointers produced a 12-point advantage from beyond the arc.

5. Why did Houston win despite committing more turnovers?

Houston committed 16 turnovers compared with Memphis’s 13, but it shot more efficiently. The Rockets made 45% of their field goals compared with Memphis’s 37%, collected five more rebounds, and scored 10 more points in the fourth quarter.

6. How many rebounds did Alperen Sengun record?

Sengun recorded nine rebounds, the highest individual rebound total listed for Houston. Memphis’s Vince Williams Jr. recorded eight rebounds, the highest individual total listed for the Grizzlies.

Conclusion

The Memphis Grizzlies vs Houston Rockets matchup on January 27, 2026, demonstrated how shooting efficiency and late-game execution can determine a closely contested NBA game. Houston won 108-99 after trailing at halftime and entering the fourth quarter one point behind.

Kevin Durant and Alperen Sengun led the Rockets with 33 points each, while Amen Thompson’s 14 assists helped facilitate the offense. Tari Eason added 17 points, giving Houston another productive scorer. Memphis received 17 points apiece from Jaren Jackson Jr. and Santi Aldama, while Cam Spencer contributed 13 assists.

The team statistics explain the difference. Houston shot 45% from the field and 30% from three-point range, compared with Memphis’s 37% and 19%, respectively. The Rockets also collected 57 rebounds to Memphis’s 52. Although Memphis committed fewer turnovers and recorded more blocks, Houston’s superior shooting and 32-point fourth quarter proved decisive.

The most important takeaway is that neither scoring totals nor individual statistics tell the entire story in isolation. The strongest analysis combines player performances, team efficiency, possession outcomes, and the progression of the game. Together, these figures provide a clearer understanding of how Houston earned the win and why Memphis struggled to keep pace late in the contest.