san antonio spurs vs oklahoma city thunder match player stats
The san antonio spurs vs oklahoma city thunder match player stats from Game 7 of the 2026 Western Conference Finals tell a much deeper story than the final score alone. San Antonio defeated Oklahoma City 111-103 at Paycom Center on May 31, 2026, closing out the series 4-3 and earning a decisive road victory in the final game. Victor Wembanyama led the Spurs with 22 points, while Shai Gilgeous-Alexander produced a spectacular 35-point performance for the Thunder. Yet the most important statistical details are found in the contrast between individual production, three-point shooting, ball movement, turnovers, and the way the teams scored across four quarters.
For anyone searching for the san antonio spurs vs oklahoma city thunder match player stats, the headline numbers are straightforward. San Antonio scored 111 points on 45 percent shooting, made 17 of 40 three-point attempts, collected 40 rebounds, and finished with 21 assists. Oklahoma City also shot 45 percent from the field, but the Thunder made only 12 of 35 three-point attempts. That difference from beyond the arc became one of the defining statistical features of the game.
The result was especially notable because Oklahoma City entered the matchup with a 64-18 regular season record, compared with San Antonio’s 62-20 mark. The Spurs nevertheless won the most important game of the series, overcoming the Thunder on their home floor.
San Antonio Spurs vs Oklahoma City Thunder Match Player Stats
The clearest starting point is the individual scoring comparison.
Victor Wembanyama was San Antonio’s leading scorer with 22 points. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander was Oklahoma City’s leading scorer with 35 points, finishing 12 of 21 from the field, 2 of 5 from three-point range, and 9 of 11 from the free throw line.
Gilgeous-Alexander’s 35 points represented a major share of Oklahoma City’s offensive output. The Thunder scored 103 points, meaning their leading scorer accounted for roughly 34 percent of the team’s total.
Wembanyama’s 22 points represented about 20 percent of San Antonio’s 111 points.
That difference is useful because it shows how the two offenses were distributed. Oklahoma City leaned heavily on its primary scorer, while San Antonio’s winning total was not dependent on one player producing a huge individual scoring number.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander’s 35-point performance
Gilgeous-Alexander’s line was the most productive individual scoring performance in the game.
His statistical line:
- 35 points
- 12-of-21 field goals
- 2-of-5 three-pointers
- 9-of-11 free throws
- 4 rebounds
- 9 assists
- 3 turnovers
- 3 steals
- 1 block
The first thing that stands out is his efficiency inside the overall shooting profile. He converted 12 of 21 field goal attempts, which works out to approximately 57.1 percent from the field.
He also made 9 of 11 free throws, giving him an additional source of scoring when Oklahoma City could not generate points solely through field goals.
His 9 assists are equally important.
A box score can make a 35-point performance look like an individual scoring story, but Gilgeous-Alexander was also responsible for creating opportunities for teammates. His nine assists were part of Oklahoma City’s 23 total assists.
At the same time, he committed three turnovers. That number is not automatically a negative in isolation because high-usage offensive players generally handle the ball frequently. In a Game 7, however, every possession carries additional importance.
His three steals also demonstrate that his influence was not limited to scoring and playmaking.
Victor Wembanyama’s role in the Spurs’ win
Wembanyama finished as San Antonio’s leading scorer with 22 points.
That number was lower than Gilgeous-Alexander’s 35, but the final result demonstrates why individual scoring totals should not be used as the sole measure of impact.
San Antonio scored 111 points and won by eight.
The Spurs also produced 17 three-pointers, compared with 12 for Oklahoma City. Their five-made-three advantage created 15 additional points from long range before accounting for any other differences in shot value.
Wembanyama’s role therefore needs to be viewed within the team’s overall offensive structure. San Antonio did not need its leading scorer to match the Thunder’s leading scorer point for point.
Instead, the Spurs found enough total production to exceed Oklahoma City’s output.
That distinction is one of the most useful lessons from the box score.
Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
San Antonio’s 111-103 victory was built across all four quarters rather than through one enormous scoring explosion.
| Quarter | Spurs | Thunder |
| 1st | 32 | 25 |
| 2nd | 24 | 28 |
| 3rd | 24 | 24 |
| 4th | 31 | 26 |
| Final | 111 | 103 |
San Antonio opened the game by scoring 32 points while holding Oklahoma City to 25.
That seven-point first-quarter advantage immediately created a foundation for the Spurs.
The Thunder responded in the second quarter, outscoring San Antonio 28-24. That reduced the gap by four points, but it did not completely erase the Spurs’ early advantage.
The third quarter was perfectly even at 24-24.
That meant the game entered the final quarter with San Antonio still holding its earlier advantage.
The fourth quarter ultimately separated the teams again. San Antonio scored 31 points, while Oklahoma City scored 26.
The five-point fourth-quarter advantage was enough to protect the lead and secure the championship-series victory.
Why the first and fourth quarters mattered
The quarter scores reveal an important pattern.
San Antonio won the first quarter by seven and the fourth quarter by five. Those two periods created a 12-point combined advantage.
Oklahoma City won the second quarter by four.
The third quarter was even.
This is a good example of why a final score alone can hide the structure of a game. Oklahoma City was competitive for long stretches, but San Antonio controlled the two quarters that produced the largest differences.
The Spurs did not need to dominate every period.
They needed to win enough possessions and enough scoring stretches to finish ahead.
Team Shooting Comparison
The shooting numbers are among the strongest clues for understanding the result.
| Category | Spurs | Thunder |
| Field Goals | 40-88 | 37-83 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 45% | 45% |
| Three-Pointers | 17-40 | 12-35 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 43% | 34% |
| Free Throws | 14-19 | 17-22 |
At first glance, the field goal percentage is identical.
Both teams shot 45 percent.
That makes the three-point difference even more important.
San Antonio made 17 three-pointers on 40 attempts, a 43 percent rate.
Oklahoma City made 12 on 35 attempts, a 34 percent rate.
The Spurs therefore made five more three-pointers.
Because each made three-pointer is worth three points, those five additional makes represented a 15-point difference in three-point scoring.
San Antonio scored 51 points from three-point field goals.
Oklahoma City scored 36.
That is a 15-point advantage for the Spurs from beyond the arc.
The final margin was eight points.
That does not mean the entire eight-point victory can be attributed to three-point shooting because basketball outcomes are created by multiple factors. However, the comparison shows just how significant San Antonio’s perimeter efficiency was.
Field goal volume
San Antonio attempted 88 field goals compared with Oklahoma City’s 83.
The Spurs therefore took five more shots from the field.
They made 40 of those attempts, while the Thunder made 37.
The combination of greater field goal volume and stronger three-point conversion helped San Antonio build its 111-point total.
Oklahoma City shot the ball at the same overall field goal percentage, but that percentage does not tell the entire story because not all field goal attempts carry the same value.
This is why looking only at overall field goal percentage can be misleading.
Two teams can both shoot 45 percent while generating very different scoring totals depending on how many of those attempts come from three-point range.
The Three-Point Battle Was a Major Difference
The most obvious statistical separation between the teams came from three-point shooting.
San Antonio:
- 40 attempts
- 17 makes
- 43 percent
- 51 total points from three
Oklahoma City:
- 35 attempts
- 12 makes
- 34 percent
- 36 total points from three
The Spurs made 42.5 percent of their three-point attempts based on the raw 17-of-40 figure. The supplied game data rounds the team percentage to 43 percent.
The Thunder converted 12 of 35, or approximately 34.3 percent.
This was not simply a matter of San Antonio attempting more threes.
The Spurs also converted them at a higher rate.
That combination is especially difficult for an opponent to overcome.
A team can sometimes compensate for poor three-point shooting by attacking the rim, creating free throws, dominating the offensive glass, or limiting turnovers. Oklahoma City did receive 22 free throw attempts and made 17, compared with San Antonio’s 19 attempts and 14 makes.
The Thunder therefore had a slight free throw advantage.
But the 15-point difference in made three-point scoring remained a major statistical counterweight.
Free Throws and Scoring Efficiency
Free throw shooting was another area where Oklahoma City performed well.
The Thunder went 17 of 22 from the line, or approximately 77 percent.
San Antonio went 14 of 19, or approximately 74 percent.
Oklahoma City therefore scored three more points from free throws.
This is an important counterpoint to the three-point numbers.
The Spurs did not win every shooting category.
The Thunder actually scored more free throw points.
The final outcome came from the combined effect of all scoring sources rather than a clean statistical sweep.
When examining a close playoff game, this type of balance matters.
San Antonio’s advantage from three-point range outweighed Oklahoma City’s advantage at the free throw line.
Rebounding Comparison
The rebounding numbers were relatively close.
San Antonio recorded 40 rebounds.
Oklahoma City recorded 38.
That gave the Spurs a two-rebound advantage.
A two-rebound difference is not overwhelming, but it still indicates that San Antonio did not lose the possession battle on the glass.
In a game decided by eight points, even small statistical advantages can become meaningful when combined.
The Spurs had:
- 40 rebounds
- 21 assists
- 12 turnovers
- 9 steals
- 2 blocks
The Thunder had:
- 38 rebounds
- 23 assists
- 13 turnovers
- 9 steals
- 5 blocks
The Thunder actually recorded more assists and blocks.
That is important.
San Antonio did not win because it dominated every traditional box-score category.
Instead, it won through a combination of scoring efficiency, perimeter shooting, rebounding, and the ability to generate enough offense across the game.
Assists and Ball Movement
Oklahoma City finished with 23 assists compared with 21 for San Antonio.
That means the Thunder had a two-assist advantage.
Gilgeous-Alexander contributed nine of those assists.
His 35-point, nine-assist combination shows that he was heavily involved in creating the Thunder’s offense.
The Spurs’ 21 assists still indicate a strong level of shared offensive production, particularly considering the team scored 111 points.
One useful way to interpret these numbers is to avoid treating assists as a simple measure of which offense was better.
Assists describe how made baskets were created, but they do not fully explain shooting efficiency or the value of each made shot.
San Antonio’s superior three-point output is the clearest example.
The Spurs recorded fewer assists than Oklahoma City but still scored eight more points.
That shows that assist totals alone cannot explain offensive success.
Turnovers and Possession Management
Turnovers were close.
San Antonio committed 12.
Oklahoma City committed 13.
The difference was only one turnover.
The teams also recorded the same number of steals, with nine each.
That suggests neither side created a huge defensive advantage through forcing turnovers.
San Antonio’s one-turnover edge is modest, but in a Game 7 it matters because every lost possession removes an opportunity to score.
The key point is that the Spurs did not give away significantly more possessions while also enjoying a strong shooting night from three.
That is a favorable combination.
The Thunder, meanwhile, did enough to remain within striking distance but could not turn their defensive activity into a decisive possession advantage.
Blocks and Defensive Activity
Oklahoma City recorded five blocks.
San Antonio recorded two.
The Thunder therefore held a clear advantage in blocked shots.
However, blocks did not translate into a lower final score for San Antonio.
The Spurs still scored 111 points.
This is a useful reminder that defensive statistics should be interpreted in context.
A team can block more shots and still lose because defense involves much more than rim protection.
Three-point defense, defensive rebounding, transition defense, turnovers, fouls, and overall shot quality can all influence the final result.
The Thunder’s five blocks demonstrate strong activity around the basket, but San Antonio’s offense found enough ways to produce points anyway.
A Closer Look at Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
Gilgeous-Alexander’s performance deserves separate attention because it was one of the defining individual statistical stories of the game.
He scored 35 points on 12-of-21 shooting.
That is approximately 57 percent from the field.
He also converted two of five three-point attempts and nine of 11 free throws.
His total scoring came from multiple areas rather than relying entirely on one shot type.
The nine assists add another dimension.
He was not merely finishing possessions. He was also creating them.
His four rebounds were a smaller part of the overall performance, while three steals and one block showed defensive involvement.
The three turnovers are worth noting but should not overshadow the broader statistical line.
A 35-point and nine-assist performance in a conference finals Game 7 represents an enormous offensive workload.
The challenge for Oklahoma City was that this excellent individual output was not enough to overcome San Antonio’s broader team scoring profile.
A Closer Look at Victor Wembanyama
Wembanyama led San Antonio with 22 points.
The most important observation is that his 22-point total came within a winning team performance that reached 111 points.
That suggests the Spurs had enough complementary scoring to avoid requiring a single player to dominate the scoring column.
This distinction can be especially important when evaluating playoff basketball.
A team may have the highest individual scorer and still lose.
That is exactly what happened in this matchup.
Gilgeous-Alexander outscored Wembanyama by 13 points, but San Antonio outscored Oklahoma City by eight points overall.
The difference illustrates the value of team-wide offensive contribution.
For analysts and fans, this is one of the strongest reasons to examine the complete box score rather than focusing exclusively on the leading scorers.
What the Box Score Says About the Game
Several conclusions emerge when the numbers are considered together.
1. San Antonio won despite having the lower-scoring star
Wembanyama scored 22.
Gilgeous-Alexander scored 35.
Yet San Antonio won by eight.
The Spurs therefore received enough collective production to overcome a substantial individual scoring disadvantage.
2. Three-point shooting was a major separator
San Antonio made 17 threes.
Oklahoma City made 12.
The Spurs’ five additional made threes produced a 15-point advantage from beyond the arc.
3. Overall field goal percentage was identical
Both teams shot 45 percent.
That makes the distribution of those attempts especially important.
4. Oklahoma City had more assists and blocks
The Thunder finished with 23 assists and five blocks.
The Spurs had 21 assists and two blocks.
Those categories favored Oklahoma City.
5. San Antonio protected the ball slightly better
The Spurs committed 12 turnovers.
The Thunder committed 13.
The difference was small, but it favored the winning team.
6. Rebounding was close
San Antonio held a 40-38 edge.
Neither team completely controlled the glass.
Why the Final Score Can Be Misleading
A 111-103 score might suggest San Antonio was comfortably better.
The quarter-by-quarter numbers tell a more nuanced story.
The Thunder won the second quarter.
The third quarter was tied.
Gilgeous-Alexander produced 35 points.
Oklahoma City also had more assists and blocks.
The game was therefore not defined by one team dominating every statistical area.
Instead, San Antonio consistently maintained enough advantages to finish ahead.
The first quarter gave the Spurs a seven-point cushion.
The fourth quarter added another five points to that advantage.
Those two periods effectively shaped the game.
This is one of the most useful lessons for anyone studying playoff box scores: a final score is an endpoint, not an explanation.
San Antonio’s Road Victory in Game 7
The game was played at Paycom Center in Oklahoma City.
The listed attendance was 18,203.
That setting makes the result even more significant from a competitive standpoint.
San Antonio entered Game 7 needing to win on the road to claim the series.
The Spurs did exactly that, scoring 111 points against a Thunder team that had posted a 64-18 regular season record.
San Antonio’s regular season record was 62-20.
The two teams were therefore separated by only two wins during the regular season.
The Game 7 result provided a clear example of how regular-season records do not determine a playoff series.
The Thunder had home court for the decisive game, but the Spurs finished with the stronger performance when the series was on the line.
Spurs vs Thunder Team Comparison
| Statistical Category | San Antonio Spurs | Oklahoma City Thunder |
| Final Score | 111 | 103 |
| Field Goals | 40-88 | 37-83 |
| FG Percentage | 45% | 45% |
| Three-Pointers | 17-40 | 12-35 |
| 3PT Percentage | 43% | 34% |
| Free Throws | 14-19 | 17-22 |
| Rebounds | 40 | 38 |
| Assists | 21 | 23 |
| Turnovers | 12 | 13 |
| Steals | 9 | 9 |
| Blocks | 2 | 5 |
This table demonstrates why the matchup cannot be reduced to one statistic.
San Antonio had the edge in:
- Final score
- Three-point makes
- Three-point percentage
- Field goal attempts
- Rebounds
- Turnover control
Oklahoma City had the edge in:
- Free throws made
- Free throw percentage
- Assists
- Blocks
Steals were equal.
Overall field goal percentage was also equal.
That balance makes San Antonio’s 111-103 victory particularly informative.
The Spurs did not win because Oklahoma City played poorly in every area.
They won because the areas where they had an advantage produced enough value to overcome the Thunder’s strengths.
The Statistical Meaning of a Five-Three Advantage
One of the simplest ways to understand this game is to focus on made threes.
San Antonio made five more three-pointers.
If every other scoring category were identical, five additional three-point makes would be worth 15 points.
The final margin was eight points.
Of course, actual basketball scoring does not work as a controlled experiment, so it would be inaccurate to say that the five additional threes alone caused the victory.
However, the comparison establishes the scale of San Antonio’s perimeter advantage.
The Spurs did not merely shoot slightly better from three.
They created a meaningful difference in both volume and accuracy.
That is one of the strongest statistical explanations for the final result.
The Importance of Team Scoring Distribution
Another major takeaway is the difference between star scoring and team scoring.
Gilgeous-Alexander scored 35 of Oklahoma City’s 103 points.
Wembanyama scored 22 of San Antonio’s 111.
The Thunder’s leading scorer produced 13 more points than the Spurs’ leading scorer.
Yet San Antonio scored eight more points as a team.
This means the rest of the Spurs’ scoring group collectively supplied enough production to reverse the individual scoring disadvantage.
For readers analyzing player stats, this is a crucial distinction.
The highest scorer is not necessarily the player on the winning team.
And the player with the biggest individual statistical line is not automatically responsible for the overall result.
Basketball is a five-player game, and the team box score provides context that individual statistics cannot provide by themselves.
Game 7 Context: Spurs 4, Thunder 3
The series ended 4-3 in San Antonio’s favor.
That detail matters because a Game 7 is fundamentally different from an early regular-season matchup.
There is no later game to correct mistakes.
Every possession becomes part of the final result.
The Spurs entered the decisive contest with a 62-20 regular-season record.
The Thunder entered with a 64-18 record.
Both teams had demonstrated elite regular-season performance.
The final game therefore represented a meeting between two teams that had each won at least 62 games.
San Antonio’s ability to score 111 points in Oklahoma City while holding the Thunder to 103 proved decisive.
What Fans Should Look For When Reading Player Stats
A useful approach to reading a playoff box score is to move beyond points.
Start with scoring, but then ask five additional questions:
- How efficiently did the player score?
- How many possessions did the player create for teammates?
- Did the player protect the ball?
- Did the player contribute defensively?
- How did the individual performance fit into the team’s overall strategy?
Gilgeous-Alexander provides a strong example.
His 35 points are immediately impressive.
His 12-of-21 shooting makes the scoring more meaningful.
His nine assists reveal his playmaking role.
His three steals and one block show defensive activity.
His three turnovers provide additional context.
Similarly, Wembanyama’s 22 points should not be evaluated in isolation.
His scoring must be considered within a Spurs offense that produced 111 points and made 17 three-pointers.
Common Mistakes When Comparing Spurs and Thunder Stats
Focusing only on the top scorer
This would make it easy to conclude that Oklahoma City had the better offensive performance.
The final score disproves that conclusion.
Looking only at field goal percentage
Both teams shot 45 percent.
If the analysis stopped there, it would miss one of the biggest differences in the game.
Ignoring three-point volume
The Spurs attempted 40 threes compared with 35 for the Thunder.
The Spurs also converted five more.
Treating blocks as the complete measure of defense
Oklahoma City had five blocks to San Antonio’s two, but still allowed 111 points.
Blocks are valuable, but they are only one defensive statistic.
Ignoring turnovers because the difference was small
The Spurs committed 12 turnovers and the Thunder 13.
One possession may seem insignificant, but in a Game 7 decided by eight points, small margins matter.
How to Analyze This Matchup More Accurately
For readers who want a more complete understanding of the game, the following process works well.
Step 1: Start with the final score
San Antonio won 111-103.
This establishes the outcome but does not explain it.
Step 2: Compare team shooting
Both teams shot 45 percent from the field.
Then compare three-point shooting.
That immediately reveals a major difference.
Step 3: Examine individual leaders
Wembanyama led San Antonio with 22.
Gilgeous-Alexander led Oklahoma City with 35.
The difference tells you that individual scoring did not determine the winner.
Step 4: Check possession-related statistics
Rebounds were 40-38 in favor of San Antonio.
Turnovers were 12-13 in favor of San Antonio.
These were modest but useful advantages.
Step 5: Review assists and defensive statistics
Oklahoma City had more assists and blocks.
That shows the Thunder had legitimate strengths despite losing.
Step 6: Compare quarter scores
San Antonio’s seven-point first-quarter advantage and five-point fourth-quarter advantage explain how the Spurs built and protected their lead.
This process creates a more reliable interpretation than simply listing points.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the leading scorer in the Spurs vs Thunder Game 7?
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander was the leading scorer for the game with 35 points. He shot 12-of-21 from the field, made 2-of-5 three-pointers, and went 9-of-11 from the free throw line.
How many points did Victor Wembanyama score?
Victor Wembanyama led the Spurs with 22 points in the Game 7 victory.
What was the final score of Spurs vs Thunder Game 7?
San Antonio defeated Oklahoma City 111-103 at Paycom Center on May 31, 2026.
How did the Spurs win despite Shai Gilgeous-Alexander scoring 35 points?
San Antonio received stronger overall team scoring and had a major three-point advantage. The Spurs made 17 three-pointers compared with 12 for Oklahoma City and also held small advantages in rebounds and turnovers.
How many three-pointers did each team make?
San Antonio made 17 of 40 three-point attempts. Oklahoma City made 12 of 35.
Who won the Western Conference Finals series?
The San Antonio Spurs won the series 4-3 after winning Game 7 by a score of 111-103.
Conclusion
The san antonio spurs vs oklahoma city thunder match player stats from Game 7 show why basketball analysis needs more than a quick look at the leading scorers.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander delivered the biggest individual scoring performance with 35 points, nine assists, four rebounds, three steals, and one block. His 12-of-21 shooting and 9-of-11 free throw shooting made his offensive performance highly productive.
Victor Wembanyama led San Antonio with 22 points, but the Spurs did not need him to match Gilgeous-Alexander’s scoring total. Instead, San Antonio produced a balanced team result, scoring 111 points while shooting 45 percent from the field.
The most important statistical separator was three-point shooting. San Antonio made 17 of 40 attempts, compared with Oklahoma City’s 12 of 35. The five additional three-point makes represented a 15-point difference in perimeter scoring.
The Spurs also held narrow advantages in rebounds and turnovers. They collected 40 rebounds to Oklahoma City’s 38 and committed 12 turnovers compared with 13 for the Thunder.
Oklahoma City had clear strengths of its own. The Thunder recorded more assists, more blocks, and more made free throws. Their 23 assists, five blocks, and 17 made free throws demonstrate that the loss was not caused by an across-the-board statistical collapse.
The quarter scores provide the final layer of context. San Antonio won the first quarter 32-25 and the fourth quarter 31-26. Oklahoma City won the second 28-24, while the third ended level at 24-24.
In the end, the Spurs found enough advantages in the areas that most directly affected the scoreboard. They won 111-103 on Oklahoma City’s home floor, captured the series 4-3, and completed the decisive Game 7 with a performance that demonstrates the difference between individual brilliance and complete team production.
For anyone studying this matchup, the biggest lesson is simple: the box score becomes far more useful when points, efficiency, shooting distribution, possession control, and quarter-by-quarter performance are considered together.
