76ers vs Lakers Match Player Stats
The 76ers vs lakers match player stats from the February 6, 2026 matchup tell the story of a game that changed dramatically after halftime. The Los Angeles Lakers defeated the Philadelphia 76ers 119-115 at Crypto.com Arena after overcoming an early deficit and responding to the loss of Luka Doncic during the first half. Austin Reaves became the decisive scoring force with 35 points in only 25 minutes, while Joel Embiid also scored 35 points for Philadelphia. Tyrese Maxey added 26 points and 13 assists, and LeBron James finished with 17 points and 10 assists.
The final score does not fully explain how competitive this game was. Philadelphia led after each of the first two quarters and entered halftime with a 59-51 advantage. The Lakers then produced 34 points in both the third and fourth quarters, turning an eight-point halftime deficit into a four-point victory. The result also completed a 2-0 season series sweep for Los Angeles over Philadelphia.
For anyone researching 76ers vs lakers match player stats, this game is particularly useful because the box score reveals several different stories at once. Embiid and Maxey carried Philadelphia offensively, VJ Edgecombe delivered a strong all-around performance, and the 76ers generated 15 steals. Yet Los Angeles dominated the rebounding battle 42-28 and received an extraordinary scoring performance from Reaves.
76ers vs lakers match player stats at a glance
The game was played at Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles in front of 18,731 fans. Philadelphia entered the contest with a 29-22 record and a 14-9 road mark, while Los Angeles was 31-19 overall and 13-8 at home.
| Category | Philadelphia 76ers | Los Angeles Lakers |
| Final Score | 115 | 119 |
| First Quarter | 27 | 21 |
| Second Quarter | 32 | 30 |
| Third Quarter | 28 | 34 |
| Fourth Quarter | 28 | 34 |
| Field Goals | 45-84 | 44-79 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 54% | 56% |
| Three-Pointers | 5-24 | 9-25 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 21% | 36% |
| Free Throws | 20-23 | 22-27 |
| Free Throw Percentage | 87% | 81% |
| Rebounds | 28 | 42 |
| Assists | 29 | 27 |
| Turnovers | 14 | 22 |
| Steals | 15 | 8 |
| Blocks | 3 | 4 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 4 | 10 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 24 | 32 |
| Team Fouls | 22 | 17 |
The numbers immediately show why this was not simply a matter of which team shot better.
Philadelphia actually took care of the ball much better, committing only 14 turnovers compared with 22 by Los Angeles. The 76ers also recorded 15 steals, nearly twice the Lakers’ eight.
However, Los Angeles created a major advantage on the glass. The Lakers collected 42 total rebounds, including 10 offensive rebounds, while Philadelphia had only 28 total rebounds and four offensive boards.
That extra possession value mattered enormously in a four-point game.
How the game changed after halftime
Philadelphia appeared to have control during the first half.
The 76ers scored 27 points in the opening quarter and 32 in the second, while the Lakers managed 21 and 30 respectively. Philadelphia therefore held a 59-51 halftime advantage.
The Lakers responded immediately after halftime.
Los Angeles scored 34 points in the third quarter and another 34 in the fourth. Philadelphia managed 28 points in each of those periods. The combined 68-56 second-half advantage explains the entire comeback.
The most important element was not just scoring volume. The Lakers found more reliable ways to create efficient possessions.
Their three-point shooting was considerably better. Los Angeles made 9 of 25 attempts from outside, a 36% rate. Philadelphia made only 5 of 24, shooting 21%.
That seven-point difference in three-point shooting percentage became increasingly important as the game entered its closing stages.
The Lakers also converted 10 offensive rebounds into additional opportunities. Philadelphia’s four offensive rebounds limited its ability to compensate for its weaker perimeter shooting.
Joel Embiid’s 35-point performance
Joel Embiid was Philadelphia’s leading scorer and one of the most efficient offensive players on either team.
He finished with:
| Statistic | Joel Embiid |
| Minutes | 39 |
| Points | 35 |
| Field Goals | 13-19 |
| Three-Pointers | 1-2 |
| Free Throws | 8-8 |
| Rebounds | 7 |
| Assists | 7 |
| Turnovers | 3 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Blocks | 2 |
| Plus/Minus | +7 |
Embiid’s 13-for-19 shooting translates to roughly 68% from the field, an excellent efficiency level for a high-volume scorer.
His 35 points came without excessive reliance on three-point attempts. He attempted only two shots from beyond the arc and made one. He also went 8-for-8 at the free throw line.
Perhaps more important was his overall involvement.
Embiid recorded seven rebounds, seven assists, one steal and two blocks. That means his influence extended well beyond scoring.
His plus/minus of +7 also stands out because Philadelphia lost the game. It suggests that his individual minutes were productive even though the team could not maintain its advantage when the broader rotation and matchup dynamics changed.
The biggest problem was that Embiid’s strong performance did not receive enough complementary production from the perimeter.
Tyrese Maxey combined scoring and playmaking
Tyrese Maxey delivered one of the more complete offensive performances of the game.
He recorded:
| Statistic | Tyrese Maxey |
| Minutes | 37 |
| Points | 26 |
| Field Goals | 11-22 |
| Three-Pointers | 1-9 |
| Free Throws | 3-4 |
| Rebounds | 0 |
| Assists | 13 |
| Turnovers | 4 |
| Steals | 4 |
| Plus/Minus | +8 |
The 26 points were important, but the 13 assists may be the more revealing number.
Maxey was responsible for creating a large portion of Philadelphia’s offense. His 13 assists show how heavily the 76ers depended on his ability to generate shots for teammates.
He also contributed four steals, which matched his importance on the defensive side.
The weakness was perimeter efficiency.
Maxey attempted nine three-pointers but made only one. That 1-for-9 performance reduced the overall value of his 26-point scoring night.
Philadelphia still shot 54% from the field as a team, so the issue was not poor overall shotmaking. Instead, the 76ers struggled to produce enough efficient three-point offense to match Los Angeles during the comeback.
VJ Edgecombe provided a major two-way contribution
VJ Edgecombe produced an impressive all-around line.
He finished with 19 points, 10 rebounds, two assists and four steals.
His shooting line was:
7-for-16 from the field, 3-for-7 from three-point range and 2-for-2 at the free throw line.
That made him one of Philadelphia’s better perimeter shooters in the game.
His 10 rebounds were particularly valuable because the 76ers were badly outmuscled on the overall glass. Edgecombe’s work helped compensate for some of the team’s rebounding weakness.
His four steals were also tied for the team lead with Maxey.
Edgecombe finished with a minus-2 plus/minus, which was relatively modest considering the Lakers’ four-point victory.
His performance demonstrated why raw scoring alone does not capture the value of a player. His rebounding, steals and three-point shooting all contributed to keeping Philadelphia competitive.
Dominick Barlow gave Philadelphia efficient bench production
Dominick Barlow finished with 13 points in 26 minutes.
He shot 6-for-10 from the field, which gave him a 60% field-goal percentage.
His complete line included three rebounds, two steals and one block.
Barlow’s plus/minus was +1, meaning the 76ers actually performed slightly better than the Lakers during his minutes despite the overall loss.
The weakness came at the free throw line. He made only one of three attempts.
Still, his 13 points on 10 field-goal attempts represented useful secondary production.
Kelly Oubre Jr. struggled as a scorer but contributed elsewhere
Kelly Oubre Jr. scored eight points while playing nearly 40 minutes.
He shot 2-for-8 from the field and 0-for-3 from three-point range.
However, the rest of his statistical line was more productive:
- 4 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 3 steals
- 0 turnovers
- 4-for-4 free throws
- +4 plus/minus
This is a good example of why a single scoring number can be misleading.
Oubre was inefficient as a shooter, but he protected possessions, created some defensive disruption and made all four of his free throws.
His three steals also contributed to Philadelphia’s overall advantage in forcing turnovers.
Austin Reaves was the decisive Lakers player
Austin Reaves produced the most important individual scoring performance of the game.
He scored 35 points in only 25 minutes while shooting 12-for-17 from the field, 5-for-8 from three-point range and 6-for-7 from the free throw line.
His full statistical line was:
| Statistic | Austin Reaves |
| Minutes | 25 |
| Points | 35 |
| Field Goals | 12-17 |
| Three-Pointers | 5-8 |
| Free Throws | 6-7 |
| Rebounds | 6 |
| Assists | 2 |
| Turnovers | 5 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 1 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 5 |
| Plus/Minus | +5 |
Reaves shot approximately 70.6% from the field.
His 5-for-8 three-point shooting was even more significant.
Philadelphia’s defense forced Maxey into a 1-for-9 night from three, while Reaves repeatedly punished the 76ers from outside.
According to the NBA’s official game report, Reaves’ second-half scoring was central to the Lakers’ comeback. He opened the fourth quarter with back-to-back three-pointers as Los Angeles launched a 21-6 run.
That sequence changed the game.
Reaves also returned after missing time with a calf issue, making his 35-point performance even more notable within the context of the matchup.
Luka Doncic’s abbreviated night
Luka Doncic finished with 10 points before leaving the game during the second quarter because of left leg soreness.
His recorded line included:
| Statistic | Luka Doncic |
| Minutes | 16 |
| Points | 10 |
| Field Goals | 3-10 |
| Three-Pointers | 0-4 |
| Free Throws | 4-4 |
| Rebounds | 4 |
| Assists | 2 |
| Turnovers | 5 |
| Plus/Minus | +5 |
Doncic did not return for the second half.
That dramatically changed the Lakers’ offensive structure.
Los Angeles entered the game expecting its primary offensive creators to include Doncic, LeBron James and Reaves. Once Doncic left, the responsibility shifted heavily toward the remaining players.
Reaves responded with a scoring explosion.
The Lakers did not replace Doncic with one player. Instead, they redistributed his offensive responsibility across multiple players.
That distinction is important when evaluating the 76ers vs lakers match player stats.
A conventional box-score reading might simply say Doncic scored 10 points and left early. A deeper reading shows that his departure forced a significant tactical adjustment that coincided with Reaves becoming the primary scoring catalyst.
LeBron James’ playmaking mattered more than his scoring
LeBron James scored 17 points, but his 10 assists were arguably more important to the Lakers’ comeback.
His line included:
- 37 minutes
- 17 points
- 7-for-17 shooting
- 0-for-3 from three
- 3-for-3 from the free throw line
- 4 rebounds
- 10 assists
- 8 turnovers
- 1 block
- -5 plus/minus
The eight turnovers are the obvious negative.
James’ minus-5 plus/minus also looks unusual considering Los Angeles won.
Yet his 10 assists demonstrate why the Lakers could still generate efficient offense after Doncic exited.
James continued to create opportunities, move the ball and involve teammates.
His performance was therefore a mixture of high-level playmaking and costly mistakes.
The final four-point margin makes those turnovers especially relevant. Philadelphia’s ability to generate 15 steals helped create additional possessions, but Los Angeles ultimately survived those mistakes.
Rui Hachimura quietly delivered a major contribution
Rui Hachimura scored 14 points on 5-for-7 shooting and made both of his three-point attempts.
He also grabbed seven rebounds.
His plus/minus was +16, one of the strongest figures among Lakers players.
That combination is important.
Hachimura did not need a huge shot volume to influence the game. He was efficient, stretched the floor and contributed on the glass.
His late-game contribution was also important. With 12 seconds remaining, Maxi Kleber found Hachimura for a dunk that helped Los Angeles protect its lead.
Jake LaRavia produced efficient scoring
Jake LaRavia finished with 14 points in 23 minutes.
He shot 5-for-7 from the field and 4-for-5 from the free throw line.
His line also included two assists and three steals.
Although he did not collect a rebound, LaRavia’s scoring efficiency helped the Lakers maintain offensive balance.
His three steals were particularly valuable in a game where Philadelphia itself generated 15 steals.
Deandre Ayton provided interior efficiency
Deandre Ayton scored 10 points in 20 minutes.
He shot 4-for-5 from the field and 2-for-2 from the free throw line.
He also collected six rebounds and blocked two shots.
The major issue was his minus-13 plus/minus.
That does not mean Ayton individually caused the Lakers’ problems during his minutes. Plus/minus is a team-dependent statistic and can be heavily affected by lineup combinations.
Still, the number provides useful context when examining the full game.
His individual shooting was excellent, but Los Angeles performed better overall with certain other combinations on the floor.
Marcus Smart’s defense and shooting were mixed
Marcus Smart scored seven points and added five assists.
He shot 2-for-5 from the field and 2-for-3 from three-point range.
He also collected four rebounds and committed no turnovers.
However, his plus/minus was minus-15, the weakest figure among the Lakers’ major rotation players.
This contrast reinforces a key lesson from the game: no single box-score category should be interpreted in isolation.
Smart’s zero turnovers and five assists were useful, but the Lakers still had their most difficult stretches with him on the floor.
Maxi Kleber’s plus/minus tells an interesting story
Maxi Kleber scored only four points, but his plus/minus was +23.
He also recorded:
- 4 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 3 steals
- 4 offensive rebounds
- 1 turnover
The four offensive rebounds stand out.
Los Angeles needed extra possessions because Philadelphia was shooting efficiently overall. Kleber’s work on the offensive glass helped create second chances.
His four assists also show that his contribution was not limited to rebounding.
This is one of the clearest examples from the game of why points do not tell the complete story.
Rebounding was one of the biggest differences
The Lakers won the overall rebounding battle 42-28.
That is a 14-rebound advantage.
The offensive rebounding difference was even more direct:
Los Angeles had 10 offensive rebounds.
Philadelphia had only four.
That gave the Lakers six more offensive boards.
In a game decided by four points, extra possessions of that scale can be decisive.
Philadelphia shot 54% from the field, so the Lakers did not beat the 76ers simply by forcing misses.
Instead, Los Angeles compensated by winning the possession battle.
The Lakers also had 32 defensive rebounds compared with Philadelphia’s 24.
That reduced Philadelphia’s opportunities to create second-chance points.
Three-point shooting created another major advantage
Philadelphia made five of 24 three-point attempts.
Los Angeles made nine of 25.
The difference was four made three-pointers.
Because every three-point field goal is worth three points, those additional makes represented 12 points of scoring value.
Philadelphia’s 21% shooting from outside was a significant limitation.
Maxey went 1-for-9.
Oubre went 0-for-3.
Embiid was 1-for-2.
Edgecombe was the strongest high-volume three-point shooter among the primary Philadelphia players, making three of seven.
The Lakers were more balanced.
Reaves made five of eight.
Hachimura made both of his attempts.
Smart made two of three.
That perimeter efficiency helped Los Angeles recover from the early deficit.
Philadelphia’s turnover advantage was not enough
The 76ers committed only 14 turnovers.
The Lakers committed 22.
That gave Philadelphia an eight-turnover advantage.
Ordinarily, that would be a major positive.
Philadelphia also converted its defensive pressure into 15 steals.
However, the 76ers could not fully capitalize because they lost the rebounding battle and struggled from three-point range.
This is a valuable analytical point from the game.
A team can win one possession category and still lose the overall possession battle.
Philadelphia created extra opportunities through steals and by protecting the ball. Los Angeles created extra opportunities through offensive rebounds and more efficient shooting.
The Lakers’ advantages ultimately proved more valuable.
The fourth quarter decided the matchup
The fourth quarter was the most important period.
Los Angeles entered it behind and then scored 34 points.
Philadelphia also scored 28, but the Lakers’ six-point advantage in the final quarter was enough to secure the win.
The Lakers opened the quarter aggressively.
Reaves hit consecutive three-pointers and became the centerpiece of the comeback.
Los Angeles then established a 110-94 lead with four minutes remaining.
Philadelphia refused to go away.
VJ Edgecombe intercepted a LeBron James inbounds pass and converted a three-pointer, cutting the Lakers’ advantage to 116-113 with 36 seconds remaining.
That sequence demonstrated Philadelphia’s defensive pressure and resilience.
The game was still effectively undecided until the final possessions.
Kleber’s pass to Hachimura for a dunk with 12 seconds remaining gave Los Angeles the margin it needed.
Comparing the leading scorers
The two 35-point performances deserve direct comparison.
Joel Embiid
Embiid:
- Scored 35 points
- Shot 13-for-19
- Made 1 of 2 threes
- Made all 8 free throws
- Added 7 rebounds
- Added 7 assists
- Blocked 2 shots
- Finished +7
Austin Reaves
Reaves:
- Scored 35 points
- Shot 12-for-17
- Made 5 of 8 threes
- Made 6 of 7 free throws
- Added 6 rebounds
- Added 2 assists
- Finished +5
Both players scored 35.
The difference was how those points were generated.
Embiid dominated through interior scoring and free throws while also functioning as a passer.
Reaves created his scoring through efficient perimeter shooting, transition opportunities and aggressive fourth-quarter offense.
Their statistical profiles were very different, yet equally important to the game’s narrative.
What the player statistics reveal about each team
The deeper lesson from the game is that both teams had legitimate strengths.
Philadelphia’s advantages included:
- 15 steals
- 14 turnovers compared with 22 by Los Angeles
- 29 assists
- 54% field-goal shooting
- Strong performances from Embiid and Maxey
- 10 rebounds from Edgecombe
Los Angeles’ advantages included:
- 42 total rebounds
- 10 offensive rebounds
- 56% field-goal shooting
- 36% three-point shooting
- 9 made three-pointers
- 34 points in both the third and fourth quarters
- 35 points from Reaves
The matchup was therefore decided by balance rather than one overwhelming statistical category.
Why Philadelphia lost despite shooting 54%
A 54% field-goal percentage is normally a strong foundation for winning.
Philadelphia also scored 115 points.
The problem was that Los Angeles was even more efficient from the field at 56%.
The Lakers also made four more three-pointers.
Philadelphia’s 5-for-24 three-point shooting meant that its overall shooting efficiency was heavily dependent on two-point production.
That worked for much of the game.
But once Los Angeles increased its pace and perimeter accuracy, Philadelphia had fewer ways to respond.
The 76ers also collected only four offensive rebounds.
That limited their ability to recover from missed shots.
Why the Lakers won despite 22 turnovers
Los Angeles committed eight more turnovers than Philadelphia.
That is normally a major warning sign.
However, the Lakers offset those mistakes through other areas.
- They grabbed 14 more total rebounds.
- They made four more three-pointers.
- They shot slightly better overall.
- They also produced 68 second-half points.
Most importantly, the Lakers improved their offensive performance exactly when the game demanded it.
Their 34-point third quarter erased much of Philadelphia’s halftime advantage, and another 34-point fourth quarter completed the comeback.
The importance of bench production
The Lakers received an extraordinary performance from Reaves off the bench.
His 35 points were the most important example of secondary scoring in the game.
Philadelphia had useful bench contributions from Barlow, who scored 13 points, but it did not receive an equivalent scoring explosion.
That difference became more important after Doncic left.
Los Angeles needed another creator.
Reaves became that player.
This is one of the most important contextual points when studying the box score. The Lakers did not simply lose a star and hope the rest of the team could survive. Their rotation adjusted, and Reaves produced the scoring required to change the game’s direction.
Season series result
The Lakers won the season series 2-0 against Philadelphia.
The previous meeting ended with Los Angeles winning 112-108 on December 8.
The February meeting therefore gave the Lakers another narrow victory, this time by four points.
Both games were competitive.
That makes the season series particularly useful for evaluating the matchup because neither contest was decided by a huge margin.
What fans should take from these statistics
For readers checking 76ers vs lakers match player stats, the most important lesson is to look beyond the final score.
The first numbers most people notice are the 35 points scored by Embiid and Reaves.
Those numbers matter.
But the game was really decided by several smaller statistical differences.
The Lakers won the rebounding battle by 14.
- They made four more three-pointers.
- They scored 68 points after halftime.
- They received 35 points from Reaves in only 25 minutes.
Philadelphia generated 15 steals and committed eight fewer turnovers, yet those advantages were not enough to overcome the Lakers’ efficiency and rebounding.
This is why complete player statistics are more useful than simply looking at the top scorers.
Official statistical reference
For readers who want to verify the complete box score, player minutes, shooting figures, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, turnovers and plus/minus values, the official NBA game page provides the authoritative record for the matchup. NBA official box score and game summary
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the 76ers vs Lakers game?
Joel Embiid and Austin Reaves both scored 35 points. Embiid led Philadelphia, while Reaves led Los Angeles and produced his 35 points in only 25 minutes.
What was the final score between the 76ers and Lakers?
The Los Angeles Lakers defeated the Philadelphia 76ers 119-115 on February 6, 2026.
How many points did Joel Embiid score against the Lakers?
Joel Embiid scored 35 points. He shot 13-for-19 from the field, made one of two three-point attempts and converted all eight of his free throws.
How did Tyrese Maxey perform against the Lakers?
Tyrese Maxey scored 26 points and recorded 13 assists. He also had four steals, although he struggled from three-point range by making only one of nine attempts.
How many points did Austin Reaves score?
Austin Reaves scored 35 points in 25 minutes. He shot 12-for-17 from the field and made five of eight three-point attempts.
Did the Lakers win both games against the 76ers during the season series?
Yes. Los Angeles won both meetings during the season series, including the earlier 112-108 victory on December 8 and the 119-115 victory on February 6.
Conclusion
The 76ers vs lakers match player stats from February 6, 2026 show a game defined by efficiency, rebounding, second-half execution and individual shotmaking.
Joel Embiid delivered 35 points with excellent shooting efficiency and added seven rebounds and seven assists. Tyrese Maxey supplied 26 points and 13 assists, while VJ Edgecombe contributed 19 points, 10 rebounds and four steals.
For Los Angeles, Austin Reaves was the defining performer with 35 points on 12-for-17 shooting and five made three-pointers. LeBron James contributed 17 points and 10 assists, while Rui Hachimura and Jake LaRavia each scored 14.
The statistical contrast is especially revealing. Philadelphia protected the ball better and generated more steals, but Los Angeles controlled the boards, shot better from three-point range and produced 68 points in the second half.
The Lakers’ 42-28 rebounding advantage and 9-25 three-point shooting compared with Philadelphia’s 5-24 mark ultimately helped overcome the turnover disadvantage.
The result was a 119-115 Lakers victory and a 2-0 season series sweep. More importantly, the box score demonstrates why evaluating an NBA game requires more than identifying the highest scorer. The decisive factors were distributed across shooting efficiency, offensive rebounds, second-half scoring, playmaking and timely contributions from the supporting cast.
One Comment