Chicago bears vs minnesota vikings match player stats

The chicago bears vs minnesota vikings match player stats from November 16, 2025, tell the story of a game that changed dramatically over four quarters. Chicago defeated Minnesota 19-17 at U.S. Bank Stadium, improving to 7-3 while the Vikings fell to 4-6. The Bears led 16-3 entering the fourth quarter, but Minnesota scored 14 points in the final period and briefly moved ahead before Cairo Santos delivered the decisive field goal.

For anyone studying the box score, this matchup is more interesting than the final score alone suggests. Caleb Williams finished with 193 passing yards but no passing touchdowns, while J.J. McCarthy also completed 16 of 32 attempts and produced 150 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions. Chicago generated 140 rushing yards compared with Minnesota’s 115, while both teams recorded exactly 16 receptions. The major statistical difference came through turnovers, kicking, and the Bears’ ability to create favorable field position late in the game.

This article breaks down the chicago bears vs minnesota vikings match player stats by quarterback play, rushing, receiving, defense, special teams, scoring, and game situation so readers can understand not only what happened, but why the numbers mattered.

Table of Contents

Game Overview

The matchup took place on November 16, 2025, during Week 11 of the NFL regular season at U.S. Bank Stadium in Minneapolis. Chicago entered the game with a 6-3 record, while Minnesota was 4-5. The Bears ultimately left Minnesota with a 19-17 victory and a 7-3 record.

The scoring pattern was unusual because Minnesota started better but Chicago controlled the middle portion of the contest.

Quarter	Chicago Bears	Minnesota Vikings
Q1	0	3
Q2	10	0
Q3	6	0
Q4	3	14
Final	19	17

The quarter-by-quarter numbers explain how close the game became.

Chicago scored 16 unanswered points across the second and third quarters. Minnesota then responded with 14 points in the fourth quarter, turning a 16-3 deficit into a 17-16 lead with less than a minute remaining. Devin Duvernay’s 56-yard kick return gave Chicago excellent field position before Santos converted the game-winning 48-yard field goal.

That sequence is important when interpreting the individual statistics. This was not a game where one quarterback simply overwhelmed the other. Instead, field position, defensive takeaways, rushing efficiency, and late-game execution had a major influence.

chicago bears vs minnesota vikings match player stats: Quarterbacks

Quarterback statistics provide an immediate snapshot of how challenging this game was for both offenses.

Caleb Williams

Caleb Williams completed 16 of 32 passes for 193 yards. He averaged 6.0 yards per attempt, threw no touchdowns and no interceptions, and finished with a reported 68.9 passer rating and 30.2 QBR.

His passing line was not spectacular, but it also does not fully describe his contribution.

Statistic	Caleb Williams
Completions	16
Attempts	32
Completion rate	50.0%
Passing yards	193
Yards per attempt	6.0
TD passes	0
INTs	0
Sacks	2
Sack yards	13
Passer rating	68.9
QBR	30.2

Williams also contributed 26 rushing yards on four carries, averaging 6.5 yards per rush. His longest run covered 16 yards.

That rushing production mattered because Chicago did not rely entirely on conventional running-back production. Williams’ mobility helped the Bears maintain offensive flexibility when passing opportunities became difficult.

One of the most important things to notice is that Williams avoided an interception. Minnesota’s defense recorded two sacks and 10 tackles for loss, but it did not force a turnover from the Chicago quarterback.

J.J. McCarthy

J.J. McCarthy completed the same number of passes as Williams, going 16-for-32, but his 150 yards came with one touchdown and two interceptions.

Statistic	J.J. McCarthy
Completions	16
Attempts	32
Completion rate	50.0%
Passing yards	150
Yards per attempt	4.7
TD passes	1
INTs	2
Sacks	0
Passer rating	47.7
QBR	19.9

McCarthy’s touchdown went to Jordan Addison, but the two interceptions were particularly significant because Chicago converted Minnesota’s mistakes into possession and scoring opportunities.

The contrast between the two quarterbacks is therefore clearer when efficiency and ball security are considered together. Williams did not produce a touchdown pass, but he also did not throw an interception. McCarthy produced a touchdown but surrendered two interceptions.

For a close divisional game, that difference can be decisive.

Rushing Statistics

The rushing numbers provide another important layer of context.

Chicago finished with 39 rushing attempts for 140 yards, an average of 3.6 yards per carry and one touchdown. Minnesota ran 22 times for 115 yards, averaging 5.2 yards per attempt and also scoring one rushing touchdown.

Team	Carries	Yards	Average	TD
Chicago	39	140	3.6	1
Minnesota	22	115	5.2	1

Minnesota was considerably more efficient on a per-carry basis, but Chicago ran the ball 17 more times.

That distinction is important. A higher rushing average does not automatically mean a team controlled the ground game. Volume matters, especially when a team is attempting to manage the game and protect a lead.

D’Andre Swift

D’Andre Swift was Chicago’s leading rusher.

He carried the ball 21 times for 90 yards, averaging 4.3 yards per carry. His longest run went for 11 yards.

Statistic	D’Andre Swift
Carries	21
Rushing yards	90
Average	4.3
TDs	0
Long	11

Swift accounted for nearly two-thirds of Chicago’s rushing attempts.

His workload helped Chicago maintain a consistent rushing presence even though the offense did not generate explosive passing production.

Swift also received three targets but did not record a reception in the supplied game data.

Caleb Williams as a Runner

Williams added four carries for 26 yards.

His 6.5-yard average was higher than Swift’s and gave Chicago another way to move the chains. Quarterback rushing is especially relevant in games where passing efficiency is limited because designed or improvised quarterback runs can create yardage without requiring a successful pass.

Kyle Monangai

Kyle Monangai carried the ball 12 times for 23 yards and scored Chicago’s rushing touchdown.

His 1.9-yard average was modest, but the touchdown gave his workload direct scoring value.

He also caught one pass for 14 yards, adding another 14 yards to his offensive production.

Minnesota’s Rushing Leaders

Aaron Jones Sr. led Minnesota with 16 carries for 70 yards, averaging 4.4 yards per carry.

Jordan Mason was even more efficient, rushing six times for 45 yards at 7.5 yards per carry. His longest run covered 16 yards, and he scored Minnesota’s rushing touchdown.

Mason’s efficiency stands out in the box score. Six carries for 45 yards represents more than seven yards every time he ran the football.

However, Minnesota only gave him six rushing attempts, while Jones received 16.

Receiving Production

Both teams finished with 16 receptions, but Chicago gained more total receiving yardage.

Team	Receptions	Receiving yards	Average	TD
Chicago	16	193	12.1	0
Minnesota	16	150	9.4	1

Chicago averaged 12.1 yards per reception, compared with 9.4 for Minnesota.

The Bears therefore produced 43 more receiving yards on the same number of catches.

Cole Kmet

Cole Kmet led Chicago in receptions with five.

He caught five of five targets for 45 yards, averaging 9.0 yards per reception. His longest reception went for 14 yards.

Kmet’s five receptions gave him the highest catch total among Chicago pass catchers.

Rome Odunze

Rome Odunze caught two passes for 41 yards on six targets.

His 20.5-yard average was the highest among Chicago’s primary receivers, and his longest catch covered 24 yards.

The low reception count compared with his yardage shows that Chicago’s passing attack included some explosive plays even though it did not produce a touchdown.

Colston Loveland

Colston Loveland recorded three receptions for 40 yards on four targets.

His average of 13.3 yards per catch was another indication that Chicago was capable of creating meaningful yardage without consistently completing high-volume passes.

Luther Burden III

Luther Burden III finished with three receptions for 27 yards on five targets.

His 27 receiving yards represented a smaller portion of Chicago’s passing production, but three catches provided useful volume in a game where the Bears completed only 16 passes.

Other Chicago Receivers

DJ Moore caught one pass for 18 yards on three targets.

Kyle Monangai added one reception for 14 yards.

Durham Smythe caught one pass for eight yards.

The distribution shows a relatively spread-out passing attack. No Chicago receiver reached 50 yards, but several players contributed.

Minnesota Receiving Leaders

Justin Jefferson led the Vikings in receiving.

He caught five passes for 61 yards on nine targets, averaging 12.2 yards per reception. His longest reception went for 27 yards.

Player	Rec	Targets	Yards	Avg	TD	Long
Justin Jefferson	5	9	61	12.2	0	27
T.J. Hockenson	3	6	39	13.0	0	21
Jordan Addison	2	7	20	10.0	1	15
Jalen Nailor	1	1	16	16.0	0	16
Aaron Jones Sr.	3	6	11	3.7	0	7
Adam Thielen	1	2	6	6.0	0	6

Jefferson’s nine targets were the most on either team, but Chicago held him to 61 yards and no touchdowns.

T.J. Hockenson added three catches for 39 yards, while Jordan Addison scored Minnesota’s receiving touchdown.

Addison’s two receptions produced only 20 yards, but one of those catches resulted in six points.

This is a useful reminder that raw receiving yardage does not always correspond directly to scoring impact.

Defensive Statistics

The defensive numbers are one of the clearest areas where the teams differed.

Chicago recorded 58 total tackles, including 26 solo tackles. The Bears registered one tackle for loss, five passes defended, and five quarterback hits.

Minnesota recorded 85 tackles, 39 solo tackles, 10 tackles for loss, three passes defended, and five quarterback hits.

Defensive category	Chicago	Minnesota
Total tackles	58	85
Solo tackles	26	39
Tackles for loss	1	10
Passes defended	5	3
QB hits	5	5
Sacks	0	2
Interceptions	2	0

At first glance, Minnesota’s 10 tackles for loss and two sacks look stronger than Chicago’s zero sacks.

But the turnover column tells a different story.

Chicago intercepted McCarthy twice.

Kevin Byard recorded one interception and returned it 23 yards. Nahshon Wright also recorded an interception.

Minnesota did not record an interception.

In a two-point game, a two-turnover advantage is a major statistical factor.

Turnover Battle

The turnover battle deserves its own section because it directly connects the defensive numbers to the final score.

Chicago’s defense intercepted McCarthy twice.

Kevin Byard produced a 23-yard interception return, while Nahshon Wright recorded the other interception.

Neither Chicago interception resulted in a defensive touchdown, but each ended a Minnesota possession.

Chicago also recorded one fumble without losing it. Caleb Williams was credited with one fumble that Chicago recovered.

Minnesota had one team fumble that it recovered itself, with Aaron Jones Sr. also credited with a fumble.

The key difference was therefore interceptions.

Why Two Interceptions Mattered

Minnesota’s offense completed 16 passes, but two of McCarthy’s attempts ended with Chicago defenders.

That reduced the number of possessions Minnesota could finish with productive offensive drives.

It also helped Chicago survive a passing offense that produced only 193 passing yards itself.

This is one of the strongest lessons from the box score: a team does not necessarily need overwhelming offensive production to win if it can avoid turnovers and force them from its opponent.

Special Teams Statistics

Special teams played an enormous role in the final result.

Cairo Santos

Cairo Santos converted four of five field-goal attempts and made his only extra-point attempt.

He scored 13 points for Chicago.

His longest successful field goal was listed at 54 yards in the supplied data.

The most important kick came late in the fourth quarter, when Santos converted the game-winning 48-yard field goal after Chicago regained favorable field position.

Will Reichard

Minnesota kicker Will Reichard made his only field-goal attempt and converted both extra-point attempts.

He finished with five points.

Kicker	FG	FG %	XP	Points
Cairo Santos	4/5	80.0%	1/1	13
Will Reichard	1/1	100%	2/2	5

The difference in field-goal production was significant.

Chicago scored 12 points from field goals, while Minnesota scored only three from its field goal.

That six-point difference from Chicago’s successful field goals was larger than the final two-point margin.

Kick Returns and Field Position

Devin Duvernay produced one of the most important individual plays of the game with a 56-yard kick return.

Chicago finished with three kick returns for 108 yards, averaging 36.0 yards per return.

Josh Blackwell added a 30-yard return, while Roschon Johnson had a 22-yard return.

Minnesota’s Myles Price returned four kickoffs for 93 yards, averaging 23.3 yards per return.

The difference in average return yardage gave Chicago better starting field position in several situations.

The 56-yard Duvernay return was particularly important because it came immediately after Minnesota had taken a 17-16 lead. Instead of beginning a final drive deep in its own territory, Chicago started with excellent field position and needed only enough yardage to set up Santos.

That sequence demonstrates why special teams statistics should not be treated as secondary information in a close NFL game.

Punting Numbers

Both teams punted six times.

Chicago’s Tory Taylor punted for 286 total yards, averaging 47.7 yards per punt, with a long of 57 yards and two punts inside the 20.

Minnesota’s Ryan Wright punted for 297 yards, averaging 49.5 yards per punt, with a long of 61 yards and two punts inside the 20.

Punter	Punts	Yards	Average	Long	Inside 20
Tory Taylor	6	286	47.7	57	2
Ryan Wright	6	297	49.5	61	2

The punting numbers were fairly close.

Minnesota had the higher average, but both teams placed two punts inside the 20-yard line.

Chicago’s advantage came more from its return game and late field-position sequence than from punting alone.

The Fourth Quarter Changed Everything

The most important part of this game was the fourth quarter.

Chicago entered the final period with a 16-3 advantage.

Minnesota then scored 14 unanswered points.

The Vikings’ comeback eventually gave them a 17-16 lead with less than a minute remaining.

At that point, the game appeared to have completely flipped.

Instead, Duvernay returned the kickoff 56 yards, putting Chicago in position for one final scoring drive. Santos then converted the winning field goal.

The sequence shows how quickly an NFL game can change when field position and special teams become decisive.

The lesson is important when examining the chicago bears vs minnesota vikings match player stats. The final quarter cannot be separated from the special-teams statistics.

A box score showing 193 passing yards for Williams does not immediately explain why Chicago won.

The sequence of:

Minnesota taking the lead
Duvernay producing a 56-yard return
Chicago gaining favorable field position
Santos converting the winning field goal

does.

What the Statistics Say About Each Offense

Chicago’s offense was built around balance rather than explosive quarterback production.

The Bears recorded:

193 passing yards
140 rushing yards
16 receptions
39 rushing attempts
One rushing touchdown
Zero passing touchdowns
Zero interceptions

That is a relatively conservative offensive profile.

Williams did enough to avoid costly mistakes, while Swift handled 21 carries and the rushing attack generated 140 yards.

Minnesota’s offense was more efficient on the ground but less successful overall in protecting possessions.

The Vikings recorded:

150 passing yards
115 rushing yards
16 receptions
22 rushing attempts
One passing touchdown
One rushing touchdown
Two interceptions

Minnesota averaged more yards per rushing attempt and scored two offensive touchdowns, compared with Chicago’s one offensive touchdown.

Yet Chicago still won because field goals and turnovers changed the scoring equation.

Comparing the Main Players

A useful way to read the chicago bears vs minnesota vikings match player stats is to compare the leading contributors rather than looking at one category.

Category	Chicago	Minnesota
Passing leader	Caleb Williams	J.J. McCarthy
Passing yards	193	150
Passing TDs	0	1
INTs	0	2
Rushing leader	D’Andre Swift	Aaron Jones Sr.
Rushing yards	90	70
Receiving leader	Cole Kmet	Justin Jefferson
Receiving yards	45	61
Team rushing yards	140	115
Team receiving yards	193	150
Team INTs	2	0
Field goals	4	1
Final score	19	17

This table shows why the result cannot be explained by a single statistic.

Minnesota had the more efficient rushing attack.

Jefferson had more receiving yards than any Chicago receiver.

Jordan Addison scored a receiving touchdown.

Yet Chicago produced more total passing yards, more rushing yards, two interceptions, and significantly more field-goal production.

What Stands Out From the Box Score

Several details deserve attention from anyone studying the game.

1. Chicago won without a passing touchdown

Williams threw for 193 yards but did not throw a touchdown.

Chicago still scored 19 points.

That came from one rushing touchdown and four successful field goals.

2. Minnesota had two offensive touchdowns

The Vikings scored one rushing touchdown and one receiving touchdown.

Jordan Mason supplied the rushing touchdown, while Jordan Addison scored through the air.

Despite that, Minnesota finished with fewer points.

3. Chicago had the turnover advantage

Two interceptions against zero Minnesota interceptions were crucial.

4. Minnesota rushed more efficiently

The Vikings averaged 5.2 yards per rushing attempt compared with Chicago’s 3.6.

5. Chicago ran the ball more often

The Bears had 39 rushing attempts compared with 22 for Minnesota.

6. Special teams produced the final swing

Duvernay’s 56-yard return put Chicago in position for Santos’ winning kick.

7. Justin Jefferson led all receivers in yardage

His five catches for 61 yards were the highest receiving yardage total in the game.

Why Raw Player Statistics Can Be Misleading

A common mistake when reading NFL box scores is assuming that the player with the most yards necessarily had the largest influence on the outcome.

This game is a strong example.

Jefferson led the game in receiving yards.

Mason averaged 7.5 yards per carry.

Minnesota averaged 5.2 yards per rush.

McCarthy threw a touchdown.

Yet Chicago won.

That happened because the game was determined by a combination of possession results, turnovers, field position, and kicking.

For that reason, player statistics should be read as connected pieces rather than isolated achievements.

A quarterback’s passing line should be considered alongside turnovers.

A running back’s average should be considered alongside workload.

A receiver’s yardage should be considered alongside targets and touchdowns.

And special-teams numbers should be considered alongside starting field position.

How to Read This Game Like a Stat Analyst

For readers who want to understand NFL box scores at a deeper level, the following process works well.

Start With the Score Progression

Look at when the points were scored.

Chicago’s 16-3 lead demonstrates that the Bears controlled the middle of the game.

Minnesota’s 14-point fourth quarter demonstrates that the game became competitive late.

Check Possession Errors

Next, look for interceptions and lost fumbles.

Chicago intercepted McCarthy twice.

Minnesota did not intercept Williams.

That immediately identifies a major difference.

Examine Offensive Balance

Chicago’s 39 rushing attempts show an emphasis on the ground game.

Minnesota’s 22 attempts indicate a much different offensive distribution.

Study Third-Level Contributions

Finally, check special teams.

Duvernay’s 56-yard return and Santos’ late field goal were directly connected to the final outcome.

This approach gives a more complete picture than simply searching for the player with the highest yardage total.

Historical Context Within the 2025 Season

The Week 11 victory was particularly meaningful for Chicago’s 2025 campaign because it moved the Bears to 7-3.

The Vikings fell to 4-6.

The two teams had also met earlier in the season. Minnesota won that Week 1 meeting 27-24 in Chicago.

That makes the Week 11 result notable as a split in the two regular-season meetings.

The first matchup featured Minnesota scoring 21 fourth-quarter points, while the second matchup featured Minnesota scoring 14 fourth-quarter points after Chicago had built a substantial lead.

The second meeting therefore cannot be viewed as an isolated box score. It was part of a season series in which both games were decided by relatively small margins.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score of the Bears vs Vikings game?

The Chicago Bears defeated the Minnesota Vikings 19-17 on November 16, 2025, at U.S. Bank Stadium.

How many passing yards did Caleb Williams have?

Caleb Williams completed 16 of 32 passes for 193 yards. He threw no touchdowns and no interceptions.

How many passing yards did J.J. McCarthy have?

J.J. McCarthy completed 16 of 32 passes for 150 yards, with one touchdown and two interceptions.

Who led the Bears in rushing?

D’Andre Swift led Chicago with 21 carries for 90 yards and averaged 4.3 yards per carry.

Who led the Vikings in receiving?

Justin Jefferson led Minnesota with five receptions for 61 yards on nine targets.

Who kicked the game-winning field goal?

Cairo Santos kicked the game-winning 48-yard field goal after Chicago regained favorable field position late in the fourth quarter.

Conclusion

The chicago bears vs minnesota vikings match player stats from November 16, 2025, reveal a game that was decided by much more than quarterback passing totals.

Caleb Williams finished with 193 passing yards and no interceptions, while D’Andre Swift supplied 90 rushing yards. Chicago’s receivers combined for 193 yards, and the Bears’ defense intercepted J.J. McCarthy twice.

Minnesota received strong contributions from Justin Jefferson, Aaron Jones Sr., Jordan Mason, and Jordan Addison. Mason averaged 7.5 yards per carry, Jefferson recorded 61 receiving yards, and Addison scored a touchdown.

The Vikings also produced a strong 5.2 yards-per-carry rushing average as a team.

But Chicago’s four successful field goals, two interceptions, heavier rushing volume, and crucial special-teams contribution ultimately shaped the final result. The decisive sequence came after Minnesota took a 17-16 lead, when Devin Duvernay returned the kickoff 56 yards and Cairo Santos converted the winning field goal.

The broader lesson from this box score is that close NFL games often depend on several connected statistical areas. Passing yards matter, but turnovers matter too. Rushing efficiency matters, but rushing volume matters as well. Receiving totals provide context, while touchdowns and field position help explain how those yards translated into points.