Toronto Raptors vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats
The toronto raptors vs charlotte hornets match player stats from the November 17, 2025 meeting at Scotiabank Arena show how a two-point NBA game can be decided by shooting efficiency, late-game execution, rebounding, and defensive plays rather than scoring totals alone. Toronto defeated Charlotte 110-108 after building an early advantage, surviving a strong third-quarter response from the Hornets, and making the most important plays during the final possessions. Brandon Ingram led all scorers with 27 points, while Kon Knueppel paced Charlotte with 24. RJ Barrett scored the go-ahead basket with 18 seconds remaining, and Scottie Barnes made the final defensive play with a game-saving block.
The official NBA record lists the game as November 17, 2025, at 7:30 p.m. ET in Toronto, while some listings display November 18 because the game crossed midnight in other time zones. The location, result, attendance, officials, team records, and player production all match the supplied game data.
Game Overview
The Raptors entered the matchup with a 9-5 record and a 3-2 home mark, while the Hornets were 4-10 overall and 1-6 on the road. Toronto ultimately moved to 9-5 with the victory, while Charlotte dropped to 4-10.
Toronto opened the game with a 28-24 first-quarter advantage and added another point to its lead in the second quarter. At halftime, the Raptors were ahead 57-52.
Charlotte then produced the strongest quarter of the game. The Hornets scored 31 points in the third while limiting Toronto to 28, cutting the margin to two points entering the final period. Both teams scored 25 in the fourth, meaning Toronto’s early cushion ultimately became the difference.
| Category | Charlotte Hornets | Toronto Raptors |
| Final score | 108 | 110 |
| Record | 4-10 | 9-5 |
| Away/Home record | 1-6 away | 3-2 home |
| Q1 | 24 | 28 |
| Q2 | 28 | 29 |
| Q3 | 31 | 28 |
| Q4 | 25 | 25 |
| Field goals | 37-87 | 44-88 |
| Field-goal percentage | 42.5% | 50.0% |
| Three-pointers | 10-40 | 10-25 |
| Three-point percentage | 25.0% | 40.0% |
| Free throws | 24-30 | 12-16 |
| Free-throw percentage | 80.0% | 75.0% |
| Rebounds | 48 | 43 |
| Assists | 19 | 25 |
| Steals | 11 | 8 |
| Blocks | 9 | 7 |
| Turnovers | 16 | 17 |
The official box score confirms that Charlotte collected 48 rebounds, not 57, while Toronto finished with 43. That distinction matters because rebound totals can sometimes differ between secondary summaries and official box-score records.
Toronto Raptors vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats
Looking at the toronto raptors vs charlotte hornets match player stats player by player gives a much clearer explanation of the final score.
Toronto had four players score at least 13 points. Ingram led the way with 27, followed by Barrett and Barnes with 16 each and Quickley with 15. Jakob Poeltl added 13, while Gradey Dick contributed 10.
Charlotte also had four players reach double figures. Knueppel scored 24, Miles Bridges had 22, LaMelo Ball produced 20, and Collin Sexton added 17.
Toronto’s Top Individual Performers
Brandon Ingram
Ingram was the game’s leading scorer with 27 points. He also recorded 6 rebounds, 3 assists, 2 steals, and 3 blocks. His offensive production gave Toronto a reliable scoring option throughout the game, while his late defensive contribution became particularly important.
His 27-point performance came on 9-of-21 shooting from the field and 6-of-7 from the free-throw line. The official box score shows that he also connected on 3 of 6 attempts from three-point range.
Ingram’s value was not limited to scoring. His block on Ryan Kalkbrenner after Barrett’s late basket helped Toronto preserve its narrow advantage.
RJ Barrett
Barrett scored 16 points and delivered the most important offensive basket of the night.
With 18 seconds remaining, he scored the go-ahead basket that put Toronto in front. That play is a good reminder of why basic scoring totals do not always identify the player who had the biggest influence on a close game.
Barrett finished with 16 points, 3 rebounds, 3 assists, and 1 steal.
Scottie Barnes
Barnes contributed 16 points, 6 rebounds, 6 assists, 1 steal, and 1 block.
His final block was arguably the defining defensive moment of the game. After Charlotte continued its final possession, Barnes denied Collin Sexton’s putback attempt at the buzzer, securing the two-point Toronto victory.
Barnes also continued an unusual defensive streak during the game. According to the NBA game recap, he became the first Raptors player to record at least one block and one steal in 10 consecutive games, surpassing Vince Carter’s previous franchise mark of nine straight games.
Immanuel Quickley
Quickley finished with 15 points and 10 rebounds, giving Toronto a double-double.
His rebounding contribution stands out because he was Toronto’s leading rebounder despite playing in the backcourt. He also had 4 assists and 2 steals.
That production helped Toronto maintain offensive balance. Instead of relying entirely on Ingram or Barnes, the Raptors received meaningful contributions from several positions.
Jakob Poeltl
Poeltl scored 13 points and grabbed 9 rebounds. He also shot efficiently from the field, making 6 of his 7 attempts.
His interior scoring gave Toronto another way to attack Charlotte’s defense. In a game where Toronto shot 50% overall, efficient interior finishing played an important supporting role.
Charlotte’s Top Individual Performers
Kon Knueppel
Knueppel led Charlotte with 24 points.
He shot 9 of 16 from the field and 4 of 10 from three-point range. He also collected 7 rebounds, 3 steals, and 1 assist.
His scoring was especially important because Charlotte struggled badly from long range as a team. Knueppel was one of the players who kept the Hornets competitive despite the team’s 25% three-point shooting.
Miles Bridges
Bridges scored 22 points and added 8 rebounds, 3 assists, 3 steals, and 1 block.
His combination of scoring and rebounding helped Charlotte remain within striking distance. He was also one of the Hornets’ main offensive options during a game in which Charlotte needed to compensate for inefficient perimeter shooting.
LaMelo Ball
Ball produced 20 points and 8 assists while shooting 6 of 19 from the field.
His eight assists were the highest total for either team until Barnes finished with six. Ball also made 7 of 7 free throws, helping offset some of Charlotte’s struggles from the field.
His playmaking was important during Charlotte’s third-quarter push, when the Hornets scored 31 points and reduced Toronto’s lead to two.
Ryan Kalkbrenner
Kalkbrenner led Charlotte in rebounding with 10 boards.
He scored 7 points and collected 10 rebounds, including 9 defensive rebounds. The rebounding production helped Charlotte create additional possessions and compete physically despite Toronto’s superior shooting efficiency.
Shooting Efficiency Decided the Game
The clearest statistical difference between the teams was field-goal efficiency.
Toronto made 44 of 88 field-goal attempts for exactly 50%. Charlotte made 37 of 87 attempts for approximately 42.5%. That seven-and-a-half percentage-point gap is significant in a game decided by only two points.
Toronto also had a major advantage from three-point range.
The Raptors made 10 of 25 three-point attempts, producing a 40% rate. Charlotte made the same number of threes but needed 40 attempts to get there, shooting only 25%.
That difference is one of the most important parts of the toronto raptors vs charlotte hornets match player stats.
Both teams made 10 three-pointers, so the raw three-point total looks identical. The efficiency tells a completely different story.
Toronto’s 10 successful threes came on 25 attempts. Charlotte’s 10 came on 40 attempts.
That means Charlotte used 15 additional possessions on three-point attempts to reach the same number of makes.
Why the Three-Point Gap Matters
A team does not automatically benefit from taking more three-pointers. The value comes from combining volume with accuracy.
Charlotte’s 25% rate meant that many possessions ended without points. Toronto’s 40% rate allowed the Raptors to generate more points from a smaller number of attempts.
This is an important lesson when evaluating player statistics. Looking only at made threes can hide major differences in shot quality and efficiency.
Free Throws Kept Charlotte Close
Charlotte actually had the better free-throw percentage.
The Hornets made 24 of 30 free throws for 80%, while Toronto made 12 of 16 for 75%. Charlotte therefore gained eight more made free throws.
That advantage helped compensate for some of the Hornets’ shooting problems.
It also explains why the game remained close despite Toronto’s superior field-goal percentage.
A simple scoring breakdown illustrates the contrast:
- Toronto had the better field-goal percentage.
- Toronto had the better three-point percentage.
- Charlotte had the better free-throw percentage.
- Charlotte attempted 30 free throws compared with Toronto’s 16.
- Toronto ultimately won by two points.
The final margin therefore cannot be explained by one statistical category.
Rebounding and Second-Chance Opportunities
Charlotte finished with 48 rebounds compared with Toronto’s 43.
The Hornets also collected 14 offensive rebounds, while Toronto had 8. That gave Charlotte additional opportunities after missed shots.
This is an important part of the game that can be overlooked when reading only the scoring leaders.
Charlotte missed 50 field-goal attempts. Winning a large share of those rebound opportunities allowed the Hornets to create second chances.
Kalkbrenner’s 10 rebounds were particularly valuable, while Bridges added 8 and Knueppel contributed 7.
Toronto’s rebounding leader was Quickley with 10. Poeltl had 9, and Barnes collected 6.
Toronto did not win the rebounding battle. It won despite losing it.
That distinction is useful when analyzing close NBA games because a team can lose one statistical category while compensating through shooting, turnovers, transition scoring, or late-game defense.
Ball Movement Favored Toronto
Toronto recorded 25 assists compared with Charlotte’s 19.
That six-assist difference reflects a broader contrast in offensive efficiency. Toronto was not simply making more shots. The Raptors were also generating more assisted baskets.
Barnes led Toronto with 6 assists, while Quickley and Jamal Shead each contributed 4. Barrett and Ingram each had 3.
For Charlotte, Ball was the primary playmaker with 8 assists. Bridges had 3, while Knueppel and Sion James each added 1 or more according to the official box score.
The assist totals suggest that Toronto’s offense had more distributed creation, while Charlotte leaned more heavily on Ball’s playmaking.
Turnovers Were Nearly Even
Toronto committed 17 turnovers, compared with 16 by Charlotte.
This was one of the few statistical areas where the difference was almost negligible.
Normally, a one-turnover difference in a 110-108 game would not be enough to explain the result.
Charlotte did generate more steals, finishing with 11 compared with Toronto’s 8. The Hornets also blocked 9 shots compared with Toronto’s 7.
Those numbers show that Charlotte’s defense was active.
The problem was that the Hornets could not consistently turn that defensive activity into efficient offensive possessions.
The Third Quarter Changed the Game
The third quarter deserves special attention.
Toronto entered halftime ahead 57-52. Charlotte then outscored Toronto 31-28 in the third.
That reduced the Raptors’ five-point halftime advantage to two points.
The Hornets entered the fourth quarter with real momentum, and the final period became a possession-by-possession contest.
The fourth quarter ended 25-25.
Toronto did not create separation late. Instead, the Raptors relied on individual execution.
Barrett’s go-ahead basket with 18 seconds left put Toronto ahead, followed by Ingram’s defensive play and Barnes’ game-sealing block.
That sequence is the clearest explanation for how Toronto won a game in which Charlotte had several statistical advantages.
The Final Two Minutes Tell the Story
The most useful way to study a close game is often to separate the final possessions from the full-game averages.
Toronto had spent much of the night shooting more efficiently, but Charlotte continued to challenge the lead.
The Raptors’ late sequence was built around three players:
- RJ Barrett provided the go-ahead score.
- Brandon Ingram made a crucial defensive block.
- Scottie Barnes protected the lead with the final block.
That sequence shows why box-score analysis should include defensive statistics and late-game context.
A player can finish with fewer points than a teammate and still produce the most important play of the game.
What the Player Stats Say About Toronto
Toronto’s statistical profile suggests a team that won through efficiency and shared creation.
The most important positives were:
- 50% field-goal shooting
- 40% three-point shooting
- 25 assists
- 58 points in the paint
- 21 fast-break points
- Four players scoring at least 15 points
- Strong late-game defensive execution
The Raptors also had 12 points from the free-throw line compared with Charlotte’s 24, meaning they did not rely on free throws to produce the victory.
Instead, Toronto generated its scoring primarily through successful field-goal attempts.
That distinction matters because it suggests the Raptors’ offense remained effective even without a large free-throw advantage.
What the Player Stats Say About Charlotte
Charlotte’s statistical profile was more complicated.
The Hornets showed several positive signs:
- 48 rebounds
- 14 offensive rebounds
- 11 steals
- 9 blocks
- 24 made free throws
- 31 third-quarter points
- Four players in double figures
Yet the team struggled to convert its offensive opportunities efficiently.
The biggest issue was three-point shooting.
Ten made threes can look respectable, but 10-for-40 shooting means Charlotte left substantial scoring value on the table.
If the Hornets had converted even a modestly higher percentage from three, the final result could have looked very different.
Team Efficiency Comparison
The numbers provide a useful side-by-side picture.
| Metric | Hornets | Raptors | Advantage |
| Field-goal percentage | 42.5% | 50.0% | Toronto |
| Three-point percentage | 25.0% | 40.0% | Toronto |
| Free-throw percentage | 80.0% | 75.0% | Charlotte |
| Rebounds | 48 | 43 | Charlotte |
| Offensive rebounds | 14 | 8 | Charlotte |
| Assists | 19 | 25 | Toronto |
| Steals | 11 | 8 | Charlotte |
| Blocks | 9 | 7 | Charlotte |
| Turnovers | 16 | 17 | Charlotte |
| Points in the paint | 50 | 58 | Toronto |
| Fast-break points | 14 | 21 | Toronto |
The table makes the result easier to understand.
Charlotte won or tied several hustle-oriented categories. Toronto won the more important shooting-efficiency categories and executed better during the decisive possessions.
Why Brandon Ingram Was the Game’s Statistical Leader
Ingram’s 27 points were the highest individual total in the game.
He also added 6 rebounds and 3 assists, giving Toronto production across multiple areas.
His 3 blocks were especially valuable because one came during the closing sequence.
The combination of scoring and defense made Ingram more than just Toronto’s leading scorer.
For a close game, that two-way impact is more meaningful than points alone.
Why Scottie Barnes’ Performance Deserves More Attention
Barnes finished with 16 points, but his influence went beyond scoring.
He produced 6 rebounds and 6 assists while also recording a steal and a block.
The final block was the biggest reason his performance deserves special attention.
A player who contributes to scoring, playmaking, rebounding, and defense can affect a game without leading any one category.
Barnes’ all-around contribution was especially valuable because Toronto needed defensive stops during the final moments.
Why LaMelo Ball Still Had a Strong Statistical Game
Ball’s 20 points and 8 assists gave Charlotte a major offensive contribution.
His seven free throws made were also important because Charlotte needed reliable scoring while struggling from three-point range.
However, his 6-for-19 field-goal shooting illustrates the difference between volume and efficiency.
Ball created offense and scored 20 points, but the Hornets needed more efficient conversion from their primary creators to overcome Toronto’s shooting advantage.
A Closer Look at Kon Knueppel
Knueppel’s 24 points were an important positive for Charlotte.
He shot 9-for-16 from the field and 4-for-10 from three-point range. His 7 rebounds and 3 steals added value beyond scoring.
Most importantly, he was one of the few Charlotte players who combined meaningful scoring volume with reasonable efficiency.
His performance demonstrates why individual efficiency should always be considered alongside total points.
A 24-point game on 16 field-goal attempts tells a different story from a 24-point game requiring 25 or 26 attempts.
What This Game Teaches About Reading NBA Box Scores
The toronto raptors vs charlotte hornets match player stats offer several useful lessons for anyone trying to understand NBA games beyond the final score.
1. Shooting percentage can outweigh raw volume
Charlotte attempted nearly as many field goals as Toronto, but Toronto converted a much higher percentage.
2. Three-point makes need context
Both teams made 10 threes. Toronto needed only 25 attempts, while Charlotte needed 40.
3. Rebounding does not automatically produce victory
Charlotte collected five more total rebounds and six more offensive rebounds, yet Toronto still won.
4. Assists reveal offensive structure
Toronto’s 25 assists compared with Charlotte’s 19 suggest more shared offensive creation.
5. Late-game plays can override full-game averages
Barrett’s basket and Barnes’ final block were decisive even though the overall statistical differences were relatively small.
6. Defensive statistics deserve equal attention
Ingram’s three blocks and Barnes’ final block were central to the result.
Game Context and Season Position
The game was important for both teams because their records reflected very different early-season trajectories.
Toronto entered at 9-5 and 3-2 at home. Charlotte entered at 4-10 and 1-6 on the road. Those records were confirmed in contemporary game listings.
Toronto’s victory represented its fourth consecutive win and eighth win in its previous nine games. Charlotte, meanwhile, suffered its sixth loss in seven games.
That context makes the two-point result more meaningful.
Toronto was able to win despite a weaker rebounding total and fewer free-throw attempts. Charlotte demonstrated enough defensive activity and offensive rebounding to stay in the game, but Toronto’s efficiency and late execution proved decisive.
Official Game Details
The game was played at Scotiabank Arena in Toronto, Ontario, with an announced attendance of 19,037.
The officials were Jason Goldenberg, J.B. DeRosa, and Dannica Baroody. The official NBA scorer’s report lists the game duration at 2 hours and 21 minutes.
For readers checking the original record, the official NBA game page provides the game’s box score, game charts, play-by-play information, and video highlights. NBA official game page and box score
Recommended Visuals for This Article
An original visual can make this statistical analysis easier to understand without adding unnecessary text.
A useful featured graphic could show:
- Toronto 110 vs Charlotte 108
- Brandon Ingram: 27 points
- Kon Knueppel: 24 points
- RJ Barrett: 16 points
- LaMelo Ball: 20 points
- Toronto 50% FG vs Charlotte 42.5% FG
- Toronto 40% 3PT vs Charlotte 25% 3PT
A second original chart could compare field goals, three-pointers, rebounds, assists, turnovers, steals, and blocks for both teams.
A third visual could focus on the fourth-quarter finish, showing Barrett’s go-ahead basket followed by the defensive blocks from Ingram and Barnes.
These visuals would add genuine explanatory value because they translate the box score into a quick visual summary.
Suggested Internal Links
For a sports statistics website, this article can naturally connect to related content such as:
- A guide explaining how to read NBA box scores
- A Toronto Raptors player statistics article
- A Charlotte Hornets player statistics article
- A previous Raptors game analysis
- A previous Hornets game analysis
- A page covering NBA team comparison statistics
Internal links should use descriptive anchor text rather than generic phrases such as “click here.”
FAQ
Who led the Raptors in scoring against the Hornets?
Brandon Ingram led Toronto with 27 points. He also recorded 6 rebounds, 3 assists, 2 steals, and 3 blocks.
Who led the Hornets in scoring?
Kon Knueppel led Charlotte with 24 points. Miles Bridges scored 22 and LaMelo Ball added 20.
What was the final score between Toronto and Charlotte?
The Toronto Raptors defeated the Charlotte Hornets 110-108.
Who had the most rebounds in the game?
Immanuel Quickley and Ryan Kalkbrenner each finished with 10 rebounds, making them the joint leaders in total rebounds.
How many points did LaMelo Ball score?
LaMelo Ball scored 20 points and recorded 8 assists for Charlotte.
Why did Toronto win the game?
Toronto’s 50% field-goal shooting and 40% three-point shooting gave the Raptors a major efficiency advantage. Toronto also had 25 assists and made the key plays during the final possessions.
Conclusion
The toronto raptors vs charlotte hornets match player stats show a game that was much closer than Toronto’s shooting efficiency might initially suggest.
Toronto won 110-108 because it converted its field-goal opportunities at a significantly higher rate, shot 40% from three-point range, moved the ball effectively, and executed under pressure late in the fourth quarter.
Brandon Ingram was the leading scorer with 27 points and also provided three blocks. RJ Barrett supplied the decisive basket with 18 seconds remaining. Scottie Barnes then closed the game defensively with a final block at the buzzer.
Charlotte had plenty of positives. Kon Knueppel scored 24 points, Miles Bridges added 22, and LaMelo Ball recorded 20 points and 8 assists. The Hornets also won the rebounding battle, generated 14 offensive rebounds, and recorded 11 steals and 9 blocks.
The biggest weakness was shooting efficiency. Charlotte made only 10 of 40 three-point attempts, while Toronto made 10 of 25. Both teams therefore made the same number of threes, but Toronto required far fewer attempts to reach that total.
That is ultimately what makes this game useful for statistical analysis. The final score was separated by only two points, but the underlying numbers reveal several different battles. Toronto won the efficiency battle and the assist battle. Charlotte won the rebounding, steals, blocks, and free-throw percentage categories. The Raptors prevailed because their advantages came in areas that produced more efficient scoring, followed by better execution when the game reached its most important possessions.
For anyone reviewing this matchup, the most useful approach is therefore not to focus on one headline number. The full box score tells a much richer story about how Toronto’s shooting, balanced creation, and late defensive execution overcame Charlotte’s rebounding edge and defensive activity.
