Cleveland Browns vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats

The cleveland browns vs philadelphia eagles match player stats from the August 16, 2025 preseason meeting tell a much more detailed story than the final score alone. Cleveland defeated Philadelphia 22-13 at Lincoln Financial Field, but the most important part of the game was how the Browns controlled the line of scrimmage, produced 331 total yards, and limited the Eagles to only 88 total yards. The Browns also converted 9 of 16 third downs, while Philadelphia managed only 4 of 12.

Because this was a preseason game, the numbers need to be viewed differently from regular-season statistics. Coaches were evaluating young players, roster depth, positional battles, and execution rather than simply trying to maximize the final score. Even so, the individual performances provide useful clues about which players made the strongest impression.

Dillon Gabriel was one of the most closely watched Browns players. The rookie quarterback completed 13 of 18 passes for 143 yards, while Pierre Strong Jr. provided Cleveland with a major rushing contribution through 89 yards on 13 carries. On the Philadelphia side, Kyle McCord completed 8 of 16 passes for 47 yards and one touchdown, while Andrew Mukuba made one of the game’s biggest defensive plays with a 75-yard interception return for a touchdown.

The official NFL schedule confirms the Browns’ 22-13 preseason victory over Philadelphia on August 16, 2025.

Cleveland Browns vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats at a Glance

The final score was:

Cleveland Browns 22, Philadelphia Eagles 13

The game produced a clear statistical advantage for Cleveland.

Category	Cleveland Browns	Philadelphia Eagles
Final Score	22	13
Total First Downs	15	8
Passing First Downs	10	5
Rushing First Downs	5	3
Total Yards	331	88
Passing Yards	199	55
Rushing Yards	132	33
Offensive Plays	63	44
Average Yards per Play	5.3	2.0
Third Down	9/16	4/12
Turnovers	1	1
Sacks Allowed	3	1
Punts	3	7
Time of Possession	35:57	24:03

The difference in offensive production is particularly striking. Cleveland gained 331 total yards on 63 offensive plays, while Philadelphia produced only 88 yards on 44 plays.

That means Cleveland averaged 5.3 yards per offensive play compared with only 2.0 for Philadelphia. The Browns also held the ball for almost 12 additional minutes.

These numbers provide important context for understanding the individual performances.

Dillon Gabriel’s Passing Performance

13 Completions on 18 Attempts

Dillon Gabriel entered the game with significant attention on him, and his performance was a mixture of strong execution and one major mistake.

Gabriel finished with:

• 13 completions
• 18 attempts
• 143 passing yards
• 7.9 yards per attempt
• 0 passing touchdowns
• 1 interception
• 2 sacks
• 72.2 passer rating

His completion percentage was 72.2%, which was one of the strongest individual passing numbers in the game.

Gabriel’s ability to consistently complete passes helped Cleveland sustain drives. The Browns did not depend on explosive passing plays throughout the afternoon. Instead, they combined efficient short and intermediate passing with a productive rushing attack.

The most important negative was the interception. Gabriel’s turnover became particularly costly because it was returned for a defensive touchdown.

That distinction matters when evaluating the quarterback’s performance. His basic passing efficiency was respectable, but the turnover directly contributed to Philadelphia’s scoring.

NFL.com’s postgame analysis similarly highlighted the contrast in Gabriel’s performance, noting that he opened strongly before throwing an interception that was returned for a touchdown.

What Gabriel’s Numbers Really Show

A simple box-score reading could produce two very different conclusions.

One interpretation is that Gabriel played well because he completed more than 72% of his passes and generated 143 yards.

Another interpretation is that the interception exposes an important weakness.

Both observations can be true.

For a young quarterback, preseason games are valuable because they expose decisions that might not be obvious during controlled practice sessions. Gabriel demonstrated confidence and accuracy, but the turnover showed that maintaining ball security under pressure remains an important part of his development.

Tyler Huntley’s Efficient Relief Performance

Tyler Huntley also contributed to Cleveland’s quarterback production.

His numbers were:

• 10 completions
• 13 attempts
• 71 yards
• 5.5 yards per attempt
• 0 touchdowns
• 0 interceptions
• 1 sack
• 88.9 passer rating

Huntley did not produce the same yardage total as Gabriel, but he protected the football.

That is an important contrast.

Gabriel produced more yardage and displayed a higher volume of passing production, while Huntley finished without an interception and posted the better passer rating.

The Browns therefore received two different types of quarterback contributions.

Gabriel provided more offensive volume, while Huntley delivered a cleaner statistical performance in limited action.

Cleveland’s Rushing Attack Was the Difference

One of the clearest themes in the cleveland browns vs philadelphia eagles match player stats was Cleveland’s advantage on the ground.

The Browns finished with:

• 29 rushing attempts
• 132 rushing yards
• 4.6 yards per carry
• 1 rushing touchdown
• 54-yard longest run

Philadelphia, meanwhile, had:

• 19 rushing attempts
• 33 rushing yards
• 1.7 yards per carry
• 0 rushing touchdowns
• 8-yard longest run

That is a major difference.

Cleveland averaged nearly three more yards per rushing attempt than Philadelphia.

The Browns also had a 99-yard advantage in rushing yardage.

This allowed Cleveland to control the pace of the game and reduce the amount of pressure placed on its quarterbacks.

Pierre Strong Jr. Leads Cleveland’s Ground Game

Pierre Strong Jr. was the standout Browns runner.

He recorded:

• 13 carries
• 89 yards
• 6.8 yards per carry
• 0 touchdowns
• 54-yard long

His 54-yard run was the longest rushing play of the game.

Strong’s 89 yards accounted for a significant portion of Cleveland’s 132 rushing yards. His 6.8-yard average also shows that the production was not simply the result of repeated short gains.

The long run had a major effect on his overall statistics, but that should not diminish the importance of his workload. He received 13 carries, giving the coaching staff enough opportunities to evaluate him in a meaningful game environment.

From a roster evaluation standpoint, that combination of workload, efficiency, and explosiveness is exactly the type of preseason performance that can attract attention.

Philadelphia’s Rushing Numbers Were Limited

Montrell Johnson Jr. was Philadelphia’s leading rusher.

He finished with:

• 6 carries
• 20 yards
• 3.3 yards per carry
• 0 touchdowns
• 6-yard long

Johnson led the Eagles in rushing, but the overall team rushing performance was poor.

Philadelphia’s 33 rushing yards on 19 attempts produced only 1.7 yards per carry.

That limited production created problems for the passing game because the Eagles were unable to consistently establish balance.

When a team averages only 1.7 yards per rushing attempt, sustaining drives becomes much harder. Short runs frequently create unfavorable down-and-distance situations, increasing the importance of successful third-down conversions.

Philadelphia converted only 4 of 12 third downs.

Cleveland Receiving Statistics

Cleveland’s passing game distributed the ball among several receivers rather than relying heavily on one player.

The Browns recorded:

• 23 receptions
• 214 receiving yards
• 9.3 yards per reception
• 0 receiving touchdowns
• 29-yard longest reception

Kaden Davis led Cleveland’s receiving group with:

• 3 receptions
• 44 yards
• 14.7 yards per reception
• 29-yard long
• 3 targets

Gage Larvadain added:

• 3 receptions
• 43 yards

Jamari Thrash recorded:

• 4 receptions
• 43 yards

Cedric Tillman contributed:

• 1 reception
• 18 yards

This distribution is notable because Cleveland did not need one receiver to dominate the box score.

Instead, the offense consistently moved the ball through multiple targets.

That kind of distribution can be especially useful during preseason because coaches are evaluating the depth chart rather than simply feeding established starters.

Kaden Davis Provides Cleveland’s Biggest Receiving Play

Kaden Davis finished with the highest receiving yardage total for Cleveland at 44 yards.

His 29-yard reception was also the longest Browns receiving play.

The 14.7-yard average per reception suggests that his contributions were not limited to short possession routes.

Although preseason statistics should not be treated as a direct prediction of regular-season production, explosive plays remain useful when evaluating how a player performs with limited opportunities.

Davis had only three receptions, but those catches generated 44 yards.

That is a strong example of why raw reception totals do not always tell the full story.

Philadelphia’s Passing Game Struggled

Philadelphia’s team passing statistics were among the clearest indicators of the offensive problems.

The Eagles finished with:

• 13 completions
• 24 attempts
• 55 passing yards
• 2.7 yards per attempt
• 1 passing touchdown
• 1 interception
• 1 sack
• 52.1 team passer rating

The most striking figure is the 55 passing yards.

Even with a passing touchdown, Philadelphia generated very little yardage through the air.

Kyle McCord was the Eagles’ leading passer:

• 8 completions
• 16 attempts
• 47 yards
• 2.9 yards per attempt
• 1 touchdown
• 0 interceptions
• 0 sacks
• 77.1 rating

Dorian Thompson-Robinson completed:

• 5 of 8 passes
• 17 yards
• 2.1 yards per attempt
• 0 touchdowns
• 1 interception
• 1 sack
• 27.1 rating

The contrast between the two quarterbacks is substantial.

McCord’s touchdown and lack of interceptions gave him the cleaner statistical line, while Thompson-Robinson struggled to generate yardage and threw an interception.

Ainias Smith Leads Philadelphia’s Receivers

Ainias Smith was Philadelphia’s leading receiver in the game.

He recorded:

• 2 receptions
• 19 yards
• 9.5 yards per reception
• 1 touchdown
• 10-yard long
• 2 targets

His touchdown provided an important positive moment for the Eagles’ offense.

However, Philadelphia’s overall receiving production remained limited.

The team finished with only 64 receiving yards.

That means Cleveland’s defense was able to restrict Philadelphia’s passing production even when the Eagles found the end zone through the air.

Defensive Player Stats Tell Another Story

The defensive numbers add another layer to the game.

Cleveland recorded:

• 50 tackles
• 31 solo tackles
• 1 sack
• 6 tackles for loss
• 5 passes defended
• 6 quarterback hits
• 1 defensive touchdown

Philadelphia recorded:

• 72 tackles
• 49 solo tackles
• 3 sacks
• 6 tackles for loss
• 4 passes defended
• 4 quarterback hits
• 1 defensive touchdown

Philadelphia actually recorded more tackles and more sacks.

Yet Cleveland’s defense was much more successful at limiting overall offensive production.

This is an important lesson when interpreting defensive statistics.

More tackles do not necessarily mean a defense played better.

In this game, Philadelphia’s defense spent more time on the field because Cleveland ran 63 offensive plays compared with Philadelphia’s 44.

More defensive snaps naturally create more tackle opportunities.

KJ Henry’s Defensive Touchdown

KJ Henry created one of Cleveland’s biggest defensive moments.

He recorded:

• 1 interception
• 45 return yards
• 1 defensive touchdown

The interception return for 45 yards gave Cleveland a defensive score and helped compensate for the offensive turnover thrown by Gabriel.

This created an unusual statistical balance.

Gabriel threw an interception that Philadelphia returned for a touchdown, while Henry intercepted a Philadelphia pass and returned it for a touchdown.

Both teams therefore scored defensive touchdowns.

The difference was that Cleveland produced substantially more offensive yardage around those defensive plays.

Andrew Mukuba’s 75-Yard Interception Return

Andrew Mukuba delivered Philadelphia’s biggest defensive play.

He recorded:

• 1 interception
• 75 interception return yards
• 1 defensive touchdown
• 1 fumble recovery

The 75-yard return was one of the most explosive individual plays of the game.

Mukuba’s performance demonstrates why preseason defensive statistics can be particularly valuable for players competing for roster roles.

A defensive back does not need a large number of snaps to create a major impact. One correctly diagnosed route, good positioning, and strong open-field running can completely change a game.

Mukuba’s interception return for a touchdown gave Philadelphia a major scoring opportunity and demonstrated his ability to turn defense into offense.

Why Cleveland Won the Statistical Battle

The final score was 22-13, but Cleveland’s advantage becomes clearer when the underlying numbers are compared.

Total Offense

Cleveland: 331 yards

Philadelphia: 88 yards

Difference: 243 yards

That is an enormous gap.

Rushing

Cleveland: 132 yards

Philadelphia: 33 yards

Difference: 99 yards

Passing

Cleveland: 199 net passing yards

Philadelphia: 55 net passing yards

Difference: 144 yards

First Downs

Cleveland: 15

Philadelphia: 8

Difference: 7

Third Downs

Cleveland: 9 of 16

Philadelphia: 4 of 12

Cleveland converted 56.3% of its third downs.

Philadelphia converted only 33.3%.

These numbers explain why Cleveland controlled the game.

The Browns were better at maintaining drives, generating yardage, and staying on the field.

Time of Possession Favored Cleveland

Cleveland controlled the ball for 35:57.

Philadelphia had possession for 24:03.

The difference was 11 minutes and 54 seconds.

Time of possession by itself does not determine who wins a football game. A team can possess the ball for a long time without producing points.

However, in this particular matchup, the possession advantage was connected to meaningful offensive production.

Cleveland ran 63 plays compared with Philadelphia’s 44.

That gave the Browns more opportunities to gain yards, convert third downs, and put points on the scoreboard.

Special Teams Statistics

Special teams also played a meaningful role.

Cleveland Kick Returns

Cleveland recorded:

• 3 returns
• 98 yards
• 32.7 yards per return
• 38-yard long

Philadelphia recorded:

• 4 returns
• 94 yards
• 23.5 yards per return
• 28-yard long

Cleveland therefore averaged 9.2 more yards per kickoff return.

That difference can influence field position and reduce the amount of distance an offense needs to travel.

Cleveland Punt Returns

Gage Larvadain handled five punt returns for Cleveland.

He produced:

• 5 returns
• 36 yards
• 7.2 yards per return
• 16-yard long

Philadelphia’s punt return totals were:

• 2 returns
• 21 yards
• 10.5 yards per return

Avery Williams returned one punt for 11 yards, while Ainias Smith returned another for 10 yards.

Cleveland’s Kicking Was Perfect

Cleveland made all three of its field-goal attempts.

Andre Szmyt went:

• 2 of 2 on field goals
• Long of 49 yards
• 1 of 1 on extra points
• 7 total points

Dustin Hopkins added:

• 1 of 1 on field goals
• Long of 46 yards
• 3 points

As a team, Cleveland finished 3 of 3 on field goals.

That was important because the Browns converted several scoring opportunities without needing touchdowns.

Philadelphia did not make a field goal.

Jake Elliott recorded one point, while the Eagles finished 0 of 0 on field-goal attempts.

Punting Comparison

Corey Bojorquez punted three times for Cleveland.

His numbers were:

• 3 punts
• 148 total yards
• 49.3-yard average
• 59-yard long
• 0 touchbacks
• 0 inside the 20

Philadelphia’s Braden Mann punted seven times.

His numbers were:

• 7 punts
• 366 total yards
• 52.3-yard average
• 67-yard long
• 1 touchback
• 3 inside the 20

The higher number of Philadelphia punts reflects the Eagles’ offensive struggles.

Seven punts compared with Cleveland’s three is a clear sign that Philadelphia struggled to sustain possessions.

Turnovers and Field Position

Each team recorded one interception.

Cleveland also lost one fumble.

Philadelphia recovered one fumble and returned an interception for a touchdown.

Cleveland’s KJ Henry returned his interception 45 yards for a touchdown.

Philadelphia’s Andrew Mukuba returned his interception 75 yards for a touchdown.

This makes the turnover statistics particularly interesting.

Neither team dominated the other in interceptions, but both teams converted defensive mistakes into touchdowns.

The major difference was what happened between those turnover plays.

Cleveland generated 331 total yards while Philadelphia managed only 88.

Third-Down Efficiency Was a Major Factor

Third-down performance is one of the most useful ways to understand why Cleveland controlled this game.

The Browns converted 9 of 16 third-down attempts.

That equals 56.3%.

Philadelphia converted 4 of 12.

That equals 33.3%.

Cleveland therefore stayed on the field far more consistently.

Successful third-down execution can extend drives, create additional offensive plays, and wear down a defense.

It also explains why Cleveland had 15 first downs compared with eight for Philadelphia.

Red-Zone Performance

The teams had very different red-zone profiles.

Cleveland went 1 of 3 in the red zone.

Philadelphia went 1 of 1.

At first glance, Philadelphia’s 100% red-zone efficiency appears better.

However, the Eagles reached the red zone only once.

Cleveland reached it three times.

The Browns compensated for their red-zone inefficiency by making all three field-goal attempts.

That produced a useful scoring balance.

Instead of relying entirely on touchdowns, Cleveland converted field-position advantages into points through its kicking game.

What the Stats Say About Cleveland

The most important takeaway from the Cleveland side is offensive balance.

The Browns did not need extraordinary quarterback production to win.

They gained 132 rushing yards and 199 net passing yards.

That balance created 331 total yards.

The team also protected possession enough to maintain control despite Gabriel’s interception.

Pierre Strong Jr.’s 89 rushing yards gave the offense an explosive component, while multiple receivers contributed to the passing game.

The Browns also received strong special teams production and a defensive touchdown.

That combination produced a complete preseason performance.

What the Stats Say About Philadelphia

Philadelphia’s biggest problem was offensive efficiency.

The Eagles generated only 88 total yards.

Their 55 net passing yards and 33 rushing yards demonstrate that neither phase of the offense consistently moved the football.

McCord produced the team’s only passing touchdown, while Ainias Smith scored the touchdown.

But Philadelphia’s offense struggled to create sustained drives.

The four third-down conversions on 12 attempts are another important indicator.

The defense produced three sacks and a defensive touchdown, so Philadelphia did have positive moments.

However, the offense did not provide enough support.

Preseason Context Matters

It would be a mistake to treat these statistics as a direct prediction of regular-season performance.

Preseason football has a different purpose.

Coaches use these games to evaluate:

• Young quarterbacks
• Backup running backs
• Receiver depth
• Defensive backs
• Special teams players
• Roster competition
• Scheme execution
• Situational football

Starters may receive limited playing time or sit out entirely.

Players can also receive opportunities that they would not normally receive during a regular-season game.

Therefore, the most useful question is not simply, “Who had the best numbers?”

A better question is:

Which players used their opportunities most effectively?

That is where the individual statistics become more meaningful.

Most Important Cleveland Player Performances

Several Browns players stood out statistically.

Dillon Gabriel

Gabriel’s 13-of-18 passing line showed accuracy and volume.

His 143 yards were the highest passing total in the game.

The interception remains the major negative.

Pierre Strong Jr.

Strong’s 89 rushing yards and 54-yard long run made him Cleveland’s most productive ball carrier.

His 6.8-yard average was also excellent.

Kaden Davis

Davis produced 44 receiving yards and Cleveland’s longest reception.

His 29-yard catch showed big-play ability.

KJ Henry

Henry produced a 45-yard interception return for a touchdown.

That was one of Cleveland’s most important defensive moments.

Andre Szmyt

Szmyt converted both of his field-goal attempts and his extra point.

His 49-yard field goal demonstrated useful range.

Most Important Philadelphia Player Performances

Philadelphia also had several players worth highlighting.

Kyle McCord

McCord completed 8 of 16 passes for 47 yards and one touchdown.

He avoided an interception and finished with a 77.1 rating.

Ainias Smith

Smith caught two passes for 19 yards and scored Philadelphia’s receiving touchdown.

He also contributed on special teams.

Andrew Mukuba

Mukuba was arguably the most explosive Philadelphia defender.

His interception return covered 75 yards and resulted in a touchdown.

He also recorded a fumble recovery.

Braden Mann

Mann punted seven times for 366 yards.

His 52.3-yard average and three punts inside the 20 helped Philadelphia’s field-position battle.

Cleveland Browns vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats: What Should Readers Focus On?

When reviewing a preseason box score, it is easy to focus on touchdowns and passing yards.

A stronger evaluation looks at several layers.

First, examine efficiency.

Gabriel’s 13 completions on 18 attempts were efficient, while Strong averaged 6.8 yards per carry.

Second, look at opportunities.

Strong received 13 carries, while Davis received only three catches.

Third, consider mistakes.

Gabriel threw an interception and lost a fumble, while the Browns defense produced an interception touchdown.

Fourth, examine team context.

Cleveland’s 331 total yards and 9-of-16 third-down performance provided a much stronger foundation than Philadelphia’s 88 yards and 4-of-12 third-down rate.

Finally, remember the preseason environment.

A strong performance can increase a player’s chances of earning additional opportunities, but one game should not be treated as definitive evidence of future regular-season success.

Key Statistical Lessons From the Game

There are several useful lessons hidden inside the box score.

1. Efficiency Can Matter More Than Volume

Gabriel’s 143 yards came on 18 attempts.

Strong’s 89 rushing yards came on 13 carries.

Both players generated meaningful production without enormous workloads.

2. Explosive Plays Change Games

Strong’s 54-yard run, Henry’s 45-yard interception return, and Mukuba’s 75-yard interception return were among the biggest individual plays.

Explosive plays can distort box-score averages, but they also demonstrate game-changing ability.

3. Third Down Creates Offensive Stability

Cleveland converted more than half of its third downs.

Philadelphia converted only one-third.

That difference helped determine possession time and total offensive plays.

4. Defensive Scores Can Offset Offensive Mistakes

Gabriel’s interception produced a Philadelphia defensive touchdown.

Henry’s interception produced a Cleveland defensive touchdown.

Cleveland’s defense therefore helped erase the impact of its quarterback’s mistake.

5. Field Goals Still Matter

Cleveland made all three field-goal attempts.

Those 10 kicking points helped turn drives into tangible scoring opportunities.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Cleveland Browns vs Philadelphia Eagles preseason game?

The Cleveland Browns defeated the Philadelphia Eagles 22-13 on August 16, 2025, at Lincoln Financial Field.

Who was Cleveland’s leading passer?

Dillon Gabriel was Cleveland’s leading passer. He completed 13 of 18 attempts for 143 yards, with no touchdowns and one interception.

Who was Cleveland’s leading rusher?

Pierre Strong Jr. led Cleveland with 89 rushing yards on 13 carries. He averaged 6.8 yards per carry and had a 54-yard run.

Who was Philadelphia’s leading passer?

Kyle McCord led Philadelphia in passing, completing 8 of 16 attempts for 47 yards and one touchdown.

Who scored defensive touchdowns in the game?

KJ Henry returned an interception 45 yards for a Cleveland touchdown, while Andrew Mukuba returned an interception 75 yards for a Philadelphia touchdown.

How many total yards did each team record?

Cleveland produced 331 total yards, while Philadelphia finished with 88 total yards. The Browns therefore held a 243-yard advantage.

Conclusion

The cleveland browns vs philadelphia eagles match player stats show a game in which Cleveland’s overall offensive efficiency separated the teams.

The Browns produced 331 total yards compared with Philadelphia’s 88. They also dominated the rushing battle 132 to 33, generated 15 first downs to Philadelphia’s eight, and converted 9 of 16 third downs.

Dillon Gabriel delivered the highest passing total of the game with 143 yards, although his interception and lost fumble showed areas that still required improvement. Tyler Huntley provided a cleaner passing performance without an interception.

Pierre Strong Jr. was Cleveland’s leading rusher with 89 yards on 13 carries, including a 54-yard run. Kaden Davis led the Browns in receiving yards with 44, while KJ Henry supplied a major defensive contribution with a 45-yard interception return touchdown.

Philadelphia’s best individual moments came from Kyle McCord, Ainias Smith, and Andrew Mukuba. McCord threw for 47 yards and a touchdown, Smith scored the Eagles’ receiving touchdown, and Mukuba produced a spectacular 75-yard interception return for a touchdown.

Ultimately, the numbers show that Cleveland won because it consistently moved the football, controlled possession, ran efficiently, and converted third downs. Philadelphia’s defense created several important plays, but the offense struggled to generate enough yardage to keep pace.

For anyone studying preseason player performance, this game is a useful reminder that the most meaningful statistics are not always the most obvious ones. Completion rate, yards per carry, third-down efficiency, explosive plays, turnovers, and total offensive volume together provide a much clearer picture than the final score alone.