Los Angeles Rams vs Atlanta Falcons Match Player Stats
The los angeles rams vs atlanta falcons match player stats tell a much more detailed story than the final 27-24 score alone. Atlanta defeated Los Angeles after building a 21-point halftime advantage, surviving a major Rams comeback, and then taking the lead for good on Zane Gonzalez’s late field goal. The game was played on Monday, December 29, 2025, although some listings can show December 30 because of date and timezone handling. The Falcons finished with 219 rushing yards, while the Rams produced 115, and Matthew Stafford threw three interceptions in a game where Los Angeles otherwise generated 363 total yards.
For anyone studying the los angeles rams vs atlanta falcons match player stats, the most important numbers are not simply passing yards or the final score. Atlanta controlled the game through Bijan Robinson’s explosive rushing performance, Kirk Cousins’ efficient passing, and three interceptions of Stafford. Los Angeles then changed the shape of the contest in the second half, scoring 24 points after being shut out through two quarters.
This breakdown examines the passing, rushing, receiving, defensive, special teams, scoring, and team-level statistics from the matchup. It also explains what the numbers reveal about how the game developed.
Los Angeles Rams vs Atlanta Falcons Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The final score was:
Atlanta Falcons 27, Los Angeles Rams 24
The Rams entered the game with an 11-5 record and a 5-4 road record. Atlanta entered at 7-9 overall and 3-4 at home. Despite the difference in records, the Falcons established control early and forced Los Angeles to spend much of the game playing from behind.
Final Score by Quarter
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| Los Angeles Rams | 0 | 0 | 17 | 7 | 24 |
| Atlanta Falcons | 7 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 27 |
The quarter-by-quarter numbers immediately explain why this game felt like two different contests.
Atlanta led 21-0 at halftime.
Los Angeles then scored 17 points in the third quarter and added another touchdown in the fourth. The Rams eventually moved within one point at 24-23 before Gonzalez’s late field goal restored Atlanta’s lead.
The Rams actually finished with more total yards, 363 to 345. Los Angeles also had 61 offensive plays compared with Atlanta’s 53. Yet the Falcons won because they converted their offensive opportunities more effectively and protected the football.
Matthew Stafford Passing Stats
Matthew Stafford’s passing line was one of the defining parts of the game.
| Statistic | Matthew Stafford |
| Completions | 22 |
| Attempts | 38 |
| Completion Rate | 57.9% |
| Passing Yards | 269 |
| Yards per Attempt | 7.1 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 3 |
| Sacks | 3 |
| Passer Rating | 64.5 |
Stafford completed 22 of 38 passes for 269 yards and two touchdowns, but three interceptions significantly affected the game.
The most important issue was not simply that Stafford threw interceptions. It was when those turnovers occurred.
Atlanta used the turnovers to maintain pressure on the Rams during a first half in which Los Angeles failed to score. Stafford threw two first-half interceptions, including a pick-six, while Atlanta also generated pressure without relying heavily on exotic blitzing.
That combination created a difficult situation for Los Angeles.
The Rams had enough offensive production to make a comeback, but three interceptions meant several promising possessions ended without points.
Stafford’s Second-Half Response
The second half showed why raw quarterback statistics need context.
Stafford helped lead a dramatic rally after halftime. Los Angeles scored 17 points in the third quarter and seven more in the fourth. He connected with Terrance Ferguson for a touchdown and later found Puka Nacua for another score.
The comeback demonstrated that the Rams’ passing offense could still create explosive plays against Atlanta.
The problem was that the early deficit and turnovers left almost no room for error.
Stafford’s third interception came in the fourth quarter, and Los Angeles ultimately failed to score on its final possession after Atlanta reclaimed the lead.
Kirk Cousins Passing Stats
Kirk Cousins had a very different statistical profile.
| Statistic | Kirk Cousins |
| Completions | 13 |
| Attempts | 20 |
| Completion Rate | 65.0% |
| Passing Yards | 126 |
| Yards per Attempt | 6.3 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 99.2 |
Cousins completed 13 of 20 passes for 126 yards and one touchdown without throwing an interception or taking a sack. His passer rating was 99.2.
His yardage total was modest compared with Stafford’s, but Atlanta did not need Cousins to throw for 300 yards.
The Falcons established their offensive identity through Robinson and the running game. Cousins then operated efficiently enough to keep the offense moving and punish defensive attention toward the backfield.
This is one of the clearest lessons from the los angeles rams vs atlanta falcons match player stats: more passing yards did not automatically translate into more offensive success.
Bijan Robinson Dominated the Ground Game
If one individual statistic best explains Atlanta’s victory, it is Bijan Robinson’s rushing performance.
| Statistic | Bijan Robinson |
| Carries | 22 |
| Rushing Yards | 195 |
| Average | 8.9 |
| Longest Run | 93 yards |
| Rushing TDs | 1 |
| Receptions | 5 |
| Receiving Yards | 34 |
| Receiving TDs | 1 |
| Total Scrimmage Yards | 229 |
Robinson ran 22 times for 195 yards, averaging 8.9 yards per carry. His longest run went for 93 yards and resulted in a touchdown.
He also caught five passes for 34 yards and another touchdown, giving him 229 total scrimmage yards.
Robinson’s 195 rushing yards were the most by a Falcons ball carrier since 2008. His 93-yard touchdown run was also the longest touchdown run in Falcons franchise history.
That performance fundamentally changed how the Rams had to defend Atlanta.
The 93-Yard Touchdown
The 93-yard touchdown was particularly important because it was not simply a late-game statistical addition.
It helped Atlanta build its early advantage.
Robinson broke through the defense and turned a normal rushing situation into a huge scoring play. The touchdown increased the Falcons’ lead and put even more pressure on a Rams offense that was already struggling to produce points.
When an offense can repeatedly generate explosive rushing plays, the quarterback does not have to carry the entire workload.
That was exactly the dynamic Atlanta created.
Rams Rushing Statistics
Los Angeles had a productive rushing performance in terms of efficiency, but it did not produce a rushing touchdown.
| Rams Rusher | Carries | Yards | Average | TD |
| Kyren Williams | 13 | 92 | 7.1 | 0 |
| Blake Corum | 6 | 18 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Ronnie Rivers | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Team | 20 | 115 | 5.8 | 0 |
Kyren Williams was the leading Rams rusher with 92 yards on 13 attempts.
His 7.1-yard average was excellent, and his longest run went for 22 yards.
That makes the Rams’ offensive output even more interesting. Los Angeles averaged 5.8 yards per rushing attempt, while Atlanta averaged 6.6.
The Rams were not completely ineffective on the ground.
Instead, the biggest difference was volume and scoring impact.
Atlanta ran the ball 33 times for 219 yards and one touchdown. Los Angeles ran 20 times for 115 yards with no rushing touchdowns.
Los Angeles Receiving Statistics
The Rams spread the football around more than the Falcons did.
| Rams Receiver | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD |
| Xavier Smith | 4 | 67 | 16.8 | 0 |
| Terrance Ferguson | 2 | 54 | 27.0 | 1 |
| Colby Parkinson | 6 | 53 | 8.8 | 0 |
| Puka Nacua | 5 | 47 | 9.4 | 1 |
| Kyren Williams | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 0 |
| Konata Mumpfield | 2 | 10 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Tutu Atwell | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
The team finished with 22 receptions for 269 receiving yards and two touchdowns.
Xavier Smith
Xavier Smith led Los Angeles in receiving yardage with 67 yards on four receptions.
His 16.8-yard average indicates that his contributions came through relatively productive chunks of field position rather than a high volume of short completions.
Terrance Ferguson
Terrance Ferguson produced one of the most efficient receiving lines of the night.
He caught two passes for 54 yards, averaging 27.0 yards per reception, and scored one touchdown.
His 27-yard touchdown reception from Stafford became an important part of the Rams’ second-half comeback.
Colby Parkinson
Parkinson led the Rams in receptions with six.
He finished with 53 yards, giving him an 8.8-yard average.
His six catches show that Stafford frequently used the middle and shorter areas of the passing game while trying to keep drives alive.
Puka Nacua
Puka Nacua caught five passes for 47 yards and one touchdown.
He also received 10 targets, the highest total among Rams receivers in the supplied box-score data.
His fourth-quarter touchdown helped Los Angeles cut Atlanta’s advantage to 24-23.
That reception was important because it showed that the Rams still had enough offensive firepower to make the game competitive despite the difficult opening half.
Atlanta Receiving Statistics
Atlanta’s receiving production was much smaller in volume.
| Falcons Receiver | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD |
| David Sills V | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 0 |
| Darnell Mooney | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 0 |
| Bijan Robinson | 5 | 34 | 6.8 | 1 |
| Kyle Pitts Sr. | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 0 |
| Drake London | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 |
Atlanta finished with 13 receptions for 126 yards and one touchdown.
Robinson’s five receptions made him an important part of the passing game as well as the rushing attack.
That dual-threat workload produced 229 total scrimmage yards.
The Falcons therefore did not need a high-volume receiving performance from their wide receivers. Their offense was built around a more concentrated distribution of touches.
Team Offensive Comparison
The overall offensive numbers provide an important contrast.
| Category | Rams | Falcons |
| Total Yards | 363 | 345 |
| Passing | 248 net team yards | 126 |
| Rushing | 115 | 219 |
| Total Plays | 61 | 53 |
| Yards per Play | 6.0 | 6.5 |
| First Downs | 16 | 15 |
| Third Down | 5/13 | 5/13 |
| Turnovers | 3 | 0 |
| Possession | 30:15 | 29:45 |
The Rams actually gained more total yards.
This is one of the most useful points when interpreting the los angeles rams vs atlanta falcons match player stats.
A box score can show a team gaining 363 yards and still losing because turnovers, defensive touchdowns, explosive plays, and scoring efficiency can outweigh total yardage.
Atlanta gained 345 yards, 18 fewer than Los Angeles.
But the Falcons committed zero turnovers while forcing three.
That turnover margin was decisive.
Defensive Player Statistics
The Rams and Falcons produced different defensive profiles.
Rams Defensive Leaders
| Player | Tackles | Solo | Other |
| Kam Curl | 9 | 6 | |
| Omar Speights | 8 | 2 | |
| Byron Young | 8 | 2 | 1 TFL, 3 QB hits |
| Jared Verse | 6 | 3 | 1 TFL, 1 PD, 1 QB hit, 1 TD |
Kam Curl led the Rams with nine tackles.
Omar Speights and Byron Young each recorded eight tackles.
Young also generated three quarterback hits, while Jared Verse recorded a tackle for loss, pass defense, quarterback hit, and a defensive touchdown.
The Rams’ defense finished with 75 total tackles and seven quarterback hits but recorded no sacks.
Jared Verse’s Defensive Touchdown
Verse’s defensive touchdown was one of the most unusual plays of the game.
He blocked a Falcons field-goal attempt and returned the blocked kick 76 yards for a touchdown.
That play gave Los Angeles a critical scoring boost during the comeback.
It also demonstrates why special teams and defensive scoring must be considered when analyzing player statistics.
A player can influence the final score without recording a traditional offensive touchdown.
Falcons Defensive Leaders
Atlanta’s defense recorded three interceptions and three sacks.
| Player | Tackles | Solo | Other |
| Divine Deablo | 10 | 7 | |
| A.J. Terrell Jr. | 7 | 6 | 2 PD |
| Jessie Bates III | 7 | 4 | 1 PD, 1 TD |
| Xavier Watts | 5 | 4 | 3 PD |
Divine Deablo led Atlanta with 10 tackles.
A.J. Terrell Jr. recorded seven tackles and two passes defended.
Jessie Bates III added seven tackles, a pass defense, and a defensive touchdown.
Xavier Watts recorded five tackles and three passes defended while intercepting Stafford twice.
Xavier Watts and Jessie Bates III
The three Falcons interceptions were split between two defensive backs.
Xavier Watts recorded two interceptions for 32 return yards.
Jessie Bates III recorded one interception for 34 return yards and returned one interception for a touchdown.
Together, the interceptions accounted for three of Atlanta’s biggest defensive plays.
The Falcons finished with three interceptions and 66 interception-return yards.
Turnovers Changed the Game
Turnovers are probably the clearest statistical separator between the teams.
The Rams:
- Threw 3 interceptions
- Lost 0 fumbles
- Finished with 3 total turnovers
The Falcons:
- Threw 0 interceptions
- Lost 0 fumbles
- Finished with 0 total turnovers
This produced a plus-three turnover margin for Atlanta.
That is especially significant because the Rams otherwise produced more total yards and more offensive plays.
The Falcons received three additional possessions through interceptions and converted those opportunities into a major competitive advantage.
In a three-point game, giving the opponent three additional possessions through interceptions is an enormous statistical disadvantage.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams also contributed meaningful points.
Rams Kicking
Harrison Mevis finished:
- 1-for-1 on field goals
- Long of 35 yards
- 3-for-3 on extra points
- 5 total points
Falcons Kicking
Zane Gonzalez finished:
- 2-for-3 on field goals
- Long of 56 yards
- 3-for-3 on extra points
- 10 total points
The most important kick came late.
Gonzalez connected from 51 yards with 21 seconds remaining to give Atlanta a 27-24 lead.
Punting
Rams punter Ethan Evans recorded two punts for 90 yards, averaging 45.0 yards per punt, with one inside the 20.
Falcons punter Bradley Pinion recorded five punts for 246 yards, averaging 49.2 yards, with three inside the 20.
The Falcons’ greater punt volume reflects how their offensive possessions developed across the game.
The Biggest Statistical Mismatch
The clearest mismatch was Atlanta’s rushing attack.
The Falcons produced:
219 rushing yards
The Rams produced:
115 rushing yards
That is a difference of 104 rushing yards.
Robinson alone produced 195 rushing yards.
That means Robinson’s rushing total was greater than the entire Rams rushing total by 80 yards.
This is not merely a large individual performance. It represents a fundamental difference in how effectively the two teams controlled the line of scrimmage and generated explosive runs.
Why the Rams Came Back
The Rams’ second-half comeback was not random.
Several statistics explain it.
First, Stafford continued to throw aggressively.
Second, Los Angeles found productive receiving plays from Ferguson and Nacua.
Third, Kyren Williams provided explosive runs, finishing with 92 yards on only 13 attempts.
Fourth, Jared Verse’s blocked-field-goal return produced a defensive touchdown.
The Rams therefore received contributions from multiple phases of the team.
Their third-quarter 17-point explosion dramatically changed the game.
But the earlier deficit was too large to erase completely.
Why Atlanta Held On
Atlanta’s victory came from several complementary factors.
1. Robinson Created Explosive Plays
His 93-yard touchdown instantly changed field position and scoring probability.
2. Cousins Protected the Football
Cousins threw one touchdown without an interception.
3. The Falcons Forced Three Turnovers
Watts and Bates repeatedly disrupted Stafford’s passing attack.
4. Atlanta Ran Efficiently
The Falcons averaged 6.6 yards per rushing attempt.
5. Gonzalez Delivered Late
His 51-yard field goal restored the lead with 21 seconds left.
6. The Defense Survived the Comeback
Atlanta surrendered 24 points but did enough late to prevent Los Angeles from completing the comeback.
These factors are more revealing than simply saying that Atlanta “scored more points.”
A Closer Look at Offensive Efficiency
The Rams had 61 plays compared with 53 for Atlanta.
That is eight additional offensive plays.
Yet the Falcons gained 345 yards on 53 plays, while the Rams gained 363 on 61.
Atlanta therefore averaged 6.5 yards per play compared with 6.0 for Los Angeles.
That difference may appear small, but it becomes significant when combined with turnovers.
The Rams had more opportunities but failed to convert enough of them into points.
Atlanta had fewer plays but generated explosive gains, particularly on the ground.
Third-Down Performance Was Even
Both teams converted five of 13 third downs.
That means neither offense had a clear statistical advantage on third down.
The bigger differences came elsewhere.
Atlanta’s offense:
- Ran the ball more often
- Avoided turnovers
- Generated explosive rushing plays
- Scored 21 first-half points
Los Angeles:
- Had more total offensive plays
- Gained more total yards
- Threw for considerably more passing yardage
- But committed three turnovers
This is a useful reminder that individual categories should be read together rather than separately.
Red-Zone Numbers
The teams were also close in red-zone efficiency.
Los Angeles finished 1-for-3 in the red zone.
Atlanta finished 1-for-2.
Those numbers show that the game was not simply decided by repeated red-zone dominance.
Instead, Atlanta benefited from scoring outside conventional red-zone possessions.
Robinson’s 93-yard touchdown and Bates’ defensive touchdown were particularly important examples.
What the Player Stats Reveal About the Game
The most interesting feature of the los angeles rams vs atlanta falcons match player stats is the contrast between traditional offensive production and actual game control.
Stafford threw for 269 yards.
Cousins threw for 126.
The Rams gained 363 total yards.
Atlanta gained 345.
The Rams had 61 offensive plays.
Atlanta had 53.
On the surface, several of these numbers might suggest a statistical advantage for Los Angeles.
But Atlanta had the critical categories on its side:
- 219 rushing yards
- 6.6 yards per rush
- Zero turnovers
- Three interceptions
- One defensive touchdown
- A decisive late field goal
That combination explains why the Falcons won despite being outgained.
Player Performance Snapshot
Here is a concise view of the primary statistical contributors.
| Player | Team | Key Production |
| Matthew Stafford | Rams | 269 pass yards, 2 TD, 3 INT |
| Kyren Williams | Rams | 92 rush yards, 38 receiving yards |
| Xavier Smith | Rams | 67 receiving yards |
| Terrance Ferguson | Rams | 54 receiving yards, 1 TD |
| Puka Nacua | Rams | 5 receptions, 47 yards, 1 TD |
| Jared Verse | Rams | 6 tackles, blocked FG return TD |
| Kirk Cousins | Falcons | 126 pass yards, 1 TD, 0 INT |
| Bijan Robinson | Falcons | 195 rush yards, 34 receiving yards, 2 TD |
| David Sills V | Falcons | 37 receiving yards |
| Darnell Mooney | Falcons | 35 receiving yards |
| Xavier Watts | Falcons | 2 INT |
| Jessie Bates III | Falcons | INT, defensive TD |
| Zane Gonzalez | Falcons | 10 points, late 51-yard FG |
The statistical centerpiece is Robinson’s 229 scrimmage yards.
The defensive centerpiece is Atlanta’s three-interception performance.
The Rams’ biggest positive contributors were Williams’ rushing efficiency, the receiving production from multiple targets, and Verse’s defensive touchdown.
What Fantasy Football Readers Can Take From the Stats
Although a single game should not be used to make broad player projections, the box score provides useful context.
Robinson’s 195 rushing yards and two total touchdowns made him the dominant fantasy performer from the matchup.
Williams’ 92 rushing yards on 13 attempts also showed strong efficiency despite receiving fewer carries.
Nacua’s five receptions and touchdown gave him scoring value even though his yardage total was only 47.
Stafford’s 269 passing yards and two touchdowns provided volume, but the three interceptions significantly reduced his fantasy efficiency in formats that penalize turnovers.
For fantasy analysis, the distinction between yardage and scoring opportunities matters.
A player can produce strong yardage numbers without controlling the fantasy outcome, while a touchdown or turnover can dramatically alter the final result.
What the Game Says About Box-Score Analysis
A useful way to read an NFL box score is to move from broad statistics toward causation.
Start with the final score.
Then examine:
- Total yards
- Turnovers
- Rushing efficiency
- Explosive plays
- Third-down conversion
- Red-zone production
- Defensive scores
- Special teams scoring
Following that sequence makes this matchup much easier to understand.
If someone only looked at total yards, they might conclude that Los Angeles had the better offensive day.
If they only looked at passing yards, the difference would be even more pronounced.
But once turnovers and rushing production are included, the reason for Atlanta’s victory becomes much clearer.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Rams vs Falcons game?
The Atlanta Falcons defeated the Los Angeles Rams 27-24. Atlanta led 21-0 at halftime before Los Angeles mounted a major second-half comeback.
How many yards did Bijan Robinson have against the Rams?
Bijan Robinson rushed for 195 yards on 22 carries, averaging 8.9 yards per carry. He also caught five passes for 34 yards, giving him 229 total scrimmage yards.
How did Matthew Stafford perform against Atlanta?
Stafford completed 22 of 38 passes for 269 yards and two touchdowns. He also threw three interceptions and was sacked three times, finishing with a 64.5 passer rating.
How many interceptions did the Falcons record?
Atlanta recorded three interceptions. Xavier Watts had two, while Jessie Bates III had one. Bates returned his interception for a touchdown.
How many rushing yards did the Rams have?
Los Angeles finished with 115 rushing yards on 20 attempts, averaging 5.8 yards per carry. Kyren Williams led the Rams with 92 rushing yards.
Who kicked the game-winning field goal?
Zane Gonzalez kicked a 51-yard field goal with 21 seconds remaining to give Atlanta a 27-24 lead.
Conclusion
The los angeles rams vs atlanta falcons match player stats show why the final score cannot be understood through passing yards alone.
Los Angeles produced 363 total yards and had several strong individual performances. Stafford threw for 269 yards, Williams averaged 7.1 yards per carry, Ferguson averaged 27 yards per reception, and Nacua scored a fourth-quarter touchdown.
Atlanta, however, controlled the most consequential areas of the game.
Robinson rushed for 195 yards and added 34 receiving yards. The Falcons ran for 219 yards as a team, committed no turnovers, intercepted Stafford three times, and received a defensive touchdown from Jessie Bates III. Gonzalez then converted a 51-yard field goal with 21 seconds remaining to settle the contest.
The statistical contrast is what makes this game particularly useful to study. The Rams gained more total yards, ran more offensive plays, and generated considerably more passing production. Atlanta still won because its explosive rushing attack, turnover margin, defensive scoring, and late-game execution produced more points.
For readers studying player statistics, the central takeaway is that a complete NFL box-score analysis requires more than identifying the leading passer. Rushing efficiency, turnovers, defensive touchdowns, explosive plays, and scoring opportunities all help explain how the numbers translated into the final 27-24 result.
