Los Angeles Rams vs 49ers Match Player Stats
The los angeles rams vs 49ers match player stats from the September 11, 2026 NFL Week 1 matchup tell a clear story about how San Francisco turned a competitive opening quarter into a convincing 27-7 victory. The 49ers finished with three passing touchdowns from Brock Purdy, 174 rushing yards, and 205 passing yards, while the Rams managed 122 rushing yards and 168 receiving yards but could not turn those numbers into enough points. For Los Angeles, Kyren Williams scored the team’s only touchdown, while Puka Nacua led the receiving group with 74 yards.
The final score was San Francisco 49ers 27, Los Angeles Rams 7. San Francisco moved to 1-0, while Los Angeles opened the season at 0-1. The quarter-by-quarter scoring also shows how the game developed. San Francisco led 3-0 after the first quarter, extended the advantage to 10-7 at halftime, then added seven points in the third quarter and another 10 in the fourth.
This was not simply a game decided by one big statistical category. San Francisco produced a balanced offensive performance, protected its scoring opportunities, and received strong defensive contributions from players such as Fred Warner. Los Angeles produced some useful individual numbers, particularly from Puka Nacua and Blake Corum, but its offense struggled to consistently finish possessions.
Game Overview
The September 11, 2026 meeting was an NFL Week 1 contest between the San Francisco 49ers and Los Angeles Rams.
| Category | San Francisco 49ers | Los Angeles Rams |
| Final Score | 27 | 7 |
| Record After Game | 1-0 | 0-1 |
| Passing Yards | 205 | 168 |
| Rushing Yards | 174 | 122 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 3 | 0 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Total Receiving | 25 receptions, 205 yards | 17 receptions, 168 yards |
| Team Tackles | 69 | 78 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 1 |
| Sacks | 0 | 0 |
The most important difference is scoring efficiency. San Francisco scored four touchdowns in total, with Brock Purdy responsible for all three passing touchdowns and Los Angeles finding the end zone only once through Kyren Williams.
The yardage totals also show that this was not an extreme offensive mismatch. The 49ers had 379 combined rushing and passing yards based on the supplied team totals, while the Rams recorded 290. The 89-yard difference mattered, but the touchdown difference was even more significant.
San Francisco combined its passing game with a strong ground attack. The team rushed 30 times for 174 yards, averaging 5.8 yards per attempt. Los Angeles ran 29 times for 122 yards, averaging 4.2 yards per attempt.
That difference of 1.6 yards per rushing attempt gave San Francisco a major advantage in sustaining its offensive rhythm.
Los Angeles Rams vs 49ers Match Player Stats: Passing
Quarterback production was one of the clearest differences between the two teams.
Brock Purdy
Brock Purdy completed 25 of 34 passes for 205 yards. He averaged 6.0 yards per attempt and threw three touchdowns against one interception.
His listed QBR was 82.0, while his passer rating was 105.6.
Those numbers represent an efficient performance rather than a volume-based explosion. Purdy did not need to throw for 300 or 400 yards because San Francisco’s offense remained balanced on the ground.
His 25 completions accounted for all 205 of San Francisco’s passing yards. That means the 49ers receiving totals directly matched his passing output.
Purdy also contributed as a runner, carrying the ball five times for 29 yards. His 5.8-yard rushing average added another element to the offense, and his longest run went for 18 yards.
Matthew Stafford
Matthew Stafford completed 15 of 25 attempts for 155 yards. He averaged 6.2 yards per attempt and finished with no touchdowns and one interception.
His QBR was listed at 31.3, with a passer rating of 61.2.
The completion percentage was 60%, but the bigger issue was the lack of passing touchdowns. Los Angeles moved the ball through several players, but those gains did not produce enough points.
Stafford also recorded two rushing attempts for minus one yard.
Stetson Bennett IV
Stetson Bennett IV completed two of three passes for 13 yards. He did not throw a touchdown or interception.
He also contributed nine rushing yards on one attempt.
The combined passing output from Stafford and Bennett was 17 completions for 168 yards, matching the Rams’ team receiving total.
Rushing Performance
San Francisco’s ground game was one of the most important statistical advantages of the contest.
The 49ers finished with 30 rushing attempts for 174 yards. Their 5.8-yard average was substantially higher than Los Angeles’ 4.2-yard average.
Christian McCaffrey
Christian McCaffrey carried the ball 10 times for 68 yards.
His 6.8-yard average was the best among San Francisco’s primary rushing contributors with at least 10 attempts. He also recorded a long run of 16 yards.
McCaffrey was not used only as a runner. He caught five passes for 20 yards on eight targets, giving him 88 total yards from scrimmage based on the supplied rushing and receiving statistics.
That versatility matters because it forces a defense to account for him in multiple phases of the offense.
Kaelon Black
Kaelon Black carried 14 times for 65 yards.
He averaged 4.6 yards per carry and had a long run of 14 yards. Black’s workload was actually the highest rushing attempt total on the 49ers, with four more carries than McCaffrey.
He also caught one pass for five yards.
His contribution helped San Francisco maintain a strong rushing presence throughout the game rather than relying on one runner.
Brock Purdy
Purdy added 29 rushing yards on five attempts, averaging 5.8 yards per carry.
His 18-yard run was the longest rushing play among the San Francisco players listed in the supplied statistics.
Deebo Samuel Sr.
Deebo Samuel Sr. had one rushing attempt for 12 yards.
Although his rushing workload was limited, he made a significant contribution as a receiver and also returned kickoffs.
Rams Rushing Attack
Los Angeles had 29 rushing attempts for 122 yards.
Blake Corum led the Rams in rushing with 10 carries for 54 yards. He averaged 5.4 yards per carry and recorded a 13-yard long.
Kyren Williams carried 11 times for 41 yards and scored the Rams’ only rushing touchdown. His 3.7-yard average was lower than Corum’s, but his touchdown made his contribution particularly important to the final scoring total.
Ronnie Rivers added 19 yards on five attempts, while Bennett recorded nine yards on one attempt. Stafford finished with minus one yard on two carries.
The Rams therefore had several players contributing on the ground, but the overall 4.2-yard team average was not enough to match San Francisco’s efficiency.
Receiving Statistics
The receiving numbers provide another useful way to understand the game.
San Francisco completed 25 passes for 205 yards and three touchdowns. Los Angeles completed 17 passes for 168 yards without a passing touchdown.
San Francisco Receivers
Demarcus Robinson led the 49ers in receiving yardage despite making only two receptions. He finished with 50 yards, an average of 25.0 yards per reception, and one touchdown. His longest reception covered 39 yards.
Mike Evans caught six passes for 49 yards and one touchdown on seven targets. His 8.2-yard average was lower than Robinson’s, but his six receptions gave him a major role in the passing game.
Deebo Samuel Sr. also caught six passes. He finished with 48 receiving yards and one touchdown on seven targets.
Samuel therefore contributed in multiple phases. His six receptions, 48 receiving yards, 12 rushing yards, and 74 kick-return yards made him one of San Francisco’s most versatile contributors.
Christian McCaffrey caught five passes for 20 yards on eight targets.
Luke Farrell recorded two receptions for 19 yards, while George Kittle caught two passes for 12 yards on five targets.
Kaelon Black added one reception for five yards, and Jake Brendel caught one pass for two yards.
Los Angeles Receivers
Puka Nacua was clearly the Rams’ leading receiver.
Nacua caught five passes for 74 yards on nine targets. He averaged 14.8 yards per reception and produced a 41-yard long.
His performance stands out because he accounted for nearly half of Los Angeles’ receiving yardage. The Rams had 168 receiving yards in total, meaning Nacua’s 74 yards represented a substantial share of the team’s aerial production.
Davante Adams caught three passes for 26 yards on six targets. Kyren Williams added three receptions for 24 yards on six targets.
Davis Allen caught one pass for 13 yards, while Tyler Higbee had two receptions for 12 yards.
Jordan Whittington, Colby Parkinson, and Ronnie Rivers also recorded receptions.
Several Rams players were targeted without making a catch. Terrance Ferguson and Konata Mumpfield each finished with zero receptions on one target.
The receiving statistics therefore show that Los Angeles had some successful individual plays, but its passing attack lacked the touchdown production needed to keep pace.
Touchdown Production
Touchdowns were arguably the most important statistical separator.
San Francisco scored three passing touchdowns and no rushing touchdowns.
Los Angeles scored one rushing touchdown and no passing touchdowns.
That means the 49ers produced three more touchdowns through the passing game than the Rams, while Los Angeles’ only touchdown came from Kyren Williams.
Demarcus Robinson, Mike Evans, and Deebo Samuel Sr. each recorded one receiving touchdown for San Francisco.
For Los Angeles, Williams provided the only touchdown listed in the supplied offensive statistics.
The difference between yardage and scoring is important here. The Rams did gain 290 combined rushing and receiving yards according to the supplied team totals, but those yards produced only seven points. San Francisco’s 379 combined yards translated into 27 points.
This suggests that the 49ers were more effective at converting offensive production into scoring opportunities.
Defensive Player Stats
The defensive statistics provide another interesting contrast.
San Francisco recorded 69 total tackles, 33 solo tackles, two tackles for loss, four passes defended, and eight quarterback hits.
Los Angeles recorded 78 total tackles, 36 solo tackles, one tackle for loss, seven passes defended, and two quarterback hits.
Neither team recorded a sack in the supplied statistics.
Fred Warner
Fred Warner led San Francisco with 11 tackles, including five solo tackles.
His tackle total was the highest listed for either team.
Warner’s production is particularly notable in a game where the 49ers defense did not record a sack. Without sacks appearing in the supplied statistics, tackle volume and quarterback pressure indicators become useful measures of defensive activity.
San Francisco also received nine tackles from Marques Sigle.
Deommodore Lenoir and Dre Greenlaw each recorded six tackles.
Los Angeles Defensive Leaders
Quentin Lake led the Rams with 10 tackles, including seven solo tackles.
Kamren Kinchens followed with nine tackles, including three solo tackles.
Nate Landman recorded eight tackles, five of them solo.
The Rams had more total tackles than San Francisco, 78 to 69. That does not necessarily mean the Rams defense performed better overall. A defense can accumulate tackles because opponents are consistently completing plays and moving the ball.
The final score and offensive production indicate that San Francisco’s defense did enough to keep Los Angeles from turning its possessions into points.
Turnovers and Fumbles
Turnovers played an important role in the overall statistical picture.
San Francisco recorded one interception through Renardo Green.
Los Angeles also recorded one interception, with Quentin Lake making the pick.
Despite each team having one interception listed, San Francisco won comfortably.
That is another reason not to judge a game only by turnover count.
The fumble statistics were different.
San Francisco had one fumble recovery credited to Keion White, with no fumbles lost listed for him.
Los Angeles had two fumbles. Tyler Higbee lost one, while Jordan Whittington fumbled but did not lose the ball. The Rams were therefore charged with one lost fumble in the supplied data.
The Rams’ turnover profile included one interception thrown by Stafford and one lost fumble, while San Francisco also threw one interception but did not have a lost fumble listed.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams also contributed to the overall game profile.
San Francisco Kicking
Eddy Pineiro made two of three field-goal attempts.
He finished with a 66.7% field-goal percentage, made all three extra-point attempts, and recorded a long field goal of 56 yards.
His nine points were important to San Francisco’s 27-point total.
Los Angeles Kicking
Harrison Mevis did not attempt a field goal according to the supplied statistics.
He made his only extra-point attempt for one point.
Kick Returns
Deebo Samuel Sr. returned two kickoffs for 74 yards, averaging 37.0 yards per return. His longest return went 45 yards.
For Los Angeles, Jordan Whittington had four kickoff returns for 94 yards, averaging 23.5 yards with a long of 31.
Xavier Smith returned one kickoff for 25 yards.
Punt Returns
Jacob Cowing handled San Francisco’s punt returns, recording two returns for 17 yards and an 8.5-yard average.
Xavier Smith had one punt return for Los Angeles, gaining 11 yards.
The special teams numbers did not completely explain the final result, but San Francisco benefited from Pineiro’s scoring production and Samuel’s strong kickoff-return average.
Punting Comparison
San Francisco punter Corliss Waitman recorded two punts for 94 yards.
His average was 47.0 yards, with a longest punt of 51 yards and one touchback.
Los Angeles punter Ethan Evans recorded three punts for 145 yards.
He averaged 48.3 yards per punt, with a long of 54 yards. Two of his punts landed inside the 20-yard line.
The Rams therefore had the higher punting average and more punts, but that advantage did not translate into the final score.
Player Comparison Table
The following table brings the most important offensive numbers together.
| Player | Team | Key Production |
| Brock Purdy | 49ers | 25/34, 205 pass yards, 3 TD, 1 INT |
| Matthew Stafford | Rams | 15/25, 155 pass yards, 0 TD, 1 INT |
| Christian McCaffrey | 49ers | 68 rush yards, 20 receiving yards |
| Kaelon Black | 49ers | 65 rush yards, 5 receiving yards |
| Blake Corum | Rams | 54 rush yards |
| Kyren Williams | Rams | 41 rush yards, 1 rush TD, 24 receiving yards |
| Puka Nacua | Rams | 5 receptions, 74 yards |
| Demarcus Robinson | 49ers | 2 receptions, 50 yards, 1 TD |
| Mike Evans | 49ers | 6 receptions, 49 yards, 1 TD |
| Deebo Samuel Sr. | 49ers | 6 receptions, 48 yards, 1 TD |
| Fred Warner | 49ers | 11 tackles |
| Quentin Lake | Rams | 10 tackles, 1 INT |
What the Numbers Say About San Francisco
The most impressive aspect of San Francisco’s performance was balance.
The 49ers did not need Purdy to produce an enormous passing-yard total. His 205 yards were enough because the rushing attack produced another 174 yards.
That combination created 379 yards of listed offensive production.
The 49ers also distributed the football effectively. Six different players recorded at least two receptions, while Robinson, Evans, and Samuel each produced a touchdown.
McCaffrey’s role was particularly valuable because he contributed in both the running and passing games.
San Francisco’s defense also produced pressure without recording a sack. The team registered eight quarterback hits, four passes defended, and an interception.
Fred Warner’s 11 tackles led the defensive effort.
The overall picture is of a team that won through complementary football rather than relying on one extraordinary statistical category.
What the Numbers Say About Los Angeles
The Rams had several individual performances worth highlighting despite the loss.
Puka Nacua was the clear receiving standout with 74 yards and a 41-yard reception.
Blake Corum averaged 5.4 yards per carry on 10 attempts, making him the Rams’ most efficient primary runner among players with double-digit carries.
Kyren Williams supplied the team’s only touchdown and contributed in both rushing and receiving.
The defensive side also had active individual performances. Quentin Lake recorded 10 tackles and an interception, while Kamren Kinchens and Nate Landman also reached significant tackle totals.
However, the overall offensive numbers reveal the central problem.
The Rams produced 168 receiving yards but no passing touchdowns. They rushed for 122 yards and scored once on the ground. The result was only seven points.
For an offense with multiple productive individual players, the challenge was converting those individual gains into sustained scoring drives.
Why Puka Nacua’s Performance Matters
Nacua’s 74 receiving yards were one of the strongest individual offensive numbers for Los Angeles.
He caught five passes on nine targets, meaning he was involved regularly in the passing game.
His 41-yard reception also shows that Los Angeles was capable of generating explosive plays.
However, one receiver cannot completely determine an offensive result.
The Rams’ entire passing unit finished with 168 yards and no touchdowns. That means Nacua’s productivity was not supported by enough scoring production elsewhere.
From an analytical perspective, his performance should therefore be viewed as a positive individual result within a struggling team offensive performance.
Why Brock Purdy Was the Statistical Difference-Maker
Purdy’s three touchdown passes were the clearest individual difference between the teams.
His 25 completions also gave San Francisco a reliable passing foundation.
A 105.6 passer rating combined with three touchdowns indicates that his passing efficiency was substantially better than Stafford’s 61.2 rating.
Purdy also avoided turning the game into a one-dimensional passing contest. The 49ers rushed for 174 yards, allowing him to operate within a balanced offensive structure.
His five rushing attempts for 29 yards added another 29 yards to his total offensive contribution.
The result was a quarterback performance that combined efficiency, touchdown production, and mobility.
Comparing the Offensive Balance
A useful way to evaluate this game is to compare rushing and passing production.
San Francisco:
- 205 passing yards
- 174 rushing yards
- 379 combined yards
- Three passing touchdowns
- Zero rushing touchdowns
Los Angeles:
- 168 receiving yards
- 122 rushing yards
- 290 combined yards
- Zero passing touchdowns
- One rushing touchdown
The 49ers gained 89 more combined yards.
More importantly, their production was more evenly distributed across the scoring structure.
San Francisco scored 27 points from four touchdowns and three made extra points plus two field goals. Los Angeles scored seven points from one touchdown and one extra point.
This is why looking beyond the final score is useful. The individual numbers show exactly where the game separated.
Quarter-by-Quarter Development
The scoring pattern also tells an important story.
First Quarter
San Francisco scored three points while Los Angeles remained scoreless.
The 49ers therefore established an early advantage without yet creating a large gap.
Second Quarter
Both teams scored seven points in the second quarter.
The halftime score was 10-7, leaving the Rams within one possession.
This was the most competitive stage of the game.
Third Quarter
San Francisco scored another seven points, while Los Angeles failed to score.
The 17-7 score created a 10-point advantage heading into the fourth quarter.
Fourth Quarter
The 49ers added another 10 points.
Los Angeles remained scoreless.
The final 27-7 score therefore developed from a relatively close first half into a much more decisive second half.
This progression is important because it shows that San Francisco’s victory was not simply created during the opening minutes. The 49ers continued to add points while the Rams’ offense failed to respond.
The Most Important Statistical Takeaways
Several numbers stand above the rest when reviewing this matchup.
1. San Francisco’s 174 rushing yards
The 49ers averaged 5.8 yards per rushing attempt.
That allowed them to complement Purdy’s passing game and maintain offensive balance.
2. Brock Purdy’s three passing touchdowns
Purdy accounted for all three San Francisco passing touchdowns.
His 105.6 passer rating was substantially higher than Stafford’s 61.2.
3. Puka Nacua’s 74 receiving yards
Nacua was the Rams’ leading receiver and produced the team’s longest reception at 41 yards.
4. Fred Warner’s 11 tackles
Warner led all listed defenders in tackles.
His performance helped anchor a San Francisco defense that recorded eight quarterback hits and one interception.
5. The Rams’ seven points
Despite producing 122 rushing yards and 168 receiving yards, Los Angeles scored only one touchdown.
That scoring efficiency gap was central to the outcome.
How to Read These Player Stats Correctly
Individual statistics should always be considered within the context of team performance.
A player can have an excellent statistical game while his team loses.
Puka Nacua is a strong example. His 74 receiving yards and 41-yard long were impressive, but the Rams did not score a passing touchdown.
Similarly, Quentin Lake recorded 10 tackles and an interception, but the Rams still allowed 27 points.
On the San Francisco side, Purdy’s 205 passing yards may look modest compared with high-volume NFL quarterback performances. However, his three touchdowns, 105.6 rating, and the team’s 174 rushing yards show why his production was enough.
Stats become more useful when they are connected rather than examined in isolation.
Final Statistical Assessment
The los angeles rams vs 49ers match player stats show a game in which San Francisco combined efficiency, balance, and touchdown production more effectively than Los Angeles.
The 49ers finished with 174 rushing yards and 205 passing yards. Their passing attack produced three touchdowns, while their defense added an interception and eight quarterback hits.
Brock Purdy led the offensive performance with 205 passing yards and three touchdowns. Christian McCaffrey contributed 68 rushing yards, Kaelon Black added 65, and three different receivers recorded touchdowns.
Los Angeles had legitimate individual positives. Puka Nacua led the team with 74 receiving yards, Blake Corum rushed for 54 yards, and Kyren Williams scored the team’s only touchdown. Quentin Lake led the defense with 10 tackles and recorded an interception.
Yet the broader numbers explain the 27-7 result.
San Francisco gained 379 combined rushing and passing yards compared with 290 for Los Angeles. The 49ers also averaged 5.8 yards per rushing attempt compared with 4.2 for the Rams.
The biggest separator was not simply yardage. It was the ability to turn production into points.
San Francisco scored 27 points, including three passing touchdowns. Los Angeles scored seven, with its only touchdown coming on the ground.
For readers examining the los angeles rams vs 49ers match player stats, the most useful conclusion is that San Francisco’s victory was built on complementary offensive production and stronger scoring efficiency. The Rams had several productive individual players, but their overall offensive output did not translate into enough touchdowns to remain competitive after halftime.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Rams vs 49ers game on September 11, 2026?
The San Francisco 49ers defeated the Los Angeles Rams 27-7 in NFL Week 1 on September 11, 2026.
How many passing touchdowns did Brock Purdy throw?
Brock Purdy threw three touchdown passes. He completed 25 of 34 attempts for 205 yards and one interception.
Who led the Rams in receiving?
Puka Nacua led Los Angeles with five receptions for 74 yards on nine targets. His longest reception was 41 yards.
Who led the 49ers in rushing?
Christian McCaffrey led the 49ers in rushing yards with 68 on 10 carries. He averaged 6.8 yards per carry.
Who led the game in tackles?
Fred Warner led San Francisco and all listed defenders with 11 tackles. Quentin Lake led the Rams with 10 tackles.
How many points did the Rams score?
The Los Angeles Rams scored seven points. Kyren Williams scored the team’s only touchdown, and Harrison Mevis made the extra point.
Conclusion
The los angeles rams vs 49ers match player stats provide a detailed picture of why San Francisco opened the 2026 season with a 27-7 victory.
Brock Purdy delivered three touchdown passes, while the 49ers rushing attack produced 174 yards. Christian McCaffrey and Kaelon Black supplied the majority of the ground production, and Demarcus Robinson, Mike Evans, and Deebo Samuel Sr. each caught a touchdown.
The Rams had useful individual performances from Puka Nacua, Blake Corum, Kyren Williams, and Quentin Lake. Nacua’s 74 receiving yards and Lake’s 10 tackles with an interception were among the strongest individual numbers for Los Angeles.
The decisive difference was overall efficiency. San Francisco combined 205 passing yards with 174 rushing yards and converted its offensive production into 27 points. Los Angeles produced 168 receiving yards and 122 rushing yards but reached the end zone only once.
The quarter-by-quarter score reinforces the same conclusion. After a 10-7 halftime score, San Francisco controlled the second half by adding 17 unanswered points.
Taken together, the statistics show that the 49ers won through balance, quarterback efficiency, touchdown production, and sustained second-half execution, while the Rams struggled to convert their individual offensive gains into points.
2 Comments