Sacramento Kings vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats

The sacramento kings vs phoenix suns match player stats from March 14, 2025, tell a much more detailed story than the final 122-106 score. Phoenix controlled the game with elite three-point shooting, strong ball movement, and a huge first-quarter advantage, while Sacramento stayed competitive through efficient two-point scoring and a strong performance from DeMar DeRozan. Phoenix finished 41-for-79 from the field, including 24-for-43 from three, while Sacramento shot 40-for-81 overall and just 8-for-32 from deep.

The game was played in Phoenix on March 14, 2025, with an attendance of 17,071. Phoenix improved to 31-36, while Sacramento dropped to 33-33.

For anyone researching the sacramento kings vs phoenix suns match player stats, the most important numbers are not limited to points. The difference in three-point efficiency, turnovers, assists, defensive activity, and individual shot selection explains why Phoenix created separation even though Sacramento had several productive offensive performances.

Table of Contents

Sacramento Kings vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats: Game Overview

Phoenix won 122-106 after establishing control early. The Suns scored 36 points in the opening quarter while limiting Sacramento to 22. The Kings responded with a 35-point second quarter, cutting into the deficit, but Phoenix restored its advantage by scoring 35 points in the third.

Final Score by Quarter

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Final
Sacramento Kings	22	35	25	24	106
Phoenix Suns	36	26	35	25	122

Phoenix’s 16-point victory was built around several connected advantages rather than one isolated statistic.

The Suns:

Shot 51.9% from the field
Shot 55.8% from three-point range
Made 24 three-pointers
Recorded 33 assists
Committed only 11 turnovers
Collected 12 steals
Scored 38 points off Sacramento turnovers

Sacramento:

Shot 49.4% from the field
Shot only 25.0% from three
Made 8 three-pointers
Recorded 25 assists
Committed 19 turnovers
Collected 7 steals
Scored 18 points off Phoenix turnovers

The combination of Phoenix’s perimeter efficiency and Sacramento’s turnovers created a substantial possession and scoring advantage.

DeMar DeRozan Leads Sacramento’s Scoring

DeMar DeRozan was Sacramento’s leading scorer with 23 points. He shot 9-for-13 from the field, made 3-of-5 three-pointers, and went 2-for-3 at the free-throw line.

What makes DeRozan’s performance particularly interesting is that Sacramento did not get enough complementary perimeter efficiency around him.

He produced 23 points from only 13 field-goal attempts, meaning he was highly efficient with his opportunities. However, the Kings as a team made only eight three-pointers. That limited the overall offensive pressure they could put on Phoenix’s defense.

DeRozan also finished with only one assist and no rebounds. His role was primarily focused on scoring, and he did that effectively.

Zach LaVine Adds 21 Points

Zach LaVine finished with 21 points on 7-for-13 shooting. He also made 5-of-6 free throws and collected three rebounds and two assists.

LaVine’s shooting efficiency was solid overall, but his three-point shooting was only 2-for-6. That was still better than some of Sacramento’s other perimeter attempts, but Phoenix’s 24 made threes made the comparison particularly difficult.

The Kings needed efficient scoring from both LaVine and DeRozan, and they received it. The bigger problem was that the team could not match Phoenix’s volume and efficiency from beyond the arc.

Domantas Sabonis Records a Triple-Double

One of the most important individual stories in the sacramento kings vs phoenix suns match player stats was Domantas Sabonis.

Sabonis finished with:

12 points
11 rebounds
12 assists
4-for-11 shooting
0-for-2 from three
4-for-4 free throws

That gave him a triple-double in his return after missing six games with a hamstring injury.

His 12 assists were especially important because Sacramento’s offense relied heavily on his passing from the interior and half-court playmaking.

Sabonis also led Sacramento with 11 rebounds and helped the Kings win the overall rebounding battle 40-34.

Yet his triple-double did not translate into a team victory. That is an important lesson when analyzing player statistics. Individual production can be excellent while the team-level shot profile and turnover margin still create a decisive disadvantage.

Malik Monk Provides Secondary Scoring

Malik Monk scored 18 points while grabbing eight rebounds and recording five assists.

He shot 8-for-18 from the field but went 0-for-8 from three. That combination is important when evaluating his performance.

His overall field-goal volume helped Sacramento, but missing all eight attempts from beyond the arc meant the Kings lost another potential source of spacing.

Monk’s five assists and eight rebounds added value beyond scoring. Still, the missed three-point attempts contributed to Sacramento’s 25% team accuracy from long range.

Keegan Murray Contributes 14 Points

Keegan Murray scored 14 points on 6-for-13 shooting and made 2-of-8 three-point attempts. He also grabbed eight rebounds and two assists.

Murray’s eight rebounds were useful because Sacramento was not being dominated on the glass. In fact, the Kings finished with six more total rebounds than Phoenix.

His 2-for-8 three-point shooting, however, was another example of the difference between Sacramento’s perimeter production and Phoenix’s.

Complete Sacramento Player Statistical Breakdown

Player	PTS	REB	AST	FG	3PT
DeMar DeRozan	23	0	1	9-13	3-5
Zach LaVine	21	3	2	7-13	2-6
Malik Monk	18	8	5	8-18	0-8
Keegan Murray	14	8	2	6-13	2-8
Domantas Sabonis	12	11	12	4-11	0-2
Doug McDermott	7	1	1	2-2	0-0
Jonas Valanciunas	6	5	2	2-5	0-0
Jake LaRavia	3	2	0	1-4	1-3
Isaac Jones	2	1	0	1-1	0-0
Devin Carter	0	1	0	0-0	0-0
Markelle Fultz	0	0	0	0-1	0-0
Isaiah Crawford	0	0	0	0-0	0-0

Devin Booker Controls the Game for Phoenix

Devin Booker finished with 22 points, four rebounds, and 13 assists. He shot 8-for-17 from the field, made 4-of-10 three-pointers, and was perfect from the free-throw line.

The 13 assists were arguably as important as his 22 points.

Booker’s passing allowed Phoenix to turn Sacramento’s defensive attention toward him into open opportunities for teammates. The Suns ultimately produced 33 assists on 41 made field goals, an extremely strong ratio of assisted baskets.

Booker’s performance illustrates why raw scoring numbers alone do not completely describe offensive influence. His scoring was efficient enough to demand defensive attention, while his passing helped generate the additional perimeter opportunities that powered Phoenix’s offense.

Kevin Durant Adds 22 Efficient Points

Kevin Durant matched Booker’s 22 points and added four rebounds and six assists.

He shot 7-for-15 from the field and 4-for-6 from three. He also made all four of his free throws.

Durant’s four made threes were particularly valuable because Sacramento could not consistently answer Phoenix from long range.

His 46.7% field-goal percentage was not spectacular by his usual standards, but his three-point shooting and free-throw accuracy kept his scoring efficient.

Durant also contributed six assists, giving Phoenix another high-level passer alongside Booker.

Tyus Jones Has a Remarkable Shooting Night

Tyus Jones scored 20 points in one of the most efficient performances of the game.

He went 6-for-7 from the field and an extraordinary 6-for-6 from three-point range. He also made both free throws.

That means Jones scored 18 of his 20 points from three-point range.

His performance was important because Phoenix did not depend only on Booker and Durant for perimeter scoring. Jones became another major shooting threat, forcing Sacramento’s defense to account for an additional player outside the paint.

This is one of the clearest reasons the final three-point totals were so different.

Phoenix made 24 threes.

Sacramento made eight.

That is a 16-made-three difference, which alone represents 48 points of scoring differential from made three-pointers.

Ryan Dunn Provides Two-Way Production

Ryan Dunn finished with 16 points, five rebounds, three assists, and four steals. He shot 6-for-16 from the field and 2-for-9 from three.

Although his shooting efficiency was not as strong as Jones’s or Durant’s, his defensive activity mattered.

Four steals helped Phoenix reach 12 steals as a team. Those takeaways contributed to the Suns’ 38 points off Sacramento turnovers.

Dunn’s statistical profile shows why box-score analysis should include defensive categories. A player does not need to score 20 points to have a major effect on a game.

Bradley Beal and Oso Ighodaro Add Important Contributions

Bradley Beal scored 15 points on 5-for-9 shooting and made 4-of-7 three-point attempts. He also added three rebounds and two assists.

Oso Ighodaro contributed 11 points, six rebounds, and one assist while shooting 4-for-5 from the field. His +23 was the best plus-minus mark among Phoenix players in the official scorer’s report.

Royce O’Neale also made an impact with nine points on 3-for-4 shooting, including 3-for-4 from three.

Together, these performances demonstrate how Phoenix distributed offensive responsibility.

Complete Phoenix Player Statistical Breakdown

Player	PTS	REB	AST	FG	3PT
Devin Booker	22	4	13	8-17	4-10
Kevin Durant	22	4	6	7-15	4-6
Tyus Jones	20	2	4	6-7	6-6
Ryan Dunn	16	5	3	6-16	2-9
Bradley Beal	15	3	2	5-9	4-7
Oso Ighodaro	11	6	1	4-5	0-0
Royce O’Neale	9	3	1	3-4	3-4
Collin Gillespie	5	1	2	1-3	1-1
Mason Plumlee	2	5	1	1-3	0-0
Bol Bol	0	1	0	0-0	0-0
TyTy Washington Jr.	0	0	0	0-0	0-0

Three-Point Shooting Was the Biggest Statistical Difference

The most obvious difference in the sacramento kings vs phoenix suns match player stats is the three-point shooting.

Sacramento:

8-for-32, 25.0%

Phoenix:

24-for-43, 55.8%

Phoenix attempted 11 more threes and made 16 more.

That produced an enormous scoring advantage.

Sacramento’s offense was actually reasonably efficient inside the arc. The Kings shot 40-for-81 overall, or 49.4%. They also made 18-of-20 free throws.

Phoenix, however, combined efficient two-point shooting with extraordinary perimeter accuracy.

This created a difficult mathematical problem for Sacramento. Even if the Kings scored efficiently inside, Phoenix’s three-point production created far more points per successful possession.

Turnovers Created a Second Major Gap

Phoenix forced Sacramento into 19 turnovers.

The Suns had only 11 turnovers themselves.

That eight-turnover difference was significant because Phoenix converted Sacramento’s mistakes into 38 points.

Sacramento generated only 16 points from Phoenix turnovers.

This is one of the strongest indicators that the game was not simply about shooting.

A team can survive a poor shooting night if it protects the ball, dominates second-chance opportunities, or controls the offensive glass.

Sacramento did not have enough of those advantages to offset Phoenix’s shooting.

Assists Reveal Phoenix’s Offensive Structure

Sacramento recorded 25 assists.

Phoenix recorded 33.

The eight-assist advantage fits directly with the Suns’ superior shooting night.

Booker led the game with 13 assists, while Durant added six and Jones four. Phoenix therefore received playmaking from multiple positions rather than depending on one creator.

Sacramento’s 25 assists were still respectable, especially with Sabonis recording 12. But Phoenix’s passing generated more clean perimeter opportunities.

The final statistics therefore connect logically:

Phoenix generated more assists.
Phoenix created more three-point attempts.
Phoenix made more three-pointers.
Sacramento committed more turnovers.
Phoenix converted those turnovers into 38 points.
Phoenix won by 16 points.

That sequence explains the result more effectively than simply saying the Suns shot better.

Rebounding Did Not Decide the Game

Sacramento actually finished with more rebounds.

The Kings had 40 total rebounds compared with Phoenix’s 34.

Sabonis led Sacramento with 11 rebounds, while Murray and Monk each had eight.

Phoenix’s leading rebounders were Ighodaro with six and several players with five or four.

This is useful context because it demonstrates that the Kings did not lose because they were dominated on the boards.

They had an advantage in total rebounds but still lost by 16.

That means the rebounding edge was not large enough to overcome the Suns’ shooting and turnover advantages.

Points in the Paint Tell a Different Story

Sacramento scored 44 points in the paint.

Phoenix scored 28.

That was a clear advantage for the Kings.

This makes the final score even more informative.

Sacramento performed better around the basket and won the overall rebounding battle, yet Phoenix still produced a 16-point victory.

The reason was the massive difference in three-point scoring and turnovers.

This is a good example of why individual and team statistics should be examined together. Looking only at points in the paint might suggest Sacramento had an offensive advantage. Looking at the entire statistical profile gives a different picture.

The First Quarter Set the Tone

Phoenix opened the game with 36 points.

Sacramento scored only 22.

That 14-point first-quarter difference forced the Kings to spend much of the game trying to recover.

Sacramento did respond with 35 points in the second quarter and won that period 35-26. The comeback effort was real, but Phoenix entered halftime with a 62-57 lead.

The third quarter then became decisive.

Phoenix scored 35 points while Sacramento scored 25.

That restored a double-digit advantage and gave the Suns control heading into the fourth.

Why Sabonis’ Triple-Double Was Not Enough

Sabonis’ triple-double is one of the most interesting elements of the game.

He had:

12 points + 11 rebounds + 12 assists

That is an impressive all-around line.

But basketball is ultimately a team sport, and the surrounding numbers matter.

Sabonis shot 4-for-11 and did not make a three-pointer. Sacramento also had several high-volume perimeter players struggle from deep.

The Kings’ three primary contributors outside Sabonis combined for poor three-point efficiency:

DeRozan: 3-for-5
LaVine: 2-for-6
Monk: 0-for-8

Those players combined to shoot 5-for-19 from three.

Phoenix’s three biggest perimeter contributors, meanwhile, were much more effective:

Booker: 4-for-10
Durant: 4-for-6
Jones: 6-for-6

Those three combined for 14-for-22 from three.

That contrast is one of the clearest explanations for the final outcome.

What the Game Says About Offensive Efficiency

The sacramento kings vs phoenix suns match player stats also show the importance of shot value.

Sacramento made 40 field goals.

Phoenix made 41.

At first glance, that difference appears insignificant.

But Phoenix’s 41 made baskets included 24 three-pointers.

Sacramento’s 40 made baskets included only eight threes.

So the teams had nearly identical numbers of made field goals, but the value of those field goals was dramatically different.

Phoenix therefore reached 122 points despite making only one more field goal than Sacramento.

That is a textbook example of how three-point volume can transform an otherwise close field-goal total into a substantial scoring advantage.

Defensive Activity Favored Phoenix

Phoenix finished with 12 steals and three blocks.

Sacramento had seven steals and one block.

The Suns’ defensive activity helped create transition opportunities and forced Sacramento to play more possessions from disadvantageous situations.

Ryan Dunn led Phoenix with four steals.

The Suns also had multiple players contributing defensively, including Durant, Beal, Ighodaro, and O’Neale.

The result was not simply a shooting exhibition. Phoenix’s defensive pressure helped generate additional offensive opportunities.

Mason Plumlee’s Ejection

Mason Plumlee played 15:42 and recorded two points, five rebounds, and one assist before being ejected in the third quarter following a Flagrant 2 foul against Sabonis.

The ejection occurred with 5:47 remaining in the third quarter.

Despite losing Plumlee, Phoenix maintained control.

Oso Ighodaro played 32:18 and supplied 11 points and six rebounds, helping Phoenix maintain frontcourt production.

This was another example of Phoenix receiving meaningful contributions beyond its two headline scorers.

What the Player Stats Reveal About Both Teams

A useful way to understand this game is to separate individual success from team-level efficiency.

Sacramento’s Positive Indicators

Sacramento showed several strengths:

49.4% overall shooting
90% free-throw shooting
40 rebounds
44 points in the paint
Sabonis triple-double
DeRozan’s 23 points on efficient shooting
LaVine’s 21 points on 7-for-13 shooting

These numbers show that Sacramento’s offense was not completely ineffective.

Sacramento’s Problem Areas

The biggest weaknesses were:

25% three-point shooting
19 turnovers
Only eight made threes
Seven fewer assists than Phoenix
38 Phoenix points generated from turnovers

The combination of turnovers and perimeter shooting created a difficult path to victory.

Phoenix’s Positive Indicators

Phoenix’s statistical strengths included:

51.9% field-goal shooting
55.8% three-point shooting
24 made threes
33 assists
12 steals
Only 11 turnovers
38 points off turnovers

These advantages worked together rather than appearing independently.

Player Efficiency Beyond the Box Score

When evaluating the individual performances, field-goal attempts provide useful context.

DeRozan scored 23 points on 13 shots.

LaVine scored 21 on 13 shots.

Booker scored 22 on 17 shots.

Durant scored 22 on 15 shots.

Jones scored 20 on only seven shots.

That last number stands out.

Jones scored 20 points on seven field-goal attempts because he made all six of his three-point attempts and both free throws. His 20 points came with remarkably little shooting volume.

This is precisely why shooting splits can be more informative than points alone.

A 20-point performance on seven field-goal attempts tells a very different story from 20 points on 20 attempts.

Comparing the Main Scorers

Player	Points	FG	3PT	FT	Key Contribution
DeMar DeRozan	23	9-13	3-5	2-3	Efficient scoring
Zach LaVine	21	7-13	2-6	5-6	Secondary scoring
Domantas Sabonis	12	4-11	0-2	4-4	Triple-double
Devin Booker	22	8-17	4-10	2-2	13 assists
Kevin Durant	22	7-15	4-6	4-4	Scoring and playmaking
Tyus Jones	20	6-7	6-6	2-2	Elite shooting efficiency

The comparison demonstrates how different offensive roles can produce similar scoring totals.

The Season-Series Context

The supplied matchup history requires an important correction.

The March meeting was followed by another regular-season matchup in April. The final meeting was April 13, when Sacramento defeated Phoenix 109-98.

Therefore, when discussing the full 2024-25 season series, it is important to distinguish the March meeting from the April result.

The March contest itself was Phoenix’s 122-106 home victory.

How to Read These Stats Correctly

If you are using this game as a reference for player-stat analysis, there are several useful lessons.

Do Not Judge a Game Only by the Leading Scorer

DeRozan led Sacramento with 23 points, but Sabonis’ 12 assists were arguably just as important to Sacramento’s offensive structure.

Booker also scored 22 points, but his 13 assists substantially increased his overall offensive influence.

Look at Shooting Volume

Phoenix attempted 43 three-pointers.

Sacramento attempted 32.

The Suns therefore combined higher volume with much higher accuracy.

Track Turnovers

Nineteen turnovers from Sacramento were costly because Phoenix converted them into 38 points.

This was not a minor statistical difference.

Separate Individual Efficiency From Team Success

DeRozan was efficient.

LaVine was efficient.

Sabonis recorded a triple-double.

Yet Sacramento lost by 16.

That does not make those individual performances meaningless. It demonstrates that team-level advantages can outweigh strong individual production.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who scored the most points for the Sacramento Kings?

DeMar DeRozan led Sacramento with 23 points. He shot 9-for-13 from the field and made three of his five three-point attempts.

Who led the Phoenix Suns in scoring?

Devin Booker and Kevin Durant each scored 22 points. Booker also recorded 13 assists, while Durant added six assists.

Did Domantas Sabonis record a triple-double?

Yes. Sabonis finished with 12 points, 11 rebounds, and 12 assists.

How many three-pointers did the Suns make?

Phoenix made 24 of 43 three-point attempts, shooting 55.8% from beyond the arc.

How many turnovers did Sacramento have?

Sacramento committed 19 turnovers. Phoenix committed 11.

What was the final score?

Phoenix defeated Sacramento 122-106. The Suns led 36-22 after the first quarter and maintained the advantage through the final period.

Conclusion

The sacramento kings vs phoenix suns match player stats from this matchup provide a strong example of how a game can be decided by efficiency, shot selection, and possession value rather than simply by the number of points scored by individual stars.

Sacramento received excellent scoring from DeMar DeRozan, strong all-around production from Domantas Sabonis, and useful contributions from Zach LaVine, Malik Monk, and Keegan Murray. Sabonis’ triple-double was particularly notable in his return to action.

Phoenix, however, produced the more effective overall statistical profile. Devin Booker combined 22 points with 13 assists, Kevin Durant added 22 points and six assists, and Tyus Jones delivered an extraordinary 20-point performance while making all six of his three-point attempts.

The decisive numbers were Phoenix’s 24 made three-pointers, 33 assists, 12 steals, and 11 turnovers compared with Sacramento’s eight threes, 25 assists, seven steals, and 19 turnovers. Phoenix also converted Sacramento’s mistakes into 38 points.