Baltimore Orioles vs New York Yankees Match Player Stats
The baltimore orioles vs new york yankees match player stats tell the story of a close game that turned on timely hitting, late inning execution, and a few critical pitching moments. According to the game data supplied for this analysis, the Yankees defeated the Orioles 5-3 at Oriole Park at Camden Yards, with New York collecting 10 hits and Baltimore recording 6. The Yankees also finished with one home run, while the Orioles hit two, showing that the final result was not simply a matter of long ball production. It was the Yankees’ ability to create opportunities, convert them late, and limit Baltimore with runners in scoring position that ultimately shaped the game.
The supplied box score lists the game date as August 20, 2026 and identifies Game ID 401816589. However, there is an important date discrepancy worth noting for readers who are checking the official record. MLB’s official game coverage identifies the 5-3 Yankees victory as the August 19, 2026 matchup, while its August 20 coverage records a 6-1 Yankees victory. (MLB.com) The statistical breakdown below follows the detailed 5-3 game data provided for this article, while this date distinction should be corrected before publication if the article is intended to match MLB’s official date record.
Baltimore Orioles vs New York Yankees Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The supplied statistics show a game that was competitive for most of the night before New York separated itself in the eighth inning.
The final statistical picture was:
| Category | New York Yankees | Baltimore Orioles |
| Runs | 5 | 3 |
| Hits | 10 | 6 |
| Errors | 0 | 0 |
| At Bats | 33 | 33 |
| RBI | 4 | 2 |
| Home Runs | 1 | 2 |
| Walks | 3 | 3 |
| Strikeouts | 10 | 11 |
| Runners Left on Base | 7 | 7 |
| RISP | 2-for-11 | 0-for-6 |
| Stolen Bases | 1 | 2 |
| Double Plays | 0 | 2 |
At first glance, Baltimore’s two home runs might suggest that the Orioles generated more dangerous offensive moments. The broader numbers tell a different story.
New York produced four more hits, scored two more runs, and converted two of its 11 opportunities with runners in scoring position. Baltimore went 0-for-6 in those situations. That difference is particularly important because both clubs left seven runners on base.
In other words, the Yankees did not win simply because they had more baserunners. Both teams had opportunities. New York was more successful at turning those opportunities into runs.
The official MLB record for the corresponding 5-3 game also confirms the 10-6 hit advantage, the 5-3 final score, and the pitching decisions involving Brent Headrick, Cam Sanders, and David Bednar. (MLB.com)
How the Yankees Built Their 5-3 Victory
The Yankees’ offensive production was spread across several innings rather than coming from one huge scoring burst.
The scoring sequence supplied for the game was:
- First inning: Jackson Holliday stole home, while Gunnar Henderson stole second, giving Baltimore an early 1-0 lead.
- Second inning: Ryan McMahon delivered an RBI single to score Jazz Chisholm Jr., tying the game.
- Second inning: George Lombard Jr. followed with a sacrifice fly that brought in Jones and put New York ahead 2-1.
- Third inning: Ben Rice hit a 447-foot home run to extend the Yankees’ advantage to 3-1.
- Third inning: Pete Alonso responded with a 423-foot home run, making it 3-2.
- Sixth inning: Dylan Beavers hit a 389-foot home run to tie the game at 3-3.
- Eighth inning: Lombard Jr. delivered an RBI infield single to put New York back ahead 4-3.
- Eighth inning: Chisholm Jr. scored on a wild pitch, giving the Yankees their final 5-3 margin.
This sequence demonstrates why run production should not be judged by home runs alone.
Baltimore hit two home runs and still lost. New York hit only one and won.
The Yankees created their winning margin through a combination of singles, sacrifice hitting, baserunning, and pressure in the late innings. That is an important lesson when reading a single-game box score. A team’s most influential offensive contribution may not always appear as the biggest number in the home run column.
Ben Rice Delivered a Major Offensive Moment
Ben Rice was one of the clearest individual contributors for New York.
The supplied player statistics credit Rice with:
- 2 hits
- 1 run
- 1 RBI
- 1 home run
His third-inning home run traveled an estimated 447 feet in the supplied data, making it one of the most visually significant offensive plays of the game.
A long home run can change the shape of a game because it immediately adds a run without requiring additional baserunners. Rice’s blast gave the Yankees a 3-1 advantage and put Baltimore in a position where every subsequent scoring opportunity mattered more.
The official MLB coverage of the corresponding game also highlights Rice’s 447-foot home run, describing it as the longest of his career at the time. (MLB.com)
From a statistical perspective, however, Rice’s value was not limited to the home run. His two-hit performance helped New York reach 10 total hits. That distinction matters because a player who produces both power and additional contact can influence multiple parts of an offensive game.
George Lombard Jr. Was Central to the Late-Inning Win
George Lombard Jr. deserves special attention when examining the Yankees’ player statistics.
The supplied data credits him with:
- 2 hits
- 2 RBI
- A sacrifice fly
- The eighth-inning go-ahead RBI single
That combination makes Lombard Jr. one of the most important run producers in the game.
His sacrifice fly in the second inning gave New York a 2-1 lead. Later, with the score tied 3-3, his eighth-inning infield single brought home Ramos and restored the Yankees’ advantage.
The difference between those two plays is particularly interesting.
The second-inning sacrifice fly was a conventional situational baseball play. The eighth-inning single was a late-game pressure play. Both produced exactly one RBI, but the second RBI had greater leverage because it broke a tie in the late innings.
This is why RBI totals alone do not fully describe offensive impact. Context matters.
Jazz Chisholm Jr. Added Value on the Bases
Jazz Chisholm Jr. contributed to the Yankees’ offense through both hitting opportunities and baserunning.
The supplied statistics credit Chisholm Jr. with the Yankees’ 33rd stolen base. He also scored the Yankees’ fifth and final run when a wild pitch allowed him to come home in the eighth inning.
That run was important because it transformed a one-run lead into a two-run advantage.
A two-run lead creates a different pitching environment in the ninth inning than a one-run lead. The defense has more room for error, while the opposing offense must produce multiple runs rather than just one.
This is an example of why stolen bases and baserunning statistics should not be separated entirely from the final score. A runner’s value can continue after reaching base.
Orioles Offensive Leaders: Pete Alonso and Dylan Beavers
Baltimore’s offense was led by two home-run hitters in the supplied statistics.
Pete Alonso
Alonso finished with:
- 1 hit
- 1 run
- 1 RBI
- 1 home run
His third-inning homer traveled an estimated 423 feet and reduced the Yankees’ lead from 3-1 to 3-2.
That swing immediately put Baltimore back into the game.
There was also a significant seventh-inning moment involving Alonso in the corresponding MLB coverage. A potential home run down the left-field line was ruled foul after review, and the call stood because the replay evidence was not considered definitive enough to overturn the ruling. Alonso subsequently struck out, and New York scored twice in the eighth inning. (MLB.com)
That sequence illustrates how baseball games can turn on individual plate appearances without those moments necessarily appearing as conventional box-score statistics.
Dylan Beavers
Beavers also recorded:
- 1 hit
- 1 run
- 1 RBI
- 1 home run
His sixth-inning home run tied the game 3-3.
That was Baltimore’s second home run and temporarily erased the Yankees’ advantage.
Beavers’ performance therefore had a major scoreboard impact despite being limited to one hit. His home run represented one of the Orioles’ most efficient scoring plays of the night.
Leody Taveras Provided Additional Contact
Leody Taveras recorded two hits for Baltimore, making him the Orioles’ leading player in total hits based on the supplied statistics.
That is notable because Baltimore finished with only six hits overall.
Taveras therefore accounted for one-third of the Orioles’ hits. His ability to reach base through contact gave Baltimore opportunities, but the larger issue was converting those opportunities into runs.
Baltimore went 0-for-6 with runners in scoring position. That statistic helps explain why the Orioles could collect six hits and still finish with only three runs.
A team can generate base traffic without maximizing run production if the key hits do not arrive in scoring situations.
Yankees Starting Pitcher Will Warren
Will Warren started for New York and worked four innings.
His supplied pitching line was:
| Statistic | Will Warren |
| Innings | 4.0 |
| Hits | 3 |
| Runs | 2 |
| Earned Runs | 2 |
| Walks | 2 |
| Strikeouts | 5 |
| Home Runs Allowed | 1 |
| Game Score | 51 |
Warren’s outing was not long enough to qualify as a deep start, but his five strikeouts in four innings helped limit Baltimore’s ability to string together multiple productive at-bats.
He allowed Alonso’s home run, which accounted for one of Baltimore’s scoring plays. Even so, he departed with New York positioned to remain competitive.
The game ultimately became a bullpen contest, and that is where the Yankees gained an important advantage.
Chris Bassitt’s Start for Baltimore
Chris Bassitt worked 5.2 innings for the Orioles.
His line was:
| Statistic | Chris Bassitt |
| Innings | 5.2 |
| Hits | 8 |
| Runs | 3 |
| Earned Runs | 3 |
| Walks | 1 |
| Strikeouts | 6 |
| Home Runs Allowed | 1 |
| Game Score | 46 |
Bassitt generated six strikeouts and limited walks to one, but New York’s eight hits against him created sustained pressure.
The most important difference between the two starters was not simply strikeout production. It was the number of hits allowed and the resulting volume of baserunners.
New York’s 10-hit team total shows that its lineup consistently made contact throughout the game.
Brent Headrick Became the Winning Pitcher
Brent Headrick was credited with the win after entering for one inning.
His supplied line:
- 1.0 inning
- 0 hits
- 0 earned runs
- 1 strikeout
- 0 walks
- 7-2 record after the win
That is an efficient relief appearance.
Headrick faced the Orioles without allowing a hit or walk, which prevented Baltimore from extending its late-game threat.
The corresponding official MLB report also identifies Headrick as the winning pitcher after one scoreless inning. (MLB.com)
His contribution is a good example of why relief pitching can have disproportionate importance in close games. A starter may throw several innings, but a reliever entering during a tie game can face a much higher-pressure situation.
Cam Sanders Took the Loss
Cam Sanders was charged with the loss after working two-thirds of an inning.
His line was:
- 0.2 innings
- 0 hits
- 2 earned runs
- 1 strikeout
- 1 walk
- 1-1 record after the game
One interesting feature of this line is that Sanders did not allow a hit, yet two earned runs were charged to him.
That can happen because walks, errors, wild pitches, stolen bases, sacrifice plays, and inherited baserunners can all affect how runs are assigned to pitchers.
In this case, the Yankees’ decisive eighth inning came without Sanders surrendering a conventional base hit. The broader lesson is that pitching evaluation should never rely on hits allowed alone.
David Bednar Closed the Game
David Bednar recorded the save.
His line was:
- 1.0 inning
- 0 hits
- 0 earned runs
- 1 strikeout
- 0 walks
- 29th save
Bednar’s clean ninth inning preserved the Yankees’ 5-3 advantage.
A save can sometimes look routine in a box score, but a closer’s job becomes especially important when the opposing team has already demonstrated home-run power. Baltimore had hit two home runs earlier in the game, so preventing another late rally was essential.
Bednar allowed no baserunners, eliminating the possibility of a multi-run comeback.
The RISP Numbers Explain the Final Result
One of the most useful statistics in this matchup is runners in scoring position.
The Yankees went:
2-for-11
The Orioles went:
0-for-6
That means Baltimore failed to record a hit in any of its six official at-bats with runners in scoring position.
This is probably the clearest statistical explanation for why the Orioles scored only three runs despite hitting two home runs.
New York, meanwhile, converted two opportunities.
The 2-for-11 figure should not be interpreted as evidence that the Yankees were overwhelmingly efficient. They still left nine opportunities without a hit. But Baltimore’s 0-for-6 performance was more damaging because the Orioles had fewer total opportunities and converted none.
This is where context improves a basic box-score reading.
If someone looked only at home runs, Baltimore might appear to have had the stronger offensive performance. If the analysis includes hits and RISP production, the Yankees’ advantage becomes much clearer.
Strikeouts Were Nearly Even
The Yankees struck out 10 times.
The Orioles struck out 11 times.
That difference was minimal.
Both teams therefore experienced significant swing-and-miss, but neither side gained a decisive advantage from strikeout avoidance.
The Yankees made up for their strikeouts by producing 10 hits. Baltimore had fewer hits and therefore had less offensive volume from its remaining plate appearances.
This is another reason to avoid evaluating an entire offense through one statistic.
Strikeouts matter, but they need to be considered alongside hits, walks, home runs, baserunning, and situational hitting.
The Yankees Won the Hit Battle
New York recorded 10 hits in 33 at-bats.
That equals a team batting average of approximately .303 for the game.
Baltimore recorded six hits in 33 at-bats, or approximately .182.
That 121-point difference in single-game batting average is substantial.
The Yankees were simply more successful at putting the ball in play for hits.
Yet even this statistic should be placed in context. Baseball is not won by batting average alone. Baltimore hit two home runs to New York’s one, but the Yankees created four more hits and ultimately scored two additional runs.
The overall offensive profile therefore favored New York because the Yankees combined contact with situational execution.
Baltimore’s Two Home Runs Were Not Enough
The Orioles hit two home runs:
- Pete Alonso, 423 feet
- Dylan Beavers, 389 feet
New York hit one:
- Ben Rice, 447 feet
Baltimore therefore won the home-run count 2-1.
But the Yankees won the game 5-3.
This is a useful reminder that home runs are high-value events, but they do not guarantee victory.
Baltimore’s two solo home runs accounted for two of its three runs. The Orioles needed additional production around those blasts, particularly with runners in scoring position, and did not get it.
New York’s offense was more balanced. The Yankees scored through an RBI single, sacrifice fly, home run, infield single, and wild-pitch run.
That variety made their scoring less dependent on one offensive method.
Baserunning Played a Real Role
The supplied statistics show meaningful baserunning activity from both teams.
The Yankees recorded one stolen base, by Jazz Chisholm Jr.
Baltimore recorded two stolen bases, by Gunnar Henderson and Jackson Holliday.
Holliday’s steal of home was particularly important because it produced the Orioles’ first run.
That play demonstrates the value of aggressive baserunning. Baltimore gained a run without a hit leaving the infield.
However, baserunning opportunities were not enough to overcome the Yankees’ overall offensive advantage.
New York’s eighth-inning run on a wild pitch also shows that runs can come from defensive and pitching pressure rather than conventional hits.
Defensive Execution Was Clean
Neither team committed an error.
The Yankees had zero errors.
The Orioles also had zero errors.
Baltimore did record two double plays, while New York was not credited with a double play in the supplied data.
That makes the loss more revealing for Baltimore because the Orioles did not lose through obvious defensive mistakes.
Their problem was primarily run production and late-game pitching execution.
When a team commits multiple errors, it can be easy to identify a direct cause for defeat. Here, both defenses were clean, so the differences came from hitting, pitching, and situational execution.
Why the Eighth Inning Changed the Game
The eighth inning was the decisive point.
The game entered the inning tied 3-3.
Lombard Jr. then produced an RBI infield single to bring Ramos home.
Chisholm Jr. later scored when a wild pitch got away from the Orioles.
Suddenly, the Yankees had a 5-3 advantage.
That two-run swing was decisive because Baltimore had only one remaining opportunity in the ninth inning.
This is the type of late-game sequence that can be overlooked when someone studies only final player totals. The box score records Lombard Jr. with two RBI and Chisholm Jr. with a run, but the context shows that their contributions directly created the winning margin.
What the Player Stats Say About Each Offense
The Yankees’ offensive identity in this game was built around volume and distribution.
Their key characteristics were:
- 10 hits
- 5 runs
- 1 home run
- 3 walks
- 4 RBI
- 10 strikeouts
- 2-for-11 with runners in scoring position
- 1 stolen base
Baltimore’s profile was different:
- 6 hits
- 3 runs
- 2 home runs
- 3 walks
- 2 RBI
- 11 strikeouts
- 0-for-6 with runners in scoring position
- 2 stolen bases
The Orioles generated more of their scoring through isolated power.
The Yankees generated more of theirs through a mixture of contact, situational hitting, power, and baserunning.
Neither approach is automatically superior in every game. In this particular matchup, however, the Yankees’ broader offensive contribution produced the higher run total.
What the Pitching Numbers Say
The pitching comparison is equally interesting.
New York’s staff allowed:
- 6 hits
- 3 runs
- 3 earned runs
- 3 walks
- 11 strikeouts
- 2 home runs
Baltimore’s staff allowed:
- 10 hits
- 5 runs
- 5 earned runs
- 3 walks
- 10 strikeouts
- 1 home run
The Yankees allowed more home runs but fewer overall hits and runs.
That difference is critical.
Baltimore’s pitchers generated 10 strikeouts and limited walks to three, but New York still accumulated 10 hits.
New York’s staff, meanwhile, generated 11 strikeouts and held Baltimore to six hits.
The Yankees therefore compensated for allowing two home runs by preventing Baltimore from generating enough additional baserunners.
A Deeper Look at Game Flow
The game followed a classic back-and-forth pattern.
Baltimore struck first.
New York responded twice.
Rice extended the lead.
Alonso pulled Baltimore closer.
Beavers tied the game.
Then New York took control in the eighth.
This progression shows why early leads are not necessarily predictive of the final result.
The Yankees’ 3-1 advantage disappeared by the sixth inning. Baltimore demonstrated enough offensive power to tie the contest.
The deciding factor was what happened after the tie.
New York continued creating pressure, while Baltimore failed to convert its opportunities.
That distinction is especially important for readers looking at player statistics after the game. A player’s contribution should be understood according to when it happened and what it changed.
What Readers Should Look for in a Baseball Player Stats Box Score
When analyzing a close MLB game, the most useful approach is to move beyond runs and home runs.
A practical checklist is:
1. Compare total hits
Hits provide a basic measure of offensive contact.
2. Check runners in scoring position
This shows whether a team converted opportunities when a run was more immediately available.
3. Look at walks
Walks can create scoring opportunities even when a team is not producing many hits.
4. Examine home runs
Power can change the scoreboard quickly, but it should be considered alongside other offensive production.
5. Review starting pitcher workload
Innings, hits, walks, strikeouts, and earned runs reveal how much pressure the bullpen inherited.
6. Examine late-inning relief
A one-inning appearance in a tie game can be more consequential than a routine scoreless inning earlier in the contest.
7. Study baserunning
Stolen bases, extra bases, wild pitches, and defensive positioning can influence runs without appearing in the hit column.
This approach gives a much more complete understanding of what actually happened.
The Biggest Statistical Takeaways
Several conclusions stand out from the supplied data.
New York won through overall offensive volume. The Yankees had 10 hits compared with Baltimore’s six.
Baltimore’s power was real but incomplete. The Orioles hit two home runs, but those blasts accounted for only two of their three runs.
Situational hitting favored New York. The Yankees were 2-for-11 with runners in scoring position, while Baltimore went 0-for-6.
The bullpens influenced the final result. Headrick delivered a scoreless inning for New York, while Sanders was charged with the loss after the Yankees took control late.
Baserunning mattered. Baltimore stole two bases, including home, while Chisholm Jr.’s baserunning helped New York produce its final run.
Defense did not decide the game. Both teams finished without an error.
The eighth inning was decisive. New York turned a 3-3 tie into a 5-3 lead and held that margin.
Series Context
The supplied data identifies the matchup as part of a three-game series won by the Yankees 3-0.
The listed series results were:
- Game 1: Yankees 3, Orioles 1
- Game 2: Yankees 5, Orioles 3
- Game 3: Yankees 6, Orioles 1
That progression is notable because the Yankees improved their offensive margin across the series while also limiting Baltimore’s scoring.
However, the individual 5-3 game remained competitive deep into the contest.
For readers researching the series, it is useful to separate the series-level result from the individual game analysis. A sweep can contain very different game scripts, and this particular contest was defined by a late eighth-inning separation rather than an early runaway.
Final Assessment of the Player Statistics
The most useful way to understand the game is to view the player statistics as a connected chain rather than a collection of isolated numbers.
Rice provided power.
Lombard Jr. supplied timely RBI production.
Chisholm Jr. contributed through baserunning.
Warren gave New York four competitive innings.
Headrick protected a tie game.
Bednar closed the door.
For Baltimore, Alonso and Beavers supplied the home runs, while Taveras provided two hits. Yet the Orioles could not turn enough of their opportunities into additional runs.
The most revealing number may therefore be neither the home-run total nor the strikeout count.
It is the difference between 2-for-11 and 0-for-6 with runners in scoring position.
That number captures the central story of the game: both teams had chances, but New York converted enough of them at the right moments.
For readers who want to verify the official game record, MLB’s game coverage provides the authoritative league-level reference for the matchup and its play-by-play events. MLB official game coverage
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Yankees and Orioles?
The supplied game data records a 5-3 Yankees victory over the Orioles.
Who hit home runs in the game?
The supplied statistics credit Ben Rice with a home run for New York, while Pete Alonso and Dylan Beavers hit home runs for Baltimore.
Who was the winning pitcher?
Brent Headrick was credited with the win after pitching one scoreless inning with one strikeout and no walks.
Who recorded the save?
David Bednar recorded the save, his 29th, after pitching a scoreless ninth inning.
Which team had more hits?
The Yankees had 10 hits, while the Orioles had six.
Why did the Yankees win despite hitting fewer home runs?
New York produced more total hits and converted two of 11 opportunities with runners in scoring position. Baltimore hit two home runs but went 0-for-6 with runners in scoring position.
Conclusion
The baltimore orioles vs new york yankees match player stats show a game decided by more than the final 5-3 score.
The Orioles produced two home runs and used aggressive baserunning to create early pressure. Pete Alonso and Dylan Beavers supplied important power, while Leody Taveras recorded two hits. Yet Baltimore’s inability to produce a hit in six at-bats with runners in scoring position limited its offensive ceiling.
The Yankees created a different kind of offensive profile. They collected 10 hits, received two-hit performances from Ben Rice and George Lombard Jr., and combined power with situational hitting. Rice’s long home run gave New York an important early cushion, while Lombard Jr.’s eighth-inning RBI single became the key late offensive play.
On the mound, Will Warren and Chris Bassitt both had competitive starts, but neither went deep enough to finish the game. The late innings therefore placed greater responsibility on the bullpens. Headrick’s clean inning and Bednar’s scoreless save were particularly important for New York, while Sanders was charged with the loss after the Yankees created their decisive advantage.
The clearest statistical lesson is that baseball games are rarely explained by one number. Baltimore hit more home runs, but New York had more hits. Both teams made no errors. Both teams left seven runners on base. The Yankees struck out 10 times and the Orioles 11. The decisive difference came from how the teams handled scoring opportunities and how they performed when the game reached its most important late-inning moments.
For anyone studying baltimore orioles vs new york yankees match player stats, the matchup is a strong example of why a complete box-score analysis should include hitting volume, power, situational hitting, pitching efficiency, bullpen performance, and baserunning rather than focusing on the final score alone.
