Dallas Cowboys vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats
The Dallas Cowboys vs Las Vegas Raiders match player stats from November 18, 2025, tell the story of a 33-16 Dallas victory built on efficient quarterback play, explosive receiving, and a defense that consistently disrupted Las Vegas. Dak Prescott delivered four passing touchdowns without an interception, while George Pickens produced 144 receiving yards to lead the Cowboys’ offense. On the other side, Geno Smith threw for 238 yards but struggled to match Prescott’s efficiency under pressure.
The final score only explains part of the game. Dallas established control with a 21-point second quarter, extended its advantage after halftime, and limited the Raiders to just 27 rushing yards as a team. Las Vegas had more total receptions and its kicker Daniel Carlson converted all three field-goal attempts, but those contributions were not enough to overcome the Cowboys’ advantage in scoring efficiency.
This breakdown examines the passing, rushing, receiving, defensive, and special-teams numbers to explain why Dallas won, which players made the greatest impact, and what the statistics reveal beyond the scoreboard.
Dallas Cowboys vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The matchup took place on November 18, 2025, with Dallas defeating Las Vegas by 17 points. The figures below provide the essential context for understanding the individual performances.
| Game detail | Result |
| Matchup | Dallas Cowboys vs Las Vegas Raiders |
| Date | November 18, 2025 |
| Final score | Cowboys 33, Raiders 16 |
| Winning team | Dallas Cowboys |
| Losing team | Las Vegas Raiders |
| Dallas quarterback | Dak Prescott |
| Las Vegas quarterback | Geno Smith |
| Dallas passing touchdowns | 4 |
| Las Vegas passing touchdowns | 1 |
| Dallas team rushing yards | 114 |
| Las Vegas team rushing yards | 27 |
| Dallas interceptions recorded | 1 |
| Las Vegas interceptions recorded | 0 |
Dallas combined four passing touchdowns with a productive ground game and a defense that recorded four sacks. Las Vegas managed 16 points, but its offense lacked the same balance. The Raiders finished with just 27 rushing yards, making it harder to sustain drives and keep the Cowboys’ defense from focusing on Smith’s passing game.
The most important statistical difference was not simply the 17-point margin. It was how effectively Dallas turned its offensive opportunities into touchdowns while Las Vegas relied more heavily on field goals.
Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring Breakdown
The scoring pattern explains how Dallas turned a competitive opening period into a comfortable victory. Las Vegas actually led 6-3 after the first quarter, but the Cowboys responded with a decisive offensive surge in the second.
| Quarter | Dallas Cowboys | Las Vegas Raiders |
| First quarter | 3 | 6 |
| Second quarter | 21 | 3 |
| Third quarter | 7 | 0 |
| Fourth quarter | 2 | 7 |
| Final score | 33 | 16 |
First Quarter: Las Vegas Takes an Early Lead
The Raiders opened the scoring with a 35-yard field goal from Daniel Carlson. Brandon Aubrey answered with a 50-yard field goal for Dallas, but Carlson converted another attempt from 45 yards to give Las Vegas a 6-3 advantage.
The early scoring suggested that the Raiders could compete, particularly when they reached field-goal range. However, field goals alone would not be enough if the Cowboys started finishing their drives with touchdowns.
Second Quarter: Prescott Changes the Game
Dallas scored 21 points in the second quarter, with Prescott throwing touchdown passes to CeeDee Lamb, Jake Ferguson, and George Pickens.
The Cowboys’ scoring sequence demonstrated three different ways to attack a defense:
- CeeDee Lamb: An 18-yard touchdown reception.
- Jake Ferguson: A five-yard touchdown reception after a sustained drive.
- George Pickens: A 37-yard touchdown reception that punished the Raiders downfield.
The Cowboys moved from a three-point deficit to a 24-6 lead before Carlson added a field goal at the end of the half. The resulting 24-9 halftime score gave Dallas a substantial advantage.
Third Quarter: Dallas Extends Its Control
Prescott connected with Ryan Flournoy for a two-yard touchdown to finish an 80-yard scoring drive. Dallas led 31-9, and the Raiders still had not scored a touchdown.
The seven-point quarter was important because it showed that Dallas could sustain an effective drive after its explosive second-quarter performance. The Cowboys were no longer relying exclusively on big plays to create separation.
Fourth Quarter: The Raiders Respond, but Dallas Finishes Ahead
Las Vegas finally reached the end zone when Geno Smith threw a six-yard touchdown pass to Tre Tucker. Carlson’s extra point brought the score to 31-16.
Dallas then recorded a safety, adding two points and restoring its 17-point margin. The final score of 33-16 reflected both the Cowboys’ offensive production and their ability to generate a decisive defensive play late in the contest.
Dak Prescott vs Geno Smith: Quarterback Stats Compared
The quarterback comparison is central to understanding the outcome. Both passers exceeded 230 passing yards, but Prescott converted his opportunities into touchdowns at a much higher rate.
| Passing statistic | Dak Prescott | Geno Smith |
| Completions | 25 | 27 |
| Pass attempts | 33 | 42 |
| Completion percentage | 75.8% | 64.3% |
| Passing yards | 268 | 238 |
| Yards per attempt | 8.1 | 5.7 |
| Passing touchdowns | 4 | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 1 |
| Sacks taken | 1 | 4 |
| Sack yards lost | 1 | 29 |
| Passer rating | 138.6 | 77.3 |
| ESPN QBR | 87.0 | 17.2 |
Completion percentages are calculated from the listed completions and attempts. Other figures follow the supplied game statistics.
Dak Prescott’s Efficient Performance
Prescott completed 25 of 33 passes for 268 yards and four touchdowns. His 75.8% completion rate was strong, but the more revealing figures were his 8.1 yards per attempt and four touchdown passes.
He did not need to throw 40 or more passes to move the offense. Instead, he combined accuracy with downfield production, allowing Dallas to create scoring opportunities without excessive passing volume.
His four touchdown passes went to four different receivers: Lamb, Ferguson, Pickens, and Flournoy. This distribution made the Cowboys’ passing attack more difficult to defend because the Raiders could not focus on stopping a single scoring target.
Prescott also avoided interceptions. Although he recorded one fumble that was lost, his passing decisions kept the Raiders from taking possession through an interception.
His 138.6 passer rating and 87.0 ESPN QBR further illustrate the difference between his performance and Smith’s. These measurements use different methods, so they should not be treated as interchangeable, but both favored Prescott in this game.
Geno Smith’s Difficult Night
Smith completed 27 of 42 passes for 238 yards, one touchdown, and one interception. His completion percentage was respectable, but his 5.7 yards per attempt indicates that his passing production was less efficient.
The four sacks were another major concern. Smith lost 29 yards on those plays, and repeated pressure made it more difficult for Las Vegas to maintain productive possessions.
The Raiders also faced a difficult situation on the offensive line, with key starters unavailable. That context matters when evaluating Smith’s performance. Quarterback statistics describe the result of a play, but they do not always capture how much time a passer had to read the defense or deliver the ball.
Smith did throw a touchdown to Tucker in the fourth quarter. However, the late score came after Dallas had already established a commanding lead.
Which Quarterback Had the Greater Impact?
Prescott was the clear statistical winner. He threw three more touchdown passes, averaged 2.4 more yards per attempt, and avoided interceptions.
Smith attempted nine additional passes but produced 30 fewer passing yards. That difference highlights the distinction between passing volume and passing efficiency.
Prescott’s performance was especially effective because the touchdowns arrived at critical moments. His second-quarter scoring burst transformed a narrow deficit into a 15-point halftime lead, changing the strategic demands on the Raiders for the remainder of the game.
Dallas Cowboys Rushing Stats
The Dallas ground game did not produce a rushing touchdown, but it contributed valuable yardage and helped prevent the offense from becoming one-dimensional.
| Dallas player | Carries | Rushing yards | Average | Longest run | Rushing TDs |
| Javonte Williams | 22 | 93 | 4.2 | 16 yards | 0 |
| Malik Davis | 4 | 20 | 5.0 | 9 yards | 0 |
| Hunter Luepke | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 5 yards | 0 |
| Dak Prescott | 4 | -4 | -1.0 | Not listed | 0 |
| Team total | 31 | 114 | 3.7 | 16 yards | 0 |
Javonte Williams Leads the Ground Attack
Williams was Dallas’ leading rusher with 93 yards on 22 carries. His average of 4.2 yards per attempt gave the Cowboys a reliable source of yardage between their passing plays.
Although Williams did not score a rushing touchdown, his role was still important. Consistent runs can help an offense avoid predictable passing situations, keep defenders closer to the line of scrimmage, and create more favorable passing opportunities.
His 16-yard longest run also gave Dallas some explosive ground production without requiring a series of low-percentage deep throws.
Malik Davis Adds Useful Support
Davis recorded 20 yards on four carries, averaging five yards per attempt. His limited workload made his overall contribution smaller than Williams’, but the efficiency was encouraging.
Luepke added five rushing yards on one attempt. Prescott, meanwhile, finished with minus-four rushing yards on four carries.
The quarterback’s negative rushing total did not undermine his passing performance. It simply shows why passing and rushing production should be evaluated separately rather than treating every quarterback movement as a positive contribution.
Why Dallas’ Rushing Numbers Matter
Dallas gained 114 team rushing yards, compared with 27 for Las Vegas. That 87-yard difference helped the Cowboys control the physical side of the matchup.
The Cowboys’ 31 rushing attempts also provided a meaningful balance to their 33 passing attempts. This near-even distribution gave Dallas flexibility and made it harder for the Raiders to anticipate every play based on formation or down-and-distance alone.
The lesson is not that a team must always run as often as it passes. Rather, Dallas benefited from having a productive ground game available alongside an efficient quarterback.
Las Vegas Raiders Rushing Stats
The Raiders struggled to establish a consistent rushing threat, finishing with just 27 yards on 12 carries.
| Las Vegas player | Carries | Rushing yards | Average | Rushing TDs |
| Geno Smith | 4 | 14 | 3.5 | 0 |
| Ashton Jeanty | 6 | 7 | 1.2 | 0 |
| Raheem Mostert | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Team total | 12 | 27 | 2.3 | 0 |
Ashton Jeanty Faces a Difficult Matchup
Jeanty recorded seven rushing yards on six carries, averaging 1.2 yards per attempt. Those numbers indicate that Las Vegas struggled to create useful gains on the ground.
A rushing average this low makes it difficult to stay ahead of the chains. Short gains can lead to third-and-long situations, forcing the offense to rely on passing plays against a defense that knows a throw is likely.
Jeanty also contributed as a receiver, catching six passes for 27 yards. That gave the Raiders another way to involve him, although his receiving production did not compensate for the limited ground attack.
Smith and Mostert Provide Limited Yardage
Smith led the Raiders in rushing yards with 14 on four attempts. Mostert added six yards on two carries.
The team average of 2.3 yards per carry was considerably below Dallas’ 3.7. The gap mattered because it limited the Raiders’ ability to sustain drives through a balanced offense.
Las Vegas did not necessarily need a huge rushing total to compete, but it needed enough success to keep the passing game manageable. With Dallas applying pressure and the Raiders falling behind, the ground game never became a reliable solution.
Dallas Cowboys Receiving Stats
Dallas’ receivers played a major role in turning Prescott’s passing production into four touchdowns. Pickens led the group in yardage, while Lamb and Ferguson also scored.
| Receiver | Receptions | Targets | Receiving yards | Yards per catch | Longest catch | TDs |
| George Pickens | 9 | 11 | 144 | 16.0 | 37 yards | 1 |
| CeeDee Lamb | 5 | 7 | 66 | 13.2 | 23 yards | 1 |
| Hunter Luepke | 3 | Not specified | 36 | 12.0 | 15 yards | 0 |
| Jake Ferguson | 4 | 5 | 16 | 4.0 | 7 yards | 1 |
| Brevyn Spann-Ford | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 4 yards | 0 |
| Ryan Flournoy | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 2 yards | 1 |
| KaVontae Turpin | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 yards | 0 |
| Jalen Tolbert | 0 | Not specified | 0 | Not applicable | Not applicable | 0 |
| Javonte Williams | 1 | Not specified | 0 | 0.0 | 0 yards | 0 |
| Team total | 25 | 32 | 268 | 10.7 | 37 yards | 4 |
George Pickens Is the Leading Receiver
Pickens delivered the most productive receiving performance of the game, finishing with nine catches for 144 yards and a touchdown on 11 targets.
His 16 yards per reception show that he combined dependable involvement with the ability to gain substantial yardage on individual plays. His longest reception was a 37-yard touchdown, one of the defining moments of Dallas’ second-quarter surge.
Pickens accounted for more than half of Prescott’s passing yardage. Specifically, his 144 yards represented approximately 53.7% of the Cowboys’ 268 passing yards.
That concentration highlights his importance, but it should not be mistaken for a one-player offense. Dallas also received touchdowns from three other targets, meaning Pickens’ production complemented a wider passing attack.
CeeDee Lamb Provides Another Scoring Threat
Lamb recorded five catches for 66 yards and a touchdown on seven targets. His 13.2 yards per reception reflected solid downfield production, and his 18-yard touchdown helped Dallas take the lead early in the second quarter.
Lamb’s contribution was important because he gave Prescott another established option who could punish defensive mistakes. When a defense must account for both Lamb and Pickens, coverage decisions become more complicated.
Jake Ferguson and Ryan Flournoy Finish Drives
Ferguson caught four passes for 16 yards and a touchdown. His five-yard scoring reception came after a sustained Cowboys drive.
Flournoy caught one pass for two yards, but it resulted in a touchdown. His contribution is a useful reminder that receiving yardage does not tell the entire story. A short catch at the goal line can be more valuable to the scoreboard than a longer reception far from the end zone.
Luepke also added three catches for 36 yards, providing a useful secondary option.
The Receiving Group’s Overall Impact
Dallas completed 25 passes for 268 yards, averaging 10.7 yards per reception. The four passing touchdowns came from four different players.
The important pattern was the combination of explosive production and situational execution. Pickens stretched the field, Lamb delivered a significant scoring play, and Ferguson and Flournoy converted opportunities near the end zone.
That variety made Dallas’ passing game productive in more than one area of the field.
Las Vegas Raiders Receiving Stats
The Raiders recorded 27 receptions for 238 yards and one touchdown. Their leading receiver, Brock Bowers, produced a solid individual performance, but the passing game did not generate touchdowns at the same rate as Dallas.
| Receiver | Receptions | Targets | Receiving yards | Yards per catch | Longest catch | TDs |
| Brock Bowers | 7 | 12 | 72 | 10.3 | 18 yards | 0 |
| Tre Tucker | 4 | 8 | 47 | 11.8 | 26 yards | 1 |
| Tyler Lockett | 3 | Not specified | 33 | 11.0 | 15 yards | 0 |
| Ashton Jeanty | 6 | Not specified | 27 | 4.5 | 8 yards | 0 |
| Ian Thomas | 1 | Not specified | 20 | 20.0 | 20 yards | 0 |
| Jack Bech | 1 | Not specified | 19 | 19.0 | 19 yards | 0 |
| Michael Mayer | 3 | Not specified | 13 | 4.3 | 8 yards | 0 |
| Raheem Mostert | 2 | Not specified | 7 | 3.5 | 4 yards | 0 |
| Team total | 27 | 39 | 238 | 8.8 | 26 yards | 1 |
Brock Bowers Leads the Raiders
Bowers finished with seven receptions for 72 yards on 12 targets. He was the Raiders’ leading receiver by yardage and remained a significant part of their passing attack.
His 12 targets show that Smith looked his way frequently. However, Bowers did not record a touchdown, so his involvement did not translate into the same scoring impact as the Cowboys’ top receivers.
This distinction matters when evaluating a receiver’s game. Targets can indicate involvement, catches demonstrate successful connections, and yardage measures the ground gained. Touchdowns show whether those opportunities helped produce points.
Bowers contributed in the first three categories, but Dallas had the advantage in the fourth.
Tre Tucker Provides the Raiders’ Touchdown
Tucker caught four passes for 47 yards and scored the Raiders’ only offensive touchdown. His six-yard reception in the fourth quarter gave Las Vegas its first touchdown of the game.
He averaged 11.8 yards per reception, showing that he offered more than short, routine catches. His longest reception was 26 yards, the longest individual gain among the Raiders’ receivers in this statistical summary.
However, the touchdown came when Dallas was already ahead 31-9. It narrowed the margin but did not fundamentally change the game’s direction.
Other Contributors in the Passing Game
Lockett added 33 yards on three catches, while Jeanty recorded six receptions for 27 yards. Thomas and Bech each contributed a catch of at least 19 yards, but neither found the end zone.
Mayer and Mostert added shorter receptions, giving Smith several options across the offense. Yet the Raiders struggled to turn that distribution into sustained scoring.
Why the Raiders’ Receiving Numbers Were Not Enough
Las Vegas had more receptions than Dallas, with 27 compared with 25. However, it averaged 8.8 yards per catch, below the Cowboys’ 10.7.
The Raiders also had more targets, 39 compared with Dallas’ 32, while producing only one passing touchdown. Dallas scored four.
The difference demonstrates why catch totals should never be viewed in isolation. A passing attack can complete many short throws without consistently creating high-value scoring opportunities. In this matchup, the Cowboys were more effective at converting their passing production into touchdowns.
Defensive Player Stats: Tackles, Sacks, and Interceptions
Dallas’ defense helped preserve the lead by putting pressure on Smith, disrupting the Raiders’ running game, and recording an interception.
| Defensive statistic | Dallas Cowboys | Las Vegas Raiders |
| Total tackles | 65 | 78 |
| Solo tackles | 35 | 32 |
| Sacks | 4 | 1 |
| Tackles for loss | 8 | 2 |
| Passes defended | 8 | 3 |
| Quarterback hits | 11 | 4 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 0 |
| Defensive touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
DaRon Bland Leads Dallas in Tackles
Bland led Dallas with 10 total tackles. Markquese Bell recorded the Cowboys’ interception, returning it 24 yards without scoring a touchdown.
The interception was important because it ended a Raiders passing opportunity and gave Dallas a defensive takeaway. Turnovers can shift momentum by preventing an offense from finishing a drive and potentially giving the opposing offense another possession.
Dallas also recorded four sacks and 11 quarterback hits. These numbers suggest that the defense repeatedly made Smith operate under pressure.
Eight tackles for loss further demonstrate how the Cowboys disrupted plays before the Raiders could develop them. The low rushing total supports that interpretation.
Devin White Leads the Raiders’ Tackles
White recorded 10 total tackles for Las Vegas. The Raiders actually finished with more total tackles than Dallas, 78 to 65.
However, that does not mean the Raiders’ defense performed better overall. Tackle totals can rise when an opponent sustains drives and completes numerous plays. They do not automatically measure how often a defense stops an offense from scoring.
Las Vegas recorded one sack, two tackles for loss, three passes defended, and four quarterback hits. Each figure was lower than Dallas’ corresponding total.
The Raiders also failed to record an interception. Against a quarterback who threw four touchdowns and no interceptions, that absence made it more difficult to interrupt Dallas’ offensive rhythm.
The Value of Pressure Beyond Sacks
Sacks are easy to identify, but quarterback pressure can influence a game even when it does not result in a loss of yardage.
Pressure can force a quarterback to release the ball earlier, abandon a preferred target, or throw from an uncomfortable position. The Cowboys’ 11 quarterback hits compared with four for Las Vegas point to a substantial difference in defensive disruption.
The available statistics do not identify the result of every pressured dropback, so they cannot establish precisely how many passes were affected. Nevertheless, the combined sack, hit, and tackle-for-loss totals strongly favor Dallas.
Special Teams Stats: Kickers, Punters, and Returns
Special teams provided useful contributions for both sides, particularly through field goals and return yardage. The key difference was that Dallas’ special-teams scoring supported a more productive overall offense.
Kicking Comparison
| Kicker | Field goals | Longest field goal | Extra points | Total points |
| Brandon Aubrey, Dallas | 1/1 | 50 yards | 4/4 | 7 |
| Daniel Carlson, Las Vegas | 3/3 | 45 yards | 1/1 | 10 |
Aubrey converted his only field-goal attempt, a 50-yarder, and made all four extra points. Carlson converted three field goals and one extra point, scoring 10 points.
Carlson’s accuracy kept Las Vegas competitive early, but the Raiders’ reliance on field goals became a limitation once Dallas began scoring touchdowns. Three successful field goals produce nine points, while three touchdowns followed by successful extra points produce 21.
The difference is a reminder that kicking accuracy and offensive finishing are separate measures of performance.
Punting Comparison
| Punter | Punts | Total yards | Average | Longest punt | Inside the 20 |
| Bryan Anger, Dallas | 2 | 93 | 46.5 | 49 yards | 1 |
| AJ Cole, Las Vegas | 3 | 160 | 53.3 | 64 yards | 1 |
Cole averaged more yards per punt and produced the longest punt of the two. Anger punted twice, compared with three attempts for Cole.
A higher punting average is useful, but it does not automatically mean that the punter’s team had the better game. Punt distance must be considered alongside field position, the number of possessions, and the offense’s ability to score.
Kick and Punt Returns
KaVontae Turpin led Dallas in kick returns with four returns for 111 yards, averaging 27.8 yards per return. His longest return was 39 yards. He also returned one punt for 14 yards.
For Las Vegas, Dylan Laube returned four kicks for 94 yards, while Mostert added two returns for 42 yards. The Raiders’ team total was six returns for 136 yards, an average of 22.7 yards per return.
Tucker returned two punts for four yards, averaging two yards per return.
Turpin’s return average gave Dallas a useful advantage in kick-return efficiency. Even without a return touchdown, a strong return can improve starting field position and reduce the distance an offense must travel to reach scoring range.
Team Statistics: Why Dallas Won
Individual player performances explain much of the game, but team totals show how those performances combined.
| Team statistic | Dallas Cowboys | Las Vegas Raiders |
| Final points | 33 | 16 |
| Total net yards | 381 | 236 |
| Passing yards | 268 | 238 |
| Rushing yards | 114 | 27 |
| Total tackles | 65 | 78 |
| Sacks | 4 | 1 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 0 |
| Time of possession | 33:36 | 26:24 |
| Penalties | 6 | 6 |
| Penalty yards | 50 | 40 |
Dallas gained 381 total net yards, while Las Vegas recorded 236. The 145-yard difference shows that the Cowboys created more overall offensive production.
The teams were closer in passing yards than in rushing yards. Dallas gained 268 passing yards, compared with 238 for Las Vegas. The larger gap came on the ground, where the Cowboys gained 114 yards and the Raiders managed just 27.
Dallas also held the ball for 33 minutes and 36 seconds, more than seven minutes longer than Las Vegas. Sustained possessions can help an offense build momentum while limiting the time available to the opposing offense.
Penalty totals were relatively close. Dallas committed six penalties for 50 yards, and Las Vegas committed six for 40 yards. Penalties therefore do not appear to explain the main statistical gap between the teams.
The strongest indicators were Dallas’ yardage advantage, passing efficiency, four sacks, and ability to convert passing opportunities into touchdowns.
What the Match Player Stats Reveal Beyond the Score
A box score becomes more useful when the numbers are interpreted together rather than viewed as separate achievements.
1. Touchdown Efficiency Was More Important Than Passing Volume
Smith completed two more passes than Prescott and attempted nine more throws. Yet Prescott produced four touchdown passes to Smith’s one.
The difference was not simply the number of successful completions. Dallas gained more yards per attempt and finished its opportunities with touchdowns. The Raiders moved the ball through the air but did not score often enough to keep pace.
2. Dallas Had a More Balanced Offense
The Cowboys combined 268 passing yards with 114 rushing yards. Las Vegas produced 238 passing yards but only 27 rushing yards.
Dallas could threaten the Raiders through multiple offensive approaches. Las Vegas had less success running the ball, making it harder to create favorable situations for Smith.
Balance does not require identical rushing and passing totals. It means that an offense has credible options and can adjust its approach according to the defense and game situation.
3. Defensive Pressure Limited the Raiders’ Options
Four Dallas sacks, 11 quarterback hits, and eight tackles for loss indicate a defense that repeatedly disrupted offensive plays.
Smith’s 29 sack yards lost also affected the Raiders’ ability to maintain field position and sustain drives. Pressure alone does not explain every incomplete pass or stalled possession, but it formed an important part of Dallas’ advantage.
4. Dallas Spread Its Touchdowns Across Four Receivers
Pickens, Lamb, Ferguson, and Flournoy each caught a touchdown pass. This distribution indicates that Prescott successfully found multiple scoring options.
A team that can score through different receivers gives the opposing defense more players to account for near the end zone. It also reduces dependence on a single receiver having an exceptional game.
5. The Scoreboard Reflects More Than One Dominant Quarter
Dallas’ 21-point second quarter was the decisive scoring period. But the Cowboys also scored seven points in the third quarter and two in the fourth.
The third-quarter touchdown helped preserve separation, while the fourth-quarter safety added insurance after Tucker’s touchdown. Dallas therefore did more than build a lead quickly. It also maintained the advantage through the closing stages.
Historical Context and Statistical Limitations
The November 2025 matchup provides a useful case study in offensive efficiency, but one game should not be treated as a complete measure of either team’s long-term ability.
Prescott’s four-touchdown performance demonstrates what the Cowboys accomplished on that occasion. It does not, by itself, establish how consistently he would perform against other defenses.
Likewise, Smith’s low QBR and four sacks describe a difficult game, but the Raiders’ offensive-line absences provide relevant context. Evaluating a quarterback fairly requires considering protection, play design, receiver availability, and the game situation alongside passing totals.
A few distinctions are particularly important when reading the figures:
- Passing yards are not total offensive yards. Team totals can include rushing production and account for yardage lost on sacks.
- A target is not a reception. Targets measure opportunities, while receptions measure completed catches.
- Tackles are not a direct measure of defensive success. A defense can record many tackles while allowing long drives.
- Kicker points are not the same as offensive touchdowns. Field goals reward successful attempts, but they produce fewer points than touchdowns.
- One game does not establish a season-long trend. Broader conclusions require comparing multiple games and considering opponent quality.
The most reliable interpretation comes from combining the box score with the scoring sequence and the wider team statistics. For the official game record, see the ESPN Cowboys vs Raiders box score.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What was the final score of the Dallas Cowboys vs Las Vegas Raiders game?
The Dallas Cowboys defeated the Las Vegas Raiders 33-16 in their November 2025 matchup. Dallas scored 21 points in the second quarter and maintained its lead through the rest of the game.
2. How many passing yards did Dak Prescott record against the Raiders?
Dak Prescott completed 25 of 33 passes for 268 yards, four touchdowns, and no interceptions. He finished with an 8.1 yards-per-attempt average and a 138.6 passer rating.
3. Who was the leading receiver in the game?
George Pickens led all receivers with nine catches for 144 yards and one touchdown on 11 targets. His 37-yard touchdown reception was one of Dallas’ defining scoring plays.
4. How many rushing yards did the Raiders record?
Las Vegas recorded 27 team rushing yards on 12 attempts, averaging 2.3 yards per carry. Ashton Jeanty gained seven rushing yards on six carries, while Geno Smith added 14 yards.
5. Which defense recorded more sacks?
The Dallas Cowboys recorded four sacks, while the Las Vegas Raiders recorded one. Dallas also had 11 quarterback hits compared with four for Las Vegas, indicating greater disruption of the opposing passing game.
6. How did the Cowboys build their winning margin?
Dallas built its lead with three touchdown passes in the second quarter and added another in the third. Prescott’s four passing touchdowns, the Cowboys’ 114 rushing yards, and a late safety helped secure the 33-16 result.
Conclusion
The Dallas Cowboys vs Las Vegas Raiders match player stats show how Dallas combined efficient passing, a productive running game, and disruptive defense to earn a 33-16 victory. Dak Prescott completed 25 of 33 passes for 268 yards and four touchdowns, while George Pickens led the receiving group with 144 yards and a touchdown. Javonte Williams added 93 rushing yards, giving Dallas another dependable source of offensive production.
For Las Vegas, Geno Smith finished with 238 passing yards, one touchdown, and one interception. Brock Bowers led the Raiders in receiving yards, and Daniel Carlson converted all three field-goal attempts. However, the Raiders’ 27 rushing yards and limited touchdown production made it difficult to match Dallas’ scoring pace.
The second quarter proved decisive, as Dallas scored 21 points to turn an early deficit into a commanding halftime lead. The Cowboys then extended their advantage in the third quarter and added a safety late in the fourth.
Ultimately, the numbers reveal a clear difference in execution. Dallas converted passing opportunities into touchdowns, gained more total yards, controlled possession for longer, and generated more defensive pressure. Las Vegas produced some useful individual performances, but its offense lacked the balance and scoring efficiency needed to overcome the Cowboys.
