Denver Broncos vs New York Jets Match Player Stats
The Denver Broncos vs New York Jets match player stats from October 12, 2025, tell the story of a hard-fought NFL game in which defensive pressure, quarterback protection, and late-game execution made the difference. The Broncos defeated the Jets 13-11 at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium in London during Week 6 of the 2025 NFL regular season. Denver finished with nine sacks, while New York managed only 45 gross passing yards and struggled to protect quarterback Justin Fields.
ESPN (SG)
+1
The final score suggests a close contest, but the underlying numbers reveal why Denver came away with the victory. Bo Nix delivered a touchdown pass and avoided interceptions, J.K. Dobbins led Denver’s rushing attack, and Nate Adkins caught the game’s only offensive touchdown. On the other side, Breece Hall produced more rushing yards than any other Jets player, but New York could not generate enough passing offense to turn its opportunities into a win.
This breakdown examines the final score, quarterback statistics, rushing and receiving performances, defensive contributions, special teams, and the decisive moments that shaped the result. It also explains how to interpret the numbers rather than simply listing individual performances.
Denver Broncos vs New York Jets Match Player Stats: Final Score and Game Summary
Denver Broncos
Week 6 · Record after game: 4-2
13
New York Jets
Week 6 · Record after game: 0-6
11
October 12, 2025 · Tottenham Hotspur Stadium · London, England
Denver won by two points, improving its record to 4-2, while the Jets fell to 0-6. The game featured a low-scoring first half, no points from either team in the second quarter, a safety in the third quarter, and a decisive Denver field goal in the fourth.
Final score by quarter
| Quarter | Denver Broncos | New York Jets |
| First | 10 | 6 |
| Second | 0 | 0 |
| Third | 0 | 5 |
| Fourth | 3 | 0 |
| Final | 13 | 11 |
The first quarter gave Denver an early advantage through a 57-yard field goal by Wil Lutz and a touchdown reception by Nate Adkins. New York stayed within reach through two first-quarter field goals from Nick Folk.
Neither team scored in the second quarter. The Jets then moved ahead 11-10 during the third quarter after another Folk field goal and a safety resulting from an offensive holding penalty against Denver guard Quinn Meinerz in the end zone.
Denver regained the lead in the fourth quarter when Lutz converted a 27-yard field goal. The Broncos’ defense subsequently prevented New York from completing a comeback.
The outcome illustrates an important point about close NFL games: a team’s ability to protect its quarterback, avoid drive-ending mistakes, and deliver in critical situations can matter more than its total rushing attempts or individual yardage leaders.
Quarterback Stats: Bo Nix vs Justin Fields
Quarterback performance was the clearest statistical difference between the teams. Bo Nix gave Denver a more productive passing game, while Justin Fields faced constant pressure and finished with only 45 passing yards.
Passing statistics comparison
| Passing statistic | Bo Nix, Denver | Justin Fields, New York |
| Completions | 19 | 9 |
| Attempts | 30 | 17 |
| Completion percentage | 63.3% | 52.9% |
| Gross passing yards | 174 | 45 |
| Yards per attempt | 5.8 | 2.6 |
| Passing touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Interceptions thrown | 0 | 0 |
| Sacks taken | 1 | 9 |
| Yards lost on sacks | 6 | 55 |
| Passer rating | 90.1 | 58.7 |
Statistics reflect the supplied ESPN box score. Completion percentages are calculated from completions divided by attempts.
Bo Nix’s performance for Denver
Nix completed 19 of 30 passes for 174 yards and one touchdown. He did not throw an interception and took just one sack for a loss of six yards. His passer rating was 90.1.
These numbers show a quarterback who provided enough passing production to support a winning performance without needing an unusually high volume of explosive plays. Denver averaged 5.8 yards per passing attempt, compared with New York’s 2.6.
Nix’s most important contribution was the touchdown pass to tight end Nate Adkins. The 16-yard completion arrived at the end of the opening quarter and gave Denver a 10-6 lead. That score became especially important when the game developed into a defensive struggle.
His final yardage total was respectable rather than spectacular. He did not need to throw for 300 yards because Denver’s defense consistently disrupted New York’s offense and limited the Jets’ ability to answer the Broncos’ scoring drives.
There is also a useful distinction between quarterback efficiency and overall offensive dominance. Nix’s 174 gross passing yards did not mean Denver controlled every offensive phase. The Broncos averaged only 3.0 yards per rushing attempt, and their offense was held scoreless in the second and third quarters.
The more accurate assessment is that Nix avoided costly passing mistakes, produced the game’s only offensive touchdown, and helped Denver remain in position to win.
Justin Fields’ difficult afternoon
Fields completed nine of 17 passes for 45 gross passing yards, with no passing touchdowns and no interceptions. He recorded a 58.7 passer rating and took nine sacks for a combined loss of 55 yards.
His 2.6 yards per passing attempt highlights how difficult it was for New York to move the ball through the air. Even when Fields completed a pass, the offense often gained too little ground to create a sustainable drive.
The nine sacks were the defining statistic. They increased the distance New York needed to cover on subsequent plays, forced the offense into difficult down-and-distance situations, and reduced its ability to threaten Denver vertically.
It would be misleading, however, to assign every sack entirely to the quarterback. Sacks can result from several factors, including protection breakdowns, defensive wins, receiver routes that take time to develop, coverage, and a quarterback holding the ball. The box score establishes that Fields was sacked nine times, but it does not by itself establish the precise responsibility for each play.
Fields also contributed 31 rushing yards on seven attempts. That production showed that his mobility remained part of the Jets’ offensive approach, but it could not compensate for the passing game’s limitations.
Why the quarterback comparison matters
Three differences stand out:
- Passing volume: Denver attempted 30 passes, compared with 17 for New York.
- Passing efficiency: Nix averaged 5.8 yards per attempt, while Fields averaged 2.6.
- Protection: Denver allowed one sack, while the Jets allowed nine.
The third difference is particularly significant. A quarterback can struggle to complete passes when the opposing defense consistently breaks through the offensive line. In this game, Denver’s pass rush changed the conditions under which Fields had to operate.
Nix did not post an extraordinary statistical performance, but he had a far more manageable environment. That contrast helps explain why Denver could win despite gaining fewer rushing yards than the Jets.
Rushing Stats: J.K. Dobbins vs Breece Hall
The rushing comparison offers a different perspective on the contest. New York gained more total rushing yards and gave Breece Hall a heavier workload, but the Jets’ ground production was not enough to offset their passing problems.
Rushing statistics
| Rushing statistic | Denver Broncos | New York Jets |
| Team rushing attempts | 26 | 31 |
| Team rushing yards | 78 | 92 |
| Average yards per carry | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Leading rusher | J.K. Dobbins | Breece Hall |
| Leading rusher attempts | 14 | 22 |
| Leading rusher yards | 40 | 59 |
| Leading rusher average | 2.9 | 2.7 |
| Longest run by leading rusher | 8 yards | 8 yards |
| Rushing touchdowns by leading rusher | 0 | 0 |
J.K. Dobbins’ contribution
Dobbins carried the ball 14 times for 40 yards, averaging 2.9 yards per attempt. His longest run was eight yards, and he did not score a rushing touchdown.
His average indicates that Denver’s running game did not consistently generate substantial gains. However, evaluating a running back solely by average yards per carry can overlook important context, including defensive fronts, blocking, game situation, and the need to maintain balance in the offense.
Denver finished with 78 team rushing yards on 26 attempts. That was 14 fewer rushing yards than New York recorded.
Dobbins’ workload gave the Broncos a way to keep running the ball and avoid making the offense entirely dependent on Nix. Yet the limited average suggests the ground attack was not the primary reason Denver won.
The more important combination was a serviceable passing performance and an outstanding defensive effort.
Breece Hall’s performance
Hall led the Jets with 22 carries for 59 yards. He averaged 2.7 yards per attempt and recorded a longest run of eight yards, with no rushing touchdowns.
Hall had eight more rushing attempts and 19 more rushing yards than Dobbins. His workload suggests that New York continued to use its running game despite the difficulties in the passing attack.
The Jets accumulated 92 rushing yards on 31 attempts, matching Denver’s team average of 3.0 yards per carry when rounded to one decimal place. Hall was responsible for most of New York’s rushing attempts and provided a steady source of ground production.
However, his individual numbers also reveal a limitation. Although he carried the ball frequently, his average of 2.7 yards per attempt made it difficult to create repeated explosive gains.
The Jets needed the run game to help Fields by keeping the offense in manageable situations. But when the passing attack produced only 45 gross yards and the defense repeatedly sacked the quarterback, Hall’s work could not solve the team’s broader offensive problem.
Did New York win the rushing battle?
In terms of raw yardage, yes. The Jets gained 92 rushing yards to Denver’s 78. They also attempted five more runs.
That advantage did not automatically translate into superior offensive performance. The value of rushing production depends on whether it generates first downs, creates scoring opportunities, and complements the passing game.
New York’s overall offense gained very little through the air. Denver’s defense could therefore apply pressure to Fields without facing the same level of passing threat that a more productive offense might present.
The lesson from the rushing statistics is straightforward: a team can lead in rushing yards and still lose when its passing game cannot sustain drives.
Receiving Stats: Evan Engram, Nate Adkins and Josh Reynolds
The receiving numbers reveal how Denver created its only offensive touchdown and why New York’s passing attack failed to develop into a reliable scoring threat.
Leading receivers and touchdown contributors
| Player | Team | Receptions | Receiving yards | Yards per catch | Touchdowns |
| Evan Engram | Denver | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 0 |
| Nate Adkins | Denver | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 1 |
| Marvin Mims Jr. | Denver | 2 | 30 | 15.0 | 0 |
| Josh Reynolds | New York | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 0 |
| Garrett Wilson | New York | 3 | 13 | 4.3 | 0 |
The figures above use the individual receiving lines in the ESPN box score. The table highlights the leading performers and the main contrast between Denver’s touchdown production and New York’s limited gains.
Evan Engram’s reliable target production
Engram recorded five receptions on six targets for 42 yards. He averaged 8.4 yards per reception, with a longest catch of 16 yards.
His five catches were the most by a Denver receiver in the supplied statistics. That made him an important option for Nix, particularly in a game where Denver needed consistent completions rather than a high-risk passing approach.
Engram did not score a touchdown, but a receiver’s contribution cannot be judged by touchdowns alone. Receptions can help a team gain first downs, avoid negative plays, and maintain possession.
His 42 yards also made him Denver’s leading receiver by yardage among the players listed in the supplied box score, although Mims posted a higher yards-per-catch average.
Nate Adkins delivered the decisive touchdown
Adkins caught two passes for 23 yards and one touchdown. His 16-yard touchdown reception from Nix was the most important receiving play of the game.
The touchdown gave Denver a 10-6 lead with no time remaining in the first quarter. Because neither team scored in the second quarter, that early touchdown remained the only offensive touchdown throughout the contest.
Adkins’ production is an example of why a player’s impact cannot always be measured by total receptions or total receiving yards. Engram had more catches and more receiving yards, but Adkins scored the touchdown that provided Denver with its most substantial scoring advantage.
The touchdown also meant Denver could rely on field goals for the remainder of its scoring. Lutz’s fourth-quarter kick ultimately supplied the winning points.
Marvin Mims Jr. added receiving and return value
Mims caught two passes for 30 yards, averaging 15.0 yards per reception. His longest catch was 26 yards, making him one of Denver’s more productive options on a per-catch basis.
He also handled Denver’s kick returns, finishing with four returns for 104 yards and a 26.0-yard average. His longest kick return was 34 yards.
That combination matters because special teams can create favorable field position without requiring the offense to complete a long drive. While Mims did not score a receiving touchdown or a return touchdown, his work in both phases contributed to Denver’s overall field-position effort.
Josh Reynolds led New York’s receivers
Reynolds caught three passes for 25 yards on three targets. His average was 8.3 yards per reception, and his longest catch covered 11 yards.
He was New York’s leading receiver by yardage in the supplied statistics. However, 25 yards was a modest total for a team’s top receiver in a full game.
Garrett Wilson caught three passes for 13 yards on eight targets. His 4.3 yards per reception reflected the limited gains New York generated through the air.
The contrast between Wilson’s targets and production is worth noting. Eight targets represented a significant portion of Fields’ 17 passing attempts, but those opportunities produced only 13 receiving yards. The box score alone cannot tell us whether the main cause was coverage, route design, pressure, inaccurate throws, or a combination of factors.
Team receiving comparison
| Team receiving metric | Denver | New York |
| Receptions | 19 | 9 |
| Receiving yards | 174 | 45 |
| Average yards per reception | 9.2 | 5.0 |
| Receiving touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Longest reception | 26 yards | 11 yards |
| Targets | 26 | 16 |
Denver recorded 10 more receptions and 129 more receiving yards. It also produced the only passing touchdown.
This was one of the clearest indicators of the difference between the teams. New York’s rushing production was competitive, but its receiving game was unable to provide the same support.
Defensive Stats: Denver’s Nine Sacks Changed the Game
Denver’s defense was the most influential unit in the contest. The Broncos recorded nine sacks, seven tackles for loss, four passes defended, and 15 quarterback hits. New York managed one sack, three tackles for loss, two passes defended, and three quarterback hits.
Team defensive comparison
| Defensive statistic | Denver Broncos | New York Jets |
| Total tackles | 74 | 66 |
| Solo tackles | 43 | 34 |
| Team sacks | 9 | 1 |
| Tackles for loss | 7 | 3 |
| Passes defended | 4 | 2 |
| Quarterback hits | 15 | 3 |
| Defensive touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
These totals show Denver’s advantage in disrupting the opposing quarterback. The nine-sack performance was particularly significant because it limited New York to negative 10 net passing yards after accounting for sack yardage.
Why the nine sacks mattered
A sack does more than record a defensive statistic. It can turn a manageable second down into a difficult third down, push an offense out of field-goal range, interrupt a promising drive, and increase the likelihood of a punt.
Denver’s pressure repeatedly forced the Jets to operate under difficult conditions. Fields finished with 45 gross passing yards, but the 55 yards lost on sacks reduced New York’s net passing yardage to negative 10.
That distinction is essential when evaluating the Denver Broncos vs New York Jets match player stats. Looking only at gross passing yards would show that the Jets gained 45 yards through completed and attempted passing plays. Including sacks reveals that the passing game actually lost more yardage to defensive pressure than it generated.
Denver also recorded 15 quarterback hits, five times New York’s total of three. Quarterback hits do not all result in sacks, but the combined figures indicate that the Broncos consistently affected Fields in the pocket.
Which Denver defenders stood out?
The supplied defensive box score lists several Broncos with substantial contributions:
- Jonathon Cooper: Two sacks, five total tackles, and three quarterback hits.
- Justin Strnad: One and a half sacks, six total tackles, and two quarterback hits.
- Talanoa Hufanga: One sack, five total tackles, and two tackles for loss.
- Nik Bonitto: One and a half sacks, six total tackles, and two quarterback hits.
- Eyioma Uwazurike: One sack, three total tackles, and one tackle for loss.
- Zach Allen: One sack, three total tackles, one pass defended, and three quarterback hits.
These individual lines show that Denver’s pass rush was not the work of a single player. Several defenders contributed sacks or pressure, making it harder for the Jets to identify and neutralize one consistent threat.
Cooper’s two sacks and three quarterback hits illustrate the impact of individual pass-rush production. Strnad and Bonitto also recorded multiple sacks when half-sacks are included.
The overall result was a defensive performance that repeatedly disrupted New York’s offensive rhythm.
The Jets’ defense still had some positive moments
New York recorded 66 tackles and nine quarterback hits? No. The supplied box score lists three quarterback hits and one sack for the Jets, alongside three tackles for loss and two passes defended.
Although those numbers were well below Denver’s totals, the Jets held the Broncos scoreless in the second and third quarters. Their defense helped keep the game close enough for New York to take an 11-10 lead in the third quarter.
This is an important distinction: a team can perform reasonably well in one phase of a game and still lose because another phase fails. New York’s defense gave its offense a chance to win, but the offense could not sustain enough productive drives to protect the narrow lead.
Neither team recorded an interception or a defensive touchdown in the supplied box score. Denver’s advantage came primarily from sacks and pressure rather than takeaways.
Special Teams Stats: Wil Lutz and Nick Folk
Special teams played a major role in a game where touchdowns were rare. Both kickers converted every field-goal attempt, but Denver’s combination of one touchdown and two field goals proved just enough.
Kicking comparison
| Kicking statistic | Wil Lutz, Denver | Nick Folk, New York |
| Field goals made | 2 | 3 |
| Field goals attempted | 2 | 3 |
| Field-goal percentage | 100% | 100% |
| Longest field goal | 57 yards | 52 yards |
| Extra points made | 1 | 0 |
| Total kicking points | 7 | 9 |
Folk scored nine points on three successful field goals. Lutz scored seven points through two field goals and one extra point.
The difference is that Denver’s offense produced a touchdown, while New York did not score one. A touchdown followed by a successful extra point is worth seven points, giving Denver a scoring source that the Jets could not match.
Wil Lutz’s late field goal
Lutz converted a 57-yard field goal in the first quarter and a 27-yard field goal in the fourth. The latter put Denver ahead 13-11 with 5:06 remaining.
The kick was decisive because the Jets had taken an 11-10 lead in the third quarter. Denver needed to regain the advantage, and the successful field goal gave the Broncos a two-point cushion.
The 57-yard kick also demonstrated Lutz’s ability to convert from long range. In a low-scoring game, a successful long field goal can provide points without requiring an offense to reach the end zone.
Nick Folk kept New York close
Folk converted field goals from 52, 41, and 38 yards. His three successful kicks accounted for all nine of New York’s points.
Folk’s accuracy prevented the Jets from wasting their scoring opportunities. However, field goals alone were not enough to win. New York needed either an offensive touchdown or another scoring opportunity late in the game, and Denver’s defense kept it from finding one.
Return game and punting
| Special teams statistic | Denver | New York |
| Kick returns | 4 | 5 |
| Kick-return yards | 104 | 172 |
| Average kick-return yards | 26.0 | 34.4 |
| Longest kick return | 34 yards | 72 yards |
| Punt returns | 2 | 4 |
| Punt-return yards | 11 | 32 |
| Punts | 6 | 7 |
| Punting average | 48.5 yards | 50.7 yards |
Kene Nwangwu led the Jets’ kick-return effort with three returns for 113 yards and an average of 37.7 yards. His longest return was 72 yards, the longest kick return recorded by either team.
Mims returned four Denver kickoffs for 104 yards. Although Denver had fewer total kick-return yards, the Broncos made the decisive plays in the phases that directly affected the final score.
Denver punter Jeremy Crawshaw averaged 48.5 yards across six punts, while New York punter Austin McNamara averaged 50.7 yards across seven punts. New York also recorded three punts inside the 20-yard line, compared with one for Denver.
These numbers show that the Jets had some positive special teams production. Their longer kick returns and strong punting average helped with field position, but they could not overcome the difference in quarterback pressure and passing production.
Turnovers, Penalties and Field Position
The game was not defined by interceptions. Neither team recorded one, and each team lost one fumble according to the supplied ESPN statistics.
The Broncos recorded two team fumbles and lost one. New York’s displayed fumble summary lists one team fumble and no fumbles lost, although the supplied extracted team summary contains a discrepancy in its recovery totals. For that reason, the fumble figures should be interpreted cautiously rather than used to draw a firm conclusion about turnover advantage.
The Jets also recorded a safety after an offensive holding penalty against Denver guard Quinn Meinerz was enforced in the end zone. That play gave New York two points and briefly put the Jets ahead 11-10.
The safety illustrates how penalties can have an outsized effect in a low-scoring game. A holding penalty in the end zone can award the defense two points while also changing possession and field position.
Denver ultimately recovered from that setback by putting together the fourth-quarter drive that led to Lutz’s go-ahead field goal.
The game also shows why turnovers, penalties, and sacks should be examined together. An interception is an obvious possession-changing event, but a sack can end a drive, a penalty can create a safety, and poor field position can force a team to attempt a difficult scoring play. All three can influence a close result.
How Denver Won Despite Rushing for Fewer Yards
Denver’s 13-11 victory was not built on dominating every statistical category. The Broncos actually finished with fewer rushing yards and fewer kick-return yards than New York.
Their winning formula came from three areas.
1. Denver produced the only offensive touchdown
Adkins’ 16-yard touchdown reception provided seven points when combined with Lutz’s extra point. New York did not score an offensive touchdown, relying entirely on Folk’s three field goals and the safety.
That difference was critical. Denver’s touchdown created a scoring advantage that New York could not match through field goals alone.
2. Denver protected its quarterback better
Nix was sacked once, while Fields was sacked nine times. The 49-sack? No. The actual difference was eight additional sacks allowed by New York.
Those sacks reduced the Jets’ net passing production and made it harder for the offense to maintain possession. Denver’s defense consistently forced the Jets into difficult situations, limiting the opportunities available to build a late scoring drive.
3. Denver made the decisive fourth-quarter play
Lutz’s 27-yard field goal gave Denver a 13-11 lead. The Broncos then relied on their defense to preserve that advantage.
This sequence shows how offensive execution and defensive pressure complemented one another. Denver did not need a high-scoring performance. It needed a field goal when the opportunity arrived and a defense capable of preventing the Jets from answering.
What the Match Player Statistics Reveal
The most useful way to interpret this game is to separate individual production from team performance.
Nix’s passing line was better than Fields’ in yards, completion percentage, touchdown production, and passer rating. Dobbins gained fewer rushing yards than Hall, while Engram led Denver in receptions and receiving yards. Adkins delivered the only offensive touchdown.
Defensively, Denver’s nine sacks were the most important statistical difference. The pass rush limited New York’s passing production and created repeated negative plays.
New York’s performance was not without positives. Hall gained 59 rushing yards, Folk converted all three field goals, and Nwangwu provided a 72-yard kick return. The Jets’ defense also kept Denver scoreless during two consecutive quarters.
However, those contributions did not compensate for the lack of passing production. The Broncos won because their quarterback made enough plays, their offense scored a touchdown, and their defense consistently disrupted the opposing quarterback.
For readers comparing box scores, this game is a useful reminder that the most meaningful statistic is not always the highest number on the page. A long kick return, a productive running back, or a high number of tackles can be valuable, but the context of the score and the timing of key plays determine how those numbers affect the result.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Denver Broncos vs New York Jets game on October 12, 2025?
The Denver Broncos defeated the New York Jets 13-11 in Week 6 of the 2025 NFL regular season. The game took place at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium in London, England.
2. How many passing yards did Bo Nix record against the Jets?
Bo Nix completed 19 of 30 passes for 174 gross passing yards and one touchdown. He threw no interceptions and finished with a passer rating of 90.1.
3. How many sacks did the Broncos record against Justin Fields?
Denver recorded nine sacks against Justin Fields, costing the Jets 55 yards. The Broncos’ defense also recorded 15 quarterback hits, while New York’s defense managed one sack against Nix.
4. Who were the leading rushers in the game?
J.K. Dobbins led Denver with 40 rushing yards on 14 carries. Breece Hall led New York with 59 rushing yards on 22 carries. Neither player scored a rushing touchdown.
5. Who scored the only offensive touchdown?
Denver tight end Nate Adkins scored the only offensive touchdown, catching a 16-yard pass from Bo Nix at the end of the first quarter. Wil Lutz converted the extra point to give Denver a 10-6 lead.
6. Why did the Broncos win despite gaining fewer rushing yards?
Denver won because its passing game produced the only offensive touchdown and its defense recorded nine sacks. Although New York gained 92 rushing yards compared with Denver’s 78, the Jets managed only 45 gross passing yards and could not produce a touchdown.
Conclusion
The Denver Broncos‘ 13-11 victory over the New York Jets was a defensive battle decided by quarterback pressure, one important touchdown, and a successful late field goal. The final score was close, but the individual statistics reveal a clear difference in the teams’ ability to execute through the air.
Bo Nix completed 19 passes for 174 yards and a touchdown, while Justin Fields managed 45 passing yards and took nine sacks. J.K. Dobbins led Denver’s rushing attack, Breece Hall led New York, and Evan Engram provided the Broncos with their most productive receiving performance by catches and yards. Nate Adkins made the game’s decisive offensive contribution with his touchdown reception.
The defensive numbers were even more telling. Denver’s nine sacks and 15 quarterback hits repeatedly disrupted the Jets’ offense, while New York’s defense helped keep the contest competitive by holding Denver scoreless in the second and third quarters.
Special teams also influenced the result. Nick Folk made all three of his field goals for New York, while Wil Lutz converted two field goals and an extra point for Denver. His fourth-quarter field goal ultimately supplied the winning points.
Taken together, these performances explain why Denver prevailed despite recording fewer rushing yards and kick-return yards. The Broncos produced the more effective passing performance, generated sustained defensive pressure, and executed when the game was on the line.
