Los Angeles Rams vs Seahawks Match Player Stats

Los Angeles Rams vs Seattle Seahawks match player stats from the December 19, 2025, NFC West thriller tell a much more interesting story than the final score alone. Seattle defeated Los Angeles 38-37 in overtime at Lumen Field after overcoming a 16-point fourth-quarter deficit. Matthew Stafford produced 457 passing yards without an interception, while Puka Nacua delivered one of the biggest receiving performances of the season with 225 yards and two touchdowns. On the other side, Sam Darnold threw for 270 yards, two touchdowns and two interceptions, but Seattle’s rushing attack, special teams and late-game execution ultimately changed the result.

The game was a remarkable example of how football can be won without dominating every statistical category. The Rams finished with 581 total yards compared with Seattle’s 415, held the ball for more than 40 minutes and recorded 26 first downs. Yet the Seahawks produced 171 rushing yards, scored a punt-return touchdown, forced a fumble and converted crucial opportunities late in the contest.

The official NFL game records confirm the final result and provide the foundation for the statistical breakdown below.

Table of Contents

Los Angeles Rams vs Seattle Seahawks Match Player Stats at a Glance

The final score was Seattle Seahawks 38, Los Angeles Rams 37 in overtime.

Category	Los Angeles Rams	Seattle Seahawks
Final Score	37	38
Total Yards	581	415
Passing Yards	457	244 net
Rushing Yards	124	171
Offensive Plays	88	63
First Downs	26	22
Third Down	8/20	4/11
Fourth Down	2/3	0/0
Turnovers Lost	1	3
Sacks	0 allowed	4
Time of Possession	40:33	26:14
Touchdowns	4	5

One of the clearest statistical surprises is that Los Angeles generated 166 more total yards and ran 25 more offensive plays, yet lost the game. The Rams also gained 457 net passing yards, while Seattle managed only 244 net passing yards.

Seattle’s advantage came from efficiency in the areas that directly influenced scoring. The Seahawks averaged 6.8 yards per rushing attempt, compared with 3.2 for Los Angeles. Seattle also returned a punt 58 yards for a touchdown and scored five touchdowns overall.

The NFL’s official game book records these team-level differences, including the Rams’ 581 total yards, Seattle’s 171 rushing yards and the 40:33 to 26:14 time-of-possession split.

Matthew Stafford’s 457-Yard Passing Performance

Matthew Stafford was the statistical star of the Rams offense.

He completed 29 of 49 passes for 457 yards, three touchdowns and zero interceptions. His 9.3 yards per attempt showed that this was not simply a high-volume short passing performance. Stafford consistently pushed the football downfield.

His reported passer rating was 110.7, while his QBR was 89.6.

Those numbers become even more impressive when viewed alongside the workload. Stafford attempted 49 passes and completed 29, meaning the Rams relied heavily on his arm throughout the contest.

Stafford’s Passing Line

Completions: 29
Attempts: 49
Completion rate: 59.2%
Passing yards: 457
Yards per attempt: 9.3
Touchdowns: 3
Interceptions: 0
Sacks: 0
Passer rating: 110.7
QBR: 89.6
Longest team completion: 58 yards

The most important point is that Stafford did not lose the game through inefficient quarterback play. He protected the ball, produced explosive gains and consistently moved the Rams offense.

In fact, the Rams’ passing production was so strong that their 457 passing yards represented the majority of their 581 total yards.

This is an important lesson when evaluating quarterback statistics. A quarterback can produce an elite statistical performance and still finish on the losing side when other phases fail to close the game.

Puka Nacua Was the Offensive Standout

If one player deserves special attention when studying the Los Angeles Rams vs Seattle Seahawks match player stats, it is Puka Nacua.

Nacua finished with 12 receptions for 225 yards and two touchdowns on 16 targets.

That works out to an extraordinary 18.8 yards per reception.

Puka Nacua Receiving Stats

Receptions: 12
Targets: 16
Receiving yards: 225
Average: 18.8 yards per reception
Touchdowns: 2
Long reception: 58 yards

Nacua accounted for nearly half of Stafford’s passing production. His 225 yards represented approximately 49% of the Rams’ 457 receiving yards.

That level of concentration tells us something important about the Rams’ offensive approach. Seattle was unable to consistently prevent Stafford from finding his primary playmaker, even though the Seahawks eventually found enough ways to win.

Nacua’s combination of volume and explosiveness was especially notable. Twelve catches gave him a substantial possession role, while the 18.8-yard average demonstrated that he was not simply collecting short completions.

The 58-yard long gain also illustrates why his presence was so difficult to defend.

Rams Receiving Depth Beyond Nacua

While Nacua dominated the box score, the Rams received contributions from several other players.

Xavier Smith caught two passes for 57 yards, including a 48-yard gain. Konata Mumpfield added two receptions for 40 yards. Davis Allen caught two passes for 34 yards, while Terrance Ferguson recorded three catches for 33 yards and a touchdown.

Colby Parkinson finished with two receptions for 21 yards. Jordan Whittington had one reception for 19 yards. Kyren Williams contributed three catches for 15 yards, while Blake Corum added one catch for 13 yards.

The overall Rams receiving line was:

29 receptions
457 yards
15.8 yards per reception
3 touchdowns
48 targets

That 15.8-yard team average is a strong indication that Los Angeles was creating meaningful downfield opportunities.

Kyren Williams and the Rams Rushing Attack

The passing game carried most of the statistical workload, but the Rams still produced 124 rushing yards.

Kyren Williams led the team with 23 carries for 70 yards. He averaged 3.0 yards per carry and recorded a longest run of eight yards.

Blake Corum supplied 14 carries for 48 yards and scored one rushing touchdown. He averaged 3.4 yards per attempt, with a longest run of nine yards.

Matthew Stafford added six rushing yards on two attempts.

Rams Rushing Breakdown

Player	Carries	Yards	Average	TD	Long
Kyren Williams	23	70	3.0	0	8
Blake Corum	14	48	3.4	1	9
Matthew Stafford	2	6	3.0	0	4
Team	39	124	3.2	1	9

The important weakness was efficiency.

The Rams ran the ball 39 times but averaged only 3.2 yards per carry. Seattle, meanwhile, averaged 6.8 yards per rushing attempt.

That difference created a significant contrast in offensive efficiency. Los Angeles could move the ball through the air, but Seattle could generate larger gains on the ground with fewer rushing attempts.

Kenneth Walker III Changed the Rushing Equation

Kenneth Walker III produced one of Seattle’s most efficient performances.

He carried the ball 11 times for 100 yards and a touchdown.

That is an average of 9.1 yards per carry, with a 55-yard long run.

Kenneth Walker III Stats

Carries: 11
Rushing yards: 100
Yards per carry: 9.1
Rushing touchdowns: 1
Longest run: 55 yards
Receptions: 3
Receiving yards: 64
Receiving average: 21.3 yards

Walker also contributed 64 receiving yards on three catches.

That means he produced 164 yards from scrimmage, giving Seattle an explosive dual-threat element.

His 55-yard run was particularly important because it dramatically changed the efficiency profile of the Seahawks offense. Seattle did not need to run the ball 30 or 40 times to produce a major rushing impact.

Zach Charbonnet’s Crucial Contribution

Zach Charbonnet had nine rushing attempts for 32 yards and one touchdown.

His rushing average was 3.6 yards per carry, but his importance cannot be measured through rushing numbers alone.

Charbonnet also caught four passes for 22 yards.

Most importantly, he was involved in one of the game’s most unusual scoring moments.

A Seahawks two-point attempt that initially appeared unsuccessful was reviewed after the ball came loose. The play was determined to involve a backward pass, allowing Charbonnet to recover the ball in the end zone for two points. That conversion helped Seattle erase the Rams’ advantage.

The NFL’s account of the game identifies the overturned two-point play as one of the defining moments of Seattle’s comeback.

Sam Darnold’s Complicated but Resilient Performance

Sam Darnold’s statistical line is one of the most interesting parts of the game.

He completed 22 of 34 passes for 270 yards and two touchdowns. However, he also threw two interceptions and was sacked four times for 26 yards.

His reported passer rating was 84.2, with a QBR of 36.2.

Darnold’s Passing Line

Completions: 22
Attempts: 34
Completion rate: 64.7%
Passing yards: 270 gross
Net passing yards: 244
Yards per attempt: 7.9 gross
Touchdowns: 2
Interceptions: 2
Sacks: 4
Sack yards lost: 26
Passer rating: 84.2
QBR: 36.2

At first glance, those numbers appear much less impressive than Stafford’s.

Yet the context matters.

Darnold threw two interceptions and still led Seattle through one of the most dramatic comebacks of the season. He continued operating after mistakes and delivered the decisive overtime touchdown pass.

The official NFL recap described the comeback as a 16-point fourth-quarter turnaround, highlighting how Seattle recovered from a difficult stretch before ultimately winning.

This is a useful reminder that quarterback evaluation cannot always be reduced to passer rating.

Jaxon Smith-Njigba’s Role in the Passing Game

Jaxon Smith-Njigba led Seattle in receptions.

He caught eight passes for 96 yards and one touchdown on 13 targets.

His average was 12.0 yards per reception, with a longest catch of 27 yards.

Smith-Njigba Receiving Stats

Receptions: 8
Targets: 13
Yards: 96
Average: 12.0
Touchdowns: 1
Long: 27

His production was especially important because Seattle’s passing game did not generate the same volume as Los Angeles.

Smith-Njigba gave Darnold a reliable target throughout the game and ultimately caught the touchdown that brought Seattle level in overtime.

Seattle’s Other Receiving Contributors

Kenneth Walker III was not only productive as a runner.

His three receptions produced 64 yards, giving him an impressive 21.3-yard receiving average.

AJ Barner caught four passes for 49 yards and a touchdown. Cooper Kupp recorded three receptions for 39 yards. Zach Charbonnet added four catches for 22 yards.

The Seahawks finished with:

22 receptions
270 receiving yards
12.3 yards per reception
2 receiving touchdowns
31 targets

Seattle’s receiving production was considerably lower than Los Angeles’ 457 yards, but the Seahawks compensated with rushing efficiency and special teams impact.

Special Teams Were a Major Difference

One of the most important insights from the game is that special teams cannot be treated as an afterthought.

Rashid Shaheed returned a punt 58 yards for a touchdown.

That play provided Seattle with seven points and helped ignite the comeback.

Shaheed also produced a 31-yard rushing gain, giving him another explosive contribution.

The Rams, meanwhile, received solid kick-return production from Ronnie Rivers and Jordan Whittington. Rivers returned four kickoffs for 86 yards, while Whittington returned two for 41 yards.

Xavier Smith returned one punt for 31 yards.

The Rams also made three field goals through Harrison Mevis, who finished 3-for-4 on field-goal attempts and converted all four extra points for 13 total points.

Jason Myers made both of his extra-point attempts for Seattle.

The official NFL reporting identified Shaheed’s 58-yard punt-return touchdown as a major turning point in the comeback.

Defensive Statistics Tell Another Story

The Rams defense recorded four sacks and two interceptions.

Josh Wallace intercepted Darnold and returned it 56 yards. Kobie Turner also recorded an interception, returning it 10 yards.

Los Angeles finished with:

57 total tackles
33 solo tackles
4 sacks
3 tackles for loss
4 passes defended
7 quarterback hits
2 interceptions

Seattle’s defense recorded:

103 total tackles
44 solo tackles
0 sacks
2 tackles for loss
3 passes defended
4 quarterback hits
1 defensive touchdown

The defensive numbers reveal another unusual element of the contest.

The Rams generated more disruptive plays against the quarterback, yet Seattle still won.

This happened because the Seahawks defense did not need to dominate Stafford statistically. Instead, Seattle survived a huge passing performance and relied on other phases of the team to produce enough points.

Why the Rams Lost Despite 581 Total Yards

This is probably the most important analytical question surrounding the game.

The answer is efficiency and situational execution.

Los Angeles produced:

581 total yards
457 passing yards
124 rushing yards
26 first downs
40:33 time of possession
8-for-20 third-down conversion

Those are substantial numbers.

But Seattle produced more rushing efficiency, more touchdowns and the game’s only punt-return touchdown.

The Seahawks also avoided losing the turnover battle in the traditional sense? Not exactly. Seattle committed three turnovers, including two interceptions and a lost fumble, while Los Angeles had one lost fumble. That normally would strongly favor the Rams.

Yet Seattle still won.

That makes the victory even more unusual.

The Seahawks were able to overcome negative plays because their explosive gains and scoring opportunities arrived at critical moments.

The Fourth Quarter Was the Turning Point

Los Angeles entered the fourth quarter with a major advantage.

Seattle then transformed the game.

The Seahawks scored 16 fourth-quarter points while the Rams scored seven.

A 58-yard punt return touchdown from Shaheed immediately changed the momentum.

Seattle then added another touchdown and the controversial two-point recovery to tie the game at 30-30.

The Rams later regained control, but Seattle continued fighting.

The official NFL game center records the quarter-by-quarter scoring as Los Angeles 3, 10, 10, 7, 7 and Seattle 7, 0, 7, 16, 8.

That scoring pattern shows exactly why the game became a classic comeback rather than a routine Rams victory.

Overtime Decided Everything

Los Angeles received the first major opportunity in overtime.

The Rams drove 75 yards on 11 plays and scored a touchdown to move ahead 37-30.

At that stage, the game appeared to be slipping away from Seattle again.

Instead, Darnold responded.

Seattle marched 60 yards on 13 plays and finished the drive with a touchdown pass to Jaxon Smith-Njigba.

Seattle then converted the decisive two-point attempt, winning 38-37.

The official game center records the overtime drives as an 11-play, 75-yard Rams touchdown followed by a 13-play, 60-yard Seattle touchdown.

That sequence perfectly summarizes the game.

The Rams repeatedly produced strong offensive drives.

Seattle repeatedly found ways to answer.

Time of Possession Was Misleading

Los Angeles controlled the ball for 40 minutes and 33 seconds.

Seattle possessed it for only 26 minutes and 14 seconds.

Normally, that would be a major advantage for the team holding the football.

But possession alone does not determine efficiency.

Seattle generated 171 rushing yards on only 25 attempts. Los Angeles needed 39 rushing attempts to produce 124 yards.

That means Seattle averaged almost twice as many rushing yards per attempt.

The Rams also ran 88 offensive plays compared with Seattle’s 63.

In other words, Los Angeles had significantly more opportunities but could not turn those opportunities into enough separation on the scoreboard.

Third-Down and Fourth-Down Performance

The Rams converted 8 of 20 third downs, a 40% success rate.

Seattle converted only 4 of 11, or 36.4%.

Again, Los Angeles had the statistical edge.

The Rams also converted two of three fourth downs.

Seattle did not attempt a fourth down.

These figures reinforce how unusual the result was.

The Seahawks won despite trailing in several traditional possession and conversion measures.

That is why examining only first downs or third-down percentage can produce an incomplete interpretation of a football game.

Red-Zone Efficiency Mattered

Los Angeles reached the red zone six times and scored touchdowns on three occasions, producing a 50% red-zone touchdown rate.

Seattle reached the red zone three times and scored touchdowns on two occasions, producing a 67% rate.

The Rams therefore had more red-zone opportunities, but Seattle converted its opportunities at a higher rate.

In a one-point overtime game, those efficiency differences become meaningful.

What the Player Stats Say About Each Team

The statistical profiles of the two teams were very different.

Los Angeles Rams

The Rams were built around passing volume and explosive receiving production.

Stafford was highly productive.

Nacua was dominant.

The team accumulated huge passing numbers and controlled possession.

The problem was rushing efficiency and the inability to stop Seattle’s late surge.

Seattle Seahawks

Seattle was more balanced in terms of where its biggest plays came from.

Walker provided explosive rushing and receiving production.

Smith-Njigba produced consistently through the air.

Shaheed changed the game on special teams.

Darnold made mistakes but remained aggressive enough to lead the comeback.

The Seahawks did not need to win every statistical category. They needed to win the moments that determined the score.

Biggest Statistical Winners

Puka Nacua

Nacua’s 12-catch, 225-yard, two-touchdown performance was arguably the best individual offensive performance of the game.

Matthew Stafford

Stafford’s 457 passing yards, three touchdowns and zero interceptions made him statistically outstanding.

Kenneth Walker III

Walker produced 100 rushing yards on only 11 attempts and added 64 receiving yards.

Jaxon Smith-Njigba

His eight receptions, 96 yards and overtime touchdown made him a central part of Seattle’s comeback.

Rashid Shaheed

His 58-yard punt return touchdown provided one of the game’s biggest momentum swings.

Zach Charbonnet

His rushing touchdown and four receptions were useful, but his recovery of the backward-pass fumble for a two-point conversion was particularly significant.

Biggest Statistical Disappointments

Statistical disappointment does not necessarily mean poor individual play. It means the numbers did not translate into the desired team outcome.

For the Rams, the biggest issue was rushing efficiency.

Thirty-nine attempts for 124 yards sounds productive until the 3.2-yard average is considered.

For Seattle, Darnold’s two interceptions were significant mistakes. Four sacks also contributed to the offense’s lower net passing total.

Yet Seattle’s ability to recover from those errors ultimately mattered more than the errors themselves.

What This Game Teaches About NFL Player Stats

The most valuable lesson is that individual statistics need context.

Stafford threw for 457 yards and lost.

Darnold threw two interceptions and won.

The Rams had 581 total yards and lost.

Seattle had 415 total yards and won.

Los Angeles possessed the football for more than 40 minutes and lost.

Seattle had the ball for just over 26 minutes and won.

These contradictions are not flaws in the statistics. They are exactly why football analysis requires multiple layers.

A useful evaluation should examine:

Production
Efficiency
Explosive plays
Turnovers
Field position
Red-zone execution
Third-down performance
Special teams
Late-game execution
Situational football

When those elements are combined, the result becomes easier to understand.

Rams vs Seahawks Matchup: The Numbers That Matter Most

For readers comparing the teams, the most revealing numbers are not necessarily the largest ones.

The key figures are:

Rams passing yards: 457
Seahawks rushing yards: 171
Rams rushing average: 3.2
Seahawks rushing average: 6.8
Puka Nacua receiving yards: 225
Kenneth Walker III rushing yards: 100
Kenneth Walker III total yards from scrimmage: 164
Rams time of possession: 40:33
Seahawks time of possession: 26:14
Rams total yards: 581
Seahawks total yards: 415
Rams third-down rate: 40%
Seahawks third-down rate: 36.4%
Rams turnovers lost: 1
Seahawks turnovers lost: 3
Final margin: 1 point

The one-point margin is the ultimate reminder that football outcomes are often determined by a small number of high-impact plays.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the Rams and Seahawks?

The Seattle Seahawks defeated the Los Angeles Rams 38-37 in overtime on December 19, 2025.

How many passing yards did Matthew Stafford have?

Matthew Stafford completed 29 of 49 passes for 457 yards, three touchdowns and no interceptions.

How many receiving yards did Puka Nacua have?

Puka Nacua recorded 12 receptions for 225 yards and two touchdowns on 16 targets.

How did Sam Darnold perform?

Sam Darnold completed 22 of 34 passes for 270 yards, two touchdowns and two interceptions. He also lost 26 yards on four sacks.

Who led the Seahawks in rushing?

Kenneth Walker III led Seattle with 100 rushing yards on 11 carries, averaging 9.1 yards per carry and scoring one touchdown.

Why did Seattle win despite having fewer total yards?

Seattle overcame the yardage deficit through explosive rushing, special teams production, late-game scoring and situational execution. Rashid Shaheed’s 58-yard punt-return touchdown and the Seahawks’ overtime conversion were particularly important.

Conclusion

The Los Angeles Rams vs Seattle Seahawks match player stats from this overtime classic show why a box score should be analyzed rather than simply read.

Matthew Stafford delivered 457 passing yards without an interception. Puka Nacua produced 225 receiving yards and two touchdowns. The Rams generated 581 total yards and controlled possession for more than 40 minutes.

Yet Seattle found another path to victory.

Kenneth Walker III produced 100 rushing yards on only 11 carries. Jaxon Smith-Njigba delivered 96 receiving yards and the decisive overtime touchdown. Rashid Shaheed changed the momentum with a 58-yard punt-return touchdown. Sam Darnold overcame two interceptions to lead a comeback that erased a 16-point fourth-quarter deficit.

The final 38-37 score was therefore not a reflection of which team accumulated the most yards. It was a reflection of which team made enough high-impact plays when the game was at its most important.

That distinction is what makes this matchup such a valuable case study for understanding NFL player statistics.