Atlanta Hawks vs Lakers Match Player Stats

The atlanta hawks vs lakers match player stats from the January 2026 meeting tell a much deeper story than the final 141-116 score suggests. The Los Angeles Lakers controlled the game with elite shooting, strong rebounding, efficient scoring from their starting group, and outstanding playmaking from LeBron James and Luka Doncic. Atlanta produced several strong individual performances, particularly from Nickeil Alexander-Walker and CJ McCollum, but could not match Los Angeles’ efficiency across four quarters.

The game was played at Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles. The Lakers entered the matchup with a 24-14 record, while the Hawks were 20-22. Los Angeles ultimately finished with 141 points, compared with 116 for Atlanta. The Lakers shot 58% from the field and an impressive 56% from three-point range, while Atlanta shot 45% overall and 28% from beyond the arc.

For anyone studying this matchup through player production rather than simply looking at the final score, several details stand out. LeBron James came close to a triple-double, Luka Doncic delivered 27 points and 12 assists, Deandre Ayton dominated the glass with 18 rebounds, and Marcus Smart provided highly efficient two-way production. Atlanta had its own bright spots, with Nickeil Alexander-Walker scoring 26 points and CJ McCollum adding 25 from the bench.

Table of Contents

Atlanta Hawks vs Lakers Match Player Stats Overview

The Lakers won 141-116, but the scoreboard does not fully explain how the game developed.

Los Angeles established control early. The Lakers scored 37 points in the opening quarter and then exploded for 44 points in the second. That gave them an 81-60 halftime advantage. Atlanta scored 30 points in each of the first two quarters, which is normally enough offensive production to stay competitive, but Los Angeles was operating at a significantly higher level.

The Lakers eventually extended their advantage to 32 points early in the second half. Atlanta responded with a late push and reduced the margin, but Los Angeles regained control and finished the fourth quarter with 39 points. The official NBA game summary confirms the 141-116 final score and notes that Los Angeles used a 12-1 run after halftime to create separation.

Final Score by Quarter

Quarter	Atlanta Hawks	Los Angeles Lakers
1st	30	37
2nd	30	44
3rd	26	21
4th	30	39
Final	116	141

The most important number may be the second quarter. Atlanta was already six points behind after the first, but Los Angeles added another 44 points while the Hawks scored 30. That created an enormous halftime deficit.

Atlanta did win the third quarter 26-21, showing that the game was not simply a four-quarter collapse. However, the Lakers answered in the fourth and closed the contest convincingly.

Team Shooting Efficiency

The clearest statistical difference between the teams was shooting efficiency.

Atlanta finished 45-for-100 from the field, while Los Angeles went 48-for-83. That means the Hawks needed 17 more field-goal attempts to make three fewer shots.

The difference becomes even more significant from three-point range. Atlanta made 13 of 46 attempts, good for 28%. Los Angeles made 19 of 34, producing a remarkable 56%.

Team	FG	FG%	3PT	3PT%	FT	FT%
Hawks	45-100	45%	13-46	28%	13-18	72%
Lakers	48-83	58%	19-34	56%	26-30	87%

This was not simply a case of the Lakers taking more shots. They were converting at a much higher rate.

Los Angeles also benefited from superior free-throw efficiency. The Lakers made 26 of 30 free throws, while Atlanta converted 13 of 18.

The combined effect was devastating. Los Angeles produced 141 points while taking only 83 field-goal attempts. Atlanta needed 100 attempts to reach 116 points.

That shooting gap is one of the main reasons the game became a 25-point Lakers victory.

LeBron James Nearly Records a Triple-Double

LeBron James was the most complete player in the game.

He finished with:

31 points
9 rebounds
10 assists
12-of-20 shooting
2-of-4 from three-point range
5-of-6 from the free-throw line
1 steal
1 block
4 turnovers
Plus-17 rating

James needed only one additional rebound for a triple-double.

His 31 points came on 60% shooting from the field. More importantly, he was not simply scoring. His 10 assists helped organize an offense that produced 141 points.

The combination of scoring efficiency and playmaking made his performance especially valuable. Atlanta could not simply focus on stopping his scoring because James was also creating opportunities for teammates.

His plus-17 rating was strong, although several other Lakers posted even larger positive figures.

Luka Doncic Controls the Lakers Offense

Luka Doncic provided another major offensive engine for Los Angeles.

His line was:

27 points
5 rebounds
12 assists
7-of-16 field goals
5-of-9 three-pointers
8-of-10 free throws
1 block
7 turnovers
Plus-27

Doncic’s 12 assists were the highest total on either team.

His seven turnovers are worth mentioning because they represent the main weakness in an otherwise excellent offensive performance. However, the overall result remained extremely positive because his playmaking consistently generated high-value opportunities.

He also shot 5-for-9 from three-point range. That 55.6% conversion rate from deep put significant pressure on Atlanta’s defense.

The Lakers therefore had two elite playmakers operating together. James could create from multiple areas of the floor, while Doncic could control possessions through pick-and-rolls, isolation situations, passing angles, and perimeter shooting.

That combination made it difficult for Atlanta to maintain a stable defensive strategy.

Deandre Ayton Dominates the Rebounding Battle

Deandre Ayton delivered one of the most important interior performances of the game.

He scored 17 points and grabbed 18 rebounds in just over 30 minutes.

His shooting line was particularly efficient:

17 points
7-of-9 field goals
3-of-3 free throws
18 rebounds
1 assist
3 offensive rebounds
15 defensive rebounds
Plus-31

Ayton’s 18 rebounds were the most in the game.

The 15 defensive rebounds were especially important because they helped the Lakers end Atlanta possessions and prevent second opportunities.

Los Angeles finished with 47 total rebounds compared with 32 for Atlanta. That 15-rebound advantage is substantial.

Ayton also finished with a plus-31 rating, one of the best marks among all players who received meaningful minutes.

His performance shows why individual scoring totals alone do not explain this matchup. He scored the same 17 points as Jake LaRavia, but his rebounding impact significantly changed the possession battle.

Marcus Smart Provides Efficient Two-Way Production

Marcus Smart was another key contributor for Los Angeles.

He scored 16 points while shooting 4-of-5 from the field, 2-of-3 from three-point range, and 6-of-6 from the free-throw line.

He also recorded:

5 rebounds
4 assists
1 block
2 offensive rebounds
Plus-32

His plus-32 rating was the highest among the Lakers’ starters.

Smart’s efficiency stands out. He took only five field-goal attempts but scored 16 points because he converted almost everything available to him.

His perfect 6-for-6 free-throw shooting also helped maximize his offensive possessions.

Jake LaRavia Gives the Lakers Another Efficient Scorer

Jake LaRavia quietly produced an important performance.

He scored 17 points on 6-of-10 shooting and made 3 of his 4 three-point attempts.

His complete line included:

17 points
4 rebounds
3 assists
1 steal
3-of-4 from three
2-of-2 free throws
Plus-13

The 75% three-point shooting was especially useful because it added another perimeter threat alongside Doncic and Smart.

Atlanta could not afford to focus exclusively on Los Angeles’ biggest stars because several supporting players were also converting their opportunities.

Nickeil Alexander-Walker Leads Atlanta’s Scoring

Nickeil Alexander-Walker was Atlanta’s leading scorer.

He finished with 26 points on 10-of-16 shooting, including 5-of-9 from three-point range.

His final line included:

26 points
4 rebounds
3 assists
5-of-9 from three
1-of-1 from the free-throw line
No turnovers
Plus/minus of minus-37

The shooting efficiency was excellent. He made 62.5% of his field-goal attempts and 55.6% of his three-point attempts.

However, the minus-37 rating shows the difference between individual scoring success and team success.

Alexander-Walker was productive, but his production did not translate into enough defensive resistance or overall team control.

This is an important lesson when evaluating player statistics. A player can have a strong offensive game while his team still struggles significantly during his minutes.

CJ McCollum Provides Valuable Bench Scoring

CJ McCollum was one of Atlanta’s most important offensive contributors.

Coming off the bench, he scored 25 points in 27 minutes.

His numbers included:

25 points
11-of-23 field goals
2-of-8 three-pointers
1-of-3 free throws
1 rebound
3 assists
1 steal
2 turnovers
Plus-2

McCollum’s 11 made field goals were the most on the Hawks.

Although his three-point shooting was only 25%, he generated offense effectively inside the arc and gave Atlanta another reliable scoring option.

His plus-2 rating is also notable because it was dramatically better than several Atlanta starters.

That suggests the Hawks’ bench unit featuring McCollum was able to compete more effectively during certain stretches than the starting group.

Jalen Johnson’s All-Around Contribution

Jalen Johnson did not shoot efficiently, but he contributed in several areas.

He recorded:

13 points
3 rebounds
6 assists
1 steal
5-of-17 field goals
1-of-7 three-pointers
2-of-2 free throws
No turnovers

His six assists were tied with no other Atlanta player and helped maintain offensive movement.

The main issue was scoring efficiency. Johnson made only 5 of 17 field-goal attempts and 1 of 7 from three.

Against a Lakers team shooting 58% overall, Atlanta needed its primary creators to be more efficient.

Dyson Daniels Contributes Without High Scoring

Dyson Daniels scored only eight points, but his overall performance was more useful than his scoring total suggests.

He finished with:

8 points
8 rebounds
5 assists
2 steals
4-of-6 field goals
No turnovers

His two steals were tied for the Hawks’ team high, and he finished with the best plus/minus among Atlanta’s starters at minus-9.

Daniels also shot 66.7% from the field.

His performance demonstrates why box-score evaluation should include more than points. His rebounding, passing, steals, and ball security all helped Atlanta.

Onyeka Okongwu’s Interior Work

Onyeka Okongwu played 33 minutes and finished with seven points and eight rebounds.

He also recorded four assists and one block.

His shooting was less efficient, with 3 makes on 8 attempts and no made three-pointers in three attempts.

Still, the eight rebounds and four assists gave Atlanta useful interior and connective play.

The problem was that Los Angeles’ frontcourt produced more overall value, particularly through Ayton’s 18 rebounds.

Corey Kispert Adds Perimeter Scoring

Corey Kispert scored 19 points in 26 minutes.

He made:

6-of-11 field goals
3-of-7 three-pointers
4-of-6 free throws

His 54.5% field-goal shooting and 42.9% three-point shooting were positive offensive contributions.

However, he did not record a rebound and had two turnovers.

His scoring helped keep Atlanta’s offense productive, but the Hawks still lacked the defensive consistency needed to slow the Lakers.

Mouhamed Gueye’s Defensive Impact

Mouhamed Gueye did not score much, but he produced an unusual statistical line.

He scored five points and collected four rebounds, one assist, and five steals.

The five steals were the most by any player in the game.

He also finished with a plus-4 rating, the best figure among Atlanta players who played meaningful minutes.

That is a significant contrast to the final team result.

Gueye’s performance illustrates how a player can provide meaningful defensive value even when his scoring contribution is modest.

The Rebounding Battle Decided More Than It Appears

The Lakers finished with 47 rebounds compared with 32 for Atlanta.

That is a 15-rebound advantage.

The breakdown was:

Rebounding Category	Hawks	Lakers
Offensive Rebounds	12	10
Defensive Rebounds	20	37
Total Rebounds	32	47

The biggest difference was defensive rebounding.

Los Angeles collected 37 defensive rebounds, while Atlanta had only 20.

This allowed the Lakers to finish defensive possessions more consistently.

Atlanta actually had two more offensive rebounds than Los Angeles, but that advantage was not enough to offset the Lakers’ dominance on the defensive glass.

Ayton’s 15 defensive rebounds were particularly important.

Assist Battle Favors Los Angeles

The Lakers also had a clear advantage in assists.

Los Angeles recorded 36 assists, while Atlanta finished with 30.

Both teams moved the ball reasonably well, but the Lakers generated more scoring efficiency from those possessions.

LeBron recorded 10 assists.

Doncic recorded 12.

Together, the two Lakers stars accounted for 22 assists.

That means most of the Lakers’ offensive structure was being directed by two elite creators.

Atlanta’s best individual assist totals were six from Jalen Johnson, five from Dyson Daniels, and four each from Onyeka Okongwu and Vit Krejci.

The difference in high-level playmaking was therefore substantial.

Turnovers Tell a More Complicated Story

Atlanta committed only six turnovers.

Los Angeles committed 14.

At first glance, that appears to favor the Hawks significantly.

However, Atlanta did not turn that advantage into enough scoring pressure.

The Lakers had 23 fast-break points compared with 16 for Atlanta, according to the official game summary. Both teams scored 56 points in the paint.

The Lakers therefore compensated for their higher turnover count through superior shooting, rebounding, transition scoring, and overall offensive efficiency.

This is a useful reminder that turnover totals should never be evaluated in isolation.

Three-Point Shooting Created the Separation

The biggest statistical difference was perimeter efficiency.

Atlanta attempted 46 three-pointers and made 13.

Los Angeles attempted 34 and made 19.

The Lakers therefore made six more three-pointers while taking 12 fewer attempts.

That is a major efficiency advantage.

Atlanta’s 28% three-point rate meant many possessions ended without efficient perimeter scoring. Los Angeles, meanwhile, converted 56% of its attempts from deep.

Doncic made five threes.

Alexander-Walker also made five.

LaRavia made three.

Smart made two.

Gabe Vincent made three off the bench.

The Lakers therefore received perimeter production from multiple positions rather than relying on a single shooter.

Free Throws Also Favored Los Angeles

Los Angeles made 26 of 30 free throws.

Atlanta made 13 of 18.

The Lakers therefore scored 13 more points at the free-throw line.

LeBron went 5-of-6.

Doncic went 8-of-10.

Smart was perfect at 6-of-6.

LaRavia was perfect at 2-of-2.

Ayton was perfect at 3-of-3.

That level of free-throw efficiency helped the Lakers turn their offensive opportunities into points.

Bench Production and Depth

The Lakers received several useful contributions from their bench.

Gabe Vincent scored 10 points and made 3 of 5 three-point attempts.

Nick Smith Jr. scored six points in only four minutes, making both of his field-goal attempts and both of his three-point attempts.

Kobe Bufkin scored three points in four minutes.

Drew Timme added two points.

Rui Hachimura scored seven points in his return from a seven-game absence and was playing under a minutes restriction, according to the official game recap.

Atlanta also received meaningful scoring from its reserves.

McCollum scored 25.

Kispert scored 19.

Gueye added five.

Wallace scored two.

The difference was not necessarily that Atlanta had no bench scoring. Rather, Los Angeles combined bench production with much more efficient starting-unit production.

Plus/Minus Shows the Lakers’ Control

The plus/minus statistics provide another useful way to understand the game.

For Los Angeles:

Marcus Smart: +32
Deandre Ayton: +31
Luka Doncic: +27
LeBron James: +17
Jake LaRavia: +13

For Atlanta:

Mouhamed Gueye: +4
CJ McCollum: +2
Keaton Wallace: 0
Several rotation players finished in negative territory

Nickeil Alexander-Walker recorded minus-37 despite scoring 26 points.

This does not mean he played poorly in every possession. It means Atlanta was outscored by a large margin during his minutes.

Plus/minus is most useful when combined with other statistics rather than treated as a standalone evaluation.

What the Game Reveals About Both Teams

The matchup provides several broader basketball lessons.

Los Angeles Had Multiple Reliable Offensive Engines

The Lakers did not rely on one player.

James scored 31.

Doncic scored 27.

Ayton scored 17.

LaRavia scored 17.

Smart scored 16.

Vincent added 10.

That distribution made the offense difficult to defend.

Atlanta Had Scoring, But Not Enough Efficiency

The Hawks had four players score at least 19 points when combining Alexander-Walker, McCollum, Kispert, and Johnson’s contributions.

Yet Atlanta still scored only 116.

The problem was efficiency.

A team can produce several double-digit scorers and still lose comfortably when its shooting percentages are substantially below its opponent’s.

The Lakers Won the Possession Battle in Important Areas

Los Angeles controlled defensive rebounds.

The Lakers made more three-pointers.

They made more free throws.
They shot a much higher percentage overall.
They also generated more assists.

Those advantages outweighed their 14 turnovers.

Season Series Context

The result tied the season series at 1-1.

The previous meeting was a 122-102 Lakers victory on November 9 according to the supplied matchup information.

That means Los Angeles won both meetings referenced in the supplied data by double-digit margins.

The January game, however, was considerably higher scoring, with both teams exceeding 100 points and the Lakers reaching 141.

The difference in offensive tempo and shooting efficiency made the January contest a much more productive scoring game.

Key Statistical Takeaways

The most important figures from the game can be summarized quickly.

Category	Hawks	Lakers	Advantage
Points	116	141	Lakers
Field Goal %	45%	58%	Lakers
Three-Point %	28%	56%	Lakers
Free Throw %	72%	87%	Lakers
Rebounds	32	47	Lakers
Assists	30	36	Lakers
Turnovers	6	14	Hawks
Steals	11	2	Hawks
Blocks	1	3	Lakers
Offensive Rebounds	12	10	Hawks
Defensive Rebounds	20	37	Lakers

The Hawks won the turnover and steals categories.

They also grabbed slightly more offensive rebounds.

But Los Angeles dominated the categories that directly influenced shooting efficiency and possession value.

Five Players Who Defined the Game

1. LeBron James

His 31 points, 10 assists, and nine rebounds made him the most complete performer.

2. Luka Doncic

His 27 points and 12 assists gave the Lakers another elite offensive creator.

3. Deandre Ayton

His 18 rebounds changed the interior battle and helped Los Angeles control the glass.

4. Nickeil Alexander-Walker

His 26 points on 10-of-16 shooting made him Atlanta’s leading scorer.

5. CJ McCollum

His 25 points provided valuable bench offense and helped Atlanta remain competitive during portions of the game.

Why the Final Score Was So Large

The 25-point margin was created by several advantages working together.

First, Los Angeles shot 58% compared with Atlanta’s 45%.

Second, the Lakers made 19 three-pointers compared with Atlanta’s 13.

Third, Los Angeles made 26 free throws compared with 13.

Fourth, the Lakers controlled defensive rebounding.

Fifth, Los Angeles had two elite playmakers combining for 22 assists.

Any one of these factors could influence a game. Having all of them working in the same direction produced a decisive result.

Atlanta did enough offensively to score 116 points, but the Lakers simply generated points at a much higher rate.

How to Read These Player Statistics Correctly

When evaluating a game like this, it is easy to focus only on the highest scoring players.

That approach misses important details.

A better process is to examine five areas:

Scoring efficiency: Look at field-goal and three-point percentages rather than points alone.
Playmaking: Check assists and turnovers together.
Rebounding: Separate offensive rebounds from defensive rebounds.
Defensive activity: Consider steals, blocks, and overall plus/minus.
Possession efficiency: Examine how effectively each team converts its opportunities.

Using this framework explains why Ayton’s 18 rebounds, Smart’s 4-of-5 shooting, Daniels’ zero turnovers, Gueye’s five steals, and Doncic’s 12 assists all matter even though their roles were very different.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Atlanta Hawks and Lakers game?

The Los Angeles Lakers defeated the Atlanta Hawks 141-116. The game was played at Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles.

Who led the Lakers in scoring?

LeBron James led Los Angeles with 31 points. He also recorded 10 assists and nine rebounds, narrowly missing a triple-double.

Who led the Hawks in scoring?

Nickeil Alexander-Walker led Atlanta with 26 points on 10-of-16 shooting, including five made three-pointers.

How many rebounds did Deandre Ayton have?

Deandre Ayton recorded 18 rebounds, including 15 defensive rebounds and three offensive rebounds. He also scored 17 points.

How many assists did Luka Doncic have?

Luka Doncic recorded 12 assists along with 27 points and five rebounds.

What was the biggest statistical difference between the teams?

The biggest difference was shooting efficiency. Los Angeles shot 58% from the field and 56% from three-point range, while Atlanta shot 45% overall and 28% from three.

Conclusion

The atlanta hawks vs lakers match player stats show that Los Angeles won through efficiency, balance, and control of the most valuable statistical areas.

LeBron James delivered an outstanding all-around performance with 31 points, 10 assists, and nine rebounds. Luka Doncic added 27 points and 12 assists, giving the Lakers two elite playmakers in the same lineup. Deandre Ayton controlled the boards with 18 rebounds, while Marcus Smart and Jake LaRavia added highly efficient scoring.

Atlanta had several impressive individual performances. Nickeil Alexander-Walker scored 26 points on efficient shooting, CJ McCollum added 25 points from the bench, Corey Kispert scored 19, and Dyson Daniels contributed eight points, eight rebounds, five assists, and two steals without committing a turnover.

However, the team statistics explain the final result. Los Angeles shot 58% from the field compared with Atlanta’s 45%, made 19 three-pointers compared with 13, converted 87% of its free throws, and won the rebounding battle 47-32.

The Hawks did force 11 steals and committed only six turnovers, but those advantages were not enough to overcome the Lakers’ shooting efficiency and rebounding dominance.

Ultimately, the 141-116 result was not produced by one isolated performance. It came from the Lakers combining elite playmaking, efficient perimeter shooting, interior rebounding, and contributions across the rotation. That combination made this matchup a strong example of why complete box-score analysis provides a clearer picture than the final score alone.