Miami Heat vs Toronto Raptors Match Player Stats

The miami heat vs toronto raptors match player stats from the April 9, 2026 meeting at Scotiabank Arena tell a clear story about how Toronto controlled the game. The Raptors defeated the Heat 128-114 after building an early advantage and maintaining enough control to survive Miami’s strong third quarter. Brandon Ingram led Toronto with 38 points, while Bam Adebayo produced an all-around performance for Miami with 24 points, 11 rebounds, and 8 assists.

The game was important for both teams because the Eastern Conference standings were tightly packed late in the regular season. Toronto entered the contest at 45-35, while Miami was 41-39. Toronto also completed a season sweep over Miami with the victory. The official NBA game record confirms the 128-114 final score, the quarter-by-quarter scoring, and Ingram’s 38-point performance. NBA official game record

This matchup was more than a simple difference in final points. Toronto won because it combined efficient scoring, strong free-throw shooting, better ball security, and several valuable contributions from its supporting players. Miami actually shot 56% from the field, which is excellent, but Toronto created more possessions and made far more free throws.

Miami Heat vs Toronto Raptors Match Player Stats

The headline numbers immediately show why Toronto came away with the win.

Team	Miami Heat	Toronto Raptors
Final Score	114	128
Field Goals	46-82	44-86
Field Goal %	56%	51%
Three-Pointers	14-35	13-30
Three-Point %	40%	43%
Free Throws	8-14	27-34
Free Throw %	57%	79%
Rebounds	34	40
Assists	35	24
Turnovers	13	4
Steals	1	9
Blocks	3	2
Offensive Rebounds	6	10
Personal Fouls	25	15

The first surprising number is Miami’s 56% field-goal shooting. Normally, shooting that efficiently gives a team a strong chance to win.

However, Toronto found other ways to create an advantage.

The Raptors had six more rebounds, four more offensive rebounds, nine more steals, and nine fewer turnovers. Toronto also attempted 34 free throws compared with Miami’s 14.

That difference produced a major advantage at the foul line.

Toronto scored 27 points from free throws. Miami scored only 8. That is a 19-point difference from the charity stripe alone.

This is one of the most important lessons from the miami heat vs toronto raptors match player stats. A team does not always need better field-goal efficiency to win. Possession control, pressure, rebounding, and free throws can completely change the outcome.

Final Score and Game Summary

Toronto won 128-114, producing a 14-point margin.

The scoring pattern was important because the Raptors did not rely on one late run. They established control early.

Quarter	Miami	Toronto
First	26	32
Second	24	37
Third	40	33
Fourth	24	26
Total	114	128

Toronto outscored Miami in the first, second, and fourth quarters.

The biggest difference came before halftime.

Toronto scored 69 points in the first half, while Miami scored 50. That 19-point halftime advantage created a difficult situation for the Heat.

Miami responded strongly in the third quarter.

The Heat scored 40 points in the third, their best offensive quarter of the game. Toronto still scored 33, meaning Miami reduced the deficit by only seven points.

That distinction matters.

A 40-point quarter sounds dominant, but Toronto was already in control. The Raptors continued scoring efficiently enough to prevent Miami from turning the game into a one-possession contest.

Toronto then outscored Miami 26-24 in the fourth quarter and closed the game without allowing a major comeback.

Brandon Ingram Leads Toronto With 38 Points

Brandon Ingram was the clear scoring leader.

He finished with:

• 38 points
• 13-of-23 field goals
• 2-of-3 three-pointers
• 10-of-11 free throws
• 7 rebounds
• 7 assists
• 1 steal
• 1 turnover
• Plus-13 plus/minus
• 37 minutes

The 38 points were especially significant because they matched his season high and represented his highest scoring total as a Raptor at that point.

His shooting profile was also impressive.

Ingram did not need excessive three-point volume to reach 38 points. He scored efficiently inside the three-point line, converted 10 of 11 free throws, and added two made threes.

His seven assists also show that his impact was not limited to scoring.

Toronto needed a primary creator who could attack scoring opportunities while also helping teammates. Ingram provided both.

Why Ingram’s Free Throws Mattered

The free-throw line was one of the defining areas of the game.

Ingram alone made 10 free throws on 11 attempts.

Miami’s entire team made only 8 free throws.

That comparison is remarkable.

Ingram therefore made two more free throws than the entire Heat roster.

His ability to draw contact and convert at the line helped Toronto maintain its scoring pace even when Miami was shooting the ball efficiently.

RJ Barrett Provides a Strong Secondary Performance

RJ Barrett finished with 22 points, 6 rebounds, 3 assists, and 2 steals.

His shooting line was:

• 6-of-15 from the field
• 1-of-5 from three
• 9-of-10 from the free-throw line

Barrett’s overall field-goal percentage was not spectacular, but his free-throw shooting helped compensate.

He made nine of ten free throws.

That gave Toronto another reliable source of points without requiring a large number of field-goal attempts.

His plus-14 rating was also the best among Toronto’s starting group listed in the supplied data.

Barrett also recorded two steals without committing a turnover.

That combination shows why box-score analysis should go beyond points.

A player can have an important impact through defensive activity, ball security, rebounding, and free-throw generation.

Collin Murray-Boyles Changes the Game From the Bench

One of the most efficient performances came from Collin Murray-Boyles.

He scored 17 points while going 7-for-7 from the field.

He also added:

• 8 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 2 steals
• 1 block
• 3 offensive rebounds
• 5 defensive rebounds
• 1 turnover
• Plus-21

His perfect shooting performance deserves special attention.

Murray-Boyles did not miss a field-goal attempt. He also made all three of his free throws.

That gave Toronto an efficient scoring boost from the bench.

His eight rebounds were equally valuable. Three came on the offensive glass, giving Toronto additional opportunities.

The plus-21 rating was the strongest among the Toronto players listed in the supplied box-score data.

That makes his performance one of the most important supporting stories in the game.

Scottie Barnes Adds Efficient Scoring

Scottie Barnes finished with 13 points, 4 rebounds, and 2 assists.

He shot 4-of-6 from the field and made both of his three-point attempts.

He also converted 3-of-4 free throws.

His shooting efficiency was excellent.

Barnes did not need a large number of attempts to contribute. Instead, he made the opportunities available to him count.

He finished with a plus-4 rating and committed no turnovers.

For a team already receiving major scoring from Ingram and Barrett, that type of efficient supporting performance is valuable.

Immanuel Quickley and Toronto’s Backcourt

Immanuel Quickley scored 11 points and added four assists.

He shot 4-of-10 overall and 3-of-7 from three-point range.

His three made three-pointers provided useful spacing around Toronto’s primary scorers.

Quickley also had:

• 3 rebounds
• 1 steal
• 1 offensive rebound
• 2 defensive rebounds
• 0 turnovers
• Plus-12

The zero-turnover performance stands out.

Toronto finished the game with only four turnovers as a team. Quickley’s ability to handle the ball without giving away possessions supported that overall efficiency.

Bam Adebayo’s All-Around Performance

Bam Adebayo was Miami’s most complete performer.

He recorded:

• 24 points
• 11 rebounds
• 8 assists
• 9-of-14 field goals
• 2-of-4 three-pointers
• 4-of-5 free throws
• 1 steal
• 1 block
• 1 turnover
• 4 offensive rebounds
• 7 defensive rebounds
• 37 minutes

Adebayo was highly efficient from the floor.

He made nine of his fourteen attempts and also contributed heavily as a rebounder and passer.

His eight assists were particularly important because they show how much Miami relied on him as an offensive hub.

He was only two assists away from a triple-double.

However, his strong individual performance was not enough to overcome Toronto’s team-level advantages.

This is another important point when reading miami heat vs toronto raptors match player stats. Individual excellence does not always translate into a team victory.

Adebayo produced one of Miami’s best overall stat lines, but Toronto had more players contributing to the winning formula.

Davion Mitchell Controls the Ball for Miami

Davion Mitchell scored 15 points and delivered 11 assists.

He shot 7-of-9 from the field.

That was an excellent shooting performance.

His 11 assists were also the most among the players listed for Miami.

However, Mitchell committed three turnovers.

That did not erase his offensive contribution, but it mattered because Toronto finished with only four turnovers as a team.

Miami had 13.

That nine-turnover difference gave Toronto considerably more control over possessions.

Mitchell’s performance therefore shows both sides of the box score. He was efficient and productive as a scorer and passer, but Toronto’s defensive pressure created a larger overall possession advantage.

Tyler Herro’s Shooting Contribution

Tyler Herro scored 15 points in 28 minutes.

He shot:

• 6-of-12 from the field
• 3-of-5 from three
• 4 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 1 turnover

His 50% field-goal shooting and 60% three-point shooting were solid.

Herro helped Miami space the floor, particularly during the third-quarter comeback attempt.

However, Miami needed more consistent production across the entire game.

The Heat’s third-quarter offense showed what was possible when the outside shots started falling. The problem was that Toronto had already created too much separation.

Jaime Jaquez Jr. Gives Miami Another 15 Points

Jaime Jaquez Jr. also scored 15 points.

He was highly efficient, shooting 6-of-9 from the field and 3-of-5 from three.

That was one of Miami’s better shooting performances.

He also added four assists.

However, his plus-minus was minus-31, the lowest among the listed Miami players.

Plus-minus should never be treated as a complete individual evaluation. It reflects what happened while a player was on the floor and depends heavily on lineup combinations and game context.

Still, the number is useful when considered alongside the overall result.

Miami was unable to consistently close the gap during Jaquez’s minutes.

Pelle Larsson’s Role

Pelle Larsson played 32 minutes and scored 10 points.

He shot 4-of-10 from the field and 2-of-5 from three.

He also contributed four rebounds and two assists.

His 32 minutes indicate that Miami trusted him with a meaningful role.

However, he finished with a minus-21 rating.

The number does not mean that his entire performance was poor. It does indicate that Toronto controlled the game significantly during his minutes.

Andrew Wiggins Has a Positive Plus-Minus

Andrew Wiggins had a quieter offensive night.

He scored five points on 2-of-6 shooting.

He also had:

• 1 rebound
• 2 assists
• 1 block
• 1 turnover
• Plus-6

His plus-6 rating was notable because Miami lost by 14 points.

This is a good example of why plus-minus should be viewed as supporting information rather than a simple player ranking.

Wiggins did not produce a large scoring total, but Miami performed relatively better during his minutes.

Miami’s Bench Contributions

Miami received useful production from several bench players.

Keshad Johnson scored six points on a perfect 3-of-3 shooting performance.

Kel’el Ware added seven points, four rebounds, one assist, and one block.

Norman Powell scored seven points while making three of five free throws.

The supplied data also shows that several reserve players received limited minutes.

The problem was not simply a lack of bench scoring.

Instead, Toronto’s overall efficiency and possession control made it difficult for Miami’s bench contributions to change the game’s direction.

Toronto’s Bench Depth Makes a Difference

Toronto received meaningful production beyond its starters.

Murray-Boyles was the biggest example with 17 points and eight rebounds.

Jamal Shead added eight points and three assists while making two of three three-point attempts.

Ja’Kobe Walter scored seven points and made two three-pointers.

These contributions helped Toronto avoid becoming overly dependent on Ingram and Barrett.

That balance matters late in the regular season.

When a team has several reliable scoring options, opponents have fewer opportunities to focus their defensive attention on one player.

Shooting Efficiency vs Winning Efficiency

At first glance, Miami’s 56% field-goal percentage looks like the most impressive team number.

Toronto shot only 51%.

So why did Toronto win by 14?

The answer is that field-goal percentage represents only one part of offensive efficiency.

Toronto gained advantages in several other areas.

Free Throws

Toronto made 27 free throws.

Miami made only 8.

That is a 19-point advantage.

Turnovers

Toronto committed only four turnovers.

Miami committed 13.

That gave Toronto nine additional possessions without considering other possession factors.

Offensive Rebounding

Toronto grabbed 10 offensive rebounds.

Miami grabbed six.

Those extra rebounds can create second-chance scoring opportunities.

Steals

Toronto recorded nine steals.

Miami recorded only one.

The Raptors therefore created more defensive disruptions.

Total Rebounding

Toronto had 40 rebounds.

Miami had 34.

The six-rebound advantage reinforced Toronto’s control over possessions.

Why Miami’s 56% Shooting Was Not Enough

Miami’s 46 made field goals came from 82 attempts.

Toronto made 44 field goals from 86 attempts.

That means Miami made two more field goals despite taking four fewer attempts.

Normally, that would be encouraging.

But the Heat did not get enough value from other scoring opportunities.

The free-throw difference was massive.

Miami also turned the ball over more than three times as often as Toronto.

This is why simply looking at field-goal percentage can produce an incomplete interpretation of a basketball game.

A better approach is to examine how teams generate and protect possessions.

Toronto did that more effectively.

The Third Quarter Was Miami’s Best Opportunity

Miami scored 40 points in the third quarter.

That was the Heat’s strongest period.

They also made nine three-pointers during the quarter, helping them reduce Toronto’s advantage.

But Toronto did not collapse.

Ingram continued producing, and Toronto entered the fourth quarter with a 102-90 lead.

That meant Miami had to erase a 12-point deficit over the final 12 minutes.

Toronto instead won the fourth quarter 26-24.

The Raptors therefore prevented the Heat from completing the comeback.

This sequence is important because it shows that Miami had enough offensive ability to challenge Toronto.

The bigger problem was the slow start and large halftime deficit.

First-Half Control Decided the Match

Toronto scored 69 first-half points.

Miami scored 50.

That 19-point difference became the foundation of the final result.

Toronto’s second quarter was especially important.

The Raptors scored 37 points compared with Miami’s 24.

A 13-point advantage in a single quarter gave Toronto a significant cushion.

The game then became a matter of protecting that advantage.

Miami improved after halftime, but the deficit was too large.

Ball Security Was One of Toronto’s Biggest Advantages

Toronto committed only four turnovers.

That is an excellent number over a full NBA game.

Miami committed 13.

The difference was nine turnovers.

Turnovers are especially damaging because they can remove scoring opportunities without allowing a shot attempt.

Toronto’s low turnover total also helped explain why the Raptors could win despite making two fewer field goals.

They were more careful with possessions.

Quickley, Barrett, Barnes, Shead, and several other Toronto players recorded zero turnovers in the supplied statistics.

That kind of collective ball security is difficult for an opponent to overcome.

Free-Throw Attempts Tell Another Story

Toronto attempted 34 free throws.

Miami attempted 14.

That means Toronto attempted 20 more free throws.

The difference cannot be explained simply by field-goal shooting.

It points toward Toronto creating more situations where defenders had to react physically.

Ingram and Barrett were especially important.

Ingram made 10 of 11.

Barrett made 9 of 10.

Together, those two players made 19 free throws.

That is more than double Miami’s total team free throws made.

The Season Series Was a Complete Toronto Sweep

Toronto won all four meetings with Miami during the season.

That gives the season series a stronger meaning than one isolated result.

The Raptors repeatedly found ways to beat the Heat.

In this final meeting, the winning formula included scoring balance, free-throw production, rebounding, defensive pressure, and ball security.

The sweep also gave Toronto confidence as the team approached the postseason race.

What the Plus-Minus Numbers Tell Us

Plus-minus should be interpreted carefully.

For Toronto, the strongest listed figures included:

• Collin Murray-Boyles: +21
• Ja’Kobe Walter: +18
• RJ Barrett: +14
• Brandon Ingram: +13
• Immanuel Quickley: +12

For Miami, Andrew Wiggins had the best listed figure at +6.

Keshad Johnson was +11 despite playing only 11 minutes.

Those numbers highlight the importance of lineup performance.

Murray-Boyles’ +21 was especially notable because he combined the strong plus-minus with a perfect shooting night.

For Miami, Adebayo’s minus-10 came despite his 24-point, 11-rebound, 8-assist performance.

That contrast demonstrates why a player can have a strong individual box score while still being part of a losing lineup result.

Most Important Player Matchups

Several individual battles shaped the game.

Brandon Ingram vs Miami’s Perimeter Defense

Ingram’s 38 points show that Miami struggled to consistently prevent him from creating efficient scoring opportunities.

His free-throw production made the problem worse.

Bam Adebayo vs Toronto’s Frontcourt

Adebayo produced 24 points and 11 rebounds.

He also created eight assists.

Toronto could not completely neutralize him individually.

Instead, the Raptors won through overall team performance.

Davion Mitchell vs Toronto’s Ball Pressure

Mitchell scored efficiently and created 11 assists.

But Toronto’s nine steals and four total turnovers demonstrated that the Raptors were more disruptive overall.

Toronto’s Bench vs Miami’s Rotation

Murray-Boyles was the standout bench player.

His 17 points and eight rebounds gave Toronto an extra advantage beyond its starting lineup.

Player Stats at a Glance

Miami Heat

Player	PTS	REB	AST	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Bam Adebayo	24	11	8	9-14	2-4	4-5	-10
Davion Mitchell	15	3	11	7-9	0-1	1-4	-17
Tyler Herro	15	4	4	6-12	3-5	0-0	-2
Jaime Jaquez Jr.	15	2	4	6-9	3-5	0-0	-31
Pelle Larsson	10	4	2	4-10	2-5	0-0	-21
Norman Powell	7	0	0	2-5	0-3	3-5	-23
Kel’el Ware	7	4	1	3-7	1-3	0-0	-19
Keshad Johnson	6	2	1	3-3	0-0	0-0	+11
Andrew Wiggins	5	1	2	2-6	1-4	0-0	+6

Toronto Raptors

Player	PTS	REB	AST	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Brandon Ingram	38	7	7	13-23	2-3	10-11	+13
RJ Barrett	22	6	3	6-15	1-5	9-10	+14
Collin Murray-Boyles	17	8	1	7-7	0-0	3-3	+21
Scottie Barnes	13	4	2	4-6	2-2	3-4	+4
Immanuel Quickley	11	3	4	4-10	3-7	0-0	+12
Jamal Shead	8	1	3	3-6	2-3	0-0	+13
Ja’Kobe Walter	7	3	2	2-5	2-5	1-2	+18
Jakob Poeltl	6	2	1	3-4	0-0	0-0	+4

What the Numbers Say About Miami

Miami’s statistics reveal a team that could score efficiently but struggled to control the game.

The 56% field-goal percentage was excellent.

The 35 assists were also strong.

Adebayo and Mitchell combined for 19 assists, giving Miami two players capable of creating opportunities.

However, the 13 turnovers hurt.

The 14 free-throw attempts also limited Miami’s scoring ceiling.

Miami’s 25 personal fouls were another important number.

Toronto was able to turn defensive pressure into free-throw opportunities, while Miami did not generate the same level of advantage.

What the Numbers Say About Toronto

Toronto’s profile was more balanced.

The Raptors shot 51% from the field and 43% from three.

They rebounded better.

<span style=”font-weight: 400;”>They protected the ball better.

They created more steals.</span>

They generated more offensive rebounds.</span>

Most importantly, they reached the free-throw line much more frequently.

Toronto’s 24 assists were lower than Miami’s 35, but the Raptors did not need as many assists because their scoring was highly efficient and their turnovers were extremely low.

The combination was enough to produce 128 points.

Three Biggest Reasons Toronto Won

1. Free-Throw Advantage

Toronto made 27 free throws compared with Miami’s eight.

That alone created a 19-point scoring difference.

2. Turnover Advantage

Toronto committed four turnovers.

Miami committed 13.

Nine extra turnovers gave Toronto a major possession advantage.

3. Strong First Half

Toronto led 69-50 at halftime.

Miami improved significantly after the break, but the Heat could not erase the early deficit.

Three Biggest Takeaways for Miami

1. Efficient Shooting Was Not Enough

Miami shot 56% from the field but still lost by 14.

The team needed more production from free throws and better possession control.

2. The Slow Start Was Costly

Allowing Toronto to score 69 points in the first half created unnecessary pressure.

The third-quarter response was impressive, but it came too late.

3. Individual Production Needed More Team Support

Adebayo, Mitchell, Herro, and Jaquez Jr. all produced at least 15 points.

Yet Toronto still won comfortably.

That suggests the problem was more about game control than a simple lack of scoring talent.

Three Biggest Takeaways for Toronto

1. Ingram Was the Offensive Difference-Maker

His 38 points provided the primary scoring punch.

His 10-of-11 free-throw shooting was particularly important.

2. Murray-Boyles Provided Outstanding Support

A perfect 7-of-7 shooting night, eight rebounds, and a plus-21 rating made his performance extremely valuable.

3. Toronto Protected Its Lead

The Raptors did not panic when Miami scored 40 points in the third quarter.

They responded by winning the fourth quarter and securing the 128-114 victory.

How to Read These Player Stats Correctly

A box score is most useful when individual numbers are connected to team context.

Points tell you who scored.

Field-goal attempts show volume.

Shooting percentages show efficiency.

Rebounds show possession control.

Assists show playmaking.

Turnovers show lost possessions.

Steals show defensive disruption.

Plus-minus provides additional lineup context.

No single number tells the entire story.

For example, Adebayo’s 24-11-8 line was excellent.

Ingram’s 38-point performance was outstanding.

Murray-Boyles’ 7-of-7 shooting was exceptional.

But Toronto’s victory was created by the combined effect of many smaller advantages.

That is why the miami heat vs toronto raptors match player stats should be evaluated as a complete statistical picture rather than as a list of individual scoring totals.

FAQs

Who scored the most points in the Miami vs Toronto game?

Brandon Ingram led all players with 38 points for Toronto. He also recorded seven rebounds and seven assists.

What was the final score between Miami and Toronto?

The Toronto Raptors defeated the Miami Heat 128-114 at Scotiabank Arena.

How many points did Bam Adebayo score?

Bam Adebayo scored 24 points. He also collected 11 rebounds and eight assists.

Did Miami shoot better than Toronto?

Yes. Miami shot 56% from the field, while Toronto shot 51%. However, Toronto had major advantages in free throws, turnovers, rebounds, and steals.

How many turnovers did each team have?

Miami committed 13 turnovers, while Toronto committed only four.

Who was Toronto’s most efficient bench player?

Collin Murray-Boyles was the standout. He scored 17 points while making all seven of his field-goal attempts and all three of his free throws.

Conclusion

The miami heat vs toronto raptors match player stats show that Toronto’s 128-114 victory was built on more than Brandon Ingram’s 38 points.

Ingram provided the headline performance, while RJ Barrett added 22 points and strong free-throw shooting. Collin Murray-Boyles delivered one of the most efficient performances of the game from the bench. Scottie Barnes and Immanuel Quickley also provided efficient supporting contributions.

For Miami, Bam Adebayo produced the most complete individual performance with 24 points, 11 rebounds, and eight assists. Davion Mitchell added 15 points and 11 assists, while Tyler Herro and Jaime Jaquez Jr. also reached 15 points.

The biggest statistical differences were elsewhere.

Toronto made 27 free throws compared with Miami’s eight. The Raptors committed only four turnovers compared with Miami’s 13. Toronto also won the rebounding battle 40-34 and recorded nine steals compared with Miami’s one.

Miami’s 56% field-goal shooting and 40% three-point shooting were not enough to overcome those disadvantages.

The first half ultimately set the tone. Toronto led 69-50 at halftime, and although Miami responded with a 40-point third quarter, the Heat could not erase the deficit.

The final numbers therefore point toward a balanced Toronto performance rather than a victory based solely on one superstar. Ingram was the leading scorer, but Toronto’s ball security, free-throw advantage, rebounding, defensive pressure, and bench production created the complete winning formula.

The result also completed Toronto’s 4-0 season sweep of Miami, making this matchup particularly significant when evaluating the teams’ performances against each other during the season.