New York Jets vs Bengals Match Player Stats
The new york jets vs bengals match player stats from the October 26, 2025 matchup tell the story of one of the most dramatic games of the season. The New York Jets defeated the Cincinnati Bengals 39-38 at Paycor Stadium after a remarkable fourth-quarter comeback. The Jets finished with 502 total yards, while Cincinnati produced 398.
This game was not simply about the final score. It featured 435 combined rushing yards, 465 passing yards, nine total touchdowns, five field goals or extra-point conversions, and several individual performances that shaped the result.
Justin Fields completed 21 of 32 passes for 244 yards and one touchdown. Breece Hall added 133 rushing yards and two rushing touchdowns. He also delivered the decisive touchdown pass to Mason Taylor late in the fourth quarter. On Cincinnati’s side, Joe Flacco passed for 223 yards and two touchdowns, while Ja’Marr Chase caught 12 passes for 91 yards.
The following breakdown examines the important numbers from the game, explains which players made the biggest impact, and shows why the statistics tell a more detailed story than the final score alone.
Game Overview and Final Result
The Jets entered the game at 0-7, while the Bengals were 3-4 before kickoff. New York eventually secured its first victory of the season by winning 39-38.
The matchup took place on October 26, 2025, at Paycor Stadium in Cincinnati.
Final Score
| Team | Score |
| New York Jets | 39 |
| Cincinnati Bengals | 38 |
The scoring pattern was especially interesting.
The Bengals led 10-0 after the first quarter. Cincinnati also held a 24-13 advantage at halftime. The Jets then responded in the second half and scored 26 points after halftime.
| Quarter | Jets | Bengals |
| Q1 | 0 | 10 |
| Q2 | 13 | 14 |
| Q3 | 3 | 7 |
| Q4 | 23 | 7 |
| Final | 39 | 38 |
The fourth quarter was the defining period.
New York scored 23 points in the final quarter. Cincinnati scored only seven. That swing turned a seven-point deficit into a one-point Jets victory.
New York Jets vs Bengals Match Player Stats
The new york jets vs bengals match player stats show a fascinating contrast between the two offenses.
New York generated 502 total yards from 70 offensive plays. Cincinnati produced 398 yards from only 58 plays.
That difference is important.
The Jets averaged 7.2 yards per offensive play. Cincinnati averaged 6.9 yards per play. New York also controlled the ball for 33:40 compared with Cincinnati’s 26:20.
The Jets finished with:
- 25 first downs
- 254 rushing yards
- 248 passing yards
- 502 total yards
- 37 rushing attempts
- 33 pass attempts
- 7-of-15 on third down
- 2-of-3 on fourth down
- 3-of-5 in the red zone
- 0 turnovers
Cincinnati finished with:
- 24 first downs
- 181 rushing yards
- 217 passing yards
- 398 total yards
- 23 rushing attempts
- 34 pass attempts
- 4-of-9 on third down
- 0-of-1 on fourth down
- 3-of-4 in the red zone
- 0 turnovers
The most important statistical difference was offensive volume.
New York ran 12 more offensive plays than Cincinnati. That gave the Jets additional opportunities to move the ball and eventually produce enough points to win.
Justin Fields Passing Performance
Justin Fields was one of the central figures in the Jets’ victory.
He completed 21 of 32 passes for 244 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions.
His completion rate was:
21 ÷ 32 = 65.6%
That is a strong completion percentage, particularly in a game where the opposing offense scored 38 points.
Fields averaged 7.6 yards per completed pass attempt according to the supplied player data. His passer rating was 99.0, while his QBR was listed at 63.8.
Justin Fields Passing Stats
| Statistic | Justin Fields |
| Completions | 21 |
| Attempts | 32 |
| Completion Rate | 65.6% |
| Passing Yards | 244 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 7.6 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 99.0 |
| QBR | 63.8 |
The most important part of Fields’ performance was his lack of turnovers.
He did not throw an interception. In a one-point game, that matters enormously.
The Jets also received an additional passing contribution from Breece Hall, who completed his only pass attempt for four yards and a touchdown.
That unusual play became one of the game’s most important moments.
Breece Hall Was the Offensive Star
If one player deserves special attention in the new york jets vs bengals match player stats, it is Breece Hall.
Hall rushed 18 times for 133 yards and two touchdowns.
His average was 7.4 yards per carry.
He also recorded a 35-yard longest run.
Breece Hall Rushing Stats
| Statistic | Breece Hall |
| Carries | 18 |
| Rushing Yards | 133 |
| Average | 7.4 |
| Rushing TDs | 2 |
| Longest Run | 35 yards |
| Receptions | 2 |
| Receiving Yards | 14 |
| Passing TDs | 1 |
Hall’s rushing efficiency was outstanding.
New York had 37 rushing attempts for 254 yards. Hall accounted for 133 of those yards.
That means he produced more than half of the Jets’ rushing yards.
His two touchdowns were also critical because both came during the Jets’ second-half comeback.
But Hall’s impact went beyond traditional rushing statistics.
He also completed a pass for four yards and a touchdown. That play gave the Jets another scoring weapon when Cincinnati was trying to defend a comeback.
This is a good example of why box-score analysis should not focus only on passing and rushing totals.
A player can influence a game through unusual plays that do not appear in conventional offensive rankings.
Isaiah Davis Provided Explosive Support
Isaiah Davis had an efficient game for New York.
He rushed seven times for 65 yards.
That produced an impressive 9.3 yards per carry.
His longest run was 50 yards.
A 50-yard run on only seven attempts significantly changes the way a defense must approach the running game.
Davis also caught five passes for 44 yards.
His combined rushing and receiving production was:
65 rushing yards + 44 receiving yards = 109 total yards
That made him one of the most productive all-around players for New York.
His receiving role was particularly useful because it added another way for the Jets to move the ball without relying entirely on Fields or Hall.
Other Jets Rushing Performances
Justin Fields carried the ball 11 times for 31 yards.
That gave him an average of 2.8 yards per carry.
Isaiah Williams had just one rushing attempt, but it went for 25 yards.
The Jets’ rushing distribution was therefore heavily concentrated around Hall and Davis.
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD |
| Breece Hall | 18 | 133 | 7.4 | 2 |
| Isaiah Davis | 7 | 65 | 9.3 | 0 |
| Justin Fields | 11 | 31 | 2.8 | 0 |
| Isaiah Williams | 1 | 25 | 25.0 | 0 |
| Team | 37 | 254 | 6.9 | 2 |
The team average of 6.9 yards per carry was excellent.
New York consistently created explosive rushing opportunities, and those plays helped compensate for the Bengals’ ability to score quickly.
Jets Receiving Leaders
The Jets did not rely on one dominant receiver.
Instead, the passing attack was spread across several players.
Tyler Johnson led New York in receiving yardage with 64 yards on three catches.
He averaged 21.3 yards per reception and scored one touchdown.
Mason Taylor caught five passes for 34 yards and one touchdown. His touchdown was especially important because it came from Hall’s fourth-quarter touchdown pass.
Isaiah Davis added five catches for 44 yards.
Isaiah Williams caught three passes for 31 yards.
Jets Receiving Stats
| Player | Rec. | Yards | Avg. | TD | Targets |
| Tyler Johnson | 3 | 64 | 21.3 | 1 | 5 |
| Isaiah Davis | 5 | 44 | 8.8 | 0 | 5 |
| Mason Taylor | 5 | 34 | 6.8 | 1 | 8 |
| Isaiah Williams | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 0 | 4 |
| Jeremy Ruckert | 1 | 24 | 24.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Arian Smith | 1 | 23 | 23.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Breece Hall | 2 | 14 | 7.0 | 0 | 3 |
| Andrew Beck | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Allen Lazard | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 2 |
The distribution shows that the Jets created production from multiple areas.
That made the offense harder to predict.
Mason Taylor’s Important Touchdown
Mason Taylor caught five passes for 34 yards.
His biggest contribution was his touchdown.
The scoring play became particularly memorable because Breece Hall was the passer.
Hall completed his only pass attempt for four yards and a touchdown.
The combination of Hall’s rushing ability and his passing contribution created an unusual statistical profile.
A running back producing two rushing touchdowns and a passing touchdown in the same game is a major contribution to a comeback victory.
Joe Flacco’s Passing Performance
Joe Flacco produced a solid statistical game for Cincinnati.
He completed 21 of 34 passes for 223 yards and two touchdowns.
He did not throw an interception.
His passer rating was listed at 100.5.
Joe Flacco Passing Stats
| Statistic | Joe Flacco |
| Completions | 21 |
| Attempts | 34 |
| Completion Rate | 61.8% |
| Passing Yards | 223 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 6.6 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 100.5 |
| QBR | 44.4 |
| Sacks | 1 |
Flacco’s statistics show why Cincinnati was able to score 38 points.
He avoided interceptions and produced two passing touchdowns.
However, Cincinnati’s passing game did not produce enough total yardage to match New York’s overall offensive output.
The Bengals recorded 217 net passing yards compared with 248 for the Jets.
Ja’Marr Chase Led the Bengals in Receptions
Ja’Marr Chase was heavily involved in Cincinnati’s passing attack.
He caught 12 passes for 91 yards.
He received 19 targets.
That means Chase accounted for more than half of Flacco’s completed passes.
His catch rate based on the supplied numbers was:
12 ÷ 19 = 63.2%
Chase did not score a touchdown, but his 91 receiving yards made him Cincinnati’s leading receiver.
Ja’Marr Chase Receiving Stats
| Statistic | Ja’Marr Chase |
| Receptions | 12 |
| Targets | 19 |
| Receiving Yards | 91 |
| Average | 7.6 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest Reception | 17 yards |
The 19 targets demonstrate how strongly Cincinnati depended on Chase.
He was repeatedly used as a reliable option, particularly when the Bengals needed to maintain possession.
Tee Higgins Made His Opportunity Count
Tee Higgins had only one reception.
However, that reception went for 44 yards and a touchdown.
That gives him an unusual stat line:
1 reception, 44 yards, 1 touchdown
His 44-yard reception was also Cincinnati’s longest completion among the listed receiving performances.
This is a perfect example of why receptions alone do not measure impact.
Higgins had limited volume but generated a major scoring play.
Other Bengals Receiving Contributions
Noah Fant caught three passes for 41 yards.
Chase Brown caught three passes for 32 yards and one touchdown.
Tanner Hudson added one reception for nine yards.
Samaje Perine caught one pass for six yards.
Andrei Iosivas was targeted three times but finished without a reception.
Bengals Receiving Stats
| Player | Rec. | Yards | Avg. | TD | Targets |
| Ja’Marr Chase | 12 | 91 | 7.6 | 0 | 19 |
| Tee Higgins | 1 | 44 | 44.0 | 1 | 2 |
| Noah Fant | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 0 | 3 |
| Chase Brown | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 1 | 3 |
| Tanner Hudson | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Samaje Perine | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Andrei Iosivas | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 3 |
The numbers reveal two different approaches.
Cincinnati concentrated volume on Chase, while several other players provided explosive individual plays.
Cincinnati’s Running Game
The Bengals rushed for 181 yards on 23 attempts.
Their average was 7.9 yards per carry.
Samaje Perine led the Bengals with 94 rushing yards on nine attempts.
His 10.4-yard average was extremely efficient.
He also scored one touchdown.
Chase Brown carried the ball 12 times for 73 yards and one touchdown.
Joe Flacco added 14 rushing yards and a touchdown on two attempts.
Bengals Rushing Stats
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Samaje Perine | 9 | 94 | 10.4 | 1 | 32 |
| Chase Brown | 12 | 73 | 6.1 | 1 | 22 |
| Joe Flacco | 2 | 14 | 7.0 | 1 | 13 |
| Team | 23 | 181 | 7.9 | 3 | 32 |
Cincinnati’s rushing efficiency was impressive.
The bigger issue was volume.
The Bengals ran only 23 rushing plays compared with 37 for New York.
That 14-attempt difference gave the Jets more opportunities to control the game through the ground attack.
Defensive Player Stats
The defensive statistics provide another interesting contrast.
New York recorded 60 total tackles, one sack, three tackles for loss, seven passes defended, and two quarterback hits.
Cincinnati recorded 83 tackles, no sacks, three tackles for loss, four passes defended, and one quarterback hit.
The higher tackle total for Cincinnati does not necessarily mean its defense played better.
In this game, the Bengals faced more offensive plays and spent more time defending.
That naturally created more tackling opportunities.
Jets Defensive Leaders
Malachi Moore led the Jets with eight tackles.
Jarvis Brownlee Jr. recorded seven tackles and two passes defended.
Quincy Williams also finished with seven tackles, one tackle for loss, and two passes defended.
Azareye’h Thomas added six tackles and one pass defended.
Will McDonald IV recorded the Jets’ only sack.
Jets Defensive Stats
| Player | Tackles | Solo | Sacks | TFL | PD |
| Malachi Moore | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jarvis Brownlee Jr. | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Quincy Williams | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Azareye’h Thomas | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jamien Sherwood | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kiko Mauigoa | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jermaine Johnson II | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Will McDonald IV | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
New York’s defense did not dominate the Bengals.
Allowing 38 points makes that clear.
However, the defense made enough plays to prevent Cincinnati from closing out the game.
Bengals Defensive Leaders
Demetrius Knight Jr. led all players in tackles with 12.
Geno Stone recorded nine tackles.
Barrett Carter and Jordan Battle each recorded eight.
B.J. Hill had six tackles.
Dax Hill and Logan Wilson each recorded five.
Bengals Defensive Stats
| Player | Tackles | Solo | Sacks | TFL | PD |
| Demetrius Knight Jr. | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Geno Stone | 9 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Barrett Carter | 8 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Jordan Battle | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| B.J. Hill | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dax Hill | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Logan Wilson | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cam Taylor-Britt | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Joseph Ossai | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
One major defensive statistic stands out.
Cincinnati recorded zero sacks.
That gave Fields additional time to operate the offense and contributed to New York’s ability to finish with 248 passing yards.
Team Statistics That Explain the Result
The new york jets vs bengals match player stats become much easier to understand when viewed alongside the team statistics.
| Category | Jets | Bengals |
| First Downs | 25 | 24 |
| Total Yards | 502 | 398 |
| Passing Yards | 248 | 217 |
| Rushing Yards | 254 | 181 |
| Offensive Plays | 70 | 58 |
| Yards Per Play | 7.2 | 6.9 |
| Third Down | 7/15 | 4/9 |
| Fourth Down | 2/3 | 0/1 |
| Red Zone | 3/5 | 3/4 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 0 |
| Time of Possession | 33:40 | 26:20 |
The most significant numbers are total yards and offensive plays.
New York gained 104 more yards.
The Jets also ran 12 more plays.
They controlled possession for more than seven additional minutes.
Cincinnati actually had a better rushing average, and its red-zone efficiency was higher.
Yet New York generated more overall production.
That combination explains how the Jets could win despite allowing 38 points.
Third Down and Fourth Down Efficiency
Situational football was another important part of the result.
New York converted seven of 15 third-down opportunities.
That equals 46.7%.
Cincinnati converted four of nine.
That equals 44.4%.
The difference was not huge, but New York had more total opportunities.
The bigger contrast appeared on fourth down.
The Jets converted two of three fourth-down attempts.
Cincinnati went 0-for-1.
When a game is decided by one point, extending drives can be extremely valuable.
The Jets did a better job of keeping possessions alive when third down was not enough.
Red Zone Performance
Cincinnati was more efficient in the red zone.
The Bengals scored on three of four red-zone trips.
That produced a 75% red-zone touchdown efficiency rate based on the supplied team data.
New York scored on three of five trips, producing 60%.
This shows that Cincinnati’s offense was highly effective when it reached scoring territory.
The problem was that New York generated more overall opportunities and more yardage.
This is an important lesson when analyzing football statistics.
The most efficient team in one category does not automatically win the game.
Football results are shaped by the combination of efficiency, volume, field position, possession, and late-game execution.
Special Teams Contributions
Special teams also played a role.
Nick Folk was perfect for New York.
He made all three of his field-goal attempts and both extra points.
His longest field goal was 46 yards.
He scored 11 points.
Cincinnati’s Evan McPherson made his only field-goal attempt from 26 yards.
He also converted all five extra-point attempts.
He finished with eight points.
Kickers
| Kicker | FG | XP | Points |
| Nick Folk | 3/3 | 2/2 | 11 |
| Evan McPherson | 1/1 | 5/5 | 8 |
The kicking difference was three points in favor of New York.
In a one-point game, that is significant.
Return Game Comparison
Isaiah Williams was important for New York’s return game.
He returned five kickoffs for 132 yards.
His average was 26.4 yards per return.
He also recorded three punt returns for 38 yards.
Arian Smith added one kickoff return for 18 yards.
New York finished with 150 kickoff return yards.
Cincinnati’s Charlie Jones returned five kickoffs for 114 yards.
His average was 22.8 yards.
Kick Return Stats
| Team | Returns | Yards | Average |
| Jets | 6 | 150 | 25.0 |
| Bengals | 5 | 114 | 22.8 |
New York therefore gained 36 more kickoff return yards.
That contributed to better overall field-position potential.
Punting Comparison
The Bengals actually produced the stronger raw punting average.
Ryan Rehkow punted three times for 174 yards.
His average was 58.0 yards, with a long of 65.
Austin McNamara punted twice for 81 yards.
His average was 40.5 yards.
However, raw punt distance does not tell the entire story.
Net punting average and field position are more useful when evaluating actual special-teams impact.
New York’s net punting average was 30.5 yards, compared with 45.3 for Cincinnati.
That difference shows why a longer punt does not automatically mean better field-position results.
Turnovers Were Completely Absent
One of the cleanest parts of the game was the turnover column.
Neither team lost a fumble.
Neither team threw an interception.
That means both teams finished with:
0 turnovers
This makes the offensive and situational differences even more important.
The Jets did not win because they forced turnovers.
They won because they produced more offensive yardage, ran more plays, controlled possession, converted more third downs, and executed better during the decisive stages of the game.
Why the Jets Won
The statistics point to several clear reasons.
1. New York dominated total offensive production
The Jets gained 502 yards.
Cincinnati gained 398.
A 104-yard advantage is substantial.
2. The Jets ran the ball more often
New York had 37 rushing attempts.
Cincinnati had 23.
The Jets gained 254 rushing yards.
That allowed them to maintain a balanced attack.
3. Breece Hall produced explosive plays
Hall averaged 7.4 yards per carry and scored twice.
His contribution also included a passing touchdown.
That made him the game’s most influential offensive player.
4. Justin Fields protected the football
Fields threw for 244 yards and one touchdown without an interception.
He also contributed 31 rushing yards.
5. New York controlled possession
The Jets held the ball for 33:40.
Cincinnati had possession for 26:20.
That gave New York more opportunities to build drives.
6. The Jets finished strongly
New York scored 23 points in the fourth quarter.
That was the decisive statistical difference.
Why Cincinnati Lost Despite Scoring 38 Points
Cincinnati’s offense was good enough to score 38 points.
It also produced 181 rushing yards and 217 passing yards.
The Bengals scored five touchdowns.
So why did they lose?
The answer is that the Jets produced even more.
Cincinnati’s defense could not consistently stop New York’s rushing attack.
The Bengals also failed to record a sack.
New York’s 502 total yards put constant pressure on the Cincinnati defense.
The Jets also won the time-of-possession battle and ran 12 more offensive plays.
That combination created enough additional opportunities for New York to overcome Cincinnati’s strong scoring efficiency.
The Most Important Statistical Matchups
Several individual matchups stand out when studying the box score.
Justin Fields vs Joe Flacco
Fields:
- 244 passing yards
- 1 passing touchdown
- 0 interceptions
- 31 rushing yards
Flacco:
- 223 passing yards
- 2 passing touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- 14 rushing yards
- 1 rushing touchdown
Flacco produced more passing touchdowns.
Fields produced more passing yards.
The difference was that New York received significant rushing production from Hall and Davis.
Breece Hall vs Cincinnati’s Run Defense
Hall:
- 133 rushing yards
- 2 rushing touchdowns
- 7.4 yards per carry
The Bengals struggled to contain New York’s ground attack.
Hall was the centerpiece.
Ja’Marr Chase vs Jets Coverage
Chase:
- 12 receptions
- 91 yards
- 19 targets
The Jets allowed Chase to receive heavy volume but prevented him from reaching the end zone.
That distinction mattered.
Chase accumulated catches, but Cincinnati needed more explosive scoring production from its passing game.
What the Numbers Say About Offensive Balance
New York’s offense was more balanced than the final score might initially suggest.
The Jets produced:
248 passing yards + 254 rushing yards = 502 total yards
That is almost a perfect 50-50 split.
Passing accounted for roughly 49.4% of total yardage.
Rushing accounted for roughly 50.6%.
Cincinnati was also reasonably balanced:
217 passing yards + 181 rushing yards = 398 total yards
But the Bengals leaned slightly more toward passing.
This difference is important because New York’s rushing efficiency allowed the offense to remain productive without putting all responsibility on Fields.
What These Player Stats Reveal
The biggest lesson from this game is that individual statistics should always be viewed in context.
For example, Cincinnati had 83 defensive tackles compared with 60 for New York.
That does not automatically mean Cincinnati’s defense was better.
The Bengals faced 70 offensive plays from New York.
New York faced only 58 offensive plays.
More plays naturally create more tackle opportunities.
Similarly, Cincinnati averaged 7.9 yards per rushing attempt.
That was better than New York’s 6.9.
Yet New York gained more total rushing yards because it ran the ball 14 more times.
This is why volume and efficiency must be considered together.
A Practical Way to Analyze NFL Box Scores
If you are comparing player performances from an NFL game, do not look at one statistic alone.
A better process is:
- Start with the final score.
- Compare total yards.
- Compare offensive plays.
- Examine rushing and passing balance.
- Check turnovers.
- Review third and fourth down.
- Look at red-zone efficiency.
- Identify the highest-impact players.
- Review time of possession.
- Study explosive plays and scoring plays.
This method gives a much clearer picture than simply looking at who had the most yards.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Jets vs Bengals game on October 26, 2025?
The New York Jets defeated the Cincinnati Bengals 39-38 at Paycor Stadium.
Who was the leading rusher in the game?
Breece Hall led all Jets rushers with 133 yards and two touchdowns on 18 carries. Samaje Perine led Cincinnati with 94 yards on nine carries.
How did Justin Fields perform?
Justin Fields completed 21 of 32 passes for 244 yards and one touchdown. He threw no interceptions and added 31 rushing yards.
How many yards did Ja’Marr Chase have?
Ja’Marr Chase caught 12 passes for 91 yards on 19 targets. He did not score a touchdown.
Did either team commit a turnover?
No. Neither team lost a fumble or threw an interception.
Which team had more total yards?
The New York Jets had 502 total yards, while Cincinnati had 398. New York therefore produced 104 more yards.
Conclusion
The new york jets vs bengals match player stats show a game decided by offensive volume, rushing production, situational execution, and an outstanding fourth-quarter comeback.
Justin Fields provided efficient quarterback play without turning the ball over. Breece Hall was the standout offensive performer with 133 rushing yards, two rushing touchdowns, and a passing touchdown. Isaiah Davis added 109 combined rushing and receiving yards.
For Cincinnati, Joe Flacco produced two passing touchdowns without an interception. Ja’Marr Chase led the receiving group with 91 yards on 19 targets, while Samaje Perine delivered 94 rushing yards at an excellent 10.4 yards per carry.
The Bengals were efficient in several areas, especially red-zone scoring and rushing average. However, the Jets produced 502 total yards, ran 70 offensive plays, controlled possession for 33:40, and scored 23 fourth-quarter points.
The final 39-38 score therefore makes sense when the complete statistical picture is considered. New York did not win because Cincinnati played poorly in every area. The Jets won because they generated more total opportunities and executed better when the game reached its decisive moments.