Washington Wizards vs Lakers Match Player Stats

The washington wizards vs lakers match player stats from March 31, 2026, tell a much clearer story than the final score alone. The Los Angeles Lakers defeated the Washington Wizards 120-101 at Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles, but the important details came from the way each team produced its offense, controlled the glass, and handled the game after a close opening quarter.

The Lakers entered the game with a 49-26 record and a strong 25-12 home mark, while Washington came in at 17-58 and 6-32 on the road. Los Angeles eventually created separation with a dominant second quarter, outscoring Washington 40-18. That 22-point swing became the defining stretch of the game.

LeBron James recorded a triple-double with 21 points, 10 rebounds, and 12 assists, while Austin Reaves added 19 points and 9 assists. The Lakers also received 19 points from Jaxson Hayes and 19 from Luke Kennard. For Washington, Will Riley led the team with 20 points, followed by Justin Champagnie’s 18 and Tristan Vukcevic’s 14.

This breakdown examines the complete player production, team statistics, quarter-by-quarter scoring, shooting efficiency, rebounding, playmaking, defensive contributions, and the factors that explain why Los Angeles finished with a 120-101 victory.

Washington Wizards vs Lakers Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The March 31 matchup was played at Crypto.com Arena in front of 18,997 fans. The Lakers won 120-101, completing a 2-0 season sweep over Washington.

Category	Washington Wizards	Los Angeles Lakers
Final Score	101	120
Record	17-58	49-26
Road/Home Record	6-32 Away	25-12 Home
Field Goals	41-93	44-79
Field Goal %	44%	56%
Three-Pointers	7-35	7-24
Three-Point %	20%	29%
Free Throws	12-16	25-32
Free Throw %	75%	78%
Rebounds	33	48
Assists	25	29
Turnovers	9	15
Steals	11	7
Blocks	2	9

The most important statistical difference was shooting efficiency. Washington attempted 93 field goals but made only 41, while Los Angeles made 44 of 79 attempts. The Lakers therefore needed 14 fewer field-goal attempts to score 19 more points.

That difference is especially important when evaluating the game beyond the box score. Washington actually protected the ball better, committing only nine turnovers compared with 15 by Los Angeles. The Wizards also generated 11 steals. However, their 44% field-goal shooting and 20% three-point shooting limited the value of those extra possessions.

Los Angeles compensated for its turnovers with superior shooting, rebounding, interior defense, and free-throw production.

Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

The game changed dramatically after the first quarter.

Quarter	Washington Wizards	Los Angeles Lakers
Q1	26	25
Q2	18	40
Q3	33	26
Q4	24	29
Total	101	120

First Quarter: Wizards Keep Pace

Washington opened the game competitively, scoring 26 points compared with 25 from Los Angeles.

A one-point Lakers lead after 12 minutes suggested a balanced contest. Washington was able to generate enough offense to stay within striking distance, while Los Angeles had not yet established the separation that eventually decided the game.

This opening period is important because it shows that the final 19-point margin did not develop immediately.

Second Quarter: Lakers Create the Separation

The second quarter was the turning point.

Los Angeles scored 40 points while Washington managed only 18. The Lakers therefore gained 22 points in a single period and went into halftime with the momentum firmly on their side.

The difference was not simply volume. Los Angeles finished the game shooting 56% from the field, and its depth became increasingly important as the contest progressed.

This quarter also demonstrates why quarter-by-quarter statistics are useful when studying a box score. Looking only at the final margin can hide the exact moment when a competitive game became one-sided.

Third Quarter: Washington Responds

Washington responded with its best offensive quarter of the game, scoring 33 points.

The Wizards outscored Los Angeles 33-26 during the period, showing that the game was not simply a continuous defensive collapse. Washington had enough offensive production to challenge the Lakers after halftime.

However, the Wizards were still carrying the disadvantage created during the second quarter.

Fourth Quarter: Lakers Close the Game

Los Angeles scored 29 points in the fourth quarter compared with Washington’s 24.

The Lakers therefore avoided another major swing and controlled the final period. Washington’s third-quarter response was not enough to erase the halftime deficit, and Los Angeles finished with a 19-point victory.

Lakers Player Stats and Individual Performances

The Lakers’ offensive production was spread across several players rather than relying on one scorer.

LeBron James

LeBron James delivered one of the most complete performances of the night:

• 21 points
• 10 rebounds
• 12 assists
• 8-of-16 field goals
• 1-of-3 three-pointers
• 4-of-6 free throws

The triple-double stands out immediately, but the 12 assists are equally important when assessing his influence.

James was not simply a high-volume scorer. He contributed as a rebounder and primary creator while shooting 50% from the field based on the supplied game statistics.

His 10 rebounds also helped the Lakers establish a major advantage on the glass. When a primary ball-handler is simultaneously contributing double-digit rebounds and assists, his statistical impact extends across several areas of the game.

Austin Reaves

Austin Reaves finished with:

• 19 points
• 3 rebounds
• 9 assists
• 4-of-11 field goals
• 11-of-12 free throws

The free-throw numbers are particularly notable. Reaves made 11 of 12 attempts from the line, helping Los Angeles turn offensive opportunities into reliable points.

His nine assists also made him an important secondary creator alongside James. The Lakers therefore had two players capable of creating offense and moving the ball rather than placing all of their playmaking responsibility on one player.

Rui Hachimura

Rui Hachimura recorded:

• 14 points
• 6 rebounds
• 6-of-10 field goals
• 1-of-3 three-pointers
• 1-of-2 free throws

His 60% shooting from the field was efficient and helped support the Lakers’ overall 56% field-goal percentage.

Hachimura’s six rebounds also contributed to the team’s significant advantage on the boards.

Deandre Ayton

Deandre Ayton produced an efficient interior performance:

• 12 points
• 7 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 5-of-5 field goals
• 3 blocks

The most striking number is his perfect 5-of-5 shooting.

His three blocks were also a major part of the Lakers’ nine total blocks. Washington’s 101 points might initially suggest that the Wizards found some offensive success, but the Lakers’ rim protection helped prevent Washington from converting efficiently around the basket.

Jake LaRavia

Jake LaRavia finished with:

• 4 points
• 3 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 2-of-3 field goals

His scoring total was modest, but he contributed efficiently from the field and added secondary playmaking.

Jaxson Hayes

Jaxson Hayes was one of the Lakers’ most productive bench players:

• 19 points
• 7 rebounds
• 8-of-8 field goals
• 1-of-1 three-pointers
• 2 blocks

The perfect 8-of-8 shooting is one of the strongest individual efficiency numbers in the game.

Hayes also added seven rebounds and two blocks, giving Los Angeles valuable production on both ends of the floor.

Luke Kennard

Luke Kennard also scored 19 points:

• 19 points
• 2 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 7-of-10 field goals
• 4-of-5 three-pointers

His perimeter shooting was especially valuable. Kennard converted four of five attempts from three-point range, providing spacing and efficient scoring.

His 70% field-goal shooting was another reason the Lakers could maintain a high overall shooting percentage despite making only seven threes as a team.

Jarred Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt contributed four points, eight rebounds, and one assist.

His eight rebounds were valuable, particularly because rebounding was one of the areas where Los Angeles created a substantial team advantage.

Bronny James

Bronny James finished with:

• 6 points
• 1 rebound
• 1 assist

His production added to the Lakers’ balanced scoring distribution.

Other Lakers Bench Production

The remaining Lakers statistics included:

• Drew Timme: 0 points, 1 rebound, 1 assist
• Dalton Knecht: 0 points, 1 assist
• Kobe Bufkin: 2 points

Luka Doncic did not play, listed as DNP due to the coach’s decision.

The absence of Doncic is relevant when interpreting the Lakers’ offensive distribution. Despite his non-participation, Los Angeles still scored 120 points through contributions from James, Reaves, Hachimura, Hayes, Kennard, Ayton, and the rest of the rotation.

Washington Wizards Player Stats and Individual Performances

Washington’s scoring was led by a younger group of contributors, with Will Riley leading the team at 20 points.

Will Riley

Will Riley finished with:

• 20 points
• 2 rebounds
• 2 assists

He was Washington’s leading scorer in the game.

His 20 points represented the largest individual scoring total for the Wizards, but Washington needed more efficient team shooting to convert that production into a closer result.

Justin Champagnie

Justin Champagnie recorded:

• 18 points
• 4 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 8-of-12 field goals
• 1-of-2 three-pointers

Champagnie was one of Washington’s most efficient offensive players. He made eight of 12 field-goal attempts, giving him a strong 66.7% shooting rate based on the supplied statistics.

His performance stands out because Washington as a team shot only 44%.

Tristan Vukcevic

Tristan Vukcevic finished with:

• 14 points
• 3 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 4 steals
• 1 block

The four steals were particularly notable.

While Washington lost the rebounding and shooting battles, Vukcevic’s defensive activity gave the Wizards extra opportunities to disrupt Los Angeles’ offense.

Tre Johnson

Tre Johnson recorded:

• 11 points
• 6 rebounds
• 2 assists

His six rebounds were meaningful because Washington finished with only 33 total rebounds, compared with 48 for Los Angeles.

Bub Carrington

Bub Carrington finished with:

• 5 points
• 1 rebound
• 7 assists

The seven assists were his most significant contribution.

Carrington’s playmaking helped Washington generate 25 team assists, but the Wizards’ lower shooting percentage meant those opportunities did not consistently become efficient scoring possessions.

Anthony Gill

Anthony Gill contributed:

• 11 points
• 5 rebounds
• 1 assist

His five rebounds and 11 points gave Washington useful frontcourt production from the bench.

Jaden Hardy

Jaden Hardy finished with:

• 11 points
• 5 rebounds

His scoring provided another double-digit contribution from the Washington bench.

Jamir Watkins

Jamir Watkins recorded:

• 8 points
• 5 rebounds
• 5 assists
• 2 steals

His statistical profile was balanced. Rather than contributing primarily as a scorer, Watkins affected the game through rebounding, playmaking, and defensive activity.

Sharife Cooper

Sharife Cooper finished with:

• 3 points
• 2 rebounds
• 5 assists

His five assists added to Washington’s 25 total assists.

Washington Players Who Did Not Play

Three Wizards were listed as DNP:

• Kyshawn George, left elbow
• Alex Sarr, left toe
• Bilal Coulibaly, right heel

These non-participation notes are important when evaluating the available rotation and avoiding assumptions about players who were not involved in the game.

Shooting Efficiency Explains Much of the Result

One of the clearest statistical differences was field-goal efficiency.

Washington:

• 41-of-93 from the field
• 44%

Los Angeles:

• 44-of-79 from the field
• 56%

The Lakers made only three more field goals, yet they attempted 14 fewer shots.

That is a major efficiency advantage.

Washington’s 93 attempts suggest that the Wizards had enough possessions and opportunities to score more. The problem was conversion. At 44%, a large number of attempts did not translate into enough points.

Los Angeles, meanwhile, converted 56% of its field-goal attempts.

This is one of the most useful lessons when reading washington wizards vs lakers match player stats. Shot totals alone do not explain offensive success. The percentage of those shots that become points matters just as much.

Three-Point Shooting Was Not the Main Difference

Interestingly, neither team had an exceptional night from three-point range.

Washington shot:

• 7-of-35
• 20%

Los Angeles shot:

• 7-of-24
• 29%

Both teams made exactly seven three-pointers.

The difference came from attempts and efficiency. Washington needed 35 attempts to make seven threes, while Los Angeles needed 24 attempts to reach the same total.

That means the Lakers gained an advantage by limiting wasted possessions from outside while maintaining much better overall field-goal efficiency.

This game therefore was not decided by a huge three-point volume advantage. It was more about overall shot-making, interior production, free throws, and rebounding.

Free Throws Gave the Lakers Another Advantage

Los Angeles made 25 of 32 free throws, compared with 12 of 16 for Washington.

Both teams shot reasonably well from the line:

• Lakers: 78%
• Wizards: 75%

The important difference was volume.

The Lakers attempted twice as many free throws as the Wizards. That created a 13-point advantage from the charity stripe.

Austin Reaves was a major contributor, converting 11 of 12 free throws.

When a team combines 56% field-goal shooting with 32 free-throw attempts, it creates a very difficult scoring profile for an opponent to match.

Rebounding Was a Major Lakers Advantage

The Lakers won the overall rebounding battle 48-33.

That is a 15-rebound difference.

Rebounding affects more than the simple box-score total. Strong defensive rebounding can end possessions, while offensive rebounding can create additional scoring opportunities.

Several Lakers players contributed heavily:

• LeBron James: 10 rebounds
• Jarred Vanderbilt: 8 rebounds
• Deandre Ayton: 7 rebounds
• Jaxson Hayes: 7 rebounds
• Rui Hachimura: 6 rebounds

The distribution is important. Los Angeles did not rely on one player to dominate the glass.

Washington’s leading listed rebound contributors included Tre Johnson with six, Anthony Gill with five, and Jamir Watkins with five.

The Lakers’ depth on the boards helped explain how they could control the game even without a major three-point advantage.

Assists and Playmaking

Los Angeles finished with 29 assists compared with 25 for Washington.

The difference was relatively small, but the individual distribution was notable.

LeBron James led the Lakers with 12 assists, while Austin Reaves added nine. Together, they accounted for 21 of the team’s 29 assists.

For Washington, Bub Carrington and Jamir Watkins each recorded five assists, while Sharife Cooper also had five.

This shows two different playmaking structures.

Los Angeles relied heavily on two major creators, James and Reaves, while Washington spread its assists among several players.

The Lakers’ model produced more efficient offense because their passing was combined with a much higher field-goal percentage.

Turnovers and Steals

Washington committed only nine turnovers, which was better than the Lakers’ 15.

The Wizards also recorded 11 steals compared with seven for Los Angeles.

On these specific defensive activity statistics, Washington actually had the advantage.

That makes the final score even more interesting.

The Wizards generated more steals and committed fewer turnovers, but they still lost by 19 points.

The explanation is that turnover control could not overcome the gap in shooting, free throws, rebounding, and blocks.

The Lakers’ nine blocks compared with Washington’s two were another significant defensive difference.

Interior Defense and Rim Protection

The Lakers recorded nine blocks.

Deandre Ayton contributed three, while Jaxson Hayes added two. Washington finished with only two blocks as a team.

This defensive production helped Los Angeles protect the interior and reduce the effectiveness of Washington’s attempts near the basket.

The combination of nine blocks and 48 rebounds created a strong defensive foundation.

It also meant that Washington had difficulty turning its 93 field-goal attempts into a higher scoring total.

What the Box Score Says About Team Strategy

The statistical profile points toward a clear difference in how the teams won possessions.

Washington’s strengths included:

• Lower turnover total
• More steals
• 25 assists
• Strong individual efficiency from Champagnie
• 33 points in the third quarter

Los Angeles’ strengths were broader:

• 56% field-goal shooting
• 48 rebounds
• 29 assists
• 25 free throws made
• Nine blocks
• Multiple double-digit scorers
• Dominant second quarter

This is why the final score was not simply a product of one hot scorer.

The Lakers won several different statistical categories at once.

Key Statistical Takeaways

1. The Second Quarter Changed the Game

The Lakers outscored Washington 40-18 in the second quarter.

That 22-point difference was the single largest swing in the game.

2. Los Angeles Shot Much More Efficiently

The Lakers made 56% of their field goals compared with 44% for Washington.

3. The Lakers Dominated the Glass

Los Angeles grabbed 48 rebounds to Washington’s 33.

4. Free-Throw Volume Favored Los Angeles

The Lakers attempted 32 free throws while Washington attempted 16.

5. Washington Protected the Ball Better

The Wizards committed nine turnovers, six fewer than Los Angeles.

6. Washington’s Three-Point Shooting Was a Problem

The Wizards made only seven of 35 three-point attempts, or 20%.

7. Lakers Depth Was Important

Hayes and Kennard each scored 19 points from the bench, matching Austin Reaves’ 19-point total.

Previous Season Matchup

The March 31 meeting was not the first time these teams met during the season.

The previous matchup took place on January 31, 2026, when the Lakers defeated Washington 142-111.

That result means Los Angeles won both meetings during the season.

The two victories were also substantially different in scoring totals. The January game reached 142 points for Los Angeles, while the March matchup finished at 120.

The repeated success nevertheless establishes the broader season-series result: the Lakers finished 2-0 against the Wizards.

Why the Final Score Can Be Misleading

A box score can make it appear that the Lakers simply outplayed Washington in every category, but that is not completely accurate.

Washington had advantages in several areas.

The Wizards:

• Had fewer turnovers
• Recorded more steals
• Had a competitive 25-assist total
• Scored 33 points in the third quarter

Yet those advantages were overwhelmed by Los Angeles’ efficiency.

This is why washington wizards vs lakers match player stats should be read as a collection of interconnected numbers rather than a list of individual point totals.

A team can win the turnover battle and still lose comfortably if it struggles to convert shots and loses the rebounding battle.

That is exactly what happened here.

Most Important Individual Performances

Several players deserve special attention when ranking the game’s most influential performances.

LeBron James

His 21-point triple-double was the most complete individual statistical performance.

Austin Reaves

His 19 points, nine assists, and 11-of-12 free-throw shooting made him a highly efficient secondary creator.

Jaxson Hayes

His 19 points on 8-of-8 shooting, seven rebounds, and two blocks represented outstanding efficiency.

Luke Kennard

His 19 points on 7-of-10 shooting and 4-of-5 three-point shooting provided elite perimeter efficiency.

Will Riley

His 20 points made him Washington’s leading scorer.

Justin Champagnie

His 18 points on 8-of-12 shooting made him one of Washington’s most efficient offensive players.

Tristan Vukcevic

His four steals and one block gave Washington a notable defensive contribution despite the team’s overall loss.

Understanding the Game Through Advanced Box-Score Thinking

Even without introducing unsupported advanced metrics, several conclusions can be drawn directly from the supplied statistics.

First, Los Angeles converted possessions more efficiently.

Second, the Lakers generated significantly more free-throw attempts.

Third, they controlled the rebound count by 15.

Fourth, their defense produced nine blocks.

Fifth, their scoring was distributed across multiple players.

Washington’s 101 points were not the result of poor effort. The Wizards had several productive individual performances and created defensive events through 11 steals.

The difference was consistency.

Los Angeles maintained a higher level of efficiency across the full game, particularly during the second quarter.

Full Player Production Summary

Los Angeles Lakers

Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists	Other Key Stats
LeBron James	21	10	12	8-16 FG
Rui Hachimura	14	6	0	6-10 FG
Jake LaRavia	4	3	2	2-3 FG
Deandre Ayton	12	7	1	3 BLK, 5-5 FG
Austin Reaves	19	3	9	11-12 FT
Jarred Vanderbilt	4	8	1
Drew Timme	0	1	1
Dalton Knecht	0	0	1
Jaxson Hayes	19	7	0	2 BLK, 8-8 FG
Luke Kennard	19	2	1	4-5 3PT
Kobe Bufkin	2	0	0
Bronny James	6	1	1
Luka Doncic	DNP			Coach’s decision

Washington Wizards

Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists	Other Key Stats
Justin Champagnie	18	4	2	8-12 FG
Tristan Vukcevic	14	3	1	4 STL, 1 BLK
Bub Carrington	5	1	7
Will Riley	20	2	2
Tre Johnson	11	6	2
Anthony Gill	11	5	1
Sharife Cooper	3	2	5
Jamir Watkins	8	5	5	2 STL
Jaden Hardy	11	5	0
Kyshawn George	DNP			Left elbow
Alex Sarr	DNP			Left toe
Bilal Coulibaly	DNP			Right heel

Final Assessment

The March 31, 2026 meeting between Washington and Los Angeles was decided by efficiency rather than simply by scoring volume.

Washington attempted 93 field goals, 14 more than Los Angeles, but the Lakers made 56% of their attempts compared with 44% for the Wizards. Los Angeles also controlled the rebound battle 48-33, made 25 free throws, and recorded nine blocks.

LeBron James produced the game’s most complete individual performance with 21 points, 10 rebounds, and 12 assists. Austin Reaves provided 19 points and nine assists, while Jaxson Hayes and Luke Kennard each added 19 points with exceptional shooting efficiency.

Washington had strong individual contributions from Will Riley, Justin Champagnie, Tristan Vukcevic, Tre Johnson, Anthony Gill, and others. Riley led the Wizards with 20 points, while Champagnie shot 8-of-12 from the field. Vukcevic added four steals and one block.

The biggest lesson from the game is that individual box-score production needs context. Washington won the turnover battle and produced more steals, but Los Angeles was more efficient with its shooting, stronger on the glass, more productive at the free-throw line, and more effective as a rim-protecting team.

The result was a 120-101 Lakers victory and a 2-0 season-series sweep over Washington.